Slashdot Mirror


US Judge Say Kim Dotcom May Never Be Tried or Extradited

vik writes "As Megaupload's Kim Dotcom's megafarce trial continues, the New Zealand Herald reports that his alleged offense not only falls below the threshold for extradition, but also that the warrant may not be properly served. 'My understanding as to why they haven't done that is because they can't. We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States,' says Megaupload's lawyer Ira Rothken. Not surprisingly, Kim Dotcom has a few choice words to say about having his business trashed this way, with 220 jobs lost, and millions left without access to their legitimate data."

345 comments

  1. Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was put out of business and lost tens of millions of dollars from the raid. His punishment has already been served, without trial, and without due process.

    1. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BenJCarter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember who was in charge when this happened and vote accordingly next election.

      --
      For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
    2. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet he still has the right to sue for damages. THAT should be a interesting trial.

    3. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. The *AA and their government goons have never cared about process. Same when you get arrested under false pretenses, the establishment gets off with a 'sorry' while in the mean time you lost your job, lost relationships and regardless of conviction you have a record that keeps influencing whether or not you'll get hired in the future and whether or not you keep getting re-arrested and strip searched for simply existing.

      These days, the legal system simply has so much cruft, overbearing laws and process hindrances that simply the threat of getting arrested is enough to make you think about complying with whatever they want, getting arrested will give you perpetual problems in your life and getting convicted even if overturned later will make you an outcast.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Global capital? How do we vote them out of office?

    5. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by bubkus_jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, because it's ALL his fault, right? The previous guy didn't do ANYTHING wrong and was a perfect saint, a champion of personal freedoms and rights. Voting the other guy isn't going to help, as they end up serving the same masters. You want change, you need to neutralize the power of those masters, and find a way to convince people to vote for someone who won't simply bow to them.

      Good luck with that.

    6. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 4, Informative

      The previous guy didn't do ANYTHING wrong and was a perfect saint

      Actually, he didn't mention anything about the previous guy...

    7. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Shajenko42 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. The *AA and their government goons have never cared about process. Same when you get arrested under false pretenses, the establishment gets off with a 'sorry' while in the mean time you lost your job, lost relationships and regardless of conviction you have a record that keeps influencing whether or not you'll get hired in the future and whether or not you keep getting re-arrested and strip searched for simply existing.

      I vehemently disagree!

      They almost never say "sorry".

    8. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Completely cut off the flow of money to the entertainment industry and encourage others to do the same.

      Whether you pirate or abstain is irrelevant. What matters is that the flow of money stops.

      The behemoth entertainment industry was not created out of thin air by Blofeld. It grew from the ground up when clueless consumers chose to buy its products, unaware or unconcerned with what their purchases were fueling.

      The entertainment industry did not fall from the sky. The public created it, nurtured it, and fed it. It is what it is because people are willing to fork over huge sums of money for an intangible product of questionable quality with a near zero marginal cost of production.

      These days, telling someone to give up their MAFIAA-backed entertainment is like trying to get a smoker to quit. People are hooked and falsely believe that mass produced entertainment is a necessity. In the brain of the average consumer, not buying a DVD and taking a hike in the park instead does not even register as an option.

    9. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Are you serious? I get the impression that you believe a Republican would have done better, or more fairly? There really is a "kinder, gentler" way of trashing people's business, I imagine.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by KorrodeAU · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I'm looking forward to that headline: "U.S. Government sued for damages by MegaUpload, including future loss of business. Total claimed amount is counted in billions.".

    11. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by cpghost · · Score: 1

      His punishment has already been served, without trial and without due process.

      But... but... without the trillions dollars of statutory damages from copyright infringement, the Entertainment Cartel will certainly go bankrupt. Would anybody please think of the MAFIAA executives' children?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    12. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by _KiTA_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Global capital? How do we vote them out of office?

      Traditionally, With Torches and Pitchforks.

    13. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice but the fact is not all content provider MAFIAA are just content providers...

      SONY: Hardware - TVs, Radios, Game Consoles, DVD Players, CD Players, etc...

      as well many other have investments to keep them going... it sucks but the real way to handle things would be a general boycott of consumerism entirely but that would also hurt the economy in the process... tough choices.

    14. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It this meant to be funny? Because if not, it has to be the most clueless post of the day.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by morari · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People still buy Sony products? What worthy product have they even produced in the last two decades?

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    16. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by shoehornjob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a good point. As I recall he is responsible for putting at least 5 MAFIAA lawyers in the department of (un) justice. I wouldn't judge him on his choice of lawyers though. I'm sure Mitt would do the same thing. The problem here is that the government works for corporate interests and not the people. It would be nice to see a nice big fat juicy lawsuit (can you say class action) come out of this. Someone needs to put these asshole Mafiaa lawyers in their place.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    17. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by micheas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why we Americans have the second amendment.

      "A revolution every twenty years is good for a country." Thomas Jefferson

      The house of representatives was supposed to be about as difficult an office to obtain as city council seats.

    18. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which was the whole point.

      By putting all the attention on the current guy, you ignore the fact that the previous guy laid the groundwork in the first place.

    19. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 1

      But that wasn't the whole point. He said it as if he was saying that the guy he replied to was claiming that the previous guy did no wrong. He didn't.

    20. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by lordmetroid · · Score: 2

      In times like these, it is important to ask. For what do you want the economy? Is the continued perpetuance and growth of the economy the goal? I do not see it as such, I believe the goal of the economy is to provide a better life for people and in order to do that any part of the economy that is rotten, absurd and wicked should be cut off and left to wither.

      Now when we have everything we could wish for, perhaps it is time to reconsider what could make ones life better, could it perhaps be more materialistic wealth or could it perhaps be more time to enjoy the company of ones peer, to socialize and to enjoy art and culture? Perhaps it is shorter workdays, shorter workweek.

    21. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say hello to a billion dollar lawsuit from Dotcom - that he will win...

    22. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by stms · · Score: 4, Informative

      I posted this here the other day but it seems very appropriate to post again. Bookmark this link List of SOPA/PIPA Supporters.

    23. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Global capital? How do we vote them out of office?

      First, I read your comment.

      Then, I laughed out loud.

      Then, I sighed.

      Then, I cried.

      Now I feel like shit.

      Thanks :-((

    24. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Chas · · Score: 1

      Winning is one thing. COLLECTING is a whole 'nother ball of wax.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    25. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by houghi · · Score: 1

      Hint. It isn't this, nor the other party.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    26. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      What worthy product have they even produced in the last two decades?

      Heh, You kids.. must think that TV grows on trees

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    27. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You think Mitt Romney (or any of the Republican candidates) would be any better? Your politcal system is fucked up at the moment. I know you didn't say vote Republican, but the implication was that anyone but Obama was a good choice, when it isn't. Maybe if you vote for a third party and enough other people do it it will register on their radar and influence their policies.

    28. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The original PlayStation was a nice console to program for, once Sony relented and told the developers how the hardware worked.

    29. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll kick their asses in court if (assuming his lawers don't suck) they never charge him under the statutes they claimed he was violating when killing his businesses.

    30. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welcome to the new 'justice' system. Isn't it grand?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    31. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by acidrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He was put out of business and lost tens of millions of dollars from the raid. His punishment has already been served, without trial, and without due process.

      Except this whole thing was orchestrated to prove to legislators that the current law cannot be used to stop the bad guys and that America needs those tougher laws that the lobbyists cannot get though.

      "Ok, they won't give us the powers we need to make it impossible to send movies to your friends... How about we try and do everything possible we can to take down someone we can paint as the bad guy (fat douche looking hacker with an attitude, nice!) and when it backfires we can say it isn't cause we are not trying hard enough. It is because we need bigger legal guns."

      Kim will get his stuff back. He will put Megaupload back online, even without everyone's data, because Kim will want to make a point, and the point will be exactly the point the RIAA and MPAA want him to make. "Look we even had the bad guys raided by a swat team... And they went right back to selling bandwidth to pirates."

      --
      -- http://thegirlorthecar.com funny dating game for guys
    32. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by DaneM · · Score: 1

      He was put out of business and lost tens of millions of dollars from the raid. His punishment has already been served, without trial, and without due process.

      This pretty aptly sums up the whole situation. Please continue to mod-up parent.

    33. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by fleebait · · Score: 1

      Sony products? What worthy product have they even produced in the last two decades?

      Trinitron Picture tubes?

    34. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But that wasn't the whole point. He said it as if he was saying that the guy he replied to was claiming that the previous guy did no wrong. He didn't.

      What does it matter to what's occurring NOW, what some previous guy did or didn't do?

      If the previous guy had burned 10,000,000 live babies to death, does that mean the current guy is OK because he only burned 9,999,999 live babies to death?

      Shouldn't we instead be outraged at the whole idea of either guy burning live babies to death?

      This is the kind of partisan insanity that keeps those types of leaders in power decade after decade.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    35. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess if I rented an apartment and found the previous owners stock piled armaments then it's not entirely my fault for shooting people.

    36. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      Why? So US Tax Payers can pay for something that was entirely pushed into motion by large media corporations?

    37. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember who was in charge when this happened and vote accordingly next election.

      Right, because a Republican would never have stood up for large corporations and taken down Megaupload.

    38. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That wouldn't matter either and here is why: If you change whatever official is in there the global PTB will simply throw a few bribes to the right ones and take what you have by force, so even voting with your dollars is no longer relevant, see "Too big to fail" as an example.

      Frankly the only real course of action left is to grab as much as you can for you and yours and wait for the whole rotten structure to collapse. As both sides continue to spend like drunken sailors the collapse is inevitable now, the only question is how long it will take and what will come after. Will it be fascism, communism, el presidente style dictatorships? Who knows but its pretty obvious that at this point the global elite have concentrated too much wealth for the peoples of any nation to stand up to them, all one can do is protect one's own as much as you can and wait for the whole rotten thing to burn.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    39. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I'm looking forward to that headline: "U.S. Government sued for damages by MegaUpload, including future loss of business. Total claimed amount is counted in billions.".

      Two words:

      Sovereign Immunity.

      "We don't think we'll allow you to sue us today. We've ordered the judge to drop all proceedings and dismiss the suit with prejudice. You may not refile."

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    40. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Cwix · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep, they were the muscle. They should have known better.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    41. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but he did imply that voting out Obama would make a difference. It won't.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    42. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by mpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember who was in charge when this happened and vote accordingly next election.

      Do the RIAA and MPAA even have elections?
      Plenty of those affected will have no right to vote in either the USA or New Zealand in any case.

    43. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by green1 · · Score: 1

      against who though? the media industry will just point to law enforcment, saying they had no control over it, all they did was tip off law enforcement to the activity, any "mistake" in due process would be law enforcment's problem, similarly law enforcment will find some low level middle management type and throw them under the bus. They'll get some time off (with pay) and everything will go back to normal.

    44. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      I doubt if would even get that far. Turns out that NZ and the US aren't just in bed with each other, the US has NZ gimped out.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    45. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by shiftless · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Vote RON PAUL, that's how.

    46. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will if no candidate that does not do right by the public ever gets a second term.
      No Mayor, Councilman, Senator, Rep, President or fucking school board member ever gets re elected once they breach public trust.

      We are getting the representation we deserve. We continue to vote them back.
      Fuck the politicians. A career as a politician should be illegal.
      Punishable by death.

    47. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If this goes as badly as I think it will, the media industry's fangs will be pulled out. They will no longer get to use the US DOJ as their sockpuppet.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    48. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt if would even get that far. Turns out that NZ and the US aren't just in bed with each other, the US has NZ gimped out. [wikipedia.org]

      Good point.

      These days, it seems being a US ally is more damaging than being a hostile nation. Look at how the US has all but cut the legs out from under Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, and the only one that doesn't kill gays/lesbians, doesn't treat women as chattel, and allows Muslim Arabs to be citizens and enjoy full citizenship privileges. Compare that to how the Muslim Arab nations treat Christians, Jews, and women within their own borders. For that matter, look at how the Arab nations refused and still refuse to allow Palestinian refugees into their countries in favor of using them and their suffering as a cat's paw to attack Israel and the US.

      The antisemitism on open display in the US and elsewhere by groups like OWS scares the piss out of me. Does nobody remember or has anyone not been taught about WW2 and the Holocaust? Just as then, Jews are now increasingly being blamed for all the ills caused by the political leaders of their own political parties & nations.

      This way leads to genocide and other horrors on a mass scale, and not just to Jews, either. Remember that the concentration camps were not exclusively for Jews, but for any "defective" people like gays, the mentally challenged, the physically "deformed", and anyone that opposed the regime, or were simply "inconvenient" in some way.

      History doesn't always exactly repeat itself, but historical patterns sure do. Hold on tight, because it's going to get really nasty for everyone, and sooner than you think.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    49. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of the remaining political figureheads are approved by the Them. So the Us has already lost the election.

      Remember what good ol' Uncle Joe said, "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything."

      Being from a less complex political environment, he didn't even begin to consider those who decide what names are on the ballots, which is one of the many reasons why his state isn't around any more.

    50. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only his punishment, but look at how all the other file sharing sites changed their policies overnight, not under court order, but voluntarily out of terror of being the next victim. This I believe was the intended outcome, and all without even needing to go to court...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    51. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by symbolset · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember that if you buy both sides it doesn't matter who wins.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    52. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Hatta · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't judge him on his choice of lawyers though. I'm sure Mitt would do the same thing.

      This is your mistake. You should judge both Obama and Mitt for a poor choice of lawyers. Both parties favor regulatory capture, judge them both harshly for it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    53. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, their EBOOK READER PRS-505 and the newer touchscreen ones are *very* decent. And don't give me the "Trust Kindle not to erase again" or "more books are in Kindle format"

    54. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna hold responsible all the people who took money from the riaa/mpaa to be their little bitch legal shills.

      Which at last count was pretty much everyone.

    55. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2

      As long as US taxpayers continue to elect people based on soundbites, wavy hair and perfect teeth, then yes, you reap what you sow.

      That's the part people keep forgetting about living in a democracy. Not only do you have the power to elect the government, you also bear responsibility for the actions of said government.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    56. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by nut · · Score: 1

      Actually it's the Crown Law Office in NZ that is first in line to be sued. It is the entity that took action against him. And that would be a criminal case (unlawful arrest and seizure of property) although parties in the US might be liable for civil damages.

