Thing is, even if you use that truck bed once a month, it's still vital. It's the sort of thing that gets trumpeted from the rafters: "TRUCK DRIVERS DON'T USE THEM AS TRUCKS EVERY DAY!" and fulfills several gratifying stereotypes about deplorable Americans. But the truth is, when you drive a truck, if you need that bed twice a year, it was worth getting a truck.
It is the burden of proof on the journalist to provide sources, and I am baffled you aren't aware of this. They can't just make up news that makes them feel good or that fills their emotional and political needs - but that is exactly what they are doing, sadly.
Anybody - ANYBODY - who still thinks after all this that they can rely on mainstream media like ABC for useful information on the news of the day - presented fairly, offering coverage of all viewpoints, untainted by a concealed agenda - is nothing but a damned fool. Period fucking dot.
So, you utterly and completely fail to refute any arguments I made. "B-B-But Fox News!" does not excuse the New York Times and all of the other highly credible mainstream media outlets from publishing fake news.
CNN is further to the left than Fox is to the right, and it's less accurate, and the reason for that is pretty simple. Media liberals needn't interact with conservatives or take any notice of what they say. They literally cannot even tell you the other side's argument. That's not true of conservatives.
Also, if you get things wrong at Fox, you get called on it by dozens and dozens of liberal journalists. That's not true of anything but the most egregious errors of the NYT or CNN. The 5 percent of the media that leans conservative simply doesn't have the time to fact check the other 95 percent in the way that the other 95 percent checks it. It is, as a result, less accurate (except when checked by fellow left-leaning "fact checkers").
Diversity is strength. Wildly different people all together are the best. When everyone speaks the same language and is on the same page, that is a terrible loss of culture. It is incumbent upon us all to keep these languages alive and breathing, and keep these cultures from being annihilated by the Western behemoth.
Why is it your only counter argument is to bring up two news sources that are not at all relevant and unmentioned? You're not disproving the point, which is that our credible, mainstream media staffed by highly educated, erudite journalists, regularly produces fake news. It's a simple matter of psychology: post misleading news, wait for people to react, it's something known as "impression formation". Once an impression has been formed, it sticks. This is how they psyop the masses. This is how they persuade people. A lot of these people will never check the news, they'll never check the sources, they'll never look for the original video, and they'll never see the truth.
New York Times prejudiced against India. ""Of all places" is a very patronising way to describe India, which is one of the leading manufacturers in automobile industry with various auto giants having its manufacturing facilities in India. This is not the first time NYTimes has shown its prejudice against India. Earlier, they had published an op-ed about India that was centered around the CBI raids at the residences of Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, the founder promoters of NDTV. The editorial was titled 'India's Battered Free Press' which read like a textbook case of how it has been distorting the truth. NYTimes' former Delhi bureau chief Ellen Barry had also indulged in white-washing the 2002 Godhra carnage where as many as 59 people were burnt alive in a train. She had also spread lies to insult the victims of Godhra carnage in her report on Gulbarg Society verdict. NYTimes also encourages troll-like behaviour while reporting on democratically elected public representatives where being 'liberal' is associated with smoking, drinking and Hindu woman having Muslim friends and boyfriend."
The greatest danger to our nation comes from a free press that chooses sides in the political process. And that has openly and unapologetically taken place.
Fake news is a huge problem, I agree. A year later and it still shows no signs of getting any better. Recently, four big scoops were run by major news organizations â" written by top reporters and presumably churned through layers of scrupulous editing â" that turned out to be completely wrong: Reuters, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, and others reported that the special counsel's office had subpoenaed Donald Trump's records from Deutsche Bank. They weren't. ABC reported that Trump had directed Michael Flynn to make contact with Russian officials before the election. He didn't. The New York Times ran a story that showed K.T. McFarland had acknowledged collusion. She didn't. Then CNN topped off the week by falsely reporting that the Trump campaign had been offered access to hacked Democratic National Committee emails before they were published.
Forget your routine bias, these were four bombshells disseminated to millions of Americans by breathless anchors, pundits, and analysts, all of them feeding frenzied expectations about collusion that have now been internalized as indisputable truths by many. All four pieces, incidentally, are useless without their central faulty claims. Yet there they sit. And these are only four of dozens of other stories that have fizzled over the year.
