Slashdot Mirror
How Sequestration Will Affect Federal Research Agencies
carmendrahl writes "Unless Congress and the White House act before March 1, the automatic across-the-board spending cuts known as the sequester will kick in. And federal agencies are bracing for the fiscal impact. Federal agencies and the White House are releasing details about how these cuts will affect their operations. If the cuts take effect, expect fewer inspections to the food supply, cuts to programs that support cleanups at former nuclear plants, and plenty of researcher layoffs, among other things."
spring time... flu season, isn't it? Comes summer with increased risk of food poisoning?
Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
You know they will somehow extend this hard deadline, just like the last.. three times? I lost count.
Sheer bloody idiots. They couldn't get their act together to get sensible budgets, so now we end up with this. Shame it's not tied into Politicians' pay, but they're probably getting their cuts of the pie from the people who will benefit from all this.
Waiting for an amusing sig.
Whenever a government department is threatened with cuts, they announce that they'll cut front-line staff and not overpaid managers or worthless paper-pushers. That's why government spending expands forever until the economy collapses.
It's worth noting that all this discomfort only results in a drop of $85 billion. In part, that is because mandatory spending, which is something like 60% of the budget, isn't affected.
Still, looking at the list, there's a number of worthy budget cuts, such as the oversized federal law enforcement, small business loans, and various "government service" rent seeking. And one really has a hard time arguing against a 13% cut back in defense spending.
As I see it, the problem with sequestering isn't that it cuts government services, but that by its nature it can't target less effective spending or any mandatory spending at all.
The US has got 425 dollar billionaires, 34% of the world's total.
Relax, America is still number 1 where it counts.
It is a scam.
They make sure the thing people care about get cut first.
The things that really should be cut never get touched.
We all get cowed into giving them more and more money.
See how much of an automatic cut your senators pay gets.
No, wait they still get an automatic raise
Makes me crazy.
So when do they disband the TSA and Fatherland^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Homeland security?
Notice how whenever there is a push to raise taxes, or pass some budget, how the people are always threatened with sacrifices to core services. Airport security, food safety, firefighter equipment, books for school children and so on. Never are absurd government programs in any such danger. They always grab you by the balls and squeeze. Pay up or else.
There are going to be a lot of defense contractors being laid off. Great time for China and other countries to go on a hiring spree! These are the guys insuring America's technological superiority in that segment, and I'm sure a lot of them would jump at an opportunity to continue feeding their families!
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Buy fewer office supplies and move on with your life.
Just a few years ago, the budget was 2/3 of what it is now, so how were food inspections paid for then?
Most people don't realize that this big deficit spending problem started when the $787B "one time stimulus" became part of the baseline budget and was re-spent (and then some) year after year after year on the biggest government expansion ever seen on this Earth. That $787B is STILL being spent over and over again.
Bond Bubble Ben is still printing Bernanke Bucks at a rate of about $1T/year as well, because the FED is the only entity willing to buy new US debt anymore.
When are Americans going to wake up and realize that you can't spend money you don't have on things you neither want nor need and expect to come out ahead at the end of the day?
I guess "as long as I'm getting mine" is the new American Dream.
Here are some gross, as in disgusting, numbers for US Government Spending:
2006: 2655.1B
2007: 2728.7B
2008: 2982.5B
2009: 3517.7B
2010: 3456.2B
2011: 3598.1B
2001: 1862.8B
If you take the 2001 spending figure and adjust it for inflation, it is 2411B, so in 2011 dollars we're spending 1186B more than we were in 2001.
1.2T in government growth, people. That's 49%. And that's just government growth at the federal level. Government is taking fully 50% more money from us (and our kids, and their kids, and probably also their kids after that) than they were 10 years ago.
Sources:
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/HistoricalBudgetData.xls
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt
Only 22 billion in cuts. Even if people get 'furloughed' for while, if they are essential they are still required to come into work (without pay). But don't you worry, because they have always gotten their backpay when the checks start rolling out again.
This is only more of the OH SH!T YOU'RE ALL GOING TO DIE IN A FIRE BECAUSE OF SEQUESTERING bullsh!t rhetoric. It's only 22 billion dollars and that's chump change compared to how much they waste a year.
Stop spending money you don't have, stop printing money, and tighten your belt. Things would improve if President Obama would stop acting like it's his sweet sixteen party and he's got daddy's credit card.