        Of course IANAL.

      --
      Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    57. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who do vote in New Zealand have no impact on things, anyway. Our prime minister smiles, and people think everything's alright. He's in a lot of photos, and he's always smiling, so things must be fine, right?

      But he's always willing to do what needs to be done, that much is true. What "needs to be done" varies a lot, though - lower wages? Done! Worse bargaining positions for the waged? Done! Lower taxes for the rich, higher sales tax for everyone? Done! implementing laws as presented by the US government on behalf of big business? Done!

      No, this is all across the world. Very few are even bothering to hide now. They pay lip service to what they're meant to, and the rest of us can just support them in the name of democracy!

    58. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by sjames · · Score: 2

      And that's why the people need to send the message that the problem is a DOJ that can't find it's collective ass with both hands and a map attacking innocent people at the request of coke sniffing crooks in Hollywood.

      Just one good drug raid on a Hollywood party would probably bag more evidence than the perfectly legal marijuana dispensaries they keep harassing.

    59. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Excellent impression of a Zionist troll. Most of the world has been sick and tired of Israel's bullshit for some time now, with only the U.S. government (and it's Security Council veto pen) keeping it's ass out of the fire.

      Real nice. Your family must be SO proud.

      I don't typically respond to such hate-filled bigoted trolls like yourself, but I see your kind of ignorance, intolerance, & hatred too much these days to allow it to pass without a well-deserved smack-down.

      So tell me Mr. Anonymous Coward, why don't you put a username behind your post in favor of treating women like chattel, killing gays, and establishing an Islamic theocracy to rule the world?

      Could it be that you ARE a bigoted, ignorant, intolerant, narrow-minded, hate-filled coward? Yes, you most certainly are, and you just proved it to the world.

      The apartheid regime in South Africa was finally ended. May the same happen in Israel, the sooner the better.

      BTW, since Muslims and other Arabs live and work and raise their children peacefully among the Jews in Israel with equal rights, something the other Arab countries refused and still refuse to do for Palestinians, what "apartheid" do you mean?

      The one hate-filled bigots like yourself would like to wage against Israel and Jews...that is, IF you had the balls to fight them like something other than a cowardly bigot?

      Yeah, that's what I thought. GTFO and let civilized people have an intelligent discussion, troll.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    60. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by hemo_jr · · Score: 1

      The MAFIAA figures they own the administration, that they got the President elected and own him fair and square. Nor has the administration done much to disabuse them of this. Federal judges have been appointed from the ranks of the MAFIAA lobbyist lawyers. A copyright czar is there in the DoJ, whose only job is to go organize take downs like Megaupload's. ACTA was negotiated in secret (the secrecy protected by claims of national security). Then ACTA was signed and the decision was made not to send it to the Senate for ratification (or more probably rejection) but still put into force. The State Department has pressured SOPA like laws on Spain, Ireland and other countries The US placed Canada on its Special 301 watch list over intellectual property rights enforcement. In effect, the US government has been acting as the enforcement arm of the content cartel.

      The previous Republican administration started and did a lot of this crap too. But the line needs to be drawn somewhere and sometime. It might as well be drawn now. And it might as well be drawn between the MAFIAA and the administration of the US.

    61. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to make it about Israel. Your personal bias is showing.

    62. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony's cameras are awesome before the factory was wiped out in a tsunami. It's just a pity that this was the only part of their empire that didn't suck.

    63. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the office of president is so meaningless, why do we have it?

      (that's sarcasm)

    64. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, people mostly forget that the lesser of two evils is still evil.

      Lemme repeat myself for those that missed it the first time. The lesser of two evils is still evil

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    65. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      You, sir, have just won the thread.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    66. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      You can't sue the Federal government unless they give you permission to sue. IIRC, that comes from the Justice Department. You really think the Justice Department is going to give you that permission? And no, you can't even sue the 'footsoldiers' in this one, they were acting in a 'lawful capacity' and did not exceed their (currently) lawful authority.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    67. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      You know, Israel deserves some upbraiding. 20 years ago I would have argued that Israel was interested in peace. They actually tried to make peace and were spurned and that have been fighting for their survival since against hostile parties in the Arab states. And I get that now 60 years later the Arabs are finally making offers now that they (Arabs) realized they can't accomplish by force so they are trying to work the other side and that the hypocrisy of doing so while funding and supporting terrorism works against Israeli desires for peace. But that interest in peace has LONG since faded for other reasons entirely.

      Between seizing Palestinian land without payment, and I'm not even talking about the illegal land seizures of refugees that fled the fighting (yes I know the Arab governments encouraged it so they could wage indiscriminate war against the Israeli's) but you can't ignore the fact that there is a natural human desire to flee fighting to keep your families alive. No what I'm talking about is the Israeli government not only condoning but supporting the terrorist actions of the militant settlers direct seizure of Palestinian lands, which I might add is against Israeli law yet they still bring in soldiers to protect the enclaves and provide power and water and other modern needs and even help them build the structures. These enclaves rob the livelihoods of the Palestinian land owners, for no other reason than to stake a claim to land they don't even own.

      But the best part is that these same militant settlers will enact a "price tag" when any little thing doesn't go exactly the way they want, this includes burning down homes, destroying property, beating up innocent Palestinians (including old people and children) and torching Christian churches all while defended by the IDF so they don't have to worry about someone punching the bully back. Does anything happen to them? No, the government does nothing about the terrorism and in fact condones the actions by further supporting additional seizures and defending new enclaves. For example, one of the most recent where the Israeli government had the gall to claim the brand new settlement was a suburb when in fact it was more than a mile away, on a hilltop across a valley (with a Palestinian city in the valley).

      No the Israeli's don't want peace anymore, they get everything they want now by treating Palestinians worse than livestock. If there was a genuine Palestinian state the Israelis wouldn't be able to just bully, abuse and intimidate the Palestinian people, they would have to deal with a Sovereign nation state with genuine rights and protections enshrined in international law. They wouldn't be able to steal the land and water of the Palestinians and take their livelihoods and rob them of their human rights. Israel gave up on peace before Sharon was elected. So the Israelis talk about the hypocrisy and killing of Israelis by the Palestinians and how the Palestinians don't want an Israeli state, but at the same time ignore that they most certainly don't want a Palestinian sovereign state. Just like the Arabs use the conflict to placate their own people the Israelis are doing the same damn thing.

      The worst thing to do in this world would be to give Israel a free hand to continue to commit the crimes they have been allowing to happen. I don't think the Palestinians hands are clean nor do I think the Genie is going back in the bottle and Israel is going to be removed or that the Arab population sh/would be allowed back in. But the Israelis have long since stopped being a solution to the problem and are major part of the problem now. Either they need to just decide they aren't ever going to make peace, seize all the Palestinian lands and commit the holocaust they've been slowly working up to or they need to make the decision to go for peace and return to reasonable historic borders.

      But either way, the complicit action of the US government in supporting the Israeli terrorism while condemning the reverse side needs to stop, if for no other

    68. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by spauldo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not the AC, but I'll respond anyway.

      The AC never said anything hate-filled. He never said anything bigoted. He never said anything that bore the marks for ignorance, intolerance, or hatred. You said all that.

      You're the one that seems to think antisemitism is the norm in the U.S. You're the one thinking jews are blamed for all the ills of the nation (silly me, I thought it was the Democrats, or the Republicans, or the financial industry, or etc. etc. etc.). You're the one who thinks we're only one step away from setting up concentration camps.

      In other words, you're the one who's acting like a Zionist troll.

      You seem to equate disliking Israel's policies with being a hate-filled bigoted troll. Well, I'm not hate-filled, bigoted, nor a troll, and I don't care for Israel's policies. Sure, they got the whole democracy thing down, which is good, and they have a decent record for civil rights as far as those they consider citizens (i.e. not palestinians), but hey - so does the U.S., and I don't like a lot of our policies either.

      What we're sick of is the neverending "peace process" which is basically just Israel spinning its wheels and doing nothing about the status quo. You might like the status quo, but palestinians do not. You blame arab nations for not allowing palestinian refugees into their countries, but you hold blameless the country responsible for making them refugees in the first place. Israel can't even keep basic promises, like not building settlements in the West Bank. Israel shows no interest in the welfare of the palestinians.

      That's what he meant by apartheid. If you can't see parallels there, you're blind.

      Now, you're just going to say I'm just another troll (I'm not), and that I'm an antisemite (I'm not), and that I want a war against Israel (I don't), because you've got a chip on your shoulder the size of Syria. That's fine, I don't care. I'd like to think, though, that maybe, just maybe, you'd engage your brain and realize that just because some people don't suck off the "chosen of God" doesn't mean we want to slaughter them wholesale.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    69. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because it's ALL his fault, right? The previous guy didn't do ANYTHING wrong and was a perfect saint, a champion of personal freedoms and rights. Voting the other guy isn't going to help, as they end up serving the same masters. You want change, you need to neutralize the power of those masters, and find a way to convince people to vote for someone who won't simply bow to them.

      Well, at least for the immediate future....just keep voting out the incumbents that are not working for us....maybe eventually we'll get someone in there who'll be for the people again.

      Not just the president....but congress...vote out all incumbents, regardless of party.

      But current administration has failed us on so many issues, and broken SO many promises....they definitely need to be top of the list to go. I can't think of anyone right now that would be much worse, especially if current admin got 4 more years with NO fear of re-election.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    70. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      No, but he did imply that voting out Obama would make a difference. It won't.

      Well, what do you want to do...keep someone in that has completely blown it, and with 4 more years of no worries of re-election won't be hampered at all....

      I mean, at this point, I'd vote a small soap dish in over the current administration.

      About the only thing we can do....is see what has failed, and give the next one a try...

      YOu know the old definition of Insanity, eh?

      Doing the same thing over and over....and expecting a different result.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    71. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      As long as US taxpayers continue to elect people based on soundbites, afro hair and perfect teeth, then yes, you reap what you sow.

      There, FTFY.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    72. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent impression of a Zionist troll. Most of the world has been sick and tired of Israel's bullshit for some time now, with only the U.S. government (and it's Security Council veto pen) keeping it's ass out of the fire.

      Real nice. Your family must be SO proud.

      I don't typically respond to such hate-filled bigoted trolls like yourself, but I see your kind of ignorance, intolerance, & hatred too much these days to allow it to pass without a well-deserved smack-down.

      So tell me Mr. Anonymous Coward, why don't you put a username behind your post in favor of treating women like chattel, killing gays, and establishing an Islamic theocracy to rule the world?

      Could it be that you ARE a bigoted, ignorant, intolerant, narrow-minded, hate-filled coward? Yes, you most certainly are, and you just proved it to the world.

      I guess he touched a nerve, huh? Overreaction much? I notice you didn't even address the point he made either, just pounded on the table and screamed about racism.

      If you honestly believe that Israel is a bastion of all that is good and right with the world then you have extremely low standards, or you're an actual resident and are blinded by standard nationalism.

      Israel may be nice to live in, I wouldn't know, I do know that Israel has been slowly stealing land from Gaza and Palestine with it's "settlement program" and that objections to such are met with white-phosphor explosives dropped on civilians. That looks like a deliberate attempt to exterminate people they don't like and then claim an accident rather than massacre, I can only suppose they felt they wouldn't get away with Chlorine or Mustard Gas. You don't get to ride the high-horse whilst being face down in the mud.

    73. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we do this they blame piracy and destroy businesses in order to recoup their costs.

    74. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because what's occurring now is a direct result from the influence of the guy from BEFORE. The fact that Obama is too much of a coward to stop it and bows to all these pressures doesn't discount the fact that the Bush d-bags put this shit into motion.

    75. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      All may be true, and there may be loads of issues...

      and millions left without access to their legitimate data."

      But the summary doesnt need to go overboard and paint Kim as some innocent dude who was trying to get legitimate users their legitimate data.

      Not trying to justify things, but I think we can leave it at "the raid was out of line (or illegal) but Kim remains a parasite."

    76. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      Between seizing Palestinian land without payment,...

      I'll just leave this here for you.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7ByJb7QQ9U

      And this.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY6JKALNwKE

      Don't you hate it when facts make a huge post like yours, with all the time you spent typing it, into nothing but fantasy, nonsense, and drivel? Personally, I'd track down whoever gave you your talking points and slap them for making you look ridiculous in front of the whole world.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    77. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Unless I was completely not paying attention in Civics class, I recall that "enforcement of the law " falls under the executive branch of the government. There is a guy at the top of the executive right now who is up for reelection in a few months. Im fairly certain thats who GP was referring to.

    78. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      If you are implying that it doesnt matter who you vote for and what their political ideology is, then Id say your idea is as toxic an idea as any other here.

    79. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Said hypothetical republican didnt, and its kind of ridiculous that youre defending one person's actions by claiming his alternative would have hypothetically acted the same.

    80. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      'ER' when you sell yourself on 'HOPE AND CHANGE' that instead becomes 'TRAPPED IN DESPAIR', well, you're pretty much gonna mark yourself up as a fuckup. Promise too much and deliver too little and not only do you lose any chance or re-election you end up looking like a back stabbing betraying arse hole.

      So while it can be said the current administration is better than the previous one, the previous one seemed more closely aligned with what people expected from it than does the current one. In fact the current one seems wildly at divergence to it's main core promises.

      When it comes to elections you never vote a person in, by then it is too late already. In the US you vote people in during the primaries, when it comes to the actual elections you vote people out. To put it simply the Democrats fucked up when they didn't offer an alternative to Obama, their choice, their doom.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    81. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      I know you're trolling, but the PS2 was arguable pretty darn good.

    82. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember who was in charge when this happened and vote accordingly next election.

      hmm, we remembered who was in charge the election before that, went with a new party, yet nothing has changed.

      So why would it change this time?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    83. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Just as then, Jews are now increasingly being blamed for all the ills caused by the political leaders of their own political parties & nations.

      I thought people didn't like Jews because they claimed to be the children of god and better then everyone else?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    84. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bravia engine. That one rocks.

