Slashdot Mirror


Apple Launches the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus; Feature Water-Resistance, Lack Headphone Jack (www.bgr.in)

Apple on Wednesday unveiled its new flagship smartphones: the iPhone 7, and the iPhone 7 Plus. Both the iPhones look similar to the last year's iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus, but offer a range of new features. Chief among those features are water and dust resistance, stereo speakers, improved cameras (the iPhone 7 Plus has a pair of 12MP cameras that are able to take SLR-quality images. It offers bokeh capability). And yes, the new iPhones indeed lack the headphone jack. "it's the best iPhone we have ever created," Apple CEO Tim Cook said. The home button is getting taptic feedback, similar to that of the MacBook.

So why is Apple removing the headphone jack? Apple's SVP Phil Schiller said, "courage."The company also announced AirPods wireless earphones. A pair of these will be priced at $169. The iPhones will go on sales starting September 16 in several regions including the United States In places like India, however, it will be available starting October 7.

551 comments

  1. DRM ahoy :( by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's hoping the rest of the market doesn't make like apple-obsessed sheep for once and make the 3.5mm headphone jack obsolete.

    1. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, I'm not likely to buy an iPhone (or iPod Touch), and I do like the idea of being able to use inexpensive third-party ear-buds. However, the idea of making the iPhone water- and dust-resistant seems like an interesting concept. I remember several seeing several earlier-model iPhones recovered from the water under a moderately-popular fishing pier. This feature, along with the more frequent security updates and longer update life of the iPhones might almost lead me to overcome the extra expense involved with the Apple line.

    2. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF is "SLR-quality" supposed to mean? (Question being asked by someone who knows what SLR is).

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    3. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's hoping the rest of the market doesn't make like apple-obsessed sheep for once and make the 3.5mm headphone jack obsolete.

      Remarkable. You're embracing a 100 year old technology that is single-purpose. Slahsdot now caters to Luddites.

    4. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are just trying to avoid the recent liability IP lawyers have created for "facilitating" piracy.

    5. Re:DRM ahoy :( by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      However, the idea of making the iPhone water- and dust-resistant seems like an interesting concept.

      Each iPhone has water-sensitive stripes to indicate water damage. But these are stripes are so sensitive that they change color if someone across the street spits into the gutter. Hence, the need for water-resistance.

    6. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are all the males in the Apple advertising black and all the females white? Every single male in the marketing videos have been black and all of the females have been white.

    7. Re:DRM ahoy :( by DaHat · · Score: 2

      Single purpose? Single intended purpose maybe, yet we've seen it also be usable for everything from credit card readers, IR blasters to 'ghost' detectors... and that aside from the eventual support for volume & track control.

    8. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Wowsers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's meaningless marketing. How does anyone think they will ever get the same kind of photograph a 35mm sensor does, as a pin head sensor on a mobile phone has?

      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
    9. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I think that it's more likely that they are trying to create a more appealing design. IMO most people (almost everyone except gadget freaks and old, change-resistant geezers) would prefer fewer connectors and greater resistance to environmental hazards.

    10. Re:DRM ahoy :( by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      and this happens somehow with the lightning-to-phono adapter that ships with every single one... how?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because "white male" is the new nigger.

      Trump 2016.

    12. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Wowsers · · Score: 0

      Luddites? Yeah, so more wireless crap that needs charging, and the phone didn't get a bigger battery, just make it thinner so even more recharges. Progress?

      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
    13. Re:DRM ahoy :( by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Better than catering to ass-holes that don't understand technology.

    14. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They get extra battery life. 2 hours more than the 6S on avg so that headphone is valuable space. Watch the event.

    15. Re:DRM ahoy :( by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Informative

      WTF is "SLR-quality" supposed to mean? (Question being asked by someone who knows what SLR is).

      The actual claim by Apple is that it provides "DSLR-like depth" by adding a "bokeh effect" feature. This is achieved through using a two camera system built-into the phone. There is no claim of SLR Quality. The Slashdot article summary is incorrect in this regard...

    16. Re:DRM ahoy :( by mindwhip · · Score: 3, Informative

      you realise that apple are the sheep with the water resist idea and there are already a number of android phones out there already with water resist? and the others managed to give water resist and keep the headphone jack? and that my 3 year old android phone is just as usable as it was when new?

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    17. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other than the fact that Apple includes an adapter in the box, everything you say is correct.

    18. Re:DRM ahoy :( by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If only there were waterproof phones on the market that had a 3.5mm jack... Oh wait!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    19. Re:DRM ahoy :( by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      As water-resistant as that Galaxy S7 was supposed to be?

    20. Re:DRM ahoy :( by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      This feature, along with the more frequent security updates and longer update life of the iPhones might almost lead me to overcome the extra expense involved with the Apple line.

      If you can't even afford a Slashdot account, how you gonna afford an iPhone 7?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you having trouble counting? This means fewer connectors on the phone itself.

    22. Re:DRM ahoy :( by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      The new iPhone having a 12 MP camera is a significant upgrade over the prior 8 MP camera.

      An entry level DSLR cameras would likely be a 12MP camera. Of course, they come up to 24 MP (last time I checked them, and perhaps beyond), but 12MP is realistically more than anyone needs unless you plan to make very large prints.

      DSLR is not "meaningless marketing", as someone above has said. Apple is saying the resolution is similar to what is offered by DSLR cameras, which is true for what today is an entry level DSLR camera.

    23. Re:DRM ahoy :( by al0ha · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 7 comes packaged with Lightning to 3.5 mm Headphone Jack Adapter

      !whining now please

      --
      Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    24. Re: DRM ahoy :( by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Informative

      That that is an absolute lie, total BS. A bulky 3.5mm jack is 0.5cc. Assuming the previous life of their 1715mA/3.7V battery was 14 hours, they are now adding another 245mA/3.7V worth of battery to it, to get those 2 additional hours. That translates to an energy density of around 6.4 MJ/L, about three times what the best LiPo batteries can give. Not a chance.

      If it lasts longer, it's not from a bigger battery, it's from more efficient components elsewhere. They're feeding you a line and you're swallowing it.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    25. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping the rest of the market doesn't make like apple-obsessed sheep for once and make the 3.5mm headphone jack obsolete.

      Remarkable. You're embracing a 100 year old technology that is single-purpose. Slahsdot now caters to Luddites.

      Yes, much better to replace it with one that is single-device.

    26. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! And bring back my floppy drive, dammit!

    27. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no its more apple double talk. they know full well this will be miss-interpreted by the media and the apple faithful as; the new iphone is just as good as a DSLR, tim cook said so.

    28. Re:DRM ahoy :( by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      IIRC they are also default white, so you can just bleach them back to a normal state before sending a phone in.

    29. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Khyber · · Score: 0

      " You're embracing a 100 year old technology that is single-purpose"

      No, we're embracing a reliable standard that works across a huge variety of technologies.

      That TS/TRS/TRRS plug/jack has worked for way more than headphones. Guitars, older phone switchboards, speaker connections, microphone connections, credit card readers (Etsy one plugs into my headphone jack) LED lighting, antenna, low-voltage power delivery, and much, much more.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    30. Re:DRM ahoy :( by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "DSLR" is marketing. Regardless of the number of pixels (oh, look, shiny!), without the light collection abilities of the large glass which can be put on a DSLR, and the photon collection abilities which come with the larger pixel sensors which DSLRs have, a phone will never come close.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    31. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Khyber · · Score: 0

      That you'd trust that thin flimsy piece of shit connector with practically nil traces makes me wonder what sort of nerd/geek you are.

      Not one that's studied any basic engineering, that's for sure.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    32. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Miamicanes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can definitely make a tiny sensor array with higher technical resolution than traditional ISO 400 print film grain... maybe even ISO 100. The catch is, you'll have to light up the scene to retina-searing brightness levels like a color movie set from the 1930s, because your effective f-stop will be insanely high and/or your dynamic range will be unacceptably low & have too much random noise.

      Big lenses and/or large-format film/sensors allow you to capture more photons and take pictures with less light.

    33. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know it's a flimsy piece of shit... how?

      Can we stop with the chicken little routine until one exists somewhere outside the factory, R&D, and QA?

    34. Re:DRM ahoy :( by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I have a Galaxy S5(!) that is water-resistant. Here's Apple playing catch-up again while all their fanbois act like it's some great new revelation from the ghost of Jobs.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    35. Re:DRM ahoy :( by hyperar · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping the rest of the market doesn't make like apple-obsessed sheep for once and make the 3.5mm headphone jack obsolete.

      Motorola dropped the headphone jack first, so it looks it's on the way out... or not, who knows?

    36. Re:DRM ahoy :( by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      with practically nil traces ...Not one that's studied any basic engineering, that's for sure.

      Ask me how I can tell you haven't studied engineering for about 20 years or so... or know what digital technology means.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    37. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the idiot, idiot. Yeah, take THAT!

    38. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! And bring back my floppy drive, dammit!

      The floppy drive never went away, it just moved to external USB.

    39. Re:DRM ahoy :( by AndyMoney · · Score: 2

      Megapixels has nothing to due with having "DSLR-like quality". 8 years ago, I paid big money for a Nikon D80 DSLR that had 4 megapixels LESS than the digital camera I had at the time, and the Nikon blew it out of the water.

    40. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I admit that I haven't seen pictures of the connector or of what it plugs into, I'd be more concerned about accidentally damaging the lightning connector on the phone than the 'flimsy piece of shit connector'. It would be much less expensive to replace the dongle than to fix the phone, if it comes to that.

    41. Re: DRM ahoy :( by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      But they reinvented the colours white and black!

    42. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Megapixels are pretty meaningless nowadays. What makes a bigger difference is the lens and the sensor. All other things being equal (like skill of the photographer), you'll take better photos with an 8MP camera with a good lens and sensor than with a 24MP camera with a horrible lens and sensor. Unfortunately, MP is a nice number to toss out for people to ooh and aah over.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    43. Re: DRM ahoy :( by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      Well? Where are you, Apple proxies who are Slashdot "community members"? No comment? This guy sure sounds like he knows what he's talking about. I think I may give up iPhone permanently based on this. I'm not kidding. Bet I'm not alone. If you want to keep your hipster base, Apple, the stuff you say is good has to be good in _some_ way. This looks like a shit idea done for shit reasons in service of some shitty DRM master plan that's certain to drive away all quality loving snobs, and the big fat icing on the cake is you're lying about why. If you don't keep the customers who love quality, your whole fashion-based marketing scheme will fall apart. You're not going to make it fashionable to give up your headphones. You're just not. You tried making the white plastic earbuds fashionable...sort of flew for a few years of dancing shadow silhouette commercials, but the kids I see now are not wearing them. That failed. You tried buying a headphone company; its image started to tarnish immediately after you bought it. Now you're going to try to make me part with my Grados. You have ZERO chance of this. Either you own the analog headphone in the device, or you will be out of the music game. The conversations people are about to overhear between nerds at work, at school....those conversations are NOT going to get you new customers.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    44. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Chris453 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tested my S7's water-resistant capabilities many times. Underwater videos were pretty cool. The only problem I had was it's charging sensor was pretty sensitive and wouldn't let you charge when damp. Wireless charging worked just fine though :)

    45. Re:DRM ahoy :( by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      "DSLR" is marketing. Regardless of the number of pixels (oh, look, shiny!), without the light collection abilities of the large glass which can be put on a DSLR, and the photon collection abilities which come with the larger pixel sensors which DSLRs have, a phone will never come close.

      Yep....the old saying still rings true today: "Put most of your money into good glass"...

      Hmm...wonder when the iPhone will have an EOS mount adapter...?

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    46. Re:DRM ahoy :( by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      That TS/TRS/TRRS plug/jack has worked for way more than headphones. Guitars, older phone switchboards, speaker connections, microphone connections, credit card readers (Etsy one plugs into my headphone jack) LED lighting, antenna, low-voltage power delivery, and much, much more.

      Yep, I repurposed my old iPhone 3Gs into a mic system for my videos....I have it hooked to a Rode SmartLAV microphone and use that to mic up someone on video. I have that for one mic, and then a RODE Wirless mic to be used most of the time that plugs into my 5D3 camera for video...but if I have a guest on my show, I can use the smartLAV mic for them.

      Lots of good uses for that jack...always nice to have a hardware backup for when wireless goes wrong.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:DRM ahoy :( by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      "DSLR" is marketing.

      You do know the DSLR actually means a type of camera and how it is constructed, right? Just like fuel-injected means a type of gasoline engine and notes how combustion in it is different than a carburetor style engine.

      DSLR is simply the digital upgrade to a SLR camera that previously was analog or film version where a digital sensor captures the image and stores it on a card as opposed to SLRs which exposed film directly to the image.

      Regardless of the number of pixels (oh, look, shiny!), without the light collection abilities of the large glass which can be put on a DSLR, and the photon collection abilities which come with the larger pixel sensors which DSLRs have, a phone will never come close.

      There are a number of factors which constitutes a decent camera from an inferior one. First of all the image sensor is much better on a DSLR. Only top end DSLRs use full frame sensors though. It is not just about the number of pixels. Second, the image processing is much better than a smartphone. Your cheap DSLR will take much better photos than a smartphone especially in the right hands. However, smartphones are to the point where they can take decent photos so this negates the need to carry both for the average consumer who doesn't need full frame, wide color photos to Instagram their food.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    48. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why they phrase it as such. They didn't have to include "DSLR", but to the uninformed this is all they'll get.

      I'm betting that 75% of the people will interpret this as "DSLR quality" like you have and not bokeh or background blur (i.e. what they actually said: DSLR-like blurring).

      The quality on *ANY* phone (even with quad cameras) will never reach the quality of DSLR until image tech gets 100 times better than it is today... and possibly bend physics a bit.

    49. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah anyone who understands photography knows the bigger lens takes in more light. Sure you can make the digital pick up a bit more sensitive. But optics are still important. It's why you see all those clip on lenses for just that reason.

    50. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My old point and shoot is 12 MP. It cost something like $99. It doesn't market itself as "DSLR-like" in any way because it's a point and shoot. It's optics don't allow for "DSLR-like" images, and it's got a hell of a lot better optics then an iphone. What makes DSLR DSLR isn't the number of pixels.

    51. Re:DRM ahoy :( by darkain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've done under water photography countless times with my Galaxy S5 a couple years back. Yeah, the "water-resistant" feature is the real-deal, and the phone is still working great today.

    52. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You android sheep will bend over. Copying Apple for so long you don't know what to do anymore.

    53. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. The lightning connector is quite strong, strong enough to cantilever the entire phone at an angle in the dock. http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MNN62/iphone-lightning-dock-black

    54. Re:DRM ahoy :( by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It means it's at least as good as the early prototype digital cameras from the 80s which were nothing more than a Kodak sensor in a Nikon SLR body.

      But then the Gameboy Camera was just as good too.

    55. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but think of the water!!! The Water!!!! :(((((((((((

    56. Re:DRM ahoy :( by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      because your effective f-stop will be insanely high

      Actually you have that quite backwards. With a tiny sensor the effective f/stop becomes incredibly low even with tiny sensors as ultimately the math depends on the field of view and the sensor area. Hence mobile phones and point and shoot often have lenses with effective apertures of f/1.3 Certainly the largest you're likely to find is f/2-2.8ish.

      The problem is more on the sensor side and frankly we've made so many leaps and strides in the past 20 years that we have well and truly left traditional ISO400 film in the dust when it comes to image quality and resolution on a mobile phone. We left it in the dust in DSLRs over 10 years ago.

    57. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of other companies have water-resistant phones with 3.5mm jacks.

      And the phone isn't even thinner, as people suggested it would be.

      So... it's a flagrant lock-in attempt, pure and simple. They don't even pretend anymore.

    58. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you reading and commenting on this article if you feel so strongly about this phone? Nothing better to do with your time?

    59. Re:DRM ahoy :( by msauve · · Score: 0

      "You do know the DSLR actually means..."

      Oh, I understand it much better than you understand context.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    60. Re:DRM ahoy :( by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You know I cannot read your mind right? What you type is what you type.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    61. Re:DRM ahoy :( by msauve · · Score: 0

      No mind reading required. Only paying attention to the thread.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    62. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Even more so, actually. While the S7 had a design flaw, there have been several models spanning the last few years that have enjoyed great success. Maybe Apple should have coordinated with some of them on how to make it work sooner or without removing key features.

    63. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      No, it's NOT "single-purpose". It might be MARKETED as "a headphone jack", but it's REALLY 3 raw GPIO lines plus a ground (or at least, two waveform outputs and one waveform input) constrained to specific sample rates).

      Headphone jacks are a great way to hack up cheap circuits to do simple, analog(-ish) things, like sense the state of a switch or sample a resistive analog value (generate power from the mic port, then use the resistive sensor with a simple oscillation circuit to generate something you can analyze via FFT). Yeah, you can ultimately achieve most of this using the USB port (Android ADK, IOIO, etc)... but a bare headphone plug and a soldering iron is a hell of a lot cheaper AND smaller than the electronics you'd otherwise need to do even the most trivial i/o over USB. The ADK in particular is HUGE (quite possibly bigger than the phone itself), and even IOIO is the size of a USB flash drive.

      Want to power something using the phone? Output a high-frequency sine wave at max volume. Feed it into a transformer, then regulate its output if necessary. Assuming you can't just drive it with a looping waveform of 0x7FFF at max volume to generate enough DC.

      Want a serial port? OK... DB9 port, level-shifter IC, and a headphone plug. Some Samsung (and possibly HTC) Android phones actually shipped with kernel-level support for such hardware (I know the Galaxy S family did, and I'm pretty sure the Galaxy S2 family did, but I think Samsung quit building it into the stock kernel starting with the S3).

      And let's not forget cool, useful things like thirdparty IR blasters and credit card readers that plug into the headphone jack.

      An Android phone might begin its life as a phone and only get used as such for a year or two, but having useful i/o greatly increases the opportunities to repurpose old Android devices and give them a second life as security webcams, pet door monitors, touchscreen remote controls, etc. So yeah, the current villain might be Apple, but it's imperative that Android owners fight Apple's abandonment as hard as the iPhone community, and to come down HARD condemning any Android phone that does the same thing to keep other companies from blindly following Apple and eliminating headphone jacks on their top-shelf ANDROID devices, too.

    64. Re:DRM ahoy :( by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Horseshit. Apple wants it both ways. They send out the press leaks with "SLR-quality" or "DSLR-quality" and then try to walk it back. Please Google, "Apple iPhone 7 SLR quality" and see how many different tech media outlets use the exact same phraseology of "SLR-quality". That doesn't happen accidentally or because every single tech news outlet misunderstood Apple. It happens because that's how the Apple press leaks are worded. All those tweets from this afternoon about the iPhone 7 with "SLR-quality" in them didn't happen because all those people spontaneously and simultaneously hallucinated the phrase.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    65. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you're european.. I can smell your faintly fruity, rotted stench of 'eurogance'...

    66. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the current righteousness of over-the-top HDR post will make up for that.

    67. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they make CPUs that ceiling at 500MHz?

    68. Re:DRM ahoy :( by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      My $99 Samsung Rugby Pro is water resistant and it has a 3.5mm jack. It meets the IP67 water resistance spec (can be submerged in 1 meter of water for up to 30 minutes).

      So that whole "make it waterproof" thing is bullshit. They just want to sell people earbuds for $169 a pop.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    69. Re:DRM ahoy :( by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's almost as if web sites copy from each other. Not like slashd... oh, wait a minute.

    70. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple never even said they got rid of the 1/8" jack because of battery or thinness. Every feature on a board is competing for socket space. Apple wanted a sealed phone, which meant they needed to change the home button to be haptic, which meant they needed socket space for a haptics engine, and they also wanted space for a camera stabilizer, and space for a wireless engine to process telemetry from their headphones, and maybe they put in an accelerator for their unreleased lossless audio codec, and they added two low power cores to A10, so maybe they added some more devices for them to control, etc etc. The reality is, the phone jack just couldn't compete for socket space, and I would imagine more and more manufacturers will switch to type C now, especially since Intel recently released a digital accessory spec.

      People should be angry that apple is forcing vendor lock in with their bullshit plug format, not that the phone jack is going away.

    71. Re:DRM ahoy :( by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      The f-stop is low, but the *effective* f-stop for depth-of-field purposes (computed by multiplying the f-stop times the crop factor) is huge. This is why focusing almost doesn't matter, because essentially the whole universe beyond a sphere that starts three or four inches out from the lens is always roughly in focus.

