Slashdot Mirror


Another Xbox Anatomy Lesson

Keith writes: "Icrontic.com has taken apart, examined, and modified an Xbox. In their latest article, they point out some debugging leads on the Xbox, and a possible USB hack. The Xbox is looking more and more like a PC." A lot of the investigation here is incomplete; watch this space, because it won't be long until Xbox surgery is commonplace.

495 comments

  1. A Xbox is just a PC by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's what I have to say

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by WereTiger · · Score: 1

      Didn't everyone know this? games are essentially written for a slightly (if at all) modified version of DirectX8 from what I read somewhere.

      which is a good thing, since that means the time it'll take to port HALO to PC should be very short. I'm just hopeing they revise it from feedback from the X-Box first.

      The Xbox being a PC inside really isn't a bad thing anyway, except it brings up the price. this way total know-nothings can play PC-quality games on their TV too :)

      --
      If you're hearing rhetoric about Linux, open source, or Mac and everyone's bashing Microsoft, you've found Slashdot.
    2. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Solokron · · Score: 0

      Of course it is. And it is quite ingenious of Microsoft to bring developers to a home entertainment platform that utilizes that modified DX so that they will bring more software titles to the PC and with that, sell more PCs, which means MS gets to sell more of Windows. :)

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    3. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by WereTiger · · Score: 1

      Wow, i didn't see that coming, didn't make the connection.
      damn MS is smart, I'd mod you up but I'm a karmaless kiddy

      your point really does make me think though.

      --
      If you're hearing rhetoric about Linux, open source, or Mac and everyone's bashing Microsoft, you've found Slashdot.
    4. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Grell · · Score: 1

      freelinuxgames = /file/dev/mouse eh?

      Nice maneuver there slick.

      Real neighborly.

      I don't know what would irk me more, you being an M$ fan w/ a little linux knowledge; or you being a linux user w/ the same mentality as the goatsex link crowd.

      Either way, nice attempt.

      (thank Zod for USB mice :)

      --
      ...when it gets down to fundamentals, do what you have to do and shed no tears. Dr. Matson in Tunnel in the Sky
    5. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Solokron · · Score: 0

      Yes and your reply got a higher score then it. :) Figure that one out. ;)

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    6. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Shafik · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I would not hold my breath waiting for a Halo port although, I would bet eventually someone will come up with a X-box emulator for the PC.

      It is kind'a funny everyone talks about how easy it should be to port X-box games and don't realize the real potential is in an emulator.

      I mean the thing is basically a PC anyway, regardless of the changes they have made if they can make a PS2 emulator then it has to be easier to make an X-box emulator.

      With the controllers being USB if you have a PC you should basically have an X-box as well.

      I personally think this whole "it is like a PC therefore it is a huge advantage to developers" is in reality a huge disadvantage for MS, since if I can obtain an emulator and the controllers plug into my PC, what is the advantage of getting an X-box again?

      my $0.02

    7. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, Bungie doesn't sound overly optimistic about getting a PC version out the door soon, although they committed themselves to making it, their current reassuring comment about the status of getting Win32/Mac version out the door is, "We honestly haven't had the time to plan the Mac/PC versions yet."

      Of course how much of this is technical and how much is MS pressure to lay off on other versions of this "Only for XBox" title is yet to be seen. And even if it is in DirectX 8, there will be a chunk of work getting it to OpenGL for the Mac version, although they could just outsource it to The Omni Group like everyone else:)

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    8. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Funny
      "I don't know what would irk me more, you being an M$ fan w/ a little linux knowledge; or you being a linux user w/ the same mentality as the goatsex link crowd."

      I actually found that link insanely funny. If you're such a low user number and you fall for that old trick... hehe... Hope you're not admining anything important....

    9. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by anothy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Xbox being a PC inside really isn't a bad thing...
      it's not that it's bad, more that it's inefficient. PCs arn't optimized for games. they use an Intel x86 chip, which is very burdened with legacy code and crap. the x86 chip is favored in the desktop world not because it's good, but for compatability. when that's not an issue (as it's not in games), the x86 begins to look alot less interesting compared to things like MIPS (in N64 and PS2) and PowerPC (in Gamecube, and Macs).
      and it's even a low-end PC: it's a fairly unimpressive processor, and they're not even using the highest end video cards available, which is, of course, crucial for a game console.
      the use of DirectX is another thing, however. in terms of PC compatability (not interesting to me, since i don't use M$ ever, but it's still a market factor worth talking about), it helps alot, and that's really apealing to a game designer. the problem is the M$ doesn't know crap about portable code, so DirectX is pretty closely tied to x86 architectures, without major work. which is why they put an Intel chip in there, which costs them in terms of performance. which does not look good to a game designer. it remains to be seen whether they made the correct tradeoff.
      what i'd like to see is someone design the game interfaces around something more cross-platform, like OpenGL. that'd open the way to more games on more platforms, and PCs running varous OSs. but most console makers don't want that. M$ was willing to "compromise" with DirectX because they own the only other place it runs, too! (excluding small, not-really-relavant-to-the-market hack jobs for other OSs, with poor performance and not-quite-finished functionality)
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    10. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by geomcbay · · Score: 1

      While I would agree that there's a lot of cruft in the x86 that isn't needed for a console, the XBOX backs the CPU up with extremely impressive coprocessors for video and sound (+ networking + a few other things).

      How can you say they aren't using the 'highest end video cards available'? They are using a chip that is slightly superior to the GeForce 3 for video, plus NVidia's custom multimedia/audio solution which blows every 'consumer' level PC audio solution out of the water.

      Even if 'PCs aren't optimized for games', the XBOX, with its PC-like architecture and all is currently the most powerful console on the planet, and will be for the forseeable future...Any developer who isn't deluding him/herself or in some 'strategic' relationship with another console manufacturer will tell you that.

      Of course, that isn't really what matters, the success of failure of the XBOX will hinge on whether developers make use of that power to create compelling games that people want to play.

    11. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. If the video so unimpressive, why does it outperform both the PS2 and gamecube in almost all features?

      2. The point of DirectX is for the developers. Yes, MS wants developers to be happy. There are big books on how to use DirectX, and there are fairly mature development tools for the Xbox already. Contrast this with the PS2 which saw many developer complaints about hard it was to develop for.

    12. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...very hostile,

      based on each product's mfg specs. of course they're all padded, but no one seems to be fighting the fact that the xbox has more performance ability.

      hell, just look at what the xbox can do resolutionwise on an hdtv.. the ps2 can't come near that.

      nice try, but your argument didnt cite anything proving me wrong.

    13. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does 'performance ability' have to do with video output capabilities? Big deal..they let you output to YGB/Component for the DVD. This is still not 480i or 1080i. The HDTV is doing all the work, not the game console.

      I've played PS2 on a 60" Plasma screen and the images were all superior to a 'standard' tv/monitor.

      You're still talking out of your little brown hole.

    14. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's even a low-end PC: it's a fairly unimpressive processor, and they're not even using the highest end video cards available, which is, of course, crucial for a game console.

      Say what? What video card would you, o great hardware designer, have chosen?

      DirectX is pretty closely tied to x86 architectures, without major work. which is why they put an Intel chip in there, which costs them in terms of performance. which does not look good to a game designer. it remains to be seen whether they made the correct tradeoff.

      Well then I suggest you talk to game designers and programmers! They love the XBOX. Do you know why? Because it's fscking fast and they can make better games.

    15. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I've heard that Halo has a year contract to be only available on the Xbox(tm).

