It comes packaged with the windows Ruby install, but supports *lots* of different languages. Code Hiliting is very nicely done, including code collapsing, etc. Not too much other crap in it though.
It's like when you and your buddy are scuba diving and a shark is chasing you. You don't have to outrun the shark, just your buddy.
So it doesn't matter if it can outrun Godzilla, just as long as it's faster than the train next to it.
I've been on the MS side of development for the past 6 years..NET is paying my mortgage. I have a wife and 2 kids who eat food bought with.NET money.
I would never buy a car based on MS technology.
If I found out the ones I already own contain MS technology, I would sell them.
I'll trust fairly sensitive data -- taxes, SSN, credit cards, etc. -- to be stored on MS based technology. Which is somewhat crazy in itself.
But I would never trust my life to it.
I have seen first-hand what MS source code looks like. Not horrible (relatively), but certainly on the level of application code -- definitely not mission-critical code.
MSN Search actually funds Internet Explorer. With MSN Search getting over 30 hits / day, the ad revenue is more than enough to sustain active development, including the revolutionary "tabbed browsing" internet surfers everywhere are pining to try out.
I've always wanted an offsite backup for my sentimental data, such as family pics and recordings of karaoke. I'm sure other people want this too--anybody know of a "backup buddy" type of service, where you keep backups for other people, whilst they keep backups for you? That way if your house does burn down / computer stolen / etc, you would still have your sentimental data.
I mean, nowadays, who hasn't got a few gigs to spare? Plus there could be a requirement that you can only have others backup as much as your are backing up for others.
Kind of a bit torrent idea, but not quite.
The 10 finger interface is the only way to be completely secure. You don't even need any network hardware, such as NICs, hubs, etc. And it's completely wireless.
Downside is its throughput--depending upon your "config", it can vary widely.
Re:Why the towers collapsed
on
More WTC News
·
· Score: 0
That is the best sig I've seen in awhile. Sweet.
Terrorism = Cancer
on
More WTC News
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
All terrorists believe their cause is more important than human life--including their own. The way America can eradicate terrorism is by eliminating their cause. That is the whole issue everybody is debating--how to respond. I am not a religious person, but the further loss of human life does not appeal to me. However, I believe that all other avenues have already been persued.
There is no cure for cancer, but there are treatments. These treatments affect not only the bad cells but some of the good cells as well--for the benefit of the whole. I believe it is time to treat that cancer for the benefit of the whole--even though it means taking some of the good with it.
The world will never be united. There will always be difference of opinion--that is what America was built upon.
The United States will always be "above" terrorism simply because we give everybody the benefit of the doubt. The WTC debacle removed any doubt that lingered--we must retaliate with force, and with overwhelmingly superior force. Nuclear weapons have always been a last resort; I don't think we're quite there yet.
So let's just take over the MiddleEast, steal all their oil, weapons, and make them take showers. Then let's give 'em the finger when they leave.
Slashdot Mirror
Related to the Apple switch? Anyone?
Have you ever tried SciTE?
http://www.scintilla.org/It comes packaged with the windows Ruby install, but supports *lots* of different languages. Code Hiliting is very nicely done, including code collapsing, etc. Not too much other crap in it though.
It's like when you and your buddy are scuba diving and a shark is chasing you. You don't have to outrun the shark, just your buddy.
So it doesn't matter if it can outrun Godzilla, just as long as it's faster than the train next to it.
I've been on the MS side of development for the past 6 years. .NET is paying my mortgage. I have a wife and 2 kids who eat food bought with .NET money.
I would never buy a car based on MS technology.
If I found out the ones I already own contain MS technology, I would sell them.
I'll trust fairly sensitive data -- taxes, SSN, credit cards, etc. -- to be stored on MS based technology. Which is somewhat crazy in itself.
But I would never trust my life to it.
I have seen first-hand what MS source code looks like. Not horrible (relatively), but certainly on the level of application code -- definitely not mission-critical code.
http://www.google.com/googlegulp/
MSN Search actually funds Internet Explorer. With MSN Search getting over 30 hits / day, the ad revenue is more than enough to sustain active development, including the revolutionary "tabbed browsing" internet surfers everywhere are pining to try out.
I've always wanted an offsite backup for my sentimental data, such as family pics and recordings of karaoke. I'm sure other people want this too--anybody know of a "backup buddy" type of service, where you keep backups for other people, whilst they keep backups for you? That way if your house does burn down / computer stolen / etc, you would still have your sentimental data.
I mean, nowadays, who hasn't got a few gigs to spare? Plus there could be a requirement that you can only have others backup as much as your are backing up for others. Kind of a bit torrent idea, but not quite.
The 10 finger interface is the only way to be completely secure. You don't even need any network hardware, such as NICs, hubs, etc. And it's completely wireless.
Downside is its throughput--depending upon your "config", it can vary widely.
That is the best sig I've seen in awhile. Sweet.
All terrorists believe their cause is more important than human life--including their own. The way America can eradicate terrorism is by eliminating their cause. That is the whole issue everybody is debating--how to respond. I am not a religious person, but the further loss of human life does not appeal to me. However, I believe that all other avenues have already been persued. There is no cure for cancer, but there are treatments. These treatments affect not only the bad cells but some of the good cells as well--for the benefit of the whole. I believe it is time to treat that cancer for the benefit of the whole--even though it means taking some of the good with it. The world will never be united. There will always be difference of opinion--that is what America was built upon. The United States will always be "above" terrorism simply because we give everybody the benefit of the doubt. The WTC debacle removed any doubt that lingered--we must retaliate with force, and with overwhelmingly superior force. Nuclear weapons have always been a last resort; I don't think we're quite there yet. So let's just take over the MiddleEast, steal all their oil, weapons, and make them take showers. Then let's give 'em the finger when they leave.