I found out that VNC is the way to go. Of course, you need Internet to be working, but it saved me several trips. When Internet is not working I know I can only hope the cable is unplugged or something like that, or I have to solve the problem in situ...
Re:The politicians have sold out the American Work
on
U.S. Jobs Jumping Ship
·
· Score: 1
I'm thinking that at some point we will need to roll our prices and wages back.
Maybe the problem is not so much lowering salaries, but lowering cost of living there (housing, food, taxes). No other country is pending so much in defense. And real state prices are up because after a booble everyone flies from stocks into real state. So you can't find a home for a decent price.
Of course it works, but Americans now have to buy motorcycles that cost 1.45 times the optimal price. And in that fashion everyone wants "protection". The end result is that your costs are higher that in the rest of the world, you can't compete and have to start hiring elsewhere...
Also, you have a lot of rich people buying homes as an investment, of course real state prices will rise and you'll again have a problem beign competitive.
One nice solution is to move somewhere else, really.
Are you telling me that prohibiting Microsoft from hiring foreign programmers would force them out of business? I doubt it. Bill Gates could probably just fit is pile of money into a mansion with lower ceilings.
Well, in the case of Microsoft it could work, though Microsoft cannot be forced to develop in the US.
In the U.S., we have a situation that simply cannot work.
Of course you can't compete, they do have lower costs (in terms of dollars). That's the problem with having a highly powered currency.
There is no definitive solution. In the long term Indians will improve their salaries and their costs will rise. You cannot expect a high salariy for something that can be done anywhere else. You'd be better working in a field that can't be done remotely.
"Don't be a fool" was meant to mean something like "come on", maybe an idiomatic problem (in spanish it's like I said).
But the thing is you can either protect jobs or protect higher salaries but not both. You have to choose between "higher salaries than normal" or "enough jobs for everybody". The best the goverment can do is to lower the defense and health budgets, lower taxes, improve education (US education _not_ good, you should be able to fire teachers) and protect competition (ie: do not protect MS, Enron, etc).
For example, do something the rich need. For example, find the cure to some strange cancer, and you will see the money coming in. Or things like that. If the people that own 80% of the wealth do not spend or invest their money then of course you'll have a hard time trying to make a business. Or find way to be more productive than Indians, or maybe more efficient, or maybe better trained, or maybe trained in different arts the indians cannot master.
You need to differentiate from the other 4800 million guys living on Earth. Or do you thing the world economy will pay more for your works just because you where born in America? They will not! Capitalism doesn't give a damn about people. If I have to choose between a Japanise car or an American one, I'd opt for the cheapest. If Fords are more expensive then bad luck for you, I won't buy it (and sooner or later, americans will have to get fired)!
Re:The politicians have sold out the American Work
on
U.S. Jobs Jumping Ship
·
· Score: 1
When they run out of poor Indian they will have to raise salaries, right? That's the point...we need to eradicate extreme poverty, and letting these contries get some jobs is a good thing. The problem to solve is that people in America must learn new jobs that people in poorer countries can't...
Or maybe stop the patent madness, why is Medicine so expensive there? Because a lot of companies are granted perpetual monopolies so that only the very rich can afford. And evtually, when you want so justice you find out that every company must raise salaries so that your own workers can save their lives from time to time.
US is in a weak position when recession comes. People may stop buying DVD, may stop coming to the cinemas, may stop buying pritney spears CD and may stop going to the US for vacations (actually, they are refusing VISAs worldwide, so it gets even worst) but they will not stop eating.
So your economy may crumble anytime people stop buying CDs and start having to pay more for actual stuff (Food, Gas, Electricity, Housing)...
Well, the CEO does not we you a thing, he is doing his work and that's it, they pay him to do that. Now, the company can't owe you anything as it's an abstract entity. Ok, the shareholders then? Well, the shareholders are normal people, so they don't have the tax benefits, etc.
But not all is lost, in the US you have credit, so use it, start your own comapny, take a risk.
Don't be a fool, they can't easily make a profit out of paying lower salaries abroad as EVERY COMPANY can do the same. So the extra-profit goes away as soon as some company realizes they can lower their prices and increase their market share.
If you're in the CPU business, you can either cut your price, or build a better CPU.
In reality, you can't do anything about it. Ok, you may increase some market share, but the total industry sales are not going to grow just because you managed to lower prices a bit or pushed a new design that offers, let's say, 10% more power than expected...
Companies will not upgrade during a recession if they can avoid it period. Likewise, you will not create more jobs by accepting lower salaries. Yes, you may find a job if you are willing to accept 50% of the usual payment, but that only means that you are one of the guys getting whatever is being offered at the time.
In brief, lowering CPU prices will not increase total market sales but maybe your share of those and accepting lower salaries will not create new jobs inmediately. To get out of a recession you need to convience the people with savings to start investing in real projects and to increase consumption.