    16. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Meleschi · · Score: 1

      the xbox has a unit to output an hdtv signal. This means the xbox is rendering a significantly higher resolution image, since the resolution of an hdtv is higher than the resolution of a standard television....

      HDTV is not doing all the work.

      --
      Meep Meep!
    17. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Ok, why don't you go to someone's house, a friend who owns a PC perhaps, and try comparing the performance of a game running at 640x480 with the same game/configuration running at 1024x768. Well, did you notice a performance hit?

      It's okay, you don't have to pretend any more. You should whack off to Regis's little brown hole during the commercials of Who Wants to be a Millionaire, like you used to, instead of posting the screed of a profoundly retarded man using your fresh new WebTV terminal that you bought from Walmart for yourself as an early christmas gift.

    18. Re:A Xbox is just a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u can talk u ugly white trash son of a lesbo whore dog ass licking cunt sack.

  2. Slashdotted already by turbosaab · · Score: 0

    Damnnnnnnnnnnnnn it would be nice to be able to read the article. Anyway, given that the XBox is really a very inexpensive Microsoft computer, who thinks Microsoft is going to come out with different XBox flavors aimed at people besides gamers?

    1. Re:slashdotted already by Weird+Dave · · Score: 1

      Wow, google's really running slow today, huh? I usually get all my latest CNN stories from there, then I post back to slashdot from another cached google page.

      --

      Grumble, Grumble
    2. Re:Slashdotted already by Weird+Dave · · Score: 1
      who thinks Microsoft is going to come out with different XBox flavors aimed at people besides gamers?


      Each "flavor" will be a different color, but will have the exact same internals, just like they do with their other products.
      --

      Grumble, Grumble
    3. Re:Slashdotted already by Mario21 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...who thinks Microsoft is going to come out with different XBox flavors aimed at people besides gamers?



      Never. It's common information that MS is selling the box cheap to get more cash on the games. If you're buying the box but are not going to buy the games, why should MS give a rat's ass about you? Actually it's kind of ironic - microsoft is selling the xbox so cheap that the cruelest thing a microsoft-hater could do to microsoft is to go out and buy the box and use it just for cd's, dvd's and stuff like that. That would mean no profits to microsoft.

    4. Re:Slashdotted already by damiam · · Score: 5, Informative

      You really need the pictures to do it justice, but here's the text:

      The Guts

      [picture of xbox w/ cover open]

      Here's what awaits you under the hood. If you've come this far, you have now voided your warranty, congratulations. After this, just take out the hard drive and DVD-ROM and you're in.

      [pictures of two IDE hard drives]

      Microsoft is actually using two different kind of hard drives in the Xbox. One is a Seagate ST310211A U Series 5 10GB hard drive. That's right - 10GB, not 8GB like Microsoft claims. The second kind, which is the kind we got, is the Western Digital Protege WD80EB, which is a 5400RPM 8GB drive. The Western Digital drive is not listed on Western Digital's website. It appears some people are getting the 8GB Western Digital drive, while others are getting the 10GB Seagate drive. We tried plugging the hard drive into a normal computer. No operating system will recognize it. No surprise there, it's probably a proprietary filesystem. This will be pretty easily circumvented, however, and you should be able to hook the Xbox hard drive into your computer and get files off of it. I'm working on a program to do this.

      [pictures of motherboard]

      Microsoft is nicely silk-screened on the motherboard. How cute. Also note how there is a silk-screen for additional memory. There are two more silk-screens on the back of the motherboard as well. Apparently Microsoft sent out development kits, which had 128MB of memory instead of the 64MB of memory that comes with the retail kit. That's what these silk-screens are for. Perhaps Microsoft will release a future version of the Xbox with more memory. If you're a very skilled solderer you could actually solder additional memory chips onto the motherboard. I was also surprised to find that there was no shielding on the power supply unit, and no active fan on the CPU.

      [next page]

      Motherboard Features

      [pictures]

      Here's the little riser card the controller ports plug into. Chances are you can modify this to connect some kind of USB hub to it. We're still working on it.

      [picture of circuit board]

      Notice the "DEBUG" silk-screen? I wonder if shorting that lead lets you enter the BIOS. We still have to test this.

      [pictures of power cables]

      The Xbox has an AT power cable.

      [next page]

      Onboard Chips

      [pictures of chips]

      The nVidia MCPX3 Southbridge and a Samsung DDR memory module (specsheet located here). The nForce uses AMD's Hypertransport technology.

      [picture of chip]

      This is the Conexant video encoder chip, which performs DVD video decoding.

      [pictures of heatsink and GPU]

      Underneath the heatsink lies the nVidia XGPU, the video GPU of the Xbox.

      [picture of Celeron]

      Intel has their BGA mobile Celeron 733MHz with a 133MHz FSB on the Xbox. It's impossible to take out without some serious modification.

      [picture of thermal paste on motherboard]

      We took off the thermal pad that was on both the GPU and the CPU and put some nice thermal paste. Now it's ready to be overclocked :).

      [next page]

      Back of The Motherboard & Conclusion

      [pictures of back of motherboard]

      Here's the back of the motherboard after we took it out. Note the two silk-screens for additional memory.

      [picture of tape]

      These little pieces of tape are on the back to prevent the board from getting scratched by the metal casing.

      [picture of ATA100 cable]

      And last but not least, we tried to substitute an ATA100 cable in for the Xbox's ATA33 cable. Unfortunately, this did not work. The Xbox would not even show an error message after we did this. The motherboard can support ATA100, but Microsoft must have the motherboard programmed to only allow the hard disk to run at a certain transfer setting. Too bad.

      That's where we are right now. There is a lot of potential here for hacking this machine. It can be done. I think the debug trace will open up a lot of options once we learn how to use it. This COMPUTER does have a BIOS, and there must be some way to get to it. It's also possible to wire in a USB hub into the controller riser card. We're still working out the wiring for this, and once we get it to work we will share the process with you.

      I think it's definitely possible to upgrade the hard drive. I'm planning on ghosting the data to another drive. I'm sure someone has already tried this, and if you have please email me and tell me if it worked or not. What we're also going to try is upgrading the DVD-ROM. We're going to put a computer DVD-ROM in the unit, plug the ATX power connector into a running computer, and plug the IDE cable into the DVD-ROM. Hopefully it will accept the new drive. Chances are it won't, though.

      Microsoft appears to have hard locked what kind of hardware is allowed on this machine. That doesn't mean it can't be hacked or tricked to allow upgrading. It's only a matter of time before someone figures it out. The Xbox IS modifiable, we just need to figure out how.

      If you're interested in modifying your Xbox, or if you would just like to chat about your Xbox, please check out our Xbox forum. I will be monitoring it and giving advice and tips to help you modify your Xbox. Please share what you've done so we can figure this thing out!

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with karma whoring as long as it's useful.

    6. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDs, DVDs, Linux box...

      If anyone reverse-engineers the format, people will be able to write games for it without paying MS a cent. Doing so is legal in at least the EU. That'd hurt MS to the tune of a few million.

    7. Re:Slashdotted already by CityZen · · Score: 1

      >I was also surprised to find that there was no shielding on the power supply unit, and no active fan on the CPU.

      Regarding the CPU fan: it's got a big one. It just happens to mounted to the chassis right behind the heatsink. Of course, it also happens to be the system fan.

      Regarding the power supply shielding: there's no need for it since the box is not intended to be opened by the consumer.

    8. Re:Slashdotted already by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Actually, the cruelest thing you could do to them is to observe that it's a PC with a half-decent GeForce card in it (that will soon be outclassed by PC gamer cards) and pitifully inferior video buss bandwidth further hobbled by a unified memory architecture... yawn... get a PS2 or an old Atari or, hell, the board game 'Monopoly'... and forget about them entirely.

