trades are dead. We don't need any more of those people.
We need to extract every bit of intelligence we have hidden in the masses and then throw the rest in the incinerator.
We need people who can do things that machines can never do in order to grow our economy. Too bad we've spent the last thousand+ years making everyone as stupid as possible on purpose.
Why are you so stupid to talk about Donald Trump when the problem is the system he works for? How are you better than the people you talk down to when you are both transfixed by the bouncing red ball, even if for different reasons?
What's astounding is your devotion to deluding yourself into believing you are better than other people. By choosing a context where neither side will be proved wrong, you feel safe in your judgement from afar, never having to put yourself to the test and seriously entertain any potential refutation.
You are naive like a middle school boy writing a paper for his teacher
What does happiness matter at all? You say it's your favorite thing, but how do you prove you like it more than suffering? You can say it all you want, but that's no proof or explanation.
The greatest satisfaction for a human is not happiness. It is the application of all of his faculties, instinctual, learned, and self-taught, the product of the potential for human intelligence, that gives him satisfaction even when he suffers. So it is with all creatures. They are satisfied because of the fruit of their suffering.
Maybe everything you say as applicable and true, but not without some work around it. People will need another compulsory activity besides work, and it can't be watching TV or playing video games. People need a REAL challenge or they start to go insane and getting fixated on grotesque, cheap substitutes for things that provide fulfillment (like 99.99% of everyone you ever see in your life).
Why are you so stupid to talk about Donald Trump when the problem is the system he works for? How are you better than the people you talk down to when you are both transfixed by the bouncing red ball, even if for different reasons?
What's astounding is your devotion to deluding yourself into believing you are better than other people. By choosing a context where neither side will be proved wrong, you feel safe in your judgement from afar, never having to put yourself to the test and seriously entertain any potential refutation.
Echo chamber zombies. You fell for the biggest most obvious trick in the world. Bright lights, color, and screaming noise, you never questioned it for more than a minute. And meanwhile you sabotage and abandon your instincts and common sense.
Why are you so stupid to talk about Donald Trump when the problem is the system he works for? How are you better than the people you talk down to when you are both transfixed by the bouncing red ball, even if for different reasons?
yes you do like work at things from the "dictionary" end don't you, not so much the "having a coherent view of the world and rendering it into speech" end though.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. You forget psychology is real when you have something you want to believe.
I think you're forgetting a fundamental rule of human existence. I choose to render it as "people say all kinds of shit". Hearsay is not evidence. It doesn't matter how many people say it, there are too many potential reasons for them to lie.
And yet I point out an incredibly obvious proof which no one will attempt and you refuse to even acknowledge because "everyone already knows the truth we don't need no evidence or rational thought"
The issue of the holocaust is far beside the point: peoples' minds are broken. They have zero attention span for rational thought. This makes them nothing but extensions of the will of their leaders/controllers/owners. They will do, say, and believe anything their superior wills on them.
Hearsay used to be a good hint as to the truth. That age is gone. "Where there's smoke there's fire" is expired. People have been stripped of their independent nature. You can't trust anything anyone says outside the traditional scope of human life.
If everyone saw Jimmy punch the cop at the party that's one thing. If everyone saw Hitler make a conspiracy to take over the world and exterminate all non blue-eyed whites, then you know everyone is insane because you can't just spot something like that. You have to put it together from an immense body of evidence.
AAAHHHH! I keep hearing the phrase "Russian Hackers" and it keeps triggering my memory of the Russian Hackers that hacked the voting machines and made Hillary lose! Why is this real?
I don't understand how you've conflated things to believe that is any kind of counter
What there needs to be is archeological evidence. The standard for proof of murder is a corpse. Where are the millions of burnt corpses? How is it that the sites for dumping of remains have not been identified? Why aren't they made into memorials? If everything is so well documented the finding of these sites should be easy.
also what are you even talking about? You just dropped some buzz phrases and rambled about some half-baked conjecture? I wouldn't say anything but i've seen you make many uninteresting poorly thought out comments that have also been moderated up. And I often see the same people of a small group with similarly uninterested and poorly thought out comments being modded up. Funny stuff.
And yet the evangelists hesitate to bring any proof of this documentation.
It's almost like their outrage at skepticism was designed to prevent too many rational people from contemplating the evidence.
People like to have things dragged down to their level. But this is utter insanity; you can't demonize people,;et alone those who are closely related to you, without thoroughly investigating the matter for yourself. You have to serve justice to your fellow man, you have to do due diligence to investigate your own character, and you need to be informed to deal with politics.
But all of this turns out to be too much work for people who have all their physical needs taken care of and nothing at all to do really. They would rather be entertained than to think about anything "yucky".