      These devices with multiple cameras try to fake depth of field by using multiple angles to create a depth map and then applying some sort of blur, hence the marketing jargon "DSLR-quality". All it really means is that there's at least a small amount of subject isolation under certain circumstances.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    72. Re:DRM ahoy :( by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping the rest of the market doesn't make like apple-obsessed sheep for once and make the 3.5mm headphone jack obsolete.

      Yep. The 3.5mm jack....it just works and it also doesn't need a goddamn battery. It provides total, 100% compatibility with hundreds of thousands of different devices.

      But Apple wants to sell $169 earbuds to every sucker on the planet, so it has to die. That's what this is about, not sound quality or "waterproofing".

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    73. Re:DRM ahoy :( by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The GP is right. The lightning connector is amazingly flaky and unreliable in my experience even when using it exclusively for charging, much less for audio. I can't imagine the amount of continuous frustration that Lightning-attached headphones would cause. The contact points are an order of magnitude too small to be robust against even the smallest amount of physical motion. I mean, it is more reliable than micro-USB, but that's like saying that a go-kart is safer in a rear-end collision than a Pinto; if the bar is low enough, you're sure to exceed it....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    74. Re: DRM ahoy :( by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      That that is an absolute lie, total BS. A bulky 3.5mm jack [digikey.com] is 0.5cc. Assuming the previous life of their 1715mA/3.7V battery was 14 hours, they are now adding another 245mA/3.7V worth of battery to it, to get those 2 additional hours. That translates to an energy density of around 6.4 MJ/L, about three times what the best LiPo batteries can give. Not a chance.

      I did the math based on a more accurate estimation of Apple's amazingly tiny 3.5mm jack, and IIRC, I came up with 12 minutes. Most of the battery life improvements likely come from a more efficient CPU with lower-power idle states (which also likely makes it a bit of a myth if you're actually using the device in a non-negligible way).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    75. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      My S7 went puddle diving a few weeks back. Working fine. I bet that if my iphone 6 went into that puddle it wouldn't come out so great.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    76. Re:DRM ahoy :( by youngone · · Score: 1
      I have a Canon EOS 550d, marketed as the Rebel 2 (?) I think in the US 5 or so years ago when it was new. It has an 18.4 mega pixel sensor.

      The Canon 5d mark IV has a 50 mega pixel full frame (35 mm film equivalent), although that is considered a pro level camera.

      Having said that, I have seen at the camera club I attend an image taken on an iPhone 4 win the top prize for the night. Taken by a very skilled photographer though.

    77. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Digital technology means the connector is thicker and more robust? How??

    78. Re:DRM ahoy :( by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      You're probably one of those hipsters that complain that the wheel is thousands of years old.

      If you had a clue about hardware / software the first rule is:

      "Don't fix what isn't broken"

      There is a reason we have standards -- so they can be ubiquitous. Change for the sake of change is nothing more then greed.

    79. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      And Samsung dropped the MicroSD slot on their flagship phone a generation ago. It's back on this year's phone.

      There is always hope when a manufacturer does something stupid that the marketplace will bitchslap them.

      In the case of Apple, that really isn't a hope, as they view being bitchslapped by the majority market as an honor.

    80. Re: DRM ahoy :( by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That's about in line with what I'd expect. Essentially zero improvement - especially when you consider you now have to have a Bluetooth radio running all the time, pulling another 50-80 mW constantly. That will eat up the 12 minutes and more...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    81. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My $99 Pebble Steel is waterproof to 50 feet. I can swim with it on, which is good because there are fitness apps involving swimming for it.

    82. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The 3.5mm jack isn't single-purpose, though. There is a microphone input on it as well, and that input is actually used for plug-in magnetic stripe readers. You can plug a stripe reader into your phone and with the right app turn it instantly into a point-of-sale terminal. My sister bought an iPad for her shop specifically for that purpose.

      There are other gadgets that can be plugged in that make use of the mic input as well.

    83. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone 7 comes packaged with Lightning to 3.5 mm Headphone Jack Adapter

      So now I have to have a connector always hanging out of my phone just so I can plug in speakers or headphones, why not just keep it built into the phone? I think Apple products are great (I have their laptops and phones) but I despise their obsession with touting every trivial thing they do "amazing", they're like a 5-year-old at a carnival and the audience at these things are the first-time parents who wonderously applaud every little thing the kid does. Add the mind-numbingly pretentious act to label themselves "courageous" for removing a headphone jack, for fuck sake that is lame.

    84. Re:DRM ahoy :( by lucm · · Score: 2

      Apple bends physics on a regular basis by selling new phones that are identical to their previous ones but are at the same time "better".

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    85. Re:DRM ahoy :( by lucm · · Score: 2

      No, we're embracing a reliable standard that works across a huge variety of technologies.

      Are you talking about systemd?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    86. Re:DRM ahoy :( by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      [...] Hence mobile phones and point and shoot often have lenses with effective apertures of f/1.3 Certainly the largest you're likely to find is f/2-2.8ish.

      Actually, f/2 and f/2.8 are smaller apertures than f/1.3.

    87. Re:DRM ahoy :( by harperska · · Score: 2

      They apparently accomplish a simulated bokeh effect through digital manipulation by somehow calculating a depth map to apply the blur. Therefore it is 'DSLR-like' by mimicking an effect that you would need a DSLR to accomplish ordinarily. We won't really know until it is released to know where the effect falls on the line between gimmick and useful tool.

    88. Re:DRM ahoy :( by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Well, probably not. But no-one is claiming that the iPhone 6 is water resistant, so I'm not sure what your point is.

    89. Re:DRM ahoy :( by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't remove the headphone jack because it allowed them to make the device waterproof. I mean, I don't understand why they removed it, but I don't think it was for that reason.

    90. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? The new Apple Watch is water proof too. We're talking about the new iPhone being water resistant; good to only 1 meter.

    91. Re:DRM ahoy :( by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      It's nit-picky, I know, but single purpose doesn't mean the same thing as single-use. Whatever you feel about the removal of the headphone jack, the fact remains that all of the non-audio-out uses of the jack were horrible hacks.

    92. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be using aftermarket cables; where the lightning connector is not one solid piece but rather two that snap together.

      Please look at http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MNN62/iphone-lightning-dock-black?fnode=42

      The weight of the phone is cantilevered by just the lightning port. That blade and socket are designed to be quite strong.

    93. Re:DRM ahoy :( by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I've found quite the opposite. Lightning leads, on the other hand, are uniformly terrible, and break at interface between the lightning plug and the lead all the time. But the physical connection between the lightning plug and socket has always been rock-solid for me. Quite a bit more so than the headphone jack, which is often a bit crackly, and even more often fails to work with the remote button functions (play/pause etc).

    94. Re:DRM ahoy :( by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Lenses don't "take" any light, sensors do. Perhaps "anyone who understands photography" should try to understand a little more.

      Larger sensors require more light, not less. The problem with small sensors is often an inability to reduce light sufficiently, not that they ever require "retina-searing brightness levels". Small sensors with high resolution require higher resolution optics and have poor dynamic range. They tend to struggle with noise as a result. That's not a function of an inability to light a scene, it's the result of small physical apertures and poor cell capacity.

      You, and the poster you responded to, have no idea what you are talking about.

    95. Re:DRM ahoy :( by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      You will also take a better picture with the camera you have than the one you don't. A phone with a crappy lens is better than the DSLR you left at home.

    96. Re: DRM ahoy :( by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      The extra battery life comes from the architecture of the A10 processor, not extra battery capacity. The A10 has two low power cores in addition to the main cores.

    97. Re:DRM ahoy :( by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Did iPhones ever have FM radio? Well, these new ones certainly don't as you need an analogue connection to the headphone wire to act as an antenna.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    98. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Khyber · · Score: 1

      But not strong enough to survive an accidental bend when put in the back pocket with headphones attached to it and then sitting like many will do.

      I know what the materials used in making the plug itself are. They're pretty shitty and not sturdy. They'd have been better off using ceramics on the plug. /mfw I design electronics

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    99. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you go mac you never go back.

    100. Re:DRM ahoy :( by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      f-number, whatever ;-)

    101. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping the rest of the market doesn't make like apple-obsessed sheep for once

      It's not 2007 anymore. Apple had some lead in innovation back then. For the last few year everything Apple have been doing is "me too" (ipad mini, phablet iphone, watch, pen, maps, music etc etc)

    102. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should understand physics a bit more?

      Large lens+ large sensor >> small lens+ small sensor (all with respect to captured photons properly).

      Any other claim is pure delusion.

    103. Re: DRM ahoy :( by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      You must be using aftermarket cables; where the lightning connector is not one solid piece but rather two that snap together.

      No, the dozen or so devices I've used are moderately flaky with Apple's cables, too. I mean, they're not horrible—they never fail when they're just sitting there—but when you tug on them at an angle (like headphone cables frequently do), they do lose contact pretty reliably.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    104. Re: DRM ahoy :( by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, I'm not talking about the cables breaking. I'm talking about the cables momentarily disconnecting. The only Lightning cable I've had break was an Apple cable that was so thin that the vacuum cleaner ate it. Now, I use third-party cables because they are thick enough and inflexible enough to not get sucked up. (Thin is almost never a virtue when it comes to cables.)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    105. Re:DRM ahoy :( by wh1pp3t · · Score: 1
      More like Licensing Ahoy.

      "This Audio Devices is Not Certified" messages will accompany.

    106. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Without disagreeing, these days you also need to put your money into a big sensor.

      Although mobile phone sensors are now exceedingly good, they just aren't getting as many photons hitting them as a cheap DSLR, let alone a full frame DSLR or medium format sensor.

      The fun is that the glass is struggling to keep up with full frame sensors now, although I don't have faith that phones will close the gap on that front.

    107. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Cederic · · Score: 1

      It starts to matter as you increase the size of the display. I have a five foot wide print on my wall, I have to stand over a metre away before the rendered camera resolution blurs into an analogue picture.

    108. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I find this a curious feature. "We're going to intentionally smear part of your image" ?

      Bokeh is an artefact of the lens and how it focuses, and can be intentionally used to great effect. Artificial bokeh feels wrong somehow.

    109. Re:DRM ahoy :( by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1

      No-one said it was a 35mm SLR. They could be comparing it to a 110 SLR - Pentax made a few.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    110. Re:DRM ahoy :( by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      If only there were a website where you could look up this kind of thing.

    111. Re:DRM ahoy :( by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      And what do you do if you want to charge the phone and listen to music at the same time?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    112. Re:DRM ahoy :( by poszi · · Score: 1

      You can definitely make a tiny sensor array with higher technical resolution than traditional ISO 400 print film grain... maybe even ISO 100. The catch is, you'll have to light up the scene to retina-searing brightness levels like a color movie set from the 1930s, because your effective f-stop will be insanely high

      No, you cannot match the resolution because the insanely high f-stop implies insanely high loss of resolution due to diffraction. At low f-stop, the optics determines the resolution and you can improve it by making the iris smaller but smaller iris results in the diffraction loss and there is an optimal f-stop with maximum resolution. Higher f-stop will not make it better.

      --

      Save the bandwidth. Don't use sigs!

    113. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 6 got dropped into the toilet. Works fine.

    114. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been struggling to find a low price way to do this, but their dock has the ability to charge while plugging in 3.5mm headphones. But nothing that splits Lightning.

      http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MNN62/iphone-lightning-dock-black?fnode=42

    115. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please try that same bend test with USB-C. That hollow little oval will not support your weight.

    116. Re:DRM ahoy :( by steve90 · · Score: 1

      The 7 plus will have two separate cameras, one with a wide angle and one with a a short telephoto lens. This addresses one side of the problem with iPhones as cameras for people photos - the wide angle lenses (I think 28 or 35mm equivalent) happens to be pretty unflattering. If I was shooting portraits with a DSLR I would want a focal length of at least 85mm and preferably a bit longer. The new Nikon 105mm F1.4 portrait lens looks perfect for this sort of shooting. However they are saying that even the telephoto lens will only be around 56mm equivalent, still too wide IMHO. The other problem with iPhones for people photos are that with tiny sensors you are stuck with a very large depth of field so you can't blur the background to create nice bokeh. They are apparently going to attempt this in software - I have no idea if this will look right or not. If I was a betting man I suspect it will look better than the current iPhone 6 photos but worse than a full frame DSLR photo taken with a telephoto lens and the aperture wide open. I am quite a keen photographer so this would definitely push me towards the 7 plus over the 7, even though I currently have a 6 because I didn't want something as large as a 6 plus.

    117. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because 40 year old technology should be embraced not replaced you dummy.

    118. Re:DRM ahoy :( by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Without disagreeing, these days you also need to put your money into a big sensor.

      I have a 5D3....eyeballing the 5D4 maybe in a year or two.

      But a quality crop sensor is nice too...and yes if you're talking cheap, cheap, cheap on sensor, yes you need to spend a bit more.

      Photography is not a cheap hobby or career....but you do have to choose where you spend your resources if your resources are limited. And a decent sensor as a given, I'd still say put more $$ into glass.

      LOL...I'm not afraid of mobile phone encroachment on the pro cameras any time soon, HOWEVER, if more consumers start thinking it is good enough, they may stop buying more prosumer models, and those prices will go up for those of us that really need and use them....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    119. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I went m43 for the portability, and the image quality is 2-4 years behind SLRs purely due to sensor size.

      The mobile phone encroachment is however much worse at that format, so prices are already ludicrous. Well over a grand for lenses that would be a third of that price in full frame.

    120. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is what I call bullshit on.

      The more area there is, the more photos can fall on it, the lesser the noise is. The larger the pixel's size, the better it is. So no, not even close to SLR quality at all.

    121. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't flush it?

    122. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a lie. It needs about 30 seconds of liquid on it to change colour.

    123. Re:DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except for those sound systems with a USB port?

    124. Re:DRM ahoy :( by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Correction: Megapixels are pretty meaningless above about 8MP.

      The difference between 2MP and 3MP is still huge and always will be.

    125. Re:DRM ahoy :( by torkus · · Score: 1

      You're going to have a hard time explaining bokah to people who primarily take selfies :)

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    126. Re:DRM ahoy :( by torkus · · Score: 1

      wah wah...didn't you read?

      There's 2 more hours of battery life! Who would need to worry about stupid things like CHARGING while listening to music?

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    127. Re:DRM ahoy :( by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      So now, the phone will go for almost a full day on a charge? Amazing!

      --
      Eat the rich.
    128. Re: DRM ahoy :( by chasm22 · · Score: 1

      Oh boy. I've already seen this phrase "hundred year old technology " used multiple times as a 'reason ' for Apple to remove the headphone jack.

      However, you go the extra mile and brand anyone who opposes the removal of the headphone jack as a Luddite.

      Even taking your obvious misinterpretation of what it meant to be a Luddite (hint-not opposing new technology but virulently opposing automation that led to job loss), one would have to at least say that removing something because it's old technology doesn't make any sense unless you have something better to replace it .

      Oh, I guess they do. Look at those beautiful air pods. Bet you can hardly wait to get some. Yup, with a design like that they'll be no mistaking what YOU'RE wearing. Bold. Courageous might even come to mind. Me, well I'll just say if you like the way the Apple watch looks then this will be a winner.

      Yes, this all points to Apple innovation. Water tight. Twin lenses. 32 gigs of memory. Stunning black model. No headphone jack. COURAGE. Don't forget that. Don't ever doubt that Apple has the courage to take more of your money.

    129. Re:DRM ahoy :( by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      These are your EXACT words.

      "DSLR" is marketing. Regardless of the number of pixels (oh, look, shiny!), without the light collection abilities of the large glass which can be put on a DSLR, and the photon collection abilities which come with the larger pixel sensors which DSLRs have, a phone will never come close.

      It's my fault that you didn't use your words correctly.?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    130. Re: DRM ahoy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just half year of living near equator.

  2. So i guess no more disabling local mic and speaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for privacy and using a jack.

    i think trusting something that isn't easily verifiably not communicating is a bit naive these days.

  3. Crap by fnj · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's crap. Pure crap.

  4. Timeliness by alvinrod · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People tend to criticize this site for being late with stories, but Apple announcements are one instance where Slashdot seems to trot them out before the paint even dries. They're still talking about features in the presentation right now and even the linked article mentions that there's still more to come. Why not wait for the dust to settle a little before rushing this story out?

    1. Re:Timeliness by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Why not wait for the dust to settle a little before rushing this story out?

      Because unlike our posts the summaries can be updated. Hell, most news websites do the same thing for running current events: get the story started then update it as more information is released.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Timeliness by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      That seems especially pointless for a site dedicated to the discussion of news. A lot of the posts are going to be speculative or outright wrong, which could be prevented simply by waiting another 30 minutes until the announcement is finished and all of the details (at least the ones that were part of the presentation) are out.

      It's also weird, because Slashdot doesn't seem to do this with any other type of story, at least not that I'm aware of as almost any other event or announcement eventually gets a post, but the Apple posts seem to come out mid-announcement.

    3. Re:Timeliness by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " A lot of the posts are going to be speculative or outright wrong, which could be prevented simply by waiting another 30 minutes until the announcement is finished and all of the details (at least the ones that were part of the presentation) are out. "

      And people will still post incorrect information, because they've likely NOT WATCHED THE PRESENTATION.

      Simple logic.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Timeliness by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      A lot of the posts are going to be speculative or outright wrong

      You mean there are some that are not? I am shocked, I tell you, shocked!

      I may even have to switch to Twitter to avoid any risk of sanity!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  5. please don't link to apples site by fredan · · Score: 1, Troll

    dear slashdot editors.

    please don't link to apples site about iphone 7.

    1. Re:please don't link to apples site by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      it has the cooties

  6. psy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you think I feel how you feel when I don't know what?

  7. but the dongle is free by known_coward_69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the most shocking announcement this afternoon. i really thought it would be $29.99

    1. Re:but the dongle is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first taste is free, but we know apple adapters eventually give up.

    2. Re:but the dongle is free by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      There is no eventually about it. They will need replaced every month or so. This is Apples attempt to add a side door subscription charge to allow their customers to use other manufacturers headphones.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    3. Re:but the dongle is free by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder if that's where they keep the fire, like Samsung's adapter.

    4. Re:but the dongle is free by Mike · · Score: 1

      It's free because it's worthless if you expect to charge your phone while using it, which for me is an absolute requirement.

    5. Re:but the dongle is free by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      And even more shocking, they are retailing for $9.

    6. Re:but the dongle is free by jandrese · · Score: 1

      They're planning to make it up with the insane $160 proprietary wireless earbuds.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:but the dongle is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no question that Apple will start charging for the dongle eventually. You've got about two years before they stop including it and you have to pay for it.

    8. Re:but the dongle is free by geek · · Score: 1

      They're planning to make it up with the insane $160 proprietary wireless earbuds.

      If by proprietary you mean Bluetooth 4.2 then sure......................

    9. Re:but the dongle is free by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      the most shocking announcement this afternoon. i really thought it would be $29.99

      No. It's free with every purchase of a phone. That's a big difference for such a very small dongle. It's also frustrating when you can't find it, and looks small enough for some iBaby to choke on.

      Yeah Apple must really have had "courage" to try and market this shit as something good.

    10. Re:but the dongle is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the most shocking announcement this afternoon. i really thought it would be $29.99

      The splitter adapter which allows you to charge and listen at the same time (wow - what a feature!) will likely cost that.

    11. Re:but the dongle is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the least shocking thing was the announced apple-esque price of the new wireless headphone pod thingies at $169

      for half the people who listen to music from their phone, the cost of the phone likely just went up.... a lot.... and *that* is the one true real reason why the headphone jack was removed.

    12. Re:but the dongle is free by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The first one is free. It always is.

      A lightening connector is not anywhere near as robust as a 3.5mm jack. The lead coming out of the jack can pivot and swivel 360 degrees and encounter no resistance. People carrying a phone in their pocket with a lightening cable connected are asking for trouble. Probably enough trouble that they'll give up and flash plastic at the Apple Store. $169 is nothing in today's economy, right?

    13. Re:but the dongle is free by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      But how much to replace it when it breaks?

      Sure, you get a "free" charger and lightning cable, but when you need a spare to keep at work or replace a broken/lost one, it's $30. Apple DRM will brick your cheaper third party one eventually.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:but the dongle is free by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      The lead coming out of the jack can pivot and swivel 360 degrees and encounter no resistance.