      Considering them irrelevant and technically backward hurts them FAR worse, even if it is true. And the XBox is technically backward- frame rates are poor for a console, and it's early days to be talking about reliability. Don't waste your time on the silly thing. Buy paintball equipment instead- now that's a game ;)

    9. Re:Slashdotted already by aka-ed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it's true that MS is losing money on the hardware, any purchase of the hardware will help them achieve the exonomics of scale that will allow them to reach break-even (or even profitability) on Xbox. By the way, this is standard console practice; the Playstation 2 was also a loss leader at its intro:

      Driving down production costs will be a determining factor in profitability over the next five years. According to most estimates, Sony's PlayStation 2 cost the company $450 per unit upon initial production in early 2000. The company had first sold the machine as a loss leader for $360 in Japan and for $300 in the United States and Europe. The strategy paid off with the first Play Station because Sony was able to reduce the product's cost from $480 in 1994 to about $80 now (it was initially priced at $299 and is sold at about $99 today). Meanwhile, the company sold about nine games for every console. That model allowed Sony to make billions of dollars over the life of the PlayStation, even if it lost money at first.

      source: Red Herring

      While estimates say MS will lose $2 billion on hardware before break-even, much of that could be recouped in games from Day One, and the hardware should itself become profitable relatively soon.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    10. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And last but not least, we tried to substitute an ATA100 cable in for the Xbox's ATA33 cable. Unfortunately, this did not work. The Xbox would not even show an error message after we did this. The motherboard can support ATA100, but Microsoft must have the motherboard programmed to only allow the hard disk to run at a certain transfer setting. Too bad."

      The cables are backward compatible, all an ata 66/100 does is add extra wires between the data wires, HD pin count is still the same. These guys don't know what they are talking about.

    11. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are the XBox uses a different pin-out than a standard IDE drive. Maybe they swap some pins around to make life difficult for the hacker kiddies.

    12. Re:Slashdotted already by Recolada · · Score: 0

      Not easily modifiable. The drivers for the hardware are hardcoded into the OS. I've been to a couple tech talks about XBox. The kernel has been hacked up real nice for low overhead. Why have a HAL for an OS where all the hardware will essentially be the same?

    13. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is very true for Sony who does their own manufacturing, but Microsoft contracted out all the manufacturing to Flextronics, I think, at an unreleased but the price is believed to be in the range of $350-400 per unit, which will make it difficult to achieve cost savings from scale. Most of that cost savings comes from much less expensive hardware, what is the cost of the hardware in a PS1? It will take some time before the XBox is that cheap to make.
      Also note that the current estimates for the gross margin on the X-Box including games is about half of Microsoft's current gross margin. I think it is set for the future envisioned by .Net, one in which PCs are not the most common access point to software.

    14. Re:Slashdotted already by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      We tried plugging the hard drive into a normal computer. No operating system will recognize it. No surprise there, it's probably a proprietary filesystem. This will be pretty easily circumvented, however, and you should be able to hook the Xbox hard drive into your computer and get files off of it. I'm working on a program to do this.

      Won't dd(1) work for this (assuming the drive is standard IDE, Linux -- you can substitute your chosen *N?X of choice -- will recognize it as a device on boot, and Microsoft doesn't have any anti-HD-modification stuff in place)?

      # dd if=/wherever/your/xbox/drive/is/plugged/in of=/better/drive/you/want/to/put/in bs=8g count=1

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    15. Re:Slashdotted already by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      Are we confusing the X-Box with the iSmack?

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    16. Re:Slashdotted already by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      Note: I realized after the fact that this won't work (unless Microsoft is even dumber than I thought) except if you want to put in a faster small HD.

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    17. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crippled by a UMA??? Are you nuts? This is one of the best things about the Xbox. When NVIDIA gets everything worked out properly having an UMA (nForce) will be such a good thing. Need to do a readback of the z-buffer or want to write into texture memory? Currently you have to cross the AGP bus, but soon you will have direct access. UMA is the way of the future !

    18. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is this a 0 but the parent is a 2??????

    19. Re:Slashdotted already by t · · Score: 1
      Except for the fact that the hackers will be devoting much time to turn this into the next iopener or such. The similarity to regular x86 hardware will only help. Once that happens, bye bye profits.

      t.

    20. Re:Slashdotted already by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Come on, t. The hacker community isn't that large, unless you count hax0rs who couldn't turn a torque screw. The Iopener was a "netpliance," and never has any "netpliance" gotten anywhere. Even the one designed for dumbed-down access to AOL died a messy death -- not because of hackers, but because there was no market. Those things aren't needed or wanted.

      Gamers are a huge market, hackers are a drop in the ocean.

      If gamers reject the Xbox, and go with GameCube, then hackers might speed Xbox's demise (just a little) by buying boxes without buying games. That scenario seems highly unlikely; Xbox, so far, looks like a success (but then, so did Dreamcast after its intro).

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    21. Re:Slashdotted already by t · · Score: 1
      Already there is a story right here on /. about mame on xbox. And when I said hackers I could have said hacker. It only takes one individual with too much free time to make something that is easily accessible to everyone else. What's going to happen when someone makes a linux iso for the xbox with dhcp and such to make a (shudder) beowulf cluster. Or those crazy bastards who want a way to boost their seti-type scores. There is a linux port to the dreamcast that would have been cool had the ethernet adapter been readily available.

      The iopener had problems because of the hw hackery and license that they attempted to require with it. It wouldn't be suprising if the xbox needed zero mods to make it useful.

      I've even heard about how the PS/2 was initially hampered because people in japan wanted it for a cheap dvd player. It doesn't sound very realistic but if it is...

      t.

    22. Re:Slashdotted already by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      I appreciate your point, but the numbers still don't add up. Certainly, if a lot of people buy the Xbox just to play DVDs on, that will delay profitability, but not sufficiently to negate the gaming bucks. MS prevented this by putting DVD controls into the (extra $$$) remote control unit.

      Gaming is still a much bigger business than the DVD busines, and both still dwarf the numbers of people likely to attempt what is clearly a difficult hack.

      The M.A.M.E. emulator is not a "hack," it is a program that runs in the Xbox development kit environment. And it won't work on a standard Xbox -- as the author states:

      "Unfortunately, only registered XBox developers can legitimately obtain this software (okay, apart from the fact that only registered XBox developers actually have an XBox that can run the software)"

      The Xbox itself will be hacked, but not easily. And how many of the few actually skilled hackers will pay $300 to build their custom box when an Nforce motherboard and a phat Athlon are about as cheap?

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  3. X term by SETY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could this be used as a (relativly) cheap X Terminal?

    1. Re:X term by Weird+Dave · · Score: 1

      No.

      --

      Grumble, Grumble
    2. Re:X term by damiam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now that would be sweet - an XBox as an XTerminal. However, you probably don't want to have to look at everything on a TV, and it's cheaper to get an old Pentium computer with a network card.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 486 66MHz computer with a 384MB hard drive and 16 Megs of RAM.

      Now Microsoft sells the XBox for $299.00
      I'll beat that price and sell you my computer
      with Linux installed for the low low price of $250.00

      It's priced to go.