If we are to accept the special pleadings of journalists we have to believe these were all honest mistakes. They may be. But a person might then ask, why is it that every one of the dozens of honest mistakes are prejudiced in the very same way? Why hasn't there been a single major honest mistake that diminishes the Trump-Russia collusion story? Why is there never an honest mistake that indicts Democrats?
When all the errors are in the bank's favor, you can be forgiven for thinking there's more at work than sloppy arithmetic.
Lack of testosterone doesn't make men gay, it makes them weak and effeminate. Eating soy does in fact introduce estrogen-like chemicals and does in fact feminize men. Science, bitches.
If these men are prone to fits of uncontrollable rage when confronted with scientific facts, it is likely they are abusing testosterone or anabolic steroids. Both of which have proven, highly negative effects on the male body but which do pump up the muscles.
Uh, no, I didn't link to the WSJ? Please, have a look at the left-wing alternative media. I guarantee you'll like it. You'll get some diverse viewpoints and stop having to attack people's sources instead of dismantle their statements. Diversity makes you strong, only seeing one side of the argument makes you weak. This is why you keep losing arguments.
"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat."
-- Hillary Clinton
"Civilians, particularly women and children, account for the vast majority of those adversely affected by armed conflict."
-- United Nations
Let's have a moment of silence for the biggest victims of war - the women. The men who actually serve in the military? Seems they are the primary perpetrators according to this pervasive worldview.
Whaaa? The unmarried women are unmarried because they don't want anything to do with these lesser men. They would rather go childless and single than accept a man whose life will be that of a shopkeeper, or a factory worker. It's not the men who are causing the problem, it's the women's high standards for a mate.
The mainstream media, which you could argue is adversarial, but what we have is not adversarial. We have a partisan opposition press which works hand in glove with the Democrats. This totally threatens the First Amendment, because when people figure out, which they have, that they can not only tell you who you must vote for, but they can tell you what truth you're allowed to know or not to know, this is hugely damaging to our Republic. As we have seen in all of this other stuff with Russia, all of the stuff with the Clinton Foundation, all these things. The real question becomes why do we need a First Amendment if they're not going to do their job, which is to be the tribune of the people and instead become the partisans of a political movement.
It's not that eating soybeans makes you gay, you are fake news. However, soybeans contain active compounds called isoflavones- these are plant derived phytoestrogens, many of which mimic female hormones such as estrogen and estradiol. There are a number of studies that suggest that soy does indeed have an estrogenic effect on the body, which in turn decreases testosterone levels. Eat too much soy and it makes you less of a man.
Donna Brazile said after Seth Rich was killed, she kept the blinds down to protect from snipers, possibly Russian. OK. The Russians are going to start a possible WWIII with America to kill a man who...according to the DNC, didn't leak any emails.
In 2016 senior leadership within the Obama FBI and Department of Justice, with direct and provable ties straight to the White House, planned and conducted a targeted political operation against a presidential candidate by weaponizing the intelligence community against Donald Trump.
Using sketchy, intentionally misleading and false information provided to a U.S. District Court Judge, the Obama FBI and DOJ colluded to present an application for wiretaps and surveillance authority to the FISA court; subsequently, they used a FISA warrant as part of an exhaustive counterintelligence operation against their political opposition.
A bluff? That's what we're calling lies these days? You do realize that Russia regarded Obama's "red line" in Syria as America's Suez Moment? The moment when the great power reveals itself as weak and cowardly. Russia would have NEVER tried to pull the shit that they pulled, invading Crimea and such, without being absolutely certain that Obama would do nothing. Thanks, Obama.
Yeah, I know. Night and day. Trump hasn't used the IRS or the FBI to attack his political enemies like Obama did. Don't be fooled by loquaciousness and perspicacity, you're smarter than that.
It was Obama who pushed the Russians and Chinese together, not Trump, after his sanctions against Russia in response to the Ukrainian fiasco. It was Obama who fomented a civil war from a domestic situation in a thoroughly corrupt country, Ukraine, when he sent the CIA director to advise the coup government in Kiev the day before they declared war on their own citizens in the east of the country.
