Slashdot Mirror


White House Petition To Let Foreign STEM Grads Work Longer In US Hits 100K Signatures

theodp writes: Computerworld reports that a petition urging the White House to act urgently on a court ruling that could force thousands of recent foreign STEM graduates working in the U.S. on OPT STEM extensions to leave the States early next year reached 100,000 signatures Tuesday, the threshold for an official government response. It could present a political conundrum of sorts for the Obama administration. Because the administration didn't act to protect U.S. workers at Southern California Edison and Disney, explained an attorney in the case, "now that foreign workers will be losing their jobs, how would it look if Obama went into overdrive to protect their jobs?" By the way, using a map to gauge whether support for the petition comes from all over the country (as the White House suggests), indicates that support for the OPT STEM Extension petition is largely concentrated in tech hotspots and universities, including off-the-beaten-path college towns that host large international student populations.

216 comments

  1. They will act now by Revek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since it achieves goals for their $upporters.

    1. Re:They will act now by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Foreign STEM grads can't vote in the US . . . at least legally, but that's another matter.

      Rich US donors . . . well, they can vote, but who cares? What they can do is lobby and donate lots of money to the campaign that they own.

      At any rate, Obama can just issue an Executive Administration Decree to solve the problem however he likes.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:They will act now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a tricky question really. On one hand, siphoning off the best and brightest from other countries is a boon for the US in terms of ting with the rest of the world. It is to our benefit at a national level to tilt our immigration pool towards the high end of the talent pool. The flip side of course is that since the foreign students are fish-out-of-water here with respect to understanding our culture, laws, etc they are more likely to be taken advantage of by US companies which is not good for the foreign students nor the domestic students who are competing against them for local jobs (the classic example being lowered compensation levels in terms of wages and benefits and work/life balance).

    3. Re:They will act now by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Rich US donors . . . well, they can vote, but who cares? What they can do is lobby and donate lots of money to the campaign that they own.

      They do not have to vote; they pick who gets voted on.

      And as you point out, they finance the candidates. How many do they have to support? Both of them.

  2. Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    100,000 HR employees petition government to help flood the workforce with desperate skilled labor willing to work for minimal survival wages.

    1. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100,000 HR employees petition government to help flood the workforce with desperate skilled labor willing to work for minimal survival wages.

      It's too bad we can't replace the HR employees with H1B workers. Give them a taste of their own medicine.

  3. US Citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, how many of the signers are US Citizens?

    1. Re:US Citizens? by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow -- why was such an insightful question modded down. There seems to be an organized campaign to downvote all posts raising similar questions. This is a very legitimate question. The terms of service does not seem to imply the the signer needs to be a U.S. citizen or have a right to vote in this country. That's a huge problem.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    2. Re:US Citizens? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed with sibling... how many of the petitioners are actual US citizens? After all, an Internet-based petition is open to the world, and geolocation ain't that hard to circumvent (and that's not even counting the number of H1-B's signing it from their own home, US-geolocated, IP addys).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:US Citizens? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Agreed with sibling... how many of the petitioners are actual US citizens? After all, an Internet-based petition is open to the world, and geolocation ain't that hard to circumvent (and that's not even counting the number of H1-B's signing it from their own home, US-geolocated, IP addys).

      Well, given what the summary says regarding where these petition signers connected from, it's not a stretch to think many/most are the very same foreign workers who are going to have to leave unless Obama takes action.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  4. Doesn't Matter by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you look at the responses on Whitehouse.gov then you villl see that the responses are all pretty lame and meaningless. This is when they even choose to respond. Many times they simply say they wont bother responding. The petitions simply get a response that you would expect when calling a call center in India for customer service. Nothing ever changes or happens from a petition.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    1. Re:Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who can blame them with the pathetic responses they are giving. I have seen all sorts of things on there that do not belong.

      It was an interesting idea. But was never taken seriously. So the internet reacted accordingly.

    2. Re:Doesn't Matter by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, that depends on the petition. If the petition bolsters the administration's standing/reputation/agenda, they'll happily respond. If it embarrasses or runs counter to the agenda, then it wouldn't matter if it had every US citizen signing the petition... it'll get ignored or given a form response with no action taken.

      I think this unofficial policy began approximately when the White House realized that their little petition website actually got used by the public (and wasn't just a window-dressing "oh look we'll respond to you directly here even though you sheep will never use it" type of thing.)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Doesn't Matter by wiggles · · Score: 1

      Not ordinarily an Obama defender, but....

      For every 100,000 people in the USA who sign a petition on this website, there are 318.76 Million people who did not sign it. Trying to come up with why they didn't - are they indifferent? Opposed? Ignorant? - is an exercise they need to go through for every petition with significant support. As a result, they will respond, but not necessarily take action, unless it makes sense to them, i.e. conforms to, or is at least compatible with, their agenda.

    4. Re:Doesn't Matter by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that, in effect, there's only two positions you can take on a petition: "Support" or "Not Present", and everybody does the second by default. There's no "Oppose", or even "Abstain" options.

      In a poll (of almost anything, politics included), 100k responses is *HUGE* and easily enough to make highly accurate broad claims about the surveyed population (of course, said population may have been intentionally skewed, but you're still getting a far-more-than-representative sample of it). With the petitions, though, it's as though the pollsters kept calling until they got 100k of the responses they wanted, and then threw out all the others as though they never happened.

      None of this is novel information, of course... but it does make it completely obvious that the petitions aren't actually intended to support any kind of direct democracy effort. The system isn't designed with any of the mechanisms that you'd put into any vaguely-competently-designed system attempting to achieve that.

      Now, petitions *are* a useful way to address minority concerns. The percentage of the US population that needs to sign any given petition to put it over the threshold may seem tiny, but it's a pretty substantial absolute number. If you can get that many people behind anything that *isn't* one side of one of the Big Divisive Issues that the media and partisan talking heads love to go on about, that means there are a lot of people who are feeling unrepresented on an issue.

      Not that the politicians need to give a flying fuck about the feelings of any given minority group, though... Not in a winner-take-all system, at least. They just need enough votes to get over the threshold, and fuck the rest.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    5. Re:Doesn't Matter by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Nothing ever changes or happens from a petition.

      Except when it does:
      http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  5. Crappy map by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    Who the hell would select a map view that pushes the coasts to the edges, makes the mostly empty-of-data-points great plains the biggest US section, and gives us a full frontal close-up of zero-data-point Mexico?

    1. Re:Crappy map by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Who the hell would select a map view that pushes the coasts to the edges, makes the mostly empty-of-data-points great plains the biggest US section, and gives us a full frontal close-up of zero-data-point Mexico?

      Somebody in Kingsville, TX?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Crappy map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell would select a map view that pushes the coasts to the edges...

      You want to put the coasts in the middle?

  6. Won't go anywhere by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, this isn't the same as the H-1B issue. This would actually be a better solution if we were facing a shortage of skilled workers, because more trained entry level sorts would directly address that. The problem is, the tech moguls pushing for H-1Bs don't really care about that, they just want cheaper workers. The fact that most H-1Bs are used not to bring in highly paid experts in their field, but instead to bring in contract workers for IT sweatshops, should tell you something. That, and the fact that H-1Bs are largely stuck in their one job, are part of why this solution will likely not have any tech moguls or the like pushing for it.

    I do find it disingenuous that the lawyer quoted conflates the two though. Entry level types who happen to be foreign graduates of a US university aren't going to be competing for any jobs that aren't already at risk of being given to any US-born graduates (which is a problem in Tech, but is a rather different one). That said, the Obama administration (and politicians in general) ought to be doing a lot more to crack down on the H-1B fuckery, just in general, nevermind in relation to a broader immigration overhaul.

    1. Re:Won't go anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the lawyer in question, you are missing the historical context. Microsoft proposed the regulations in question to the Secretary of DHS at a dinner party. The regulations were specifically designed to use OPT as a substitute for H-1B visas. The administrative record makes that fact crystal clear. The OPT issue is the very same as the H-1B issue: industry desire for foreign labor.

      I make a shameless plug for our new book:

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1501115944/ref=s9_psimh_gw_p14_d2_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=desktop-2&pf_rd_r=1ZJBCRQ06M6BTAH1RC5G&pf_rd_t=36701&pf_rd_p=2091268722&pf_rd_i=desktop

      In it we describe the full history of this rule and include copies of some of the documents from the record illustrating this point.

  7. Petitions are meaningless by wired_parrot · · Score: 2

    It could present a political conundrum of sorts for the Obama administration.

    How naive... they will respond as they always do with almost all these petitions - with a generic form letter statement that will provide vague reassurances that they are "looking into the issue", give no concrete plan for addressing the core demands while mostly evading the question. Anybody who thinks these petitions are worth the paper they are signed on and that the White House actually pays attention to them is deluded.

    1. Re:Petitions are meaningless by m00sh · · Score: 1

      It could present a political conundrum of sorts for the Obama administration.

      How naive... they will respond as they always do with almost all these petitions - with a generic form letter statement that will provide vague reassurances that they are "looking into the issue", give no concrete plan for addressing the core demands while mostly evading the question. Anybody who thinks these petitions are worth the paper they are signed on and that the White House actually pays attention to them is deluded.

      However, if white house responds positively, the Democrats immediately get support from the immigrant diaspora.

      With the republican being so anti-immigration, perhaps Democrats don't have to go the extra mile. Or, perhaps friendly immigration moves will capture those moderate with the strong anti-immigration vibes from the other camp.

    2. Re:Petitions are meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Democrats get a ton of credit all the time for saying the right thing but doing less than nothing about it.

