I'd be VER interested to see comparison numbers between the two machines.... Which one actually delivers more bang for the buck? because, I think, that efficient would imply getting more power out of less resources, right???
On a work per dollar bassis, which one actually delivers more??
(screw the NY times, I'll glean the data from re-posts) (and screw all of you first-post weenies.... nothing but garbage 'tween your ears)
Slashdot Mirror
A few interesting questions have just ocured to Me....
How do these megawatt sucking super-machines compare to distributed computing??
Compare, say, the folding@home project, and deep blue... Which has done / does more work/calculations per hour?
How long would it take deep blue to take the #1 spot on the folding@home rankings??
and how great would the potential benefits be, to the human race as a whole, if these monster computers did some folding in their idle time???
I'd be VER interested to see comparison numbers between the two machines.... Which one actually delivers more bang for the buck? because, I think, that efficient would imply getting more power out of less resources, right???
On a work per dollar bassis, which one actually delivers more??
(screw the NY times, I'll glean the data from re-posts) (and screw all of you first-post weenies.... nothing but garbage 'tween your ears)
Too many patents, and nobody will want to do anything....
vc's get ahold of a company, and everything goes to hell.... they hada good buisiness model, once...
All hail the ACS!!!!!
To get some real info on computer forensics, one ought to talk to the experts, the HTCIA members around the world.
they're holding a conference in september, in long beach, non member reg fee's are only $475 US, and I'l garuntee you'll learn something usefull.
for info on the conference, check out http://www.socalhtcia.net