      The lightning port is more robust than a 3.5mm jack - those things fail pretty easily, and things like the remote control stop working. Also, the 3.5mm jack can rotate, but it's not going to unless you twist the lead enough to damage it. That said, the strain relief on all the lightning connectors I've ever used has been terrible, so the adaptor is fairly likely to break at the plug.

    15. Re:but the dongle is free by houghi · · Score: 1

      Is it free or included in the package? Is it free as in going into a store and ask for 50 of them and I get them, no questions asked? Because that would be free.
      Or is it limited to 1 per person? Because that is less free. Or do you have to own an iPhone 7, because then it is not free, but part of the service you paid for.
      I could understand the limited free as in 1 per person per week at most. Anything else and it's nor free.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    16. Re:but the dongle is free by msauve · · Score: 1

      Is BT 4.2 what allows simultaneous communications to 2 separate earbuds? All the BT references I can find refer only to multipoint capability, where BT can connect to two devices (like a headset and a phone), but only one can be in active use at a time. Or is this due to some proprietary extension to Bluetooth? Apple makes no mention of AirPods being compatible with any non-Apple product.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  8. No added value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing here that would make me upgrade my phone. Water resistance? Who cares. No headphone jack is a net-negative.

    1. Re:No added value by Wild_dog! · · Score: 2

      "Water resistance? Who cares."

      My boss dropped his machine in the water this past weekend.
      My wife left hers in a puddle when it fell out of the car unbeknownst to her.
      I have know several people who have accidentally knocked theirs in the toilet.

      Some people care even if you hope to never care.

    2. Re:No added value by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised it wasn't already water resistant. Quite a lot of phones are.

    3. Re:No added value by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I think maybe apple is lagging, but still the vast bulk of phones on the market are. Apple really doesn't tend to lead the market in most cases. I haven't found them to be trend setters as most innovation seems to be from the phone makers who are struggling for a foothold.
      Once people start wanting something in large enough numbers it seems to become available from Apple.

      Not really surprising there.

      Solid improvements over time, but nothing grand.

    4. Re:No added value by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Actually, for me that is probably the most valuable feature. Getting bigger, faster, etc. is expected. What concerns me are things like durability. I've had my iPod Touch for years now, and three times I was afraid I might have to be without it. First I dropped it in the woods, not sure how one would fix that problem though. Second time it fell out of my pocket and into a puddle, thankfully I got it out of the water quickly and I saw no permanent damage. The third time was when I dropped my iPod onto a hard concrete floor. Newer devices have tougher glass to deal with such abuses and had I got a new iPod recently I would not be dealing with a cracked screen right now. It still works but the cracks in the screen are annoying so I'm looking for a replacement.

      A piece of electronics designed to fit in a pocket with the durability to handle short drops onto hard floors and puddles of water are a selling point to me. If it also has something to help me find it again if lost in the woods then I will be much more likely to buy it over the competition.

      The loss of a headphone jack is a non-issue for me. Since the headphone jack on my iPod wore out months ago I've learned to do without. What I would have liked is a cheap replacement for the worn headphone jack but none exist. With this iPhone I know one is available. So, perhaps less than a non-issue but actually a plus.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  9. Bokeh! by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 0

    But it offers bokeh capability!

    What more would anybody want? You can get your bokeh right from the phone!

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Bokeh! by lucm · · Score: 1

      I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more bokeh

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  10. I've always wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bokeh capability

    1. Re:I've always wanted by PIBM · · Score: 2

      My 12 years old DSLR will still take better pictures than those new iphones, it just might not be that evident anymore.

    2. Re: I've always wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it for in your pocket? Seriously film has higher resolution than any digital sensor but are you arguing for a kove back to film too?

    3. Re:I've always wanted by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      Or relevant to how we use photos now. If you need large-scale printed media or high-quality video, you already know to not use a phone camera. For everything else, we are not suffering for phone-camera capability - it's just toys from this point onward.

    4. Re: I've always wanted by PIBM · · Score: 1

      35mm film 'high iso' (400-800) has more noise and approximately the same resolution as that old DSLR capturing 3k x 2k I was talking about. If you were using slower film with tripod (so that the image stabilizator didn`t improve the shot that much over the old one) you can definitely reach the level of my 4years old DSLR, but you had none of the advantages.

      I`ll see how it fares against a 50mm F1.4, or at wide angle level.. or even against my telephoto objectives. The thing is, when I want to take good picture, I get my gear out and set myself up for nice shots. If I just want to keep a souvenir then the samsung s6 does the job pretty well. I still have my film cameras, but last week I finally decided to throw to the garbage the films I had kept in the freezer for the last decade. I was sad to throw off the slides films though, those were the best :)

    5. Re:I've always wanted by kungfool · · Score: 0

      does your 12 yo dslr fit in your pocket ? do you always have it with you ? how long does it take to get the settings right and focus ? how long to switch from one setting to another ? and the only way your dslr is better resolution is if it's film, how long does it take to get you photos back ? how much does the film and the development cost ? i have 1200 photos on my camera, how many can you take on your dslr without carrying a suitcase full of film ? why do you still think it takes better photos ?

    6. Re: I've always wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course film has a higher resolution than a similarly sized digital sensor. But he's not arguing that his 12 year old DSLR will take medium format film quality pictures, which is essentially what the summary is claiming of the new phone.

    7. Re:I've always wanted by PIBM · · Score: 1

      D-SLR means Digital SLR. Yes, that`s as old as that. With image stabilization at the sensor level. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... . My current DSLR has 2 128GB SD card in it, and I can switch them around as I see fit with many other cards.

      Why do I think it takes better photos ? Well I compared my Samsung S6 & my friend iPhone 6 plus pictures to those I had been taking years ago and it still wasn't equivalent to those old pictures. I was saying that it's possible that the new one will reach this level now, but it's still only a toy and not a tool. I already have a few friends who confirmed they will be updating, I guess I`ll find out soon enough.

    8. Re:I've always wanted by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Also, focusing with a DSLR manually is still way faster than auto-focus on the phones. I mostly use aperture priority mode meaning that the exposure will auto-adjust. I use my thumbs wheels to adjust the aperture, iso, and sometime over/under exposing instantly. The settings needed for the 'current' picture targets are somewhat dialed in before and only minutes adjustments are needed. After taking tons of pictures with a telephoto you can dial in the focus toward your target very quickly too. But then, the autofocus on DSLR has improved quite a lot and does a great job in most situations, and I'm still on a 4 years old dslr. I might change again in 4 years, I'll see what's best at that point!

    9. Re:I've always wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah yeah yeah,.. who cares?

  11. Courage? To profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    So they take away the 3.5 jack, give us an easy-to-lose adapter, and want to sell us their proprietary wireless one-size-fits-none earphones. And they call it courage? Really?
    Oh, but they have licensed out the wireless tech for a whopping 3 alternative headsets. I suppose that is supposed to appease us.

  12. Because they don't care by crweb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yay, you can no longer listen to headphones at your desk and have your phone charging. Listen all day at the office, phone is dead for the walk home. GREAT Idea.

    1. Re:Because they don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy an iPad you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Because they don't care by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's the stupidest damn thing; should've at least been a splitter adapter.

    3. Re: Because they don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you need to purchase dongles for your dongles.

    4. Re:Because they don't care by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they've improved the battery such that you can listen all day at the office and the phone won't be dead for the walk home.

    5. Re:Because they don't care by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Get a lighning adapter that charges and has a headphone jack.

      http://www.tama.com.cn/en/mifs...

    6. Re:Because they don't care by PRMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the first year. And then your battery starts losing power and you can't replace it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    7. Re:Because they don't care by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah,

      Except that is a solved problem already.

      Complain that you need to spend a few extra bucks, but don't bitch that you can no longer do it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    8. Re:Because they don't care by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      What the hell - nice going Chrome, not actually copying when I hit the keyboard shortcut.

      Actual link I meant to post: http://www.apple.com/shop/prod...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    9. Re:Because they don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the stupidest damn thing; should've at least been a splitter adapter.

      It's coming... only $29.99

    10. Re:Because they don't care by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      So in order to regain the exact same capability the last generation iPhone had, you have to spend more money? Well, that's... more or less exactly what I'd expect from Apple.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    11. Re:Because they don't care by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Yay, you can no longer listen to headphones at your desk and have your phone charging. Listen all day at the office, phone is dead for the walk home. GREAT Idea.

      This is pretty much the best critique i've seen of this architecture.

      It doesn't affect me though. I am already using bluetooth headphones at my desk. Still, you do point out a valid shortcoming.

    12. Re:Because they don't care by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      As I said, that's a legitimate gripe. Having to buy an extra thing where one was not necessary before is stupid. But spreading FUD that it's not possible is disingenuous at best.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    13. Re:Because they don't care by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why not just load a revolver with one bullet, spin the barrel, point at your phone and pull the trigger?

      I mean non-standard Chinese adaptor without licensing from Apple into a flagship smartphone? I hope you bought the Applecare insurance.

    14. Re:Because they don't care by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Not allowed per the Apple Accessory Interface Specification (R25). A cable can only have one and only one connector on each end, splitters are not allowed. At least for 3rd party vendors that is...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    15. Re:Because they don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That gives you a line level output.

      It's close, but won't work for headphones without some amp.

    16. Re:Because they don't care by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Don't look at it so much as the need to spend more money but the opportunity to carry another large piece of plastic and another cable!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    17. Re:Because they don't care by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      "Why not just load a revolver with one bullet, spin the barrel, point at your phone and pull the trigger?"

      That is funny.
      Anyhow. They make one and other people will as well. There is a market for such things.

      I use non-apple licensed stuff every day in my phone.
      Lots of people I know do as well. Chargers, car chargers, USB lightning cables. Adapters of all sorts.
      Could there be some problems? .... I have yet to have a problem, but I do hear of some problems now and again.

      It is not nearly so melodramatic as Russian Roulette.

    18. Re:Because they don't care by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

      Yay, you can no longer listen to headphones at your desk and have your phone charging. Listen all day at the office, phone is dead for the walk home. GREAT Idea.

      The new phone has 40 hours of audio playback battery life.

      In a peculiar way, I'd imagine this move will *improve* battery longevity over time for those who use their phones this way. You're essentially forced to discharge it when you would otherwise be keeping it at 100%, which is not good for long-term battery health.

      We'll see I guess.

    19. Re:Because they don't care by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Get a lighning adapter that charges and has a headphone jack.

      Now all they have to do is be the first company to build that into an iPhone case.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Because they don't care by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I used a non-standard 30-pin connector with my old iPod Touch. It actually was a connector cable from a dollar store that was wired into a battery pack, to power the iPod Touch. I thought it was stupid so spliced the lead onto an old cellphone charger that produced a nice standard 5 volts. It charged the iPod Touch perfectly. For awhile.

      About a month later, an iOS update was pushed out. The next time I connected that cable/charger, I got a stern warning about an unauthorized charger.

    21. Re:Because they don't care by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's actually a fairly small piece of plastic, that a baby could choke on. It also won't be difficult to lose.

    22. Re:Because they don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my first thought after hearing of iphone 7. While it's true that the iphone 7 dongle doesn't charge and output audio at the same time, people seem to conclude that it is therefore not possible to charge the iphone 7 and listen to audio at the same time.

    23. Re:Because they don't care by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Well, you do need some kind of hub so you can power your iPhone whilst listening to headphones... Something that you used to be able to do on all previous generations of iPhones! And that you can do with jackless Android phones (since Android has no issues with Y cables - which are specifically verboten by Apple per their Accessory Interface Spec).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:Because they don't care by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I assume this does not apply for docks, no? I have an iPod dock I use to make up for its worn headphone jack. I can charge the iPod while listening to headphones. In reality though I'm much more likely to take advantage of the wireless streaming to listen through powered speakers or my stereo while charging.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    25. Re:Because they don't care by msauve · · Score: 1

      "I'd imagine this move will *improve* battery longevity over time for those who use their phones this way. You're essentially forced to discharge it when you would otherwise be keeping it at 100%, which is not good for long-term battery health."

      Welcome to the Future. We now have batteries based on lithium technology which do not benefit from deep discharge cycles like the NiCd ones from your century. In fact, Li-ion batteries provide 4-8 times the number of cycles when discharged 25% vs 100%. A Li-ion battery can sit on a well designed charger for long periods with little impact to service life.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    26. Re:Because they don't care by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Correct. But the dock cannot have a permanently attached cable. It must be a separate cable that connects the dock to your laptop. Unless it, itself, directly snaps into and mechanically attaches to the laptop.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    27. Re:Because they don't care by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Furthermore they didn't add fucking wireless charging (WHAT?) that would've solved this issue. It's ridiculous.

      If they were smart, the wireless mat would charge the phone and then you plug your airpod headphone things into their case, into the bottom of the phone and the *phone itself* will charge your headphones for the day.

    28. Re:Because they don't care by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Belkin makes something too.

      https://www.macobserver.com/ne...

    29. Re:Because they don't care by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1
  13. Looks like by clonehappy · · Score: 1

    I'll be sticking with my iPhone 6S for years to come. Remember kids, never update your iOS past the next major revision after it was released. This ensures a long life and usability. I will stop at 10.0 to ensure slowness and battery draining doesn't kill my hardware prematurely.

    1. Re:Looks like by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      My 5S is still going working well with strong Battery life and I am beta testing 10. Had the phone for 3 years now and for the most part Battery hasn't been even a slight problem except when I accidentally leave the phone on and active and forget about it.

      Otherwise not really a hitch with it. I expect another couple of years will be fine as well.
      Still have a 3GS that works fine as well. At least for me, hardware has never been the problem. Accidents have been... but then screen replacements and connector replacements are not terribly hard to do up to this point.

      But everyone's mileage may vary.

    2. Re:Looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lumia 950XL is a really nice phone, Windows 10 Mobile is great and Groove and Music Pass and surprisingly excellent and complete. I use it alongside my iPhone 6 and find I reach for it when I can and the iPhone when I must (missing app).

    3. Re:Looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still using my 3GS.
      The battery still lasts 2-3 days without needing to be charged, and since I don't install a lot of apps, it's doing a bang-up job. Still has the original unblemished screen it shipped with too. I'll use this thing until it dies, then try and buy another 3GS off of ebay or something for $20.
      Apple can keep their $170 earphones. Anyone who actually buys those is an idiot, that really is lunacy at its finest.

      The only thing I've lost is the ability to use snapchat, but realistically, if I wanna see boobs I can just navigate to google...

  14. So much bokeh... by bazorg · · Score: 1

    OK 2017 will be the year of iPhone photos with bokeh effect. In all photos in all circumstances in all social media :)

    1. Re:So much bokeh... by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please. My social media feeds have been filled with out of focus, blurry photos for just as long as social media has been around.

    2. Re:So much bokeh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean social networks.

  15. Obligatory by paiute · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's wireless. Less space than Azure. Lame.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Obligatory by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And just like with that line I look forward to looking back on these comments for the next 15 years.

  16. IP67 by aglider · · Score: 1

    Until sunk. Then IP00.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  17. Goodbye Nexus 6P by dstyle5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "it's the best iPhone we have ever created," Apple CEO Tim Cook said.

    Amazing, I think I will now purchase an Apple iPhone 7 device due to this declaration by none other than the CEO of Apple. I was content with my Nexus 6P, but that has all changed now. Thanks slashdot for letting me know about this statement in particular, time for the trip behind the woodshed 6P.

    1. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      It's the best iPhone in the world! :)

    2. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by DaHat · · Score: 1

      How is this any different from any other Apple event where they announce the new device to be the fastest, thinnest, stylish, etc they've ever built?

    3. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jobs trained the man well.

    4. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Right? I mean, the iPhone 6s Plus is a fine device (not my cup of tea, but my wife sure seems to like hers), why would Cook denigrate it by saying this new dreck is better?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    5. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      That's just like being the "Best piece of shit in the world!"

    6. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Not really any different.
      Every generation is the fastest.
      I would think Tim Cook would weary of that line.

    7. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by zlives · · Score: 2

      because he is marketing to a previous apple buyer i.e. your wife
      look shiny!! i think is what he meant in plainspeak

    8. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Except that she's on my side re: the iPhone 7. Most iPhone users I know are, along with every single Android user I know. Mind you, I don't know all of them, but if my rather large (global and multi-industry, not just Silicon Valley tech people) circle is at all representative of the wider population, and I believe it is, the iPhone 7 isn't going to see the sales numbers previous models have seen; and if they don't backpedal a bit, the 7s won't either.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    9. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Just like every version of Windows has been "The best version of Windows yet!" since Windows 95. You know it's true, because every single installer has told you so after you've [allegedly] already purchased it.

      I like to call it "customer purchase reassurance".

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's different as it was Cook saying it - hasn't it traditionally been Ive's job to say that line in his softest possible tone?

      And who says they don't innovate in Cupertino anymore? :)

    11. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by zlives · · Score: 1

      clearly the "Look Shiny (tm)" marketing approach had worked for apple devices for a long time and it may take a version or two's failure to require a newer strategy.

      the truth is the devices have reached a functional/feature parity and now we are just tweaking numbering schemes.
      after 10 years the product has lost some luster the line between devices is blurred even within their ecosystem.
      Heck from a security stand point its probably the better product out there now that BB has stabbed itself one too many times even for me. but that is a normal progression of vendors and products. can't wait for the next new thing (look shiny)

    12. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I was content with my Nexus 6P, but that has all changed now.

      Easy there. It's only the best iPhone. The fact that he didn't have the balls to say the best phone in the world is saying something considering his arrogance.

    13. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is illustrative of your complete lack of perspective.

      Tim was saying that his company thinks this product is the best version of this product they ever made. There's nothing else nothing -- certainly nothing related to android. Normal human beings see this for what it is, a simple statement that they trot out as part of PR, and understandable. There's nothing there for you.

      No one cares what you think, feel, say, or do. Not Tim Cook, not anyone.

    14. Re:Goodbye Nexus 6P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is!
      "Here's the new Apple iPhone 7, not a good as the iPhone 6 - I don't know why we're bothering to produce it, but buy it anyway please".

      If it turned out to be worse, they would just keep selling the iPhone 6...

  18. But it handles 400 flying monkeys! by the_skywise · · Score: 2

    Nothing says performance like that!

  19. BS on the bokeh by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

    iPhone 7 Plus has a pair of 12MP cameras that are able to take SLR-quality images. It offers bokeh capability

    Bokeh is a function of the lens diameter relative to the subject distance (and distance of other objects from the focal plane). For a given scene, cannot be created any other way other than a physically bigger lens. You know the penumbra during an eclipse (the area experiencing a partial eclipse during a solar eclipse)? That corresponds to bokeh. There is nothing you can do on the ground to enlarge this area. It is purely a function of geometry. (Mathematically, it's the point distribution function of the lens.)

    You can fake it in software. I've been saying for over a decade that two small lenses with some lateral separation should allow an algorithm to estimate distance and blur the parts of the picture outside the focal plane appropriately to simulate bokeh. But it's not real bokeh, it's a digital manipulation.

    1. Re: BS on the bokeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's 2 lenses one wide one not in the plus. There's some amazing work in their camera. Several hundred people alone work on just the camera and app.

    2. Re:BS on the bokeh by krisbrowne42 · · Score: 1

      And yet, everyone and their brother will be slavishly attempting to copy the effect on other devices within months...

      Tilt/shift is another physical effect that has been recreated with software to decent effect... For those of us who don't have the budget for extreme glass, software is easily good enough.

    3. Re: BS on the bokeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android's default camera app has had this feature since 2014.

    4. Re:BS on the bokeh by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can fake it in software. I've been saying for over a decade that two small lenses with some lateral separation should allow an algorithm to estimate distance and blur the parts of the picture outside the focal plane appropriately to simulate bokeh. But it's not real bokeh, it's a digital manipulation.

      Not sure I care. Reality is as my eyes see it, either way you're trying to manipulate reality except one limits you to physical effects and the other uses both physical and digital effects. Particularly if you are measuring focused light and simulate the out of focus effect you could have had with a different lens, I think it's more in the direction towards adjusting color/contrast/white balance and not photoshopping in Gollum. I suppose if you're in some kind of nature photography competition or news reporting where accuracy to reality is paramount this might be off limits, but for average people who'll just as easily use snapchat and instagram filters this is about a 1/10 on the photo manipulation scale.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:BS on the bokeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, others will be copying Apple? Not so fast, I've had this feature on my Nexus 6 for a long time (newer Nexus have it as well), they called it, "Lens Blur".