    85. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Israel and Zionists in general were such great beacons of democracy and human rights (with allowing Israeli Arabs to enjoy full citizenship), perhaps they would consider the same honor for the people of Gaza and the West Bank, instead of slowing encroaching on their land, no?

    86. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People still buy Sony products? What worthy product have they even produced in the last two decades?

      Headphones.

    87. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by MobileC · · Score: 1

      Remember who was in charge when this happened and vote accordingly next election.

      John Key?

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    88. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel is not really a democracy. If you are not Jewish, you cannot buy land. In some Jewish areas of Jerusalem women are not allowed to be on the bus with men. They have to wear 'modest' clothing etc etc. The same type of religious weirdos are in control as in Saudi Arabia.

    89. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by impaledsunset · · Score: 2

      That should read “vote Gary Johnson”.

      Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution.
      Ron Paul doesn't believe in a government-funded space program.
      Ron Paul doesn't believe in the right of a woman to control her own body.
      Ron Paul says he stands for civil liberties, but all that he wants to do is transfer the takeover of civil liberties to the states government.
      Ron Paul is ready to go against the status quo by applying unusual ideas, but he's not willing to adapt those ideas to the real world. Some people would argue that this can be nearly destructive.

      Gary Johnson carries a similar message, but he's more reasonable, has proven himself as a governor, and has far less gotchas in his policies. He also has a chance of making a difference - while he could not win, he can get his party noticed, and could have an effect on the policy of whoever gets elected. Ron Paul is now only seen as a clown of the Republican party.

      Of course, Gary Johnson has a few problems of his own - like his stance on Net Neutrality, but the rest of his stances make up for that, and make up for it by much.

    90. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      If you are implying that it doesnt matter who you vote for and what their political ideology is, then Id say your idea is as toxic an idea as any other here.

      Not implying anything of the kind. I'm saying that if you're justifying, excusing, defending, and denying the responsibility of "your guy's" (whoever that may be) actions and policies simply because you think he's only 99% as evil as the "other guy", then you're part of the problem.

      For instance, I detest in the strongest terms Obama's actions and policies, but Bush was also a disaster. That in no way excuses Obama, nor Bush. These recent attempts to lay blame for all of Obama's blunders and plain bad policies on Bush is disingenuous, at best. The same for Bush blaming Clinton.

      "The buck stops here."

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    91. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Israel sets up bigger detention camps. Israel has become just like the Nazis.

    92. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, are you the radical. Israel has turned into nothing more than what Germany became under Hitler. And my post has nothing to do with Jews or religion. It has to do with the "state" of Israel which is nothing less that a terrorist state. Israel never had a "home land". Israel is stolen land "given" to them post-WW II. Some day it will be returned to its rightful owners.

    93. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by niteshifter · · Score: 1

      Ala BlueStrat's response above, with the same comment on verbosity, I'll leave this for you:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_citizens_of_Israel#Politics

      Note the mention of the presence of a Palestinian Arab sitting on the Supreme Court

    94. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times in history were Jews mass executed? once? How many times were everybody else mass executed by Christians/Muslims? They're gone now. All 3 of those religions are a problem. They all teach the join us or die attitude.

    95. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Playstation.

    96. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just stop buying their products won't help.
      I don't live in the US, but here in sweden, the entertainment industry receives a compensation for each blank cd or dvd that is sold.
      I think mp3 players are also included and that they're trying, if they didn't already succeed to extend it to usb pen-drives and harddisks.

      This means that they basically receive a tax from things you buy, and are more or less funded like a government agency, which is absurd.

    97. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly why I'm voting for Ron Paul, regardless of whether or not he wins the republican nomination.

    98. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sony reader PRS-T1.
      </apart from aquaducts, what have the Romans done for us>

    99. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, the Second Amendment, gotta love it. That's why democracy in America so responsively and dutifully reflects the will of the grassroots. That's why Americans will never have to put up with warrantless, intrusive searches, why they'll never be punished without due process of law, why their law enforcement agents are so courteous and transparent in their actions...

    100. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the act of "grabbing as much as you can for you and yours" is precisely what will cause the system to collapse fastest and most catastrophically. Leaving a very large part of the population to - well, die.

      What you're advocating is just pure evil. It may be "advisable", but only if your advisor has the morality of a Bond-level supervillain. To anyone else, it's simply unacceptable.

    101. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you feel about an American who commits no crime in the USA being extradted to another country for breaking its laws without ever having lef home.

    102. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      So voting for the greater of the evils is a good idea? That's fairly odd logic.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    103. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, like the sheep will vote against him. Why, oh why, does National still have good opinion poll ratings?!?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    104. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Ah, no... Crown Law is the legal representation. The Ministry of Justice is the arm that does things, probably under direction from the Department of Internal Affairs. Despite that, the courts ordered the government to nominate a department to take the flak if the court case failed, and the Police got that dubious honour.

      Besides, Sovereign Immunity.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    105. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution.

      Who cares?

      Ron Paul doesn't believe in a government-funded space program.

      Neither do I. The private sector can do a better job.

      Ron Paul doesn't believe in the right of a woman to control her own body.

      No, he believes in the rights of the people to decide whether abortion is allowed in their area.

      Ron Paul says he stands for civil liberties, but all that he wants to do is transfer the takeover of civil liberties to the states government.

      No, that's nonsense, and many of the things he wants transferred to state control would be much better there. It's much easier to affect changes at a state level than Federal.

      Ron Paul is ready to go against the status quo by applying unusual ideas, but he's not willing to adapt those ideas to the real world. Some people would argue that this can be nearly destructive.

      There is nothing unusual or wrong with his ideas, so I don't see what your complaint is.

      Gary Johnson carries a similar message, but he's more reasonable, has proven himself as a governor, and has far less gotchas in his policies. He also has a chance of making a difference - while he could not win, he can get his party noticed, and could have an effect on the policy of whoever gets elected.

      You're right--he doesn't have enough support to win. Meanwhile Ron Paul seems to have no trouble attracting notice....thousands show up for every rally, including 4,200 in the middle of a rain storm yesterday. Where's these big rallies that Gary Johnson is holding?

    106. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      "but you hold blameless the country responsible for making them refugees in the first place."

      I would suggest you study history a little better. If you would do that, you'd find out that it was the attacking Arab armies that told the resident Arabs living in Israel in 1948 to flee into the real estate now held by what we falsely call “Palestinians”. The ones we call by that name are all ethnic Arabs and could have been assimilated by the large Arab countries surrounding the tiny nation of Israel.

      The Palestinians at that time were told that after the Arabs drive Israel into the sea, they could not only have their land back, but also on the land and goods of the Jews. Every single time since 1948, so far in all the wars, it was always the Arabs that attacked Israel. So far the Arabs have always lost every single attack. Remember, for thousands of years this has been true: the winner gets the spoils, no matter who starts the war. Israel is here to stay, regardless of whether the US or anybody else helps them. Just remember this: it was Jews that helped the US develop & build nuclear weapons. Jews know how to build nukes. Israel has them, but will only use them if pushed to the edge of survival by their enemies.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    107. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's people like you who give kikes a bad name.

    108. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Occams · · Score: 1

      You cannot balance out the past influence of the neocons by voting for a guy who is in the center. You will only maintain the status quo that way. That is why we still have troops in Afghanistan.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    109. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      It's people like you who give kikes a bad name.

      Coming from a bigot that would call Jews "kikes", I consider it a badge of honor.

      Your dry-cleaner left you a message. Your KKK robes are ready for your big cross-burning this weekend. You and the NBPP play nice, now.

      BTW, I'm not Jewish. I'm a Christian of mostly German descent. However, I have serious doubts that you even qualify as Cro-Magnon.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    110. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It was modded funny. So we have all lost unless the moderators understand that we laugh because we dare not cry.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    111. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Hitler claimed he wasn't a Jew either. I guess you aren't a kike. Those people have a bit of pride, unlike yourself.

    112. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      I concede your point but in a closed 2 party system you have to take the lesser of two evils. At this point I haven't been able to decide which of the two is most evil. I've got a strong feeling that this election will be less about each candidates record and more about how much mud the respective PAC's can sling. We're in for a long bumpy ride folks.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    113. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the other guy would have been less sensitive to corporate interests, I have a bridge in Brooklyn and some swamp land in Florida to sell you. The real problem is that despite having two parties, the people of America having no one representing them. The RIAA and MPAA got the result they paid for.

    114. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Those people have a bit of pride, unlike yourself.

      LMAO!!!

      Coming from someone who only tosses out ad hominems because you're unable to dispute facts, while being too much of a coward to use a real username!

      Yeah, OK there, "Junior". Does Mummy and Daddy know you're on their computer? I get the feeling you're either actually or just mentally about 10 years old.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    115. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I concede your point but in a closed 2 party system you have to take the lesser of two evils.

      No, you don't. That's what they want you to think.

      Remember the lesser of two evils is still evil. If Obama is 97% evil and Romney is 99% evil, you're still voting for a shit load of evil.

      Voting third party, as unlikely as it is to affect the election, is still more likely to actually cause change than voting for either major party.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    116. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      I don't want to say whether or not Ron Paul is the best choice out there, but the claim the private sector can do a better job in the same thread as complaining about corporate media abusing power seems a bit at odds. I mean if private sector completely controlled the space program do you somehow think they WOULDN'T abuse it?

    117. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ron Paul doesn't believe in the right of a woman to control her own body.

      Correct, he believes in the rights of the people to decide whether abortion is allowed in their area.

      FTFY. Your "no" implies that the two are mutually exclusive. But unless by "area" you mean an area surrounded by 4 walls, a ceiling, and a floor that is known as a doctors office (and that only the people inside that area should have any say on abortions happening within that area), then the two are actually quite compatible.

      In other words, if I have a say over some woman I've never met who lives hundreds of miles away having an abortion, then that woman does not have control of her own body.

    118. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      This is also why voting is now pointless, as the extreme amount of money required to even get into congress assures that anyone who makes it to that level will have already had to have sold out simply to get enough cash to get the job. As a history buff once noted "Originally a congressional post was to be about as simple and cheap as getting a slot on a town council" but the influence of money has made the entire system simply too corrupt for honesty to survive in. this is why while many will talk about how evil Wall street is none will actually do anything significant to them, as it would be biting the hand that feeds.

      so really all one can do is grab as much as you can for you and yours and wait for the inevitable collapse. The amount of corruption is just too deep, the amount of influence too powerful, anyone with eyes can see we are headed towards a global economic meltdown but the stopping of this would cause pain to both rich and poor and thanks to bribery the rich will never tolerate this so we keep right on driving towards the cliff. all we can do now is try to protect our own as best we can and wait for the collapse, there really is nothing else the public can do.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    119. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yes, and in the real world it's still less evil. If your choice is between less or more, not none or some, then picking more because they're both evil anyway does not a rational choice make.

    120. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Do the RIAA and MPAA even have elections? Plenty of those affected will have no right to vote in either the USA or New Zealand in any case.

      Yes the RIAA and MPAA have elections.
      And you don't have to be a USA or even a New Zealand citizen to vote. Just need to be a shareholder.

    121. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the world is not quite as simple and clear cut as you make it out to be. There are many who interpret things much differently than you. As a worshipper of selfishness, a trait you share in common with much of our corrupted society, of course you are prevented from seeing things from anything other than your own limited viewpoint. Big picture thinking is clearly out of the question for you.

      Fortunately, Ron Paul happens to be a bit wiser and more knowledgeable about a great many more things than you, which is why it's good that he is presently winning the Republican nomination. You're getting a Ron Paul presidency whether you want it or not. You can thank God for that.

    122. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by pugugly · · Score: 1

      Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution.

      Who cares?

      I care. The very nature of the fact that Ron Paul does not believe in evolution means that Ron Paul does not accept the scientific method, the fundamental insight into how the universe works that underlies the most productive period and greatest increase in human quality of life in the 30,000 years since we developed brains that could manage deep comprehension.

      If you don't care about that, whatever values you may share with me are not supported by any logical thought, only unsupported intuitions you happen to hold, not anything I may place trust in as a principle. You are an trained primate subject to the next leash you are talked into next putting about your throat, and trusting you to hold to any principle you claim to espouse reduces me to the same.

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    123. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the world is not quite as simple and clear cut as you make it out to be.

      Actually, in the very narrow instance that I described, it pretty much is exactly as I made it out to be. If I can tell a woman 100 miles away that I've never met that they cannot have an abortion, then that woman lacks full control of her body. No where do I say if that is "right" or "wrong", I'm simply stating the facts as they are.

      Fortunately, Ron Paul happens to be a bit wiser and more knowledgeable about a great many more things than you, which is why it's good that he is presently winning the Republican nomination. You're getting a Ron Paul presidency whether you want it or not. You can thank God for that.

      Ah, I see, you were just being sarcastic. Thanks for clearing that up.

      Although on the off-chance that you're being serious.. God actually came to me in a dream last night. He told me that the only people who should be involved in the decision of any given abortion are the mother, her doctor, Himself, and perhaps the father, and that earthly governments should stay the fuck out.

    124. Re:Trial and extradition were never the goal by Painted · · Score: 1

      So your response to an individual who says that he doesn't trust someone who puts aside rational, scientific thought for a belief system in the "sky daddy" is that the rationalist is a "worshiper of selfishness" and that "Bit picture thinking is clearly out of the question for you." And you conclude with "You can thank the Sky-Daddy for some future event that hasn't happened yet."

      You sir, are exactly the sort of anti-rational thought individual who is fighting tooth and nail to hold back progress of society and harm everyone* for your personal belief in a bunch of fairy tales told by a group of iron and bronze age desert wanderers. YOU are the problem- smell yourself before you start attacking others for not sharing your personal belief system.

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
  2. Wasn't that the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If their goal was to shutdown his site and put him out of business, they seem to have succeeded.

  3. Expect nothing to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This problem will not be corrected. Too many people neither understand nor care, and too many wealthy and powerful people are keenly interested in retaining this ability to eliminate competition though abuse of the legal system.

    1. Re:Expect nothing to be done by davester666 · · Score: 1

      This problem will be corrected.

      New charges will be filed in order to easily exceed this 'threshold' for extradition.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Expect nothing to be done by rthille · · Score: 1

      Reading "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" leads me to believe that we who care need to make things much worse for those who don't, so they _will_ care. Only then will change happen.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    3. Re:Expect nothing to be done by tqk · · Score: 1

      Reading "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" leads me to believe that we who care need to make things much worse for those who don't, so they _will_ care.

