Actually it's everyone's fault. The media included.
They took a situation that was already very tense and crazy and turned it into a fucking circus. That only fanned the panic and turned into a nasty situation that just feeds itself.
No shit!
I honestly don't know of ANY 4 year old that's going to be graceful and cooperative about being taken away from a family member and groped.
Sorry, this isn't some sicko loli fantasy. This is real life with real people, and some real perspective needs to be acquired here.
Great, now they're handling infrastructure by committee.
I can see this getting expensive (and broke to fuck) quite quickly.
And dibs on how long it'll be before we see a parallel structure to the "editor cabal" problem they already have.
As someone who lost family during the Troubles and had relatives injuried by attacks as late as the 70's, while I may be an idiot, I'm not someone with no idea.
If you don't like the humor. That's fine. Not your cup of tea.
Sorry, but contrary to popular belief, it IS possible to do modern nuclear in a clean, safe way.
But the second you mention it, someone points out a 30 year old facility based on 50 year old technology where people were cutting corners and paints the issue of nuclear power with said brush.
TMI, Chernobyl and Fukushima aren't instances of "nuclear power is bad m'kay?". They're instances where improper planning, inappropriate supporting infrastructure, and plain old malfeasance compromised old, out-of-date facilities.
* within 1 light year of anything else * actually engage in any sort of nuclear reactions * use the standing nuclear infrastructure for anything * produce any waste whatsoever. It produces clean drinking water, power, and air? BAD! BAAAAAAD! * "actually" nuclear in any way, shape or form. * use any technology that doesn't have at least 50,000 years of hardcore reliability testing * offend anyone's delicate sensibilities in any way
Basically there is no such thing as a "suitable" site for these people. Because the second someone says "nuclear" their head turns off COMPLETELY (if it wasn't already off) and the first thing out of their yap-holes is "bombs" "Hiroshima" "Nagasaki", "Three Mile Island", "Chernobyl" and now "Fukashima".
As I was going to say. Malicious software is malicious software. REGARDLESS OF ATTACK VECTOR.
You can continue to rant and cry about how your precious little "lifestyle choice" isn't at fault for this.
The fact remains that Macs are vulnerable to malicious software. And the head-in-the-sand (or up-ass, depending on whom you speak to) attitude displayed by all the elitist prats in the Mac community doesn't help this.
"It's a completely different experience than what you're used to," said Matt Stegmeir, a platinum-level Delta Air Lines Inc.
No. No it isn't. Last time I flew was in 2001. The worst I had to put up with was a metal detector.
Nowadays you practically need a colonoscopy to get on a plane.
It's just further proof that this is less about keeping people "safe" than "security theater" and bilking people out of money.
This is the functional equivalent of a township that reduces the speed limit of a street from 30 mph to 15 and installs speed tables every half block. Then, a couple years later, they install a toll lane where you can drive through at the original 30 mph.
Bullshit of the highest order. And something some greedy sonofabitch needs to be shot in the face (repeatedly) over.
It isn't the media's fault the system is broken.
Actually it's everyone's fault. The media included.
They took a situation that was already very tense and crazy and turned it into a fucking circus. That only fanned the panic and turned into a nasty situation that just feeds itself.
No shit! I honestly don't know of ANY 4 year old that's going to be graceful and cooperative about being taken away from a family member and groped. Sorry, this isn't some sicko loli fantasy. This is real life with real people, and some real perspective needs to be acquired here.
Winning is one thing. COLLECTING is a whole 'nother ball of wax.
Great, now they're handling infrastructure by committee. I can see this getting expensive (and broke to fuck) quite quickly. And dibs on how long it'll be before we see a parallel structure to the "editor cabal" problem they already have.
I swear man!
If I see any bees dressed in curly wigs, lingerie, fishnets and heels, I'm SO outta here!
I refuse to be caught LIKE THIS!
Do they cover 'leet? Follow-up posting with naught but "me too"? Or do they cover burying the public in excessive copies of useless physical media?
