Slashdot Mirror


Centrino Laptops Reviewed

Jeff Mancuso writes "CNET seems to be the first out with full reviews of the new Centrino Pentium M laptops. The performance looks solid, the features are great, designs are thin and battery life runs up to 4-7 hours on these machines." Yeah, I had hoped that we would make it on the review list, but alas, no such luck. Nice looking machines, though.

236 comments

  1. Logo by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

    The Centrino logo is awful though... God.

    --
    1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
    1. Re:Logo by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed by the logo...

      Even more disappointing was the marketing spiel. I mean if you're gonna give an interview to ZDNet on the new initiative on which your company is betting its mobile division, you'd think they'd give him someone that can answer his questions in a clear, articulated manner, and not just continually steer him back to her marketing presentation on every question and comment.

      I am not impressed.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  2. Damn it by Toasty16 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Centrinos are out and I had to buy a Dell Inspiron 8200 with a P4-M 1.80Ghz last Friday. I hate technology ;-)

    1. Re:Damn it by robinthecandystore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just call dell and ask them if you can change it. They'll ask you to pay the price difference, but they'll allow this. I did it a month ago. I wasn't really happy with the inspiron laptop I got so I rang and eventually (within an hour or so) got them to agree to change it for a latitude c640 I just paid the difference.

    2. Re:Damn it by thomanil · · Score: 1

      Envy's a bitch, eh?

    3. Re:Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OHHAAAHOOHOA HAHAHAHAA

      You missed the point, fuckhead.

    4. Re:Damn it by agallagh42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should have got the IBM T40. Check out these specs from the CNET review:

      "anywhere from 256MB to a big 2GHz of speedy 266MHz DDR SDRAM"

      Whoa, 2GHz of RAM? So big and new, they had to change the units of measure :-)

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    5. Re:Damn it by Speedfreak515 · · Score: 0

      You can have 2GB on the 8500, too. Though it's not Centrino.

    6. Re:Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was common knowledge that Banias/Centrino was going to be released at cebit. If you had asked me, I would have told you to wait ;)

      - Chad

    7. Re:Damn it by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a better laptop.

      Am I allowed to call him an assclown?

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    8. Re:Damn it by gpoul · · Score: 1

      make that 2GB. - Now your PowerBook w/ 1GB RAM looks outdated, eh? :-)

    9. Re:Damn it by thomanil · · Score: 1

      But of course. My own Inspiron arrives in a few days, but i figured it was a cheap shot..

    10. Re:Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cust service will need your order number or service tag - exchange/return can be done within 30 days of purchase which is actually ship date from Dell.

  3. Battery Life and Heat by NitroPye · · Score: 1, Troll

    Probably had to sacrifice power for battery life. This is why I choose an apple portable. I have a powerful chip that is energy efficient so I get fine battery life with no crippled processor. I wonder how hot these things get though.

    1. Re:Battery Life and Heat by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      OTOH, Apple Titaniums get quite hot too...

      --
      blah
    2. Re:Battery Life and Heat by NitroPye · · Score: 1

      Ohh yea very much so. Not as bad as the new 12" AluBooks though. If your wearing pants it really is not that big of an issue unless you dont move it around at all to disperse the heat amungst all the lap

    3. Re:Battery Life and Heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "crippled" cpu is still going to be faster than the g4, unless your running the cherry picked photoshop filters that Steve Jobs uses.

    4. Re:Battery Life and Heat by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, it shows the IBM with 416 minutes of battery life, while running a 1.3GHz, 1.5GHz, or 1.6GHz and a 64MB ATI Mobility FireGL. Not too shabby, I say, although it comes with Windows XP Professional, XP Home, 2000, 98 Gold, 98 SE, or NT 4.0 (with Service Pack 6a). Most of our laptops made locally here are getting breanded Linux on them. I buy my stuff domestic.

    5. Re:Battery Life and Heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment is meaningless. Benchmarks are meaningless.

    6. Re:Battery Life and Heat by NitroPye · · Score: 1

      Clock speed yes. But its still in my mind an inferior chip. The x86 platform may be cheap as hell now adays but its power consumption is poor and its in need of an update. Plus you can't run os x on a pc ;)

    7. Re:Battery Life and Heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! Apple zealot!

      First you trash the intel chips in favor of motorola/ibm's and then you jump straight to the availability of Apple software for PCs! What does one have to do with the other, unless you just LOVE everything Apple and for no other reason than it is Apple.

      Thanks for the giggle ;-)

    8. Re:Battery Life and Heat by NitroPye · · Score: 1

      Get a username

  4. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... why there's no direct link to the article. I mean tomorrow the cnet.com frontpage could have changed completely, couldn't it?

    Anyway here's the 'overview' as they call it:

    http://www.cnet.com/hardware/0-1027-8-20926222-1 .h tml?tag=ld

  5. Fule Cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still say fule cells are more convient and will be better (a lot) in the next 5 years

    1. Re:Fule Cells by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Fuel cells?

      They sound like a good idea, but they also have the potential to explode and inflict damage on the user. Even current batteries can do that as one female owner of a dell laptop found out first hand.

      Fuel cells contain hydrogen and I would be pretty scared to carry around a laptop with that much energy potential in it. Suppose you leave it in the sun? what if it leaks.

    2. Re:Fule Cells by BeBoxer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fuel cells contain hydrogen and I would be pretty scared to carry around a laptop with that much energy potential in it.

      I dunno if I would worry about it too much. First, fuel cells don't have to use hydrogen. A lot of different hydrocarbon fuels can be used, depending on the design of the cell. I believe that the new laptop fuel cells that have been announced will be using methanol (rubbing alchohol) for fuel. Second, you have to keep it in perspective. How many people carry around butane lighters? There is a significant amount of energy in one of those, yet they seem to be remarkably safe. I've never heard of a catastrophic lighter accident, although I'm sure it happens. No reason to assume that a fuel cell "tank" wouldn't be at least as safe.

    3. Re:Fule Cells by Big+Swede · · Score: 1

      I think he meant fool cells

    4. Re:Fule Cells by X43B · · Score: 1

      "...I would be pretty scared to carry around a laptop with that much energy potential in it" You can't have it both ways. People are complaining how batteries haven't increased in perfomance significantly in the past few years. The main reason for this is that there are physical limitations in the energy density of a traditional battery. The work around for this is to go from batteries to fuel cells. This is why automobile manufacturers have all but given up on a battery powered car and are working on few cell cars. As is generally the case, the higher the energy density, the higher the *possibility* for danger. If you take this argument to its logical conclusion, the highest energy density occurs in "nuclear" devices, which also happens to be the most dangerous, if not designed properly.

    5. Re:Fule Cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fuel cells contain hydrogen and I would be pretty scared to carry around a laptop with that much energy potential in it.

      E=MC^2. Everything you carry around (including your body) has a lot of potential energy in it.

    6. Re:Fule Cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hydrogen is not as flamable as you think. The Hindenberg disaster was caused by the coating on the shell itself and not the hydrogen within.

    7. Re:Fule Cells by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      In that case I'd like you to put your money where your mouth is and put a match to a balloon full of H2. Tell us how it went.

    8. Re:Fule Cells by Nix0n · · Score: 1

      Methanol is not rubbing alcohol. Methanol == Wood Alcohol Isopropanol == Rubbing Alcohol FYI.

  6. comercial? by IAR80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this a comercial? If so please post the link to the article because I'm to lazzy to browse through CNET.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    1. Re:comercial? by Bonker · · Score: 1

      Commercial indeed. Why trust reports from people who are given the hardware. We all know that they would not be getting all the lovely free hardware if they didn't shill, at least a little.

      Slashdot is hardly unbiased, but at least it doesn't shill for hardware companies... yet.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  7. link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks slashdot for providing a link to this fantastic full review!

    1. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-1027-8-209262 22-1.html

    2. Re:link? by MatthewRothenberg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hey! Don't forget about our fab-gear Centrino coverage over at Ziff Davis:

      Centrino Is a Showstopper

      Centrino Special Report

  8. That link won't make sense in the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For when this article gets moved off Cnet's front page, here's a direct link.