    6. Re:BS on the bokeh by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      I've been saying for over a decade that two small lenses with some lateral separation should allow an algorithm to estimate distance and blur the parts of the picture outside the focal plane appropriately to simulate bokeh.

      It seems to work well enough for the human visual system, which takes input from two "cameras" at about 17mm focal length and f/8 (outdoors on a sunny day), separated by about 65mm, and synthesizes it into the equivalent of a single 17mm f/0.25 image path -- not for total light-gathering capacity or resolution, but for depth-of-field control and the ability to "see around" extreme foreground objects.

      I don't care about "3D cameras" that take viewmaster-style image pairs. I want the kind of image processing that our brains do. It'll be interesting to see how close Apple comes to getting it right. What I've read so far looks promising.

    7. Re:BS on the bokeh by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      My Sony travel cam had this 5 years ago. With a single lens.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:BS on the bokeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are apps that already do this on the respective stores.

      There have been devices that have had dual cameras before doing the same thing: see HTC One: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2476104/smartphones/in-pictures--here-s-what-the-htc-one-s-dual-cameras-can-do.html

      Again, if anyone slavishly copies things, it's not the competition. Other companies have already tried this stuff and almost nobody cared.

    9. Re:BS on the bokeh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd rather they worked on low light performance. Compared to the Nexus 6P/5X the iPhone 6 is quite poor. It tries really hard to mask it with heavy processing, but just looks artificial and like it was taken under bad florescent lighting.

      To me this seems more like an admission that they can't fix the thing people really care about so here is a gimmick that will be spammed all over Instagram for a few months.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  20. Mod parent up... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I thought they were supposed to introduce wireless charging with this iPhone too...

    1. Re:Mod parent up... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I thought they were supposed to introduce wireless charging with this iPhone too...

      Man, you wish. Wireless charging is one of the best features on the S7. I have several of the pads/mats that I have laying around my apartment and at work. Any place I normally set my phone I have one. It is really one of the best features to have on a phone.

      I have a little "indention" in the console of my car where I normally set my phone. I'm trying to come up with a way to put a charging pad in there.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  21. able to take SLR-quality images by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the iPhone 7 Plus has a pair of 12MP cameras that are able to take SLR-quality images

    Don't lie to me.

    It has a tiny little sensor that assuming has perfect glass is just providing false magnification as the lens is a f/1.8 with a pixel edge size of about 1.2um (assuming the same size sensor as in the Apple iPhone 5S) but the diameter of the airy disk would be 3.7um. So the smallest item resolvable would fill about a 3x3 grid. Granted software can get rid of some of that but it isn't going to magically make it deliver results like a full frame SLR with good lenses.

    While it is probably a better camera than most other cellphones (seriously these cameras are shit) don't say it holds a candle to an older full frame DSLR or even my 40+ year old film SLR that has some really nice lenses with good film.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2

      Hear, Hear!

      MegaPixels plus near pinhole camera lens does not "SLR Quality" make.. Granted, as you say it's probably a nice (for a smartphone) camera, but no, optics and physics say it's not going to be anywhere near DSLR quality.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    2. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Arkh89 · · Score: 2

      What matters is not the diameter of the PSF itself, but the MTF (its Fourier's transform). The optical cut-off frequency is at 1/(lambda*F#) \approx 1010 lpmm (line pairs per mm) at 550nm (green color). The sensor cut-off is at 1/pitch \approx 833lpmm and the Nyquist frequency is at half that (416lpmm). So there is still a bit of information to suck still. Then it really depends on the shape of the PSF and how it lowers the MTF profile. These restrictions are physical and, thus, the same than for a DSLR.

      I am not saying than this camera is nowhere near that of a DSLR; but your argument does not work here.

    3. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see a cellphone camera that is as good as even my Canon PowerShot SX 120 IS and that is a few years old now and wasn't exactly top-of-the-line even back then.

      My camera has a physically bigger sensor and lens than any phone I have ever seen. And it has a proper optical zoom.

    4. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      There is more to (D)SLR quality than just sensor. There is lenses too. You really don't appreciate quality lenses till you have held a expensive SLR lens. There is a reason these fuckers cost $500 to a $1,000. It's because they are worth it.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    5. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      even my 40+ year old film SLR that has some really nice lenses with good film.

      If your 40+ yo camera is good enough, you can probably get a digital back for it.

    6. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      How about this argument:

      The entry level SLRs from the big vendors all allow you to use different lenses to effect a change in bokeh. They have higher MP counts. They all export RAWs for better image editing. They are all completely customisable in terms of ISO, aperture and shutter speed. They can all be mounted on standard tripods, dollys, etc... Futher, the experience of shooting through the lens is very different from that of shooting from the back of the camera. Further, there is a range of lens and flash modifiers to a SLR. You can add flashes (as many as you want) in configurations from on-camera, to soft boxes, hot lights, umbrellas, ring-flashes. Additionally, you can use Cokin type filters to adjust the image coming into the camera with star-filters, graduated neutral density filters, UV filters, circular polarising filters, etc.. If you want to do astro photography you can use a T-mount.

      SLRs are ubiquitous not because they have a sensor and a lens, but because they are supported by an ecosystem that makes them the professional's choice.

    7. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by shilly · · Score: 1

      Not only was this claim not made by Apple; Phil Schiller explicitly said: "We are not saying to throw out your DSLRs and that iPhone replaces all the DSLRs. What we are saying, is that this is the best camera we have ever made on an iPhone. This is the best camera ever made in any smartphone."

      So there's no need to get worked up over something they didn't say.

    8. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it's the crappy Slashdot summary that's lying, not Apple. Apple's actual claim (which is probably true) is that by using two cameras they can simulate the shallow depth of field of wide apertures that's often associated with SLRs. The summary just mangled that into "SLR-quality".

    9. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I will accept that. I have heard that iPhone cameras are the best or among the best cell phone cameras but that always seemed like having a discussion about who's shit stinks the least.

      On business trips to exotic places where I have a weekend free I bring my old film SLR and have been made fun of by coworkers who have cell phone cameras on a number of occasions at first. Afterwards when I get the pictured developed they are left realizing just how much better a proper camera is than a cell phone. When I can take a picture of the Dome of the Rock with a telephoto lens at a distance of about 2 miles, have it basically fill the entire frame, and when the picture is enlarged you can almost make out each stone in the exterior mosaics and clearly read the Arabic writing on it the difference between a cellphone camera and a proper camera becomes apparent quickly. In that instance my coworkers got to see one difference right away once I got my telephoto lens out and let them peer through it. I also got to show them another advantage of a proper camera with the ultra long exposure in a dark environment in the Stella Maris Monastery with the use of a bulb cable and tripod without a flash, that was an interesting adventure with that monastery with one of my coworkers.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    10. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The digital backs are usually only available for medium formats not 35mm, or at least I haven't seen a 35mm digital back conversion and I have done some looking. I have thought about going to digital but I like film and understand how film fails at the extremes so I will likely stick with it but would encourage anyone starting fresh to at least learn on digital initially as learning on film is expensive. after that then decide if you like film or digital as it is a personal preference unless you are doing commercial work or are a point and shoot type of person in which case stick with digital. Also given the age of my camera when it craps out, could be next week or could be in another 40 years, I will have to start all over again but am thinking of just making the jump to an older Hasselblad medium format that uses film but has the option for a digital back if I can find one for a reasonable price.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    11. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by shilly · · Score: 1

      It's great to see someone I think talking about least stinky shit is a bit hyperbolic, tbh. There are many circumstances in which an iPhone is completely inadequate for the task at hand, but an iPhone's camera system is now capable of producing some really beautiful photographs, including images capable of being displayed in huge formats (such as the large screen behind the speakers at the iPhone 7 launch).

    12. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by shilly · · Score: 1

      Argh, distracted by kids and hit submit too soon. I was re-writing the start of my comment to say that it's great to see someone on Slashdot willing to change their mind when presented with facts they didn't previously know... but that I thought your comment about least stinky shit was a bit hyperbolic.

    13. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I have always viewed cellphone cameras as being of poor quality mostly because the only cameras I have used are nice film SLRs with good to really good lenses. To that end I just lump cell phone cameras into the same category as the old film point and shoots, in that they aren't great cameras but they are the camera of the masses and work for what most people want a camera for, to take pictures to capture an event. So long as the picture turns out reasonably non bury and has an acceptable exposure the picture is good enough. These were the cameras for the people who would also use 400 or 800 speed film and a 5x7 or 6x9 print would be as large as the print would go.

      Then again the pictures I take are either for my enjoyment to blow up and put on my walls, to enter into local competitions, or as contract work for others to be published in books. While it is a hobby for me I am pretty good at it and the "contract" stuff is mostly my wife telling me to help out one of her friends who needs some professional quality quilt pictures for a book they are writing and I basically get my costs covered and money for lunch.

      Also lets not forget the most important rule about cameras:
      The best camera is the one you have with you.
      So for the vast majority of people the best camera is their cell phone camera and it meets their needs just fine. So for the shit smells better comment it does apply as from a technical stand point but that doesn't mean that great photos can't be created with it. Just don't claim that by using objective measures it is even in the same class as that is silly, a Holga will never be a Hasselblad (both medium formats) just as my Pentax won't be a Hasselblad either).

      --
      Time to offend someone
    14. Re:able to take SLR-quality images by shilly · · Score: 1

      I guess the point I'm making is that we're long past the time where cell phones are only capable of producing non-blurry images with acceptable exposure suitable for a 6*9 print. They're now good enough to produce pictures that look good when blown up and put on walls or put in books. Or indeed displayed on large screens behind a speaker in a room with 7000 people. I'm not claiming that they are as good as a DSLR or a Hasselblad; I am claiming they're much better than an old film point-and-shoot.

  22. wide-gamut color by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see that they are improving the color spaces that can be displayed on their screens. Maybe someday we'll be able to have a true orange on our monitors.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by phishybongwaters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Courage my fat fucking ass. They removed the headphone jack to SCREW every customer into needing to either replace ALL of their sound equipment, or purchase expensive ass proprietary dongles. That is the 1 and only reason, no, the headphone jack is NOT the reason your phone isn't a millimeter thick, it's because fucking technology has not got there yet, forcing all of my stereo equipment into obsolesce is not courageous. It's clearly a desperate move from a company that's losing marketshare everytime they check the numbers, a company that flat out refuses to actually innovate while promoting their stolen features from competitors who beat them to the market by years "innovation" is pretty fucking funny. But this is indeed innovation, it's an innovative method to fuck each and every customer into having to replace a bunch of shit that doesn't need replacing.

    1. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by mugnyte · · Score: 0

      Change is hard. For some, impossible.

    2. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it isn't courage it is pure greed.

      The problem isn't just Apple though -- it is all the other iHipsters would don't understand the fuss.

      The audio jack works just fine on my iPhone -- I don't need yet another stupid cable to listen to my Sennheisers.

    3. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Two things:
      The expensive ass proprietary dongles are free and included with the phone.

      The 1/8" stereo plug is over 50 fucking year old. I'm not sure this is the answer, but it's shitty technology

      and you're a dumbass, so I guess it was "three things"

    4. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by imgod2u · · Score: 4, Informative

      They include the dongle with the phone...

    5. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "a company that flat out refuses to actually innovate"

      That is the crux of Apple's problem. Living off of Steve Jobs' legacy. Tim Cook is a suit, nothing more. He's milking the Apple brand for all it's worth but time is running out. Google and Samsung are already eating Apple's lunch. Heck Microsoft could make a come back. Bye bye Timmy...

    6. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change is hard. For some, impossible.

      And then there is intelligence, which is obviously out of reach for you.

      captcha = bordello, where your mommy works.

    7. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They include the dongle with the phone...

      That's only a short-term compromise to avoid pissing off the world too much. In the long term headphone makers will start producing Apple-only lightning headphones. Those headphones will have to license Apple since this new interface can negotiate the connection. They will consequently cost more. Moreover, it's a DRM ploy since regulating which devices can connect will also regulate how the media played through that interface can be copied.

    8. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

      And you're and idiot. Change for the sake of change is a pointless waste of time.

    9. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can't listen and charge at the same time. This is the key sticking point with those dongles. If I'm on a long car trip and using GPS, I NEED to have my phone plugged in so it's not dead on arrival, but would also like to plug my phone into my car stereo via mini-jack. Thanks to Apple's "courage", I can do one or the other, but not both. Bluetooth is not an option. (1) Bluetooth in it's current form is a compressed craptastic standard, (2) Bluetooth car audio features craptacular in-dash interfaces, (3) older vehicles (even the luxury ones) don't offer Bluetooth. So someone please get busy making a lightning adapter that offers USB *and* 3.5 mm jack, and then I'd upgrade my iPhone. If not, Android is looking better and better every day...

    10. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I have to say, this reminds me of when they ditched serial ports on the iMac. It wasn't really the end of the world, and this won't be either. For one, I don't have to buy an iPhone, just like I never bought an iMac, so it doesn't affect me directly.

      Secondly, the existing situation is less than ideal; for example, my daughter's phone is in an Otterbox, and the aux-in cable in my car is too big for her to plug it in. Some sort of wireless solution would, in fact, be better; even though my car hasn't got built-in Bluetooth, I'm sure I can add something for under $50.

      So you should probably get the new LG V20 and be happy!

    11. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Mike · · Score: 2

      The dongle is worthless to me if I cannot charge the device at the same time.

    12. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Megol · · Score: 1

      Change for the sake of change is simply stupid. Change that 1) increases power consumption (it is impossible to decrease it with a dongle or the wireless solution) 2) removes compatibility with 99.999%+ of existing devices is simply fucking stupid.

      NB that not even the water resistance is a valid excuse as it is trivial to create water _proof_ 3.5 mm jacks. Battery life increase? Ludicrous, do the calculation yourself.

    13. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by erapert · · Score: 1

      The expensive ass proprietary dongles are free and included with the phone.

      True. But, speaking for myself not for Rob MacDonald, I would prefer not to deal with dongles connected to dongles plugged into my phone through a dongle just to use headphones or a car stereo jack with my phone. Especially since plugging in a wire has worked just fine so far.

      The 1/8" stereo plug is over 50 fucking year old. I'm not sure this is the answer, but it's shitty technology

      Calculus is over three hundred years old: being old doesn't automatically make something bad or wrong.
      Furthermore, it's asinine to assert something is "shitty technology" without giving at least an example of how the same could be implemented better.

      and you're a dumbass, so I guess it was "three things"

      Sigh...

    14. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by PRMan · · Score: 0

      But, but... he's gay! And that's SOOO courageous!

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    15. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit I love Slashdot. Now "included in the box with every single phone" is the same as "purchase expensive ass proprietary dongles".

      I guess you are correct if you say you are purchasing the dongle, which comes with a free iPhone 7 in the box. The rest of your post is just the screed of echo chamber groupthink, almost as bad as the horseshit being spewed forth by Apple fanboys.

    16. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Apparently it takes more courage to make the default stocks app removable.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      They removed the headphone jack to SCREW every customer into needing to either replace ALL of their sound equipment, or purchase expensive ass proprietary dongles.

      Why would I need to replace ALL my sound equipment? Everything I own already works with a Lightning connector as USB is starting to be everywhere. For those that don't I could use a dongle. So far it's free with the phone and it may be as high as a few bucks.

      That is the 1 and only reason, no, the headphone jack is NOT the reason your phone isn't a millimeter thick, it's because fucking technology has not got there yet, forcing all of my stereo equipment into obsolesce is not courageous.

      You are aware that the iPhone 6 was at very limit of thinness with a headphone jack, right? Seriously everything else on the phone had gotten thinner including the Lightning connector. This was the absolutely last thing that was keep the phone from being thinner.

      Also it wasn't just about thinness. Smartphones these days are packing more and more into a smaller package. From GPS to better cameras to motion sensors to bigger batteries, space on the inside of the phone is at a premium.

      It's clearly a desperate move from a company that's losing marketshare everytime they check the numbers, a company that flat out refuses to actually innovate while promoting their stolen features from competitors who beat them to the market by years "innovation" is pretty fucking funny.

      Apple is probably very sad that they have a tiny market share yet make more profit on phones than most of their competitors combined. Seriously in the smartphone market only Apple and Samsung seem to be making profits.

      But this is indeed innovation, it's an innovative method to fuck each and every customer into having to replace a bunch of shit that doesn't need replacing.

      Then don't buy one. Just because Apple release an iPhone 7 doesn't mean people have to smash their old iPhones with a hammer immediately.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by erice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two things:

      The expensive ass proprietary dongles are free and included with the phone.

      The 1/8" stereo plug is over 50 fucking year old. I'm not sure this is the answer, but it's shitty technology

      And the wheel is over 5000 years old. Do you have a better idea?

      Just because a technology is old, doesn't mean it not still the right solution.

    19. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by jmkaza · · Score: 1

      The only way they're forcing your stereo equipment into obsolescence is if your stereo equipment consisted solely of a pair of wired headphone.

    20. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I kind of agree with you, but I think a lot of people don't really care about huge innovations in the smartphone space anymore. The smartphone market is mature, stable and relatively saturated now. Every man and his dog owns one. In the first few years of iOS and Android devices, obviously huge innovations and gains were being made every year. But the phones on the market are all damn good. I struggle to think of anything that would be a massive life-changing improvement these days. So I'm fine with just seeing incremental improvements each year. It's a bit like cars - this year's Toyota is not radically different to last year's, but no-one really expects otherwise.

      I think if someone is going to have to come up with an entirely new product category before we see huge innovations again. Apple tried with the Watch, and it's been modestly successful, but let's face it, a lot of people just don't wear watches.

    21. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      My Bro in law will buy this piece of crap simply because it says "Apple" on it. He's part of the Apple cult. He's also the guy that can't type a reply to a message or originate a message containing more than 4 words.

    22. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. How many more phones with increasing model numbers is Apple going to make before they invent something?

      This sort of reminds me of HP milking the inkjet cow for decades and farming out product development or acquiring vs. inventing.

      Come up with something new, Timmy.

    23. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Except it isn't like that, because A. they replaced it with something that is objectively better in every respect, and B. nobody carried around a printer with them in their back pocket.

      This is fundamentally different than any previous Apple "transition", because it removes functionality that connects a device that you carry around in your pocket to another device that you carry around in your pocket. Adapters are not even sligthly annoying on fixed assets like printers. They are mildly annoying on semi-mobile assets like laptops that you carry around in a laptop bag. They are intolerable on a cell phone.

      Cell phone manufacturers have tried insisting on nonstandard connectors and adapters before. In every single case, they eventually gave up and moved back to commonly available standards. This isn't courageous. It is arrogant and brazen. There's a difference.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    24. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the iPhone 6 was at very limit of thinness with a headphone jack, right?

      You are aware that the camera still sticks far enough that they could have made a similarly sized bulge and put in the existing headphone jack, right?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      this reminds me of when they ditched serial ports on the iMac.

      Didn't you hear? We're not supposed to mention the Macintosh today. Didn't you get the memo from Apple Marketing?

    26. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      But, but... he's gay! And that's SOOO courageous

      Maybe 20 yeas ago it would be. But today I can't think of why anyone would give a flaming fuck.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    27. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by shilly · · Score: 1

      Such a shit analogy.

      The wheel is a concept, just as an audio output jack is a concept.

      Specific instances of the wheel include, for example, car wheels and tyres. Would you want a new car whose wheels and tyres hadn't improved in 50 years? Your car would have worse handling, be noisier, use more fuel, go slower, etc etc.

    28. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by houghi · · Score: 1

      So they agree you need the dongle. Build it into the phone then already.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    29. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secondly, the existing situation is less than ideal; for example, my daughter's phone is in an Otterbox, and the aux-in cable in my car is too big for her to plug it in.

      This is a problem with the case design, not the 3.5mm jack. Also this can be fixed simply by using a smaller cable. Bluetooth in a car can be nice for making calls and such without having to touch the phone, but that is the only scenario where I see any advantage at all to bluetooth.

    30. Re:Courage, it didn't come, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to post angry but this is just a STUPID FUCKING STATEMENT and one I am too sick of seeing shit like this bandied about to leave it alone.

