I have used resellerratings in the past and have found that the ratings generally represent what is REALLY going on at the company. The fact of the matter is that you have really managed to piss off the majority of your customers. 7 of the 8 respondants have mentioned that they received rude service.
Nevertheless, a 1.7 out of 7.0 rating on resellerratings shows me what kind of company you really are.
Red Hat tried to do an X-based install with RedHat 3.0.3. It didn't really work that well, from what I saw of it. Just stick with character-based installs, much easier to ensure compatibility with.
I have used resellerratings in the past and have found that the ratings generally represent what is REALLY going on at the company. The fact of the matter is that you have really managed to piss off the majority of your customers. 7 of the 8 respondants have mentioned that they received rude service.
Nevertheless, a 1.7 out of 7.0 rating on resellerratings shows me what kind of company you really are.
I myself don't vote. It only encourages them.
Then you have no right to complain at all about the current elected officials. Stuff it.
I myself don't vote. It only encourages them.
Then you have no right to complain at all about the current elected officials. Stuff it.
I'm 476. :-)
"Although van Kempen has been using Linux since 1989..."
Um, since version 0.01 of Linux came out in 1991, I find this rather hard to believe.
This guy picked up on the y2k hysteria bandwagon and lost what respect I had for him. Blech.
Didn't some of these guys start out at apogee, then to id, and then to ion storm?
Red Hat tried to do an X-based install with RedHat 3.0.3. It didn't really work that well, from what I saw of it. Just stick with character-based installs, much easier to ensure compatibility with.