    And just so you won't mod me up, here's a link to goatse.cx

  9. Centrino logo- what can you see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surely the centrino logo is actually a rorschach blot test.
    determines your personality from what you see in the logo

    1. Re: Centrino logo- what can you see by flsniper · · Score: 0

      Geez I hope not because to me it looks like two blonde nurses having sex with each other whilst eating an ice cream cone!

      --
      "This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time."
  10. Article Link by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Informative

    For you lazy bastards.

    http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-1027-8-209262 22-1.html?tag=ld

    Enjoy. Oh, and, to be honest, I'm happy with my new 12" PowerBook G4 - It does everything I want, and then some. :-D

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:Article Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.birdstep.com/news/archive.php3?ID=56&ty pe=news

    2. Re:Article Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I can't even read the whole article. I can get to the first 'overview' page, but every link I click after that causes no pages to load, nothing at all to happen. Phoenix is my browser of choice, cookies are refused.

      I tell you, I can't get over how lovely shit-poor web design makes me.

    3. Re:Article Link by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like this round of PC notebooks is just starting barely, to catch up to Apple's stuff. [shrug] Hopefully this will provide an incentive for Apple to keep coming out with great new notebooks.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Article Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can even cook food on it !

    5. Re:Article Link by RedCard · · Score: 1

      I guess that, just like the apple iMac, (accoring to MSN) a Macintosh computer is "the pc you really want."

    6. Re:Article Link by xombo · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm happy with my 15" PowerBook, and I would never want to go back to a WinTel platform again. No matter how much they try, Windows will not be stable because they have to spend time writing different drivers for different computers, and then keep it all closed up. With apple, they only have to write drivers for a few computers, they go for quality not quantity.

    7. Re:Article Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, dude, that thinkpad with 7 hours of battery life sounds really tempting, compared to the 2.6 hours cnet claims your laptop has...

  11. funny joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    how many Hemoses does it take to change a lightbulb?


    One, but he has to wait until after CmdrTaco has changed it first!

  12. For those who actually want a LINK TO THE STORY .. by Mikey-San · · Score: 1, Redundant
    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  13. Pentium M? by Undaar · · Score: 5, Funny

    What the hell happened to Pentiums V through CMXCIX?

    --
    ~ "When I'm of that age I'm just going to live up a tree."
    1. Re:Pentium M? by cperciva · · Score: 1

      The same thing as happened to Windows 99 through 1999.

    2. Re:Pentium M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >through CMXCIX?

      Or, for short, IM. :-)

    3. Re:Pentium M? by ersgameboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention 3.12 - 94

  14. Maybe I'll buy one of these by alanxz · · Score: 0

    Wow, these are the first PC laptops to come close (surpass?) to Apple's PB's in a while - in speed, battery life and weight. The screens look nice. Now if only they would add in the coolness factor that a PB provides.

    --
    Q: Whats the difference between roast beef and pea soup? A: Anyone can roast beef, but not many can pea soup.
    1. Re:Maybe I'll buy one of these by silvakow · · Score: 1

      Wow, these are the first PC laptops to come close (surpass?) to Apple's PB's in a while

      I agree. I'm an iBook user instead of a Powerbook user for financial reasons, but this will certainly give me second thoughts next time I purchase a laptop. The only thing that came close to the Mac laptops in battery life and leetness factor was the Sony Vaio, which at the time I purchased the iBook was not enough to grab my sale. This might move Apple from their currently large chunk of the laptop market.

      --
      In the long run, we're all dead.
  15. next up: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    a review of Kathleen Fent.

  16. Re:For those who actually want a LINK TO THE STORY by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

    And next time, I'll:

    A) Preview my posts;

    2) And use <P> or <BR> tags so my posts are formatted well! :)

    -/-
    Mikey-San

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  17. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone donate hardware to a web site that continually shows a bias towards certain companies?

  18. Battery life by tmark · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why hasn't it advanced much compared to just about every other technology in a laptop ? To me, low battery life and low weight are THE most important characteristics of any laptop, I might use, but we had laptops running for 2-3 hours 5-7 years ago, which is still where most laptops are at. Here it seems the Centrino ekes out its long life through advances in the CPU, not through better batteries.

    A recent Sony Vaio notebook I just got, while a lovely machine, lasts *maybe* 1 1/2 hours when all the consumption-related options are turned way down. Plug in the wifi card and it's borderline useless.

    So why hasn't battery life advanced significantly ? Are we already at a theoretical limit of battery performance ? Or is battery performance improving, but just managing to keep pace with ever-increasing power-consumption ?

    1. Re:Battery life by Hollinger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not so much battery technology as power consumption (and waste) of the battery. That huge 16" on some laptops sucks up watts left and right. That new P4-1.X Ghz pulls away power too. Oh, and don't forget about the GPU and the spindles for the drives.

      Out of that list, the three that you could most obviously increase the power efficiency of are the ones where the masses want the latest and greatest. You could make a machine that runs for hours and hours, but it'd have a crappy little i810 graphics chip, and a p3, and a smaller display, which, honestly, is last century's technology, and not as appealing as the new gigahertz monsters.

      My VAIO (6 month old GRX), when running at the "slow" speed of 1.1 Ghz with full backlight and 3Com WiFi X-jack card, runs for 2.5 -> 3 hours, depending on how many packets I fling out to the base station, and how much I pound on the hard drive.

      If you want to know where your battery's going, it's the new "space warmer" feature that comes standard with most laptops.

    2. Re:Battery life by rgmoore · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are two reasons that battery life isn't getting better. One is that there's an inherent competetion between improved battery life and improved features. Whenever somebody comes up with an improvement in energy storage, it can be used either to give you more time or to feed more cool stuff, like more powerful processors, extra storage devices, or a nicer screen. The competetion from cool stuff has a tendency to keep the life from improving as much as you might like.

      Equally important, there are serious physical limits to the amount of energy that a battery can hold. For a given mass of battery, the total energy storage is limited by the chemical properties of the materials you can use in the battery. Since those properties are reasonably well known, and people have been making batteries for a couple hundred years now, most of the possible advances have already been made. There just isn't much space for improvement once you've switched to the highest energy materials available. The only way to get radically higher energy density than is currently available is by switching to something other than batteries, like fuel cells.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    3. Re:Battery life by larien · · Score: 4, Informative
      Batteries have been around for decades and we probably have eked out most of the performance from them. However, I did read something in the last few days about some advances in lithium batteries which may help out.

      In essence, batteries use well known chemistry/physics which we know a lot more about than making CPUs. Added to this, there are certain hard limits in this based on the chemistry/physics involved. We're probably already fairly near them using current battery techniques. The advances above may help out, but until they've delivered, we're stuck at current battery technology.

      To be honest, another approach should be to make CPUs equivalent to 500MHz PIIs; it's enough for most things (word processing, email) and should be able to be designed at a very low power consumption.

    4. Re:Battery life by lavalyn · · Score: 1

      More complicated processor, more transistors, more energy burned.

      More bitblt activity and multimedia display, more energy burned.

      More pixels on screen, more energy burned.

      More radio signal activity, more energy burned.

      When people realize this, laptop speeds will go down to usable levels (1GHz will play DivX movies fine, and that's probably the most intensive thing you could possibly do well on a laptop). Until then, expect those laptops to continue tacking on more battery burning "features."

      --
      Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    5. Re:Battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that I'd get more battery life if I ran Linux with a framebuffer console instead of X?

    6. Re:Battery life by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When people realize this, laptop speeds will go down to usable levels (1GHz will play DivX movies fine, and that's probably the most intensive thing you could possibly do well on a laptop). Until then, expect those laptops to continue tacking on more battery burning "features."

      Well, what about people who do realize this. They realize that is what PDAs are for and such, and for a laptop they do want a powerhouse. I want a laptop that can run my entire development environment, quick compiles, while listening to mp3s and when I'm finished, reboot into windows and play some warcraft 3.

      Remember, not everybody feels the same way as you. This is why their is market diversity.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    7. Re:Battery life by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > I did read something in the last few days about some advances in lithium batteries which may help out.

      Fuel cells. Just pee in the catheter once in awhile to keep it running...

    8. Re:Battery life by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why don't you take a look at the links? The IBM machine tested at 7 hours!

      As for battery technology, slashdot has had several articles on fuel cells. (Whether these can strictly be called "batteries" we'll leave to the pedants.) Those are supposed to hit the market within a year.