It was Obama who degraded the dignity and respect of America's foreign services when he declared that Raymond Davis, CIA, Blackwater contractor James Bond wannabe, a diplomat entitled to the highest level of diplomatic immunity after he killed two Pakistani citizens with an illegal gun, thus severely damaging diplomatic relations with that country.
It was Obama who exacerbated an already unstable situation in Syria when he armed the so-called resistance fighters, thus making sure the country blew up into a full fledged civil war. The war in Syria never was one for diplomatic reforms. It is just a battle among factions, many who are not inclined to respect American values.
The Mid-East is littered with graves of innocent men, women and children blown up by bombs from 30,000 feet. Dropped from American planes, on Obama's orders.
Slashdot Mirror
Wow, I had no idea bodybuilding magazines were respected peer-reviewed publications with double blind trials. I'll inform the academy immediately.
The Second World ceased to exist in 1991. You might want to update your vocabulary.
Why is it that Leftists are always front and center, making excuses for Islam again and again?
Thing is, even if you use that truck bed once a month, it's still vital. It's the sort of thing that gets trumpeted from the rafters: "TRUCK DRIVERS DON'T USE THEM AS TRUCKS EVERY DAY!" and fulfills several gratifying stereotypes about deplorable Americans. But the truth is, when you drive a truck, if you need that bed twice a year, it was worth getting a truck.
It is the burden of proof on the journalist to provide sources, and I am baffled you aren't aware of this. They can't just make up news that makes them feel good or that fills their emotional and political needs - but that is exactly what they are doing, sadly.
ABC News increases orange saturation when filming Trump. Despite two hours of available air time, ABC's Good Morning America on Wednesday skipped a damning New York Times story with a bombshell claim: Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 presidential campaign, was told that Harvey Weinstein was a rapist, but still took his donations and raised money off him.
Anybody - ANYBODY - who still thinks after all this that they can rely on mainstream media like ABC for useful information on the news of the day - presented fairly, offering coverage of all viewpoints, untainted by a concealed agenda - is nothing but a damned fool. Period fucking dot.
So, you utterly and completely fail to refute any arguments I made. "B-B-But Fox News!" does not excuse the New York Times and all of the other highly credible mainstream media outlets from publishing fake news.
CNN is further to the left than Fox is to the right, and it's less accurate, and the reason for that is pretty simple. Media liberals needn't interact with conservatives or take any notice of what they say. They literally cannot even tell you the other side's argument. That's not true of conservatives.
Also, if you get things wrong at Fox, you get called on it by dozens and dozens of liberal journalists. That's not true of anything but the most egregious errors of the NYT or CNN. The 5 percent of the media that leans conservative simply doesn't have the time to fact check the other 95 percent in the way that the other 95 percent checks it. It is, as a result, less accurate (except when checked by fellow left-leaning "fact checkers").
The national media really does work in a bubble, something that wasn't true as recently as 2008. And the bubble is growing more extreme. Concentrated heavily along the coasts, the bubble is both geographic and political. If you're a working journalist, odds aren't just that you work in a pro-Clinton county-odds are that you reside in one of the nation's most pro-Clinton counties.
Diversity is strength. Wildly different people all together are the best. When everyone speaks the same language and is on the same page, that is a terrible loss of culture. It is incumbent upon us all to keep these languages alive and breathing, and keep these cultures from being annihilated by the Western behemoth.
Now you are just outright homophobic. Fuck off, homophobe. Back to your hole, vile troll.
Why is it your only counter argument is to bring up two news sources that are not at all relevant and unmentioned? You're not disproving the point, which is that our credible, mainstream media staffed by highly educated, erudite journalists, regularly produces fake news. It's a simple matter of psychology: post misleading news, wait for people to react, it's something known as "impression formation". Once an impression has been formed, it sticks. This is how they psyop the masses. This is how they persuade people. A lot of these people will never check the news, they'll never check the sources, they'll never look for the original video, and they'll never see the truth.
Despite two hours of available air time, ABC's Good Morning America skipped a damning New York Times story with a bombshell claim: Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 presidential campaign, was told that Harvey Weinstein was a rapist, but still took his donations and raised money off him.
Four viral claims spread by journalists last month that are false.
