Although it's probably just a small subset of what you're looking for, Project Guttenburg is a database of books which are out of copywrite. Since it only contains books out of copywrite, it is able to give you the book contents as well. Not useful for looking up the NY Times bestseller list, but if you need to look up something from The Art of War or Macbeth, see http://promo.net/pg/ and download the whole book as a text file.
From article:
Sanders contended it would be too expensive for companies like AMD to "create products for multiple, inconsistent versions of Windows."
who creates a cpu for a specific version of an os? sounds a bit like a construction company worring about troubles of making houses around "multiple, inconsistent versions of furnature."
let's take a closer look. does this prove that microsoft has, in the past, dictated specific x86 features? it must if amd now complains that multiple versions of windows will be a hardship for them in this way. it shouldn't be a hardship for amd because they should just be able to build the chip and release the instruction set. it's only a hardship if the court order for microsoft will make them turn around and make impossible demands on amd. right? is there any other conclusion?
From article:
Sanders contended it would be too expensive for companies like AMD to "create products for multiple, inconsistent versions of Windows."
who creates a cpu for a specific version of an os? sounds a bit like a construction company worring about troubles of making houses around "multiple, inconsistent versions of furnature."
let's take a closer look. does this prove that microsoft has, in the past, dictated specific x86 features? it must if amd now complains that multiple versions of windows will be a hardship for them in this way. it shouldn't be a hardship for amd because they should just be able to build the chip and release the instruction set. it's only a hardship if the court order for microsoft will make them turn around and make impossible demands on amd. right? is there any other conclusion?
"Microsoft's development of reliable and scalable server operating systems has enabled AMD to enter and compete more effectively in the server businesses...because most non-Microsoft server operating systems only run on specialized microprocessors," he [Jerry Sanders, AMD CEO] testified.
HAAAAA-HAAAA HA! HA! HAAAAAAA!! HA hahahahahaha haaaaaaa!!!!!
too bad you can't get IN to the way out. quite amusing--the switch from apache to iis and it takes less than a day for their site to go down. looks like the way out has crashed.
Slashdot Mirror
Although it's probably just a small subset of what you're looking for, Project Guttenburg is a database of books which are out of copywrite. Since it only contains books out of copywrite, it is able to give you the book contents as well. Not useful for looking up the NY Times bestseller list, but if you need to look up something from The Art of War or Macbeth, see http://promo.net/pg/ and download the whole book as a text file.
From article:
Sanders contended it would be too expensive for companies like AMD to "create products for multiple, inconsistent versions of Windows."
who creates a cpu for a specific version of an os? sounds a bit like a construction company worring about troubles of making houses around "multiple, inconsistent versions of furnature."
let's take a closer look. does this prove that microsoft has, in the past, dictated specific x86 features? it must if amd now complains that multiple versions of windows will be a hardship for them in this way. it shouldn't be a hardship for amd because they should just be able to build the chip and release the instruction set. it's only a hardship if the court order for microsoft will make them turn around and make impossible demands on amd. right? is there any other conclusion?
From article:
Sanders contended it would be too expensive for companies like AMD to "create products for multiple, inconsistent versions of Windows."
who creates a cpu for a specific version of an os? sounds a bit like a construction company worring about troubles of making houses around "multiple, inconsistent versions of furnature."
let's take a closer look. does this prove that microsoft has, in the past, dictated specific x86 features? it must if amd now complains that multiple versions of windows will be a hardship for them in this way. it shouldn't be a hardship for amd because they should just be able to build the chip and release the instruction set. it's only a hardship if the court order for microsoft will make them turn around and make impossible demands on amd. right? is there any other conclusion?
This is just too easy...
"Microsoft's development of reliable and scalable server operating systems has enabled AMD to enter and compete more effectively in the server businesses...because most non-Microsoft server operating systems only run on specialized microprocessors," he [Jerry Sanders, AMD CEO] testified.
HAAAAA-HAAAA HA! HA! HAAAAAAA!! HA hahahahahaha haaaaaaa!!!!!
lynx www.wehavethewayout.com
results in...
Alert!: HTTP/1.1 403 Access Forbidden
too bad you can't get IN to the way out. quite amusing--the switch from apache to iis and it takes less than a day for their site to go down. looks like the way out has crashed.