    9. Re:Battery life by danlyke · · Score: 1

      Look further. There are laptops out there with longer run times. If I swap the CD drive for the second battery in my Fujitsu Lifebook and am careful not to hit the disk too often and keep the backlight low, I can get 8 to 11 hours of run time.

      I think the real reason nobody's building more laptops like this is that for most people laptops are a toy, and a brighter bigger screen to impress the other marketing dorks is far more important to those purchasers than being able to get away from everything for a full day. And, too, how often are you really away from being able to sneak wall power for that long? Even on flights to Asia, which is why I got the extra battery for this thing, I usually need to catch a few hours of sleep so that I'm functional when I get there, which makes the run time I really need if I want to work that whole trip (rather than, say, divert myself with something on dead trees) more like five or six hours.

    10. Re:Battery life by jhines0042 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Two words: Transmeta Processor.

      My new Fujitsu Lifebook P-2000 notebook is a wonderful machine. With the extended main battery I was able to watch all of the Two Towers (single disk 3 hour version) before the battery died.

      Take out the DVD drive and put in the second battery and I can listen to MP3s for 10 hours on battery.

      Ok, so its not the most powerful processor in the world, but it does allow me to play games, so far I've played Civ III for 2.5 hours and still had 50% battery life left. I'm going to try out Homeworld soon, I'll let you know.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    11. Re:Battery life by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Fuel cells. Just pee in the catheter once in awhile to keep it running...

      No, that's the watercooling option.

    12. Re:Battery life by tungwaiyip · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately when faced the choice between performance and battery most vendor bias toward performance. I am a programmer spending a lot of time on commute train. 3+ hour is what I demand. I spend more time on text editor and web browser than any other thing I don't really need high speed in that circumstance. Unfortunately with CPU speed turned low (Intel SpeedStep?) I still get only around 2 hours, much less than my PIII.

    13. Re:Battery life by genka · · Score: 1

      Once I read an article by a chemical engineer from a major battery power. He said they are lucky to improve capacity by 5% a year on average. If batteries were improving like CPUs, regular AAs could store energy of a nuke.

    14. Re:Battery life by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't it advanced much compared to just about every other technology in a laptop

      Because the marketplace is not dominated by the low-weight/small crowd. The marketplace wants cheap, powerful and reasonably luggable. If the market cared as much about weight and size as you do, Transmeta would have actual hope.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    15. Re:Battery life by xombo · · Score: 2, Informative

      My 600 Mhz VAIO only gets about 30-50 min of battery power, just playing mp3's and surfing wireless. With no wireless I get about 1 hour if I am very lucky. I think x86 just plain sucks in terms of power consumption. I got a powerbook now, and it's battery life is about 3.5 hours and that isn't just playing mp3's, that is using the internet, photoshop, VNC, terminal, SSH, chat, etc. I don't see why people put up with Wintel laptops.

    16. Re:Battery life by Hollinger · · Score: 1

      My primary reason is that I the software I have for Windows, and my choices for most of my apps for college are Linux and Windows. Given the choice, I take XP. If I could have my way, I'd have a TiBook (I own three other Macs that serve me well).

      I'm guessing AMD's new offering might do better. We'll see. If we can get the focus away from performance and to longevity, we'll have great machines. Some year now, it'll happen. My prediciton is that once a device the size of your cell phone can take dictation and parse it into text, we'll start working on power consumption.

    17. Re:Battery life by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go pee on your hand sometime. Pee is very warm. And oh yeah, it doesn't smell good either.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  19. sweet laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those centrinos are nice, but I know of a better laptop: your mom.

  20. These notebooks support only by xintegerx · · Score: 0

    These only support the weaker kind of WiFi -- 802.11b.

    They will have 802.11g which is both a+b (a is faster speeds) in June according to stuff I've read before.

    So if you're interested, remember that.

    1. Re:These notebooks support only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, at least the IBM comes with 802.11a/b support.

    2. Re:These notebooks support only by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Dell does 802.11a/b/g for the Latitude D600. Yes, all 3 in one.

      Now that Intel has good battery life (according to CNET test), what is the number one gripe for Mac zealouts? OS X might be valid... anything else?

    3. Re:These notebooks support only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superdrives?

      OSX? Not-Windows? Unix-for-the-masses?

      One second wake up times?

      A vendor-supported, hardware accelerated X11 implementation? That's free (as in Beer)?

      Firewire on all models?

      I could go on..

    4. Re:These notebooks support only by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      800 Mb/s Firewire, able to be run in fully fault-tolerant and redundant circles? :)

      -T

    5. Re:These notebooks support only by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Why is burning DVD's needed for a guy on the go such as myself?

      I already use UNIX for the masses. It's called Mandrake.

      One second - check. Mandrake does that fine.

      X11 sucks. There is just no better option right now (remind you of something...)

      Firewire why? I don't need it. Adds unnecessary costs, weight, and points of failure.

      Please... go on.

    6. Re:These notebooks support only by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Nothing is fully fault tolerant. Unless you believe in "God" of course ;)

    7. Re:These notebooks support only by peter · · Score: 1

      802.11g is _not_ just dual band a/b. It is 802.11a's OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, which is a really good way to send bits without multipath interference problems) at 2.4GHz, the same band as 802.11b. It is backwards compatible with 11b. The draft standard includes some optional modulations, like PBCC at 22Mb/s, which is already used by Texas Instruments chipsets, notably in D-Link's "802.11b+" gear. Thus, TI's 802.11g gear will be able to talk to their b+ gear at 22. (Very little hope of chipsets from other manufacturers doing PBCC, though, so they would only talk to "b+" gear at 11Mb/s.)

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  21. Target market dissonance? by lavalyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It appears the Centrino is a processor that actually could be practical, conserving battery power at the expense of computing power. As such, the market is of people that want more battery time, and are going to sacrifice computing power to do so.

    Why do these laptops then contain such battery burning parts as large screens, CDRW/DVD drives, and weigh as much as 7lb?

    When I saw the Sony Picturebook with Transmeta Crusoe processor, I was drooling. Not because it was a Crusoe processor, but because it was a computer that could do what mobile people need it to do, and do it for a long time, and be unobtrusive enough to put in my jacket pocket.

    If you're going to get a portable computer but you're always going to be plugged in when using it, get a cheap ECS Desknote that doesn't come with a battery. If you worry a bit about battery time, get a normal mobile Pentium IV or Mobile Athlon. If you're insane about battery life, get a Crusoe. I don't see the middle ground between the last two.

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    1. Re:Target market dissonance? by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony Picturebook. I love it. It lives in my shoulder bag, and goes everywhere with me. It would be nice if it was a bit lighter, a bit faster, ran something other than WinXP... And if it lasted longer than two hours. Now that I'm working again, I think it's time to buy the extended battery.

    2. Re:Target market dissonance? by Shenkerian · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the middle ground between the Pentium 4 and the Crusoe is high performance and reasonable battery life. By one speed test I read about (I think PC World's), a 1.6 GHz Pentium M-based notebook surpassed a 2.5 GHz Pentium 4 desktop in some benchmarks.

      The Pentium M is really just a much-improved Pentium 3.. 400 MHz FSB, 1 MB on-die cache, and the P4's better branch prediction. All with a better life of up to 7 hours. If you want real performance and can do only 5 - 7 hrs instead of 10 - 12, the Pentium M is much more appealing than anything Transmeta has out right now.

      I think once PC manufacturers "get it," we'll start seeing more small, 1" thick, yet powerful notebooks, like IBM's new T, with 4 - 5 hrs battery life. Apple's huge hardware lead in the mobile market will be significantly diminished by Intel's (and AMD's, for that matter) new offering. Fortunately, I prefer my iBook for other reasons, like the OS.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    3. Re:Target market dissonance? by lavalyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do people want "High Performance" on a laptop on the go?

      Business users? I can't see them using more than a Bluetooth connection to a VPN, doing email and word processing. Crusoe will fit their bill just as well as anything AMD or Intel can make right now.

      Gamers? Centrino isn't the answer, a blazing (in more than one sense of the word) fast desktop processor on a lap with a mobile 3d accelerator, if any laptop could suffice.