      Mmm ... Multiple boxcars full of rocks raining down on MafiAA offices, ... Mmm ...

      A boxcar full of rocks falling at terminal velocity would probably surpass anything in the US arsenal short of a nuke. Mmm ...

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Expect nothing to be done by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      And how do you propose doing that? Bearing in mind that the similarities between the book and the current situation in the US are...negligible.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  4. Shit Like This... by darthdavid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    makes me embarrassed to be an American. I'll be voting Socialist come November and encouraging everyone I know to vote third party, not that it will make a difference. The unwashed masses will continue voting keep voting for Ds and Rs because "anything else is a wasted vote...", and the Ds and Rs will keep sucking corporate cock at every opportunity because they know where their bread is buttered.

    1. Re:Shit Like This... by interval1066 · · Score: 0

      This would have never gone down with a liberatarian administration.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    2. Re:Shit Like This... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope, instead the MAFIAA would've sent goons from Pinkerton's in to wreck the hosting company's offices and server rooms.

    3. Re:Shit Like This... by anwaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This would have never gone down with a liberatarian administration.

      You may be right: for example, the extremely wealthy backers of the MPAA and RIAA would simply pay top dollar to a platoon of mercenaries, who would level the data centers and murder everyone that provided the services. If there were still a DoJ and Court system, they would already have bought off all the prosecutors and judges. Case closed.
      Or do you think this wouldn't happen under a Libertarian administration either? If so, what do you understand to be the Libertarian proposal for a system of justice?

    4. Re:Shit Like This... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      And you're telling me you do?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    5. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're claiming that corruption would kill the libertarian utopia, then consider the OP was claiming he would vote socialist.

    6. Re:Shit Like This... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Libertarians with their extreme capitalist views would do anything to protect MPIAA and RIAA. Dog eat dog capitalism. When they talk about 'liberty', it's liberty of abusing others, protecting everything you own (with weapons if necessary) and pure freedom to do anything.

    7. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, private security agents would have been dispatched to rub him out. Of course, you don't actually pay attention to what they REALLY care about.

    8. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First: You misunderstood him; understandable, since "liberatarian" is not a word, but he meant a librarian administration, not libertarian... ;)

      Seriously: "Libertarian" doesn't identify a unique philosophical or practical viewpoint; it refers to one or several fairly broad families of thought focused on similar (in some ways) principles. In the US, libertarians are almost always capitalist, but note that there are also "socialist libertarians", more common in Europe; I'm going to disregard them from here out and take libertarian to mean "capitalist libertarian", since AFAIK that's what you and GP meant.

      Many (IMO most) people who describe themselves as "libertarian" don't even go so far as to support what's known as "minimalist government" or minarchism, i.e. that the only legitimate branches of government are military, courts, and police (note there's not even a legislature -- the notion being that all the truly necessary and proper laws may be written into the constitution, and that if times change enough that that needs changed, you can always abolish the government and start over. As I said, many/most don't even go that far -- and yes, a few go even further, suggesting that one or more of those three branches (commonly the military) may be replaced by private sector and/or self-organized action. But about time their ideal government doesn't have a court system, they usually identify as anarchist rather than libertarian.

      And even if there is no government court, the (IMO dubious) assumption is generally that a system of private-sector courts will provide justice, and in every treatment of this concept I've read, the party purporting to be harmed (i.e. Kim Dotcom, his business partners, and/or his surviving family) get to choose the court in which they bring suit. So unless they've bought off every private court in the land, and keep buying off new ones as they come up, we may presume that the suit would proceed in one of the non-bought-off courts -- makes it worse, not better, for your thesis.

      And as to buying off prosecutors and judges -- what stops that from happening now? Oh, yeah, it's against the law, so the next layer of prosecutors and judges will throw your ass in jail and/or fine you heavily for it. (Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Well, theoretically, if/when corruption gets bad enough, the people revolt, usually followed up by installing an even worse government; life sucks that way.) Same exact mechanism applies to most libertarian conceptions of the state. And sending mercs (or doing it yourself) to murder anyone would be a serious crime in any libertarian ideal I've ever heard of. So it's really hard to see how the scenario you propose would play out any differently at all in a libertarian state than in what we have.

    9. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be voting Socialist come November and encouraging everyone I know to vote third party, not that it will make a difference.

      I've decided that this election, I am not going to vote.

      Instead, I am going to write a letter to each and every candidate on the ballot pointing out and explaining exactly why I did not vote for them specifically.

      I don't mind if they assume that means I voted for the other party, assume I voted for no one, or assume I don't matter.
      But I want them to know why they have failed me on an individual level.

      As you say, voting literally does not matter. They will rig things how they want them to be, and with their new MS access voting machines that can be over written by inserting a flash card, there is no uncertainty they WILL get the results they want. Fuck that noise.

      If each candidate sleeps a little less well at night knowing how they have failed us all and seeing exactly how worse off they have made the world, then I will consider my efforts to have had more effect than a single vote could any day.

    10. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... You find none of the third-party candidates acceptable?

      OK... So don't vote for them, and by all means write those letters. But not voting at all? That's just crazy. Write-in exists for a reason -- write yourself in, or if you're concerned with the privacy loss, write in "Guy Fawkes", "Thomas Jefferson", or perhaps the satiric choice "Nehemiah Scudder" (particularly this year!). Most districts are not contested enough to be worth fucking with the results and the entailing risk of scandal. If yours chances to be one of them, and you didn't vote, then the only signal you send is the letters, where you could have sent an additional signal for very little effort by voting. Personally, I have always found one or more of the third party candidates acceptable (not going to go into which, as that's beside the point), but if you don't, fine -- a write-in still gets counted as a vote that wasn't for any of the parties.

    11. Re:Shit Like This... by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      I'll be voting Socialist come November

      That'll show them.

      Voting is necessary but not sufficient. The vote comes too late: If the incumbent wins, he thinks he's got a mandate to keep doing what he's been doing. If the incumbent loses, the new guy thinks he's got a mandate to do whatever he wants. In no event does voting send the right message, unless your vote actually changes the outcome of the election -- and good luck with that.

      You need to make sure they understand what you need them to do before the election, that way they can actually do it. We didn't stop SOPA by voting anybody out of office -- we stopped it with millions of letters and phone calls, threatening to vote them out. If it actually comes down to you having to make good on the threat, you can certainly vote them out if you have the numbers, but by then it's already too late.

      You can't just make a credible threat and then execute it. You're missing the most important part, which is to make sure they understand that you're going to kick them to the curb if they don't do what you want. So get off your ass and write a letter to your congress critters.

    12. Re:Shit Like This... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I can talk about of rediciulous crap too. GTFO.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    13. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intellectual property is incompatible with libertarianism. (See: http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf)

    14. Re:Shit Like This... by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 2

      What? From what I've saw, libertarians in the US are generally pro-free market. Copyright doesn't allow for a free market at all.

    15. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter who you vote for, the entire political system is outdated. Half a century ago a 4-year term was ok, but in this fast-paced world 4 years is like writing someone a blank cheque. The only fix is turn the political system upside down, make candidates sign contracts with penalties, post bonds, do something to make sure they don't break promises and behave. Shorten the terms, if only to give people a chance to "review" the government annually and say "good enough, keep going" or "no, fire them now an hire someone else."

      Alas, the Americans have so much hubris that they will let get things much worse before they realize their precious "democracy" is totally outdated.

    16. Re:Shit Like This... by Toonol · · Score: 0

      This is a bit like criticizing Obama because he is selling our secrets to the Martians. Making successful arguments against something which is NOT AT ALL TRUE is not hard, but it also isn't any form of victory. It may feel like a victory, but that's simply a consequence of your own faulty understanding.

      Let me put it this way: Why should we listen to you, a wife beater and crack cocaine user? Wife beaters and crack cocaine users are bad.

      Do you understand?

    17. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voting for the interregnum of the prophets (Nehemiah Scudder) would probably fall on deaf ears... If enough voted for that name to even get the attention of Faux News, they would just spin it as "see, people do want a religious theocracy run by a prophet". Whilst the rest of us would understand satire, they might get a movement off the ground to actually make that happen. I shudder to think that someday Europeans or South Americans or someone might have to actually debate organizing an action to "liberate" the USA.

    18. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Libertarians with their extreme capitalist views would do anything to protect MPIAA and RIAA. Dog eat dog capitalism.

      These two sentences are contradictory.

      Libertarians believe in a separation of government and corporations. What we have right now is a government that engages in protectionism as you describe; it's been the Libertarian platform to do away with that kind of crony protectionism, because the current system has been un-capitalistic (bailing out loser companies who fail in the marketplace with taxpayer money, contrary to what someone may have told you, is the opposite of libertarian)

    19. Re:Shit Like This... by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      If people opposed to it (either out of ideology or ignorance) lie about it long enough, people who don't know any better believe them. Arguments like M1FCJ's are why the current corrupt politicians continue to win: they're willing to lie repeatedly about policies which might actually change something. Power brokers simply describe the opposition as the antithesis of what the opposition actually stands for and people without the time/intelligence/morals (pick one) continue to support the power brokers.

    20. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're voting Obama again?

    21. Re:Shit Like This... by green1 · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing libertarian and anarchist. (common misconception)

    22. Re:Shit Like This... by tqk · · Score: 1

      I'm tempted to say, "Save your breath" (or typing). For most that I've read on /., "libertarian" is parsed as "Tea Party", and that's as deep as they go into it. They can't begin to concieve of a gov't that's not beholden to some sort of special interests. Still, thanks for writing it. I concur on pretty much all of it based on my understanding of the subject.

      *I wish* people would do some reading and research into it before condemning it, but I doubt I'll see that trend happening in my lifetime. Cf. all the vitriol sent Ron Paul's way these days.

      Laissez nous faire. :-)

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    23. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How would libertarianism not degrade into what the parent poster said (hint: he used a historical reference for a reason)?

    24. Re:Shit Like This... by tqk · · Score: 1

      Libertarians with their extreme capitalist views would do anything to protect MPIAA and RIAA. Dog eat dog capitalism. When they talk about 'liberty', it's liberty of abusing others, protecting everything you own (with weapons if necessary) and pure freedom to do anything.

      Not one of those describes libertarian theory in reality. You're making stuff up because you want to believe them. Shame on you. McCarthyism was better done than this.

      Do some research before you make yourself look this ignorant next time.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    25. Re:Shit Like This... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      As much as it disgusts me that you're voting for "Socialists" (we need less government control of our money), good on you for voting for a third party.

      The only true wasted vote is a vote for the Democrats or the Republicans.

    26. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally write-in only works if the written in candidate filed with the state, but did not have enough signatures/petitions/whatever (I'm foggy on this part of it) to actually make it onto the ballot proper. Write-ins for a candidate that didn't file aren't considered valid! I assume they just ignore that field and use the rest of your (presumably valid) values for the election, but it's important for people to know if this really matter to them, they need to get a candidate filed, not just 'write one in'!!!

      We have the internet for a reason, there's no excuse for reddit 4chan, slashdot, or any of a million other sites not mobilizing and not only getting a candidate filed, but getting a candidate on the ballot.

      We had at most, what, 300 million people in the US? (Maybe 220, I haven't looked in a while.) That means we need between 22 and 30 million people to get the 10 percent minimum for government campaign assistance. Given the hubbub around SOPA/PIPA and globally, to ACTA, we shouldn't have any trouble getting enough people willing to do it. Additionally why can't we have a candidate that will *IGNORE* the controversial issues? Abortion, Religion, Global Warming, those are state/congressional problems. Have the presidential candidate only position himself on the issues that will unite us instead. Data-retention laws, the TSA, illegal detainment of 'civilians' in military prisons, stuff that at least 50 percent of people would get behind (less sure on that prison one.) The point is, there's lots of things we could be doing that would start the ball rolling towards removal of the incumbents and the bipartisan system from the equation, all you smarter guys than me just need to start dreaming up the ways.

      - vranash

    27. Re:Shit Like This... by ukemike · · Score: 1

      Not true, I believe that you are the one who is confused. Libertarians have always advocated a lack or regulations, especially on business (corporate) activity. Private enforcement organizations like the Pinkertons thrive under libertarian conditions. Most strains of anarchism believe that all hierarchical concentrations of power including both governments and corporations are antithetical to human freedom and liberty.

      Also know your history, the Pinkertons in particular have been used repeatedly to destroy anarchist labor movements. So to say that anything associated with the Pinkertons is anarchist is beyond ignorant it is insulting in the extreme.

      The biggest difference I see between libertarians and anarchists is that libertarians are only concerned with government power, anarchists are concerned with all concentrations of power.

      --
      -- QED
    28. Re:Shit Like This... by OhPlz · · Score: 2

      They can't begin to concieve of a gov't that's not beholden to some sort of special interests.

      Humans always favor some over others. Unless we're to be ruled by circuitry, government will always exhibit the same behavior. The brand name doesn't matter.

    29. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of us know perfectly well what libertarianism is. I was a libertarian myself back in uni days.

      We also do know our history, which has ample examples of why "very small government" inevitably leads either to anarchy, or to an authoritarian take-over (and often it's the first followed by the second). It simply isn't a stable state of affairs: a power vacuum will be filled, and if you refuse to fill it with what you believe is best, it will be filled by those most willing to fill it: i.e., sociopaths with a power lust.

    30. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Ayn Rand would disagree.

    31. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Copyright is just another form of property. It's not any more or less artificial than many common modes of private property, such as stocks. Why would it not allow for a free market?

    32. Re:Shit Like This... by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      So if a small government won't work, then the answer is a large government? Seems we're seeing how well that works right now...

    33. Re:Shit Like This... by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize she was the Queen of Libertania.

      I think you'll find a great many libertarians disagree with Ayn Rand.

    34. Re:Shit Like This... by BoberFett · · Score: 2

      Because a government enforced monopoly (i.e. patents and copyrights) wouldn't be supported by a libertarian government. If you want to protect your idea, protect it yourself by never telling anyone.