    4. Re:X term by Henry+Stern · · Score: 3, Funny

      Microsoft X-box: $299
      Linux: free
      Turning a lean, mean, gaming machine into a $20 x-terminal: priceless

    5. Re:X term by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 3, Funny
      BUT in combination with network card you can use this as:

      X server

      DVD 2 DivX grabber :-)

      Beowulf cluster of these for SETI ;-)

    6. Re:X term by samj · · Score: 2, Funny

      The USB has been hacked to prevent the use of standard PC devices. If this has been done well then it'll be very difficult to use Xboxes as X-terminals, but that almost certainly won't stop you from using them as cheap network servers. For example, even if we can't get other OS's running on it, we could just port apache and friends over - all they need is disk and network access. I think the future of the Xbox in non-gaming applications is looking fairly good. I'm definitely looking forward to building and MS sponsored rack full of Xboxes pumping out web pages for me :)

      Having said that it looks like the USB may not be that difficult to hack. I figure the boot process will be the next thing that needs attention.

    7. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, can we get Microsoft to subsidize our relatively cheap X terminals?

      :-)

      Whoever manages to get the kernel running on these really has given MS a kidney puch. MS is supposed to lose something like 1 to 2 billion dollars selling the systems...and by God, I want some of that going towards my new Linux box.

      Unfortunately, getting information on the video chipset is undoubtedly going to be rough.

      Random link o' the year.

    8. Re:X term by Jennifer+Ever · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert on the subject, but uhm... shouldn't that be a relatively expensive X Terminal? Cus I've seen X-terms for like $20-$60 before, so...

    9. Re:X term by Victors+Monster · · Score: 1

      Well if it has this fast parallel memory access, it should make a great box for doing intensive GIMP - or better, CAD type applications. Even better if one could hack a bigger hard drive to it. Or, if it's fast enough, get at one over a network.

    10. Re:X term by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Well, with all due respect, if you're going to drop $400 ($600 in Canada) on hardware for a remote X terminal, I'm sure you can do better than to support Microsoft in order to buy a game console, and then, instead of using it for its intended purpose, using it as a display.

      There should be some better options for dumb terminals out there, don't waste your money supporting MS to run OSS.

      --Dan

    11. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft looses money on every Xbox they sell. Approximately $100. If every person who reads /. bought an Xbox and no games, it would hurt Microsoft. Are you a karma whore or just a stupid dick living in a cave who hasn't read the other twenty Xbox related articles in which people explained how every Xbox is sold at a loss?

    12. Re:X term by smackmonkey · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, because it doesn't run LUNIX!!!!1!
      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of X-Boxes though...

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    13. Re:X term by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      Can't get any looser than Microsoft.

      Loser.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    14. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's incorrect. It would be illegal price dumping if Microsoft sold their XBoxes for less than their marginal cost. What they are doing is selling for less than average cost, but above marginal; they total sum of money they are losing is at most the initial fix costs they incurred to start producing XBoxes. What this means is the more XBoxes people buy, the sooner Microsoft will be able to get *out* of the hole, *not* the deeper they get in it.

    15. Re:X term by smackmonkey · · Score: 0

      Don't mod me down as a Troll just because we both love the same 'alternative' OS.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    16. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MS is supposed to lose something like 1 to 2 billion dollars selling the systems...and by God, I want some of that going towards my new Linux box." You total wanker. By God, you need a fucking good shoeing.

    17. Re:X term by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      Bollocks to that, it'd make a brutal cheapo webserver.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    18. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Dreamcast?

      Cheap second hand and it has a version of Linux. VGA capable with a simple lead. Getting the ethernet module is the only problem, they're a bit rare.

    19. Re:X term by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      xterms are about $400 to $600 new - not including monitor.

      they're not cheap capital wise, the benefit is fire and forget, zero maintenance, less admins needed to tinker and care for workstations. (it breaks, just throw another in it's place).

      --paulj

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    20. Re:X term by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      >Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!

      I know it's off-topic (and a faux pas) to reply to someone's sig, but really!

      I don't see the left wing instituting secret, Star Chamber tribunals, or asking libraries to dispose of public records. Maybe I'm missing something, but I think the right is doing a good enough job without our help.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    21. Re:X term by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      * X server
      * DVD 2 DivX grabber :-)
      * Beowulf cluster of these for SETI ;-)


      Wait... that last one doesn't have the letter X anywhere in it...

    22. Re:X term by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Er... Running Linux. On an Xbox. How is this a waste of effort?

      /Brian

    23. Re:X term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beoXwulf...

      Its a new concept.. Bill Gates invented it... along with Open Source.. and the internet.... and the original DOS...

      oh yeah.... thats right...

  4. Its not even a bloody console~ by nervlord1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look at it! the hard drive even has a red to one IDE cable for gosh sakes, its a PC that looks like a console, what a clever company though, get a pc, package it as a console and call it the most advanced console ever (altho they did ignore the diffirence between RISC and CISC chips)

    smart company, shitty product

    --
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating
    1. Re:Its not even a bloody console~ by themks · · Score: 1

      ...and they also ignore the difference between a PC and a CONSOLE.
      A PC will never be a console 'cause a PC is a "general porpouse" machine and its hardware is not optimized for gaming.
      This won't mean PCs suck on gaming, this only means consoles can do the same job with less hardware and (in the most of cases) software.
      Microsoft, with the Xbox, killed the very unique PC architectural advantage: expansion.
      If I can see right, there are no expansion slots, so I'm getting a PC with everything integrated in mother board and no possibilities to upgrade the "hardware core" (GPU, CPU...).
      Still I don't understand why Microsoft has decided to use a "customized PC" instead of a real console architecture designed from the ground up: they have the engineering (if they dont't have it, they can buy it ;-]) , they have the resources, they have the money for creating something really new, but they don't...
      I want to say Microsoft only one thing: "MSX".

      Bye.
      -=|MkS|=-

    2. Re:Its not even a bloody console~ by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Still I don't understand why Microsoft has decided to use a "customized PC" instead of a real console architecture designed from the ground up: they have the engineering (if they dont't have it, they can buy it ;-]) , they have the resources, they have the money for creating something really new, but they don't...

      Sony spend billions designing the PS2 hardware, and they had lots of experience. Microsoft wisely decided to avoid that expense.

    3. Re:Its not even a bloody console~ by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Look at it! the hard drive even has a red to one IDE cable for gosh sakes, its a PC that looks like a console, what a clever company though, get a pc, package it as a console and call it the most advanced console ever (altho they did ignore the diffirence between RISC and CISC chips)

      It's a console because it has fixed specs. That makes all the difference in the world. Writing technology-pushing 3D games on the PC is hell, because even simple things can fail between different driver versions on the same card.

  5. slashdotted already by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

    site's slashdotted - google cache dont have it.

    --insert joke about Icrontic running xbox here--

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  6. USB Hack? by clinko · · Score: 1

    Possible? VERY MUCH SO. It's already been done to the PS2 for less than 20 bucks.

    This site has tons of system hacks.

    1. Re:USB Hack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's very irresponsible to use Slashdot to do your dirty work of getting hits for your own site. Why wouldn't you just post the link? It just shows the level that people will stoop to for some hits...

    2. Re:USB Hack? by clinko · · Score: 1

      because I searched for it on my site and I discussed it earlier. I can also post the link faster that way. It's amazing how much you care about trivial things. I feel sorry for you. heh

  7. Slashdotted??? by Dark+Legend · · Score: 1

    K, is this site being Slashdotted already?? I can't get on.. bah!

    1. Re:Slashdotted??? by Weird+Dave · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was running the website off of my palm pilot, and the battery ran out! D'oh!

      --

      Grumble, Grumble
    2. Re:Slashdotted??? by Weird+Dave · · Score: 1

      Your comment touches me deep inside my belly button.