New York Times prejudiced against India. ""Of all places" is a very patronising way to describe India, which is one of the leading manufacturers in automobile industry with various auto giants having its manufacturing facilities in India. This is not the first time NYTimes has shown its prejudice against India. Earlier, they had published an op-ed about India that was centered around the CBI raids at the residences of Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, the founder promoters of NDTV. The editorial was titled 'India's Battered Free Press' which read like a textbook case of how it has been distorting the truth. NYTimes' former Delhi bureau chief Ellen Barry had also indulged in white-washing the 2002 Godhra carnage where as many as 59 people were burnt alive in a train. She had also spread lies to insult the victims of Godhra carnage in her report on Gulbarg Society verdict. NYTimes also encourages troll-like behaviour while reporting on democratically elected public representatives where being 'liberal' is associated with smoking, drinking and Hindu woman having Muslim friends and boyfriend."
Media shows why it's so mistrusted after falsified Trump fish-feeding 'story'
The greatest danger to our nation comes from a free press that chooses sides in the political process. And that has openly and unapologetically taken place.
Projecting your own local biases onto an alien culture is the sure sign of a parochial mind.
Fake news is a huge problem, I agree. A year later and it still shows no signs of getting any better. Recently, four big scoops were run by major news organizations â" written by top reporters and presumably churned through layers of scrupulous editing â" that turned out to be completely wrong: Reuters, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, and others reported that the special counsel's office had subpoenaed Donald Trump's records from Deutsche Bank. They weren't. ABC reported that Trump had directed Michael Flynn to make contact with Russian officials before the election. He didn't. The New York Times ran a story that showed K.T. McFarland had acknowledged collusion. She didn't. Then CNN topped off the week by falsely reporting that the Trump campaign had been offered access to hacked Democratic National Committee emails before they were published.
Forget your routine bias, these were four bombshells disseminated to millions of Americans by breathless anchors, pundits, and analysts, all of them feeding frenzied expectations about collusion that have now been internalized as indisputable truths by many. All four pieces, incidentally, are useless without their central faulty claims. Yet there they sit. And these are only four of dozens of other stories that have fizzled over the year.
If we are to accept the special pleadings of journalists we have to believe these were all honest mistakes. They may be. But a person might then ask, why is it that every one of the dozens of honest mistakes are prejudiced in the very same way? Why hasn't there been a single major honest mistake that diminishes the Trump-Russia collusion story? Why is there never an honest mistake that indicts Democrats?
When all the errors are in the bank's favor, you can be forgiven for thinking there's more at work than sloppy arithmetic.
Lack of testosterone doesn't make men gay, it makes them weak and effeminate. Eating soy does in fact introduce estrogen-like chemicals and does in fact feminize men. Science, bitches.
If these men are prone to fits of uncontrollable rage when confronted with scientific facts, it is likely they are abusing testosterone or anabolic steroids. Both of which have proven, highly negative effects on the male body but which do pump up the muscles.
Uh, no, I didn't link to the WSJ? Please, have a look at the left-wing alternative media. I guarantee you'll like it. You'll get some diverse viewpoints and stop having to attack people's sources instead of dismantle their statements. Diversity makes you strong, only seeing one side of the argument makes you weak. This is why you keep losing arguments.
"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat."
-- Hillary Clinton
"Civilians, particularly women and children, account for the vast majority of those adversely affected by armed conflict."
-- United Nations
Let's have a moment of silence for the biggest victims of war - the women. The men who actually serve in the military? Seems they are the primary perpetrators according to this pervasive worldview.
Whaaa? The unmarried women are unmarried because they don't want anything to do with these lesser men. They would rather go childless and single than accept a man whose life will be that of a shopkeeper, or a factory worker. It's not the men who are causing the problem, it's the women's high standards for a mate.
Trump recognizes Jerusalem as capital of Israel: WORST. HITLER. EVER!
The mainstream media, which you could argue is adversarial, but what we have is not adversarial. We have a partisan opposition press which works hand in glove with the Democrats. This totally threatens the First Amendment, because when people figure out, which they have, that they can not only tell you who you must vote for, but they can tell you what truth you're allowed to know or not to know, this is hugely damaging to our Republic. As we have seen in all of this other stuff with Russia, all of the stuff with the Clinton Foundation, all these things. The real question becomes why do we need a First Amendment if they're not going to do their job, which is to be the tribune of the people and instead become the partisans of a political movement.