    35. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A small government cannot work, because there's simply not enough of it. A large government can work, the trick is to make sure that it works in your interest. Other countries seem to manage that, more or less (e.g. New Zealand...).

    36. Re:Shit Like This... by tqk · · Score: 1

      Most of us know perfectly well what libertarianism is.

      You haven't been reading /. comments all that carefully, else you wouldn't say that. Some of you understand it. Most of you haven't a clue what libertarianism means, and generally go off on ridiculous tangents based on personal beliefs, not facts or informed opinions.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    37. Re:Shit Like This... by tqk · · Score: 1

      Humans always favor some over others.

      Not true. Some of us are driven by principle. What's right is right, and what's wrong is wrong, regardless of who's promoting or denigrating it.

      Civilization shouldn't be a popularity contest.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:Shit Like This... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Calling NZ's Government "large" is like calling a sparrow a 747. Consider the US Federal Government alone is 27% of the US GDP, and employs somewhere around 6% of the total workforce. Add in States and municipalities and we're pushing close to 40% of the entire GDP and 15% of the total employment.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re:Shit Like This... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      They may advocate a lack of regulations - but that's different to a total absence. I challenge you to find any self-identified libertarian that advocates making companies immune to charges of break-and-enter or malicious damage of property. On the other hand, I can find you several self-identified libertarians (myself included) who would advocate the revocation and prohibition of corporate charters entirely. Libertarians are generally fans of removing any sort of "special case" provisions for corporations, whether favourable or unfavourable to the corporation itself.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    40. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yes, the problem with your government is also that it's highly inefficient and wasteful in comparison to most other developed countries.

      Still, any libertarian or fiscal conservative would consider NZ government "large" - after all, it's got a social safety network, public healthcare, and all those other icky "socialist" things. Oh, and higher taxes (33% from income over US$63k).

    41. Re:Shit Like This... by OhPlz · · Score: 2

      Two people will never agree entirely on right and wrong, that's the human factor. That's why there competing parties, competing ideas. That's also the basis for democracy. There would be no need for elections if everyone believed in the same sets of right and wrong. The mere fact that we have self-consciousness makes pure altruism unattainable. We vote for whoever has a belief system that's closest to our own. Then we hope they'll stay true to their campaign rhetoric, we end up disappointed once again when they fail, and then it's campaign season again.

    42. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're already doing the socialist-fascist thing with dems and repubs. Vote libertarian; a small government has no power over you so it is not worth corrupting and can't hurt you anyway even if it is corrupt.

    43. Re:Shit Like This... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Copyright bears no resemblance to real property nor was it ever intended to.

    44. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      My point was that private (as opposed to personal) property is just as much legal fiction as copyright - it does not exist without a government that says otherwise and enforces that. Your ownership of a piece of paper called a "stock" would not be real property in any sense if there weren't laws and guns to say otherwise.

    45. Re:Shit Like This... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Stock cannot be duplicated. If I take your stock, you don't have it anymore. While both require an enforcement of law to have any real value (as opposed to real property that can be defended by force), they are quite distinct. Many who do not support copyright are strongly in favor of intangible property ion general.

    46. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've more chance of this in a voluntary voting system than a compulsory voting system.

    47. Re:Shit Like This... by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was just sitting here thinking how embarassing it is to be a Kiwi right now.

      I wonder how illustrative our current 'roll over, sit up and beg' behaviour towards the US is of the suffering our various governments have felt at being largely left out in the cold by the US (a relationship only recently showing signs of warming). This was of course our own fault, having allowed domestic anti-nuclear sentiment to damage our relationship as US allies - allies being a title we have only recently regained.

      It rankles being a US lap-dog. But, realistically, we need the support and it couldn't hurt for our nation to remember that the tail typically does not wag the dog.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    48. Re:Shit Like This... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In a lot of cases it is no misconception. There is everything from anarchists to outright royalists (with established rich families as the new aristocracy) hinding under a flag and calling themselves "libertarians". You may be from a different faction but the anarchists scream "libertarian" as loudly as any.

    49. Re:Shit Like This... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Libertarianism isn't anarchism.

    50. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it is. I said it leads to either anarchy or authoritarianism.

    51. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you trhink you need less government son, your part of the problem and another one who has been fooled into dichotomy a false dichotomy.

    52. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you are ridiculous crap though is rather obvious.

    53. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the American voting scheme is showing its age, it's not as bad as it looks on the surface. There are true choices available in the primaries of the major parties. The fact that the alternatives don't get the nomination is not the fault of the system. And in Fact, the example of Joe Lieberman shows that even independents can win tough elections.

      The true culprit: the American culture. The Americans tend to like money, capitalists and corporations.

    54. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're dumb and you don't know what you're talking about.

    55. Re:Shit Like This... by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      The same goes for Socialism. People thing because it was abused by corrupt governments that it is some how evil. Not many people bother to look at it without all the history behind how it was used.

    56. Re:Shit Like This... by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      Sorry thats a cop-out. we can generally agree on how to procced with the most important things like energy, and making a living. But you have to be living from your heart and not from a place of fear to understand that.

    57. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ayn Rand was a fuck freak, power freak, and loved the ideology of mass murderers. Read about her and get sick. It's good that the old bitch is dead.

    58. Re:Shit Like This... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing libertarian and anarchist. (common misconception)

      No, he's not.

      Libertarianism is just a facade for either anarchy (no laws) or facsims (corporate laws). Take your pick, but either way libertarianism is a failure and only ends up as a failed state or corporate state. The idea that government can be weaker then individuals yet stronger then corporations is akin to the idea that we'll fall off the edge of the earth.

      Libertarianism will fail for the same reason Stalin's regime failed and Pol Pot's regime failed. They require everyone to believe in exactly the same thing and willingly follow the rules established by that society. Pol Pot and Stalin had to imprison and murder thousands (millions in the case of Pol Pot) to keep their societies working and they both eventually failed.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    59. Re:Shit Like This... by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Oh, and higher taxes (33% from income over US$63k).

      To be honest, that doesn't sound that high. I don't know what 63K USD gets in terms of lifestyle, so 33% may be quite a bit for the middle class. But it's paltry for high-income earners, just the same as the US tax system. Also, income tax is just a small piece of the puzzle: US long-term capital gains (e.g. many investments held at least 1 year) cap out much lower (IIRC 15%) and represent more of the "income" of wealthy individuals/organizations. Plus, capital losses can be applied to later gains to offset tax burden. This is convenient in contrast to Joe Schmoe whose "gains" (income) and "losses" (i.e. income-interrupting events) both tend to be taxable (disability, workman's comp, unemployment) or breakeven (unpaid time off, maybe furlough).

      So how do long-term capital gains get taxed in NZ?

    60. Re:Shit Like This... by smellotron · · Score: 1

      [Copyright is] not any more or less artificial than many common modes of private property, such as stocks.

      Are you suggesting that stocks are artificial? They represent beneficial ownership which is very real. Furthermore, the paper or electronic records that they reside in are no less real than fiat currency. Copyright (or any other "IP" right) is an institutionalized monopoly, not like property at all.

    61. Re:Shit Like This... by ukemike · · Score: 1

      Excellent! We are in agreement then about what ought to be, and we both learned a bit as well.

      --
      -- QED
    62. Re:Shit Like This... by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      You have me curious.
      As a fellow Libertarian and entrepreneur as well, how would removal of corporate charters and such things as limited liability affect commerce in your opinion.
      I could imagine doing away with most of the special stuff, but without a limited liability vehicle of some kind for group investment... how would you allow people to take risks with money?

      An LLC could take the risks of space launches, the company is liable for a rocket booster landing on a house against all odds. While if the people who run it are responsible... well they would likely never get off the ground! The structure of some kind of limited liability is key in allowing any kind of safe handling of risk. If there is nowhere to stop the blame other than individuals. Then you wind up with a heavily risk averse paralysis condition freezing up high risk experimentation & investment.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    63. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Funny you should ask that - they don't (or at least they didn't when I lived there 7 years ago). Short-term stock trading and such gets classified as plain income, but there's no capital gain tax at all, so long-term gains just go untaxed.

    64. Re:Shit Like This... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that stocks are artificial? They represent beneficial ownership which is very real.

      Any kind of property in something that you don't hold or use directly is artificial. Property itself is institutionalized monopoly - it lets you prevent other people from somehow using the thing that you own. In "natural state", without a government or a society, this works for stuff like your home and your car that you own simply by virtue of occupying and using, or at least preventing anyone else from occupying and using them - by force, if needed. But the claim that you own, say, a parcel of land somewhere across the globe makes no sense - you're not present there, so how would you enforce your monopoly on controlling it? The concept of owning an abstract share of, say, a mine or a factory, the one that you never set even set your foot on, is similarly abstract. It becomes concrete only when there is a universal agreement of everyone in the society to recognize such claims and collectively enforce them, and such agreement can only be truly universal when there is a monopoly on the use of legal force to do such an enforcement - in other words, a government (otherwise, you can end up in a situation where different parts of your society recognize different entitlements when it comes to property).

    65. Re:Shit Like This... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      They don't. We have no Capital Gains Tax, and the National (read: rich person's) Government refuses to consider one. Investment entities are taxed at 30% on the returns, but that's it.

      Also, the top tax rate is slightly higher - it's 34.70% once you factor in the contributions to ACC (Accident Compensation Corporation), the funding agency for the aforesaid public healthcare. And 15% sales tax on every good or service (even essential goods and services). Plus a massively high cost of living (roughly $5.74 USD per US gallon for milk as an example, and $7 USD for a block of cheese) and a generally below average wage rate (intermediate software developers get paid $64k NZD - that's $52k USD, which is paltry). Compound that with very high rental prices for property and up to 7% compounding interest on mortgages (coupled with exorbitantly high house prices too) and you make for a country where if you aren't rich, you're poor, or scraping by pretending not to be.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    66. Re:Shit Like This... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      A government with no power is as dangerous as, if not more so than, a government with too much. Dunno about you, but I like having law enforcement to protect me, ambulances to take me to hospital, and firemen to stop my house burning down.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    67. Re:Shit Like This... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Do you understand?

      I think so. You're saying that Obama stopped the selling of our secrets to the Martians that the Bush administration was involved in?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    68. Re:Shit Like This... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      What sort of liability do you want to eliminate? Because just making an entity a LLC doesn't eliminate liability, it just defers it. In general, the liability is deferred to either:
      a) Creditors
      b) Employees
      c) The Public
      All of these cases, I'd argue, are unacceptable. For instance, in your example, if you remove liability from the LLC, then the cost of their rocket booster landing on someone's house is likely to be paid for by the public, either in the form of the homeowners, or the government. Why should some poor random shmuck pay for an entrepreneur's "right" to take risks with their property and lives, while not getting any pay-off should they succeed? Why should the tax-payers?

      The answer in this case is insurance: the rocket booster company needs to insure against accidental house-flattening. If they can't insure, then either they won't get any investors because the personal risk to the investors is too great, or they'll get investors who'll lose the lot if it fails (thus reducing the pool of reckless investors who make investments without ensuring the moral behaviour of their beneficiaries). And failing to pay for catastrophic damage you might accidentally inflict on an innocent third party, is immoral.

      There are variations on that; you could create a pool of money that can be drawn on to pay for the damages inflicted by LLC entities. That is essentially what our governments do now, when they pay out money to employees of a company that went bust owing them money, or repair damage inflicted by LLC to public or private property, or subsidize a health system that repairs the human damage inflicted by an LLC. Registering as an LLC would require regular dues, actuarially determined to be sufficient to cover the cost to the pool of any liability. Of course, you've just recreated an insurance company there, except that the high-risk companies are likely to be subsidized by the low-risk ones - addressing that concerns just takes you closer and closer to true insurance. Whether operating such a pool of money is a proper function of government, or should be operated more as a charity/investment in itself depends on your own libertarian philosophy, I guess.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    69. Re:Shit Like This... by rilian4 · · Score: 1

      At least you figured out that voting 3rd party is worthwhile. That said, I personally disagree with your choice of 3rd party but hey, it's a free country... I prefer voting for those who cherish freedom and are willing to abide by the constitution. As you say, R's and D's for the most part have long since stopped doing that and Socialists by definition can't possibly abide by the constitution as their philosophy is diametrically opposed to the protections in the constitution. The US constitution sets limits on the powers of the Federal government and Socialism removes all those limits.

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    70. Re:Shit Like This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're several trillion dollars past those essential services, so you can stuff that strawman up your asshole.

    71. Re:Shit Like This... by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      If you truly think we "all generally agree" about energy, read some of the related topics that have come up on /. recently. The "generally agreeable" crowd expresses one point of view and everyone else posts as AC to avoid the onslaught of flame-bait and troll down mods that are the generally agreeable crowd's version of "I respectfully disagree". The assumption that any non-mainstream opinion is based in fear just adds a layer of arrogance on top of it all.

      Ask anyone who works hard and is taxed hard how agreeable they are with our ever increasing entitlement burden. Ask the half of America paying for groceries about the other half being subsidized by EBT. Ask the retired senior about how they make a living and what they think of the younger folks still paying in to a system that may not be there for them. Generally agreeable? Maybe if the question is "do you agree that everyone does or doesn't do something to make a living?" Sure. But the question is pointless.

    72. Re:Shit Like This... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I see your argument is awfully weak if you have to resort to ad-hominem insults rather than actually address the points. How pathetic your life must be that you actually feel insulted by the fact that someone disagrees with you.

      I suggest you actually read the statement, specifically the assertion that a government with too much power is also dangerous. The problem is getting a government with the exact right amount of power - not enough that they are beyond reproach when they do wrong, but enough that criminals do not see it as too ineffectual to retaliate against criminal behaviour.

      So I also suggest you shove your strawman up your ass, or something.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  5. Be thankful, Kim. by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "...having his business trashed this way, with 220 jobs lost, and millions left without access to their legitimate data."

    Kim, you should be thankful that this attempt to bring democracy to your country ended with so few casualties. The United States is generally far more aggressive regarding its use of military forces to support economic (corporate) policies. You could have been picked up by a bounty hunter, or kidnapped by operatives. I wish I could say I was joking here -- several federal legislators and officials have stated that they consider filesharing and copyright infringement to be supporting terrorism.

