Yet we are supposed to believe that powerful agencies with no oversight aren't? The NSA's first concern is to make NSA operators rich and dominant over the peasantry.
When interviewed the boys said they were not drowning but distressed because the drone is used to spot sharks and it scared them. The price is also being kept a secret.
There is a lot of viral marketing on this. Someone is working really hard to builk the government of hundreds of thousands and potentially millions of dollars.
What do you have to say about sightings that are caught on radar? Or mass sightings like the one over Phoenix? Even if 99.9% is bullshit there is still a chance that the last.1% is real.
It is not smart to be so damn sure of something that you put blinders on.
I will be skeptical until they release the evidence that convinced him so I can see for myself if it is a logical conclusion. But I'm not going to assume that there can't be aliens.
That would really be throwing the baby out with the bath water. When people say the CIA is corrupt, or can't be trusted it doesn't mean that they are all comic book villains. It is enough that bad actors have enough sway within the organization to do terrible things. Just like a cop won't cross the blue line a spook won't blow a whistle.
The government is too big and grows bigger every election cycle as the new guy pays off his voters with government handouts. There is nothing wrong with shrinking the government.
We already have the CIA, NSA, etc. The president changes, these guys stay the same. They are far more dangerous than anything Trump can do in his 4 years.
It may be possible to write an AI that does really well on IQ tests. That would not invalidate the validity of the test on humans nor prove that the AI is more intelligent than a human. IQ tests predict success in humans, they may not in AI.
What a ridiculous statement. Your assumption of people's intelligence is meaningless. Unless you tested people with a valid IQ test you could not even begin to learn anything about IQ. People who do that consistently find the opposite.
What it tests for is shown to make accurate predictions of important things. That is all that matters. No one is saying that it measures a person's worth, or the full extent of their intellect. There is no problem with what it is, only with what people misinterpret it to be.
IQ results are proven to predict success in a lot of things. Thinking that IQ does not measure intelligence is a sign of low IQ. You can go ahead and argue that there are other types of intelligence, but that argument does little other than conflate skills with intelligence.
IQ measures your ability to solve problems. IQ tests a are reproducible, consistent, and predictive.
That so many people write it off as pseudoscience proves only how stupid most people are.
Slashdot Mirror
Yet we are supposed to believe that powerful agencies with no oversight aren't? The NSA's first concern is to make NSA operators rich and dominant over the peasantry.
When interviewed the boys said they were not drowning but distressed because the drone is used to spot sharks and it scared them. The price is also being kept a secret. There is a lot of viral marketing on this. Someone is working really hard to builk the government of hundreds of thousands and potentially millions of dollars.
This is clearly written by a highschooler at 7 am because it's due at 8 but they didn't even research yet.
What do you have to say about sightings that are caught on radar? Or mass sightings like the one over Phoenix? Even if 99.9% is bullshit there is still a chance that the last .1% is real.
It is not smart to be so damn sure of something that you put blinders on.
I will be skeptical until they release the evidence that convinced him so I can see for myself if it is a logical conclusion. But I'm not going to assume that there can't be aliens.
Read the article. He plainly states that he calls them UFOs for lack of a better term and that they do not belong to anyone on earth.
The one they wrote or none at all.
The government should never force people to use a system that is patented. That creates a government enforced monopoly.
I'm pretty sure Republicans would love to pass laws that punish mothers who do that to their kids, it's the democrats who would prevent it.
Apparently you can even use it for classified documents.
That would really be throwing the baby out with the bath water. When people say the CIA is corrupt, or can't be trusted it doesn't mean that they are all comic book villains. It is enough that bad actors have enough sway within the organization to do terrible things. Just like a cop won't cross the blue line a spook won't blow a whistle.
The government is too big and grows bigger every election cycle as the new guy pays off his voters with government handouts. There is nothing wrong with shrinking the government.
We already have the CIA, NSA, etc. The president changes, these guys stay the same. They are far more dangerous than anything Trump can do in his 4 years.
It may be possible to write an AI that does really well on IQ tests. That would not invalidate the validity of the test on humans nor prove that the AI is more intelligent than a human. IQ tests predict success in humans, they may not in AI.
What a ridiculous statement. Your assumption of people's intelligence is meaningless. Unless you tested people with a valid IQ test you could not even begin to learn anything about IQ. People who do that consistently find the opposite.
What it tests for is shown to make accurate predictions of important things. That is all that matters. No one is saying that it measures a person's worth, or the full extent of their intellect. There is no problem with what it is, only with what people misinterpret it to be.
IQ results are proven to predict success in a lot of things. Thinking that IQ does not measure intelligence is a sign of low IQ. You can go ahead and argue that there are other types of intelligence, but that argument does little other than conflate skills with intelligence. IQ measures your ability to solve problems. IQ tests a are reproducible, consistent, and predictive. That so many people write it off as pseudoscience proves only how stupid most people are.