Slashdot Mirror


User: Daengbo

Daengbo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,721
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,721

  1. Re:Dead on. on Is Mark Zuckerberg the Next Steve Case? · · Score: 1

    You're right about Rushkoff's ardument, of course, but he's completely wrong: Facebook isn't easy to switch off from. Fabebook of 2010 (2011) is the MS Windows of 2000. "Everyone's" on it. Their data is locked up there without any real way to get it out. The rest of the web is FB-friendly. Most importantly, though there are feasible, workable alternatives, the vast majority of FB users don't know about these other options and wouldn't switch even if they knew, because the options aren't demonstrably better in any sense they care about. Just like MS Windows, and we know how that turned out.

    It'll be a long time before we see TNT.

  2. Re:Dead on. on Is Mark Zuckerberg the Next Steve Case? · · Score: 1

    I think they call that Satatus.Net.

  3. Re:The South Korean Government is no fan of Google on Google Broke the Law, Say South Korean Police · · Score: 1

    BS on the entire post. The identity laws were a knee-jerk response to the suicide of a popular actress after the kind of flap that is common in western tabloids. Instead of using it as a talking point to promote discussion about how suicide isn't the appropriate response to ... well ... anything, the politicians instead pushed through legislation they'd wanted to pass for years in order to chill free speech like the anonymous, amateur Korean economist that was putting the government to shame.

    In short, it's the story of the PATRIOT Act, but in Korea.

  4. Re:What's next? on Man Arrested For Exploiting Error In Slot Machines · · Score: 1

    Thanks

  5. Re:What's next? on Man Arrested For Exploiting Error In Slot Machines · · Score: 5, Informative

    The only way to win is to not play.

  6. Re:double standard on Man Arrested For Exploiting Error In Slot Machines · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The house always wins. Duh!

  7. Re:Damn linux users! on The Challenge In Delivering Open Source GPU Drivers · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to argue with you: I'll just point out that the devs in question have said they messed up and will do better about having code out and backported for Ivy Bridge.

    No, this is our job, and we blew it for Sandy Bridge. We're supposed to do development well ahead of product release, and make sure distros include the necessary code to get things working (we have separate teams to do development and aid distros in backporting, though most of them can handle it by themselves these days).

  8. Re:Broken? on Google's Next Challenge, Spam Results · · Score: 1

    Yes, everyone uses it. I was responding to:

    One of many search engine features I can think of, but have never seen implemented, would be to treat different grammatical forms as rough synonyms. It's a little irritating to have to run a nearly identical search multiple times, once on a term like "indexes" and again on "indicies" and again on "indexing".

  9. Re:So get a killer app on The Challenge In Delivering Open Source GPU Drivers · · Score: 1

    Except that Intel is behind MeeGo so you would think they'd want their hardware well-supported.

  10. Re:Damn linux users! on The Challenge In Delivering Open Source GPU Drivers · · Score: 1

    "The challenge" being issued here is to start contributing working code to the relevant projects as soon as possible and well in advance of D-day, so that drivers for the hardware are already available and inccluded in mainstream, current distros on launch day. Instead, what we get is support six months to a year after launch, if ever.

    For a nice contrast, look at how IA64 and USB3 were supported in the Linux kernel before commercial products became available.

  11. Re:Broken? on Google's Next Challenge, Spam Results · · Score: 1

    These are called "stems" and Google uses them extensively.

  12. Number of components, not computing power on 45 Years Later, Does Moore's Law Still Hold True? · · Score: 2

    Number of components, not computing power, and the time-frame should be easy to figure out given the difference between 1965's number and the 65,000 predicted in 1975.

  13. Re:Their own bottom line... on Google Pushes Openness Over Rooting · · Score: 1

    Reread my statement and reconsider your knee-jerk anti-Americanism in light of my own. :P (i.e. Yeah, that's exactly what I meant -- notice I said "once the US standardizes," not "once the world standardizes.")

  14. Re:Their own bottom line... on Google Pushes Openness Over Rooting · · Score: 1

    That statement will begin to be true once the US has standardized on a cellular technology.

  15. Re:Suggestion: on Google Pushes Openness Over Rooting · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think Google should go with cellular, but instead offer free ubiquitous WiFi and promote VoiP. Set up a Google Voice account and you're good. They have the fiber. They have the tech. Google doesn't want to get in that business, but if the net starts Balkanizing, I bet they'd do it.

  16. Re:They only need enough drivers on Microsoft Ready To Talk Windows On ARM · · Score: 1

    And yet when you read tech blog comments on Chrome OS, the turfing is all about drivers and whether your digital camera is going to work.

  17. Re:You could just do what I do on Passwords Are the Weakest Link In Online Security · · Score: 1

    You joke, but my bank doesn't allow special characters, and my last ISP required all lowercase for passwords. Ugh!

  18. Re:maybe we should have some other method of authe on Passwords Are the Weakest Link In Online Security · · Score: 2

    This is why we should be having real discussions about standardizing on better authentication methods (OAuth, etc.) and multi-step auth instead passwords. I personally think password + hardware (phone / SD / etc.) + retina scan would be a good base to run an auth server off of. I also think identity should be in the browser (see sig).

  19. Re:First Post on Oregon To Let Students Use Spell Check on State Exams · · Score: 1

    Let's get over it. Students should have access to the same tools on tests, especially high-stakes tests, that they have access to in regular classrooms. Spelling suggestions won't help anyone. Calculators should be allowed on math tests, too: the tests should be written so that these tools don't actually help. -- ps. I'm over 40

  20. Re:Geeky devices on Google TV Suffers Setback · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When all the major networks ban your TV product, it's pretty much destined to fail.

  21. Re:Increased IT literacy??? on Why Android Is the New Windows · · Score: 2

    My Model I is crying in the corner now. It's OK, baby. You were my first and I'll never forget you ....

  22. Re:mobile platform on Why Android Is the New Windows · · Score: 1

    I really don't get how Applites buy in with such fervor to Apple's success, despite having nothing to do with it. It reminds me of Microsofties in the late 90's being so proud of BG for being the richest businessman in the world.

  23. Re:Should have deleted it from the start on Google Declines To Turn Over Harvested Wi-Fi Data · · Score: 1

    This isn't the USAG -- it's Connecticut's. That's why.

  24. Re:Look at it from the other side. on Finding Independently Produced TV Shows? · · Score: 1

    Fringr, Lost, The Event. These are all huge shows that I'm aware of, and I don'y really watch TV much. There was also that show about the multi-planet mission that got canceled last year.

  25. Re:Um, we're broke? on 'YouCut' Targets National Science Foundation Budget · · Score: 1

    1) Declare bankruptcy as a nation
    2) Cut virtually everything from the budget and law books
    3) Fully fund seventeen years of optional education for every citizen
    4) Given a generation to work through the chaos, profit!