    3. Re:Petitions are meaningless by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Anybody who thinks these petitions are worth the paper they are signed on and that the White House actually pays attention to them is deluded.

      I generally agree, except it absolutely did work for cell phone unlocking. https://petitions.whitehouse.g...

      The DMCA exception had even been removed by the LoC, and after the public outcry, they reinstated the exception, and went even further. Today, the FCC forces all carriers to unlock phones as soon as they are paid-for:
      * http://pipedot.org/story/2015-...

      And that change was at least partially responsible for all major carriers recently ending their post-paid contract plans with big phone subsidizes.

      That's one huge change that has apparently come out of the process.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  8. Re:Who signs petitions? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would guess that large portion (most?) of those signing the petition are, in fact, the same STEM students. No one checks your citizenship (or identity) when signing those things. I expect this to be mostly self-serving.
    Note: I have no opinion on the actual issue (I am a non-native-born US citizen fwiw)

    What you think the party that says there is no voter fraud, and routinely opposes photo ID for voters would use non citizens in this way ?

  9. Someone should ask The Donald by Jawnn · · Score: 0

    ...what he thinks of this. Better have his people brief him on what STEM stands for beforehand though. Don't want to be accused of asking "gotcha" questions...

    1. Re: Someone should ask The Donald by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, God forbid a man who has made billions, who has actually ran a company, caused things to be built, employed American citizens, etc. be asked his opinion.

    2. Re: Someone should ask The Donald by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump didn't beat the market. He's rich because he inherited it. He didn't do anything that letting it sit in a market fund all these years wouldn't have done.

    3. Re: Someone should ask The Donald by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if anyone is sorely underrepresented in Washington it's billionaires.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: Someone should ask The Donald by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      #BillionaireLivesMatter

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re: Someone should ask The Donald by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Yes, God forbid a man who has made billions, who has actually ran a company, caused things to be built, employed American citizens, etc. be asked his opinion.

      I'm sorry, were you referring to Mr. Trump here, or some other businessman who has managed to file bankruptcy repeatedly as a billionaire?

    6. Re: Someone should ask The Donald by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Do we get to vote on that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Reduce H-1s by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    If they reduce the number of H-1s, and keep the people here who were educated here, it seems like a reasonable solution.

    There's a risk that universities would open to merely subvert the immigration process, so safeguards against that should be taken. Also, why limit it to just STEM? If we train a great philosopher, America will be improved if that philosopher chooses to stay here.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Reduce H-1s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philosopher make better fries.

    2. Re:Reduce H-1s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STEM creates industry, facilitates business and wealth creation. Big business needs more bodies performing basic programming and technical tasks. Many Americans do not posses the required skills, and those that do, won't for the crap wages H1-B service indenture people accept. This is good for the business owners, as it provides an excellent vehicle to reduce their payroll. Perhaps you haven't noticed, but the western world is run by businesses controlling governments.

      As for philosophers.... -- tumble-weed --

    3. Re:Reduce H-1s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what companies want

      http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2015/08/30/4301164.htm

    4. Re:Reduce H-1s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Philosopher? I see someone has been playing too much Civilization.

    5. Re:Reduce H-1s by m00sh · · Score: 1

      If they reduce the number of H-1s, and keep the people here who were educated here, it seems like a reasonable solution. There's a risk that universities would open to merely subvert the immigration process, so safeguards against that should be taken. Also, why limit it to just STEM? If we train a great philosopher, America will be improved if that philosopher chooses to stay here.

      The problem is that the primary way to keep those educated here is to make them H1Bs. For most, there is no other way to stay afterwards.

    6. Re:Reduce H-1s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha.

      The practical benefit of studying philosophy is simple. It teaches you to think well (analytical, in-depth, logical, critical).

      If you can think, you can do anything.

    7. Re:Reduce H-1s by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      The point: ---->

      You: ----------->

      The suggestion was to make it so that the work visas currently available to graduating students don't expire (or are easier to renew, or something like that) *without* turning them into H-1Bs. Saying "the problem is that the way we can achieve Y is to do X" is pointless to the point of absurdity, when the discussion is centered on changing the rules.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    8. Re:Reduce H-1s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give you one up. Make them citizens.
      People can go to the US now with H1Bs, they can even become residents, then come back and they don't pay taxes ever again.

      Simple... Make them citizens and they will pay income taxes forever!

      Ironically the captcha: condemns

    9. Re:Reduce H-1s by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Thing is, it's a zero sum game - more foreign students mean fewer American students. That may or may not matter to you, but it's something to consider. And it's not necessarily a level playing field.

      University programs prefer foreign students because they provide more money, but public universities generally are required to admit at least some minimum percentage of local (in-state) applicants. Also, at least here in Washington they are also required to accept a certain percentage of community college transfers.

      I am aware that certain groups at our university have lobbied, for several years, to get rid of the in-state and/or community college quotas because they just don't bring in as much money. That's not the argument they make publicly, but it is the one you hear in the hallway.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Reduce H-1s by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Thing is, it's a zero sum game - more foreign students mean fewer American students.

      Yeah, that's certainly worth considering, but it's really something to consider at admissions time, not at hiring time.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. It won't matter.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... if the petition is something that the admiinistration wasn't already planning on doing all along, all that reaching the right number of signatures is going to do is force somebody at the whitehouse to have to spend time trying to explain why they won't be doing that. p. These petitions result in absolutely zero real effect... they either agree with petitions they were already intending to do anyways, or end up explaining why they won't do the things they didn't intend to do. It never actually changes their intended course of action.

  12. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh yes, it is so un-American to accept the world's tired, poor, huddled masses. It is so un-American to take advantage of the world's brain drain by taking above average workers from foreign countries. [/sarcasm]

    What does appear to be un-American is an understanding of history or the critical thinking skills necessary to realize how good of a deal this is for the US economy. So many of the world's college educated workers want to leave their home economy and improve ours instead.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  13. Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Keep thinking your jobs are lost due to H1Bs, or due to Indians being hired overseas when the company opens a branch there. You are just blind, your jobs are lost at a much higher level because American management nowadays hires foreign contractors, but this is invisible to you. Thus, you can't complain about what you can't see.

    Contractors are the easiest way to outsource, because a cheaper price is offered over a proven track record. It's as simple as that.
    I run a company overseas that gets contract work from American companies, which recently fired 1000 American employees because they would rather outsource the job to many overseas companies like mine (which are not even in India). Simple Facts:

    -American workers are simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world.
    -American education is simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world
    -America used to lead in science in technology, but the rest of the world catches up quickly

    And you know what is worse? Most other developed countries (Canada, Germany, France, Australia, New Zealand, etc) have a totally opposite immigration policy, which encourages skilled workers to migrate and help their industries grow in exchange for a better quality of life. This in turn takes away more American jobs because of competition, as those countries are less expensive and/or subsidized.

    The best you can do is to understand and accept this in the first place. You country still has an excellent quality of life, and your jobs being lost to other qualified people is not something you can avoid. Change your immigration policy so skilled workers go to the US instead, and give them more rights so employers can't abuse the H1B restrictions to make them work like cheap cattle, so at least you are not at a cost disadvantage in the playing field. You have to wake up before it's too late!

    1. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see it all the time, I also see crappy code coming back and not working. I see my boss looking the other way because you need to be down with the plan to keep your job, anyone ruffling feathers about the quality of the effort being less than was done previously is out of a job.

      I see it all, and frankly you guys suck.

    2. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      America used to lead in science in technology, but the rest of the world catches up quickly

      Is this a bad thing? Or any different from the last thousand years?

    3. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by tomhath · · Score: 1

      your jobs are lost at a much higher level because American management nowadays hires foreign contractors, but this is invisible to you. Thus, you can't complain about what you can't see.

      What makes you think it's invisible? Or that people don't complain about it? Outsourcing happens, everyone has stories about it. Many of the outsourced jobs are coming back onshore because the work wasn't getting done or because the offshore labor is no longer as cheap as it was.

    4. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1

      I see it all the time, I also see crappy code coming back and not working. I see my boss looking the other way because you need to be down with the plan to keep your job, anyone ruffling feathers about the quality of the effort being less than was done previously is out of a job.

      I see it all, and frankly you guys suck.

      That's quite an amazing generalization..

    5. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1

      No one said it was a bad thing

    6. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Most other developed countries (Canada, Germany, France, Australia, New Zealand, etc) have a totally opposite immigration policy, which encourages skilled workers to migrate and help their industries grow in exchange for a better quality of life.

      This is misleading. They encourage companies to come, not job hunters.

    7. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Three reasons why outsourcing jobs are bouncing back

      Labor is no longer as cheap,
      Shipping /transport costs are no longer as cheap,
      Quality control. It is harder to manage bad quality when the managers are 10,000 miles away from the employees.

      Automation and the above is brining back manufacturing. I see a time 30 years or so when yes cars etc are made to order instead of being shipped as that is how the cost structures are going

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best you can do is to understand and accept this in the first place.

      Or we could embargo/tariff your ass and watch you squirm as that dream of "America used to lead in science in technology, but the rest of the world catches up quickly" turns out to be a lie you tell yourself at night to justify your sociopathy.

    9. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In correct.

      American workers are simply too expensive compared to the THIRD WORLD.

      We are actually among the most productive in the first world due to the fact that we work more hours for fewer benefits, less pay and fewer days off than pretty much any other modern civilized nation.

      You are correct on education which is hard to fix when you have a group trying to make it worse.

