All languages have had their purpose, and quite often sucessfully implement that purpose. If you're only going to be writing AI or list processing programs, then McCarthy's LISP or a variant such as Scheme may be just the thing.
No one language is really suited to every single application, at least not easily. When learning at a University level, I found Ada to be exceptional. It is (fairly) strongly typed, provides support for data abstraction, object orientation, concurrency, and teaches good programming style as well as introducing all of the important features of imperative languages.
Would I write games in it? Hell no.
I'd obviously use C++ and DirectX these days. If I was writing distributed applications, I'd probably use Java.
Something like Haskell incorporates features for infinite lists, which is great if that's what you need. Although many of its language features evolved from Miranda.
My point is that there are languages that suit everyone. Functional languages are extremely inefficient when compared to imperative languages, and imperative languages can be fairly complex.
As for BASIC, well Kemeny and Kurtz managed to introduce time sharing and programming to the greater masses, at a time when programming was still a mystery to most.
It got me interested to pursue a career in IT, and I'm grateful for that. If I'd come across ML, Ada or Prolog when I was 5, I'd probably be in an entirely different career.
Not that they actually program the games themselves. They find a game that looks half decent and just buy it off the people who actually know what they're doing. This is reminiscent of the whole deal with Norton. Norton made something good, MS ripped it off, Norton sued, MS bought them out.
Hey, I'm not suggesting that this is the wrong way to go about it. If I had copious squillions of bucks I'd probably do the same. However it just makes me wonder whether or not they'll start bringing out games that they're slaved over themselves.
Seems unlikely.
At the same time, I daresay Sony didn't have much to do with development of their games either.
Slashdot Mirror
All languages have had their purpose, and quite often sucessfully implement that purpose. If you're only going to be writing AI or list processing programs, then McCarthy's LISP or a variant such as Scheme may be just the thing.
No one language is really suited to every single application, at least not easily. When learning at a University level, I found Ada to be exceptional. It is (fairly) strongly typed, provides support for data abstraction, object orientation, concurrency, and teaches good programming style as well as introducing all of the important features of imperative languages.
Would I write games in it? Hell no.
I'd obviously use C++ and DirectX these days. If I was writing distributed applications, I'd probably use Java.
Something like Haskell incorporates features for infinite lists, which is great if that's what you need. Although many of its language features evolved from Miranda.
My point is that there are languages that suit everyone. Functional languages are extremely inefficient when compared to imperative languages, and imperative languages can be fairly complex.
As for BASIC, well Kemeny and Kurtz managed to introduce time sharing and programming to the greater masses, at a time when programming was still a mystery to most.
It got me interested to pursue a career in IT, and I'm grateful for that. If I'd come across ML, Ada or Prolog when I was 5, I'd probably be in an entirely different career.
Each to their own.
Not that they actually program the games themselves. They find a game that looks half decent and just buy it off the people who actually know what they're doing. This is reminiscent of the whole deal with Norton. Norton made something good, MS ripped it off, Norton sued, MS bought them out. Hey, I'm not suggesting that this is the wrong way to go about it. If I had copious squillions of bucks I'd probably do the same. However it just makes me wonder whether or not they'll start bringing out games that they're slaved over themselves. Seems unlikely. At the same time, I daresay Sony didn't have much to do with development of their games either.