    On the upside, your sacrifice may bring additional business to New Zealand, as well as prompt a review of disaster recovery with an emphasis on protection against foreign governments. Again, I wish it was a joke -- ten years ago, disaster recovery plans centered around the damage backhoes and hurricanes could do. Today, those risks can be cheaply mitigated thanks to cloud architecture and data centers in almost every major city worldwide. The biggest threat which cannot be managed by a business anymore is the threat posed by a rogue foreign government such as the United States. Though I am hardly singling them out -- the UK, China, Iran, North Korea, India, Iraq, France, Germany and Egypt join them on the list of foreign governments who have attempted to destroy businesses extrajudicially.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Be thankful, Kim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you've been watching too many american movies... unless you are thinking of Osama's assassination?

    2. Re:Be thankful, Kim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two companies popped into my head:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITT_Corporation
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

      These companies serve as an example how US government can overthrow newly elected governments because some US corporation requests it.

    3. Re:Be thankful, Kim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sometimes reality is more scary than the movies.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition_by_the_United_States

      This has been going on for almost 2 decades now and you still believe it was a myth... :S

    4. Re:Be thankful, Kim. by mpe · · Score: 1

      Two companies popped into my head: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITT_Corporation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

      Not that these are the only possible examples.

      These companies serve as an example how US government can overthrow newly elected governments because some US corporation requests it.

      Also examples of how this kind of thing isn't "new". The US Government acting on behalf of supposedly "private business" goes back at least as far as the late 19th century.

    5. Re:Be thankful, Kim. by tqk · · Score: 1

      The biggest threat which cannot be managed by a business anymore is the threat posed by a rogue foreign government such as the United States. Though I am hardly singling them out -- the UK, China, Iran, North Korea, India, Iraq, France, Germany and Egypt join them on the list of foreign governments who have attempted to destroy businesses extrajudicially.

      The really sad bit is that list only touches upon those governments guilty of this, and the various MafiAA organs are working on the rest, pushing SOPA/PIPA/TPP/ACTA & etc.

      You've really got to hand it to the MafiAA, they really figured out how to bend politicos to their will, and have been pressing that insight with all their might.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Be thankful, Kim. by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Add the invasion and occupation of the Dominican republic to ensure the dominance of US Sugar companies:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Dominican_Republic#United_States_occupation

      Again, its hardly a drop in the bucket. The US Government has a long history of invading other countries for the specific benefit of US Corporations. I would not be surprised to find out that most wars the US has been involved in were to benefit US companies in fact (there were exceptions yes I know. The US eventually got involved in WWI and WWII even if they were late to the table. Vietnam was political, the Korean war was similarly political (fighting communism) etc). Given the amount of money that simply disappeared (millions upon millions, on pallets of wrapped US dollars that just vanished) during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts plus the amount payed out exorbitantly to companies providing support to the US troops, I would argue those two wars were in large part for the benefit of US Oil and other companies (Blackwater and other contractors).
      This is no disparagement of US military forces - this is a disparagement of the governments that sent them to wherever for the benefit of private business interests.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  6. Whoops! by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Ah well, no harm done!

    I wonder if he will be able to sue the US government for the millions/billions lost in buisiness.

    1. Re:Whoops! by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if there were justice, he would be able to sue the .nz officials(who failed to do their duty), the fbi officials(who failed to do their duty) and the RIAA posse who misinformed those officials.

      and all customers should be able to too.

      in case someone is wondering, apparently the .nz officials failed to serve the company mega upload with a notice - a notice that would have probably allowed their lawyers to fight. furthermore it seems the intent of the american officials was to sue the individuals who had assets in megaupload for conspiracy instead of suing megaupload(it seems copyright violation is 4 years max in .nz, which wouldn't qualify for extradition - though even more likely is that the original real plan was just that dotcom would do a plea bargain.. ).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Whoops! by Kotoku · · Score: 1

      Not without appearing in U.S. court which I HIGHLY doubt he wants to do! Its a catch 22 that allows his business to be wrecked without recourse.

    3. Re:Whoops! by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      Wrong target. He needs to sue the New Zealand government since they were the ones that really allowed this to happen in the first place. If they'd been a little more circumspect about allowing the US to tell them what to do, or even told them to get stuffed and released Kim without charge as soon as the US started to blatently try to screw with due process, this farce wouldn't have got to the scale it has. While I personally think Kim is guilty as hell of the charges of willfully encouraging copyright infringement, if this leads to goverments being a little less willing to let the US extend its laws so far out of their jurisdiction in future then that's just great.

      Well, probably just great, because any cooling in legal co-operation will probably apply to other matters as well. It's going to look really good if they manage to miss bagging some criminal or terror kingpin because some foreign governement was double checking the paperwork to avoid another Kim Dotcom style mess.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Whoops! by mpe · · Score: 1

      in case someone is wondering, apparently the .nz officials failed to serve the company mega upload with a notice - a notice that would have probably allowed their lawyers to fight. furthermore it seems the intent of the american officials was to sue the individuals who had assets in megaupload for conspiracy instead of suing megaupload.

      Effectivly this appears to be a creative way of "piercing the corporate veil". I wonder if others, in both the US and NZ, will attempt this.
      If nothing else it appears to be a very effective technique of "corporate assassination"

    5. Re:Whoops! by symbolset · · Score: 1

      What they've done to him (kidnapping, imprisonment, theft) is a far bigger crime than he was accused of.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Whoops! by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      if there were justice, he would be able to sue the .nz officials(who failed to do their duty)...

      Speaking as a NZer, I don't think we can afford to pay him for his losses suffered! (I guess we can always borrow some more.)

      But yes, our police department and other agencies involved deserve to get in trouble for this.

    7. Re:Whoops! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      It's going to look really good if they manage to miss bagging some criminal or terror kingpin because some foreign governement was double checking the paperwork to avoid another Kim Dotcom style mess.

      (Emphasis added.) Surely the US government isn't going after themselves?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:Whoops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What might happen is that he goes in front of a .nz court with his demands of restitution for the damage he and his company sustained wins a judgment against the US goverment and then just hires some international repomen which then go and seize US govermental assets abroad.

    9. Re:Whoops! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      the .nz officials failed to serve the company mega upload with a notice

      Why should they? It's not their case but instead something imposed entirely from the outside with a lot of corners cut for expediency and little respect for the rule of law. It's a string of failures so the next thing would then trip things up. I think it was more of a hasty fishing expedition to get the guy and then charge him with something later than any serious attempt to try and convice him. I'm no lawyer but it looks very obvious.

    10. Re:Whoops! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      MegaUpload isn't a New Zealand company. We could only have served MegaStuff, which isn't even the operator of the site.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    11. Re:Whoops! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work like that. He'd then have to apply to a US Court to uphold the judgement (which the court would have to decide if it wants to do it in the particular case) and enforce it. He might still need to appear in front of a court for that, not sure if US courts allow remote representation via teleconference etc. In a perfect world, the US court being independent of the government would then find in his favour and enforce the judgement, but we know that wouldn't happen.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  7. FTFY by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1

    "These days, the US legal system simply has so much cruft, overbearing laws and process hindrances that simply the threat of getting arrested is enough to make you think about complying with whatever they want, getting arrested will give you perpetual problems in your life and getting convicted even if overturned later will make you an outcast."

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    1. Re:FTFY by guruevi · · Score: 2

      I've lived in both the US and the EU, although the US is bad and corrupt on the high level (the politicians), the EU is just as bad and the corruption is more spread out and gears towards the lower levels.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:FTFY by sjames · · Score: 1

      It seems NZ is more than willing to join in though.

  8. Seems Poetic by brit74 · · Score: 0

    > "has a few choice words to say about having his business trashed this way, with 220 jobs lost"
    While the legality of the move raises questions, I have to admit, there seems something poetic about someone who earned a fortune on ill-gotten, pirated material complaining about having his business trashed and jobs lost.

    1. Re:Seems Poetic by billcopc · · Score: 4, Informative

      The argument will always be that he merely offered a service that was in huge demand. What the users did with it cannot be blamed on the operator. At least, not when you stick to basic common sense and not U.S. protectionist copyright laws.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:Seems Poetic by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While the legality of the move raises questions, I have to admit, there seems something poetic about someone who earned a fortune on ill-gotten, pirated material complaining about having his business trashed and jobs lost.

      Yet who was it that claimed that Megaupload's principle use was copyright infringement? Megaupload had large numbers of law-abiding users, including people within the Justice department and even more ironically, within the entertainment industry. You might as well claim that ISPs are built on "ill-gotten, pirated material" -- after all, practically all downloading activity takes place on the Internet.

      An indictment is not a conviction, it is a preliminary accusation backed up with some amount of evidence. If indictments were conclusive, we would never need trials.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Seems Poetic by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yet who was it that claimed that Megaupload's principle use was copyright infringement?

      Anybody with an iota of common sense could tell that, long before they were raided.

    4. Re:Seems Poetic by X.25 · · Score: 1

      While the legality of the move raises questions, I have to admit, there seems something poetic about someone who earned a fortune on ill-gotten, pirated material complaining about having his business trashed and jobs lost.

      You really need to stop using that catchphrase.

      I think it would be obvious by now that there are many many people who did not use Mega for things you did.

      He earned his fortune by providing a really good service to customers. What the customers were doing, you can't know so stop assuming so much.

    5. Re:Seems Poetic by misexistentialist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Steve Jobs used to build telephone hacking equipment. The government should seize apple and give everyone free iPads!

    6. Re:Seems Poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the ends jutify the means now? Why should I have any respect beyond the reasonable fear of being shot or disappeared by my own governemnt , if they wont follow the law?

    7. Re:Seems Poetic by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You're assuming facts not in evidence. In a free country everybody gets a fair trial before we hang them.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Seems Poetic by Goaway · · Score: 1

      That would be a good counterargument if Steve Jobs was now selling boxes which were totally not for telephone hacking but everybody was using them for telephone hacking anyway.

    9. Re:Seems Poetic by BoberFett · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Seems Poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing Jobs with the other Steve, you know Mr Woz, the guy that actually built the stuff.

    11. Re:Seems Poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he used to build and sell "electronic music boxes" that incidentally could be used to phreak AT&T crappy phone system of the time.

    12. Re:Seems Poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Common sense isnt" -anonymous.

    13. Re:Seems Poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You appreciate that common sense is rather worthless, being that no party is able to actually prove the stsatement that the company was primarily used for infrginment, otherwise the lawyers would have this guy instead of him having them on the ropes.

      It seems sir that your common sense, if less common , would have informed you that it does not trump the rule of law, and that without some actual proof your statement amounts to nothing more than libel and slander.

    14. Re:Seems Poetic by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well apple is now selling cloud storage.

      come the next olympics there'll be lots of unauthorized pictures of the olympics shared through that, so it would be only fair that apple's entire premises would be raided, all accounts freezed and then tim cook could try to fight to keep the hardware from being trashed while the fbi tries to decide if they will actually try anyone in court.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:Seems Poetic by Goaway · · Score: 1

      If you are going to argue, please do so like an adult.

    16. Re:Seems Poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and give everyone free iPads!

      Will you be able to opt out? Or take a cash equivalent?

  9. Read the indictment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They will extradite him, he will be prosecuted in the USA, anyone who thinks otherwise should read the indictment it's damning.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/78786408/Mega-Indictment

    Fake take down notices, fake accounts to keep copyright material posted, instructions to ignore copyright takedowns not politically connected, money laundering. It's pretty damning stuff, so you can say "Megaupload wasn't given notice of server seizure" etc. but that won't stop a judge reading the indictment and extraditing him. 220 jobs lost? I'm wondering how many of those 220 will also end up behind bars after reading the indictment.

    1. Re:Read the indictment by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 2

      They will extradite him

      Yes, for copyright infringement. My heroes! The US, the world's police force, has saved us all from such a heinous criminal. Think of all the bits that they stopped from being copied! Totally worth all of this taxpayer money being wasted.

    2. Re:Read the indictment by Cederic · · Score: 1

      ffs, everything is 'money laundering' these days, if it involves suspected illegality and money.

      Meanwhile a US judge is suggesting that he wont get tried or extradited. So you're calling a US judge a liar. Dangerous ground indeed.

    3. Re:Read the indictment by green1 · · Score: 1

      The catch with the money laundering charge is that it hinges on the copyright infringement charge. Because if he's not guilty on the cpoyright infringement then the money he earned was earned legally, and hence the money laundering charge falls apart. so really if you can't prove the one, nothing else matters.

  10. Don't feel sorry for him or his business by kyrio · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't feel sorry for him or his business. He was knowingly running a warez hub. On top of that, he was running it as a for-profit warez distribution website. What his external marketing showed is meaningless compared to what actually occurred behind the scenes.

    I don't feel sorry for anyone who uploaded their only copy of their files to Megaupload, either. It's no one's issue but the uploader's if he was dumb enough to not have multiple physical backups of files that he definitely couldn't lose. Anyone dumb enough to also pay money to share their files on a site that is filled with ads also gets what's coming to him. There are at least 10 sites out there that provide you with a clean, easy to use and efficient service - even for free - for sharing files without any ads.

    This whole situation is just children, Brazilians and the mentally challenged just whining about not being able to get their warez, or losing a couple of dollars to a company that shut down and didn't give them a refund. I didn't see any cries from the people who lost hundreds or even thousands of dollars when Etology scammed every advertiser and publisher, last summer.

    1. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that even your government stored files there? Their only copies even?

      Then again, you mentioned the mentally retarded...

    2. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^This.
      You'd think if file sharing had no effect on the industry, the surely stopping the file sharing would also have no effect...

    3. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't feel sorry for him or his business

      The US government very likely didn't follow procedure, as we see here. Do you not see how dangerous this is to allow them to do as they please? Whatever you think of Kim and Megaupload, think of yourself and others first. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone. They can ruin anyone's business. That's not good.

      I don't feel sorry for anyone who uploaded their only copy of their files to Megaupload, either.

      Sorry that everyone isn't as technologically minded as you are.

      You know what's funny, though? While they may not have had an expectation that their data would stay there forever, I'm almost positive Megaupload would have informed them if they were going to legitimately shut down their website. That would give them time to get their files. But here, thanks to the US government, it was shut down instantly and without notice. Very nice.

