The site tries to show that 2 wrongs do not make a right. But the advertisment on the page was for unlimited downloading of songs and movies, a clear copyright "wrong".
It sounds like it is time for the land line providers to follow the cell companies, start requiring a contract for a minimum time frame with large penalties for changing early.
Corporate America does get it, they are selling the rope and legislate that it can't be used to hang their profits.
The war was lost due to the lack of a bit
Slashdot Mirror
The site tries to show that 2 wrongs do not make a right. But the advertisment on the page was for unlimited downloading of songs and movies, a clear copyright "wrong".
The corrected statement is The copyright owner must be compensated. The song writters might or might not be the copyright owner.
Isn't the question to ask, when will people get the support of their elected rep's to change the law.
A bad law today is a terrible law tomorrow
One market would be Virus writers and gov. spooks. Instead of modifying the OS, change the processor instructions.
Through the profit margin would be slim.
It sounds like it is time for the land line providers to follow the cell companies, start requiring a contract for a minimum time frame with large penalties for changing early.
Corporate America does get it, they are selling the rope and legislate that it can't be used to hang their profits. The war was lost due to the lack of a bit