      A portable MP3 unit with a little bit more intelligence? Go get a Transmeta Crusoe, it'll save your shoulders more in the long run.

      --
      Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    4. Re:Target market dissonance? by Shenkerian · · Score: 1

      Ask the target market of the 15" Powerbook. There's at least one Pentium M-based laptop with an nVidia 440 Go with 64 MB, the same GPU in the upcoming 17" Powerbook. And once Intel eases up the pressure with its 855 chipset, we'll see more notebook manufacturers following Samsung's lead.

      This chip has the potential of turning PC notebooks into viable mobile workstations, in contrast with the 7-10 lb. portable desktops we've been seeing with the Pentium 4M. Frankly, it makes me worry for Apple's "Year of the Notebook," because suddenly PCs have the potential of becoming as small, light, and powerful as Macs. This wasn't even possible with the Pentium 4M.

      And besides all that, it'll take at least the second generation of this chip to make Windows XP feel snappy.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    5. Re:Target market dissonance? by addaon · · Score: 1

      I had a picture book. Loved it. 3 hours on extended battery, ran linux (with camera support), and was generally just a great machine. Then it exploded. In lots of blue sparks. In the middle of a conference call. Needless to say, I bought a mac. Which, come to think of it, just died yesterday, the day before my thesis is due. (Yes, I'm reading /. instead of doing my thesis.) Why don't people believe that I treat my laptops well?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    6. Re:Target market dissonance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems like some transmeta propaganda.

      According to all benchmarks I have seen, these pentium M based machines have both longer battery life AND higher performance than the crusoe processor based machines currently out in the market. Thus, centrino is not occupying the "middle ground". It is replacing Crusoe in the "longest battery life" ground.

      This might change when transmeta eventually gets their next processor out the door, but to blindly say that crusoe is better at long battery for its performance is simply their marketing department having sucessfully brainwashed you.

    7. Re:Target market dissonance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nvidia 440 is hardly new or high tech. The mobility 9000 on the 15" powerbook and available on virtually every pentium-m notebook is a generation newer and offers much better performance and battery life...The Ati mobility 7500 which is on everything else also offers the exact same performance and lower battery consumption compared to the 440 go

      Even in nVidia's own year-old consumer lineup of mobile GPU's there's two chips faster than it- the 460 go and the 4200 go

      Then there's the Fire GL 7800 and 9000 and nvida's Quattro line, all of which blow away the 440 go...

      And not to mention the fact that both nvidia and ATI are releasing a completely new line of mobile chips in the next week or so that will be TWO generations ahead of the 440 go.

      And take a look at the 6 month old Compaq EVO n800W mobile workstation based on the pentium 4 m. Under 6 pounds, 15" screen 4x3 (larger screen area than a 15" widescreen on a powerbook), 1.3" thick. And still with pentium 4m 2.2 ghz and ATI fireGL 9000 with 64 meg ram.

      FInally, processor speed has absolutely no effect on making the response time of windows xp. Its all about configuring it properly (turn off useless services, modifying registry) constant defragging of the hard drive, and having enough ram to turn off the page file.

      If anything will make windows run smoother on a laptop, it will be the upcomming 7200RPM laptop drives (from IBM), not a new CPU.

  22. Dear Ann Landers, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a 'nullo', and why would i want to be one? A coworker asked if i was interested. I said yes, but i haven't been able to figure out what he meant. help!

  23. Nice reviews by Alcimedes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After actually READING the reviews, i just wanted to post a few comments.

    first, (as i type this on a G4 PB) it looks like Intel has done a great job with these chips. those battery life stats were just marketing fluff, looks like they're real. (although the 7 hour IBM had a "special" order battery with it that stuck out an inch from the back).

    it's good to see the Windows world get some laptops that are actually focusing on what makes a laptop worthwhile, weight and battery life. the alienware machines are OK i guess, but suck as a true laptop IMO.

    in any case, these chips look like a real improvement to both performance and to the Intel mindset. i'm happy to see them start working towards real world benefits in their chips over marketing hype and lame numbers games.

    1. Re:Nice reviews by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      but suck as a true laptop IMO

      I want enough balls to run JDeveloper, an Oracle instance and JBoss doing a full compile/run/debug cycle for 10 hours without complaint. That, and several other common apps in the background, a LOT of disk and RAM and a CD burner. 99 days out of 100 the longest I actually carry the thing is from my office to the back seat of my car. I do this every working day and I could care less if it weights 7-8 pounds. The only time I need the battery is while traveling or stuck in a meeting. Real computing on a plane is hopeless unless you're in 1st class and meetings don't last long enough to kill the batts.

      Too heavy? PDAs do email just fine.

      I really don't get these people that whine about weight/size. There are thin 2-3lb laptops all over the place. I won't have anything to do with them but I see them often enough. What is the problem? Does it surprise you to discover that .5" and 2.5lbs with 1076x768 won't replace your desktop? Well no sh*t Sherlock!

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  24. Re:Great news for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all very proud of your operating system!

    Stupid geek. Finding a way to work your operating system into a slashdot post. You're the kid on the playground who looked for ways to talk about his new toy in totally unrelated conversation.

    No one gives a shit. Do you use Linux as a functional system, or as a lame attempt at coolness?

  25. the mysterious future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, next up on slashdot, a dupe of this article!


    Also, some obscure MS bug, and then... a slashback on this article!

  26. Fuck You All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Anyone that says life is great is LYING. I need a chemical lobotomy like Ozzy. I'm too fucking aware of my own consciousness for my own fucking good. I just want to forget that I'm mortal and boring. I'm so fucking sick that all I can do is sit around in bed watching TV while trying to aim my phlegm into the garbage can. If anyone reading this site is in marketing, do the world a favour and kill yourself right now. I'm serious. You're worthless. You're scum. Your job is to make us feel like we're lepers and the only thing that will make us feel better is buying your product. I hate the TV. I hate you."

    1. Re:Fuck You All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Hicks? Is that you? Are you back from the planet Arcturus so soon?

  27. Hey, stupid! by barspin · · Score: 5, Funny
    Yeah, I had hoped that we would make it on the review list, but alas, no such luck. Nice looking machines, though.

    This will not get you a review unit any sooner. Review units are sent to news sites that actually test machines; not to a "news" site that would use the machine and then post a three-sentence blurb on, which would be followed by 400 comments about goatse.cx and SOVIET RUSSIA, and one on-topic post complaining about the price of the product reviewed.

    Call this flamebait, troll, whatever, but it's reality: slashdot isn't classified in the realm of a legitimate news site. It's a BBS, plain and simple.

    In summary: go buy your own fucking laptop, Hemos.

    1. Re:Hey, stupid! by fobbman · · Score: 4, Funny

      One thing you are missing, barspin. If they did send /. a laptop for review, you KNOW that they'd post a story about it at LEAST twice. Call it the Taco 2 for 1 special.

    2. Re:Hey, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Respect. Great post.

      I'd also like to say that ThinkPads are cool. Can I? Please? OK:

      ThinkPads are cool.

  28. AMD's answer: Mobile athlons with 1watt(!) by egghat · · Score: 5, Informative

    12 new Athlon Mobile models, which will go down to 1 volt core voltage and use not more than 1 watt (!).

    Check here

    The 1 watt number is from a Heise article.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    1. Re:AMD's answer: Mobile athlons with 1watt(!) by cheezedawg · · Score: 5, Informative

      That 1 watt number is crap- thats the minimum power consumption, which isn't really a useful number. According to Cnet, the maximum is 25 watts, and AMD is still working on a chip that only uses 15 watts.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    2. Re:AMD's answer: Mobile athlons with 1watt(!) by egghat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No no, the number (I can't verify the correctness; blame AMD for making bad press releases) matters.

      When the processor uses say 1 watt at 1 volt at 750 MHz and my notebook can support this: Hooray. If it uses 25 watts while running at 1500 MHz and 1,4 volt when the power cord ist plugged in: the notebook battery couldn't care less ;-)

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    3. Re:AMD's answer: Mobile athlons with 1watt(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD fscked up, big time, by waiting until cebit to do this... had they moved even a week later it wouldn't have the "me-too"ishness that it does. That and they *need* a mobile nForce, badly. Who cares if the chip is actually suitable for notebooks if it's saddled with S3 video on a VIA chipset. If I want that, I'd get a VIA C3 notebook (if such existed). At least then my lap wouldn't melt.