      --

      Grumble, Grumble
    3. Re:Slashdotted??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not my finger....

  8. Legal Action? by r0ach · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah, Who wants to place a wager on wether or not Microsoft is going to try to take some legal action against the authors of that article for reverse engineering their proprietary hardware?

    --
    -- www.RoachMcKrackin.com
    1. Re:Legal Action? by Jburkholder · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Xbox 8 of 42 in sector 47 Alpha reports an unauthorized modification attempt underway!"

      "Initiate counteraction response 1432 Delta!"

      "1432 Delta counteracation successful. Unauthorized technology modification attempt terminated."

      "We are the Borg. All attempts to modify our proprietary technology have been reversed. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile, have a nice day."

    2. Re:Legal Action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot needs to allow the wagering of moderator/karma points for situations like these.

    3. Re:Legal Action? by markyd · · Score: 1

      Who modded this as interesting? Its just plain stupid. They can't sue you for taking the lid off a box you bought, poking around a bit and taking a few photos.

    4. Re:Legal Action? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      They can if you clicked 'ok' to their licence agreement...

    5. Re:Legal Action? by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Borg, schmorg.

      That little play works better in Cylon voices.

      --Blair
      "By your command."

    6. Re:Legal Action? by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      As I recall, the Cylon's only interest in humanity was to fly around and shoot at them (mostly exploding dramatically).

      No, no... there is something much more insidious about Borg's MO. Turning you into one of them while wiping out the one's they can't assimilate. *That* is evil.

      Cylons are just chome-plated target drones.

  9. HardOCP have their review up by tacit · · Score: 5, Informative

    HardOCP have also ripped the guts outta the xbox, and their server seems to be a bit more responsive as well.

    Plus I trust the hardocp guys a bit more than the average "look maw!Ii'm on the interweb!" reviewer

    1. Re:HardOCP have their review up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that link seems to be wacked too, Jethro.

    2. Re:HardOCP have their review up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The HardOCP review is really a much better article than this one. It really screams of "Hey look, I can take apart a box. Look at my ads!"

      The guy who posted the Icrontic article obviously doesn't know what he is doing. He mentions that he's surprised to find that there's nothing covering the power supply. It's a consumer electronics device; why exactly would there be a seperated power supply?

      It also claims the Conexant CX25871 Encoder is the DVD decoder, which is completely wrong. A quick Google Search would show you that it is the HDTV/video encoder, which would explain its close proximity to the output headers.

      He also claims to be working on reading whatever is on Microsoft's proprietary filesystem. I really don't forsee any progress coming from an obviously half-assed website run by a bunch of teenagers.

    3. Re:HardOCP have their review up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus I trust the hardocp guys a bit more than the average "look maw!I'm on the interweb!" reviewer

      Actually HardOCP started out in that very fashion. It was a static html page with no interface and ugly unorganized html. OCP actually stands for "Overclocker's Comparison Page". It got the job done, promoting the celeron 266 and the "blow hole". It sure has come a long way since its inception.

    4. Re:HardOCP have their review up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of which is true...and now we should consider which site /. recommended...um...the crummy one?

    5. Re:HardOCP have their review up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very, very true. Did you notice the icrontic guy wondering what would happen if he "bridged the debug header"? Maybe a secret menu will come up! Also he claims there is no CPU fan. I guess the fan doesn't count if it's right next to the CPU instead of bolted right on top of it.

      I hope he doesn't do it. I hope his Xbox survives. I don't know why I'm being so generous in this comment. I think your "half-assed" assessment is probably also a little generous - icrontic is more like quarter-assed.

    6. Re:HardOCP have their review up by smackmonkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You think you're so good just because you're all netted up to the interweb. Not everyone's a geek, you know. Some of us go outside from time to time.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    7. Re:HardOCP have their review up by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Has he tried 'mount -t ntfs /dev/hdd /mnt/xbox'?

    8. Re:HardOCP have their review up by yivi · · Score: 1

      Also Vans Hardware opened the box, and is showing its entrails.

      Besides, isn't /.ted yet.

    9. Re:HardOCP have their review up by istartedi · · Score: 2

      I really don't forsee any progress coming from an obviously half-assed website run by a bunch of teenagers.

      And you're posting this... where?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:HardOCP have their review up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Icrontic is an awesome site for a certain crowd and it's no new thing. For instance, it used to host Paul's ABIT KT7 FAQ (if you have no idea what that is, then you're nowhere near this 'certain crowd'). "look maw!Ii'm on the interweb!" is a bit far-fetched.

      BTW, keep in mind that this was a preliminary article... I for one will look forward to its sequel.

      --one of many loyal Icrontians

  10. Playstation Games? by Nathdot · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if the XBOX is just a PC what are the chances of hacking it so it can use bleem to play playstation (PSX) games.

    It'd be fun to see microsoft embroiled in a copyright dispute from the other side :)

    1. Re:Playstation Games? by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 1

      Good idea, but a $300 console, tear it apart and make it a $100 console. If you want to play PS games on it, go buy a PS2.

      --


      My sig of choice is Marlboro
    2. Re:Playstation Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleem sucks. Try ePSXe or CVGS.

    3. Re:Playstation Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feh. Just use Mandrake: Gaming Edition, it's clearly superior to those pathetic consoles.

    4. Re:Playstation Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad bleem! is out of buisness.

    5. Re:Playstation Games? by smackmonkey · · Score: 0, Troll

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    6. Re:Playstation Games? by molli123 · · Score: 1

      I think it will be possible to do things like playing PSX via bleem, installing Linux and so on on a XBOX. It is a PC, nothing else- and there sure are many guys trying to to so because of the Label Microsoft.
      It is more fun to install Linux on a MS-Product than on a Dreamcast. It is also easier because it is just a normal PC- perhaps a little bit more expensive ;-)

  11. GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In other console news, Hong Kong has hacked the gamecube into playing pirated games burned onto MINI-DVD or CD-R formats. They have developed a CD/DVD addon and use the Gamecube's expansion ports to implement it.

    Pretty quick if you ask me.

    1. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha!

    2. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any links? Seriously, I think the only things preventing the GC from playing full-sized CD/DVDs are the small area where the mini-dvd goes (can bypass by removing the plastic case), region encoding (bypass with hacks), and placement on the mini-dvds of bad sectors (much like the PS).

    3. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      They have developed a CD/DVD addon and use the Gamecube's expansion ports to implement it.

      Pretty quick if you ask me.


      Actually took a while considering the number of parties interested in near-free games for it. Japan has had the GameCube for several weeks.

      Considering how serious Nintendo was about halting piracy, its kinda scary how quickly they cut through the security. Still took them a few days. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    4. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by JodoKaast · · Score: 1

      Does pirating a GC entail getting the addon?

      In other words, is the GC like PSX/PS2 pirating or like DC pirating? Do I have to have a modchip, or does it just matter in the way you burn the actual disc, like the dreamcast?

    5. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believed regular sized (5 inch) CD media won't fit in a GameCube, so you probably need the addon.

    6. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by codehead78 · · Score: 1

      Good thing Nintendo makes money off the boxes... I wonder... how much more is a gamecube in Hong Kong because of piracy? (I'm too lazy to look)

    7. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirating is gay and i hope all of you guys that pirate get caught and locked up into jail u fucking cheap asses

    8. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^^hahaa, this fag pays escalated software prices because people like me play for free, Ima lmao at this queer son of drag queen dike while I count all the money I saved by not buying games :) !!!!!!!!!!