      Do you only use hand-hewn stone wheels in your idealized fucking world? Clearly you don't drive a car since the tires on cars are countless iterations beyond whatever-the-fuck bullshit concept of a "the 5,000 year-old wheel" you have bouncing around in that self-righteous bone-box-of-a-head you've got.

      And I suppose that ideal, unchanged-throughout-history, Flintstones-looking wheel of yours isn't attached to a rim, or a u-joint, or a differential, or any other "new-fangled doohickey"; you just roll around on your great 5,000 year-old wheel.

      Things fucking change Cave Boy. I'm not saying dropping the headphone jack on the iPhone was or wasn't good. Time will tell. But take your fucking Reader's Digest homey fucking wisdom and shove it up your 3.5mm asshole.

      Thanks!

  24. Terrible headphones by brantondaveperson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The existing earpods have a habit of falling from my ears - and now they're not even going to be attached to some wires? Great.

    1. Re:Terrible headphones by Huge_UID · · Score: 1
      http://www.imore.com/three-accessories-keep-earpods-your-ears-when-youre-working-out

      I briefly wondered if my Sprngs would work with the AirPods, but then I realized there is no way I am spending $159 on earbuds.

    2. Re:Terrible headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://i.cbc.ca/1.3751692.1473274042!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_460/apple-iphone.jpg

      I honestly have no idea how they expect those to stay in anyones ear. Besides them looking like futuristic crack pipes, is a boom mic per ear really necessary? ...or maybe you're supposed to implant the stick side in each ear, that would hold securely!

  25. Re:Courage? To profit. by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Exactly my point, the applefan boys will argue, but you've nailed it 100%, we used to point to apple as the definition of "planned obsolescence" but this.... this is just obscene. This is too much. This is beyond bullshit and every single braindead apple moron thinks its GREAT! YAY! static and bullshit for all, continually disconnecting earbuds for EVERYONE.. But don't you dare attach this to a non apple device, no sir, we're going to tax you for that buy licensing the pretend better bluetooth tech at ridiculous amounts.

  26. Courage, of course... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

    is Apple marketing speak for, "We will now be able to sell you a whole new set of branded accessories that you wouldn't have otherwise needed."

    Prediction: This version of the iPhone sells significantly worse than the previous two.

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  27. Would he ever say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "It's the worst iPhone we ever created!" - Tim Cook.

    No, I don't believe he would say that... so why would someone quote him for saying something so unbelievably stupid. I mean, actually replying with the word courage on how they screwed the pooch on analogue is pretty good. Basically, they can say anything they want and they will ship a bazillion phones. I suppose I bought my last one.

  28. Eeek - Louder Speakers!!!! by lloy0076 · · Score: 1

    Great, now I get to hear the OTHER end of the conversation on the bus too :(

  29. Courage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMhwddNQSWQ - Weird Al - Dare to be Stupid!

  30. No wireless charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless charging was the one feature that would have made a clear, tangible improvement in the way I use and enjoy my phone. Really disappointed it wasn't rolled out this iteration.

    Guess I'll wait for the 7s, it's sure to be on that one, right? Right guys?!

  31. No new mac hardware by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    They are getting very old and can at least use some price cuts / ram / cpu / disk bumps.

    1. Re:No new mac hardware by lusid1 · · Score: 2

      The hardware shipping now is technologically ancient. There has been any "new" mac hardware in a really long time. Just old crap in new boxes.

    2. Re:No new mac hardware by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We aren't supposed to bring up Macintosh today.

  32. jack off by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  33. Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    The phone ships with an adaptor that gives you back the audio jack you could copy from if you wished... no more DRM than before.

    It just ALSO gives you an improved audio path that provides power to headphones.

    What is wrong with having an improved set of choices? More importantly what the FUCK is wrong with people like you who should be embracing technology, being steadfastly against any change?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From my point of view, it's a poor implementation. Essentially most people will now have to carry two items around with them - a phone and a dongle - rather than just the one, or else not be able to hook the phone up to a standard audio system.

      I also wish we'd wait for an agreed standard. Lightning is essentially a Apple-only standard. Lightning headsets will only ever work with Apple devices, we need a good common digital standard.

      What I would do, if I had a million dollars, is produce an iPhone 7 case with the 3.5mm adapter built in. I'd also add USB (with charging available) just for completeness. Everyone buys cases for their phones anyway, and that'd resolve the entire problem so nobody has to carry around multiple adapters.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More importantly what the FUCK is wrong with people like you who should be embracing technology, being steadfastly against any change?

      Not all technology or change is good or desirable.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Essentially most people will now have to carry two items around with them - a phone and a dongle - rather than just the one, or else not be able to hook the phone up to a standard audio system.

      I haven't connected my phone to an external audio system over wires for about two-three years now. That's doubly true of any non-technical people I know, who all simply use bluetooth for smaller external speakers and just do not connect phones to stereo systems at all. 99% of people will just carry earbuds with them as they do today, either the included ones or other ones they like with the adaptor attached.

      Just today I wanted to watch a presentation in an office, but had forgot my headphones... a co-worker offered to loan me his. They were wireless...

      I also wish we'd wait for an agreed standard. Lightning is essentially a Apple-only standard.

      If you just keep waiting it could be nothing will ever change. If everyone waits, nothing will ever happen - by Apple doing this perhaps it will drive Android makers to form a standard.

      What I would do, if I had a million dollars, is produce an iPhone 7 case with the 3.5mm adapter built in. I'd also add USB (with charging available) just for completeness.

      You could call it the HomerCase. :-)

      It's probably a really good thing you do not have a million dollars.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by iCEBaLM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The phone ships with an adaptor that gives you back the audio jack you could copy from if you wished... no more DRM than before.

      Except apps/the phone could refuse to play back certain "rights managed" media if it detects the adapter, or even worse, a non-beats/apple manufactured headset is connected.

      "Sorry, this media is exclusive to Beats(tm) headphone users only."

    5. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is the right of the content owners. You're free to not buy/consume it, as well as free to create your own content and not have those limitations. There is nothing wrong with the producers/owners from dictating the terms of consumption of their property. This is just as bad as people like Stallman complaining that all software source code should be available to which i disagree. As the content creator/owner, I get to decide the environment under which my software will operate, and reserve the ability to change or kill it at my whim. Competition covers the rest.

    6. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I see zero improvement here. Embrace your will-restraining lobotomizer, too, SuperKendall. It's super high-tech.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    7. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's doubly true of any non-technical people I know, who all simply use bluetooth for smaller external speakers and just do not connect phones to stereo systems at all.

      I find the non-technical people I know use 3.5mm jacks to hook up their phones to car stereos. They don't like Bluetooth, it's fiddly and awkward and, if it's not your car, means you have to figure out how to pair with that model. 3.5mm "just works".

      If you just keep waiting it could be nothing will ever change. If everyone waits, nothing will ever happen - by Apple doing this perhaps it will drive Android makers to form a standard.

      First off, let's remember we're talking about setting a standard. Android phones already come with a "just works" digital hookup for headphones, and speakers, and 5.1 speakers, and whatever else you want - it's called a USB port.

      There's a difference between Apple going first saying "Let's make a standard" and Apple going first and saying "Here's our proprietary way to do this." It certainly won't drive Android makers to encourage the use of the USB audio, because Apple's showing no signs of being prepared to adopt USB. And without universal adoption, you're just going to end up with a Betamax/VHS set of competing headphones, if Android phone makers went in that direction.

      They won't, of course, they'll just carry on with the 3.5mm jack, for better or worse. I'm not a fan of 3.5mm - especially the hacky version we use today where slight voltage changes are used to signal "Play/pause/hangup/skip next track", and would like to see USB take off as a replacement. But, no, I don't see it taking off if the industry is split.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      From my point of view, it's a poor implementation. Essentially most people will now have to carry two items around with them - a phone and a dongle - rather than just the one, or else not be able to hook the phone up to a standard audio system.

      [citation needed]

      I admittedly don't have a citation EITHER, but I would strongly suspect that "most people" use the headphones that CAME WITH the device.. in this case, Lightning cable headphones. (I'm personally using $20 Bluetooth headphones..)

    9. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Willing to bet there's some API call that you can use to see if there's a 3.5mm dongle attached.... then it's just a matter of time before if(dongle) "then no music for you" DRM shit

    10. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly what the FUCK is wrong with people like you who should be embracing technology, being steadfastly against any change?

      Just what the Nazis said when they introduced the gas chamber to the Jews.

    11. Re: Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by bazorg · · Score: 1

      No more DRM than before.. For now HUAHAHAHA

    12. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      The improvement is, if nothing else, that earbuds can draw power from the device for things like noise cancellation.

      That's a pretty significant improvement even if you don't find any other aspect of it useful.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    13. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      How do you propose hooking this phone to the car audio system now? Has to be wired as no car stereo supports this new format or are they doing both bluetooth and this new format?

      Did they talk about cars at all? I am actually quite curious as to how this would work. a) Wired for audio, bluetooth for calls? b) all wired?

      Don't know about where you are, but it is illegal to wear headphones while driving in Colorado, so that is not really an option. What is their handsfree solution for driving?

    14. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      It's wrong because it's proprietary, and can only be used on iPhones (not even on Macs). At least they could have switched to USB-C instead of lightning.
      It's wrong because you have to carry a useless, easy to loose, shitty adapter every time you want to connect regular headphones. One port instead of 2 is less choice, not more. You could already use wireless headphones (and maybe even lightning) on old iPhones. Now you loose the 3.5mm jack. It's a loss.

    15. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      also you can't charge while the headphones are plugged in.

    16. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      I also wish we'd wait for an agreed standard. Lightning is essentially a Apple-only standard. Lightning headsets will only ever work with Apple devices, we need a good common digital standard.

      We have standard bluetooth, standard USB-C, standard S/PDIF (both coax and optical). Did we really need a new, Apple-only, "standard"?

    17. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with having an improved set of choices?

      So, let me see if I understand you: taking away the headphone jack and forcing me to use a proprietary adapter is an "improved set of choices". My god, why are you here on /. espousing the glory of Apple when it is clear you have such a bright future working with Microsoft marketing?

    18. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people can't hear the difference between MP3 and Lossless. I've even tried pointing out some heavy 64kbps MP3s that have the tin-y scratches to one or two people who literally asked me what the hell I was talking about.

      There's no need for an improved quality path, just like there's no need for ANOTHER wireless device standard. Even if there was an improved tech, there's no reason why you couldn't have both jacks, at least for a generation as people switch... instead of blindsiding everyone. Oh wait, $169 headphones instead of $5 LOL

      Also, try charging your phone and listening to music with wired headphones at the same time. Don't tell me to use the wireless headphones because they'll take much more power - if I'm charging I don't want to suck even more power out of it.

    19. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Change for the sake of change is not necessarily a good thing. Newer is not the same as better. We have fans of gadgets who worship anything new whether or not they are good for the consumer, and that's the market that Apple aims for. You don't need to be a luddite to recognize the drawbacks here.

    20. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only gives you the *potential* for an improved audio path. In practice it will depend in large part on the quality of the DAC that must now be included in each adapter or headphone.

    21. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my point of view, it's a poor implementation. Essentially most people will now have to carry two items around with them - a phone and a dongle - rather than just the one, or else not be able to hook the phone up to a standard audio system.

      People already carry around their phone, and a pair of wired headphones. So they will most likely leave the dongle attached to the tip of their headphones, and simply plug in the dongle, rather than the 3.5mm audio jack directly. Net effect - you carry around the tiny fraction of an ounce extra that the dongle weighs, attached to your regular headphones. And if you want to hook it up to a "standard audio system," you detach the dongle from your headphones, and attach the dongle to your "standard audio system" input cable.

      Why exactly do you feel the need to issue this breathless commentary that assures us the sky is, indeed, falling? This is such a non-issue it's ridiculous.

      What I would do, if I had a million dollars, is produce an iPhone 7 case with the 3.5mm adapter built in. I'd also add USB (with charging available) just for completeness. Everyone buys cases for their phones anyway, and that'd resolve the entire problem so nobody has to carry around multiple adapters.

      How do you get the USB power into your phone through this magical port? A cable? If that's the case, why not carry the fucking lightning cable they give you with the phone, and plug that in?

      What you're suggesting is turning the phone into a heavy brick with a case that adds extra ports, when the capability to do *everything* those extra ports would allow you to do already exists on the iPhone.

    22. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, but it would never fly. Having a device that directly plugs into a Lightning Port and has more than one port on it is verboten per the Apple Accessory Interface Spec (R25 - current). It won't pass, you won't get your MFi chips - and thus it won't work with any iOS device.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    23. Re: Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by fortfive · · Score: 1

      The only problem with your theory is that now i can no longer listen through my preferred (wired) cans and charge at the same time.

    24. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except apps/the phone could refuse to play back certain "rights managed" media if it detects the adapter, or even worse, a non-beats/apple manufactured headset is connected.

      Apple COULD also rig the iPhone to overload and explode if Siri overhears somebody saying "Ok Google," too. But they're pretty fucking unlikely to do that.

      You've been reading too much dystopian fantasy, friend. Apple - who was one of the first large-scale music sellers to actually get the labels to drop their DRM requirements - is not likely to suddenly start locking down audio circuitry so you can't use their devices with any other components. It would literally fly in the face of decades of precedent on their part.

    25. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      How do you propose hooking this phone to the car audio system now? Has to be wired as no car stereo supports this new format or are they doing both bluetooth and this new format?

      It is exceedingly unlikely that they would be removing bluetooth support (and if they were, somebody would have mentioned it by now.) Presumably they will be supporting both.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    26. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It just ALSO gives you an improved audio path that provides power to headphones.

      No, the new phone doesn't give you anything improved. The old phones could already do this. The lightning port always did route audio and power.

      What is wrong with having an improved set of choices?

      Nothing. This phone gives you fewer choices. It's exactly the same capability as the previous model with one option removed.

      More importantly what the FUCK is wrong with people like you who should be embracing technology, being steadfastly against any change?

      Um gee, I dunno. Maybe because we're capable of thinking rather than blindly calling all change good?

      The only extra capability you get with the new phone is a marginal improvement in thinness compared to the old one. This is at the expense of heavier use of a less robust connector. Change is only good if it's an improvement.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    27. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I find the non-technical people I know use 3.5mm jacks to hook up their phones to car stereos. They don't like Bluetooth, it's fiddly and awkward and, if it's not your car, means you have to figure out how to pair with that model. 3.5mm "just works".

      Last time I had a rental car, I hooked up my phone with bluetooth. I did it despite being fiddly and awkward, because I don't like accepting it was too hard. It was a pain and the controls were oddly behaved. Then I switched over to the 3.5mm audio cable I had.

      First off, let's remember we're talking about setting a standard. Android phones already come with a "just works" digital hookup for headphones, and speakers, and 5.1 speakers, and whatever else you want - it's called a USB port.

      Well, the lightning port also does analog. It's also potentially better than USB micro in that micro is really deeply crappy. But Apple make crappy cables so it's a wash.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    28. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It just ALSO gives you an improved audio path that provides power to headphones.

      So in order to get this wonderful new feature we had to remove something that provides compatibility with billions of devices out there or else use a dongle. Sorry that was wrong. I should have said "or else swear at the fact that we don't carry the dongle absolutely everywhere."

      Yay progress...

    29. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I haven't connected my phone to an external audio system over wires for about two-three years now. That's doubly true of any non-technical people I know

      The most technical people don't do it via the jack but via some wonderful streaming system. The non-technical people are the ones who like the idea of driving down the road and thinking oooh lets listen to some music and plugging their various devices into the audio input jack of the car head unit, or sharing some music with friends who have their earphones with them, or go to their colleagues at work and say here have a listen to this, and just grab the first headset they see on people's desk.

      Technical people work around stupid shit like this. This affects the least technical people the most.

    30. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      USB-C could be a good standard but it was released after Apple had decided on Lightning. USB-C is slightly bigger than Lightning. I also find the setup of USB-C may not be as durable, IMHO.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    31. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      I also wish we'd wait for an agreed standard. Lightning is essentially a Apple-only standard. Lightning headsets will only ever work with Apple devices, we need a good common digital standard.

      Apple has a long history of eschewing standards in favor of their own approach. Sometimes this is in the name of progress, sometimes not. I'll never spend $170 on headphones, bluetooth or otherwise. Especially when said headphones are from a company that can't even seem to get the Bluetooth spec right for any third-party stuff such as my car, headphones, or data link to a tablet.

    32. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantastic. Meanwhile, I've got several pairs of headphones that are wired. They don't have to be recharged. I don't have to worry about distance. I don't have to worry about anything. They sound great, and they just work. You go ahead and chase solutions to a problem that didn't exist. Just make sure to keep track of your dongle for when this turd goes the way of Betamax.

    33. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to cave your fanboy skull in.

    34. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      More importantly what the FUCK is wrong with people like you who should be embracing technology, being steadfastly against any change?

      I think we were here already, at least a million times before. Should we repeat? I guess we should: adopting new for the sake of new is not rational, unless new also means better.
      The port in question is much flimsier than 3.5 mm audio jack. It doesn't allow for the phone to be charged while listening to music. It forces you to use a dongle.
      So it's not a better technology, it's just different.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    35. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh i see now.

      You are FOR innovation only when YOU think its in line with your Cult of CrApple overlords...

      Pathetic

    36. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Lightning is essentially a Apple-only standard.

      Um. No. It's an Intel standard. Many popular NAS devices have lightning connectors in addition to network. In fact here's a list for you.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    37. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by alcmena · · Score: 1

      Horray, so your phone can now die faster than before, and as a bonus, you can't charge it when you're stationary, like in an office.

    38. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      SuperKendall, can you tell us why digital isn't always better? I just want to see if you can say it.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    39. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by rikkards · · Score: 2

      One benefit of 3.5mm is doesn't kill your battery as fast as bluetooth

    40. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by lusid1 · · Score: 1

      ROFLOL. You're confusing lightning with Thunderbolt. just choked on my coffee.

    41. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by lusid1 · · Score: 1

      There is no audio in that path. It moves the DAC into the headphones or the headphone dongle. The apple/beats ones are probably decent, or at least equivalent to the one that used to be in the phone. The cheap crap from china will still sound like cheap crap from china though.

    42. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not as if there's no such thing as analog DRM. Encoded audio could be sent through a 3.5mm jack, and decoded by special Apple 3.5mm headphones.

    43. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Or you could just buy a samsung s7 or really any android device and still have the headphone jack, a USB charging, sdcards, waterproof, a kick ass screen, wireless charging, 64 bits and a nice quad core.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    44. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need to remove the 3.5mm jack to accomplish that?

    45. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Nope wireless charging for the sheepe.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    46. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      My ears push 12 VDC at 2.6 amps you insensitive clod!

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    47. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      The additional protection that a no-holes design gives the product really is at least something. Even us iOS-haters gotta admit this is a tradeoff, and it won't be wrong for everyone.

      Wrong for you? Fine; I totally understand. The overall product is wrong for me too. It'll probably be wrong for a lot of people!

      But some people are going to like the tradeoff, too. It's not a necessarily stupid idea on the face of it.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    48. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also wish we'd wait for an agreed standard

      You must be new here.

    49. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The most technical people don't do it via the jack but via some wonderful streaming system. The non-technical people are the ones who like the idea of driving down the road and thinking oooh lets listen to some music and plugging their various devices into the audio input jack of the car head unit, or sharing some music with friends who have their earphones with them, or go to their colleagues at work and say here have a listen to this, and just grab the first headset they see on people's desk.

      Even the technical people get stuck when they're not at home, because chances are their friend's house doesn't have an Apple TV or whatever.

      Technical people work around stupid shit like this. This affects the least technical people the most.

      That and developing countries. The difference between a $2 set of earbuds and a $2 set of earbuds with a $10 adapter is non-negligible, and will only further slow iPhone's growth outside of the first world when used iPhone 7s start to make their way to emerging markets.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    50. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, it's objectively worse in every way. There's exactly one situation where it could theoretically be slightly better, and that would be if manufacturers precisely tune the output of their powered amplifier circuitry to match the headphones, but even that won't be a substantial improvement, and comes at a high cost (which means almost no headphone makers will do so). And even in that situation, the only reason it would be slightly better is because Apple still hasn't bothered to give people any meaningful degree of control over the EQ curve of their headphones in iOS, which is fundamentally a software defect, not a hardware defect.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    51. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Not as durable as lightning? Pull the other one. I've yet to have a lightning cable (Apple or otherwise) last more than a year (usually months or less), and they cost a fortune! Meanwhile, I have never had a single issue with any USB cable or connector, despite using shitloads of them, being a mobile dev since before mobile devices even had usb.

