4. Dreamweaver allows preview easily How to preview in two clicks of your mouse whilst handcoding html: Click out of text editor, into an browser with your work open in it, click on reload button.
Bush has protesters all the time, and they aren't arrested. Because it doesn't matter anymore, you're stuck with him until the end of the year, no matter what they say.
The United States Government is, and has been for some time, the largest giver in absolute dollars of any nation in the world. There are tons of references to this online but here is one: http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/USAid.asp#ForeignAidNumbersinChartsandGraphs A loan is not a gift. Official aid is not free, there are strings attached.
No matter how you slice the numbers the United States through it's government and private citizens are the most generous givers That is UTTER bullshit, your own link slices the numbers and in EVERY WAY but one, the US is far, far from first place, never mind your mistaken idea about giving VS loaning.
Arthur C. Clarke in his 1955 novel Earthlight â" firing jets of molten metal using strong electromagnetic fields. New York Sun July 10, 1934
INVENTS PEACE RAY
Tesla Describes His Beam of Destructive Energy
Invention of a "beam of matter moving at high velocity" which would act as a "beam of destructive energy" was announced today by Dr. Nikola Tesla, the inventor, in his annual birthday interview. Dr. Tesla is 78, and for the past several years has made his anniversary the occasion for announcement of scientific discoveries.
The beam, as described by the inventor to rather bewildered reporters, would be projected on land from power houses set 200 miles or so apart and would provide an impenetrable wall for a country in time of war. Anything with which the ray came in contact would be destroyed, the inventor indicated. Planes would fall, armies would be wiped out and even the smallest country might so insure "security. against which nothing could avail.
Dr. Tesla announced that he plans to suggest his method at Geneva as an insurance of peace.
They should be afraid of the genuine article too. Only free software can be audited, modified and trusted.
Which is why intelligence agencies love nationally-owned, proprietary closed-source. They've been doing this for years, now they're worried that what goes around comes around.
I'm sure it will retire to a nice well-paid job in the defense industry. The revolving door of the military industrial congress complex: It is retiring from military service to civilian service.
3 words: Stealth jet limo. The next person to make fun of Scientology gets a surprise visit from Travolta and his payload.
why are they called "stealth fighters"? They're actually a tactical bomber, and so far as I know, they don't have any method of attacking another air craft. I suspect they called it that to make advisories confused about the aircraft's capabilities. You believe they act according to Sun Tzu. I'm a cynic: I firmly believe hot shots want to be fighter pilots, and I know marketing is important to the "defense" industry.
the SR-71 was designed in the 60's, the stealth fighter was designed in the 70's, the F-22 started in the mid 80's, kinda makes you wonder what the hell they're working on now! Probably overbudgeting something confiscated from the Nazis, like the B-2 and the Ho IX.
I really hate idiots who play with laser pointers.
I'm with you. I'm an Aussie and I'm fine with the law. [...] this wasnt even one of the lasers that they're banning. Remind me why you're fine with this law?
When you're dealing with people like that, it's unfortunately necessary to take away people's right to carry lasers that could actually cause eye damage. And come to think of it, pretty much any weapon. The problem is that the chav scum basically have nothing to do other than pick fights with random passers by. They have absolutely no ability to see that in the long run this will land them in prison. If you let them have low power lasers they will dazzle people to try to start some drama. They can harass drivers with lasers. They can harass drivers with rocks. They can harass drivers with sticks. They can harass drivers with dog shit. They can harass drivers with their own feces. They can harass drivers with socks full of coins.
The problem is not the availability of lasers, but the willingness to misuse them.
You can use a knife as a weapon. You can use a wrench as a weapon. You can use a cricket bat as a weapon. You can use a broom handle with nails innit as a weapon. David could use a rock in a sling to kill a giant, you can make a sling out of your clothes.
but there is no legitimate reason to carry one in your pocket. Who makes that call? Who's the authoritarian bureaucrat who gets to decide what is legitimate for me to carry around in my pocket? Who gave them that power, and by what criteria do they evaluate legitimacy?
Thus carrying them without a license should be illegal and people that break the law should be punished. You don't think they should be allowed, and you want people who have them punished, regardless of the use they make of it. You threw in an appeal to the authority of the law in there, but your "thus" was not preceded by actual conclusive logic.
The rationale for that is the otherwise kids will shine them in people's eyes Rational people would conclude that IF the problem is when they are in kid hands, THEN the solution is to ban them from kid hands, not every hand. I'm not a kid, I know not to shine a laser in people's eyes.
It seems like if it can pop balloons, it's not the sort of thing you want drunken kids playing with. Pins Knives Matches Hunting rifles Broken glass Lit cigarettes
Yup, I don't want drunken kids playing with any of those. I don't want to ban sober grown ups from having them, though.
Flamebait? which genius modded that comment to this? The ones that think flamebait means "a comment with bad words in it". There should be a test thread to test a users' moderation abilities before allowing them to wield real points.