      And American technology died due to the education issue and the fact that companies now care more about short term than long term. Too many slash-n-burn CEOs and not enough business oriented CEOs who actually think about the welfare of the company and it's employees in the long term.

    10. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      "-American workers are simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world."
      I think you mean "too expensive for my expensive taste/budget" *
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      "-American education is simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world"
      Maybe there is a reason for that? Take a look at the top 20: **
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      "-America used to lead in science in technology, but the rest of the world catches up quickly"
      http://www.realclearscience.co... ***
      Or, if you like, the locations of the big revenue technology companies:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      * The U.S. is third, and some of the countries you mentioned in other parts of your post do in fact make it into the top 10.
      ** I admit that some of these schools are private and have very high admission standards, but you should take notice that quite a few of them are State-funded universities. Besides, the State I lived in provided a free college-education. Most people I know that have student loans got them because they didn't want to work part-time while in college.
      *** This one is hard to quantify, but if you're going to make a blanket statement like you did, at least try to back it up in some fashion.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    11. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm no. I live in the EU and work at a university. I considered the US, but their miserable immigration policy made it drop of my list. Instead, I just went to other parts of the work and recently moved back to another country in the EU. Much less hassle.

    12. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1

      You pretty much backed all my points with facts, thanks :)

    13. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1

      This is misleading. They encourage companies to come, not job hunters.

      Misleading my ass: http://www.canadavisa.com/cana...
      Compare this to US immigration policy.

    14. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1

      This is not about outsourcing jobs. That's the kind of stories you hear about outsourcing cheap labor to India.
      This is about outsourcing contractors, and India is not a common target but China, Taiwan, Korea, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South America, and East Europe are the common targets.

    15. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by goruka · · Score: 1

      Again, you are thinking about outsourcing jobs (Generally India). I'm arguing about outsourcing contractors (China, Taiwan, Korea, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South America, and East Europe, etc).

    16. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep thinking your jobs are lost due to H1Bs, or due to Indians being hired overseas when the company opens a branch there. You are just blind, your jobs are lost at a much higher level because American management nowadays hires foreign contractors, but this is invisible to you. Thus, you can't complain about what you can't see.

      Yes, when we complain about jobs being lost to H1Bs or Outsourcing we ARE COMPLAINING about American management and the government allowing it.

      Contractors are the easiest way to outsource, because a cheaper price is offered over a proven track record. It's as simple as that.

      Yes, because our government allows you to compete on a level field with us, instead of properly allocating tariffs to protect native jobs.

      I run a company overseas that gets contract work from American companies, which recently fired 1000 American employees because they would rather outsource the job to many overseas companies like mine (which are not even in India). Simple Facts:

        -American workers are simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world.
        -American education is simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world
        -America used to lead in science in technology, but the rest of the world catches up quickly

      And historically when there's a cost inequality, for whatever reasons, the government steps in and imposes tariffs for the differences. It's only been in the last very few years that the American population is waking up to the disaster that "free trade" is.

      And you know what is worse? Most other developed countries (Canada, Germany, France, Australia, New Zealand, etc) have a totally opposite immigration policy, which encourages skilled workers to migrate and help their industries grow in exchange for a better quality of life. This in turn takes away more American jobs because of competition, as those countries are less expensive and/or subsidized.

        The best you can do is to understand and accept this in the first place. You country still has an excellent quality of life, and your jobs being lost to other qualified people is not something you can avoid. Change your immigration policy so skilled workers go to the US instead, and give them more rights so employers can't abuse the H1B restrictions to make them work like cheap cattle, so at least you are not at a cost disadvantage in the playing field. You have to wake up before it's too late!

      No, I'd rather elect Bernie Sanders, who would simply enact policies that make it unprofitable for your company to displace 1,000 American workers.

    17. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ass, my ass: Imma.gov.au
      compare this to US immigration policy.

    18. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't confuse written policy with what's actually practiced.

    19. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in academia. From foreign colleagues that have worked in Canada, they have universally mentioned that hiring always prioritizes Canadian nationals over foreigners, in ways that you would find strange in the US. (This is separate from work visa issues -- say the people are all legal to work there, put two people in interview, they will pick the Canadian over the foreigner. In the US, if two people are legal to work there, the company most of the time won't give a damn what nationalities are involved.)

      As someone living in France... you think the US has a monopoly on people against immigrants? You're too funny.

      Finally, I work for a place that supports 100% my visa. You would not believe the hoops I jump through to stay legal here. Apply six months in advance, and by the time it gets to the right people it's somehow late, and you owe extra taxes for filing late, and then it takes so long to get the paperwork processed that technically you aren't supposed to leave the country half the time because you have no paperwork stating that you're here legally!

    20. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-American workers are simply too expensive compared with the rest of the world."
      I think you mean "too expensive for my expensive taste/budget" *
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Per hour worked are the important words there. Americans work more hours. That does not mean they accomplish more per hour. And purchasing power means nothing in this context -- they are buying from other Americans. International trade doesn't work this way.

    21. Re:Keep chasing ghosts, Americans, wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you deluded? The only one that comes close to backing you up is the 2nd one.

  14. "Undocumented" workers out so ... by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    that some of the less educated of the 94 million adults not working can get jobs.

  15. Obama is feathering his nest, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing that he will be the least popular x president as far as speaking contracts, that leaves him a number of low paying gigs to speak at NAACP dinners.

    Obama is taking money from anywhere he can get it for the next year and a half.

  16. Justin Beiber wasn't deported with 100k signatures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no faith in these petitions after that travesty.

  17. deport 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as skilled American workers can't find work. Send 'em all home.

  18. I feel bad for the grads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... but you know what? As an American worker I think we should be doing what every other country in the world does... citizen's first. You have your sheep skin - now head back home.

    I was not in favor of NAFTA - which decimated US manufacturing.
    I was not in favor of shipping all of our electronics manufacturing overseas.
    I'm not in favor of US based companies (Adobe, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, etc. ad nausium) sending their engineering and development work overseas (no wonder their software has become so lousy)
    I'm not in favor of the Trans-Pacific agreement.

    Going along with that.. I'm not in favor of narrow-minded unions (K-12 teachers and 'tenure', requiring an IBEW brother to plug a PC into a power strip at a convention, rubber rooms, and other hyper-wasteful labor tactics). And our stupid politicians that didn't have the sense to look up and understand what tenure was originally meant for, agreeing to pension increases over pay increases, etc.

    We have the management/labor environment we have (with both sides playing tragedy of the commons) because only 35% of us go and actually vote.

    Saw a great bumper sticker... If the 99% would go vote the 1% wouldn't matter.

    FredInIT

    1. Re:I feel bad for the grads... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      If the 99% would go vote the 1% wouldn't matter.

      That would be true if the 99% doesn't vote for the ruling party. The people that do vote are hopelessly stuck in their democrat/republican roulette wheel. They did it to themselves. The only hope is to convince the non-voter who knows better than to vote for these people to pick a name and run with it. They are the *sleeping giant* that could put a swift end to the entire problem.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:I feel bad for the grads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. So you think that NAFTA decimated American manufacturing?
      Well, you would be wrong.

      NAFTA IS NOT THE PROBLEM.
      The agreement with China is the problem. CHina was required to drop their tariffs, not dump on US market and free their money. How much of that have they done? NONE.
      Trade between all 3 North American nations have gone up the way that it was expected. OTOH, trade with China has been 1 way.

    3. Re:I feel bad for the grads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 99% are not competent to govern themselves at a national level. They simply don't have the mountain of knowledge they need to make good decisions for an economy this big.

      It is true that the government they get is corrupt and abuses them. If they tried to run the government themselves, everything would fall to anarchy and chaos in one day.

    4. Re:I feel bad for the grads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the 99% would go vote the 1% wouldn't matter."

      Might work if the 1% didn't stack the candidate deck with cards in their favor before the voting even starts.

  19. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Collectively, immigrants -both legal and illegal- send tens of billions of dollars back to their respective countries every year, removing that currency from US markets. How again is that a "good deal" for the US economy? Besides, according to Pew research, North American nations are already more welcoming than European ones: http://www.pewglobal.org/2007/...

  20. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ditto, you know what else is ? Dice Holdings is now headed up by a un-american.

  21. Re:UNAMERICAN by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh yes, it is so un-American to accept the world's tired, poor, huddled masses.

    I'd be happy to support visa for these folks, but NOT H-1Bs or similar. If we need them, bring them in and give them full rights. If we don't need them that badly, we don't really need them.

    So many of the world's college educated workers want to leave their home economy and improve ours instead.

    Coming here and working at below-market rates *does* technically "improve our economy*, as the investors get to make a bit more money off of them, but not in a positive way (driving down skilled middle-class labor wages).

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  22. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What if these foreign STEM workers are somehow keeping women out of STEM? I forget which direction the progressive stack falls.

    1. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the cut of your jib. How do I subscribe to your newsletter?

  23. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zuckerberg - is that you?

  24. What jobs? Those are interns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paid jobs my ass. They want to keep their slave labor.

  25. US has other problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not an American, but got a PhD in EECS from US. I was on OPT for a few months, but left to take a job in Switzerland. Life in US is so bad, even if you extend the OPT to 3 years, it won't solve your serious problems such as lack of decent life, no social security, health insurance, etc, etc. It is just cars, and motorways and gas stations, and McDonalds everywhere. You've got the best nature, but that's about all you have. I couldn't wait to finish, and get back. I concede that you generate the best science, but sure as shit you live awfully. So after I got the education, US wasn't interesting anymore.

