If your job is being handed off after a training/etc. period, the job is effectively gone at that point. Should one wish to quit, they should be able to quit without fear of losing unemployment eligibility, any pre-existing good reputation, or any other negative consequence of refusing training. Any retaliation, no matter how minor or subtle is to be met with severe penalties (read: ones that discourage offshoring) towards the company and any involved contractors.
Given that the salaries are already $14k-$29k +/- regional adjustments for TSO's, what makes the private contractors any better? You're going to get even less motivated individuals given that contractors would expect a cut out of the already-abysmally low wage, never mind the higher instability of a contract job.
Given some of Twitter's investors and their lack of removal of ISIS/pro-Islamist material - while eagerly purging sources of inconvenient truths (e.g. Milo Y.) - should be enough proof of their loyalties.
Traditionally unreliable sources (like blogs and social media) are treated like gospel when it comes from leftists. Same sources, same material, same conversation, wrong person == unreliable in the SOCJUS world, even if it is fact.
It's been played the same time over and over. Perhaps it's you that should reconsider repeating your lies a thousand times.
Twitter has gone from openness to protection of the leftist message with these updates.
If you're a minority, a certain leftist bent, or even a terrorist, they will let you harass to your heart's content. If you're anyone else, you get called on it.
Lots of people are incapable of thinking like the owner of a business
That doesn't mean you imply they're wrong for not having the proper perspective.
As an owner, having fewer admin grunts means more money to reinvest in higher-return activities (which as an employee you can help drive, if you're so inclined) and/or return to shareholders, who, after all, own the damn business and expect something from it.
When your wings melt from flying in rarified air, don't be surprised when people cheer.
But this hard-nosed perspective, for some reason, strikes people as cruel, or you're viewed as the villain or whatever.
The problem is that they're right.
It's just how the world works and you have to adapt accordingly, even if it's annoying and extra work at times.
So you support the fraud and abuse that devalues citizenship of a First World country? You are the problem and deserve anything coming to you that stops it.
Clearly if the visa program did not exist companies would be forced to hire the maybe less qualified US workers
That is the only valid goal, since the citizen would more likely be qualified for a given role than his non-citizen equivalent. If we're going to have "less qualified" people in there anyway, why not have them be our own?
The problem is that people in the US tend to be much more complacent about living up to that greatness than highly motivated people in other countries.
In general, we don't believe in being made desperate. Lack of desperation is not to be mistaken as "complacency". The US standard of living truly is not negotiable.
For the ones that are real and hire citizens, employers are getting way too picky.
Training
The only training done these days is for non-citizen entities. Anyone else is required to satisfy the entitlement mentality of an employer's unrealistic qualifications.
Get rid of the program and its enabling acts. Hard, but that's what has to happen. It, along with every single other program of its class, solely exists for fraud and abuse - and that anything else is a convenient side effect. Whether it is the US, Australia, Germany, the UK, or any other country free enough to need a supply of perpetually desperate labor, the purpose remains unchanged.
Naturally, this might be an issue with the pro-hellhole, anti-citizen part of/. that justifies it as "competitiveness". These people are largely outside the US and have no business in doing anything other than learning that it will happen to them.
People don't just die naturally or accidentally for having too much knowledge about their employer. Never mind that the reflexive excuses seem to come out when people dare question what happened.
The only reason they ever bothered is that some people of means were hurt by the lack of it. They don't care about ordinary people or what happens to them.
Slashdot Mirror
If your job is being handed off after a training/etc. period, the job is effectively gone at that point. Should one wish to quit, they should be able to quit without fear of losing unemployment eligibility, any pre-existing good reputation, or any other negative consequence of refusing training. Any retaliation, no matter how minor or subtle is to be met with severe penalties (read: ones that discourage offshoring) towards the company and any involved contractors.
No phone jack makes it a non-starter.
Hopefully Android phones have the sanity to keep theirs.
More than the adjustment in pay for being San Francisco?
This is just another deflection off of the painful truth about Clinton's corrupt activities.
Besides, isn't the DNC and the media the greater threat wrt their attempts to smear, silence or bribe opponents?
Given that the salaries are already $14k-$29k +/- regional adjustments for TSO's, what makes the private contractors any better? You're going to get even less motivated individuals given that contractors would expect a cut out of the already-abysmally low wage, never mind the higher instability of a contract job.