And people falling from great heights and hitting stuff on the way down. Don't forget that.
So a slight higher-brow version of Ow My Balls?
As someone who lost family during the Troubles and had relatives injuried by attacks as late as the 70's, while I may be an idiot, I'm not someone with no idea.
If you don't like the humor. That's fine. Not your cup of tea.
What? Too soon?
You can step down to the pub for a pint (or twelve), then browse around to see if anyone's blowing up protestants using flash mobs that night.
Sorry, but contrary to popular belief, it IS possible to do modern nuclear in a clean, safe way.
But the second you mention it, someone points out a 30 year old facility based on 50 year old technology where people were cutting corners and paints the issue of nuclear power with said brush.
TMI, Chernobyl and Fukushima aren't instances of "nuclear power is bad m'kay?". They're instances where improper planning, inappropriate supporting infrastructure, and plain old malfeasance compromised old, out-of-date facilities.
Basically a "suitable" site can't be:
* within 1 light year of anything else
* actually engage in any sort of nuclear reactions
* use the standing nuclear infrastructure for anything
* produce any waste whatsoever. It produces clean drinking water, power, and air? BAD! BAAAAAAD!
* "actually" nuclear in any way, shape or form.
* use any technology that doesn't have at least 50,000 years of hardcore reliability testing
* offend anyone's delicate sensibilities in any way
Basically there is no such thing as a "suitable" site for these people. Because the second someone says "nuclear" their head turns off COMPLETELY (if it wasn't already off) and the first thing out of their yap-holes is "bombs" "Hiroshima" "Nagasaki", "Three Mile Island", "Chernobyl" and now "Fukashima".
Damn stupid signon...
As I was going to say. Malicious software is malicious software. REGARDLESS OF ATTACK VECTOR.
You can continue to rant and cry about how your precious little "lifestyle choice" isn't at fault for this.
The fact remains that Macs are vulnerable to malicious software. And the head-in-the-sand (or up-ass, depending on whom you speak to) attitude displayed by all the elitist prats in the Mac community doesn't help this.
So
Sorry but when television means jack shit to you, talking about the bundled price is meaningless.
You pay $50 for net access or you pay $75 for net access plus television which you won't be using.
Basically, adding television simply incurs an additional $25 penalty.
Wow. Ashton Kutcher. Wish I had even the energy to not give a shit about him.
Wow. Steve Jobs. Been completely apathetic to him for decades now.
The final product should put me to sleep faster than a high-grade elephant tranquilizer...
Dude, if you're cruising for a piece of guy-ass, we don't need to know about it.
Seriously.
Call me when they design a non-toy UI that scales properly at 3840x1080.
I'm selling to Europa.
All I have to say is...bull?
=)
Hey Boo Boo! I think we've fucked up.
What do you mean "we" iYogi?
Ever thought that I may have been in an airport for reasons OTHER than flying out myself?
And that in some airports, the TSA checkpoint is in plain sight of people who may not even be getting on a plane?
Or that, maybe, y'know, my eyes work and I might be inclined to observe the goings-on?
Nah!
Couldn't happen!
"It's a completely different experience than what you're used to," said Matt Stegmeir, a platinum-level Delta Air Lines Inc.
No. No it isn't. Last time I flew was in 2001. The worst I had to put up with was a metal detector.
Nowadays you practically need a colonoscopy to get on a plane.
It's just further proof that this is less about keeping people "safe" than "security theater" and bilking people out of money.
This is the functional equivalent of a township that reduces the speed limit of a street from 30 mph to 15 and installs speed tables every half block.
Then, a couple years later, they install a toll lane where you can drive through at the original 30 mph.
Bullshit of the highest order. And something some greedy sonofabitch needs to be shot in the face (repeatedly) over.
So do they live in sewers and learn ninjitsu from rats?
Oh wait. Wrong amphibians...
If it was good enough for Edison, it's good enough for me!
I'm just shocked that it was only 56%.
I'd have thought a greater portion of the Swiss constituency would have better sense than this.