    1. Re:US has other problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry to see you go, you're right to a very good extent and I wish you knew more about the US I knew and still exists for the most part. Too bad the commercial interests at play here drive down the living standards here, both economically and socially. The surface you see, TV, Fast food chains, idiots bouncing around in cars texting like they can afford to... is only one level here. Sorry to say a large part, but only one level of society here.

  26. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone who has ever worked with Indian grad students knows that we are not getting anything worthwhile by letting them in.

  27. Re:Who signs petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    There is no voter fraud and the GOP has yet to provide any evidence of even a single campaign being put in jeopardy based on it. There's literally more people hit by lightning than committing voter fraud.

  28. Re:Visa-related brain drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has most of the best colleges in the world. They come for the education. They're not supposed to stay afterwards. IIRC, one of the requirements of those visas is that you go home afterwards.

  29. I've got a better idea... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why don't we reduce the number of foreign students attending our Universities and make room for, you know, Americans? I believe that a good part of the reason that so many foreign students are admitted is the huge premium on tuition that the school collects. Foreign students pay WAY more in tuition than American students do so the schools have a vested interest in having as many foreign students as possible.

    Classroom seats, like so many other things in life, is a zero sum game. For every foreign student admitted there is one American student that misses the cut. Why not take care of American students first and then, if there are any seats left, admit foreign students? Would this not address the supposed shortage of skilled STEM workers that business is always whining about?

    1. Re:I've got a better idea... by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Why don't we reduce the number of foreign students attending our Universities and make room for, you know, Americans? I believe that a good part of the reason that so many foreign students are admitted is the huge premium on tuition that the school collects. Foreign students pay WAY more in tuition than American students do so the schools have a vested interest in having as many foreign students as possible.

      Classroom seats, like so many other things in life, is a zero sum game. For every foreign student admitted there is one American student that misses the cut. Why not take care of American students first and then, if there are any seats left, admit foreign students? Would this not address the supposed shortage of skilled STEM workers that business is always whining about?

      Classroom seats are not zero sum games.

      Universities can build buildings, hire teachers and can create as many classroom seats as needed.

    2. Re:I've got a better idea... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      To make room for more foreign students you mean? You're missing the point. We don't need more seats in the classroom and more buildings. We need to take care of American students first and foremost.

    3. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, not if they fix pricing...

    4. Re:I've got a better idea... by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      Follow the money. A university makes the most money on out of state students and graduate students. Foreign students nearly always got their undergraduate degree locally before coming to the US and have a harder time switching universities. So a captive graduate student population paying the highest fees is what is focused on. Who cares about undergraduate studies, that isn't as profitable and your highest profit students already have that from a different country.

      Its simple, really. The university couldn't care less about producing American graduates or supplying the US job market. State universities are chronically short of funding and the lucrative foreign graduate student is what they want.

      Now, this doesn't mean that they cannot use the funds to build out and keep educating Americans, even undergraduates, but the incentive is simply not there. In principle you can load the undergraduate faculty with more students than the graduate -- but the reality is that graduate students do the faculty member's research. Sometimes they lose it or even outright steal it, but that is a loss for the faculty, not the university.

      In short, its all about the money and exploiting foreign graduate students. The short-sightedness of this is revealed by the increasing number of graduate students who are here for a PhD to setup a graduate program in their home country. I met a foreign faculty who brought all of this students here for that express reason: they were establishing a graduate department back home. So in the long term we will no longer be able charge exorbitant rates for educating foreigners, but who cares because the money is here now.

      Blind greed is hurtful.

    5. Re:I've got a better idea... by mrego · · Score: 1

      Sure, on paper foreign students are charged more.... but try and actually collect all of it when they don't actually pay.

    6. Re:I've got a better idea... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. The only thing I would take issue with is the assertion that Universities are chronically short of money. If that is true then it is not due of lack of funding. Universities get plenty of money. The issue is how it gets spent. I have done a lot of work for Universities and they are run like little governments. Lots of waste and inefficiency, trust me on that.

      I'm going a bit off topic here but I think that Universities spent far too much money on sports.

    7. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. Who pays tuition for all of those foreign students considering the per capita income in China and India are so low?

    8. Re:I've got a better idea... by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      I could, and perhaps should, have qualified the part about "chronically short on money". The short version is that they will always plead poverty when it comes to raises, maintenance, etc., though if it is the pet project of the chancellor, beneficiary of generous donation, or paid for by a researcher there is usually enough money.

      While I don't disagree that they spend too much money on sports and I don't have the budget of any university in front of me, I believe that the biggest problem is on administrative overhead (or graft, some universities have serious problems with that*). A university budget is very complicated and I don't think it is even possible to do what most people would consider a complete accounting. By that I mean saying that this particular dollar of funds was spent on a particular line item.

      Money comes in from tuition, grants, donations, and (for state schools at least) public funding. Money is partitioned off into different areas depending on the source. A researcher will only keep from 30% to 60% of his research money (depends a lot on the university) with the rest being taken by administration. A department that reliably supplies big money grants is not only wealthy, but also gets consideration from the university for doing so. A researcher that pulls in millions of dollars are year not only pays himself from the research dollars, but will likely be one of the highest paid faculty as thanks for the money administration gets from their cut of the research dollars.

      What happens then is that a university can have a lot of money, some faculty may be very rich, but the "wrong" departments and "wrong" faculty will be woefully poor, stuck in condemned buildings and the like. If the university decides to splurge on sports, the rest will suffer. But an influential faculty can cause a lot of waste (in some cases simply to demonstrate that he or she is important).

      * an excellent example was the university once known as Southwest Missouri State University (since renamed). They had to pay off a (chancellor, I think) because it was cheaper than allowing him to stay and continue to drain the university of funds. Naturally, being a university higher up there was no question of doing something like taking him to court for his malfeasance.

    9. Re:I've got a better idea... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      "I believe that the biggest problem is on administrative overhead " - Bingo! The same problem exists, I believe, in public schools. Not enough money in the classroom, too much money on overhead.

      "What happens then is that a university can have a lot of money, some faculty may be very rich, but the "wrong" departments and "wrong" faculty will be woefully poor, stuck in condemned buildings and the like." - Exactly. We see this in government as well. City Hall is full of marble and custom furniture. The welfare office gets the broken chairs and old computers. Again, its not how much money comes in it is how it is spent or allocated that appears to be the issue in my mind.

      I see this all the time in my own neighborhood. Every year we see proposals come up for a special tax to fund some school or other. Nobody ever asks what happened to the millions of dollars collected the last time a special tax was enacted? How effectively was it spent? How can we do better next time? What works and what doesn't?

      In other words, no follow up and no accountability.

    10. Re:I've got a better idea... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why? What makes an American student more worthy of education than a foreign one? We're all human. Why should the location of your birth privilege you or work against you? "That's just the way it is" isn't a valid answer, when you're arguing against something that is would change this situation; obviously that's not "just the way it is" because at that point, you're trying to *make* it that way.

      With that said, if you want to favor education for US citizens, how about attacking the root of the problem? If the universities prefer foreign students because they get more money for them, maybe you should fix *that*. Of course, if you eliminate the per-student margins that universities currently enjoy of foreign students, then you are, in effect, just reducing each university's budget; they might no longer have an incentive to bring in foreign students, but they have less money to teach domestic ones with, too. You could try ensuring the universities get as much money (or more) for each domestic student as they get from foreigners, but if you want to do that and also make it so that more than the wealthy students can attend university then you're talking about massive government funding of education like some horrible socialist countries, and if you suggest that maybe not every American student actually needs a college degree then you're an elitist.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    11. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Follow the money. A university makes the most money on out of state students and graduate students.

      Follow the money. Okay. Let's pull up a typical university budget, shall we?

      http://www.northwestern.edu/budget/documents/FY15%20budget%20pie%20charts1.pdf

      So, revenue from tuition (ALL tuition) is less than a third of the overall revenue? Guess they don't really give a damn about in-state versus out-of-state versus foreign tuition billing after all.

    12. Re:I've got a better idea... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      "What makes an American student more worthy of education than a foreign one? " - Everyone is "worthy" of an education. But American universities are funded by American tax payers (public ones anyway - private schools is a different matter). We built those schools so it seems to me that we should get preference when it comes to admissions.

      "If the universities prefer foreign students because they get more money for them, maybe you should fix *that*." - I agree with you completely. Universities are gaming the system by jacking up tuition 3,4,5 times what a native born student is paying. How is that fair to anyone? Does it cost 3 times as much to educate a foreign student? Of course not.

      "Of course, if you eliminate the per-student margins that universities currently enjoy of foreign students, then you are, in effect, just reducing each university's budget; they might no longer have an incentive to bring in foreign students, but they have less money to teach domestic ones with, too." - Or...they could actually have real budgets and spend the money wisely. University tuition has gone up at a rate far higher than inflation over the past 20 years. I have worked for Universities and I can tell you that the amount of waste and abuse is staggering. It continues because the funding keeps flowing in. There is no incentive to cut costs. Remember - people are in positions of leadership at universities because of their academic credentials not because of their ability to run a business. Most of these people are career academics and have never run a for profit business in their entire lives. They have no idea about profit and loss.

    13. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What makes an American student more worthy of education than a foreign one? " - Everyone is "worthy" of an education. But American universities are funded by American tax payers (public ones anyway - private schools is a different matter).

      You should look up the budget summary for your local public university for FY2015. Public funding is not that big a piece of the pie anymore.

    14. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make room for more foreign students you mean? You're missing the point.

      No, you are.

      It's no wonder SAP implemeantation's always turn into clusterfucks if they're done by dimbulbs like you.

