yes, same here, no matter where i go, i see it as well. They advertise it as if it were for security. However, there is always some good lookin' girl on the same add... AND we can all see what the intended use of the camera is...
Hmmm...
I think i'll move to England when I get older. One question though: You guys have a great democracy (not a monarchy) so why the hell do you still have a queen. All the qeen appears to do is look filthy rich, smile and wave in that utterly rediculous hand motion. After all, parliment does everything; correct?
listen guys, OSS is great, I use it for my all of my servers, and my database's... but, ya know what? Guess what is on my desktop?? Thats right, windows, 2000 pro to be exact. Ya know why? Because in general OSS on the desktop, is very badly implemented. Sure, there is KDE and GNOME, but think of what you have to do to maintain a working desktop... Sure, at first getting it up is easy, but maintaing it from the home users point of view- i dont think so. This may sound like a good/bad idea for you guys... but, get a central "company" (no, redhat doesnt cut it) that distributes a single distro of linux, get the KDE and GNOME guys together to create a SINGLE desktop environment, bind it to that version of linux, write *home* apps, that use a STANDARD interface, market it for the home consumer, and sell it for $20 a pop. If you want OSS to replace windows, and have true innovation, then do that.
yes, same here, no matter where i go, i see it as well. They advertise it as if it were for security. However, there is always some good lookin' girl on the same add... AND we can all see what the intended use of the camera is...
Hmmm... I think i'll move to England when I get older. One question though: You guys have a great democracy (not a monarchy) so why the hell do you still have a queen. All the qeen appears to do is look filthy rich, smile and wave in that utterly rediculous hand motion. After all, parliment does everything; correct?
DocWatson... man I love to hear his 'pickin.
truth be told, it was given to me in the wrapper for christmas last year. So yes, it was not payed for by me, but it is not a pirated copy either.
listen guys, OSS is great, I use it for my all of my servers, and my database's... but, ya know what? Guess what is on my desktop?? Thats right, windows, 2000 pro to be exact. Ya know why? Because in general OSS on the desktop, is very badly implemented. Sure, there is KDE and GNOME, but think of what you have to do to maintain a working desktop... Sure, at first getting it up is easy, but maintaing it from the home users point of view- i dont think so. This may sound like a good/bad idea for you guys... but, get a central "company" (no, redhat doesnt cut it) that distributes a single distro of linux, get the KDE and GNOME guys together to create a SINGLE desktop environment, bind it to that version of linux, write *home* apps, that use a STANDARD interface, market it for the home consumer, and sell it for $20 a pop. If you want OSS to replace windows, and have true innovation, then do that.
as long as they are not directly calling the hardware. am I correct?