    9. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant wait!!!!

      never modded any system. hope i dont screw it up.
      where ya'll planning on buying the disks from?

      are the disks ya'll gonna get from ritek? http://www.cdmedia-dvd.com/shopping/cdmedia/dvdr.h tm

      Please reply..

    10. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck You I know you will be working for Free... when your bitch ass mom pimps your ass on the street.

    11. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      penis go on da pop pop make me wanaput my vagina inside of the penis and lick it

    12. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pirating games = no games u moron...

    13. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Furino · · Score: 1

      you guys are all gay, just buy it you cheap bastards,suck my dick faggots. I think you are all carpet eaters. Fucking get a job, and calm down bitches.

    14. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Rai · · Score: 0

      "its a me, mario. and my lawyers a say witha tha DMCA, we a gonna make a da heads a roll!"

    15. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've bought several games and all except Settlers IV either crash my system regularly or just plain SUCK.
      Unless developers start to make fun games instead of technical games which only appeal to spotty pale 15-year olds, I won't be buying any more games (well.. except when a new Roller Coaster Tycoon or Settlers gets released).

    16. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modchip's go out and actully buy the games you cheap bastards

    17. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you work at Nintendo(tm)?

    18. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't think HK people have the knowledge to hack game cube...

    19. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my dog is smarter than you.

    20. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man... you are stupid... you think "HK people" don't know enough"? You are one of the most ignorant pieces of (remembering other post about vulgarity)... poo i have ever seen. I Won't get into it, but HK is a big part of most 'scenes'.

      Never doubt HK.

    21. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      And the fact that the laser simply cannot read past the outside edge of a Mini-DVD. It's not a standard drive.

    22. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Asians account for a very large percentage of piracy, and are generally the ones to get the ball rolling when a new console comes along, they have some of the best reverse engineering electronics buffs in the world.

      I mean come on, go to Malaysia and see how software is sold there. When seeing that much blatantly illegal software for sale everywhere, maybe some people would realise how minor the western pirater is, unless they are selling cdrs on a street corner.

      Most people who copy games, do actually buy many games, I mean you get a manual, a real inlay and original cd. It's like people who leech music all day, most of them buy hundreds of albums, it's just so you can have the REAL thing, not a fake. And show your support to the authours.

      This allows buyers control over what they buy, many buy the same amount of games/albums a year as they did before they started pirating. The difference, they buy more good games/albums now and less crap games/albums.

      When you spend $40 you want quality software, there are too many companies pumping out quickly knocked up shoddy games that aren't worth the price of a $0.25 cdr, let alone $40. These companies usually manage to sell these by the millions, usually through a massive ad campaign and months of internet hype building.

      As for Gamecube piracy... Even if you could pirate the games today, so??

      Whatever way you look at it, not many are going to enjoy the benefits. I mean at LEAST you'll really need a dvdr drive($400), media ($5 each), modification of the game cube (needs non-standard screwdriver to just open the casing-$9). The the add on drive - will theses addons be available in any high street in the western world? No. Will they be expensive and hard to get? Hell yeah.

      Already it's getting complicated and expensive, and thats before you consider the actual copy protection used in the cube. Nintendo have wanted there machine to be extremely hard to crack since the beginning of it's development cycle. Why? Because it's a selling point to software companies. Cracked now? No. Cracked in one year? Maybe.

      Most home cable connections aren't really that fast at all anyway. Not of a speed that would make sharing of such games realistic, anyway.

      Let alone the fact that hardly any people will actually be able download these things, like full dvd images of films or PS2 games, you need to know 'people' to get stuff like that, you can't just pull it down off a web page.

      Just forget about Gamecube piracy. It' simply not realistic at the moment.

    23. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn good post.

      in my oppinion, u should buy games u like. piracy of decent games is just foul. i only play copies of games i will play for an hour.

      i buy far more oriognals than the average person- over 20 ps2, 50 psx and over 100 audios cds stand by my bed. so as someone who plays copies of a few games, but has lots of origonals, am i good or bad? in my oppinion, the only bastards here are those who don't buy any games.

      completely off topic but hey...

    24. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GameCube is not going to be sold in HK...

    25. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every 1 game you buy legit, you can pirate 1 maybe 2...

      Pirating takes work. You think there is a public site advertised that allows you to download any game of the entire library? NO. On IRC you have to fight for queue position, or find the right fserve, or download 30 files to combine into 1, it's work.

      Stop tossing free around like it's air we're ripping...

    26. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IRC? BAHAHAHAHAHA! Fserv kiddie.

    27. Re:GameCube Piracy now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually use Fserv's.. what a LAMER!!!!!

  12. 100 gig hard drive by nihilist_1137 · · Score: 1

    thats all i could think of when i saw the standard hard drives in there. 100 gig's. Say that would hold a lot of music.

    Then i saw the heatsink and thought overclocking. Overclocking the xbox and changing the components to fit your own needs. Sounds a little open source to me.

    1. Re:100 gig hard drive by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Run Linux on it, and with the built in broadband, it could be used as a decent MP3 player maybe? It has Dolby certified audio output if I remember correctly, which would be great to run through a home theatre system

      That would be pretty cool to see... a game console that doubles as a self-contained MP3 player/server...

      So when is this Linux for X-box coming out? heh

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:100 gig hard drive by moooooooo · · Score: 1

      BeOS on it would really annoy Microsoft.
      from the hardware spces looks like BeOS would work fine on it.
      cheers
      peter

    3. Re:100 gig hard drive by SonCorn · · Score: 1

      well remember that Microsoft is responsible for OSS's existence.

      --
      What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
    4. Re:100 gig hard drive by spectral · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was thinking of how to get the divx codec on there, and have it play vids over my lan.. I might have to pick one of these up :)

    5. Re:100 gig hard drive by damiam · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 10 gigs?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  13. Cheap render farms? by Zergwyn · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The Xbox has some pretty good hardware, and the price is very good. Microsoft is selling it at a loss, I think around $100 per unit(of course, they have plenty of cash so losing money doesn't matter as much as gaining market share). This could make them quite cost effective price/performance wise compared to just buying stuff off the shelf in a cheap pc. I read somewhere awhile back that someone was trying to make it so the PS2 could be used to render stuff, and the Xbox is supposed to have slightly better hardware power. If the Xbox can be hacked to run linux(shouldn't be a big deal, since it is supposed to be a lot like a PC), and get some more connections stuff(like with this USB) then it may be worth getting one/few to connect to a network as an extra GPU. Linux being an OS of choice for the MS Xbox. Mmm, that irony smarts doesn't it...

    1. Re:Cheap render farms? by MagPulse · · Score: 3, Informative

      $300 Xbox
      -----------
      $300 733MHz P3 + 10mbit ethernet

      $100 1.33GHz T-Bird
      $100 Motherboard
      $70 20G HD
      $50 case + 300W PSU
      $30 Linksys 100mbit ethernet
      -----------
      $350 1.33 GHz Athlon + 100mbit ethernet

      Xboxes are cheap, but not that cheap. My numbers are my guess of pricewatch * 1.5, which is what I usually end up paying. With the Xbox you're also paying for an NVidia chipset close to a GF3 with TV-out and controller(s?).

    2. Re:Cheap render farms? by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1

      You're missing out on a few components here. Add in some ram and a dvd drive (with hardware decoder). That should add $50 - $125 (depending on how much ram) on to that $350. Of course, costs could be cut nicely by buying a lower clocked processor, or maybe a duron.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    3. Re:Cheap render farms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, you forgot the (higher than) GF3 which in itself costs like $200...