  30. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Honestly, I can't believe some of these guys even made it through grad degrees. These tech schools that have like 90% Asian grad students should be investigated by whoever does accrediting because the guys coming out of some of these programs are fucking retarded. I've met smarter high school geeks than some of these Indian dudes with their $60k masters. Most of these wealthy Indians who come here for grad school are so used to being served by essentially slaves ($40 a month live-in servants) that they have the work ethic of a god damn garden slug.

  31. Talentless bitches and clueless libs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 99% generation whines about debt as if we should care that they made some very, very, very poor decisions. They want to roll out the guillotine; really stick it to the rich; they want theirs.

    Of course, they are completely ignorant that they are the rich.

    It's cool when they're defecating on cop cars, yeah, but give the actual poor of the world a fighting chance and they lose their shit. Because it isn't about the rich. It's about getting all you can carry with the least amount of effort involved.

    Which explains why so many Slashbitches are actually terrified of losing their jerbs to an H1B. Because they don't know their asses from an array, and aren't worth $20k a year, let alone $120k.

    1. Re:Talentless bitches and clueless libs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put myself through school 3 times, worked full time at night in a factory to do so. My family is one of the wealthiest in my very poor town, which isn't saying much. I put up with 3 hours or more of commuting a day and work nearly 24 hours a day some days. You really think that I've made poor decisions? H1-B is a horrible program to both the US worker and the foreign worker. H1B is used by companies to implement policies that are largely illegal but cannot be addressed because of the precarious situation that it puts the foreign worker in. The US worker cannot compete, because the playing field isn't level. We expect and deserve to be treated as humans, and expect and deserve to be paid for our hours worked, just as the foreign workers do, but do not receive. These aren't $120K/year jobs. They are plainly a way to lower costs for subpar work due to poor worker protections. You'd find many, many people who would prefer a system of immigration to the US instead of exfiltration of wealth to those already wealthy from exploiting workers. That's what us "Slashbitches" disagree with. Level the playing field and enforce the laws already in place for worker protections and we can talk.

    2. Re:Talentless bitches and clueless libs. by ranton · · Score: 1

      I put myself through school 3 times, worked full time at night in a factory to do so. My family is one of the wealthiest in my very poor town, which isn't saying much. I put up with 3 hours or more of commuting a day and work nearly 24 hours a day some days. You really think that I've made poor decisions?

      I have too little information to know if you have made poor decisions, but based on what you wrote I assume you have. I have no idea what putting yourself through school three times means. Does that mean a Bachelor's, PhD, and MBA/JD? Or does it mean three useless degrees, or perhaps even two failed attempts at a degree? Its too little information to go on.

      Working full time while getting a degree is also suspect. That takes a great work ethic, but even being in that position means you probably made bad choices. I had to finish my degree while working full time, but it is because I made horrible decisions as a 20 year old.

      You also seem to believe working hard is the same as being productive. This is a big problem for a lot of the middle class in this country. Most people working 70 hours per week are making poor choices, especially if its not for a company they have significant equity stake in. Work smarter, not harder.

      The US worker cannot compete, because the playing field isn't level.

      Considering STEM jobs are paid well above average for careers that require a college education, I would say US workers are competing quite well. I made almost countless mistakes in my 20's, and still have little problem making six figures in the Midwest suburbs in my 30's. I have worked with plenty of H1Bs; some horrible and some great. The horrible ones are no threat to my livelihood and the great ones only make me better when we're working together.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Talentless bitches and clueless libs. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Jeb Bush is that you....

    4. Re:Talentless bitches and clueless libs. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Do you have any actual rebuttal to eir point, or are you simply calling names? This isn't a kindergarten playground, for all that it occasionally resembles one; you need to actually respond to what somebody says if you want any respect. Be glad I'd already commented on this story so I can't moderate.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    5. Re:Talentless bitches and clueless libs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also seem to believe working hard is the same as being productive. This is a big problem for a lot of the middle class in this country. Most people working 70 hours per week are making poor choices, especially if its not for a company they have significant equity stake in. Work smarter, not harder.

      I agree

      I hit my limit, I'm going home early. And I still get a ton of raises, even though I technically am not supposed to go home early. I know my limits and I need to in order to not overwork myself and let my quality degrade.

  32. Re:Who signs petitions? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Informative

    There is no voter fraud and the GOP has yet to provide any evidence of even a single campaign being put in jeopardy based on it. There's literally more people hit by lightning than committing voter fraud.

    Let me google that for you

    https://www.google.com/search?...

  33. Re:Who signs petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not even brave enough to attach your own username with such inane invective!

  34. Re:Visa-related brain drain by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    To ... uh ... spend a metric ton of money to get a degree that I could've gotten for free at home?

    I don't know.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    BINGO.
    These STEM workers are NOT the issue. The issue is that they are hired on H1B which is virtual slavery. [HL]1B is what must be killed off, even for low-end workers

    Windbourne.

  36. Re:Visa-related brain drain by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Yup, go to the USA, learn skills from US experts, but no contributing back to the US economy for you! You have to go back to wherever you came from and contribute to their economy with the skills that you've acquired. We've just instituted this kind of stupidity in the UK too.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  37. Re:UNAMERICAN by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Never hire Brahmen (top Indian caste). They think they are too good to work.

    Lower Indian castes are smart, good workers.

    Every Brahmen at IIT had a lower caste 'helper' that did the work for him/her. Find the helper and hire them.

    Brahmen will identify themselves in interviews. All you have to do is talk about how 'upper crusty' your family is (doesn't matter if there is any truth to it). They will immediately have to top you.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  38. Keep the workers; remove the [HL]1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, the real problem is not that immigrants are here. The REAL problem is that [HL]1Bs are used to tie the worker to the company and most importantly, to a much lower wage. So, what is needed, is to remove that, and allow ppl to come here on green card instead. In addition, it should be ONLY for the top ppl, not just any STEM. By going with the top, that means that they have top grades and are paid more than the average. Anything else, is just a waste.

    Windbourne.

    1. Re:Keep the workers; remove the [HL]1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a problem that immigrants (invaders) are here? Will you say that when one of them rapes your wife, daughter, or mother? Or is having millions of shit-colored third worlders here good because of diversity and all that marxist bullshit?

  39. Re:Who signs petitions? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Let me google that for you

    The very first headline from your link:

    A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    I don't think your citation shows what you thought it was going to show.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  40. Re:Who signs petitions? by jaygridley · · Score: 1
  41. In other news, that petition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, that petition that serves the interests of 700 workers and their 89 bosses was signed by 789 people. Go figure.

  42. Re: Visa-related brain drain by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Just? Foreign students have been coming to the UK for decades. Universities would struggle without the money from foreign students.

  43. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 0, Troll

    Collectively, immigrants -both legal and illegal- send tens of billions of dollars back to their respective countries every year, removing that currency from US markets. How again is that a "good deal" for the US economy?

    Because while they may send $120 billion in remittance per year, they make trillions of dollars working in our economy. They go to US restaurants, US supermarkets, buy US real estate, and start US companies. 40% of Fortune 500 companies were founded by 1st or 2nd generation immigrants, so I'm fine with them sending a fraction of 1% of our GNP overseas each year.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  44. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1

    Wow, calling out someone for some severely racist comments is considered Flamebait around here? I didn't think Slashdot had gotten that bad.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  45. Re:Who signs petitions? by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's funny

    This is my first link

    http://dailysignal.com/2015/07...

    But hey, I can understand people that think protecting the integrity of the voting system is less important than deciding who can buy cigarettes. /sarcasm

  46. We need a petition to kill the program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would EASILY get vastly more signatures than however many signatures this initiative gets. If they want to see who screams louder, I say bring it on. Allow the voices of the opposition to be heard.

  47. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Collectively, immigrants -both legal and illegal- send tens of billions of dollars back to their respective countries every year, removing that currency from US markets. How again is that a "good deal" for the US economy?

    Because while they may send $120 billion in remittance per year, they make trillions of dollars working in our economy. They go to US restaurants, US supermarkets, buy US real estate, and start US companies. 40% of Fortune 500 companies were founded by 1st or 2nd generation immigrants, so I'm fine with them sending a fraction of 1% of our GNP overseas each year.

    Unlike those who are born here who don't shop or eat at restaurants. What you're saying is that if you live here you buy things here. Great. Let's start making them citizens instead of temporary workers. Note, a temporary worker is not an immigrant. A temporary worker has no interest in improving their host country.

    It's sad that we don't consider developing these skills in our own population. The US is a huge country and probably contains the same number of potential STEM workers that we're "taking" from the rest of the world. It just so happens that we don't really want to invest in Americans. Universities, as a whole, tend to like foreign students who pay full tuition. From kindergarten on, we consider most US students to be a burden unless you choose your parents wisely and are able to go to a private school.

  48. Re:UNAMERICAN by LifesABeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's been my experience that these STEM'd grads are smart, and decent folks. But their presence here is based on a lie. And those that stand by them support that lie.

  49. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US is a huge country and probably contains the same number of potential STEM workers that we're "taking" from the rest of the world.

    The US has about 5% of the world's population. It is laughable to think we have the same number of potential STEM workers as the rest of the world, especially given that our primary schools rate so poorly compared to other nations.

    It just so happens that we don't really want to invest in Americans.

    The US spends more per student than any other developed country in the world. (source). Private school tuition does not affect these averages much, so even our public schools are better funded than the rest of the world. We absolutely do invest in Americans, but with only 5% of the population and 22% of the world's GDP, it is impossible to keep up our current advantage without continuing the brain drain we have been doing since the world wars.

