I do not believe that ISPs are violation of Net Neutrality by supporting restoring regulations that had been in place.The smaller ISPs I work with are holding back on build-out due to regulatory concerns associated with Title 2. It adds burdens to them, and is squishy and open to interpretation that changes with each questionable bureaucrat. Leaving Title 2 regulation in place is actually helping the large ISPs by motivating smaller ISPs to stop growth, sell out, or shutter completely. Title 2 does make it easier for the government to access your Internet traffic, though. It's almost like politicians are calling it a repeal of Net Neutrality to get people worked up to keep that easier access in place - but they wouldn't do that, would they?
Slashdot Mirror
I do not believe that ISPs are violation of Net Neutrality by supporting restoring regulations that had been in place.The smaller ISPs I work with are holding back on build-out due to regulatory concerns associated with Title 2. It adds burdens to them, and is squishy and open to interpretation that changes with each questionable bureaucrat. Leaving Title 2 regulation in place is actually helping the large ISPs by motivating smaller ISPs to stop growth, sell out, or shutter completely. Title 2 does make it easier for the government to access your Internet traffic, though. It's almost like politicians are calling it a repeal of Net Neutrality to get people worked up to keep that easier access in place - but they wouldn't do that, would they?