    4. Re:AMD's answer: Mobile athlons with 1watt(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that "minimum power consumption" doesn't mean "at the slowest speed," rather, it means "while not doing ANYTHING."

      That number is for an *idle* processor. Crunching at 700MHz is still going to draw a ton, although it will be less than at 1500MHz.

  29. weight? by Schwamm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why is it in reviews that the reviewers can't seem to bother to mention the weights of the laptops? i don't want to be toting around a seven pound beast.

    1. Re:weight? by Schwamm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pussy. If a woman can do it, so can you.

      *cough*

      i am a woman.

      and yet i fail to see what bearing that has on my desire for a 3 pound laptop.

    2. Re:weight? by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      Did you bother reading the actual reviews? Weights are listed on the "Design" page for each laptop.

    3. Re:weight? by User+956 · · Score: 1

      why is it in reviews that the reviewers can't seem to bother to mention the weights of the laptops? i don't want to be toting around a seven pound beast.

      Do you know how to read?
      "How does seven hours of battery life, great performance, and a 5.4-pound weight sound to you? That's what we thought."

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:weight? by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

      Obviously the idiot hasn't had to carry a laptop every day. There is a huge difference in carrying a 3lb v. a 7lb laptop. Mine is closer to the 7lb variety. My old boss had the less than 3lb one. Really awesome little thing. He travelled extensively for business while my laptop was almost exclusively on my desk. I did travel with mine a couple of times, but I was glad to have the larger screen on mine as I used it daily. I'd hate to have to travel often with one as big as mine.

      --
      My name fits again.
    5. Re:weight? by henele · · Score: 1
      There is a huge difference in carrying a 3lb v. a 7lb laptop.

      Yeah, a good bag. I might be a healthy, young student, but I don't flinch at the idea of carrying a couple of stone, which is, what, 13Kg?

      The idea of being able to even feel a four pound change with a decent bag is kind of alien to me :/

    6. Re:weight? by xombo · · Score: 1

      I have a VAIO and a PowerBook. I hate the VAIO, it is heavy, the powerbook is ALOT lighter and it is very easy, so it does make a big difference. The powerbook is also better and I hate Sony because they don't speak good english and they are rude. Apple people are friendly and their support is better and all. So, you are a woman on slashdot? Want to email me your number? How old are you? Preston [@] moderngeek [dot] com

    7. Re:weight? by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

      The idea of being able to even feel a four pound change with a decent bag is kind of alien to me

      On a plane with all your other luggage? Every pound counts when you are airport hopping. If you are in four different airports in a single day, it gets tiring preparing for your presentations and meetings while lugging around all your equipment. Shave a few pounds here and there and you aren't quite as exhausted at the end of the day. It really does make a difference. Yes, a good bag helps, but in and out of planes and taxis it really doesn't matter what bag you have. You get tired.

      --
      My name fits again.
    8. Re:weight? by henele · · Score: 1
      [blockquote]You get tired.[/blockquote]

      That could well be a valid, +1 point :), but I always felt anyone who complains about a frequent physical task being tough basically isn't doing it properly, and will/should improve over time... There are of course a bunch of acceptions but do something -> get better at it, should apply to most things right?

    9. Re:weight? by henele · · Score: 1
      do something -> get better at it

      That, however, for one doesn't apply to my posting skillz :)

    10. Re:weight? by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

      I did manual labor for a living for several years until I got through college and got a computer job. I worked for an equipment rental company loading and unloading equipment, etc. I'm a small person. Some of the equipment I had to lift and load was rather heavy and I couldn't lift it by myself. The customer quite often lent a hand loading it into their vehicle. I was amazed at just how weak these people are. I remember to this day one guy that looked like a body builder who was struggling to help me lift something like a lawnmower. I can lift it by myself fairly easily, but getting it into the bed of his truck alone would have been difficult. The guy was groaning and straining like it weighed five times what it did.

      I've never known why people go to the gym and yet pay someone to mow their lawn. I agree, don't wimp out and take it like a man. Too many people take the elevator. I take the stairs instead.

      --
      My name fits again.
    11. Re:weight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a reference to carrying an ever-increasingly heavy child around for several months. Most of them come out around the 7 lb range.

      At least neither of us got modded correctly.

  30. Re:Call it a night, KY cowboy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh huh, homer wuz write

  31. Centrino looks great by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems Intel found a way to dramatically lower power consumption and heat without sacrificing too much CPU power.

    I cant wait until we can get flex-atx or something like miniitx boards designed for these centrinos.

    I want to put together little console-ish media players and gaming machines to plug into the TV, and VIA Edens offerings so far are just a little to gutless, and Shuttles spacewalker boards are great, but screaming CPU and case fans wont cut it.

    I wonder how these things would cluster (yeah, imagine a beow...). Possibilities for my own personal little server farm without having to run another 150 amps of service to my PC room, and wont deafen me (a beowulf cluster of fans I dont need).

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  32. Except the Dells, where 802.11a/b/g is an option by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-1027-405-2090 6166-2.html?tag=rating

    It's not technically a "Centrino" laptop anymore, if you pick that option, just a "Pentium M." But it's the same damn laptop with a Dell 802.11a/b/g card in it instead of the Intel card.

  33. duplicate story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a business model. people pay to proofread.

  34. please mod this post down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too hard to think up new crap. How does Timothy do it?

  35. Re:Great news for Linux by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know I just posted a little blurb about this above, but I want to tell you that the fifteen local computers makers here have started putting branded linux as standard on all their machines (other OS are extra). I'm not talking about a wallpaper here, I mean all new icons with the company logo for the menu bar, hand picked apps with modifications, etc... My recent jaunt to the local hypermarket found all six of the desktops and all three of the laptops sporting some kind of branded KDE with Mozilla, Evolution and Gnome-meeting as defaults on the KDE desktop, with the whole system available in Thai. In fact, Thailand's Ministry of ICT is preparing to announce a Linux distro and an OpenOffice fork as the national OS and Office suite, respectively.
    I want to put an article together on all this, and am trying to schedule interviews and translate the necessary articles into English this week.

  36. I BELIEVE YOU MEANT 'HOMOS' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  37. Re:Birdstep Technology's Mobile IP used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like they use technology for birdstep. see the article
    http://www.birdstep.com/news/archive.php3 ?ID=56&ty pe=news

    looks like mobile ip is in the works

  38. anandtech review by adpowers · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anandtech also has their review up.

  39. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read The Friendly Article

    The laptops showed vary between 3.5 and 7 hours. Why are you complaining about battery life???

    PS You'd normally replacy Friendly with something else, but I won't tell you... muhahahahaha

  40. Little known fact by haggar · · Score: 1

    The centrino have been entirely developed in Israel under strict secrecy.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn.
      I am boycotting all products from israel so I guess this is no good to me. :(

    2. Re:Little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? They aren't boycotting any Arab product.

    3. Re:Little known fact by peter · · Score: 1

      Non sequitur. If you don't like what some group is up to, it makes sense to boycott their stuff whether or not that country is boycotting anybody else.

      You can disaprove of Israel's actions and policies without wanting Arabs to destroy it! Israel is a modern democracy, and Israelis by and large are not too brainwashed or dogmatic, so it makes sense to try to influence them. Changing Arab opinion is not easy, because parents keep bringing up their kids to hate the "great satan" and all that stupid conspiracy crap.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  41. Powerbook G4, irony by d3xt3r · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Anywone else catch the irony here? Intel has been leading the MHZ myth wars against Apple for a long time, however, Apple's been killing them in the power department.

    So now Intel realized that if they can kill the processor speed and make a low power chip. Funny thing is my friends 900 MHZ P3 laptop with "Speed-Step" technology is slower than my 800 MHZ Powerbook by a long shot. I guess Intel finally found a way to make their battery life last longer than 1 1/2 hours by further crippling their inferior chip.

    If you want a laptop that's fast, has a long battery life, and works well, you really want an Apple Powerbook G4.