    I do agree we need massive changes to our school system, but there is even more resistance from the educational industry than there is against immigration.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  50. Re:UNAMERICAN by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    These geniuses,(their words, not mine), are so scary intelligent; what have you learned from them so far?

  51. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currency is a poor reflection of value added. Police are entirely a cost by that metric, as they do not create any products.

  52. "how would it look"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obama dont give a shit.. midterms were last year and he himself ain't running again.... a politician on the last legs of his term/reign is called a 'lame duck'... has it ever been more fitting of a term?

  53. False premise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are understand the false idea that H1-bs are above average.

    I found them to be no better than anyone else and many of them got through school by cheating.

    1. Re:False premise by ranton · · Score: 1

      You are understand the false idea that H1-bs are above average.

      I found them to be no better than anyone else and many of them got through school by cheating.

      Considering they are more likely to get a degree, start a business, and have high achieving children, I would say they are above average. Maybe not even above average compared to college educated natives, but that isn't the correct measuring stick. Even if we were only increasing the number of poorly educated college graduates, that would still rise the average education level of our country.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  54. Re:UNAMERICAN by bledri · · Score: 2

    Never hire Brahmen (top Indian caste). They think they are too good to work.

    Lower Indian castes are smart, good workers.

    Every Brahmen at IIT had a lower caste 'helper' that did the work for him/her. Find the helper and hire them.

    Brahmen will identify themselves in interviews. All you have to do is talk about how 'upper crusty' your family is (doesn't matter if there is any truth to it). They will immediately have to top you.

    This prejudice drivel gets modded "Informative?" Un-fucking-believable Slashdot. One of my best engineers is a Brahmen. Just like every other group of humans on the planet, some people are assholes. Some aren't. Fuck sake. I don't care how many asshole Brahmen's you've worked with, this is plain old confirmation bias and prejudice at work. People don't choose the fucking "caste" they are born into.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  55. Re:UNAMERICAN by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, it is so un-American to accept the world's tired, poor, huddled masses.

    I don't see that quote anywhere in the Constitution. Or are you talking about the poem that wasn't added to the Statue of Liberty until 1903?

  56. Re:Who signs petitions? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    http://dailysignal.com/2015/07... [dailysignal.com]

    That the "Daily Signal" is your first link says more about you than it does about voter fraud.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  57. Re:UNAMERICAN by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    We spend more, and get less per dollar, typical American idiocy of top down management (see Common Core) while maintaining the industrial education system in a modern information age.

    I work in education, and I see tons of wasted money being spent on people who will never recover that lost value("Special Education") while neglecting kids who actually want to succeed (exceptional). We cater to whiny parents of school brats while ignoring the good kids and parents who are there trying to dodge all the crappy raindrops in the system that is rewarding failure in the name of "fairness".

    In one example, I know of a teacher, legally required to spend one hour a day dedicated to each one of six kids with "Special needs" (one on one time). The rest of the class can suck it, as there are only 5.5 hours of instruction time. What does the teacher do? Not teach other kids? or break the law by not spending the required amount of time with each kid that "needs it".

    In my view, each kid should have equal opportunity, not equal outcome. Each kid deserves the teacher's best, not just those that "need it more". Each kid should be allowed to excel to their own capabilities. We have the technology and ability to do so. So, why aren't we?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  58. Re:Who signs petitions? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Oh why pretend the source actually matters for you.

    Anything that disagreed with your prejudices you would slander.

  59. Re:UNAMERICAN by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    This prejudice drivel gets modded "Informative?

    Who exactly are the prejudiced against? You can't say Indians, as if you read through, they say to hire the lower caste student.

    Because the Caste system offends you, you jump to conclusions. The problem is, India does in fact have a Caste system and it still is a large part of their culture. It isn't prejudice to point out what actually exists. And yes, there is exceptions to every "stereotype". But stereotypes exist for a reason, fair or not.

    So, yes, judge the individual, but don't ignore the warning signs of stereotypes for "outrage" sake.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  60. Re:Who signs petitions? by bledri · · Score: 1

    That's funny

    This is my first link

    http://dailysignal.com/2015/07...

    But hey, I can understand people that think protecting the integrity of the voting system is less important than deciding who can buy cigarettes. /sarcasm

    Because the protections are not needed but typically act as an effective barrier for the already disenfranchised. Some people think it's more important to help the disenfranchised participate than to protect against a problem that does not exist.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  61. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is definitely a problem. There are a lot kids being labeled "special needs" because they suck at reading. Anyone who works with these kids can tell they aren't dyslexic or retarded. They just skipped out on doing any reading in school and never picked up a book outside of school, and now are reading at retard levels. It's fine to help these people get up to speed and learn some reading (although I wonder how good one can really become at reading if you miss the key language acquisition period in development), but their remedial shit shouldn't come at extra expense to the students who did the work at an appropriate age.

  62. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than sorting out India's bronze age superstitions, save the trouble and hire a Chinese! You'll get a hard working modern human, not the degenerate leftovers of a poverty civilization.

  63. Re:Who signs petitions? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    ONE is too many. Period.

    I don't care if it is Diebold or illegitimate votes from dead relatives or illegal immigrants or felons or ....

    Integrity of the polls is probably the most important thing to our system in our democratic republic representative governance.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  64. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, it is so un-American to accept the world's tired, poor, huddled masses.

    I don't see that quote anywhere in the Constitution. Or are you talking about the poem that wasn't added to the Statue of Liberty until 1903?

    I don't see where I said it was in the Constitution. And that poem was a reflection of a mentality our country had before it was written; Emma Lazarus did not initiate some new immigrant movement in the US.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  65. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is most hilarious comment on Slashdot!!

    Seems like whoever wrote this is completely ignorant of the facts or wants caste reservation in the US jobs too!

  66. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My new born has a genetic condition and suffers from many seizures. It'll probably require a "Special Education" and a lots of good luck to be able to function in society at any level in the future.

    The outcome will never be equal. Technology and ability is the only reason for survival so far.

    I've paid a ton of taxes for other people/s kids, roads, and welfare. Time for society to give something back instead of just taking.

  67. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To be honest, the initial comment was "Never hire Brahmen (top Indian caste). They think they are too good to work". That is not "judging the individual", but prejudice. GP never said it was prejudice against Indians, neither did he say the caste system offends him (or her). Straw man.

    here is exceptions to every "stereotype". But stereotypes exist for a reason, fair or not.

    is just saying "prejudice is okay". GP has a point.

  68. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a company that classifies general call center workers as Engineers so they'll qualify for H1B visas. It's an utter scam.

    Tata Consulting and the Management that uses them can burn in hell.

  69. Re:UNAMERICAN by sabri · · Score: 1

    save the trouble and hire a Chinese!

    Or just save the trouble of begging USCIS for a non-immigrant petition and hire local.

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  70. If this is a problem, give me more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, life is ugly on my 10 acre hobby farm, though my horse doesn't complain. Glad I don't have howling migrants lusting for it. You should have traveled further than Silicon Valley.

  71. Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is everyone who signed this petition a US citizen? Or is this open to any nationality? How is this verified?

    It doesn't make sense for any petition to be considered by the White House unless only US citizens are signatories.

  72. Re:Who signs petitions? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    That's funny

    This is my first link

    http://dailysignal.com/2015/07...

    But hey, I can understand people that think protecting the integrity of the voting system is less important than deciding who can buy cigarettes. /sarcasm

    Because the protections are not needed but typically act as an effective barrier for the already disenfranchised. Some people think it's more important to help the disenfranchised participate than to protect against a problem that does not exist.

    300 voter fraud convictions

    http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws....

    Are you sure you know what the word exists means ?

  73. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the article that said:

    (quote)
    For post-high school programs, the United States is far outspent in public dollars. U.S. taxpayers picked up 36 cents of every dollar spent on college and vocational training programs. Families and private sources picked up the balance.

    In other OECD nations, it was roughly reversed: The public picked up 68 cents of every dollar in advanced training and private sources picked up the other 32 cents.
    (end quote)

  74. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This prejudice drivel gets modded "Informative?" Un-fucking-believable Slashdot

    Brahmin, it's just not a caste...it's a religion.

  75. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who has ever worked with Indian grad students knows that we are not getting anything worthwhile by letting them in.

    While this is a horribly racist comment,

    India is a country and culture, not a race. Twats like you would think someone is being racist if they said Irish are heavy drinkers.

  76. Re: Visa-related brain drain by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    They've been coming for ages, but mostly we'd been keeping the best ones. Now we've introduced US-style visa stupidity so after we've educated them we promptly deport them before they can contribute money to the economy. It used to be relatively easy to transition from a student visa to a work visa (to the extent that some universities got into trouble for sponsoring people for student visas, who never turned up to lectures and then applied for a work visa a bit later). Now it's very hard and often requires returning home and applying for the work visa from there.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  77. Re:Who signs petitions? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Integrity of the polls is probably the most important thing to our system in our democratic republic representative governance.

    31/1000000000 is as close to none as any human-designed system can get.

    You have a better chance of winning Powerball than being affected in any way by a fraudulent vote.

    Integrity of the polls is probably the most important thing to our system in our democratic republic representative governance.

    You're cool with billionaires buying election, but a possible 31 votes out of ONE BILLION is just beyond the pale for you.

    Don't be silly.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  78. Re:UNAMERICAN by bledri · · Score: 1

    This prejudice drivel gets modded "Informative?

    Who exactly are the prejudiced against? You can't say Indians, as if you read through, they say to hire the lower caste student.

