Yeah, you go ahead and tell yourself you know more than a Ph.D. who studied for decades. Interpret your own test results. LOL. Enjoy the graveyard, you religious science hater.
How do attitudes like yours help to keep people of color out of good jobs? How would you defend your hiring practices against charges of racial discrimination, considering the graduation rates of whites vs. people of color?
This is where social networking comes in handy. I've had candidates track me down on LinkedIn and email their resume that way - I always look at those resumes since I know that it's not someone who's shotgunning his resume across every open job posting they can find regardless of relevancy to his experience.
Ah, so it's cronyism then. Does this method comply with EEOC guidelines? What do you tell the inspectors when they arrive and ask how you respect racial equality in hiring? What's the racial breakdown of linkedin users versus the US population, and how could this be used to prove racism?
Who do you trust? A reporter for the New York Times, or a corporate CEO? This is a no-brainer, people. One has the exposure of lies and the safety of the people in mind. The other has only corporate profits to think of. Which one do you trust?
I never thought I would be sorry to see CmdrTaco go, but these sorts of non-nerds stories are here all the time now. Come ON, the federal budget? Gahhh...
Have a look at the prize winners from the last 20 years. It's like an all-star list of left-wingers dear to the hearts of other left-wingers. Kofi Annan? Jimmy Carter? Al Gore? Yasser fucking Arafat?!?
Then look at the earlier ones. You get these weird ones who just don't belong, like Mother Theresa or Andrei Sakharov.
Funny, the story I got from that was an ordinary American having the nerve to question his betters, and being soundly put back in his place by authority. They went after him, bigtime. All for the crime of daring to ask an inconvenient question. They'll do it to you, too.
The headline is what's known as "an inconvenient truth". If your culture approves of you having a 3 hour workday while getting paid for 7, then you have a 3 hour workday. I love your justification: "they're there for 7 hours, they're just incredibly lazy!" Frankly it would look better for the French if they just went to the 15 hour work week. Your way sounds worse
Eh, you'd be surprised what goes on. I've seen buyers like this before.
Are you sure it's just that you don't want what he said to be true? I have had contact with the French in international business and find their home offices impossible to deal with.
Uh, have we missed the part where their country is flat broke precisely due to these policies?
And where'd the US part come in? We're talking about France. It's not all about you Americans, you know. Shut up about yourselves once in a while, it does the internet good.
Email issued by a university vice-president. Not surprised he doesn't know anything about common email frauds. He probably verbally dictated it to a secretary who took notes in shorthand and later typed it into the computer. The email has no spelling errors, a dead giveaway. What's his email address? I think a prince from Nigeria may have some good news for him soon...
You've got a lot of never calling Standford and MIT professors incompetent. What are your qualifications? If you couldn't qualify for those universities then we have a big clue right there.
What's the word for the intellectual fallacy you're using? I forget the name. We're talking about French workers being lazy and surly, and yet here you are (again) changing the subject to America. America, America, America, the world revolves around you and every conversation MUST immediately change to be about you. Sad, really.
Yeah, one of the driving forces behind leftism right now is "people shouldn't need to work". This is because right now, people who work get the most money, and this is wrong (according to leftists). If we let people enjoy prosperity without working, then, nobody will work. This is a moral hazard. It's like letting banksters get away with fraud, it encourages destructive behavior. I know I wouldn't work if I didn't have to. Why not? Leech off the idiots who are dumb enough to bust their asses all day! I'm gonna sit here and play MOH2. LOL
No, because China only copies others. A slowdown in Western innovation due to patents will not result in relocation. There just won't be much innovation.
Foreign trade is becoming less and less important to China. Besides, Chinese get extremely emotional and do not think rationally when it comes to the topic of America. They become hateful and want to destroy. Sort of like liberals in that sense.
It's not the homeless people peeing everywhere. No, it is the schools. You put your kid in a public school and he will get the shit beaten out of him on a regular basis, be exposed to drugs, gangs, teachers who cheat on behalf of the students on the standardized tests so they won't get fired for being incompetent, children who have been in prison and will be there again, and many other horrors. THAT'S why nobody lives downtown.
That's rather misleading. There was no government policy to create an open internet. It only happened because a bunch of free-thinkers were given the task, and they had to connect a bunch of heterogeneous systems. If it had been a political issue it would have been subject to all the wasteful influences that we know well. It simply flew under the radar until the government discovered it because internet started to be installed on their computers around 1995. Heck, Al Gore tried to claim credit for the whole shebang.
Slashdot Mirror
It's you, isn't it! Do you have a soul patch?