    52. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget you can't charge your phone and use your 3.5mm headphones (via the stupid lightning dongle) at the same time.

      Cause...no one ever does that kind of thing, right?

    53. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      $2 earbuds?

      I live right in the midwestern United States and there are $1 earbuds at WalMart. Not a 'special' but right there, obscurely at the bottom right hand side of the rack with all the more pricey headphones. They are not bad quality, I haven't found a pair that was defective. The kitten eats headphones in our house* so unless it's high quality listening it's nice to have 'burner' headphones around.

      (*the last pair of $1 earphones I found weren't just 'cut' in on spot on the wire, they were chewed into pieces. I really love that cat, even with her quirks.)

      I can't imagine they charge more than that for headphones anywhere else in the world.

    54. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      It's wrong because it's proprietary, and can only be used on iPhones (not even on Macs).

      Apple is working on that problem by pretty much doing away with the Mac. Did you notice the absence of Mac stuff at today's conference?

      World Wide Developers Conference, and literally no attention paid to the Mac. The Mac Pro is four years old, non-expandable, and crickets from Apple about any new workstation-grade system.

    55. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Good catch!

      Great now I have Queen stuck in my head:
      Thunderbolt and lightning very very frightening for meeee, for meeeeee;)

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    56. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me what is a "standard audio system" connector?

      Just off the top of my head I can think of XLR, 1/4" phone, 1/8" phone, SpeakOn, RCA, banana clips, and bare wire (spring clips or binding post). Then there are the numerous combination audio/video connectors like MHL, HDMI, DVI, DisplayPort, a couple USB-C alt modes, and each seemingly with standard, mini, and micro versions.

      It wasn't that long ago that people would buy a cassette to 1/8" phone adapter to plug their iPods, CD players, or whatever, into their car stereo. I still have mine somewhere around here.

      What we've seen are electronics manufacturers make a lot of money on adapters. Which is inevitable in a way since each connector type has good and bad points, as they are all a compromise. Electronics manufacturers have also made a lot of money by supporting these connectors directly hoping someone would buy their device because it had the "right" connector built into it. Like some car models having a 30-pin iPod connector to connect the sound system to iPods, and allow for use of controls built into the steering wheel.

      I'm not a fan of Apple not including a "standard" phone jack but I understand their decision. I haven't used the phone jack on my iPod for nearly a year. I haven't used it because it broke. I've been listening to my iPod through the built in speaker, the iPod adapter I installed in my truck, the dock I have next to my stereo, and by W-Fi through my Airport Express. If there was a 30-pin to "standard" headphone jack adapter I probably would have bought one long ago, but I haven't found one. I gave up on finding an adapter, partly because I've found other ways to do what I want, partly because that iPod is now so old and worn I'm shopping for a replacement.

      What sucks about getting a new iPod is that my 30-pin connector cables and docks will have to be replaced too. I'm not going to cry about Apple abandoning the 30-pin iPod connector since I believe it wasn't that great of a connector, certainly not now. Firewire is no longer "standard" equipment on computers. Component A/V cables are uncommon as well. As demonstrated by my mild inconvenience in doing without the 1/8" audio connector for so long I've learned to do without that as well. When I do need it I know I can find an adapter.

      I was actually discussing something like this with a co-worker today but about video connectors, not audio. Not too long ago VGA ruled the world and so we had a lot of VGA displays. What came along to replace it was DVI but we didn't want to replace the display with the computer every time so we bought adapters. As displays were replaced over time we put the DVI to VGA adapters in a box until we needed one again. Now those DVI to VGA adapters are piling up in a box because computers are now coming with DisplayPort outputs. As our displays have VGA and/or DVI inputs we had to order more DisplayPort to DVI adapters today. New displays that we order tend to have one or more of DVI, DisplayPort, and MHL inputs.

      We will always need adapters. We will always be able to find adapters. If for some reason you cannot find the adapter you need then perhaps you are being too early or too late to the "standard". If your new cell phone can't plug into your audio system then maybe, just maybe, your audio system needs an upgrade too.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    57. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change to be "Cool" or change to something better?

    58. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Lightning is essentially a Apple-only standard. Lightning headsets will only ever work with Apple devices, we need a good common digital standard.

      Exactly. That's the worst part about this whole thing.

    59. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I have a rental car at this very moment, and when I start it up the bluetooth on my ipod touch hooks up to the car automatically and starts playing. When I stop the car and get out, the device pauses automatically. I don't even have to take it out of my bag. This is far, far better than plugging in a 3.5mm jack to the device, unlocking it, opening the music app, and pushing play. Even pairing the device when I picked the car up was really straightforwards.

      Now, granted, every other time I've tried this out, it's been a real pain. But when it works, it works really well, and it's miles better than fiddling around with leads.

    60. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I don't have to worry about distance.

      The wires are of infinite length?

    61. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you charge it while you are listening?

    62. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "Essentially most people will now have to carry two items around with them - a phone and a dongle - rather than just the one, or else not be able to hook the phone up to a standard audio system."

      But most people don't "carry around" a phone to hook up to "a standard audio system". It's not typical usage even though it is something you can do.

      Most people use the headphone jack for headphones and, in that case, you carry around two items already and the adapter can be left permanently attached to one of them. Likewise, people often connect their phone to the car (for example) and the adapter can stay with the car. It's no big deal for many use cases.

      People really reach to complain about petty things. A year from now it won't even be news. The headphone jack will go away from everything and no one will care.

    63. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like because nobody asked for this maybe?

    64. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      But the audio adapter dongle requires software keys that only Apple can provide. And can withdraw. So, it is DRM that hasn't been switched on. Yet.
      Don't give the monkeys the keys to the banana plantation.
      This leaves the key in the lock for future implementation. Don't give them a lock, or a key. Audio is all that is left for us now.

    65. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Apple knew that USB C was coming when they released Lightning, it had been in the works for a while. They could have been the first to adopt it, but instead decided they needed something proprietary to keep they high priced cable and charger business going.

      USB C has many advantages, like supporting HDMI without the horrible compression artifacts and complex dongle that Lightning uses. It's more robust too - the cables are designed to break first to protect the device from damage.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    66. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's actually a really good point. Android has supported digital headphones since at least 2012, probably earlier. Plug in almost any random USB sound card and it will just work on many phones, as long as they manufacturer didn't disable it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    67. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One benefit of 3.5mm is doesn't kill your battery as fast as bluetooth

      It also couldn't potentially be monitored. I don't recall bluetooth being especially secure, but perhaps someone can correct me.

    68. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with having an improved set of choices? More importantly what the FUCK is wrong with people like you who should be embracing technology, being steadfastly against any change?

      Here is the plan I'd have recommended.
      1. Keep the headphone jack. It is just that handy. If you don't like it, don't use it, but it is not making the case that much bigger/thicker.
      2. Remove the usb/lightning/etc jack.
      3. Replace it with a standard wireless charger with a standard usb-c connector, as well as a second headphone jack. Plug the usb from that charging pad to a PC and it would be like you had plugged the phone into the PC.

      In short you would have a pad say by your bed and another on your desk at work, while you may have one in your car in one form or another. Just set the phone in place and use it, no plugging in required. If you want to connect a set of headphones, well you still have the jack.

    69. Re: Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

      if I had a million dollars, is produce an iPhone 7 case with the 3.5mm adapter built in. I'd also add USB (with charging available) just for completeness.

      But not a real 3.5mm jack, that's cruel.

    70. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a rental car at this very moment

      What make/model is it?

      and when I start it up the bluetooth on my ipod touch hooks up to the car automatically and starts playing.

      So it just connects to things without requiring any setup?

    71. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      " Essentially most people will now have to carry two items around with them - a phone and a dongle - rather than just the one, or else not be able to hook the phone up to a standard audio system."

      OR...you can get the forthcoming Bluetooth buds and have zero wires to carry around with you.

    72. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What is wrong with having an improved set of choices? "

      Because the implementation it significantly downgrades the previous choice?

      The dongle solution doesn't handle movement well, you can no longer use headphones and charge the phone at the same time and now you need to carry around the adapter, which they know most people won't, so it's a false choice.

    73. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm amused that you compliment a "great catch" as if you got corrected on some niggling side-issue.

      Here's what happened: You were being a passive-aggressive "um," haughty jerk and you got told. But enjoy the Queen song, your lighthearted reference to it makes it all okay and so effectively neutralizes your humiliation at being shut down so completely.

    74. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was being a decent person and acknowledging error in a friendly way. Why the need to rub his face in it? Do you think that helps society?

    75. Re: Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish we could downvote comments on Slashdot

    76. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Right. Because people in developing countries can buy top-of-the-line Apple phones, but can't afford an extra $10 for anything else.

    77. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Right. Because Apple developed lightning just a few weeks before the iPhone 5 was released. They could have waited a year or two for USB-C to be available. No problem.

    78. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      What part of "when used iPhone 7s start to make their way to emerging markets" didn't you understand?

      Just because something is expensive when new doesn't mean it is expensive five years later. The one thing Apple has going for it growth-wise is that the hardware tends to keep working. But between the iPhone 6's digitizer failures and the iPhone 7 requiring a $10 adapter to work with headphones that cost pennies apiece, their recent history does not spell long-term growth in those markets.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    79. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought apple always waited to do things right , not rush to market. guess not

    80. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could do that if they wanted to, using the 3.5mm jack. Just because someone can do something unsavory with technology doesn't mean the technology must be avoided. You might hit someone over the head with a cellphone, therefore: cellphones should not be made.

      Consider Macrovision in VCRs. It didn't use a special connector or the D in DRM. You can manipulate analog signals to only work with hardware you want it to. DRM is built into HDMI, and can be abused, so maybe it's easier for abusers to abuse. But even though "rights management" can be used to the detriment of users in both analog and digital connections, by your reasoning an RCA connector could be argued to be superior to HDMI. Sure, RCA is easier and better even now in certain situations, but that's not a good enough reason to say that HDMI should not have been made. Nor is it even good enough to say that all devices with HDMI should have RCA plugs too, just because it's easier to restrict the signal with HDMI.

    81. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by torkus · · Score: 1

      USB-C fixes all that and comes with a complimentary bag of chips.

      Oh, and you'll also find it on newer laptops/docking stations. I'd be quite pleased with being able to retire my laptop and just dock my phone some time soon.

      dare to dream...

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    82. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The problem I see is with the pins. USB-C cables are female and the connectors are male. Than means the pins always will stick out in the connector. The pin housing could be damaged in the computer which requires replacing the connector. Lightning is male and the connectors are female. If the pins are damaged the cable has to be replaced. Just my opinion.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    83. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      USB-C fixes all that and comes with a complimentary bag of chips.

      Um. The tongue has 12 wires per side and is really really tiny. Maybe they've figured out how to make such a design not suck, but it remains to be seen.

      Oh, and you'll also find it on newer laptops/docking stations. I'd be quite pleased with being able to retire my laptop and just dock my phone some time soon.

      Retire your laptop? My laptop is way faster than my phone, has vastly more storage and RAM and of course runs all sorts of programs which my phone doesn't.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    84. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Do you carry your proprietary cable everywhere you go? Micro-USB power supplies and cables are ubiquitous, meaning you can visit your mom or any friend etc. and be able to charge if needed.

    85. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not an Apple fanboy, but I think the "oh noez, jack=gone" crowd needs to settle down and realize:

      1. There is a lighting to 3.5mm adapter.
      2. Its slightly larger than the 3.5mm plug that will already be on the end of your favorite 3.5mm audio cable (so its not some unwieldy dongle you'll have to carry around...most people will just leave it on their headphones/audio cable.
      3. Its $9. That's the price at the Apple store...probably cheaper elsewhere.

      I don't think they had a good reason for ditching 3.5mm. However, it wouldn't deter me in the least from buying an iphone 7 (were I going to buy one) based on the facts above.

    86. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the thing: If you have an iphone, you're not rooting it and running linux/android. DRM is at the OS level. If they want you to listen to a song only on Beats Headphones, they could also disable audio to the 3.5 jack of any current iphone (unless a Beats device is detected, say via a bluetooth connection)

    87. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by geoskd · · Score: 1

      It just ALSO gives you an improved audio path that provides power to headphones.

      Bluetooth is not now, nor will it every be a "improved audio path" There are multiple technical reasons why a hardwired solution is going to be better than wireless for the same cost in parts. If you wanted to spend several thousand dollars in highly specialized parts, you could conceivably make a wireless product which performs equally to the relatively cheap solution that is available in the iPhone 6 and below.

      This is a cash grab, pure and simple. Apple can shave $10 per unit off the cost of an iphone by offloading the high quality DAC, connector, etc... associated with the 3.5mm jack. Additionally, it will drive sales of their bluetooth products. Even the inclusion of an external adapter does not cost as much as the internal parts do because the external device can allocate significantly more room for parts meaning cheaper components at similar performance when they don't have to be super small.

      In the end, Apple made the same retard mistake everyone seems to be making. People only say they want smaller phones. When they have to choose between battery life and size, they will choose battery life every time, but most manufacturers force smaller size than optimal because it saves unit cost, and they try to spin the size as a product advantage somehow.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    88. Re:Where?? What is wrong with MORE CHOICE by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      OK, so we agree.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  34. Different ears by GregBryant · · Score: 1

    Now Apple is making their technology less accessible. I know a dozen people who can't use earbuds, either because of the shape of their ears, or their need for a hearing aid. They tend to try a bunch of headphones until they find one that fits or works.

    1. Re:Different ears by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      So don't buy Apple's headphones? It's not like those are the only ones that possibly work. Use bluetooth, or use the included lightning-to-mini-phono adapter.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  35. Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1, Troll

    Personally I don't get it.
    Loved it on my first generation Sony walkman.
    Not so keen on them in the past 20 or so years.
    Getting rid of it seems like a great idea... especially since so many phone makers already did it and Apple is merely following the trend set by others.

    People need to get over the headphone jack.
    Wires suck.
    Wired headphones suck even more.

    1. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth sucks hugely. When I click pause, it should stop the audio immediately, not 0.5 - 3 seconds later. I fucking hate it.

    2. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep a set of earbuds in the front pocket of my jeans. I only use them occasionally, but it is nice to know that they are always there, ready to go. No charging. No adapter to consider (I use them on my MBP and iPhone). I've put them through the laundry multiple times and they still work. If they finally quit, I have two sets of sub $10 replacements ready to go.

      They are cheap, durable, easily replaceable and compatible with every device I own (and have owned for the last several decades). Sacrificing any of these qualities for features I don't need is unwelcome.

    3. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by lusid1 · · Score: 1

      Wireless adds a lot of cost in dollars, battery life, and sound quality.
      Wired via the lightning connector means you can't keep the phone charged while driving if you live in a state with a handsfree mandate.

      The DRM risks are more subtle, like they were with HDMI, so the impact will take a while to manifest.

    4. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Interesting... My Trekz Titanium Aftershokz stop audio immediately on my old iPhone 5S running iOS 10 Beta 7 when I press pause. They do the same on my Plantronics headset.

      When I press my special button to switch to voice dialing, the music stops immediately and restarts immediately upon switching off of voice call.
      Quite snappy really.

      Perhaps it is that your particular headset is older or not quite as good.

    5. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      I wasn't referring to a bluetooth headset. Any of the 5-6 vehicles I've paired my phone to have this "feature".

      There is simply a delay, or lack of sync, between device and speakers. So it's utterly useless for watching video of any kind.

    6. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      But there is an adapter that allows one to plug into headphones and charge at the same time so you can drive listen to wired audio and charge your phone.

      Without the wired connector there is more flexibility in design, perhaps an ability to increase water and dust resistance and more room for a greater battery perhaps.
      So likely a better class of phones over the long haul. One less 50 year old legacy product is a good thing in my view.

    7. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Well it seems likely that it is more an issue with the hardware in the car. Perhaps they use ancient bluetooth components instead of what is available today.
      The stuff being put on the market today seems to not have the lag you are talking about which is nice.
      Car makers are more prone to use chinzy tech to cut corners.
      Have you found the same lag on higher end cars by chance?

      Do the 5-6 cars you found to have this issue also have a hard connector?
      If so then you could still stick with wired sound via an adapter I suppose.
      I saw that someone makes a lightning adapter that will allow you to connect the sound and also charge at the same time.

    8. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      My 2016 Acura ILX has the same annoying lag as every other vehicle I've ever used.

    9. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Seems like a longstanding issue with Honda/Acura in a brief search. Perhaps they still haven't fixed the issue.

      http://www.crvownersclub.com/f...
      and....
      http://www.9thgencivic.com/for...
      and.....
      http://empegbbs.com/ubbthreads...

      "FWIW I think I've found the bug in Honda's code. When the Honda sends a "Service Search Attribute Request" for the "Audio Source" service on my phone it's omitting the UUID. The UUID is required. As a result, my phone responds with "Unknown service" and ends up transmitting all audio as generic data.

      With the other devices I've tested, the UUID is there, my phone responds with the required information for the Audio Service, and all music gets streamed using RTP (Real Time Protocol)."

      Seems like there are other car makes that can have the problem as well, but it is not an inherent Bluetooth issue it seems to me. It seems more like a problem originating with the car makers and their implementation of Bluetooth in their audio systems.

    10. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by lusid1 · · Score: 1

      There isn't. The wired audio adapter consumes the port and has no provisions for charging.

    11. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this info. I always blamed bluetooth. It's true, all my cars have been Acuras and Hondas.

    12. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Waterproof 3.5mm jacks are already a solved problem. You can even buy them COTS.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Apparently it can affect Volkswagen as well and others.
      Some guy in one of the threads said his Passat had the same problem, but his wife Kia had no problem.
      Go figure.

      Cool thing is over time things get better. Don't know why Honda seems to be not moving on the issue, but I am sure they will at some point.
      Probably just need a firmware update or some sort.

      An now it seems with the newer bluetooth there is a protocol that delivers true 16 bit CD quality sound essentially, but still you can get better 24 bit sound only over lightning.
      At least in a car this may not matter, but would in a high end home audio setting.

    14. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      There is a company that makes an adapter that has a wired connector and USB for charging in the same adapter.

    15. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      good to know... I heard about it.
      What is their waterproof rating.... do you happen to know?

    16. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      I just want to watch Netflix while I drive.

    17. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I would rather you just drive. Safer for everyone else.

    18. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      I've found that "just driving" is far more dangerous. By not being subdued by TV, I haven't been locked up for road-rage incidents.

    19. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Well not entering road rage mode is a good thing at least.
      Although... I think I could get Netflix rage with a 3 second delay in an Acura.... that would drive me flippin' nuts.
      Might tip me over the edge all on its own.

      Much harder to watch Zombie Apocalypse if zombies are growling 3 seconds after they have already attacked.

    20. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      Precisely. That's why I stay wired.

      So if I get the new iPhone, I have to choose between watching Netlfix or charging my phone.....at least until another dongle comes out that lets me do both. But....it's still bullshit that this "upgrade" causes me to have to carry around extra parts.

    21. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I have an old connector to lightning connector for my car. It just stays there and if one of my kids wants to plug in their device. they just pull of the adapter part.
      Best of both worlds.

      You will just need a lightning connector that has an audio out and charger.
      You will be golden. Netflixing down the road at a furious pace.

    22. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would be the ultimate scenario. :)

    23. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      By definition that would be an unauthorized connector and could not carry any Apple endorsement.

    24. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      So do all of the gazillions of adapters that hordes of people use that you can pick up at the checkout in vast numbers of stores... yet for me at least they get the job done.

      Not certain it matters if apple endorses something for it to be useful for a particular person.

    25. Re:Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Belkin makes something to check out. Charging and headphones possible on the new iPhone 7

      https://www.macobserver.com/ne...

    26. Re: Why is everyone obsessed about headphone jack by Mike · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

  36. Lacks a headphone jack? So what! by mschuyler · · Score: 0

    What's the big deal about lacking a headphone jack? Every phone comes with an adapter that plugs into lightning anyway. Or you can go wireless. Headphone jacks are old technology that you simply do not need. Your headphones still plug in just like they always did. It's like having a cow because your new car no longer comes with a spare tire. Get over yourselves.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Lacks a headphone jack? So what! by Mike · · Score: 1

      How am I supposed to watch video and charge the phone at the same time with this dongle?

