As far as I can tell the essay is just a modernized version of the marxist capitalist-overproduction catastrophe that has consistently been 10-20 years away for the last ~150 years.
I don't know if they claim that massive tax increases to fund a wealth-redistribution scheme will somehow stimulate the economy and massively increase the GDP so as to pay for itself, though. I doubt even hardcore collectivists are that, er, misinformed.
That sounds like the way a C++ destructor is used with the "Resource Acquisition is Initialization" model. You'd open a file by creating an object on the stack, and the destructor would close the file-handle once control returns (or the object is deleted, if on the heap)
// some_file_object is a hypothetical file i/o object with manual open(), close(), write(), etc. functions
It's sort of inside-out relative to the ruby version becuase it doesn't use the closure, but the useage is near-identical:
{
File file( "foo" );
file.write( "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." ); }// close happens here, or at the throw/return/break/continue site, if any
new/delete just being another open/close pair to be avoided or contained away in a small object when practical, so it reduces the benefit gained from GC use.
Congress doesn't write laws, congress passes laws. Anyone can write a law, and many of them come straight from the white house, or through white-house aligned senators/congressmen.
And IIRC, the Vatican edict is that Sen. Kerry should be denied communion by the local church authorities, they're the ones breaking the rules, not him. If he's offered communion he can (must?) take it.
If the attacker gets the pad itself, OTP is completely broken. That's why you have to be careful about destroying it when you're done and why OTP is such a useless scheme.
Bush refused to sign the treaty for the International Criminal Court
Clinton signed the ICC treaty. There is no chance in hell that it will pass the Senate, and he didn't even try. Bush wasn't interested in getting it passed either, and withdrew from the unratified treaty.
But add to this the fact that we are currently seeing a mass extinction unlike anything in the last 65 million years, and you've got quite a conspicious coincidence.
I would think the sudden extinction might have more to do with humans covering the earth with agriculture and hunting, putting roads through, and living in much of the rest...
But isn't that a sign that the shorters think this is the lowest price SCOX will be at for a while -- so pretty much the same thing as for any other buying?
Cultures aren't people, they're things, and when they no longer justify the costs of their own existence, they should go away. It's wrong to save a culture at the expense of the people in it, if they'd rather be doing something else.
Languages, for example, are dying out all the time, and that's a shame, but keeping a language alive is a tremendous amount of work, and people won't do it unless there's some benefit to them (like being able to communicate with a large group of other people)
However... the day I see an electorate in a "culturally different" country freely and democratically vote for a regime that restricts human rights, I'll change my mind.
People do that all the time. Restricting the other guy's rights is one of the more popular political themes of the world--Both in the West and in the "Culturally Different" places. Democracy is useful, but it's not a magic wand that makes authoritarianism disappear.
Fascinating. I suppose you think you live in a country with free speech due to some sort of virtue on your part? Perhaps you have managed to overthrow a dictatorial government and replace it with a liberal one yourself?
Wouldn't sending random connections at a server (whatever qualifies as a 'knock') interfere with anyone else completing a pattern to open a port?
If you want people to have to authenticate without revealing what services you're running, couldn't you just do a real (unlike replayable, sniffable plaintext like this) authentication one-way over UDP? That doesn't give anything away either, and is much less hokey.
It could even run on a well-known port... Is there already a UDP authentication protocol, or would one have to be designed?
How does this make things any simpler? The tax bracket system is not a big, confusing thing, particularly since it's implemented as a lookup table. But it's only one step in the entire big process of calculating taxes.
Changing the shape of the tax curve will not "Save tons of time" or "lower operating costs".
Slashdot Mirror
As far as I can tell the essay is just a modernized version of the marxist capitalist-overproduction catastrophe that has consistently been 10-20 years away for the last ~150 years.
I don't know if they claim that massive tax increases to fund a wealth-redistribution scheme will somehow stimulate the economy and massively increase the GDP so as to pay for itself, though. I doubt even hardcore collectivists are that, er, misinformed.
Congress doesn't write laws, congress passes laws. Anyone can write a law, and many of them come straight from the white house, or through white-house aligned senators/congressmen.
And IIRC, the Vatican edict is that Sen. Kerry should be denied communion by the local church authorities, they're the ones breaking the rules, not him. If he's offered communion he can (must?) take it.
If the attacker gets the pad itself, OTP is completely broken. That's why you have to be careful about destroying it when you're done and why OTP is such a useless scheme.
Bush refused to sign the treaty for the International Criminal Court
Clinton signed the ICC treaty. There is no chance in hell that it will pass the Senate, and he didn't even try. Bush wasn't interested in getting it passed either, and withdrew from the unratified treaty.
Not having to worry about losing my DRM key or a random "software update" breaking my DRM and locking me out of my music.
Burining to CD in a manner of my choice instead of jumping through hoops.
Can biodiesel produce anywhere near enough energy to replace crude oil mining?
But add to this the fact that we are currently seeing a mass extinction unlike anything in the last 65 million years, and you've got quite a conspicious coincidence.
I would think the sudden extinction might have more to do with humans covering the earth with agriculture and hunting, putting roads through, and living in much of the rest...
Because, you know, nobody ever throws bullshit claims they can't enforce in a TOS.
But isn't that a sign that the shorters think this is the lowest price SCOX will be at for a while -- so pretty much the same thing as for any other buying?
Since when are images of illegal activities illegal? Seems like that would put a crimp in the news business...
Whatever you say, Trotsky.
Cultures aren't people, they're things, and when they no longer justify the costs of their own existence, they should go away. It's wrong to save a culture at the expense of the people in it, if they'd rather be doing something else.
Languages, for example, are dying out all the time, and that's a shame, but keeping a language alive is a tremendous amount of work, and people won't do it unless there's some benefit to them (like being able to communicate with a large group of other people)
How is The Memory Hole an example of censorship? It looks to me like the exact opposite.
Er, except right now they're a anti-western fundamentalist state run by a ruling royal family.
Fascinating. I suppose you think you live in a country with free speech due to some sort of virtue on your part? Perhaps you have managed to overthrow a dictatorial government and replace it with a liberal one yourself?
Wouldn't sending random connections at a server (whatever qualifies as a 'knock') interfere with anyone else completing a pattern to open a port?
If you want people to have to authenticate without revealing what services you're running, couldn't you just do a real (unlike replayable, sniffable plaintext like this) authentication one-way over UDP? That doesn't give anything away either, and is much less hokey.
It could even run on a well-known port... Is there already a UDP authentication protocol, or would one have to be designed?
It's a use tax: the tax is not on taking things into the state, it's a tax on using the thing, regardless of where it was obtained from.
Since you already pay the tax on things you bought in-state, you don't have to pay it again.
There's no Constitutional restriction against that.
How does this make things any simpler? The tax bracket system is not a big, confusing thing, particularly since it's implemented as a lookup table. But it's only one step in the entire big process of calculating taxes.
Changing the shape of the tax curve will not "Save tons of time" or "lower operating costs".
Your comment is meaningless gibberish studded with technobabble.
I believe you, you must really work at Microsoft.
A recumbent. Trailing 20 feet of blue fabric.
That's easy, modify the bumpers a bit and have the cars run touching each other.
No delta-v == no problem.
Naah, this is happening every few months, and he would want to drum again in about an hour.
I'm an American too, but I've never heard of a law like that.