    4. Re:Cheap render farms? by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      Okay, I forgot RAM, which is cheap. But you don't need a DVD drive, the original poster was suggesting using the Xbox for a render farm.

    5. Re:Cheap render farms? by bubba+dick · · Score: 1

      You don't need a graphics card for a render farm f00(!)

    6. Re:Cheap render farms? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      And a GeForce3 gfx card -- which will cost as much or more than the XBox. Even as part of a rendering farm, you'd want the GF3 doing the gfx work instead of the PIII.

    7. Re:Cheap render farms? by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course, but some people are retards and think they can 'render' quality 3D scenes in realtime with the latest NVidia gear, which is aimed at the Campersniping 12-year-olds market and not the professional 3D graphics market.

      Hardware accelerated graphics cards ARE used in a lot of professional compositing, but then that's not really rendering, is it?

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    8. Re:Cheap render farms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually know what a renderfarm does, and how it works?

      Hint: Don't need a graphics card....

      Regards

      Me

    9. Re:Cheap render farms? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      why the fuck would a render farm box need a GF3? much more sensible to make it headless. You clearly have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:Cheap render farms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can the Xbox be used to play video games?
      I know the idea sounds far out, but it has all the hardware inside that would make a killer game machine.

      It might even be possible to play DVD's.
      Has anyone tried this yet?

    11. Re:Cheap render farms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superb idea Zergwyn, but I'm thinking a little bit different.

      First, (not directed at you, Zergwyn, but those other MS complainers) drop your anti-MS attitude. If MS wants to take hits for giving us cheap hardware, go on ahead. To me, those are plain ol x86 boxes with a big X on the front. Dont like the case? Then repackage it into a small tower or a desktop. However, I DO like the box... they stack nicely :-)

      2: 20 Gigs is a decent amount for a file server. Samba/FTP/NFS anyone? Or how about a TV player for those nice DIVX movies you download, it matches your DVD player.

      3: I've played around with Beowulf clusters a while back, course they were 486's and 586's. Just too slow for my taste. Buy 3 or 4 xboxes, install linux (which will prolly be coming out soon) and do a little clustering. Gives good X-perience too (cough, bad pun).

      4: Can anybody say "Quick DVD to DIVX conversion"? After you implement a cluster, you can offload cpu jobs to that boxen. I figure 2932 mHz of cpu power and 256 MB of ram (if you don't 'upgrade' it). If that isn't your style, there always is 3Dsmax for your nice rendering. Or if you like Maya (or can afford or find it), I believe there are bin's out there for running a client off from them.

      Well, I don't know why exactly people are against MS's business plan. If their ware is cheap, then I'll buy. Simple as that.

      Krale

    12. Re:Cheap render farms? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Because the GF3's video rendering capabilities FAR outreaches anything a CPU can do.

    13. Re:Cheap render farms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, renderfarms are used for high quality animation, ie high res, and massive polygon count needed for tv production, never mind the cinema.
      GF3 will not help, as its frankly useless for this scale. Why do you think SGI and Sun machines are used, rather than PCs? Why also do you think these machines are mainly headless?
      I've used GF3 cards for creating animations, and its laggy at low quality texures, with low polygon count, in small windows.

      Were not taking about q3a with 8 lights, small textures, and a low polygon count.

      Regards

      Me

  14. That was a quick /.! by Solokron · · Score: 0

    Read the subject.

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  15. Different Hard Drive Brand... by guru_steve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's Funny.

    From the other Slashdot link to techtv , the innards of the Xbox show a Seagate hard drive. This one, however is a WD. Different brands of HD in different Xboxes?

    I would think that kind of odd - wouldn't it be cheaper to just use one brand?

    1. Re:Different Hard Drive Brand... by guru_steve · · Score: 1

      oops. knee-jerk reaction to looking at the picture.

      looks like the article mentions this fact.

    2. Re:Different Hard Drive Brand... by edmudama · · Score: 1

      actually no, it is cheaper to have 2 suppliers incase one f's up you can still ship your product

      nobody smart goes into volume production with a 1x1 supplier matrix

      --
      More data, damnit!
    3. Re:Different Hard Drive Brand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was mentioned in the article if you did read it.. There are 2 different sizes of drives with the xbox, an 8gig seagate, and a 10gig western digital drive.

    4. Re:Different Hard Drive Brand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [H]ard|OCP's version has the Seagate in it too. I wonder how many of each are/were made? Do you think it's something like a 50/50 split?

  16. I saw the X-Box playing... by kypper · · Score: 2
    wow... speed is incredible. Dead or Alive 3 is REALLY smooth.


    I'll wait for the emulator. I figure if a PC is running it, it won't be hard to make MY PC run it :op The more people take it apart, the more I believe this to be true.

    1. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1

      The reason it's so smooth is that all XBox games are fps-locked at either 30 or 60 fps. This results in a very smooth and consistant image, as opposed to the occasional jumpiness you see when you go between 30 and 60 fps (your mileage may vary). You can test this out by pulling your favourite Quake3 engine game and typing in the "com_maxfps " command into your console.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    2. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by KFury · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regarding PC ports, I wouldn't be surprised to see an emulator come out pretty quickly. As long as Microsoft can build into Windows (maybe it's already in XP?) a way to enforce the copy-protection mechanism of the discs, they should have no problem with people without X-Boxes trying to buy and play games for their PC. It just means $100 Microsoft saves on X-Box hardware.

      The reasons against are support and development issues. That is, you can make a much cooler game much faster if you know exactly what hardware with what capabilities each user will have. That said, if someone goes out and makes a PC port, and it's recognized that all guaranteed-compatability bets are off (as was the case with Connectix's VGS), then it shouldn't be that hard to write it, and if it sells more X-Box games, then Microsoft probably wouldn't have a problem with it either.

    3. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by kypper · · Score: 1
      only 30-60? Bah... my pc can do much better than that ;o)


      But regardless, the gaming is smooth. people want that, for whatever reason.

    4. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by griffjon · · Score: 2

      I'll be laughing my ass off if it turns out that even with a hardware lockdown, XBox is programmed to DirectX and that provides portability back to (MS-running or emulating well) PCs.

      I agree, tho--the longtime advantage of consoles was their lack of variety--every console (of the same model) had the exact same hardware config, so you could (if you cared) program very unportable games that ran the hardware to its precise limits to give awesome performance. It also provided stability, as there wasn't that infinite permutation cluster of hardware conflicts and differences.

      As consoles get closer to stripped-down PCs, I wonder if this will change?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    5. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by bubba+dick · · Score: 1

      Who gives a toss? The difference between even 30-45 is inperceivable. Remember regular TV is what, 24 fps? And my TV has never looked choppy.

    6. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What can your TV do? :-)

    7. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by TheBigDinK · · Score: 1

      If you believe that there's not a difference between 30 and 45 (or higher) than you're just wrong. It's not even a matter of opinion.

      Things on TV and movies have blurring in the frames that help make up for the low framerate.

      I myself rarely go see movies and when I do, bright spots really bother me at first because I can see the flickering and stuttering of the image. But that's what I get for being used to 85 Hz.

    8. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      TV is 29.97. Film is 24 fps. Silent film was 18 fps, which is why early transfers gave the impression that everything in the silents is "sped-up."

      But there is a discernible difference in quality at rates above 30 fps. That's why Imax comes in two flavors, 24 fps and IMAX-HD®, which is 48 fps.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    9. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      TV is 60 frames interlaced (60 half-frames per second), unless you're using PAL instead of NTSC, then it's 50 frames interlaced. movies are 24 frames per second, but are generally double-shuttered or triple-shuttered, so that you're actually seeing 48 or 72 "frames" per second. Movies have choppiness during long pans, or have you not noticed?