    2. Re:Lacks a headphone jack? So what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the adapter? You cannot charge while using headphones. The included headphones also have no pass through port for charging. As for wireless, nothing but a nuisance (extra charger, limited batter life, much more expensive).

    3. Re:Lacks a headphone jack? So what! by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      What's the big deal about lacking a headphone jack? Every phone comes with an adapter that plugs into lightning anyway. Or you can go wireless. Headphone jacks are old technology that you simply do not need. Your headphones still plug in just like they always did. It's like having a cow because your new car no longer comes with a spare tire. Get over yourselves.

      That is the problem. Now you have another dongle. Another dongle to be easily lost, and if not lost easily broken. Another dongle to put stress on the connector.

      Now what happens when you want to listen but need to charge. Now you need yet another dongle and hope that that y-dongle will allow you to charge and listen at the same time.

      Just because something is old technology does not make it bad. There are still plenty of 60 year old speakers that sound just as good as they day they were bought and sound better than brand new ones with all sorts of fancy research put into them, because in the end it is still the same underlying concepts. Just because a headphone jack is old technology does not make it bad, in fact because it has been around for so long and is so ubiquitous there is no reason to change it for change sake because now you are just breaking compatibility with millions of devices. Perhaps if they provided some substantial benefit from its removal, sure. But 'water-resistance' whatever that means and has been done before while keeping the jack, definitely is not a good enough reason. I also have yet to meet anyone at this point that gives a damn if their phone is thinner, so that sure isnt it either.

      Its purely change for change sake, leaving out the whole proprietary lock-in aspect

  37. No... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The EarPods that ship with the phone are wired, just using the lightning port instead.

    The new wireless EarPods you would have to buy, so if you don't think they will work, don't buy them. Personally I was worried about that also (while running the default pods will slip out of one ear) but the wireless pods may be batter, with the long stems against your cheek it seems like they would stay in better.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No... by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I do still think that it's a step backwards in some sense though. I realise that packing all that extra functionality into a 3.5mm jack has been quite a hack, but I can plug today's earpods into my macbook pro (and it's not even an especially new one), and the volume controls, play/pause, and the microphone all work. I used to provide this as an example of how integrated the apple product lines are.

      However, it won't be possible to plug lightning earpods into anything else. This isn't a good thing.

  38. Courage ? Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schiller wouldn't know what courage was if it bit him in the ass.

    Claiming a design change in a fucking PHONE is some sort of
    courage is reason enough for me to never again buy anything Apple
    sells.

    Courage is putting your life on the line for others. Courage is not giving up
    in the face of overwhelming odds. Courage is not anything to do with Apple or
    any of its products.

    Schilller, I'd spit on you if I ever had the misfortune to meet you, you fucking twerp.

  39. Liquid courage... by lusid1 · · Score: 1

    and too much of it

  40. Moving the goalposts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So when other phone manufacturers blatantly copy something Apple has done, Apple is the bad guy for not sharing with the world; when Apple catches up to where others have been, they're sheep?

    I'm sensing a double standard. And an idiot.

    1. Re:Moving the goalposts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be a double standard if Apple and their fanboys didn't always claim like it was their revolutionary idea...

    2. Re:Moving the goalposts by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      I sense an over-sensitive Apple fanboy ;)

      At no point did I say the others weren't sheep copying Apple for some features, just that in the specific instance of waterproofing (which Apple are pushing as one of the *main* features for this version) others did it first :)

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
  41. Dongle + Charge? by Mike · · Score: 2

    So how the fuck am I supposed to use my existing earbuds (which I just purchased) with the dongle while charging at the same time?

    This is an absolute requirement so that I can watch Netflix without it draining the fuck out of my battery.

    1. Re:Dongle + Charge? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      You should have called me before buying those earbuds. This rumor's been floating around for months. I would have advised you to hold off on any major earbud purchases if you were planning on buying an iphone 7 for netflixing.

    2. Re:Dongle + Charge? by Mike · · Score: 1

      I knew about the rumors, but the fucking vacuum ate my previous pair. I had no choice.

    3. Re:Dongle + Charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's forcing you to go out and get this new phone.
      Alternatively, you could buy a real phone, for half the price of the Apple "breakthrough."
      (I'd recommend Samsung S7 edge).

    4. Re: Dongle + Charge? by Mike · · Score: 1

      Nobody is forcing me, of course. But I certainly have the right to express my disappointment with my current phone's successor.

    5. Re: Dongle + Charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, it came out as a personal attack, but wasn't meant as such. Best,

  42. Same problem with your headphones?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If you keep the adaptor on your headphones how is it any harder to lose than your headphones? That's what I'll do with the adaptor, put it on my backup headphones and call it a day.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Same problem with your headphones?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you keep the adaptor on your headphones how is it any harder to lose than your headphones? That's what I'll do with the adaptor, put it on my backup headphones and call it a day.

      Because it's a tiny piece that can be unplugged with little force and little signs of it happening?

    2. Re:Same problem with your headphones?? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Too bad you can't charge your phone whilst listening to your headphones...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Same problem with your headphones?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your solution to the inconvenience of having to carry around a dongle is to also carry around headphones?

  43. Water resistance? by galabar · · Score: 1

    What is so difficult about making a standard headphone jack water resistant? Or is "water resistance" simply a distraction/spin?

    1. Re:Water resistance? by technothrasher · · Score: 1

      It's spin. My cheap little Moto G is IPX7 water-resistant and has a standard old headphone jack.

    2. Re:Water resistance? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      That's what OTHER people said. Phil Schiller clearly said that they removed it because it takes up space that they can use for other stuff, and the lightning port can carry audio. So they've removed the audio jack to provide more space for other components.

      Waterproofing was the thing that pundits and /. commentators speculated it was about.

    3. Re:Water resistance? by hucker75 · · Score: 0

      All mobiles should be waterPROOF by now, come on this is 2016. I normally leave my phone at home, as the chances of it raining and dying in Scotland are 90%.

  44. No Jack No Sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my headphone jack constantly.
    1. Headphones! I can't afford wireless headphones if I just dropped a bundle one a new phone, good ones cost a lot.
    2. Stereo! Either my place or my friends I often play DJ and the headphone jack makes that possible.
    3. Charging! So if I want to charge and plug headphones in i'm just sol? Not acceptable
    I was waiting to decide what phone to get and Apple made that easy. Next phone will be an android.

  45. Bokeh? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Is that some bullshit hipster-ass marketing speak for "Depth of Field" or what?

    Yup, ripped off from the Japanese in 1997.

    Fucking marketspeak assholes.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Bokeh? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Bokeh is the term for the shape of the circle of confusion (specifically, because it's not always a circle) caused by lenses in a non-pinhole camera. It's related to depth of field, sure, but it has a very specific meaning.

    2. Re:Bokeh? by shilly · · Score: 1

      Or in the real world... a term routinely used by photography professionals for the past ~20 years. For example, this *seven year old* article in a popular photography magazine: https://photographylife.com/wh....

      Marketspeak would have meant deliberately *not* using this term for this effect and using a term invented by Apple instead.

  46. Phil by azav · · Score: 1

    The word courage doesn't mean what you think it does.

    Jesus, man.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  47. Re:Courage? To profit. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So don't buy their headphones if they don't meet your needs? It's not like they're removing Bluetooth or something.

    What is it about Apple making accessories for their products that enrages people? Just don't buy the fucking thing.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  48. Legacy Features by ytene · · Score: 1

    Do they still, like, you know, make and receive telephone calls?

  49. Off the upgrade bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've consistently pre-ordered every two years to upgrade. The removal of the headphone jack has ended that. Looks like the included dongle does not support both charging and headphones at the same time (nor do the included lightning headphones). How am I supposed to plug the phone in my car for long trips to listen to music? Pure stupidity that they didn't think about the fact that people often need power while plugging in audio. If this goes for future iPads, same issue. Kids have headrest attached mounts, power and headphones for watching movies on long trips. Without power, they won't last long. Without headphones, parents will go crazy.

    Then there is wireless headphones... First, the absurd cost. Second, why do I want one more thing to have to carry around a charger for? Third, if they fall out of my ear, there's nothing to catch them as they fall. Fourth, if I'm on a plane or elsewhere that I might fall asleep while listening, they'll turn off if they roll out of my ear (and also get lost). No, I have no interest in wireless headphones.

    I have no problems with replacing old technology with better solutions. Lightning was a big upgrade from the old connector and functionally better than micro usb. It made sense. This change offer no improvements, and in some regards is a downgrade.

    I'm not really crazy about UX on Android nor build quality of Samsung and others, but looks like that's my next phone.

  50. 3.5mm jack by mugnyte · · Score: 1

    Folks, before you mindlessly type your rant about the loss of a headphone jack: Things like this adapter are going to be everywhere - and include lots of market competition. Your 3.5mm jack will appear like a "dumb" phone in the blink of an eye. Remember, we have 6.5mm to 3.5in adapters for some of us, USB adapters for others, adapters for onboard-mic headsets, etc. This is just another in a long line of slight refinements on an idea. The 3.5mm connector itself is a changed standard. Think of video - we have countless adapters for generations of video, including proprietary nonsense from several companies, include Apple. Most people aren't going to care.

    1. Re:3.5mm jack by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      Missed edit: "3.5.in" => "3.5mm" Please /., allow edits for up to an hour.

    2. Re:3.5mm jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you know that most of these standards were gradually introduced over years and usually for a very good reason and usually included in everything you buy? Not only that, 99% of the devices still have the jacks on the back because it's cheap and easy to include so you don't even NEED an adapter. Most people who buy new devices tend to have the cables included (my video card came with an HDMI cable, cable box with component. Will buying a car or another media player include an adapter? nope.

      Also, nobody buys these converters because nobody wants to carry them around. Those that do usually leave it plugged in. Most adapters don't have to be packed with you and taken on-the-go.

      Nobody even buys the hdmi adapter for their phones even though they can output better stuff than most set-tops.

    3. Re:3.5mm jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.5mm jack has been a standard since about 1964, and it was a revision from the 1800s...while it is old, it also is compatible with about a trillion devices.

      It also breaks anything else that uses the port...good bye iPhone POS, as your credit card swiper is worthless now. There's a number of very specialized devices that now won't work with iPhone because of it, and I don't see most of them rushing out significantly more expensive lightning versions, especially since devices with a jack dominate the market.

      They 'solved' a superficial issue or two, while creating about a dozen much more serious issues. For a company that claims to be all about UX, this is a major fail - everything that used to be literally plug-n-play now requires powering on, pairing, unpairing, syncing and dealing with the general subpar experience that is bluetooth (Trouble shooting? You mean power cycling?) OR carrying around an extra cable that should probably be sold in 10 packs they'll get lost/destroyed so often.

  51. Re:Courage? To profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause I'd rather be able to use the $12 el cheapos from Target that work perfectly fine for several months until they get lost/damaged than $40 for headphones of similar quality that have "licensed" the wireless feature. This seems like a cash grab by apple. The first revision will have a free dongle, the next may not.

  52. And the consumer loses again by nwaack · · Score: 1

    So why is Apple removing the headphone jack? Apple's SVP Phil Schiller said, "Screw you, that's why. We're Apple so if you don't like it you can go lick your sister." -- that's what he really meant.

  53. Cannot charge while using headphones by Mike · · Score: 1

    So now, when I watch TV shows on Netflix while driving, I cannot charge my phone at the same time.

    So when I get home, my phone will be almost dead instead of fully charged.

    I guess this does require courage.

    WTF

    1. Re:Cannot charge while using headphones by Mike · · Score: 1

      This is bullshit.

    2. Re:Cannot charge while using headphones by eagl · · Score: 1

      You must also have the courage to buy all new equipment to work with your new phone. Car doesn't have the right connector? Buy a new car to go with your courageous new iphone that doesn't work with anything else!

      Didn't IBM try this with the PCjr, back in the day? Someone might want to fwd some of those old ads to Apple since they've forgotten that someone tried this already and failed miserably.

    3. Re:Cannot charge while using headphones by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, after you drive under a turning semi-trailer, your almost-dead phone battery is less likely to start a secondary fire and further char your corpse.

    4. Re:Cannot charge while using headphones by Mike · · Score: 1

      If there's going to be a fire, may as well not be half-assed about it.

      I've been watching TV while driving for many years. Seriously, though, if I didn't I'd have probably been killed years ago as a result of some road-rage incident.

  54. How to pronounce "courage" by eagl · · Score: 1

    Apple calls it courage, I call it pathetic stupidity.

    I use regular headphones/earbuds with my iphone all the time and have no intention to change that. I also am all set up to use my iphone playing music in my car using the headphone jack, and I use the same earbuds for my laptop and iphone when I travel to reduce gear clutter. Apple made a huge mistake with the new iphone this time, removing the headphone jack. I could buy a complete high-end android phone for the cost of the idiotic dongles and adapters Apple expects people to buy to use with the iphone as an alternative to buying new *everything else*. Does apple really expect me to buy some goofy dongle or a new car simply because my nice current car only has a headphone jack aux input? Pathetic stupidity.

  55. Re:Courage? To profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it about Apple making accessories for their products that enrages people?

    Mainly I think it's the thinly veiled attempts to paint this a pro-consumer and labeling it as "courage". It's true though, pretty courageous to screw that many people.

  56. 7 revs and I still can't replace the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I replace my phone battery every year, and expect it to last at least 2 days without a charge in case I forget to charge at night. iPhone is a toy until it meets basic use cases. I bet they can't read my SD card either. How the fuck do people remove all their private data to cross the border if it's not SD removable? Bah, it's a toy.

  57. Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by ewhac · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Some years ago, I was privileged to engage in a discussion on headphone detection with some Apple engineers, who had clearly worked on the issue for some time, and I learned something surprising:

    The 3.5mm headphone jack standard... isn't.

    Even after you set aside the issue of cheap manufacturers releasing shoddy products, you're still left with the fact that there is no actual standard dictating dimensions, number of contacts, location of contacts, size of contacts, separation distance between contacts, etc. Different manufacturers can and do make them slightly differently. More crucially, there's also no validation authority to check that your products meet all the specs.

    Let's just take the most obvious dimension: 3.5mm. For ages, those phone plugs were advertised not as 3.5mm, but as 1/8 inch (3.175mm). So if you wanted to make something compatible with a "1/8 inch" plug, you might get your dimensions wrong. Apply this principle to every other contact's position and size on the plug, and you can see where this is going.

    Moreover, some phone plugs have five contacts (Apple's own, for example). The "meaning" of each contact is not standardized -- that ring in the middle may be microphone input, or the contact switch (answer/hangup) on the cable, depending on who made it and what it was intended to be plugged in to. Further, if the rings in your cheap knock-off aren't lined up with the socket contacts, then bumping the plug could cause the socket contacts to short across the rings, which would get interpreted as a button press, and your call gets dropped.

    The result of all this mish-mash was the Apple engineers found designing a (cost-effective) headphone jack that worked reliably with all headphones and headsets one might encounter in the world was simply impossible. You couldn't position the contacts in such a way that they would never short across two rings (some idiot may have placed their rings very badly). You couldn't know ahead of time which contacts did what, and probing at insertion time was fraught with other perils, especially if your contacts created a short across two rings. Despite their extensive research and massive efforts, they still got tons of support calls about how someone's cheap-ass headset didn't work in what has long been assumed to be a standard phone jack.

    So my theory is: They declared the problem insoluble, yanked the phone plug, and designed a new digital interface.

    An adapter for "3.5mm" stereo headphones will almost certainly be made available. Yes, you still have the compatibility problem with other "3.5mm" devices, but now the problem is in a $30 adapter, and not a $750 phone. It will be interesting to see how liberally Apple licenses their connector so that third parties can also furnish adapters.

    1. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by lusid1 · · Score: 1

      Lightning connectors add $20 to the cost of whatever they are used in. There are authentication ships inside the connector with unique IDs. Cloned chip IDs used by Chinese counterfeiters are eventually blacklisted by IOS updates, but for everyone else, it gives apple control over what accessories are produced and by whom along with a tax on each accessory sold.

    2. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet, no one else seems to have problems creating a 3.5mm jack, including Apple before today.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by werepants · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The 3.5mm standard may not be established in an ISO document somewhere, but in a practical sense it's as reliable a standard as you're likely to find. I've had lots of problems with Micro-USB, for instance - some cables fit in snugly, some fit loosely, etc. But I've never had a 3.5mm connection fail, and they are so simple and ubiquitous that they have allowed some neat third-party hardware (think Square payment systems). That's not the kind of thing you can roll out without a solid standard in place (either formal or de facto).

      The standard has been just fine for all previous generations of iPhone, and for other Apple hardware as well. This is just a money grab, and it's going to lead to new and needless complexity in one of the very few technology interfaces that had remained pretty foolproof.

    4. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Toshito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The result of all this mish-mash was the Apple engineers found designing a (cost-effective) headphone jack that worked reliably with all headphones and headsets one might encounter in the world was simply impossible.

      Curious, I've been using those headphone jacks for more than 30 years, on cassette walkmans, discmans, mp3 players, computers, dumb phones, features phones, smart phones... with "dumb" headphones and "smarter" headphones with a mic and buttons. And I never had any "compatibility" problem, or reliability problems other than the usual broken solder point. But even that has not happened to me in the last 10 years.

      They ditched the headphone jack because:

      1- they can make a thinner phone (totally useless feature, but it sells)
      2- they can sell their overpriced POS wireless phones
      3- they don't know what else to do to innovate

      And that's it.

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    5. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MDIX. Everybody else has been doing it for years. Surely Apple engineers aren't so far behind they are ignorant of something so common.

    6. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't make any sense.
      The headphone jack works on my 6S. It worked on my 4S. It's not like they have to re-invent it with every single new release, so they'd cut that cost. They can just use the same design that has already worked for all the previous models.

      Oh, some super-crappy headphones didn't work correctly with your iphone 7 ? Well guess what, they're not going to work with this one either.

    7. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People plugging into other devices aren't doing it for the microphone or the in-line controls. They're doing it to get audio to some other manufacturer's devices and just leave it playing. I've never seen a 3.5mm headphone fail to at least play music.

      In that respect, 3.5mm and 1/8 inch were engineered with some tolerances so that a fraction of an inch won't make much difference. One jack still fit in the other. Even if you had differences, most adapters cost an insignificant amount -- they can be found at dollar stores.

    8. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The result of all this mish-mash was the Apple engineers found designing a (cost-effective) headphone jack that worked reliably with all headphones and headsets one might encounter in the world was simply impossible. You couldn't position the contacts in such a way that they would never short across two rings (some idiot may have placed their rings very badly).

      If they decided the only way around this was to add additional contacts to the jack then I am incredibly disappointed in Apple's "innovation". Not to mention the fact that Sony solved this problem in the early 90s. Heck with one-wire digital signalling you can trivially detect if your own magical approved device is plugged in and change the function of the pins, and currently pretty much every device on the market is compatible with the 4 pin or 5 pin jacks on most mobile phones or media players. Again these have existed since the 90s. Speaking of the 90s do you even recall the 3.5mm Toslink? Yeah standard 3 pins with the ability to send optical digital signals too. I myself used a headphone jack as power output for a small project at university. When the assessor tried to mark me down because some idiot could plug his headphones into it, I plugged mine in to demonstrate a very simple headphone detection routine that was part of the circuit before the power was applied. Bonus marks.

      If Apple did this because they couldn't work around the problem then it's time to let the entire engineering team go. Copying other's hasn't done much for their innovation.

    9. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 1

      And, FWIW, I've used 30 and 40 (Gawd, the 70's were a long time ago...) year old headphones with a straight phone jack and a mini adapter in stuff that's less than a year old. Any compatability issues likely come from arbitrary specs for added features like media/phone controls, and I don't think I've ever failed to hear audio from a jack I could plug into - unless it was one of the really weird cases where people were using jacks for power or pedals or stuff like that.

      --
      Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    10. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, it's worked great all these years.

      If this was their concern, they'd have a USB-C right next to their Lightning port. TWO ports, not just one.

    11. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, no one else seems to have problems creating a 3.5mm jack, including Apple before today.

      Probably because Apple hadn't thought about the issue hard enough.

    12. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, no one else seems to have problems creating a 3.5mm jack, including Apple before today.

      Probably because Apple hadn't thought about the issue hard enough.

      Dude, they have entire buildings dedicated to designing the *boxes* they ship their products in.