I never thought I would be sorry to see CmdrTaco go, but these sorts of non-nerds stories are here all the time now. Come ON, the federal budget? Gahhh...
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
my only wish is that it happened a decade ago
The things is, as far as I can tell there are no actual cuts in spending. It's simply that they're going to get a 5% increase in spending instead of an 8% increase and they're calling that a 3% cut and claiming the sky will fall. It shouldn't surprise me that we fall for this but it does.
Sounds like plenty of American engineers will be looking for work.
I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
I for one look forward to all the panicky idiots finally seeing how little we need all the worthless crap they waste our money on.
They're full of it, the sky is going to fall, babies will die, heaven won't accept anymore souls, hell is frozen over, etc, etc........ They have a 14 trillion dollar faux budget (since they haven't actually budgeted jack shit in five years now!) and 84 billion is a drop in the bucket of ADDED money since the work on baseline budgeting which works based on projected growth of everything in the government. The federal government is a parasitic tumor on all of our backs that needs to be cut off. /rant
The economic payout of federal research investment averages around 8:1 in terms of job creation, new revenue, trade, etc. Even research that doesn't lead to new therapeutic modalities still puts people to work and can aid in other research endeavors. There are places in the federal budget with poor payout that deserve to be explored for savings, but research is not one.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
They're decreases in how much spending will go -up-.
The automatic sequestration will only remove $44 billion from this year's budget. Bigger cuts will occur in later years. But you should know that the government will still spend more this year than last, despite the sequestration. It's just that the increase won't be as much. The crying of poverty is just political BS.
They aren't really cutting spending. Spending will still increase, just not as much as they wanted. And for that we get to listen to the Ruling Class whine and moan and act all theatrical about what a terrible panic will ensue because they can't overspend as much as they want.
What a load of bullshit.
And what a load of idiots we are when we let them get away with it. Any program manager who cuts anything critical instead of his own paycheck should be fired immediatly without recourse. And any politician who plays the false panic card during the next few months should get a nice present come next primary season - a challenger who won't sit and take all the bullshit that'll get thrown around.
Folks aren't out rioting in the streets over these cuts like they did in Athens, Madrid, London, Paris....
I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
I'm sure the TSA wont be affected -- think of the children!
And, even with sequestration, Washington would still be spending over TWICE as much as they did during the Clinton administration. Sequestration is means "cutting" about 4% from the planned budget. (While still spending more than last year.)
It's widely believed that Clinton-style budgets were good. If you believe that, you should ask for sequestration times fifteen, cutting the projected budget by 60% to get back to Clinton-like spending.
If the elected officials can't do this then they should resign.
Rightfully killing the F35 would fix all the DODs obligations. Raising the retirement age would fix other budget issues.
For those of you who are "awake".
We can't do anything about the economic collapse; we know that will happen no matter what. But we also know the New World Order is attempting to make it happen a little earlier, so they have some control and can maximize their wealth from the people.
Those of us that are awake, have been working hard to prevent a world war, and to prevent a civil war, and at this point, many believe only one of them can be avoided. Either way, if we have had a good push with our efforts, then Congress will push back the sequester several months, and if we have not done a very good job, then it will hit and activate.
If you follow the mainstream media, it would indicate that gun control will not pass because us pro-gun people have "too much power". All indications are it is going to pass. It will be illegal, but it will pass.
The article (and libs in general) like to point out all the scary stuff that will lose funding in the hope that they can scare the public. What they don't tell you is that the liberals in congress have rejected virtually all of the proposals to cut spending from anywhere. Even if we're just talking about limiting the growth of programs - i.e. keep spending at the current level instead of increasing it, they start going batshit crazy.
It's time to face reality - spending more than you bring in isn't sustainable. No matter how you skin that cat, it just isn't going to work. That's why we've got a 16 TRILLION plus dollar deficit.
The liberal's answer to this is to raise taxes on the rich. I don't fall into that category, but I can tell you if I did, I wouldn't be too happy about paying a larger share of taxes on my income to pull the weight of everyone else. There are a great many folks in America that basically pay no federal income tax because they are low income. So what Obama and the liberals in congress are really saying is it's ok not to go to college and get a decent job because they won't tax you if you can't afford to be taxed, or if you have kids even though you can't afford to take care of them. They've basically removed a reason for people to aspire to educate themselves and get a good job, because if you're poor they're not going to tax you, and if you do get a good job, say you start a company and grow it, they've removed the inventive for you to make more money because they're just going to take more money away from you as you bring more money in.