    • 5 hour advertised batter life
    • Powerful processor (speed not compromised to save the battery)
    • Cool, quiet running computer: won't burn your legs or run its fan forever
    • Oh yeah, and a REAL OPERATING SYSTEM

    Forget Wintel's latest "toys". If you want a real computer, get one here.

    1. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple vs. Mac aside, you've got valid point on the marketing issue. I'm waiting for the day when Computers become marketed like cars, where the raw specs aren't important. The way I see this, we're still in the muscle-car era of computing. Once we get past the point where everyone realizes that having 350 Hp engine isn't required do drive to work, we'll have ultra-cheap and pervasive computers.

    2. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you forgot to post the prices (I'll reference ebay)

      900 MHZ P3 laptop: $700
      800 mhz Ibook: 1,235

      Forget Apple's Tax. If you want to get work done and have money left over for real life, get anything but an apple.

    3. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by Remlik · · Score: 1

      Why did this get modded to +5 interesting?

      I don't find it interesting to read someone's obviously biased opinion without supporting facts.

      It thought /. people were more critical than that...or maybe they were just impressed that he can use HTML formatting and bullets?

      --
      Apple free since 1990!
    4. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, laptops running Windows 2000 and yes even XP Professional aren't toys to me. Everything just works using W2k on my laptop, the wireless card, the Netgear NIC, modem, suspend, standby, ejecting cards, etc. Plus you can get any kind of application running on Windows. I get a good 3 and a half hours battery life on my Dell Latitude.

      Win XP/2K are good and stable operating systems (Yeah, took MS a while to get it right and finally ditch Windows 95,98,ME *shudder).

    5. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      It's already at that point, just look at the stuntaz who trick out their "b0x3n" with neon and chrome.

    6. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by notaspy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You Mac gayboys really ought to do your research. [snip] I don't sit at my computer all day using Photoshop filters. Look at games on Macs. They're pathetic."

      That's a hoot, AC. You sit at your computer all day playing games and have the hubris to call Mac proponents "gayboys" (can you spell loser? Probably not, you'd probably spell it looser).

      My guess is that most laptop purchasers buy laptops primarily to do useful work, not to play games. The story is about laptops, isn't it?

      Once again, that's "loser" not "looser" or "loozer." It's a word you definitely should get used to hearing!

      --
      hi!
    7. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Why are you benchmarking the best apple has got against a 900 mhz P3, which is 2 year old technology?

      The Pentium-M 1.6 beat the P4 2.6, so it's at least equal to the G4 per clock cycle, and yet is clocked twice as fast as the G4 0.8. Oh, and it gets 5-7 hours of battery life. In other words, the G4 is thoroughly obsolete.

    8. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by fhammond · · Score: 1

      "5 hour advertised batter[y] life"

      And what is it really? I have a TiPB and it sure as hell doesn't get five hours.

    9. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by mediahacker · · Score: 1

      re MAC v/s Win for photo applications. Check out:
      http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp? cid=7-4869-4882
      Rob Galbraith runs an excellent site for digital photographers. In January 2002, he ran some real-life photo benchmarks with two high-end systems and two older systems. In most cases the Wintel system smoked the MAC. Excellent reading...

    10. Re:Powerbook G4, irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REAL OS, you say? That's the single-vendor, half-proprietary, sluggish NeXT derivative that has absolutely no corporate take-up of note?

      I call a real OS one that is open, free, portable, flexible and fast from old Pentium boxes right up to big Sun machines. Sorry, I think Macs are alright, but they're still pretty much toys when it comes to the big wide world. Or does the 3% market share not suggest something to you?

      And one mouse button on those laptops... give me a break. I've been using computers for years; I don't need to be patronised like that.

  42. what accounts for the performance differences? by e4liberty · · Score: 3, Informative

    The performance of these machines varies quite a bit. The top performers are described and benchmark results are here.

    What accounts for this range of performance. All four machines have the same processor, clock, memory speed, bridge chip, GPU, disk speed, etc.:

    Windows XP Professional; 1.6GHz Intel Pentium M; 512MB DDR SDRAM 266MHz; ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 32MB; [many]GB 5,400rpm [drive]

    Is it all in the firmware settings?

    1. Re:what accounts for the performance differences? by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen many Cnet reviews and wondered this myself. I'm convinced that Cnet caters to its advertisers when doing product reviews. Who knows what they could have done to get the numbers to work in their favor. Ever notice all the extra applications that vendors tend to install with new systems, that boot up with Windows and stay in memory? I wouldn't be surprised if Cnet left those running.

      I've noticed similar practices on ZDnet. These guys will subtract 3 points because they don't like the media player (or CD writing software, or MP3 manager, etc.) that the notebook ships with. They seem to forget that they're judging hardware, not software.

    2. Re:what accounts for the performance differences? by willie-g · · Score: 1

      As someone who has worked in this industry, I have to say that it's not worth the effort to try to tweak performance results in order to please ad sales folks. It just won't get you anywhere anyway. Credibility is much more valuable (whether you believe they have it or not). That said, CNET disables conflicting apps before benchmarking. More info here: http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-8079207-8-859 2031-3.html

    3. Re:what accounts for the performance differences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IBM T40 actually had a 4,200 RPM drive. Not a 5,400.

  43. BusinessWeek on the new Centrino by andy1307 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is from the BusinessWeek subscription site.

    Laptop Makers Don't Want This Intel Inside The new Centrino comes with a disappointing wireless chip

    Too bad PC makers don't agree. Dell Computer Corp. (DELL ), Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ ), and other top manufacturers are eager to harness the extra power and efficiency of the new Pentium, but they are underwhelmed by Intel's wireless technology, which they say transmits data more slowly than those of rivals such as Broadcom (BRCM ).

    What's more, notebook manufacturers perceive an ulterior motive behind Intel's Centrino launch. While Otellini says Intel is combining features in one package "so everything works [well] together," some PC makers fear Intel could boost prices if it were to become the sole supplier for most of a notebook's innards. And even if Intel didn't raise prices, PC makers say they'd prefer to continue buying components from numerous suppliers so they can better set themselves apart from competitors.

  44. The "Slashdot is Fundamentally Broken" Thread. by barspin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Agree with all the above points. The moderation system is funamentally broken. Most of all, though, is the lack of fact-checking, source-checking, or for fuck's sake, SPELL CHECKING. These dolts clearly never got above a C in English.

    1. Re:The "Slashdot is Fundamentally Broken" Thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moderation system is funamentally broken. Most of all, though, is the lack of [...] for fuck's sake, SPELL CHECKING.

      Hee, hee...

  45. Re:nuke france! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why?

    Because they disagree with the USA?

  46. Underclocking? by Syncdata · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've not part of the over clocking scene, nor the laptop scene, so I wouldn't know one way or the other, but would it be possible to take an already good laptop (battery life wise) such as one of these models with the centrino, and underclock it? I'd love a laptop, but I really only want one to access email and putz around with excel files on the move.
    Is it even possible to jimjam with the bios settings, and lower the performance of the CPU? Would that even have an effect on battery life?

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Underclocking? by addaon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can do it in software on the Centrinos, I'm sure. On the other hand, with a reasonably well-designed laptop (centrino, g3, transmeta) you'll hit diminishing returns quickly. Most of these processors use between 3W and 7W of power (don't know centrino's power draw off the top of my head). Even if you manage to cut that to 1W, a 6W difference makes little difference when your monitor draws 8W-12W, your harddrive draws 2W, and even your ram and chpset draw a couple of watts between them. The difference doesn't hurt, but the performance difference probably begins to outweigh the battery life difference. A 100% performance decrease (conceptually, if we were to use a multiplier of zero on the processor) would probably correspond to a 20% battery life increase at most.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    2. Re:Underclocking? by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Every recent laptop I've seen already does this automatically. There's a program that runs that will alter the power-profile based on whether it's plugged in or running on battery, and what application/game you're running.

      However, the Vaio I used that had these types of features DIDN'T have them available in the BIOS. In fact, the BIOS had very few options. This means you have to use the Win32 software to change all the features. Kinda screws you if you want to use something other than Bill's Baby.

    3. Re:Underclocking? by stickb0y · · Score: 1
      A 100% performance decrease (conceptually, if we were to use a multiplier of zero on the processor) would probably correspond to a 20% battery life increase at most.