So, you didn't actually investigate the mountain of evidence, you merely attempted to discredit the alternative media outlet that's shouting the truth. Jeez, do you work for the mainstream media or something? An extensive timeline of the corruption in the FBI, and how it affected the election.
Just a few days ago, FBI's top General Counsel James A. Baker, the man who leaked the "Piss Dossier" to Mother Jones (a far left magazine), is reassigned by FBI Director Wray. This is huge, huge. Is your news not reporting this? Maybe you're listening to fake news. Get out and listen to the alternative media. Here's a good starting point for you, he's a leftist just like you, you'll agree with a lot of what he says. Start clicking on the related videos it'll start showing you and follow where they lead. Good luck! I envy the intellectual journey of enlightenment you're about to embark on.
It's not that eating soybeans makes you gay, you are fake news. However, soybeans contain active compounds called isoflavones- these are plant derived phytoestrogens, many of which mimic female hormones such as estrogen and estradiol. There are a number of studies that suggest that soy does indeed have an estrogenic effect on the body, which in turn decreases testosterone levels. Eat too much soy and it makes you less of a man.
You can always tell people who get their information from the mainstream media because they are totally out of the loop about what's really happening. Try this from the alternative media: A Timeline of Treason: How the DNC and FBI Leadership Tried to Fix a Presidential Election. Extensively documented and footnoted.
Donna Brazile said after Seth Rich was killed, she kept the blinds down to protect from snipers, possibly Russian. OK. The Russians are going to start a possible WWIII with America to kill a man who...according to the DNC, didn't leak any emails.
In 2016 senior leadership within the Obama FBI and Department of Justice, with direct and provable ties straight to the White House, planned and conducted a targeted political operation against a presidential candidate by weaponizing the intelligence community against Donald Trump.
Using sketchy, intentionally misleading and false information provided to a U.S. District Court Judge, the Obama FBI and DOJ colluded to present an application for wiretaps and surveillance authority to the FISA court; subsequently, they used a FISA warrant as part of an exhaustive counterintelligence operation against their political opposition.
This is no longer some pie-in-the-sky conspiracy. There is massive evidence, including statements from the co-conspirators, that highlights this exact operation in detail. Thank God for our alternative media which is shining the blinding light of the sun on this blight on our Republic. If things were like Obama wanted in TFA, we would not have alternative media to report these inconvenient truths. Distorting people's understanding of complex issues my ass. Misinformation my ass.
A bluff? That's what we're calling lies these days? You do realize that Russia regarded Obama's "red line" in Syria as America's Suez Moment? The moment when the great power reveals itself as weak and cowardly. Russia would have NEVER tried to pull the shit that they pulled, invading Crimea and such, without being absolutely certain that Obama would do nothing. Thanks, Obama.
Yeah, I know. Night and day. Trump hasn't used the IRS or the FBI to attack his political enemies like Obama did. Don't be fooled by loquaciousness and perspicacity, you're smarter than that.
It was Obama who pushed the Russians and Chinese together, not Trump, after his sanctions against Russia in response to the Ukrainian fiasco. It was Obama who fomented a civil war from a domestic situation in a thoroughly corrupt country, Ukraine, when he sent the CIA director to advise the coup government in Kiev the day before they declared war on their own citizens in the east of the country.
It was Obama who degraded the dignity and respect of America's foreign services when he declared that Raymond Davis, CIA, Blackwater contractor James Bond wannabe, a diplomat entitled to the highest level of diplomatic immunity after he killed two Pakistani citizens with an illegal gun, thus severely damaging diplomatic relations with that country.
It was Obama who exacerbated an already unstable situation in Syria when he armed the so-called resistance fighters, thus making sure the country blew up into a full fledged civil war. The war in Syria never was one for diplomatic reforms. It is just a battle among factions, many who are not inclined to respect American values.
The Mid-East is littered with graves of innocent men, women and children blown up by bombs from 30,000 feet. Dropped from American planes, on Obama's orders.
Obama appointed Pai. Deal with that painful fact.