    Because the Caste system offends you, you jump to conclusions. The problem is, India does in fact have a Caste system and it still is a large part of their culture. It isn't prejudice to point out what actually exists. And yes, there is exceptions to every "stereotype". But stereotypes exist for a reason, fair or not.

    So, yes, judge the individual, but don't ignore the warning signs of stereotypes for "outrage" sake.

    It's prejudiced against the Brahman. A Brahman is someone whose parents were Brahman. End of story. By suggesting that people should avoid Brahmans, HornWumpus is spreading prejudice. How is that hard to understand? It's no different that the SJWs that assume all men are _____. I was born male and if someone suggests that men should not be hired because they are _____, then that person is being a prejudice ass.

    I lived in India a year for work. I've worked with people from all the castes. Some are prejudice and reinforce the caste system. Not just some Brahman, some of every caste behave that way. India's culture is complex and changing quickly. You will find forward thinking people and closed minded ones. To single out the Brahman is pure prejudice. There is no excuse that makes it OK to make such a blanket statement.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  79. Re:Who signs petitions? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I didn't slander anything. I just pointed out that the source of your information speaks volumes about you.

    People can draw their own conclusions.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  80. Re:Who signs petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the original OP. 50 people a year with voter fraud. Less than that was proven. OPs statement is correct.

  81. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

    That really only removes currency from US markets temporarily. If they send USD, those float around and help keep the dollar stable and valued worldwide, or they are used to buy things from the US. If they trade them for their local currency, the bank or moneylender now has more USD, which they'll use for those same purposes as well. The more USD their (presumably less-developed) country has, the more trade can occur, which helps them (raising their standard of living) and us (currency goes back to US markets, keeps circulating).

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  82. Re:UNAMERICAN by towermac · · Score: 2

    Slick.

    Here we are talking about temporary foreign replacement workers, and you slip 1st and 2nd generation immigrants in, hoping no one would notice. Wrapping it with '40% of Fortune 500' was a nice touch, I'll give you that.

    But I noticed. They fall for that bait and switch on the CNN and Fox forums. One should know better around here.

  83. This is a fixed result. by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1

    I've been in IT for over twenty years. I have never, ever, felt there was a general consensus in favor of the aptitude, creativity, productivity, quality of workmanship from H1-B workers, F1 Visa interns, or in general 'Indian or Chinese' workers. For the SJWs, there are some really good ones, nothing is 100%. But, there's not that many to warrunt a perceivable pattern of excellence. If they were so good, or even as good as Americans, then why don't they create their own globally influential Apple/Microsoft or IBM? They seem only good enough to do what they're told, what buttons to press at the factories, to complete complex actions without a cognitive understanding of why.

    Every individual I had met who had "outsourced" software development, only did so becuase they didn't have enough money for the real programmers; like people who buy fake Rolexes, they do so for the necessity of image while attending high-brow meetings, yet can't actually fit the bill. The moment they became somewhat successful, the first to go was the outsourced contracts; but it is an uphill battle, it's difficult to become successful with sub-par production quality. Then if the company becomes public and has to start answering to shareholders, they return back to the sub-par quality of H1-Bs for the sake of reduced labor costs, because competent programmers, architects and designers are expensive. This is practical, becuase they don't need the expertise to build the infrastracture and their development cycle shifts into more of a maintenance mode; with small feature additions/enhancements being more manageable given all the rest of it.

    So, I have never met a true-blue American IT professional, face-to-face, proclaim admiration of foreign IT workers coming into the American workplace. Maybe, an "American"-in-double-quotes, a foreign national who became naturalized who strives for more of his own people in the workplace might have signed this petition, but not a real American. And, certainly not the one forced to train the foreigner to be laid off afterwards; such as has happened at Disney, which is why I refuse to purchase any more Disney products/theme park tickets/even Pixar films.

    Becuase of this, I seriously doubt that 100,000 American IT professionals signed this petition.

  84. Re:Who signs petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine how many you might find if you could actually require an ID

  85. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1

    Slick.

    Here we are talking about temporary foreign replacement workers, and you slip 1st and 2nd generation immigrants in, hoping no one would notice. Wrapping it with '40% of Fortune 500' was a nice touch, I'll give you that.

    But I noticed. They fall for that bait and switch on the CNN and Fox forums. One should know better around here.

    I have yet to meet an H1B worker who wasn't trying to get citizenship. My sample size is only about a dozen, but I have never seen these H1B immigrants who plan on coming here to work for a couple years and then leaving. This does happen quite often, but only because of how hard it is for them to get green cards.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  86. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked with people from all the castes. Some are prejudice and reinforce the caste system.

    Uhh.... if they take the bait, it tells you a lot about them. They're very likely to reinforce the caste, and be completely disruptive in any group environment. That's pretty damn useful information if you're a hiring manager.

  87. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1

    Comparing money spent on college education is far more complicated since the US government generally does not pay for college. To compare money spent on college with other OECD nations, you would have to include all government and private spending on college. From a total investment standpoint, the government paying for college is no different than private citizens paying for it; the only difference is whether the payments are direct (loans/savings) or indirect (taxes).

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  88. Re:UNAMERICAN by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

    I'd be happy to support visa for these folks, but NOT H-1Bs or similar. If we need them, bring them in and give them full rights. If we don't need them that badly, we don't really need them.

    I am not sure whether or not you truly understand the relationship between OPT and H1B. OPT (Optional Practice Training) is limited to those who are holding F1 visa and finished school in the U.S. (Associated Degree or higher) so that they can work temporary (it is now up to 29 months), and these people must work in the field they graduated from. H1B is granted to anyone who want to work in the US (up to 6 years) and have a sponsor.

    What you said here looks like that H1B is only for those who are from the outside of the country and not graduated from here, which is not true. Many of those who have given OPT would change their status from F1 to H1B. In other words, OPT is just a transition to H1B. So if you said that you do not support everyone who holds H1B, how do you distinguish those who change from OPT to H1B and other H1B holders when they all now have H1B? Please do not suggest that they should have a status or an extra flag for those who come from OPT. It could be seen as discrimination (selective group) and that would put more work on the INS. You should know what happen when the government agency has to do more work than they want to...

    Back to the topic, as I mentioned that OPT is now up to 29 months (extended from 12 months), I do not really support the idea of extension; especially when the push is from a big corporation lobbyist -- Disney. Big corporations always find a way to work around the system. If they can't, they just lobby to change the rules/laws...

  89. Re:UNAMERICAN by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Bull fucking shit and you know it. These are not immigrants, ass-hole. These are foreign workers being imported on the pre-tense that's there some shortage of American workers. Sell your shit somewhere else.

  90. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they would want to extend this illegal H1-B loophole. This way they don't even need to apply and get in the line for the H1-B, they can just bypass it easily by just getting a student visa and working at the full time American jobs.

    This drives wages to an all time low and makes it even harder to recruit more kids into these fields, because they already know that they will be low balled by someone with zero economic connection to this country.

  91. Re:UNAMERICAN by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

    And your shit continues. Recent studies have shown there isn't a shortage of workers. Keep it up ass-hole.

  92. Re:UNAMERICAN by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1, Troll

    LMOL yeah talk to Tata....listen ass-hole, there are more H1B Visa issued than green cards, which means most H1B Visas holders CANNOT become US citizens. Also, H1B Visas holders have been displacing American workers not supplementing, as they are suppose to. Corporations are bringing in cheap foreign labor, nothing more. It's a reverse out-sourcing.

  93. Re:UNAMERICAN by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    No, you are simply trolling, spewing that bullshit that "..they will still improve the overall quality of our workforce..." as if there aren't enough American workers. Hint ass-hole, there are....http://www.epi.org/publication/bp359-guestworkers-high-skill-labor-market-analysis/

  94. Re:UNAMERICAN by bledri · · Score: 1

    This prejudice drivel gets modded "Informative?" Un-fucking-believable Slashdot

    Brahmin, it's just not a caste...it's a religion.

    What's your point? The OP was referencing the caste. But even if you limit it to the religious angle it's like saying it's OK to be an anti-Semite because Judaism is a religion. More specifically it's like saying "Don't hire Protestants, they're all uppity. But those Catholics are good workers. They know their place."

    Most people are born into their religion. Some take it seriously, some don't. Some are tribal, some are not. Some convert, most don't. The only information to be gleaned from someone being Brahman is that it is 95% likely that their parents were Brahman. And yes, that's a completely made up statistic.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  95. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone that willfully calls themselves a member of the highest class in a caste system is an asshole to be avoided just as someone that says their family owns slaves should be avoided at minimum and probably imprisoned. Simple as that. Brahman == psychopath, a simple identity. Now if they deny and decry the caste system that has handed them their life on a silver platter, that would make them on par with an average human being, but still not make them decent ones.

  96. Re:UNAMERICAN by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I was born not knowing what a fucking Brahman was.

    Now I will _never_ knowingly hire one.

    I between those two events I met and 'worked' with many. They were/are 'worse than useless' air thieves.

    I have no doubt their are exceptions. I also expect they are disgusted by their fellows and never apply the label or thinking.

    They are just exactly like 'upper class' Englishmen or old money, east coast Americans. Useless!

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  97. Re:UNAMERICAN by bigpat · · Score: 1

    I think he was taking the position that H1Bs are undermining the American Job market. So really the goal is to eliminate the requirement that H1B need a sponsor at all in order to make sure that a person has job mobility and isn't a preferable candidate because of the indentured nature of the H1B program. Or at least eliminate the sponsor requirement after 30 days or something like that. And put minimum salary/income requirements that for the person to get a yearly renewal of their visa their income over the previous year has to be above the prevailing wage for that job and only applicable for jobs in the top 20% by income so they aren't just importing indentured servants.