Of course, if the US can't compete with foreign companies, northamericans may have to get used to lower earnings.
I am pretty it's not 100% bounded. Try increasing the CDROM cache and using VIDIX if you can. If you don't hve vidix try XV. Enable doublebuffering. In mplayer, for a DVD and a 433 mhz celeron notebook i'd use something like:
I am having recurrent nitemares about the previous network administrator coming in and start trashing ard the place.
I thought of this myself as well and drew these ideas: maybe they want to at least be able to blame the last admin ("HE KNEW OUR PASSWORDS!"), maybe they already expect the last admin to have put backdoors? Maybe they just dont give a fuck about beign cautious because they haven't YET suffer the consecuences.
Your example has the problem of actually making it not a naming convention but a different beast althogether. It would change for example, how to heal them (making it harder because we understand mammals the best)...
But yes, naming conventions do not change anything, but they carry more information at the cost of vocabulary "bloat". If I say "moon X in system V" I am giving more information than saying "celestial object X in system V"...
Not so easy, last share traded x total number of shares is the market cap, but you can't buy as many shares as you'd like at that price. It all depends on SCO shareholders expectations.
Do I need to delete my Slakware gnome version? Mh, I may have a problem installing it, because I custom installed many things, including Evolution (default version did not want to play nice with my Palm)
Do you know how many people die per day for IDIOTIC reasons? Are we missing the point? Nope, I think people like being hypocrats and saying they are really REALLY sad about the loss of lives of these astronausts. These astronauts of course didn't want to die, but they sure as hell knew that they where doing something very demanding and dangerous. They chosen it nonetheless. Now, many people starve to death everyday, and we don't give a damn...
I mean, what's my point? It's just that I can't stand hypocracts...because they take the worst opportinities to show how "sensitive" and caring they are, when they really are NOT...
Slashdot Mirror
I found out that VNC is the way to go. Of course, you need Internet to be working, but it saved me several trips. When Internet is not working I know I can only hope the cable is unplugged or something like that, or I have to solve the problem in situ...
I'm thinking that at some point we will need to roll our prices and wages back.
Maybe the problem is not so much lowering salaries, but lowering cost of living there (housing, food, taxes). No other country is pending so much in defense. And real state prices are up because after a booble everyone flies from stocks into real state. So you can't find a home for a decent price.
Of course it works, but Americans now have to buy motorcycles that cost 1.45 times the optimal price. And in that fashion everyone wants "protection". The end result is that your costs are higher that in the rest of the world, you can't compete and have to start hiring elsewhere...
Also, you have a lot of rich people buying homes as an investment, of course real state prices will rise and you'll again have a problem beign competitive.
One nice solution is to move somewhere else, really.
Are you telling me that prohibiting Microsoft from hiring foreign programmers would force them out of business? I doubt it. Bill Gates could probably just fit is pile of money into a mansion with lower ceilings.
Well, in the case of Microsoft it could work, though Microsoft cannot be forced to develop in the US.
In the U.S., we have a situation that simply cannot work.
Of course you can't compete, they do have lower costs (in terms of dollars). That's the problem with having a highly powered currency.
There is no definitive solution. In the long term Indians will improve their salaries and their costs will rise. You cannot expect a high salariy for something that can be done anywhere else. You'd be better working in a field that can't be done remotely.
"Don't be a fool" was meant to mean something like "come on", maybe an idiomatic problem (in spanish it's like I said).
But the thing is you can either protect jobs or protect higher salaries but not both. You have to choose between "higher salaries than normal" or "enough jobs for everybody". The best the goverment can do is to lower the defense and health budgets, lower taxes, improve education (US education _not_ good, you should be able to fire teachers) and protect competition (ie: do not protect MS, Enron, etc).
For example, do something the rich need. For example, find the cure to some strange cancer, and you will see the money coming in. Or things like that. If the people that own 80% of the wealth do not spend or invest their money then of course you'll have a hard time trying to make a business. Or find way to be more productive than Indians, or maybe more efficient, or maybe better trained, or maybe trained in different arts the indians cannot master.
You need to differentiate from the other 4800 million guys living on Earth. Or do you thing the world economy will pay more for your works just because you where born in America? They will not! Capitalism doesn't give a damn about people. If I have to choose between a Japanise car or an American one, I'd opt for the cheapest. If Fords are more expensive then bad luck for you, I won't buy it (and sooner or later, americans will have to get fired)!
When they run out of poor Indian they will have to raise salaries, right? That's the point...we need to eradicate extreme poverty, and letting these contries get some jobs is a good thing. The problem to solve is that people in America must learn new jobs that people in poorer countries can't...
who are willing to do the same job for less money because they don't care about having an american standard of living
Let me expain, jobs are a commodity. If there are to much people willing to work then they must lower their prices. It's supply and demand.