      In terms of minutes that a computer can be turned on, sure.

      In practical terms, however, a 100% performance decrease effectively decreases the usable battery time by 100% too, because the battery will be depleted by the time any computation can be completed.

    4. Re:Underclocking? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My NEC Versa Aptitude does this automatically - unhook the power and it drops from a PIII 750 to a ~PIII 500. Battery life is a tad under 3 hours in X, or a tad over in the CLI :o) Two batteries get me accross the atlantic - which is why I plan not to upgrade until the thing dies. It has done 2 years and 90,000 miles so far with no sign of that happening yet though!

      --
      Beep beep.
  47. And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You drive around with a tank full of gasoline in your car. It's hydrogen rich too, knucklehead, and you've got a lot more of it than you would in a hydrogen fuel cell powered laptop.

    1. Re:And yet... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Yes, but cars have much stricter safety tests. Plus use a fuel cell laptop as well as a car and you're increasing the risks.

      Using a laptop puts you in closer proximity of danger, if you were to drop the laptop and the cell exploded you could be burnt. If it malfunctions on your knee you will get very serious burns.

      Perhaps you should look at the serious damage possible with current technology before you call people "knucklehead".

      http://kennethhunt.com/archives/000565.html

    2. Re:And yet... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Well there is risk in anything. Driving for example is very risky. I think the biggest problem with fuel cell laptops would not be the saftey factor, but if it would be allowed on a plane. Ammonium Nitrate as fertilizer is very safe. By adding a blasting cap and a booster, you can blow things up. The laptop manufactures will have to address that with fuel cells.

    3. Re:And yet... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      But laptops do get knocked around, a leaking battery is a small risk, leaking fuel cell could be much worse.

    4. Re:And yet... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      "Yes, but cars have much stricter safety tests."

      How do you know that? There aren't any fuel cell laptops available right now, so I'm pretty sure the safety standards haven't been set yet.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  48. ibook vs these new guys by ilsie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to say, being a lifelong Windows user (I had a stint with Macs briefly, 10 years ago in high school yearbook class, pagemaker and what not) I was getting quite fed up with my 9 pound, 1 hour, Sony Vaio AMD laptop. So last week I sold it and went out and bought a sleek little 12" ibook. Best purchase I've ever made. After the initial learning curve with OS X (why the heck isnt Ctrl+C working? Wait, what's this weird little symbol key?) I am really digging the ibook. It's so beautiful, has great battery life, and does everything I'd ever need in a laptop. I love that I can ssh into my colo box without having to download putty. Little stuff like that.

    Anyways, long story short, if I had to do it again now with all these T&L windows laptops out, I would still go with the ibook.

    1. Re:ibook vs these new guys by xombo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but some of us aren't gay and don't want a ifag.

      Some of us are brave enough to reveal our faces and say who we are and not hide as AC. You seem to be bashing Mac's alot AC, who are you? A worker for Microsoft, Intel, AMD, C|Net?

  49. Can it be transported on airplanes? by furrygeek · · Score: 1
    Has anyone considered whether methanol or hydrogen powered laptops would be allowed in the cabin of a commercial aircraft?

    Unless I'm mistaken, the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Association) specifically forbids the transport of methanol in the cabin. I don't know if they have an issue with hydrogen or other hydrocarbons.

    There isn't any reason to worry, but there are regulations to deal with...

  50. But Is it RFC-1149 Compliant? by farrellj · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From the RFC:

    Network Working Group
    Request for Comments: 1149
    D. Waitzman
    BBN STC
    1 April 1990
    Page 1

    A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers

    Status of this Memo

    This memo describes an experimental method for the encapsulation of IP datagrams in avian carriers. This specification is primarily useful in Metropolitan Area Networks. This is an experimental, not recommended standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
    Overview and Rational

    Avian carriers can provide high delay, low throughput, and low altitude service. The connection topology is limited to a single point-to-point path for each carrier, used with standard carriers, but many carriers can be used without significant interference with each other, outside of early spring. This is because of the 3D ether space available to the carriers, in contrast to the 1D ether used by IEEE802.3. The carriers have an intrinsic collision avoidance system, which increases availability. Unlike some network technologies, such as packet radio, communication is not limited to line-of-sight distance. Connection oriented service is available in some cities, usually based upon a central hub topology.

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  51. Re:Except the Dells, where 802.11a/b/g is an optio by timeOday · · Score: 1
  52. Astro by darthBear · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know when Transmeta will have more info about the Astro? It made a splash and seems to have just gone away. I can't even find mention of it on their website.

    Seems like it could compete with the Pentium-M if/when it comes out.

  53. Re:Damn it and double damn it by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    --The Centrinos are out and I had to buy a Dell Inspiron 8200 with a P4-M 1.80Ghz last Friday. I hate technology ;-)--

    I'm still waiting for the Neutrino/X w/ Mr. Fusion inside.

  54. "It's never a good day to buy a computer" by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

    - Len Bosack, Founder of Cisco Systems

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  55. Heat is GOOD! by neildiamond · · Score: 1

    You know if someone got really smart, they'd use that excess heat from the PC to generate more electricity in the same way a Hybrid vehicle works. If laptops are hot enough to cook someone's privates, maybe we can put that to some good use.

  56. Catastrophic lighter accident by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    When I was about 11 years old I found a lighter on the ground. After discovering that it didn't work I threw it back on the ground. It exploded. I was rather surprised, and quite glad that I didn't catch a shard of what was left of it with my eye. That said, I would guess that there will be very safe methods of carrying fuel cells for laptops.

  57. Astro by glenrm · · Score: 1

    I am waiting on Astro it will be a great day when you can grab update video and CPU drivers for your cube, slate, rig, or serv.

  58. Toshiba Ultralight notebook by samfreed · · Score: 1

    Look at the new Toshiba Protege R100 Only 2.3lbs (that's near enough 1kg), 900 Mhz CPU, 12" screen.... This is the one I buy.

    1. Re:Toshiba Ultralight notebook by jgennick · · Score: 1

      I tried to look at it, but the photo was on edge, and, like the rings of Saturn, it just dissappeared.

      It's one small notebook.

  59. Call me pi bitch by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

    i'm just gonna be a pi bitch today and make a note on your sig... your last number is 2 however that number should be a 1 unless you are rounding up. Finally my knowledge of pi pays off ;)

    --
    this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
  60. Frelling technology! by ottffssent · · Score: 1

    I bought a 15000RPM hard drive 18 months ago and it was the fastest disk made for almost a year.

    I just bought a laptop. It isn't even here yet. It's already obsolete. *cry*

    I got a ultra-low-voltage P3/933 because battery life is paramount. Now they're making laptops ~2x as fast with half again as much battery life. Huzzah for technology.

  61. Please, moderators push the parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, moderators push the parent up. Good info IMHO.

  62. installing Linux on these systems by unsung · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Interesting stuff. This seems like a pretty nice step up from my current system. Question, would we be able to install linux onto these systems? (Will the generic pentium drivers, ... work) or do all of the drivers still need to be written?

  63. Hydrogen pop by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    I have done it. It makes a sharp noise, sort of a 'park!' or 'yalp!' when you step on a puppy's tail and it implodes, not explodes.

    It was a beaker, not a balloon, however - maybe the air rushing into the beaker to fill the void was what made the noise. Like a whistle, in reverse.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Hydrogen pop by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      PS - the hydrogen implodes, not the puppy.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  64. Re:ITS A TRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot not allow apostrophes in nicks, eh?

  65. Laptop comment metareview by foxtrot · · Score: 3, Funny
    Seems there are two sorts of common comments that show up when Slashdot mentions a laptop:

    • They're too heavy! Make them lighter!
    • Battery life sucks! Make the batteries bigger!


    Well, hard disks aren't getting any lighter, CD-ROMs aren't getting much lighter, keyboards're probably at the ragged edge of weight/reliability, TFT screens only get so light, and so, what's left?

    Batteries.

    Why's laptop battery life suck? Because as batteries get better they use less of them to make the laptop lighter. Why are laptops so heavy? Because if the batteries were any lighter, they'd have even less power...