Given some of Twitter's investors and their lack of removal of ISIS/pro-Islamist material - while eagerly purging sources of inconvenient truths (e.g. Milo Y.) - should be enough proof of their loyalties.
How many of these results in citizens being hired versus non-citizens? Not enough.
If the guest worker programs are any guide, these individuals would just hire from likeminded non-citizens.
How about taking care of Mylan first instead of letting them off the hook?
How else would they figure out how efficiently and effectively suppress conservative content while retaining SOCJUS adherents?
Traditionally unreliable sources (like blogs and social media) are treated like gospel when it comes from leftists. Same sources, same material, same conversation, wrong person == unreliable in the SOCJUS world, even if it is fact.
It's been played the same time over and over. Perhaps it's you that should reconsider repeating your lies a thousand times.
Doesn't work that way. Oh, and get your facts straight, since Nyberg is a different person.
Twitter has gone from openness to protection of the leftist message with these updates.
If you're a minority, a certain leftist bent, or even a terrorist, they will let you harass to your heart's content. If you're anyone else, you get called on it.
Lots of people are incapable of thinking like the owner of a business
That doesn't mean you imply they're wrong for not having the proper perspective.
As an owner, having fewer admin grunts means more money to reinvest in higher-return activities (which as an employee you can help drive, if you're so inclined) and/or return to shareholders, who, after all, own the damn business and expect something from it.
When your wings melt from flying in rarified air, don't be surprised when people cheer.
But this hard-nosed perspective, for some reason, strikes people as cruel, or you're viewed as the villain or whatever.
The problem is that they're right.
It's just how the world works and you have to adapt accordingly, even if it's annoying and extra work at times.
So you support the fraud and abuse that devalues citizenship of a First World country? You are the problem and deserve anything coming to you that stops it.
Clearly if the visa program did not exist companies would be forced to hire the maybe less qualified US workers
That is the only valid goal, since the citizen would more likely be qualified for a given role than his non-citizen equivalent. If we're going to have "less qualified" people in there anyway, why not have them be our own?
The problem is that people in the US tend to be much more complacent about living up to that greatness than highly motivated people in other countries.
In general, we don't believe in being made desperate. Lack of desperation is not to be mistaken as "complacency". The US standard of living truly is not negotiable.
There are jobs out there. A lot of them.
For the ones that are real and hire citizens, employers are getting way too picky.
Training
The only training done these days is for non-citizen entities. Anyone else is required to satisfy the entitlement mentality of an employer's unrealistic qualifications.
Having been involved in hiring in the Ohio area, the average is around 70K->85K
That's not considering the near-impossibility of landing something entry-level despite having a reasonably good background.
If you're lucky enough to be without a security clearance, SW Ohio is dead for anything not already being moved Somewhere Else.
Get rid of the program and its enabling acts. Hard, but that's what has to happen. It, along with every single other program of its class, solely exists for fraud and abuse - and that anything else is a convenient side effect. Whether it is the US, Australia, Germany, the UK, or any other country free enough to need a supply of perpetually desperate labor, the purpose remains unchanged.
Naturally, this might be an issue with the pro-hellhole, anti-citizen part of /. that justifies it as "competitiveness". These people are largely outside the US and have no business in doing anything other than learning that it will happen to them.
Unless they readjust pay to offset the reduced hours, it's still a wash.
Then again, this is Amazon, where backstabbing is encouraged.
Not only do you get people that are worse off, it tends to overcorrect to remove non-minorities.
Then you wonder why your bigoted policy ends up with lots of incompetent diversity candidates.
There's no immigration in illegal alien.
Now we get to hear a slant that's not only left-wing, but also pro-illegal to boot.
People don't just die naturally or accidentally for having too much knowledge about their employer. Never mind that the reflexive excuses seem to come out when people dare question what happened.
By all account of her standards, she was prejudiced against Milo for his background.
The only reason they ever bothered is that some people of means were hurt by the lack of it. They don't care about ordinary people or what happens to them.
Thanks to Ailes' departure, Fox has gone quite far in the MSM direction.
How about you explain why harassers have been given protection on Twitter when they're of the correct political bent?