If a policeman is asking you questions, the chances are he's investigating either you or someone you know. Consequently, it is never safe to give information to a policeman, unless you know that they aren't trying to get you or anyone you care about. Yeh, right. Two weeks ago, the police came around and asked me whether I had heard any shouting from next door, because a woman had been beaten up. Clearly I should have told them nothing. I didn'tknow it was part of a ruse to get at me. Do you know if you care about the people next door?
And do you know if the law requires you to lend assistance to people in distress? If you heard shouts and did nothing, you might have been criminally negligent in your duty to intervene.
Not really, patents lifespan is some 20 years from being granted, as opposed to copyright which is 70+ after author's death. That is the current state of affairs. The point I'm making is that there is concerted lobbying efforts to extend this time frame. And judging from the copyright trends, to extend it indefinitely.
selling a finished, successfully launched and proven technology paid for by Canadian taxpayers in a finished form that is literally just coming online (and about to pay dividends) makes no sense at all. The pig is fat, now's the time to kill and eat it!
The fear is that if the technology and control of the tech is sold to a U.S. company, the U.S. government will be able to control what the Canadian Government sees - allowing, for instance, U.S. warships to use the Northwest Passage without informing the Government of Canada. Are Canadian ships dependent on GPS yet, or is there still someone who can navigate by natural stars on board?
Slashdot Mirror
It's THAT easy.
Official aid is not free, there are strings attached. No matter how you slice the numbers the United States through it's government and private citizens are the most generous givers That is UTTER bullshit, your own link slices the numbers and in EVERY WAY but one, the US is far, far from first place, never mind your mistaken idea about giving VS loaning.
You are innocent until proven guilty; at least, in theory, in America.
That's pre-911 thinking, citizen.If a US citizen speaks out against the US government today, nothing happens. CHARLESTON, WV - The American Civil Liberties Union today filed a lawsuit against the United States Secret Service and Greg Jenkins, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of White House Advance, on behalf of a West Virginia couple who were arrested at a Fourth of July presidential appearance at the state Capitol because they were wearing t-shirts critical of the president
Are you ignorant or dishonest?
July 10, 1934
INVENTS PEACE RAY
Tesla Describes His Beam of Destructive Energy
Invention of a "beam of matter moving at high velocity" which would act as a "beam of destructive energy" was announced today by Dr. Nikola Tesla, the inventor, in his annual birthday interview. Dr. Tesla is 78, and for the past several years has made his anniversary the occasion for announcement of scientific discoveries.
The beam, as described by the inventor to rather bewildered reporters, would be projected on land from power houses set 200 miles or so apart and would provide an impenetrable wall for a country in time of war. Anything with which the ray came in contact would be destroyed, the inventor indicated. Planes would fall, armies would be wiped out and even the smallest country might so insure "security. against which nothing could avail.
Dr. Tesla announced that he plans to suggest his method at Geneva as an insurance of peace.
They should be afraid of the genuine article too. Only free software can be audited, modified and trusted.
Which is why intelligence agencies love nationally-owned, proprietary closed-source. They've been doing this for years, now they're worried that what goes around comes around.3 words: Stealth jet limo.
The next person to make fun of Scientology gets a surprise visit from Travolta and his payload.
I'm a cynic: I firmly believe hot shots want to be fighter pilots, and I know marketing is important to the "defense" industry.
I'm with you. I'm an Aussie and I'm fine with the law.
[...]
this wasnt even one of the lasers that they're banning. Remind me why you're fine with this law?
They can harass drivers with rocks.
They can harass drivers with sticks.
They can harass drivers with dog shit.
They can harass drivers with their own feces.
They can harass drivers with socks full of coins.
The problem is not the availability of lasers, but the willingness to misuse them.
You can use a knife as a weapon.
You can use a wrench as a weapon.
You can use a cricket bat as a weapon.
You can use a broom handle with nails innit as a weapon.
David could use a rock in a sling to kill a giant, you can make a sling out of your clothes.
Who's the authoritarian bureaucrat who gets to decide what is legitimate for me to carry around in my pocket?
Who gave them that power, and by what criteria do they evaluate legitimacy? Thus carrying them without a license should be illegal and people that break the law should be punished. You don't think they should be allowed, and you want people who have them punished, regardless of the use they make of it.
You threw in an appeal to the authority of the law in there, but your "thus" was not preceded by actual conclusive logic. The rationale for that is the otherwise kids will shine them in people's eyes Rational people would conclude that IF the problem is when they are in kid hands, THEN the solution is to ban them from kid hands, not every hand.
I'm not a kid, I know not to shine a laser in people's eyes.
Knives
Matches
Hunting rifles
Broken glass
Lit cigarettes
Yup, I don't want drunken kids playing with any of those.
I don't want to ban sober grown ups from having them, though.
There should be a test thread to test a users' moderation abilities before allowing them to wield real points.
And do you know if the law requires you to lend assistance to people in distress? If you heard shouts and did nothing, you might have been criminally negligent in your duty to intervene.
Lets not use two words when one is enough.
This way madness lays: From "janitor" to "infrastructure operational and sanitation maintenance technician"... MADNESS!
The point I'm making is that there is concerted lobbying efforts to extend this time frame. And judging from the copyright trends, to extend it indefinitely.