Slashdot Mirror


User: gobbles

gobbles's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:FP! on File Sharing: Decentralizing, Open-Source Fasttrack · · Score: 1
    wow that's a lot of words wasted!

    here's a one-liner that shows that muslims don't really have a monopoly on evil:

    here you go

  2. Re:fortran version? on Intel Announces Free Linux Compilers · · Score: 1

    It supports fortran 90, don't know about F95. But I gotta tell you, stay away from fortran! Such a broken, horribly deprecated language that no longer serves any useful purpose!

  3. Re:Performance gains. on Intel Announces Free Linux Compilers · · Score: 1
    Actually, Intel never made such performance claims - I did. But on worthwhile benchmarks such as SPECcpu2000, gains of over _100%_ can be had, on the Itanium platform.

    Seriously, you have no idea just how bad GCC/G++/G77 can be.

    Of course, if your application is I/O limited or somesuch, sure, the Intel compiler won't help much (if at all) but for stuff that's reasonably CPU-bound, it does a good job.

  4. Re:what about gcc? on Intel Announces Free Linux Compilers · · Score: 1
    Actually, some Intel (and HP, etc) employees were at a fairly recent "GCC IA64 summit" discussing ways in which GCC on IA64 hardware might be improved (it is by far the "worst case" - people are already getting fairly decent speedups in experimental GCCs with P3/P4 support)

    The unfortunate truth is that the Intel compiler isn't entirely theirs to sell (or at least 'open up' for GCC to consume) - the front end is an Edinburgh Portable Compilers' one (hope I spelt that right) and the back end could never be worked into GCC without tearing it (GCC) up completely, and reimplementing the whole thing...

    Free beer isn't bad, if it quenches your thirst ;)