      This whole situation is just children, Brazilians and the mentally challenged just whining about not being able to get their warez

      Uh... what about people with legitimate data hosted there? You even mentioned them in the above paragraph. I have a feeling they're "whining" about it, too. Probably whining that it's the US government's fault.

      Nice generalizations, though.

    4. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't feel sorry for him or his business. He was knowingly running a warez hub. On top of that, he was running it as a for-profit warez distribution website.

      This is Slashdot. He was shut down by a government (doesn't matter which). Therefore, your argument is invalid.

    5. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what you're saying is that you only get to complain if you lost more than a certain dollar amount. how...1% of you... I suppose we should just eliminate children, Brazilians and the mentally challenged too? Sieg Heil!

      you work for a *AA don't you?

    6. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He was knowingly running a warez hub

      Which was also used by the United States government, the recording industry, and an enormous number of other law abiding people.

      On top of that, he was running it as a for-profit warez distribution website

      So why are ISP operators not behind bars as well? What, do you really think that broadband service is not targeted at people who upload and download copyrighted material without permission? Let's not get caught up in external marketing here.

      This whole situation is just...

      ...a demonstration that due process of law, common sense, and technological progress are all killed the moment the copyright lobbyists start whining.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    7. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So why are ISP operators not behind bars as well?

      Probably has something to do with how ISPs don't pay people to upload copyrighted material to their servers.

    8. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Oakey · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, Usenet providers (who are mostly US operated companies by the look of it) continue unhindered. I wonder how many people are paying $20 a month to the likes of Giganews for 1000day binary retention, fast connections, etc for legitimate purposes?

      --
      "Dre don't get as high as me.... I'm Cheech and Chong" - Snoop Dogg
    9. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel sorry for you losing dollars when Etology shut down last summer *hug*

    10. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      First rule of usenet! Mod parent down.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Kim Dotcom may be able to escape criminal prosecution because of issues with extradition.

      However there is still the matter of civil and criminal claims against Megaupload.

      Given statutory damages it is highly unlikely Megaupload will ever exist as an operating entity in the US again.

    12. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I don't feel sorry for him, I feel sorry for the law.

    13. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't feel sorry for him or his business. He was knowingly running a warez hub. On top of that, he was running it as a for-profit warez distribution website. What his external marketing showed is meaningless compared to what actually occurred behind the scenes.

      I don't feel sorry for anyone who uploaded their only copy of their files to Megaupload, either. It's no one's issue but the uploader's if he was dumb enough to not have multiple physical backups of files that he definitely couldn't lose. Anyone dumb enough to also pay money to share their files on a site that is filled with ads also gets what's coming to him. There are at least 10 sites out there that provide you with a clean, easy to use and efficient service - even for free - for sharing files without any ads.

      This whole situation is just children, Brazilians and the mentally challenged just whining about not being able to get their warez, or losing a couple of dollars to a company that shut down and didn't give them a refund. I didn't see any cries from the people who lost hundreds or even thousands of dollars when Etology scammed every advertiser and publisher, last summer.

      This whole post is a huge straw man: the story here isn't about feelings of sorrow or otherwise. We hav a very clear (il)legal situation. Changing the topic in this fashion to raise tempers and mislead the attention of the readers - this is called trolling.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    14. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by green1 · · Score: 2

      But this is part of the point. They never did exist as an operating entity in the US in the first place.

    15. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by mpe · · Score: 1

      The US government very likely didn't follow procedure, as we see here. Do you not see how dangerous this is to allow them to do as they please? Whatever you think of Kim and Megaupload, think of yourself and others first. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone. They can ruin anyone's business. That's not good.

      In practice they are likely to be highly selective in doing this kind of thing. It's not like we will see Microsoft, Sony or even the MPAA "taken out" next week.

    16. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that they where a Hong Kong based company anyway.

    17. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm glad two wrongs make a right in your vew. If/when someone comes to shut your business Down or repossess your house, let's say similar statements about you too, "yeah, I knew him at highschool. He once took my lunch money - he's always been a bit dodgy, serves him right"

      Did you know Kim was working on a business called MegaBox that ensured artists got almost all of the profits, through direct distribution - that would bypass the MAFIAA.

      Of course you don't know, nor do you give a f*** because he deserved it, right?

    18. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      So why are ISP operators not behind bars as well?

      Probably has something to do with how ISPs don't pay people to upload copyrighted material to their servers.

      He didn't pay people to upload copyrighted material either. Why would he do that? It seems like a stupid way to make money!

      He had advertising on the website, which I understand that uploaders could get a cut of. But having advertising on a webpage isn't illegal.

    19. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... what about people with legitimate data hosted there?

      Well, of course we feel bad for both of them but them's the breaks.

    20. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Goaway · · Score: 1

      He didn't pay people to upload copyrighted material either.

      No, he did exactly that. Don't lie.

    21. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud you for pointing this out!

    22. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In practice they are likely to be highly selective in doing this kind of thing. It's not like we will see Microsoft, Sony or even the MPAA "taken out" next week.

      And this should make me feel better how?

      I should consider it a GOOD thing that justice *isn't* blind, and that if you're wealthy and well connected, the government will leave you alone - but if you're not, then evidence or not, you're screwed?

      Man, funny me, I thought this was one of the prime cases for revolution in 1776 - that the King and his well connected friends got preferential treatment while his enemies got whacked by the huge power of the government.

      I guess, you'd claim we shouldn't have bothered with that "revolution" thing - the system was working like it should all along.

      Sheesh

      -Greg

    23. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the average american would read your post like it was a good thing..

    24. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Megaupload leased servers in the US. That makes them an operating entity in the US.

    25. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Why would "MegaBox" matter? The entire idea of "almost all of the profits" is a lie and there are already multiple services out there for people to sign up to and sell their product on, keeping "almost all of the profits".

    26. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This whole situation is [...] Brazilians [...] just whining about not being able to get their warez

      Excuse me?

    27. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're excused.

    28. Re:Don't feel sorry for him or his business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't either. As someone who has known Kim personally since the early 90s, he is always skirting under the law time and time again. I was really hoping he'd learn his lesson eventually. The mans whole career is built on warez, credit card fraud, investment fraud, etc.

  11. Millions of legitimate users? by gnasher719 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Really? Millions of users who used megaupload for backups, or for distributing their own material and nothing else, _and_ who have no other copy of the data? Might the submitter be just slightly exaggerating?

    1. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      Really? Millions of users who used megaupload for backups, or for distributing their own material and nothing else, _and_ who have no other copy of the data? Might the submitter be just slightly exaggerating?

      Unlikely. Apparently, there were 15'000 premium accounts from the US army alone. Millions of legitimate users sounds quite reasonable. Also take into account that there is only so many movies and software that can be shared and music does not take a lot of space. Compare that with the size of the Megaupload storage and it sounds quite possible that the majority of data was actually legitimate. Of course, a major part of the Megaupload profits were from copyright infringement, but that is not the fault of the legitimate users.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Millions of users who used megaupload for backups, or for distributing their own material and nothing else, _and_ who have no other copy of the data?

      And why the "_and_ who have no other copy of the data"? If you used megaupload for backups, well, now you've lost access to your data for that purpose. If you used it to distribute your own material to others, well you've against lost access to your data for that purpose. Sure, you can setup a new backup service somewhere else, but that still means you've been inconvenienced and under questionable justification. Having said that...

      Might the submitter be just slightly exaggerating?

      And to this, I agree. I doubt megaupload itself had millions of users for backup and distribution (although I could be wrong). But, I don't doubt that megaupload and other similar services have lost millions of users for those purposes, due to the chilling knowledge that without even the ability to charge and extradite them under US law, they still can be shut down at will; hence, any free or semi-free service for file sharing or backup is now quick to tuck its tail and try to limit access and to make even legitimate access arduous enough that the pretext of "for the children^Wpiracy" will even be more clear, presuming that will protect them. So, there are those who are inconvenienced by the loss of megaupload directly and indirectly and further inconvenienced with the possible inability to find alternatives.

      Now, one could argue that such services inherently have the property that they'll be used by pirates, their owners will inherently be enriched by them, and hence such a market for free/semi-free file sharing shouldn't commercial exist--meanwhile, fully commercial and well filtered sites can remain because they have the resources to monitor and block offenders*. I am not quick to argue for that, however, as the same logic could be used for all sorts of free/semi-free services like photo sharing sites, email, etc. It's already enough of a poison pill that other, non-legal speech can be used to shut down services without adding yet another arm when it's even harder to qualify or quantify. After all, both sides can say whatever numbers they like, but we have no third party with either the ability or the desire to track down the users (both uploaders and downloaders) of sites like Megaupload; nor, am I aware, of efforts to do the same for photo sharing sites, email, etc, to have some base of comparison. But, then again, maybe we do have the scholarly work to back up one side or both in their assertions. That, to me, would be much more interesting and informative than hearing lawyers squabble over something that there seems to be no evidence for currently and might not exist.

      *Consider the situation with Youtube and Gema, and how difficult it is to reasonably find and block even repeat offenders, even if one wanted to. And consider the story of IOS being a safer market presumably because it's tied to accountability through credit cards; yet, Android has a similar setup with credit cards, so does that really help? Of course, that story is quite is unclear on what "policies that enforce accountability" mean and how viable it really is if you took credit cards or a similar cost/identification out of the equation; maybe they enforce accountability some other way. And for all we know, Megaupload had a similar policy in place as Apple. But even if they were "lax", even presuming that's how Google is, is there any real serious talk of legally holding Google as an accomplice in malware infections (or guilty of neglect) anymore than we could hold MS legally guilty for their platform being favored for the same? Of course, in the end, intent does enter into it. Ie, if Megaupload actually wanted for there to be copyright infringement... But, a policy of rewarding sharing on a site devoted to sharing being used to implicate Megaupload is absurd as seeing Youtube's (and hence Google's) po

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    3. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I actually would not be surprised if the number of "legitimate" (i.e. attempts at being law-abiding) users numbered in the millions. Megaupload provides a bunch of bandwidth and storage, so if you need to distribute gigabytes of data to multiple people it is a reasonable system to use. I have seen scientists using Megaupload and similar services to share data sets. The US Department of Justice used it, and there were members of the recording industry who used it. I have seen open source projects distributed on services like Megaupload, with links posted on forums to help provide more reliable downloads than the project's own servers (an ad-hoc sort of mirroring).

      Millions seems like a reasonable estimate to me.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      music does not take a lot of space. Compare that with the size of the Megaupload storage and it sounds quite possible that the majority of data was actually legitimate.

      Plausible, if by "legitimate" you mean porn.

    5. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, what?!

      "the majority of data was actually legitimate." and "a major part of the Megaupload profits were from copyright infringement," are mutually exclusive; as one becomes a majority the other has to become a minority, i.e. you can't have it both ways.

    6. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Megaupload profits were large, not a major part.

    7. Re:Millions of legitimate users? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not at all. There are some parameters you are missing here. There are profits associated with upload, storage and download. It is quite obvious how to have the major part of the data be legitimate and still have the major part of the profits come from illegitimate data. If you are a student of economics, drop the subject, you suck at it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. The IP Nazis made an "Example" of him by dryriver · · Score: 1

    The IP Nazis know that fighting a battle against the entire internet is difficult, costly and unpopular (not that they care the least bit about that last point). So they resort to a much cheaper, age-old, yet highly effective scare-tactic instead: Making "examples" of people. They try to identify high-profile Super-Nodes amongst the filesharers - like the guy who ran MegaUpload dot com. They then put into effect a "America will fuck you up bad regardless of where you may be in the World, pirate-boy" tactic. The message it sends to ordinary people is clear: "We don't care who you are. We don't care where you are. If you pirate our corporate IPs, we will land some law enforcement muscle in your location, and fuck you in the ass with an electrified baton". --------- This is one - probably illegal - way to fight against piracy. Unfortunately, it will eventually backfire on the MAFIAA's asses, and with it also on America. Everybody who watches movies or plays games these days is pretty aware that the quality of said products is going in one direction with each year that passes - down, down, and down more. Everybody knows that the people who produce this stuff don't give a shit about anything but profit, and that they are crooked enough to buy good reviews for bad produce. So eventually, sales of the latter will collapse not because people were pirating so much of it, but rather because people don't want to spend their hard-earned money on it anymore. Its time for functional alternatives to Hollywood and GameWood to arise. I personally believe that will actually happen eventually, when people discover that there are viable alternatives to U.S. made movies and games. As for Kim Dotcom... even if he's not extradited and sentenced to hard prison, people who run operations similar to his are scared of becoming "the next Kim Dotcom". ------- But scare strategies rarely work sattisfactorily in the long run. In the long run, the Movie and game industries will have to try to create a better product sold at a fair price (not the case currently). Or they will eventually face the same fate as MegaUpload - here and thriving today, gone and bankrupt(ed) tomorrow.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  13. Assange and dotcom by barv · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Heroes of the fight against control of information on the www.

    Legislators will use any excuse to put in place the mechanism of web censorship. Kiddie porn, terrorism, copyright theft; they are all excuses.

    What they want is the power to censor negative comment about themselves...

    1. Re:Assange and dotcom by tqk · · Score: 2

      What they want is the power to censor negative comment about themselves...

      "Plus ca change, ..."

      Even the Soviets couldn't do that, with threats of bullets in the back of heads. See what they couldn't stop no matter how hard they tried.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  14. millions? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    I really doubt that millions of people were more than slightly inconvenienced. Smart people didn't put their only copy of any data they thought was important there. A service like that is for backups and exchange with other users. Unless either you were stupid or list your original due to a crash, you can just re-upload to another service.

    Otherwise only Megaupload itself and Carpathian are really up a creek.

    1. Re:millions? by X.25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really doubt that millions of people were more than slightly inconvenienced. Smart people didn't put their only copy of any data they thought was important there. A service like that is for backups and exchange with other users. Unless either you were stupid or list your original due to a crash, you can just re-upload to another service.

      You are really silly.

      I had my whole photo album there (12GB or so of photos), uploaded over a very long period of time. Of course, it was not the only copy, but it was the copy which family/friends could always see.