Were things so bad as this before the war? What really were the sides? Did another kind of Nazi win despite Germany's fall?
but the credibility of these people is utterly destroyed by the political pressures surrounding the supposed events. Not to mention that they are advocating for the side that won. With most people it's like they totally forget that psychology exists and is based on real patterns of human behavior....at least they forget it completely when there is something they want to believe but don't have the evidence to come to a rational conclusion.
It's not Germany. It's their occupation government that is punishing them for resisting the new world order.
BUT NO. THAT'S TROLLING, THAT'S FLAMEBAIT, everyone can clearly see that the countries who resisted in world war 2 are treated fairly in all respects compared to allied countries
you are incredibly naive....its like you think politics should be taken at face value
obama isn't retarded. you aren't some sage with one eye above the clouds.
he's managing the people. telling them what they want to hear because they were told to want to hear it. the utterly retarded and insane people who supported of one manufactured political view are becoming dysfunctional to some degree. Statements like this hedge against these people becoming unproductive due to their dissatisfaction with the appearance of their surroundings. Their emotional/subconscious mind has realized their view of the world is totally insane and false. They need to be put back in line before that realization hits their consciousness
He's prodding the depressed hamsters to get back on the wheel.
"designed to do specific political damage" What indication is there that it was "designed"?
What is this specific political damage?
"That there are actual pedophiles in Washington is utterly and completely irrelevant." To what? Your blinders-on narrative? Unless you want to argue that federal governance is totally irrelevant to our lives, or that pedophilia is harmless, you aren't making sense.
So stories of actual, prosecuted, pedophilia among our leaders are for some reason insignificant because you cherry-picked an easy target as an excuse to bring up an irrelevant topic as an example for your support of fake news?
It's not deliberately fabricated. People are confused about the greater context of things that is opening up to them in the information age. There is consensus information that supports this kind of sentiment. They aren't stupid for keeping these things in mind. They just need to learn how to handle it.
"Warning labels aren't censorship." uh....yes they are
surely there is some ancient argument that could be brought up with movie/video game/music ratings?
They ensure that certain people do not view certain things. That is censorship. Just because the group of certain people is ill-defined doesn't mean it counts for no one. It creates schism in the public forum. That is the ultimate goal of all censorship. Divide and conquer.
"If you don't want a warning label don't create fake made up shit." Your automatic faith in the review process is totally irrational. It's too bad thoughtless comments like yours are modded up.
But why do you assume that "fact checking" has any integrity? Who gets to decide what is fact and what is not and what burden of proof is on them? Why is the traditional system of people deciding for themselves what is true and what is not suddenly obsolete?
It's not a few pieces of "bullshit" floating around that is perverting democracy.
It's the purposeful mis-education of the masses.
The elephant in the room that no one is mentioning anywhere, because it is so forbidden to say, is that the public is literally stunted in their mental growth. In other words, they are stupid. They are likely to believe things they here without any rational analysis. They are used to believing things they hear because of the pressure to fit into a competitive society. They don't have the ability to analyze things under this kind of pressure.
It used to be that this all worked fine because the media was under tight control. The vast majority of what people would hear through "official-seeming" sources would be nothing other than the official narrative. Now, with the internet being everywhere, forces other than the establishment are able to have a say also.
The beer-hall talk of days past is now being broadcast, and it is causing problems for the establishment. And it isn't all 'drunken nonsense'. It's rooted in people's experience, and that enough is some justification for it to be called true.
Advocating for anyone to have a license to decide for everyone what is true and what is not is utter insanity. Being tempted to jump to a conclusion because it seems like "it would be for the best" is not an excuse. In life you often have to choose between strength and death, though in the modern world death seems suspended forever. This is one of those choices, and in this case, death is not that far off. Freedom is at stake here. If it falls now it may never rise again.
"Facebook is a private organization, and has the right to remove any content they want to" A legal right but not a moral right. That will work against them eventually.
"Don't like it, go use some other social networking platform." Facebook is not some genius invention. It is the people who use it that make it; the product itself contributes nothing but space. It's an interface to a public forum. Why should it be censored?
I guess your argument boils down to "THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHY, JUST DEAL WITH IT"
You are a cancer here. Your moronic blabbering is always modded up wherever you comment. This is evidence of the complete corruption of the moderation here which is directly controlled by the editors. It's too bad the users of this site continue to be unaware that this site is a propaganda device from top to bottom.
Slashdot Mirror
are you like, dumb?
trades are dead. We don't need any more of those people.
We need to extract every bit of intelligence we have hidden in the masses and then throw the rest in the incinerator.
We need people who can do things that machines can never do in order to grow our economy.
Too bad we've spent the last thousand+ years making everyone as stupid as possible on purpose.
Why are you so stupid to talk about Donald Trump when the problem is the system he works for? How are you better than the people you talk down to when you are both transfixed by the bouncing red ball, even if for different reasons?