Because war really is part of Obama's baseline. This, in itself, should scare the shit out of you.
Each and everyone of us telling our employees how they are to use our taxes!?
They are responsible to infoprming us taxpayers what they need funding for and we each decide where our taxes are used. This means genuine government transparancy.
This will solve government failure in budgeting and accounting, as the people will be setting the budget and the tax processors can allocate as each of us say, for accounting purposes.
The constraint of where we the people can say to use our taxes is that it must be for the generation of team work benefits we the people can share in, unl;ike the full benefits now claimed by the politicians who think "we the people" is just them.
This also helps deal with lying politicians who say what they will to get our vote but then flip flop while somehow claiming they represent us still.
We the people are the paying boss.
Look up the history of when taxes begain and understand the Declaration of Independence clairity of our rights and duty to put off bad government and replace it with what will do what the founders intended, look after our future security and this means more than warfarem but financial etc...
The eaisest transition to do this is we the people say where our taxes are to be used. There is nothing in law that violates our constitutional rights and duty for use to have the genuine right to do this.
For if you do not siupport this honesty, then you are one to support rigged elections, You either trust the people, or you don't. And if you don't then I suggest the next time you go to the store, just give teh cashier your money and let them decide what you get in return... for is not that the way things are going with your taxes?
per the most recent CBO estimates. The total budget is $4T. Anybody who is crying tears over any part of the federal government losing a whopping 1% of its budget really needs to re-examine where they are coming from. How many individuals and families deal with far larger swings in income on a weekly basis? How many people have had to abruptly make swift changes to their personal outlays because they or another family member has lost a job? Become ill?
Worse still, are these even real cuts? Or are they just slowing the rate of increase in the growth of spending?
Yeah, it's really weird that government has to spend more money in times of high unemployment. Somehow the words "unemployment benefits" come to mind. That's of course one of the reasons why government should rather spend money in ways that put these people back to work (aka stimulus, which republicans hate, or the American Jobs Act, which republicans blocked last year) -- because it would actually save the government money. Now I know, this is slashdot, some of you prefer to live in a world where those unemployed moochers receive no support from the government, but luckily people who share those beliefs are still the minority.
Historically normal levels of tax on both dividends and capital gains will increase revenues enough to help us avoid:
* raising the age to qualify for social security
* slashing medicare
And making the "Double Irish" and "Dutch Sandwich" tax evasion schemes illegal would also be a better alternative than dealing with a manufactured crisis to take away the benefits our parents enjoyed. We want an America that is at least as good as what our parents enjoyed.
Of course, eliminating government waste and cutting spending responsibly is absolutely essential.
And penalties for large banks that commit fraud and money laundering for drug dealers, etc. should at least be MORE than the profits generated by the illegal activities.
If High Frequency Trading isn't going to be made illegal, then at least a small fee on each transaction would help fund FDIC, reduce the deficit, etc.
Surely this is better than screwing us out of timely Social Security benefits we ALREADY EARNED AND PAID INTO!
Greatest generation my ass. They should be called the Most Selfish Generation because they are screwing over future generations for short-term personal gains or out of willful ignorance. What a sham.
Wake up. This so-called crisis isn't real. It is manufactured to make us afraid and extort us into giving up our hard earned benefits.
inflationary spending by numbers is like slashdot following reader response to political stories (like this one) that increase the number of increasingly shrill comments, but lead the direction of the stories away from the science, the insightful analysis of readers in the forefront of technical knowledge, the prime direction of this forum. If you only look at numbers, your posters will increase up to the point where the focus and direction is completely lost.
In NSA America social networks join you!
The vast majority of the federal budget is mandatory, necessary maintenance/upkeep, earned benefits people paid for years of their lives for, or temporary benefits.
The amount of the budget that funds everything else, stuff like NASA, scientific research, etc makes up a relatively tiny slice of the budget.
So yes, 85 billion isn't huge compared to the overall total but when you subtract out Medicare, Social Security, etc it ends up being a bigger chunk than it first appears.
Besides which, to find total government employment you have to include state and local governments. Total government employment has dropped significantly over the past few years. If the government had held steady we'd have 6% unemployment (or lower) right now. If households, the private sector, and government cut at the same time it's called a depression.
