It is because using Smalltalk does not makes you productive per se.
You need to learn to think in objects, beacuse you can use Smalltalk as any scripting language or hybrids like Python.
Then you make no difference at all. It will be the same crap with different syntactic sugar.
"What makes or breaks a language is its libraries"
No. Think about Delphi. Tons of libs, nobody using it now. Or even C.
Is not in the libraries, it's in the mind of the programmer!!
You all want to blame the libs, but the fault for not success is in us, not in the libraries.
(from a Smalltalk developer since 20 years)
Slashdot Mirror
It is because using Smalltalk does not makes you productive per se. You need to learn to think in objects, beacuse you can use Smalltalk as any scripting language or hybrids like Python. Then you make no difference at all. It will be the same crap with different syntactic sugar. "What makes or breaks a language is its libraries" No. Think about Delphi. Tons of libs, nobody using it now. Or even C. Is not in the libraries, it's in the mind of the programmer!! You all want to blame the libs, but the fault for not success is in us, not in the libraries. (from a Smalltalk developer since 20 years)
No. scripting languages doesn't have live coding by definition. Please research papers about Liveness before commenting here.