We modern, civilized people in the 21st century want safety and control.
Speak for yourself. Ultimately we end up locking everyone in cages under 24/7 surveillance and then you have 100% "safety" and control. What you safety nuts fail to understand is that the criminal will always, ALWAYS have the initiative. All these attempts at enforcing pre-crime and thought crime merely result in abuse by authorities but not actual "safety".
So how do you like your slippery slope? We never did bother defining what a "terrorist" actually is. Pretty soon it will include anyone who disagrees with official government policy.
Drug sniffing dogs are no more addicted to drugs than bomb sniffing dogs are addicted to explosives, cash sniffing dogs addicted to cash or cadaver sniffing dogs addicted to dead people. Seriously, dogs have keen noses and will find whatever they are trained to find. The rumor that dogs are turned into drug addicts in order to find drugs is pure unadulterated bullshit.
Honestly I think the kind of person who is likely to go off on such a petty rant isn't going to give a damn if there's a camera there or not. Their sense of superiority and ego is such that they don't actually think at any moment that they are wrong, so what difference would a camera make? It's like saying that the guy with anger issues will not have a road rage episode because of a camera. He's not thinking about the camera - he's off in his own little rage world temporarily but completely disconnected from reality.
Consider it deducted from the amount of payload/second stage you can carry. But if your first stage is engineered to be more than enough for what you need as payload anyway (ie it's already cost effective) you might as well try to recover the cost of it with a soft powered landing and make MORE profit.
I think that soon every note I come across will be exposed to a generous amount of static electricity from my taser before I use it or take it anywhere...
The DHS, which has never caught a "terrorist" ever. At least before the fact. When passengers caught one after the fact (the "underwear bomber") and handed him over to the DHS, they claimed that "the system worked". It used to be that apologists could claim that there had been no terrorist attacks on the US since 9-11 and use that to support an argument that the DHS was a good thing. Well it's 2015, and there have been a few successful attacks now...
WhatsApp just rolled out end to end encryption for their service as well
Right. And exactly how is WhatsApp supposed to monetize you and data-mine you if your messages are encrypted? I'm of the opinion that this is a marketing gimmick with Whatsapp sitting as the man in the middle.
Slashdot Mirror
What war? The United States has declared war? Against which country?
We modern, civilized people in the 21st century want safety and control.
Speak for yourself. Ultimately we end up locking everyone in cages under 24/7 surveillance and then you have 100% "safety" and control. What you safety nuts fail to understand is that the criminal will always, ALWAYS have the initiative. All these attempts at enforcing pre-crime and thought crime merely result in abuse by authorities but not actual "safety".
So how do you like your slippery slope? We never did bother defining what a "terrorist" actually is. Pretty soon it will include anyone who disagrees with official government policy.
Drug sniffing dogs are no more addicted to drugs than bomb sniffing dogs are addicted to explosives, cash sniffing dogs addicted to cash or cadaver sniffing dogs addicted to dead people. Seriously, dogs have keen noses and will find whatever they are trained to find. The rumor that dogs are turned into drug addicts in order to find drugs is pure unadulterated bullshit.
Honestly I think the kind of person who is likely to go off on such a petty rant isn't going to give a damn if there's a camera there or not. Their sense of superiority and ego is such that they don't actually think at any moment that they are wrong, so what difference would a camera make? It's like saying that the guy with anger issues will not have a road rage episode because of a camera. He's not thinking about the camera - he's off in his own little rage world temporarily but completely disconnected from reality.
The ease of being swayed has nothing to do with knowing what is true and what is not.
It's not so much that others are idiots, it's that they actively resist any attempt at being enlightened. They rejoice in their stupidity.
In the meantime another CEO is paying himself a record salary for cutting his stock's value in half...
You're adding more mass, which requires even more fuel.
Consider it deducted from the amount of payload/second stage you can carry. But if your first stage is engineered to be more than enough for what you need as payload anyway (ie it's already cost effective) you might as well try to recover the cost of it with a soft powered landing and make MORE profit.
You are assuming unlimited fuel...
There's no clash. The law is perfectly clear on that subject. Only the government is choosing to ignore it.
Good thing federal law is not enforceable in places like say, Panama. Unless the US wants to invade again...
I hear "Hello World!" works quite well, in the language of your choice since you're going to have to explain it to him.
Everyone knows that real pros use the _strrev function...
That's the day I predict that a lot of things are going to start being sold in oranges, tomatoes and chickens.
I think that soon every note I come across will be exposed to a generous amount of static electricity from my taser before I use it or take it anywhere...
You're missing the point. The apple watch has to be recharged every few days. A normal quartz watch can go 5 years or more on a battery.
And when the battery runs out?
artificial lake
As in, this is exactly what the lake exists for. A reservoir of sorts for slurry and other runoff from industrial processes is common the WORLD OVER.
The DHS, which has never caught a "terrorist" ever. At least before the fact. When passengers caught one after the fact (the "underwear bomber") and handed him over to the DHS, they claimed that "the system worked". It used to be that apologists could claim that there had been no terrorist attacks on the US since 9-11 and use that to support an argument that the DHS was a good thing. Well it's 2015, and there have been a few successful attacks now...
They do it because they can. It's as simple as that.
You're not even trying.
Called Project Spartan because it comes with 300 security holes built in?
WhatsApp just rolled out end to end encryption for their service as well
Right. And exactly how is WhatsApp supposed to monetize you and data-mine you if your messages are encrypted? I'm of the opinion that this is a marketing gimmick with Whatsapp sitting as the man in the middle.