      It did not require me to give any 'identifiable' details when creating an account, it doesn't really know who I am, I haven't been getting spam to email address which I've used for registration, it was extremely fast for everyone, it was much faster than other services I've tried, blah, blah, blah. I still have backups of my photos, but do you realize how long I'll have to upload them, on 512Kbit uplink, to another service? That won't happen.

      Can't you just accept that they were providing a good service? I'd rather pay them for premium account, than have it for free and have my data being sold to everyone who asks for it.

      There is not such thing as a free lunch.

      If you still don't understand what I am talking about, maybe this will help:

      http://verydemotivational.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/demotivational-posters-facebook-you.jpg

    2. Re:millions? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying they weren't providing a good service. I'm saying you were inconvenienced, slightly.

      You can upload your pictures to another service with a little effort. Mostly, that effort consists of creating another account on another service and telling your computer to upload THIS folder to the server. Then let it do its' thing. The heavy lifting is all automatic.

      But if you multiply that inconvenience by thousands or (as the claim is) millions of legit users, it amounts to a giant pain in the ass.

      But the intense pain is suffered only by Carpathia and MegaUpload.

  15. Straw man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody said that a Republican would do better, only that a Democrat did bad. Yes, they're both totally corrupt..

    1. Re:Straw man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True; they both are. And both houses of congress are stuck with silly games too. However, it is clear that one party wants to force their own religious mores onto everyone. Most people don't have any problem with people who hold differing views. But when they try to make those views into laws - yep, that's a problem. I can't vote for a party of religious thugs that want to control women, make birth control hard to obtain, make abortion illegal, and otherwise fuck things up. Other than that and the "small government" vs. "big government" the two parties are the same.

    2. Re:Straw man by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Neither party has given a shit about 'smaller government' for decades. Truth be told, they both love the idea of big government these days because they can stuff all their brothers in law into the bureaucracy and guarantee them jobs til they decide to take their bribes and retire. Plus, with compatible people in the bureaucracies, the regulations will be written to benefit the various party's plans. Course, it means regulation hell for the rest of us, but what the fuck, we ain't the 1%.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  16. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copyright infringement would be if he'd violated copyright. Read the indictment, he went so much further.

    1. Re:No by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it ultimately comes down to intellectual property nonsense. Even if it didn't, the US absolutely should not be involved.

  17. "completely" not necessay -corporatism's weak spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    completely cut off the flow of money to the entertainment industry

    There's no need to cut off the flow completely - just reduce it sufficiently.

    Doing that is simple. Here's the plan: It's not as tough as you believe.

  18. Less of a criminal than Hollywood + government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if he is a criminal, those "crimes" are all against bullshit laws created by a corrupt government fully paid for by a endemically corrupting film and entertainment industry.

    Compare the ill effects caused by one versus the other and MegaUpload is a saint. They don't give hundreds of thousands of our youngsters criminal records when all they want to do is share their culture.

    He's certainly profiting from it all, but when it comes to good versus bad and fighting against the Luddites in power, he's on the side of good.

  19. Re:For crying out loud by Cederic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may or may not. I don't know, and I can't tell because it hasn't gone to trial.

    What has happened is that someone's had their business disrupted, and their customers have had their personal data stolen from them, all without due process of the law.

    There has been a crime here, and even copyright infringers deserve a fair trial. Those trying to deny it to them need prosecuting.

  20. Re:For crying out loud by makomk · · Score: 1

    They only paid cash to people to upload files if they couldn't prove those files were copyright infringing; that's why they had all those spreadsheets identifying what the members of their revenue sharing scheme were uploading. This saved them quite a bit of money.

  21. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has happened is that someone's had their business disrupted, and their customers have had their personal data stolen from them, all without due process of the law.

    I think the best lesson to learn from this is not to keep only one copy of your data. What is the storage provider had lost power or the systems failed? Or a hacker wiped the data?

    I wonder how many businesses are still running without backups..wherever their data is stored.

  22. Re:Wah wah... by green1 · · Score: 1

    But you have no requirement that they actually do prove it? the allegation is sufficient for you? you're ok with the mere allegation of a crime being enough to ruin someone's entire life?

    Due process exists for a reason. If you don't care about it in one specific case, then you are willing to dismiss it in ALL cases, including ones you might find yourself in in the future.

  23. Re:For crying out loud by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    When you're the subject of a raid like this, it doesn't matter if you have backups. They take those too.

    If the above is the lesson learned, then anyone backing up their data needs to do it onto a server in a country which has no legal reciprocity with the US. In those cases, the US just uses the military instead of the judiciary.

  24. Lawsuit by J'raxis · · Score: 1

    Hopefully those "choice words" are only the beginning, and turn into an expensive lawsuit against the U.S. Government.

    1. Re:Lawsuit by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The American government doesn't have jurisdiction, I expect the local (federal) government will get sued.

  25. How much did this cost the DoJ? by RzTen1 · · Score: 1

    In actual money terms. I'm sure it's done quite a bit to harm both theirs and the US' reputation. I can't believe they would attempt to do something that they should already know they legally can't do. At least the lawsuits that will likely result from this should be a little interesting.

    I really wish the government was able to kick out incompetence before things got to the 'scandal' level. It always seems like they're reacting to the latest disaster instead of preventing it from happening.

  26. The evil empire strikes again! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Millions/Billions of $ lost, tens of thousands dead, all for the profit of the mega corporations that control the whores on Capitol Hill!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  27. Re:Wah wah... by Cito · · Score: 1

    They do not have proof, they just made claims and lies to sweeten the charges.

    There is and has never been any proof other than false allegations and bullshit lies from the government to try and help sweeten the charges. RIAA has already been proven many many many times to falsify and even make up evidence to help their cause.

  28. Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States

    Kiwi is located in the range of the US NAVY and that is the only thing that matters. How many battalioons NZ has? Kindly remind everyone that NZ no longer has an air force, since it's late 1990s leftish gov't decided to spend the F-16 acquisition earmarked money on welfare. NZ is sitting duck to the brave eagle!

    Judges speak too much and cite paragraphs and behave like they, mere appointed ones, are above popular vote elected officials. Luckily that matters none, because of realpolitik. USA can effectively sell NZ to the chinese any minute, who would simply love to have such a backdoor unsinkable aircraft carrier in the soft belly of their arch-enemy Australia. (PRC wants all the minerals in aussie ground.)

    NZ better behave and abide whatever Uncle Sam asks. Chinese communists would simply give that mega-baby Kim Schmitz a shot in the back of the head, not a even a trial. Uncle Sam is merciful, he will only get 144 years in Florence.

    1. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiiight, because if anything, New Zealand is known for obeying the US's every whim.

  29. Re:Millions left w/o access to their legitimate da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were to look at how much of the modding community used either megaupload, rapidshare, or a few other major 'piracy' file sharing sites, you might be surprised. While I have no doubt there was a lot of pirated material on megaupload, I will almost guarantee you due to deduplication that it was 100:1 links to illegal files and 1:1000 illegal links to legitimate files. Why? Because there are thousands of one off files out there that nobody can afford to host, but that which didn't fit on another site due to licensing (example being most mods can't go up on github/sourceforge/etc because very few people license their art assets CC. Some because they're sloppy and made them derivative of the game they're modding, some because they DID pilfer them from a DIFFERENT game, and some just because they think their artwork is 'special'.) Point being, a lot of those types of files didn't really have anywhere else to go for a number of years. Nowadays you can post them on skydrive, or dropbox or a dozen other places, but when MU first popped up most of the old methods of putting files up were going away (mostly due to lack of revenue and cost of bandwidth.)

  30. Re:For crying out loud by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    Because your backups are always kept with the servers, right?

        You're suppose to keep a set of backups locally, in case they need to be restored on the spot. Those would have been seized.

        You're suppose to keep another set of backups off-site, somewhere safe. If that's with a 3rd party business (like Iron Mountain); a safety deposit box at a nearby bank; or even a safe in a secure warehouse, it doesn't really matter as long as it isn't close by. You have to keep it far enough away so if a catastrophic local event happens, you don't lose everything.

        If I remember right, he lost control of the servers, and his bank accounts were frozen. He also had thousands of servers, and hundreds of people employed. So, he couldn't use his servers. He couldn't buy or lease new servers. He couldn't even pay the staff. I'm sure there were a few die-hard individuals who would have stayed to help, to ensure their future employment with him. The hard part is getting new servers setup and racked. That's far from an overnight proposition, and impossible with no funds.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  31. Re:For crying out loud by tqk · · Score: 1

    Use your time to work on something meaningful, not whining about your tragic lost warez website.

    I'd never heard of Megaupload before this brouhaha blew out into the open. Nor am I a "pirate" (I advocate boycotting **AA crap), nor do I think I actually like K. Dotcom. Regardless, even I can see lots of stink in this mess, and most of that's on the prosecution's side, not MU's.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  32. bad hero by Tom · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I feel sorry for the crowd here when someone as sleazy as Kim gets lauded as a hero. The guy is a known crook, despised by everyone with a clue, and he is absolutely not the kind of sleazebag you want to root for. Don't fall into that trap.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:bad hero by Terrasque · · Score: 1

      Well, if he's the good guy, what does that tell you about the bad guys?

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    2. Re:bad hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is the bad guy, genius, only downside is that he isn't going to get what should be coming to him.

    3. Re:bad hero by X.25 · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for the crowd here when someone as sleazy as Kim gets lauded as a hero. The guy is a known crook, despised by everyone with a clue, and he is absolutely not the kind of sleazebag you want to root for. Don't fall into that trap.

      He stole your lunch money once, too?

    4. Re:bad hero by Tom · · Score: 1

      You need a lot less Hollywood and a lot more real in your life.

      More often than not, there are two bad guys. Or two good guys. Or it's all too complicated to really tell the difference, because everyone always thinks they are the good guys.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:bad hero by Tom · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, if there was any content or information in your reply, you forgot to actually include it.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:bad hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell by your number you're too old to be here any more. You don't see any content or information in the post because you have Alzheimers, you old goat.... ;-}

  33. War on porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ever wonder if the US government could wage a war on porn, this is enough proof that they could make a large dent. Given that some right wingers and their candidates would be OK with that, it is a little scary. I'm shocked that Obama did this illegal act by directing a foreign police force to go after someone who hasn't killed any Americans.

    Anyways, at first, they will just make you opt-in to the full Internet, then they will make that list public, and then raid businesses and server farms, and then go after individuals...

  34. Steve Jackson Games--deja vu? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    Maybe the feds should think a little more carefully the next time the MPAA lawyers and investigators try to seduce them with a new case?

  35. Re:For crying out loud by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    Because your backups are always kept with the servers, right?

    In the case of evidentiary seizure, it is irrelevant where they're kept unless they're in a jurisdiction untouchable by the US judiciary. There aren't many of those, and using one to store backups is probably just this side of impossible to accomplish realistically with the scale of data we're talking about.

  36. Oh, what BS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's why we Americans have the second amendment."

    Like you're gonna take up a gun and kill the executive management of RIAA and MPAA?

    You can't even find your way out of your parents' basement.

  37. International Court of Justice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand the US Feds won't allow themselves to be sued (Tort Claims Act notwithstanding). How does this work with respect to international courts? Can K Dotcom sue in those venues?

  38. the US has NZ gimped out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunate to hear. I'm looking to emigrate from the US, largely due to the accelerating erosion of civil rights here. I have the money to go anywhere that has preferential treatment for rich people, as does NZ. NZ was near the top of my list, and I think I need to re-evaluate.

  39. For the first time by hengist · · Score: 1

    in almost 39 years on this planet, I'm ashamed to be a New Zealander.

  40. The money by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    The fundamental problem with American politics is you can't get elected without big bags of money. Without the corporate payoff you can't play. You solve that problem and you eliminate big business buying off your government (because politicians won't take orders from anyone if they can avoid it).

  41. Typo - try and "convict" by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Whoops

  42. By who? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Just as then, Jews are now increasingly being blamed for all the ills caused by the political leaders of their own political parties & nations

    Mel Gibson? Anyone who goes down that road quickly gets (rightfully) lambasted by the media. Now if you wanted to talk about Arabs instead of Jews, you might have a point about increased persecution and segregation.

  43. Re:For crying out loud by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        Well, the "untouchable" portion is really up to how much he divulged.

        In this case, I don't think they're goin gto try too hard to track down every backup that may be stored anywhere.

        With the bandwidth that I'm sure he was using he could have used a system such as disk to disk over the Internet first, then disk to tape at each facility.

        He was bringing in enough money to be able to afford all kinds of neat features, like redundant datacenters, and paying a guy to go collect the tapes from the jukebox once a week. Having a site in the US, Canada, Germany, Argentina, and China (random places off the top of my head), would have provided for the ability to get the site back up, regardless of what may be seized in any single country. Unless there was a massive coordinated effort for the shutdown, someone's going to walk away with the data, even if it's kept in some friend's garage in a box marked "1976 tax papers"

        The difference between you, I, and him is that he was making a boatload of money at it, so it's a pretty good idea to pay for good precautions. I have to assume that he had at least one person mention "disaster recovery" to him...
       

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  44. Can you kiddies say LAWSUIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be willing to bet a million vs a doughnut he is going to sue the us justice dept and WIN HUGE. That's what we get for letting corporate america drive our law enforcement divisions to do stupid stuff and then we people have to pay for it. I say whoever the group is that made the claim and forced the issue should have to pay for it. Once again if corporate america thinks someone is stealing from them via copyright infringement then LET THEM INVESTIGATE, GATHER EVIDENCE AND THEN SUE for their money, DO NOT INVOLVE MY TAX DOLLARS for your BUL***T. Oh yeah and what about all of the legitimate business and customers that had legally stored data for their business and personal affairs, YES They are gonna sue as well. The EVIL AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM SHUT THEM DOWN WITHOUT DUE JUSTICE OR PROCESS.

  45. Jurisdiction of the United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States
     
        That's rather strange coming from a US judge since this type of silly "jurisdiction" thing has not stopped the US before.

  46. Ron Paul = 1880s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ron Paul's policies are straight out of the 1880s and they were a failure then. That's why we have the Progressiveness.

  47. Re:For crying out loud by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Ever hear of something called "due process"? Even the Nazis got trials, and they were accused of things which few if any would dispute should actually *be* considered crimes.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  48. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don' worry, you're shut down now, dickhead.