What's astounding is your devotion to deluding yourself into believing you are better than other people. By choosing a context where neither side will be proved wrong, you feel safe in your judgement from afar, never having to put yourself to the test and seriously entertain any potential refutation.
You are naive like a middle school boy writing a paper for his teacher
What does happiness matter at all? You say it's your favorite thing, but how do you prove you like it more than suffering? You can say it all you want, but that's no proof or explanation.
The greatest satisfaction for a human is not happiness. It is the application of all of his faculties, instinctual, learned, and self-taught, the product of the potential for human intelligence, that gives him satisfaction even when he suffers.
So it is with all creatures. They are satisfied because of the fruit of their suffering.
Maybe everything you say as applicable and true, but not without some work around it. People will need another compulsory activity besides work, and it can't be watching TV or playing video games. People need a REAL challenge or they start to go insane and getting fixated on grotesque, cheap substitutes for things that provide fulfillment (like 99.99% of everyone you ever see in your life).
Why are you so stupid to talk about Donald Trump when the problem is the system he works for? How are you better than the people you talk down to when you are both transfixed by the bouncing red ball, even if for different reasons?
What's astounding is your devotion to deluding yourself into believing you are better than other people. By choosing a context where neither side will be proved wrong, you feel safe in your judgement from afar, never having to put yourself to the test and seriously entertain any potential refutation.
Echo chamber zombies. You fell for the biggest most obvious trick in the world. Bright lights, color, and screaming noise, you never questioned it for more than a minute. And meanwhile you sabotage and abandon your instincts and common sense.
Why are you so stupid to talk about Donald Trump when the problem is the system he works for? How are you better than the people you talk down to when you are both transfixed by the bouncing red ball, even if for different reasons?
yes you do like work at things from the "dictionary" end don't you, not so much the "having a coherent view of the world and rendering it into speech" end though.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. You forget psychology is real when you have something you want to believe.
I think you're forgetting a fundamental rule of human existence. I choose to render it as "people say all kinds of shit".
Hearsay is not evidence.
It doesn't matter how many people say it, there are too many potential reasons for them to lie.
And yet I point out an incredibly obvious proof which no one will attempt and you refuse to even acknowledge because "everyone already knows the truth we don't need no evidence or rational thought"
The issue of the holocaust is far beside the point: peoples' minds are broken. They have zero attention span for rational thought. This makes them nothing but extensions of the will of their leaders/controllers/owners. They will do, say, and believe anything their superior wills on them.
Hearsay used to be a good hint as to the truth. That age is gone. "Where there's smoke there's fire" is expired. People have been stripped of their independent nature. You can't trust anything anyone says outside the traditional scope of human life.
If everyone saw Jimmy punch the cop at the party that's one thing.
If everyone saw Hitler make a conspiracy to take over the world and exterminate all non blue-eyed whites, then you know everyone is insane because you can't just spot something like that. You have to put it together from an immense body of evidence.
AAAHHHH! I keep hearing the phrase "Russian Hackers" and it keeps triggering my memory of the Russian Hackers that hacked the voting machines and made Hillary lose! Why is this real?
I don't understand how you've conflated things to believe that is any kind of counter
What there needs to be is archeological evidence. The standard for proof of murder is a corpse. Where are the millions of burnt corpses? How is it that the sites for dumping of remains have not been identified? Why aren't they made into memorials? If everything is so well documented the finding of these sites should be easy.
what are you, some kind of wizard?
another popular name with an uninteresting comment. corrupt moderation.
define delusion. define reality. how do you know the difference?
Good advice. It's just that it takes intelligence to accept and use this advice, which most people do not have to begin with.
People are not being bred for intelligence or independent thought. They are being bred to listen to and believe authority.
You can't tell people to be smart when society is designed to make them stupid. When society depends on these people being stupid to function.
echo chamber
Dunning-Kreuger
neo-Nazi
you are a good boy aren't you?
also what are you even talking about? You just dropped some buzz phrases and rambled about some half-baked conjecture?
I wouldn't say anything but i've seen you make many uninteresting poorly thought out comments that have also been moderated up.
And I often see the same people of a small group with similarly uninterested and poorly thought out comments being modded up.
Funny stuff.
And yet the evangelists hesitate to bring any proof of this documentation.
It's almost like their outrage at skepticism was designed to prevent too many rational people from contemplating the evidence.
People like to have things dragged down to their level. But this is utter insanity; you can't demonize people, ;et alone those who are closely related to you, without thoroughly investigating the matter for yourself. You have to serve justice to your fellow man, you have to do due diligence to investigate your own character, and you need to be informed to deal with politics.
But all of this turns out to be too much work for people who have all their physical needs taken care of and nothing at all to do really. They would rather be entertained than to think about anything "yucky".