If you want higher salaries do something more needed, more difficult or more disgusting. Bitching will not earn you higher salaries. Being smart will.
Or maybe stop the patent madness, why is Medicine so expensive there? Because a lot of companies are granted perpetual monopolies so that only the very rich can afford. And evtually, when you want so justice you find out that every company must raise salaries so that your own workers can save their lives from time to time.
US is in a weak position when recession comes. People may stop buying DVD, may stop coming to the cinemas, may stop buying pritney spears CD and may stop going to the US for vacations (actually, they are refusing VISAs worldwide, so it gets even worst) but they will not stop eating.
So your economy may crumble anytime people stop buying CDs and start having to pay more for actual stuff (Food, Gas, Electricity, Housing)...
Well, the CEO does not we you a thing, he is doing his work and that's it, they pay him to do that. Now, the company can't owe you anything as it's an abstract entity. Ok, the shareholders then? Well, the shareholders are normal people, so they don't have the tax benefits, etc.
But not all is lost, in the US you have credit, so use it, start your own comapny, take a risk.
Don't be a fool, they can't easily make a profit out of paying lower salaries abroad as EVERY COMPANY can do the same. So the extra-profit goes away as soon as some company realizes they can lower their prices and increase their market share.
If you're in the CPU business, you can either cut your price, or build a better CPU.
In reality, you can't do anything about it. Ok, you may increase some market share, but the total industry sales are not going to grow just because you managed to lower prices a bit or pushed a new design that offers, let's say, 10% more power than expected...
Companies will not upgrade during a recession if they can avoid it period. Likewise, you will not create more jobs by accepting lower salaries. Yes, you may find a job if you are willing to accept 50% of the usual payment, but that only means that you are one of the guys getting whatever is being offered at the time.
In brief, lowering CPU prices will not increase total market sales but maybe your share of those and accepting lower salaries will not create new jobs inmediately. To get out of a recession you need to convience the people with savings to start investing in real projects and to increase consumption.
Of course, if the US can't compete with foreign companies, northamericans may have to get used to lower earnings.
It's free for anyone that plays by the rules. You can use the software, but not abuse it.
I am pretty it's not 100% bounded. Try increasing the CDROM cache and using VIDIX if you can. If you don't hve vidix try XV. Enable doublebuffering. In mplayer, for a DVD and a 433 mhz celeron notebook i'd use something like:
/dev/hdd -double -cache 18000 -framedrop -osdlevel 0 -ao oss -fs -dr -dvd 5 -chapter 1
mplayer -vo xvidix -q
Not much left to do, but you can start the server with minimal overhead, like in "X & Eterm" (no window manager) and see if it helps a bit.
I am having recurrent nitemares about the previous network administrator coming in and start trashing ard the place.
I thought of this myself as well and drew these ideas: maybe they want to at least be able to blame the last admin ("HE KNEW OUR PASSWORDS!"), maybe they already expect the last admin to have put backdoors? Maybe they just dont give a fuck about beign cautious because they haven't YET suffer the consecuences.
Your example has the problem of actually making it not a naming convention but a different beast althogether. It would change for example, how to heal them (making it harder because we understand mammals the best)...
But yes, naming conventions do not change anything, but they carry more information at the cost of vocabulary "bloat". If I say "moon X in system V" I am giving more information than saying "celestial object X in system V"...
If you're so afraid of 'the man' steeling your software, just get it copywrited, how else to companies like Microsoft make it big?
All GPL software is copyrighted by their respective owners / creators. They never lose their copyright!
Not so easy, last share traded x total number of shares is the market cap, but you can't buy as many shares as you'd like at that price. It all depends on SCO shareholders expectations.
Do I need to delete my Slakware gnome version? Mh, I may have a problem installing it, because I custom installed many things, including Evolution (default version did not want to play nice with my Palm)
They could have chosen ANY name, yet they are sticking to the Lindows name, why? Sure they must know what they are doing.
Because you multiply the primes and you get the number you where trying to factor?
Doesn't matter much, by the time large databases fit in memory, conventional ram will be the slowest thing arround.
So...we have to start with the kinds and newcommers ... seems easy but will take some time :0
Do you know how many people die per day for IDIOTIC reasons? Are we missing the point? Nope, I think people like being hypocrats and saying they are really REALLY sad about the loss of lives of these astronausts. These astronauts of course didn't want to die, but they sure as hell knew that they where doing something very demanding and dangerous. They chosen it nonetheless. Now, many people starve to death everyday, and we don't give a damn...
I mean, what's my point? It's just that I can't stand hypocracts...because they take the worst opportinities to show how "sensitive" and caring they are, when they really are NOT...