Waitaminute - the US government owns 86% of the land in Nevada, and you find it unbelievable that a survey error happened? WTF
Yeah, you go ahead and tell yourself you know more than a Ph.D. who studied for decades. Interpret your own test results. LOL. Enjoy the graveyard, you religious science hater.
How do attitudes like yours help to keep people of color out of good jobs? How would you defend your hiring practices against charges of racial discrimination, considering the graduation rates of whites vs. people of color?
Ah, so it's cronyism then. Does this method comply with EEOC guidelines? What do you tell the inspectors when they arrive and ask how you respect racial equality in hiring? What's the racial breakdown of linkedin users versus the US population, and how could this be used to prove racism?
Who do you trust? A reporter for the New York Times, or a corporate CEO? This is a no-brainer, people. One has the exposure of lies and the safety of the people in mind. The other has only corporate profits to think of. Which one do you trust?
I never thought I would be sorry to see CmdrTaco go, but these sorts of non-nerds stories are here all the time now. Come ON, the federal budget? Gahhh...
Better stick to using coal, then.
Have a look at the prize winners from the last 20 years. It's like an all-star list of left-wingers dear to the hearts of other left-wingers. Kofi Annan? Jimmy Carter? Al Gore? Yasser fucking Arafat?!?
Then look at the earlier ones. You get these weird ones who just don't belong, like Mother Theresa or Andrei Sakharov.
Funny, the story I got from that was an ordinary American having the nerve to question his betters, and being soundly put back in his place by authority. They went after him, bigtime. All for the crime of daring to ask an inconvenient question. They'll do it to you, too.
The headline is what's known as "an inconvenient truth". If your culture approves of you having a 3 hour workday while getting paid for 7, then you have a 3 hour workday. I love your justification: "they're there for 7 hours, they're just incredibly lazy!" Frankly it would look better for the French if they just went to the 15 hour work week. Your way sounds worse
Are you sure it's just that you don't want what he said to be true? I have had contact with the French in international business and find their home offices impossible to deal with.
And where'd the US part come in? We're talking about France. It's not all about you Americans, you know. Shut up about yourselves once in a while, it does the internet good.
Email issued by a university vice-president. Not surprised he doesn't know anything about common email frauds. He probably verbally dictated it to a secretary who took notes in shorthand and later typed it into the computer. The email has no spelling errors, a dead giveaway. What's his email address? I think a prince from Nigeria may have some good news for him soon...
You've got a lot of never calling Standford and MIT professors incompetent. What are your qualifications? If you couldn't qualify for those universities then we have a big clue right there.
Which has resulted in the screwed-up situation that France is facing today! Yeah, what a great idea, let's copy them!
What's the word for the intellectual fallacy you're using? I forget the name. We're talking about French workers being lazy and surly, and yet here you are (again) changing the subject to America. America, America, America, the world revolves around you and every conversation MUST immediately change to be about you. Sad, really.
Yeah, one of the driving forces behind leftism right now is "people shouldn't need to work". This is because right now, people who work get the most money, and this is wrong (according to leftists). If we let people enjoy prosperity without working, then, nobody will work. This is a moral hazard. It's like letting banksters get away with fraud, it encourages destructive behavior. I know I wouldn't work if I didn't have to. Why not? Leech off the idiots who are dumb enough to bust their asses all day! I'm gonna sit here and play MOH2. LOL
Yeah, the way it's worded pretty much excludes blacks and Latinos from the inner city. Sad that such racism still exists today.
No, because China only copies others. A slowdown in Western innovation due to patents will not result in relocation. There just won't be much innovation.
Foreign trade is becoming less and less important to China. Besides, Chinese get extremely emotional and do not think rationally when it comes to the topic of America. They become hateful and want to destroy. Sort of like liberals in that sense.
It's not the homeless people peeing everywhere. No, it is the schools. You put your kid in a public school and he will get the shit beaten out of him on a regular basis, be exposed to drugs, gangs, teachers who cheat on behalf of the students on the standardized tests so they won't get fired for being incompetent, children who have been in prison and will be there again, and many other horrors. THAT'S why nobody lives downtown.
That's rather misleading. There was no government policy to create an open internet. It only happened because a bunch of free-thinkers were given the task, and they had to connect a bunch of heterogeneous systems. If it had been a political issue it would have been subject to all the wasteful influences that we know well. It simply flew under the radar until the government discovered it because internet started to be installed on their computers around 1995. Heck, Al Gore tried to claim credit for the whole shebang.
Doesn't change the fact that America sucks, is racist, and kills brown people with drones.
Gosh, go figure, freedom is more important than convenience.