Were things so bad as this before the war? What really were the sides? Did another kind of Nazi win despite Germany's fall?
"This is a different kind of history, a new kind of history. It's special and important so it has special rules about it."
All that is needed to quiet the minds of most people with rational tendencies.
but the credibility of these people is utterly destroyed by the political pressures surrounding the supposed events. Not to mention that they are advocating for the side that won. With most people it's like they totally forget that psychology exists and is based on real patterns of human behavior....at least they forget it completely when there is something they want to believe but don't have the evidence to come to a rational conclusion.
It's not Germany. It's their occupation government that is punishing them for resisting the new world order.
BUT NO. THAT'S TROLLING, THAT'S FLAMEBAIT, everyone can clearly see that the countries who resisted in world war 2 are treated fairly in all respects compared to allied countries
you are incredibly naive....its like you think politics should be taken at face value
obama isn't retarded. you aren't some sage with one eye above the clouds.
he's managing the people. telling them what they want to hear because they were told to want to hear it. the utterly retarded and insane people who supported of one manufactured political view are becoming dysfunctional to some degree. Statements like this hedge against these people becoming unproductive due to their dissatisfaction with the appearance of their surroundings.
Their emotional/subconscious mind has realized their view of the world is totally insane and false. They need to be put back in line before that realization hits their consciousness
He's prodding the depressed hamsters to get back on the wheel.
"designed to do specific political damage"
What indication is there that it was "designed"?
What is this specific political damage?
"That there are actual pedophiles in Washington is utterly and completely irrelevant."
To what? Your blinders-on narrative? Unless you want to argue that federal governance is totally irrelevant to our lives, or that pedophilia is harmless, you aren't making sense.
What? I guess you got caught off guard with a total upheaval of your premise and just defaulted to some kind of non-sense retort
But maybe Snopes works for the same people who Donald Rumsfeld works for, directly or indirectly? Who could say?
So stories of actual, prosecuted, pedophilia among our leaders are for some reason insignificant because you cherry-picked an easy target as an excuse to bring up an irrelevant topic as an example for your support of fake news?
It's not deliberately fabricated. People are confused about the greater context of things that is opening up to them in the information age. There is consensus information that supports this kind of sentiment. They aren't stupid for keeping these things in mind. They just need to learn how to handle it.
"Warning labels aren't censorship."
uh....yes they are
surely there is some ancient argument that could be brought up with movie/video game/music ratings?
They ensure that certain people do not view certain things. That is censorship. Just because the group of certain people is ill-defined doesn't mean it counts for no one.
It creates schism in the public forum. That is the ultimate goal of all censorship. Divide and conquer.
"If you don't want a warning label don't create fake made up shit."
Your automatic faith in the review process is totally irrational. It's too bad thoughtless comments like yours are modded up.
But why do you assume that "fact checking" has any integrity? Who gets to decide what is fact and what is not and what burden of proof is on them?
Why is the traditional system of people deciding for themselves what is true and what is not suddenly obsolete?
"Nice trolling" indeed.
It's not a few pieces of "bullshit" floating around that is perverting democracy.
It's the purposeful mis-education of the masses.
The elephant in the room that no one is mentioning anywhere, because it is so forbidden to say, is that the public is literally stunted in their mental growth. In other words, they are stupid. They are likely to believe things they here without any rational analysis. They are used to believing things they hear because of the pressure to fit into a competitive society. They don't have the ability to analyze things under this kind of pressure.
It used to be that this all worked fine because the media was under tight control. The vast majority of what people would hear through "official-seeming" sources would be nothing other than the official narrative. Now, with the internet being everywhere, forces other than the establishment are able to have a say also.
The beer-hall talk of days past is now being broadcast, and it is causing problems for the establishment.
And it isn't all 'drunken nonsense'. It's rooted in people's experience, and that enough is some justification for it to be called true.
Advocating for anyone to have a license to decide for everyone what is true and what is not is utter insanity.
Being tempted to jump to a conclusion because it seems like "it would be for the best" is not an excuse.
In life you often have to choose between strength and death, though in the modern world death seems suspended forever.
This is one of those choices, and in this case, death is not that far off.
Freedom is at stake here. If it falls now it may never rise again.
"Facebook is a private organization, and has the right to remove any content they want to"
A legal right but not a moral right. That will work against them eventually.
"Don't like it, go use some other social networking platform."
Facebook is not some genius invention. It is the people who use it that make it; the product itself contributes nothing but space. It's an interface to a public forum. Why should it be censored?
I guess your argument boils down to "THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHY, JUST DEAL WITH IT"
You are a cancer here. Your moronic blabbering is always modded up wherever you comment. This is evidence of the complete corruption of the moderation here which is directly controlled by the editors. It's too bad the users of this site continue to be unaware that this site is a propaganda device from top to bottom.