Much of the economic wealth of the US in the 19th century came from the natural resources that were not yet exploited and the ability to exploit them and people without too many repercussions. As stated above, your a fool. Read a little about the lumber wealth of the new world for some insight into this topic.
When you say "edge case" you really show your true background. It must be nice to have been born into affluence. Are you that 27 year old millionaire that was on Yahoo finance?
The real problem with capitalism, is that it values capital more then labor, much more. That's what screws people in our system. You are stealing a little time and labor from alot of people to build the capital, and there is nothing they can do about it because capital has the power.
As one of the people, I prefer people have the power, not capital.
Your approach is madness. Charity orphanages would be perfect for oil field workers. We gave you 18 years, you give us 18 years, sounds fair, but it's slavery.
Also, how many jobs in todays economy go to someone who knows someone, that's the way of the world and it only gets worse and quickly spirals into fuedalism in your scenario.
Judging from my anecdotal evidence, your correct; All of these people who say "awesome, because, cloud" -- well, I have yet to be convinced that any of these vendors can provide as much uptime and reliability as a decent IT department.
Unfortunately, also from my anecdotal evidence, decent IT departments are few and far between. Budget constraints have gutted them and few are willing to pay the premium for a good admin. They prefer to hire an "entry level" admin and set their salaries accordingly. That's why I have moved from Win to Lin. They wheat to chaff admin ratio is much better.
Interestingly enough, and unknown to many people, some state and local government agencies were not bound by those rules. They still might not be. You could switch to a job at a state agency and get caught with the pre-existing condition clause.
You don't sound very well informed, the system is definitely hard to get into without insurance or private pay. Even with those there are the difficulties you mention.
When they double them without offering any additional value
Orange is the New Black, Hemlock Grove, Disney movies, almost every show on Cartoon Network, every hit show from the cable providers (Breaking Bad, Walking Dead, etc)
All added since the price increase, which I think was mostly to discourage dvd customers, since they want out of that market.
I think there were alot of Netflix early adopters that essentially want everything to be available, they won't be happy with less. I am one of the later adopters who grabbed it for the value. Essentially any show worth watching shows up on Netflix. There is some delay, but with their deep catalog I can always find something to watch. It's also about 1/10th the price of cable, more like 1/15th.
About to hit 42 myself and completely agree. And we were thought to be completely rotten teens by adults.... today's kids make us look like genius saints. -said every 42 year old in history...
Unfortunately, this discussion won't make it to the supreme court for clarification, so we can only look at existing decisions and say they are settled, because they are settled. That's what the court does, it verifies that the law is being implemented correctly based on what was written.
If I had a nickel for everytime I assumed "right thing" was happening only to get "bare minimum" I would be rich man... And people wonder why I'm jaded.
Much of the economic wealth of the US in the 19th century came from the natural resources that were not yet exploited and the ability to exploit them and people without too many repercussions. As stated above, your a fool.
Read a little about the lumber wealth of the new world for some insight into this topic.
When you say "edge case" you really show your true background. It must be nice to have been born into affluence. Are you that 27 year old millionaire that was on Yahoo finance?
The real problem with capitalism, is that it values capital more then labor, much more. That's what screws people in our system. You are stealing a little time and labor from alot of people to build the capital, and there is nothing they can do about it because capital has the power.
As one of the people, I prefer people have the power, not capital.
Your approach is madness. Charity orphanages would be perfect for oil field workers. We gave you 18 years, you give us 18 years, sounds fair, but it's slavery.
Also, how many jobs in todays economy go to someone who knows someone, that's the way of the world and it only gets worse and quickly spirals into fuedalism in your scenario.
bullshit, The scenario where everything is owned happens every day to plenty of people.
Just a cursory glance at this page shows plenty of hurricans making landfall in the last 10 years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
It sounds like your in an urban area, rural areas have plenty of connectivity issues.
Judging from my anecdotal evidence, your correct;
All of these people who say "awesome, because, cloud" -- well, I have yet to be convinced that any of these vendors can provide as much uptime and reliability as a decent IT department.
Unfortunately, also from my anecdotal evidence, decent IT departments are few and far between. Budget constraints have gutted them and few are willing to pay the premium for a good admin. They prefer to hire an "entry level" admin and set their salaries accordingly.
That's why I have moved from Win to Lin. They wheat to chaff admin ratio is much better.
citation needed.
Possibly the policy cost would not be dischargable, but I'm pretty sure they would just stop the policy.
classic case of, "I got mine"
The conservatives basically won't be happy until they can warehouse poor people in pods and give them gruel twice a day.
Interestingly enough, and unknown to many people, some state and local government agencies were not bound by those rules. They still might not be. You could switch to a job at a state agency and get caught with the pre-existing condition clause.
Let me guess, this guy lives in an area where there is effectively one party in charge and nobody else bothers to run.
You don't sound very well informed, the system is definitely hard to get into without insurance or private pay. Even with those there are the difficulties you mention.
sorry, but netflix blows basic cable away.
When they double them without offering any additional value
Orange is the New Black, Hemlock Grove, Disney movies, almost every show on Cartoon Network, every hit show from the cable providers (Breaking Bad, Walking Dead, etc)
All added since the price increase, which I think was mostly to discourage dvd customers, since they want out of that market.
I think there were alot of Netflix early adopters that essentially want everything to be available, they won't be happy with less. I am one of the later adopters who grabbed it for the value. Essentially any show worth watching shows up on Netflix. There is some delay, but with their deep catalog I can always find something to watch. It's also about 1/10th the price of cable, more like 1/15th.
I use Uverse, it is IPTV. There is no difference if that stream is AT&T's or Netflix's (on the last mile).
My kids learn fractions, you should move.
About to hit 42 myself and completely agree. And we were thought to be completely rotten teens by adults.... today's kids make us look like genius saints.
-said every 42 year old in history...
I think you have confused faith and fact, sorry.
I'm not sure the cut-and-spend bums are any better then the tax-and-spend bums.
Unfortunately, this discussion won't make it to the supreme court for clarification, so we can only look at existing decisions and say they are settled, because they are settled. That's what the court does, it verifies that the law is being implemented correctly based on what was written.
Give him a break, he's obviously slow (to embrace change, conservative).
No, he pointed to the place it says as confirmed by the Supreme Court. Ignorance is no defense.
Remarkably insightful. Thanks.
If I had a nickel for everytime I assumed "right thing" was happening only to get "bare minimum" I would be rich man...
And people wonder why I'm jaded.