The description is actually wrong. Which you would have noticed had you read the link and not all jumped on the anti-Microsoft bandwagon.
Recipient shall not distribute the Software, in whole or in part, in conjunction with any Publicly Available Software.
Which means that you can't distribute Gpl'ed software with the SDK. It's actually quite a simple indemnity from Microsoft - they don't want to be seen supporting Open Source, but they ARE NOT actively against it.
Again, if you'd actually read the link....
------
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010409
Finally, someone actually gets it.
And the next version...
Windows DOJ
someone@somemachine>su someoneelse
password:
sorry.
Oops, wrong password. Try again.
someone@somemachine>su someoneelse
password:
someoneelse@somemachine>
There, that wasn't too hard.
And the 2.4 kernel series (and the later 2.2s) support USB. CD-writing works too.
bash>wine explorer There, that wasn't so hard, was it?
Which means that you can't distribute Gpl'ed software with the SDK.
It's actually quite a simple indemnity from Microsoft - they don't want to be seen supporting Open Source, but they ARE NOT actively against it.
Again, if you'd actually read the link....
------
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010409