This case may be many things, but it is not a tort case. Rest assured that the ability of corporations to sue to protect what they claim is their property will never be limited.
See the definition of stalking:
1. To pursue by tracking stealthily.
2. To follow or observe (a person) persistently, especially out of obsession or derangement.
3. To go through (an area) in pursuit of prey or quarry.
Luskin spends a lot of time writing about Krugman. I think Krugman (and Atrios) were using the term as in number 2 above.
What you want is slow glass . You leave it in a nice spot, and ten years later you put it in your window frame. The light takes ten years to pass through the glass, and you have ten years of views.
You are both wrong. The full 10-Q does discuss the German case. See below. A registrant must discuss all material litigation. It does not matter whether the litigation involves a subsidiary or the parent, so long as it is material to the entire enterprise.
From the 10Q: "Several entities in Germany have obtained temporary restraining orders in Germany precluding SCO GmbH, the Company's German subsidiary, in substance, from making statements in Germany that disparage Linux, or entities involved in the Linux business, or implicate Linux as infringing the Company's intellectual property rights. SCO GmbH has received an administrative fine of 10,000 Euro for a technical violation of one of the temporary restraining orders. The Company is currently negotiating with the various claimants in Germany over the temporary restraining orders and is evaluating whether it will appeal the administrative fine."
In fact, the thrust of the articles is that Powers was too sympathetic to Heisenberg, and that in fact he would have developed the Bomb had he been able.
See the new Dockers "mobile pant". According to the company, "The Mobile Pant is keeping in step with the needs of men and their high-tech, mobile lifestyle by providing them with a stylish way of carrying the tools of their trade." I'm not sure you can fit a textbook in them though. And apparently they are only for men. I guess women do not have a "high-tech mobile lifestyle."
Slashdot Mirror
This case may be many things, but it is not a tort case. Rest assured that the ability of corporations to sue to protect what they claim is their property will never be limited.
See the definition of stalking: 1. To pursue by tracking stealthily. 2. To follow or observe (a person) persistently, especially out of obsession or derangement. 3. To go through (an area) in pursuit of prey or quarry. Luskin spends a lot of time writing about Krugman. I think Krugman (and Atrios) were using the term as in number 2 above.
What you want is slow glass . You leave it in a nice spot, and ten years later you put it in your window frame. The light takes ten years to pass through the glass, and you have ten years of views.
You are both wrong. The full 10-Q does discuss the German case. See below. A registrant must discuss all material litigation. It does not matter whether the litigation involves a subsidiary or the parent, so long as it is material to the entire enterprise.
From the 10Q: "Several entities in Germany have obtained temporary restraining orders in Germany precluding SCO GmbH, the Company's German subsidiary, in substance, from making statements in Germany that disparage Linux, or entities involved in the Linux business, or implicate Linux as infringing the Company's intellectual property rights. SCO GmbH has received an administrative fine of 10,000 Euro for a technical violation of one of the temporary restraining orders. The Company is currently negotiating with the various claimants in Germany over the temporary restraining orders and is evaluating whether it will appeal the administrative fine."
In fact, the thrust of the articles is that Powers was too sympathetic to Heisenberg, and that in fact he would have developed the Bomb had he been able.
See the new Dockers "mobile pant". According to the company, "The Mobile Pant is keeping in step with the needs of men and their high-tech, mobile lifestyle by providing them with a stylish way of carrying the tools of their trade." I'm not sure you can fit a textbook in them though. And apparently they are only for men. I guess women do not have a "high-tech mobile lifestyle."