  98. Re:UNAMERICAN by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    It is un-American to not hire American's that went to the same schools and can benefit the US economy. There are more than enough skilled US software engineers without full time jobs because American businesses are too fucking lazy to bring them up to date, or don't want to hire them as they could prove to be a good hire that might eventually want more money. This is nuts.

  99. Re:Who signs petitions? by cbhacking · · Score: 2

    Oh, bullshit. That's not even hyperbole, that's just idiocy. On the scale of "important things in our [so-called] democratic representative governance system", completely eliminating every case of voter fraud probably ranks somewhere below protecting mailmen from getting attacked by dogs while delivering the increasingly-obsolete voter information packets. Organized mass voter fraud would absolutely be a problem; I don't think anybody would ever try to argue otherwise. That's not happening, though, and "ONE case" of voter fraud has less impact on an election than three legitimate voters turned away because they don't have current forms of an ID that they don't have any other need for and that costs time (and usually money) to obtain.

    If you want to argue for the integrity of the voting system, then you damn well better make sure that your proposed solution increases the accuracy of the vote outcomes. Turning away legitimate voters counts against that accuracy, in case you hadn't figured that out.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  100. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Collectively, immigrants -both legal and illegal- send tens of billions of dollars back to their respective countries every year, removing that currency from US markets. How again is that a "good deal" for the US economy?

    1. We get the services for which we paid them. 2. They do spend a lot of their money here (even if it's not all of it). 3. helping the world economy also helps the US economy.

  101. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    A temporary worker has no interest in improving their host country.

    First of all I don't think you get to speak for all temporary workers, and secondly, many permanent workers have no interest in helping their countries either. Luckily the success of the economy does not depend on the good will of those working within it. Workers with no desire to help the countries they work in (foreign and domestic) will help those countries regardless.

    It's sad that we don't consider developing these skills in our own population.

    I think just about everyone who has thought about the subject has considered this.

    The US is a huge country and probably contains the same number of potential STEM workers that we're "taking" from the rest of the world.

    If only someone would simply consider leveraging that potential. /s

    It just so happens that we don't really want to invest in Americans. Universities, as a whole, tend to like foreign students who pay full tuition.

    Actually it is that universities like the best students they can get. They take the best foreign and domestic students they can.

    From kindergarten on, we consider most US students to be a burden unless you choose your parents wisely and are able to go to a private school.

    There are plenty of good public schools, even if they are often in affluent school districts.

    Yes we do have problems with the public school system in this country, but I disagree with your analysis of those problems.

  102. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    It's not just the corporations getting more money. It also results in lower prices for what is produced.

  103. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a son who consistently scores in the top 1% of every test he takes. He's unchallenged at school even when he's allowed to take classes 3-4 years ahead.

    Technology and ability isn't the only reason he's succeeding. We as parent actually spent time with him and made him a priority.

    I've paid (probably) a ton more taxes than you, all of which goes to other people/s kids, and welfare. Time for shits like you to suck it up and realize life ain't fair, and I don't want to pay an disproportional amount so that your kid can continue to fail. Your kid, YOU spend the time with him if you want him to fail slower.

  104. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    If we are going to be prejudiced, at least do it right and be prejudiced against any related to ITT.

  105. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Who exactly are the prejudiced against? You can't say Indians, as if you read through, they say to hire the lower caste student.

    Well to any person with satisfactory reading comprehension abilities who read this post, the answer is obviously "Brahmen (top Indian caste)".

  106. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize the totality of what it is to be American could be boiled down to what is contained in that one document.

  107. Re:UNAMERICAN by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

    There are plenty of people with good resumes. Then you bring them in for interviews, and it becomes apparent that they don't know shit. There are not enough skilled workers to meet demand (foreign + domestic).

  108. Longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work longer? 80 - 90 hours a week isn't enough?

  109. Re: UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ok cause if Fiorina gets in she'll send all the unwanted unemployed and overly expensive older Workers to Chindia

  110. Send them home! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    Send them the HELL home! There are enough foreigners taking American jobs! Ask the American IT workers at Disney how it's working out for them being FORCED to train their Foreign Indian replacements and then told "see ya loser!" by Disney! While we are at it - F* Disney too!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:Send them home! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Would you agree that the grand cause of many of our present difficulties may be traced to so many hordes of foreigners immigrating to America?

  111. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, after reading this post I feel really, really bad for the poor Brahmans.

    I mean, some of them still have to live in India. Can you imagine?

  112. Re:UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1

    Says someone who has obviously never had to hire a significant number of people*.

    * evidenced both by not know what you are talking about, and you being abrasive and immature enough to spew ad-hominem insults instead of entering in a rational debate

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  113. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth told, nerve touched.

  114. That's 100000+ traitors. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Given the abuse of every guest worker program, those are 100000+ individuals that oppose the millions of citizens passed up for work - for being a US citizen!

    At best, every body shop staffing firm is having their workers stuff the ballot.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  115. Re: ranton the UNAMERICAN by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    They're not helping US citizens, as their primary attraction is their pliancy - something desired by business but not possessed by citizens.

    They largely don't become citizens, nor do they assimilate - they hire only their own.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  116. Citizens would make more, globalist shill. by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    Compared to restricted guest workers, citizens would provide a greater value in those same roles. This would be accomplished with more tax revenue, higher domestic GDP (no remittances to siphon off), and higher labor participation rates - all possible with just US citizens.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  117. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is completely wrong. What stands out about this post is that it has remained so highly modded since it was posted. I generally don't see this combination of complete nonsense plus persistent high modding here. Is there that much animosity towards Brahmins?

    Let me tell you why it's wrong: I'm a Brahmin (yes, that's the correct spelling). Everyone in my family has had to work their entire lives, going back to my great grandparents who came from a village. You don't get any special treatment from the government, no royalty check, you don't get a stipend from a temple, unless you're an employee. No. F--king. Stipend. No support from anyone except what you get when you work LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. I've known lots of Brahmins, and they too have had to work just like everyone else. No silver f--king spoon I ever saw.

    You know what being a Brahmin is closest to outside India? The Jewish priestly class. I was describing that Brahmins were a priestly caste to a friend of mine (he inquired - not like I bring it up here - no one cares) and he asked if we had any extra temple responsibilities and mentioned the Cohanim - people with the surname Cohen - this is the Jewish priestly class. That's it, that's all a Brahmin is. I don't think non-Cohens have this kind of animosity towards Cohens. I have never ever thought about this literally in all my decades on this planet until just now. I will now have to inquire. Unbelievable.

    Seriously? What's up with the modding of this post? I could understand if there were a +1 Troll, but WTF? Seriously, where is this coming from? I'm sure there were abuses in the past, but I have never seen or heard of one, or heard any - ANY - anti-other-caste sentiment from any Brahmin I know. I'm straining my brain right now to remember and... no, not a word. Don't get me wrong, I don't come from any particularly politically-correct background, I've heard the occasional busting on other groups, but never anti-caste sentiment.

  118. Re:UNAMERICAN by alexgieg · · Score: 1

    Collectively, immigrants -both legal and illegal- send tens of billions of dollars back to their respective countries every year, removing that currency from US markets.

    Exporting newly printed dollars and such has been one of the means by which the USA has dominated the world over. It's what allows cheap products and services to reach the USA, allowing its standards of living to be so high.

    Those countries need oil. Oil is sold in US dollars. Those countries need dollars. How they get dollars? Sending products and services in exchange of electronic bits. The US gets the goods, the world gets the inflation.

    Therefore, immigrants sending dollars out of the USA does nothing of actually bad for the US economy. Rather, it's damaging for everyone else.

    Now, China is currently thinking of sending a few hundred billions, perhaps a few trillions, of US dollars back to the USA. When that happens I don't think you'll like the results...

    --
    Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  119. Re: ranton the UNAMERICAN by ranton · · Score: 1

    they hire only their own

    You don't find it a bit odd when you complain foreign workers only hire their own while arguing that we shouldn't hire foreign workers?

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  120. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's not a shortage of bodies with degrees, but there is a shortage of suitable workers. When you got people with 10 years of experience in programming but can't pass the Fizz Buzz test, all you have is an overabundance of liars.

  121. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we don't hire someone on an H-1B to do work in the US, they will do it somewhere else, and ALL of their income will go to that country. Not only does it hurt the economy, but it hurts businesses who may not be able to find skilled IT professionals in the US. The result will be more foreign startups and foreign competition against US based companies. A company that may have been started in the US will now be started in Ireland or Vietnam, and US companies in need of whatever service that company provides will go to them, and pay their employees, instead of hiring people inside the US. It's understandable that people feel threatened when they see foreign workers, but that threat will exist with or without immigration. The fact that you no longer see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist anymore. In fact, without immigration, you might soon find yourself looking outside the US for a job. That startup that could have been located in the US, but is now in Ireland instead? They might be hiring soon.

  122. Re:UNAMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great way to convince yourself of the delusion that illegal aliens contribute positively to the u.s. economy.
    Facts show that its costing us billions of dollars a year to just have these invading swarms generating heat in my nation.

    Illegal immigration is about Nationality. If you are not a legal citizen of a nation then you better be on vacation, or your have broken a law.

  123. Help Ourself by signing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please Please spare your few minutes to support following petition

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/allow-filing-i-765-ead-and-i-131-ap-upon-i-140-approval-4

    This will take only few seconds; but believe me, you will make a big impact on lives of families waiting infinitely with an approved I140