    13. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by houghi · · Score: 1

      They wanted to copy what you did, but they were afraid you would sue them.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Dumping the Headphone Jack: My Theory by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not an American.

  58. Don't stop at .0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be sticking with my iPhone 6S for years to come. Remember kids, never update your iOS past the next major revision after it was released. This ensures a long life and usability. I will stop at 10.0 to ensure slowness and battery draining doesn't kill my hardware prematurely.

    Not necessarily endorsing your strategy, the update decision depends on the specifics of your CPU and more importantly the amount of RAM. Phone model is too crude an approximation of CPU/RAM, some will do 2 major upgrades no problem.

    More importantly stopping at a .0 is foolish. Its likely .1, .2, etc will include performance and battery improvements. You will most likely be better served going to whatever the current version of 10 is. Its the major upgrades (x.), not the incremental (.y), that sometimes hurt performance.

    Plus there is the whole security upgrade thing.

  59. Airpods is not courage by aglider · · Score: 1

    It is stupidity. We already struggle to keep up with the iPhone battery. Now we'll struggle also with the wireless earbuds. Yes, it's stupidity. iPhone 8 will sport back the 3.5mm socket.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Airpods is not courage by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the Mac Mini has a floppy drive...

    2. Re:Airpods is not courage by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Floppy drives were obsolete for years before going away. Headphone jacks don't face those pressures, and are not obsolete in any way.

    3. Re:Airpods is not courage by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      OK, optical disk. Anyway, in a few years everybody will have forgotten this, and call headphone jacks an artifact.

    4. Re: Airpods is not courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. What a fool.

    5. Re:Airpods is not courage by aglider · · Score: 1

      Courage is to make a real smartwatch with a SIM and use a google glass-like as the user interface. Anything else is just marketing, aka a way to squeeze money from users.

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    6. Re:Airpods is not courage by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      R&D costs money.

  60. It is not just an adapter by HeavenlyWhistler · · Score: 1

    These examples you speak of are simple adapters (wires). This situation is not just an adapter, but a DAC. It converts a digital signal to analog. The lightning port does not have analog audio output. Depending on which one you buy, maybe it does it well, maybe it does it poorly. An adapter is easy to get right, almost any brand will do, don't even think about it, just grab one off the rack. For a DAC, you now have to do your research before buying it, and your search results will return wave upon wave of cheap knock-off crap from China. Ever shop for a USB charger? Like that.

    1. Re:It is not just an adapter by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      Sure, just like people shop around for an audio interface, camera, USB mouse, etc. I'm not too concerned about the type of component (active/passive)

  61. all stupid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So,

    lets get this striaght.. Apple is ditching the headphone port to drum up another revenue stream.
    More products that are intended to be elitist tward the Apple name will flood the markets..
    More and more people wil begin Apple cliques more and more, they will isolate them selves, claim superiority, and begin the assimiliation process (spelled right look how its used)
    so Apple is not selling phones, they need more revenue to please the share holders and to screw more people in their maunfacturing towns...
    Courage,, nope more like desperation..
    look @ the numbers.. Android products seem to last longer, roll off the line with less issues, and generally have a better look, feel, capabilities, and user acceptance..
    Apple products seem to cost more, do less, last shorter then their competitors, and seem to potentially cause more issues(wi-fi/NTP/1969)
    Apple owners seem to be closed, etc..
    I gotta go, cant waste any more time on this..

  62. No headphone jack? by ai4px · · Score: 2

    Nope, they needed the cubic mm inside the case for.... well.... a 3rd camera? Really? I smell a rat. This was to make the headphone connector proprietary and allow them yet another shot at licensing dongles.

  63. Wagging the dog by dromgodis · · Score: 1

    Absolute brilliant move, Apple!

    By removing the headphone jack, they have ensured that people and media are so busy being upset that they fail to notice that there is nothing relevant new with the '7.

    1. Re:Wagging the dog by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      What new and relevant thing do you want to see in the phone? I for one can't really think of anything. I don't really need a better camera, for example, nor do I need any on-phone storage. LTE (or LTE-A) is plenty fast enough, no point having more bandwidth that I'm not going to pay the cell carrier for. Wifi is plenty fast enough. Games run fine on the -6 so they'll run fine on the -7. What's left?

      -Matt

    2. Re:Wagging the dog by dromgodis · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Apart from for wireless charging, I don't think there is anything amiss with the current versions. The "new version every X months" seems to me to be mainly a marketing thing to (1) show that you still exist and (2) keep the economy flowing in the echosystem of devices and peripherals.

      Just a thought: What if they had skipped the generation increase altogether, instead keeping the current generation for another year? Zero new development investment, just continued production. All existing cases and covers would work, just sell more. The only thing missing would be people upgrading to the latest version just because it's new.

  64. Re:Courage? To profit. by yodleboy · · Score: 0

    "What is it about Apple making accessories for their products that enrages people? Just don't buy the fucking thing."

    What is it that makes this so hard to get? No one complaining probably cares what Apple does or does not do, in as much as it relates to Apple. The concern is that Apple is the 10000 lb gorilla and whatever they do, good or bad, has a good chance of being copied by every other manufacturer desperate to move another 1000 units. What they will ignore is that the iPhone addicted people that have locked themselves into the Apple ecosystem can't stop themselves. Those buyers will rationalize this change (loss) because they WILL buy another iPhone by God! The other manufacturers tend to take it as a sign of customer approval that iPhone sales will continue to be strong, not as what it really is, a sign that Apple customers will take whatever they are given.

  65. Innovation is Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone 7 looks awesome, but I'm waiting for the next version, where they integrate the 3.5mm adapter into the phone to provide a seamless and magical listening experience. Now that would be innovative!

  66. Pokemon Go? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I'm seriously laughing at how Pokemon Go on the iWatch actually warranted a bullet point. The fad has already started it's downhill slide.

    1. Re:Pokemon Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was on the rise when they made the slides and booked the presenters. One more instance of Apple's failure to project the future.

  67. How about you complain when that happens? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As Apple pointed out there are already lightning earbuds that exist today. They work with all audio.

    In fact over time more and more audio feeds have been exportable from Apple devices as AirPlay support expands.

    What you are arguing about makes as much sense as saying I shouldn't go outside because I could get hit by a meteor. How about you wait until you at least see a speck in the sky first?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  68. Re:Courage? To profit. by Jahoda · · Score: 1

    God, i KNOW, right????? - all of that constant Apple hate from the Microsoft fanbois "whaaaa, I don't want to use wireless proprietary headphones" "whaaaaa, why can't I just use the standard interface for headphones which has worked successfully for 60 years". I'm glad you were here to stick up for Apple.

  69. Apple has lost me as a customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have spent some bucks on decent wired headphones because I am more interested in sound quality than going wireless. Now do I want to trust a D/A dongle made in China that costs Apple $2 but they will charge $30 to perform better than a 3.5mm jack with a internal D/A converter? I guess now you would be better off getting a lightning D/A converter for your headphones from a professional audio maker. I also think plenty of people still buy wired headphones because they are rough with them and they do not last long. Why would they spend a lot more for wireless ones that won't last any longer? Well it will make Apple wealthier I suppose.

    1. Re:Apple has lost me as a customer by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      Apple has lost an idiot as a customer? Probably not a big loss. Nobody is forcing you to buy a wireless handset and nothing is stopping you from trying out the adapter in an Apple Store to check the quality when it comes out.

      -Matt

  70. Re:Courage? To profit. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    What if you don't have Bluetooth headphones? The audio jack worked perfectly and was not broken or dysfunctional. It worked across most models of phone and other devices trivially. There is no new advantage to the consumer to the new Apple method.

    So if they removed all USB adapters from a mac book, would you say that's ok because everyone can just buy thunderbolt adapters instead or store the data in the cloud?

  71. What drawbacks?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you would be so kind as to actually, you know, say what the drawbacks are?

    The phones all ship with an adaptor. Most people use one set of headphones anyway - so they are covered.

    Meanwhile newer headphones that can draw power from the jack for things like noise cancelation without batteries are more possible.

    And the inside of the phone is simpler, with one less jack that can degrade/break/fill with lint.

    All I can see here is upsides, with zero downsides for 99% of the people using smartphones today. For hundreds of millions of people, this will be better and not inconvenience them in any way. How is this not better?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What drawbacks?? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      this will be better and not inconvenience them in any way

      Except for the lack of charging with headphones plugged in. Which you've completely left out of your rant.

      That's a serious downside for much more than 1% of users. It is virtually impossible for that condition not to become an annoying pain in the ass.

      Thankfully, the 6/6+/SE line remains available. There are no real new useful features on 7 anyway. Bokeh, seriously?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:What drawbacks?? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Well lets see, first draw back. Now I would have to carry around this adapter when I want to use my $249 bose headphones. More than likely at some point I will lose this adapter and have to shell out 50 or a 100 bucks to replace it. It is apple after all.

      I have had devices with 3.5mm jacks for going on 40 years now. I can't recall a single instance where they have been filled with lint or dust. I do remember one of them braking on a ipod but that is a different tale. And the inside of the phone isn't simpler. They added a extra speaker to the mix. Nope just as complex on the inside as ever.

      I see it just the other way. No real useful upsides for anyone and mostly downsides for 99% of the people that use smartphones.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    3. Re: What drawbacks?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious drawback, affecting a large majority of users, is that, unless you're using wireless headphones, you can't listen to music and charge at the same time. The provided headphones and the Lightning to jack adapter both occupy the only connector, so you can't insert the adaptor at the same time.

      This is a major screw-up, impacting one of the most common usage scenarios.

    4. Re:What drawbacks?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It is virtually impossible for that condition not to become an annoying pain in the ass.

      I don't see it, usually when I'm listening to music I'm not also charging. It's far from "impossible" to manage as I've been living life like that for years.

      Most of the people I see wandering around with earbuds on are not also charging...

      For those that need to charge and listen, I'm sure some solution will be available soon - or just use wireless headphones. It's not a serious downside at all.

      Thankfully, the 6/6+/SE line remains available.

      Yes, just like you can still buy floppy drives.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re: What drawbacks?? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      As someone posted on another thread, Apple will sell you an iPhone Lightning Dock for $49.

  72. Re:Courage? To profit. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    If only Apple's iOS would support a decent Bluetooth codec like AptX (note: I said decent, not excellent). AAC and SBC are pretty sub-par. And OSX and Macbooks support AptX. But iOS devices? Nope. Not there. You're stuck with old Bluetooth technology when it comes to data transmission... And high latency at that (not even the very good latency performance of AptX low latency) - but I guess if you like watching movies that all appear to be poorly dubbed kung-fu style movies (where the sound lags the picture by several hundred milliseconds), then you're set!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  73. Re:Courage? To profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is forgetting that removing the headphone jack removes the Digital to Analog audio converter for the head phone jack.

    This is the actual real improvement and reason for removing the head phone jack, removing the headphone's Digital to Analog converter from the phone. In the past they had to have a one size fits all approach to D/A conversion for the headphones. So no matter how great someone's headphones were their performance was limited by how good the D/A converter was. An engineer had to pick the D/A that was cheap enough, and good enough for everyone. By removing it, consumers can buy specialty D/A converting headphones with more resolution, or less, depending on their preference.

    The D/A converter for the built-in speakers doesn't matter because Apple knows how good the D/A converter has to be for these speakers.

  74. "little force" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's not been true of any audio jack I've ever used that just "a little force" is required to unplug it.

    The wires on most headphones would come close to breaking before the jack would unplug...

    Keep reaching!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:"little force" by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I worked in the Reliability Department of a medical device company that used a 3.5mm jack for it's main output. I've tested this stuff in a lab. No, it wasn't a lab run by the marketing department.

      I call bullshit.

  75. Why not USB? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Don't most new cars come with USB? They generally play audio over that connection... which covers charging as well.

    That's for people who don't want to use Bluetooth for audio (and I freely admit I do not like using Bluetooth).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  76. It's just a stepping stone by melted · · Score: 1

    Apple always has a plan. The next years iPhone will be super thin (since it no longer has to be thick enough to accommodate 3.5mm jack) and waterproof to N meters (since everything can now be sealed). All while providing even higher performance and more battery life. Plus you can now have active noise cancellation in your wired headphones without a separate power adapter. Watch every other manufacturer jump onto USB-C bandwagon to do the same.

  77. WTF is taptic feedback? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid /. editors ... it's HAPTIC FEEDBACK!

  78. Headphone jack vs waterproofing... BULLSHIT! by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple is claiming they did it to make the phone waterproof. Apparently, they didn't bother to spend about 12 seconds with Google searching for "ip67 headphone jack", because if they DID, they'd have found countless IP67-rated headphone jacks like this one:

    http://koumay.en.alibaba.com/p...

    For those who don't know, the "7" in "IP67" means "waterproof to a depth of 1 meter for 30 minutes". I didn't have time to search further, but I'd be shocked if there wasn't at least one company that makes IP68 ("waterproof to a depth guaranteed by manufacturer, generally 1-3 meters, for some period of time also guaranteed by the manufacturer"). Note that IP ratings for things like headphone jacks don't guarantee that the jack itself won't end up with gunk in it if you drop it into mud, only that the jack ITSELF won't allow water to pass through to the interior of the phone case.

    1. Re:Headphone jack vs waterproofing... BULLSHIT! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Apple is claiming they did it to make the phone waterproof. Apparently, they didn't bother to spend about 12 seconds with Google searching for "ip67 headphone jack", because if they DID, they'd have found countless IP67-rated headphone jacks like this one:

      I'm guessing part that's missing is "and keep it thin." That part you listed is 9.45mm x 10.0 mm. The last iPhone that could have used that jack was the 3GS. Beginning with the 4, every iPhone is less than 9.3 mm thick.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  79. Re:Courage? To profit. by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

    Sure there's an advantage. The iPhone 6 if inadvertantly spilled on with liquid would die. This one, won't. One of the reasons for that is no mini-jack socket.

  80. Fanboi Not Impressed -- AirPod's by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 2

    For $169 using the exact same shape as the normal ear buds but now wireless with a recharging case, means you are going to lose an AirPod in record time. Those suckers fall out of my ears all the damn time to the point I replaced the ear buds with something much better. Not even working out, just walking around or just sitting still and they fall out.

    I'd rather pay a bit more for German headphones than any Beats or Apple EarBud/AirPod... I don't get the popularity of Beats, they make you look like a friggin' moron. Early iPhone adopters were mugged due to the white headphones clearly indicating you had an iPhone...

    1. Re:Fanboi Not Impressed -- AirPod's by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      As much as I agree about Beats... why German? Many of the best IEM and headphone manufacturers are American, actually. Shure, Westone, Grado, V-Moda, Etymotic Research and many more besides are from there and many still manufacture there which is a rare thing. Don't get caught in the brand image of the Sennheiser and B&O of the world, they're far from all there is.

  81. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posted by CmdrTaco on Tuesday October 23, 2001
    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  82. Re:Courage? To profit. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    > . In the past they had to have a one size fits all approach to D/A conversion for the headphones

    Oh fuck off with that. You can buy lightning headphones right now, they have a built in D/A conversion. They work with existing phones that actually have a 3.5 jack as well. You can buy a lightning DAC right now. These work with existing phones that actually have a 3.5 jack as well. All they are doing is removing choice- all the options you are talking about work with older iPhones.

  83. Re:Courage? To profit. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    What if the battery in your bluetooth just croaked and the came just went into over time. No zipping out to the quicky mart to pick up $5 earbuds....

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  84. Well, hell. by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

    Here's hoping my 5S lasts three more years. I refuse to buy any phone without a 3.5mm jack.

    Are these bluetooth airPods abomination going survive a 4 hour call? The phone does, but I doubt tiny little powered buds will.

    Good thing they still make the SE (the four-inch phone). Everything else in their catalog is just bleh to me.

    Way to fuck it up, Apple!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  85. Re:Courage? To profit. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Right. The old iPhone is a piece of shit, now that there's a newer one.

    Where were you with that point last month?

  86. Way to go, Apple. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    so...yet another reason to get an Android phone instead.
    Of course there will still be the hordes of sheeple lining up for one just because its Apple.
    At this point I honestly think Apple could literally put a turd in a box and they'd still rush to buy it.

  87. Re:Courage? To profit. by lucm · · Score: 1

    If they don't replace it with a proprietary wireless product right now, how could they switch to an incompatible other wireless product that is "better" two phone generations down the road? This planned obsolescence won't appear by itself, someone has to get the ball rolling.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  88. Re:Courage? To profit. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2

    Sure there's an advantage. The iPhone 6 if inadvertantly spilled on with liquid would die. This one, won't. One of the reasons for that is no mini-jack socket

    Oh bullshit. My samsung s7 comes with a 3.5 jack and some how samsung made it spill and puddle diving resistance.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  89. Flapple. by pinzvidz · · Score: 1

    That is all I have to say.

  90. No phone jacks. Lame. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    No phone jack makes it a non-starter.

    Hopefully Android phones have the sanity to keep theirs.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  91. Zombie Jobs says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're wearing them wrong

  92. New Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be a Boon Dongle...

  93. $169 for buds? no way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I won't be paying $169 for ear buds. Even if they are wireless. Ear buds sound worse and are worse for your ears. I'd rather get a pair of closed headphones that are bluetooth or use a dongle for when I want to use cheap ear buds.

  94. Re:Courage? To profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So don't buy their headphones if they don't meet your needs? It's not like they're removing Bluetooth or something.

    What is it about Apple making accessories for their products that enrages people? Just don't buy the fucking thing.

    Slippery ropes like these resulted in 4:3 dying off, and we've been stuck with laptops that are barely above entry-level HD (720p) for nearly two decades. Matter of fact, there was a regression from 1024p down to 800 pixels in height.

    Now that I'm done with the evidence, I'll be the first to say that thanks to the stupidity seen here and already imitated by HTC, in a year or two you can expect half of the Android phones to follow suit. It's funny, really. It takes perhaps LONGER for them to do important things like catching up to a the software version of Android juuust one version behind nexus phones. So mark my words. By the time you start seeing v7 (Nougat) hit your local Android phones in 2018, it'll be at the expense of the 3.5mm jack.

    We've lost hardware keyboards, removable batteries, SD cards and small screens getting this far, and saving a penny per device while joining the trendy Apple imitation club is killing more birds with that single stone. Progress isn't what we thought it would be, now that marketing runs the show... it's not just Apple anymore. We owe thanks to the brain damage the Jobs years caused our industries.

  95. Re:Courage? To profit. by Kohath · · Score: 1

    They're always enraged about something. When Apple does stuff, people talk about it and you get to hear from them. You're not there when they bark about the green banana conspiracy at the local grocery store, or the quinoa hegemony at the hotel restaurant. You missed their rants about the weather and the Canadian president's hair. Did they mention there were weird smells at the movie theatre? Unbelievable!

    But the worst thing is definitely the headphone jack. Clearly they just want to force everyone to buy $9 adapters every week when the old ones break, or get lost, or get stolen by corporate adapter-retrieval squirrels. It's monstrous.

  96. SLR Quality? by tezbobobo · · Score: 2

    They must have a different meaning of SLR quality from me.

    The entry level Canon is an 18mp camera with interchangeable lenses. It has a significantly larger sensor that would enable a significantly different depth of field, and rang of depths. Further, you can completely manipulate the aperture, shutter and ISO. And you can export RAW for MUCH greater flexibility in editing. And you can mount it easily on tripods, dollys, etc. And by using different lengths you can manipulate the bokeh.

    Hype much?

  97. Re:Courage? To profit. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    OS X supports AptX - I can't think of any reason other than sheer stupidity that they wouldn't put it into iOS 10 as well, now that they're triumphantly leading us all to the wireless future with their "courage".

    But you're right, even AptX needs work.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  98. The real reason the headphone jack is gone: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the real reason that no one has stated is Apple Pay. They are tired of PayPal and Square readers capturing THEIR money, so take away the jack and make it very inconvenient to use those readers through the dongle.

    Sneaky bastards.

  99. Courage to Stand and Be Called - Market Deaf by marcelfilm · · Score: 1

    What makes my iPhone actually indispensable, to me, is not just the internal and net-connected functionality, but - and equally important - also the ancillary functionality achieved via the physically connectable accessories from light meter and mics, to a host of other input and output-ables. Also the re-purchase of all these tools....Gaaahr! Courage, indeed! I guess we'll have to see who will snap this up and re-purchase everything currently in use in BT version. Won't be me.