Oh and anyone comparing the government to a family budget is a complete and utter moron. Families don't pay bills and receive income in a currency the family prints in their basement; by definition the federal government can coin or print as much money as they want, including without borrowing if it so chooses (the Fed credits the government account with cash ex nilhilio when the US Mint makes coins). Granted, if you do too much of that interest rates will rise... And if the economy were closer to 100% utilization it would distort the market. But we aren't and interest rates are still at historic lows; banks, corporations, and the richest of the rich are hoarding cash in massive amounts.
We should have automatic stabilizers that kick in and out without requiring Congress' approval. In recessions, government spending kicks up to cover the gap. In boom times spending cuts back and the debt is repaid.
Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
All the parties involved play games with the budget with different motives and incentives.
It would be nice if things could be handled in an open way the public could understand (is that possible anymore, most Americans can't do math?) But the reality is that the politicians benefit from the complexity involved and the confusion they create - if the public finally did their job, then the politicians would step up the complexity (unless voted out of office...)
I'm not worried about a national debt at WW2 levels I'm worried that we didn't have anything near WW2 to justify running it up. It signifies the dysfunctional electorate and is merely a symptom of the classic despotic disease - the one which always ends fatally.
I'm glad the cuts are coming because the important things will be forced and hopefully they won't get as many compromise pork as if they prevented it from happening in 1 mega bill. Even though it may only be for a short period, this may be the biggest military pork CUT we will see until the collapse of the republic.
Politicians in modern times; having such a dysfunctional system, must force impossible situations in order to make the necessary deals happen. Reasoned timely debate is no longer possible; lobbyists have less influence during such deadline crises (unless they helped create them and prepared.) No matter what, there are always bad parts put in with the good parts so thinking a mock crisis changes that is foolish. What it does seem to do is force problems into big massive compromises where maybe there are more bad deals. I would think this is the case since they love to push things back into shared deadlines and combine issues into big bills; however, it could simply be they need to raise the stakes high enough to force it to get done when enough politicians suffer.
Democracy Now! - uncensored, anti-establishment news
Seriously? With record meat and veggie recalls the past ten years the only things being inspected are porn sites by employees. Waste of tax payer money. Accountability and open records will be the fastest way to ensure quality service at a lower cost to tax payer.
the automatic across-the-board strike spending cuts /strike
the automatic across-the-board decreases in the amount of increased spending
FIFY - welcome to baseline budgeting
The Federal funds rates (which has knock-on effects on various lending and account interest rates) is low for that reason.
The low effective interest rate on US treasury securities (which includes the discount rate on T-bills, which technically aren't interest but amount to the same thing), which is what is relevant to the US governments ability to raise money, is because US treasury securities are widely seen as a very secure investment, and investors demand a low risk premium.
Are households sovereigns whose income is set largely by the family's choice of how much to tax?
If not, does it make sense to pretend that the budget of the government of a soverign nation-state differs only in scale from that of a household?
The "sequestration" cuts are $85B out of $3.6T, or ~2.4 %. This has motivated politicians from both parties, and loud-mouthed political actors of all stripes, to make wild claims about terrible consequences if the cuts were to be made. The implicit claim is that cutting 2.4% across the board would result in an "unready, hollow force", 9% unemployment, and all sorts of other horrific things (which I'm sure you've heard of by now).
Is it even true? From cutting a measly 2.4% of future spending? Or is it yet another shock doctrine exercise to distract us from other things we should be paying attention to instead? There's a book, BTW.
etc.
The only way this can not be completely self-contradictory is if you assume that tax rates have no effect whatsoever on revenue. This is, to say the least, and extraordinary claim for which some evidence should be provided, and...
I agree completely. We should return to the historically normal levels of tax on both dividends and capital gains in effect for hundreds of years before 1900.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
i actually think the sequester is good for government and good for people. after reading nicholas taleb's book "anti-fragility" i think a dose of pain inflicted on these agencies is beneficial. its going to force crisper decision making, better prioritizaton and albeit painful i am convinced it is healthy pain. think of this as a bit of toning of the federal body. it will give some muscle ache but in the end it will stenghten it.
i think the managers and agency directors will make really smart decisions unless they somehow convince themselves that this is temporary. make it permanent and move on so we can see how smart the leaders of each agency is, and then afterwards put back in some budget based on where over achievments are possible from held back funds. but friggin A learn to balance spendinging vs. available sources of income.
Coming soon to the corners of the Internet occupied by Americans, a whole wave of recycled horse-burger jokes fresh from their successful appearances in the European corners of the Internet.
In the words of Phineas Freekowtski, "Hubba bubba!"
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"