Given the abuse of every guest worker program, those are 100000+ individuals that oppose the millions of citizens passed up for work - for being a US citizen!
At best, every body shop staffing firm is having their workers stuff the ballot.
The attempts to measure "economic freedom" reward despotic countries that have low transactional friction.
Whether it is Heritage, Mercatus, or another favorite anti-American measurement du jour, they ignore any freedom that does not contribute to a economic transaction.
834.5 KB/s if sustained over a 30.5 day average month, +/- 14 KB/s.
That presumes that the device is able to: * overcome environmental issues that would affect its operation * maintain connectivity long enough to keep up with that standard * does not run into technical issues related to extended throughput via tethered devices.
That requires a lot of variables to be right (device condition, throughput, network conditions, geography, etc.) that do not always present themselves.
Without knowing the answers to those variables, Legere is lying about the 2TB figure.
The most typical reply is to justify it on the same reasoning of Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T - that it is "different" data, even if it involves the same device.
The 2TB mark is very hard to believe, since it requires an minimum sustained throughput of 834.5 KB/s for an average month of 30.5 days, to the device itself.
I sure would like to know what kind of device T-Mobile found that was delivering that absurd throughput. That sounds like a testament to the quality of the phone since it's taking unrealistic loads.
Your desire to meter harkens back to the bad old days of the 80s and 90s. Thankfully, Net Neutrality makes it infeasible since one cannot readily exempt traffic to recreate CompuServe-era conditions.
Let it die or metering will find itself at the wrong end of regulation.
There's already plenty of hostility towards business in the US whether there is reason for it or not.
Their adversarial attitude they regained in the 1980s, with respect to the workforce and other non-business entities, is the source of such hostility.
And how does one kill a business when the business has no presence in the countries where one wants to do the killing.
The US has more than a few allies that are happy to help. Case in point, Huawei - a CPC-run "company" built from stolen parts of Canada's Nortel - has a restricted presence in the US and Australia for matters of national security.
Slashdot Mirror
Given the abuse of every guest worker program, those are 100000+ individuals that oppose the millions of citizens passed up for work - for being a US citizen!
At best, every body shop staffing firm is having their workers stuff the ballot.
The main point still stands - contracting is used as a dodge to benefits or legal requirements.
Any pretense of "flexibility" is almost always in the favor of the agency and client, while the talent is viewed as a problem.
The attempts to measure "economic freedom" reward despotic countries that have low transactional friction.
Whether it is Heritage, Mercatus, or another favorite anti-American measurement du jour, they ignore any freedom that does not contribute to a economic transaction.
The reality is that they're donating 1 millions towards non-assimilating criminals and terrorists that will chain-migrate their families over.
...this kind of thing will happen. Hopefully they're competent enough to fix it.
I'd be worried more about the car itself being a Chinese knockoff and how it managed to get registered and insured for use in the United States.
At least this time, they'll have a lot harder time paying off people when the programming flings the car into an accident.
N/T
Instead of going with a designed-cheap phone, better to go with a last-generation model - as it will suffer less from corner-cutting.
It would be one of the few good cases not to "release the Kraken".
Huawei G510, Lenovo S860
The former has government experience to do it in-house (especially with their targeting of Nortel), the latter has been caught on accident.
" Anyone else read that as "why people dont like tentacular 3D"
Sounds like it'd be popular in the Japanese home market.
Yes.
834.5 KB/s if sustained over a 30.5 day average month, +/- 14 KB/s.
That presumes that the device is able to:
* overcome environmental issues that would affect its operation
* maintain connectivity long enough to keep up with that standard
* does not run into technical issues related to extended throughput via tethered devices.
He can get them, but we're supposed to take them at face value.
So data is not simply data, and magically transformed just for going on the wrong interface? Sounds like that could get some carrier in hot water.
That requires a lot of variables to be right (device condition, throughput, network conditions, geography, etc.) that do not always present themselves.
Without knowing the answers to those variables, Legere is lying about the 2TB figure.
The most typical reply is to justify it on the same reasoning of Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T - that it is "different" data, even if it involves the same device.
Hopefully Net Neutrality shoots this one down.
The 2TB mark is very hard to believe, since it requires an minimum sustained throughput of 834.5 KB/s for an average month of 30.5 days, to the device itself.
I sure would like to know what kind of device T-Mobile found that was delivering that absurd throughput. That sounds like a testament to the quality of the phone since it's taking unrealistic loads.
That presumes service exists with meaningfully different terms.
Wow, it looks like a lot of folks descended on this thread just to attack unlimited data or tethering.
Easy way to top 7GB on a phone - do a Navigon install for the US and Canada.
Your desire to meter harkens back to the bad old days of the 80s and 90s. Thankfully, Net Neutrality makes it infeasible since one cannot readily exempt traffic to recreate CompuServe-era conditions.
Let it die or metering will find itself at the wrong end of regulation.
There's already plenty of hostility towards business in the US whether there is reason for it or not.
Their adversarial attitude they regained in the 1980s, with respect to the workforce and other non-business entities, is the source of such hostility.
And how does one kill a business when the business has no presence in the countries where one wants to do the killing.
The US has more than a few allies that are happy to help. Case in point, Huawei - a CPC-run "company" built from stolen parts of Canada's Nortel - has a restricted presence in the US and Australia for matters of national security.
Today's premium products are tomorrow's commodities.
Except that the commodities are lower quality.
When they can figure out how to roll it all out on a no-cap model for the same prices, then I might be interested.