    I want a nice thick ten or fifteen pound laptop that's got enough battery life to last all day and enough reinforcement under the hood that I can thump users upside the head with it. Lightweight's overrated.
  66. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a recent ruling that some fuel cells could be used in airplanes in the US. Alcohol or butane, I think, not hydrogen.

  67. Astounding Pentium M? by frostfreek · · Score: 1

    an astounding 77 million transistors

    Well it might have been astounding, except that ATI stuffed 107 million into the mighty Radeon 9500 chip, and NVidia crammed 125 million into the phenomenal GeForceFX!

  68. DivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm, I was looking at buying one of these, but I'm not sure if those 933Mhz Crusoe's are fast enough to pull off DivX playback at acceptable quality ? And hopefully, do so long enough to last a movie ?.. Tnx for any info :]

  69. Re:DivX - works great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    yes, DivX/Xvid/mpeg4 plays great on slower cpus. i have an old celeron 333 laptop that it works wonders on. (encoding takes a beefy cpu, but decoding is a breeze compared to mpeg2).

  70. Here's an earlier review! by CrocOS · · Score: 1

    Heh, it surprised me to see the claim that the C|Net review is the first out of the gate: That was posted on 2003/03/11, while Toms Hardware Guide have had this review out since 2003/02/05 !

    Admittedly it is a pre-launch review, but I don't see that anything signifigant has changed since - it was a final chip after all.

    Later!
    -Trav

    --

    I should really get around to creating a sig.... Nah - too lazy =)
  71. Re:Fuck'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save your mouth for the way, use it for what its for. The art of diplomacy worked pretty well when England and France gave Hitler everything he wanted, and he still invaded Poland. Diplomacy is for pussys like you.

  72. Re:Fuck'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "save your mouth for the war, ue it for what its for" mistype.

  73. It's a gimmick by ThresherGDI · · Score: 2, Informative

    Centrino is a marketing gimmick and a gimmick only. I'm sure the parts are just fine, but the whole setup is a marketing ploy.

    Each of the seperate parts of Centrino are very good. The new processor should do wonders for battery life. The new wireless solution should be halfway decent, but it's a commodity part. The motherboard should be solid, as usual for intel. Individually, these parts are worth more than their sum.

    In order to have the Centrino label, the OEM must use the specified Intel mobo, the intel WiFi part, and the Pentium M. If you have a large, paranoid company like mine, you do NOT want the WiFi part. Thankfully, this part is optional, but the computer can no longer be marketed as a Centrino and the OEM loses a certain amount of co-marketing dollars. This is bad for the OEM, okay for the end user (they get what they want), and bad for intel since they don't get to capitalize on all the marketing dollars they spent huckstering the Centrino name.

    For a personal user, say that I want 802.11g or a different video subsystem. If I change out the WiFi portion, the product is no longer Centrino. From my understanding, intel is also taking this stance on using anything other than the included intel graphics subsystem, so if I need a more powerful graphics solution (for games, CAD, 3D rendering, etc) I lose the Centrino label. It is also not clear that you can even USE non-intel graphics. The Register mentioned that ATi was denied a license. Once again, this is bad for the OEM, good for the customer, bad for intel.

    The only time this pays off for intel or the OEM is if the end user buys a stock Centrino unit. That may be a considerable number of people. But my bet is that there are plenty more individuals or corporate customers that only want a part of the package. Additionally, there will be many individuals that will be confused by the new label and not understand that there are other choices available that will give them either more power, or less if that's what they need.

    So, what was the point of putting this package together in the first place? It limits choice, it doesn't pay off in many situations, and it will confuse the customer.

    I guess intel figures if they can establish a brand that encompasses the guts of a laptop, they can control the laptop market. People will ask for a Centrino the way that they ask for Pentiums, regardless of their true merits.

    Why doesn't intel just slap a chassis and LCD on them and be done with it? They seem intent on making laptops. There will be little or no product variation between OEMS.

    1. Re:It's a gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should browse around before making these statements.
      There is an option for the OEM to choose the chipset without the graphics, so they can integrate ATi ,etc.
      Also, the WiFi part is possible to be changed to other, a/g compatible. Just look at the Dell configuration(s).

    2. Re:It's a gimmick by ThresherGDI · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. If I change these parts out, it can no longer be branded a Centrino laptop. So, why try branding a combination of parts?

  74. Are AMDs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... going to ripoff the powerbook style too?

  75. Advertisement! by tekunokurato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Christ, this is not a product review, it's a bloody advertisement. Where's the criticism? Where's the testing? The only person we hear from is the salesperson!

  76. They're all over NYC today (aka WTF) by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    Just like MSN, they have a media blitz going on. I chatted with a presenter at the NY Hilton, and he said that that Centrino is a new wireless technology that is based on 802.11.

    "Do they have a PCMCIA card yet?"
    "No, but they expect to soon."

    Then I read this. You can also try out free 802.11 at 10 different McDonald's locations in NYC with the purchase of a Big Mac or McNuggets.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  77. RE: Whoop-dee-doo. by fshalor · · Score: 1
    I'm still waiting for cheap and reliable PII class 300 MHZ laptops. These things should be like $100 now, brand new. Why the heck do these manufacturers keep shooting for desktop replacements when the need is for mobile *CHEAP* and *DURABLE* alternatives. The software 90% of the people need when moble barely touches the computing capabilities of modern laptops.


    Skrew you guys, I'm going back to my 386. :)

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  78. Sony Centrino notebook - VAIO Z1 by wungo · · Score: 1

    I just saw Sony's new Centrino notebook, the VAIO Z1 Series, while wandering around at BestBuy today. I was little disappointed that this wasn't one of the machines in the CNET reviews--I would've been interested in finding out what they thought of the Z1. The Sony Z1 is definitely one of the cooler-looking machines I've seen in a while. (Maybe even cooler-looking than my Ti PowerBook!)

    The specs that mattered to me: 14.1" screen, 4.7 lbs, CD-RW/DVD-ROM, 2 x USB 2.0, decent keyboard w/ no obvious layout design flaws.

    I'd post a link to the relevant page on the Sony site but the URL had lots of session gobbledygook in the query string.

  79. 2 years? by darkitecture · · Score: 1

    It took Gateway two years to come up with a Powerbook ripoff?

    link.

    Apple just called, they want their design back.

  80. Re:DivX - works great by klui · · Score: 1

    Depends on the size of the image. My 400MHz PII-M runs MPEG4 from CD like a slide show unless I have a tiny little window.

  81. Solar Centrino Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Astronomers announced today that they were detecting only one third as many centrinos as predicted from fusion reactions in the Sun's core. This threatens to overturn current theories of the Sun's energy production.

  82. Re:DivX - works great by fferreres · · Score: 1

    I am pretty it's not 100% bounded. Try increasing the CDROM cache and using VIDIX if you can. If you don't hve vidix try XV. Enable doublebuffering. In mplayer, for a DVD and a 433 mhz celeron notebook i'd use something like:

    mplayer -vo xvidix -q /dev/hdd -double -cache 18000 -framedrop -osdlevel 0 -ao oss -fs -dr -dvd 5 -chapter 1

    Not much left to do, but you can start the server with minimal overhead, like in "X & Eterm" (no window manager) and see if it helps a bit.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  83. Re:DivX - works great by klui · · Score: 1

    This laptop has XP on it and I just installed the DivX codec.

  84. Yes they can, according to the FAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a recent FAA ruling okaying the use of methanol fuel cell cartridges.

  85. Marketing based on case color and cuteness by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Raw specs _are_ important. But Apple has always been the leader in marketing computers based on cuteness and even _color_, of all things - the old crt iMacs in Translucent Blueberry leading a design revolution in computer accessories and revitalized the company for a while, and then the radical "other translucent color options" and the also-radical "black and white too!". Then there's the semi-cuteness of the LCD iMacs.

    The MHz business isn't about comparing engine horsepower - it's about comparing engine RPMs, ignoring transmission gear ratios. Total power is still important for many applications, though as you point out, not for all of them, and sometimes low cost or low power use or small size are the trick.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  86. Re: Whoop-dee-doo. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    So is this why I can't find my old 486/33 laptop in the house anymore? Where's it at? :^)

  87. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    I've seen people with new children before, they go from ultra happy to
    looking like something out of a zombie film in about a week.
    -- Alan Cox about Linus after his 2nd daughter

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...