    10. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by Corrado · · Score: 1

      This is *precisely* why I only play games on consoles! I despise not having the required system components, even if the hardware is brand new! It always seemed like the games I wanted to play would require me to upgrade my personal computer (video card, hard drive, controller, etc.). ARRRGGGGHHH!!!

      This is why consoles rule. Of course, if someone made a great console that ran Linux I would snatch it up in a heartbeat. But, for now I guess I will just have to get an XBox (without games) to stab MS in the eye. :)

      --
      KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    11. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by imroy · · Score: 1

      I believe the term you want is "fields". PAL TV has 50 interlaced *fields* or 25 frames per second. Because of the combination of some weird refresh frequencies (I'm guessing) NTSC actually has 29.97 fps, not 30. So NTSC has 59.94 interlaced fields per second.

    12. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by Osty · · Score: 1

      59.94 == 60 for sufficiently large values of 59.94. Close enough for government work. And "half-frames" and "fields" are just different words for the same thing -- only half of a frame (even or odd lines) gets refreshed each time. One frame consists of two fields or half-frames, which may be slightly out-of-sync in time. Two frames back-to-back are comprised of a total of three fields (sharing the "middle" field). Thus, jagged/fuzzy objects when moving horizontally, and flattened or elongated objects when moving vertically (you have to pay very close attention to notice these effects, and the horizontal effect is more noticeable than the vertical, but they're there).

    13. Re:I saw the X-Box playing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not close enough if you're doing professional video. If you're doing NTSC-encoded video with timecodes, you "drop" a timecode frame every so often to make up for that difference.

  17. dvd rom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does anyone have a dvd burner and have they tried running burned copies of games on your xbox? What is the file system of the xbox hd?

  18. For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...slashdot sure seems to have blown its collective load several times over since the XBox's release.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  19. Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by The_Dougster · · Score: 0, Troll
    ( Putting on MS-bashing cap )

    Now we not only have to contend with their infuriatingly buggy and hideously bloated software, but now these frelling x-boxes have arrived to supply the world with game consoles which can run their shoddy wares.

    Well I hope these things don't crash at inoppourtune times like their PC games are renowned for doing. I can't even fathom how many times a windows game crashed on me right before or as I was saving it.

    Maybe since they have the line on the hardware they can get a reliable machine working. I sure hope so, they can use some help.

    The #1 reason why I ever started using linux was because of games constantly crashing on pc's and little or no support forthcoming. Not that linux doesn't crash occasionally, but at least I can fool myself into thinking I'll go into the source code and fix it myself if I have to.

    Who's gonna issue patches for x-box games? Nobody

    --
    Clickety Click ...
    1. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      Well I hope these things don't crash at inoppourtune times like their PC games are renowned for doing. I can't even fathom how many times a windows game crashed on me right before or as I was saving it.

      Interesting... I hope they DO! Microsoft is entering a new world here, and they'd better have a rock-solid product. People may put up with Windows crashing twice a day, but console owners will not. Doesn't matter how much of a loss they're selling it for, if it's buggy, they're toast.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    2. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      That line about console owners not putting up with their consoles crashing is bunk.

      People used to BLOW in their Nintendo carts to get them to work!!!!!! Same with Atari.

    3. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're blowing out the dust, same as you remove dust from a disc, I think they're refering to the games themselves, oh and the demo units crashing was apparently due to idiot employees at the stores not the game produces... according to the guy at THQ who gets paid a lot to like the X-Box...which was more like shoddy work by M$/demo coders

    4. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a difference between broken hardware and broken software. In microsoft's case, they always seem to release the broken software. Blowing into your old 16bit console wouldn't resolve a software problem.

    5. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by cdalemx · · Score: 1

      dont get the wrong Idea I once ran windows 3.1, 95, and even the horid "me" and faced the most odd program crashes that made acid trips seem boaring. . but really I feel out of tuch with people that say windows crashes all the time now days because it simply does not crash much at all with windows 2k and XP . . it is pretty dam stable. And when people say .. "blab blab bla>> blue screen of death. . bla bla bloated software buggy. . etc . ." I just feel out of tuch with that realitity microsoft should be criticied for innistialy releaseing such shity software but now can only be considered evial because of their anticompetative practices not for shady software development.

    6. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by xbrownx · · Score: 1

      No, the problem with the demo units was on the developer's side. They included older versions video libraries with the source code, or something like that.

      What did the "idiot employees" do wrong? Besides if it was possible in the first place for an "idiot employee" to cause the system to crash, that means all of the idiot consumers would do the same exact thing!

    7. Re:Great... a proprietary MS pc. Whoop-de-doo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing my part to fight a little FUD...

      The xbox runs a variant of windows 2000. I don't know about you, but most everyone I know eventually gave in and grudgingly admitted that win2k was really much more stable. I still have games crash, but ... its the game. Could it possibly be the game makers fault? Is that why they release partially completed software and then spend 6 months releasing patches?

      I do know that MS' official stance is that they will only allow release (yes they do control title releases) of finished games and that the hard disk is not to be used for patching shoddy releases. We'll, of course, have to see how this works out--but i do at least have a hard disk to hold patches on the xbox. How does something like the PS2 handle a game bug?

      You started using linux because you were tired of games crashing... I can't let this go... do you have less games crashing now because you dont have (m)any games to play? Get real... I'm quite happy to be typing this on a Sun machine, but I'm sitting right next to my Win2k game box.

  20. Microsoft Mistake? by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    Could MS have made a mistake here? Basically, they are putting a (stipped down) PC into a console package. With the console selling less than WinXP (depending on, well a lot of stuff) what is to prevent everyone from re-tooling the Box into a cheap-ass PC? Not to hard even for novices at this point, I'd think.

    Perhaps more is not better this time?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although I'm sure there are a few other obstacles, I think the biggest one is that MS has a proprietary (and IIRC, encrypted) file system on that HD, and according to the HardOCP article, the HDs can't be switched out for an off the shelf one. Also, i don't see how you could reformat that thing, as it certainly won't accept a boot floppy with a copy of fdisk on it.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    2. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by crispy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Similar obstacles have all been tackled by the TiVo hackers. It's very doable once you know the format of the fs.

      --
      My sig has a broken link in it.
    3. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That doesn't make much sense.

      Maybe it can't be made to boot from anything but the hard drive (or some ROM on the board) but the drive can, at the very least, be repartitioned on another system.

      The big hurdle will be getting it to boot the "wrong" OS. I'm sure it is rigged to check, and some sort of ROM update or hacked BIOS will be necessary.

      -Peter

    4. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 2

      Yes the components have been recyled, but no this is not a stripped down PC. It does not have a PC bios and the memory architecture is not modular in a PC way --- everything shares the same memory space for better game performance.

      It will be a few years before your regular PC can create frames as quick as this.

      --

      --- -- - -
      Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
    5. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "better game performance" you meant "decreased production cost", then maybe.

      Games like DOA3 on Xbox lock the framerate at around 30fps so that it doesn't fluctuate, which makes the animation look very smooth.

      My regular PC creates frames at a rate of around 120 per second in Tribes 2 (wow. That was a quick few years). It would seem smoother if I enabled vsync and limited the max framerate, but I like the increased response time that comes with more screen updates per second.

    6. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by Chokai · · Score: 1

      Bingo Karma! I know people who have worked as a temp on X-box. All have reported that it's by no means a PC. All this "oh we are going to hack it!" stuff on Slashdot is unlikely to amount to much without some serious technical ability on the hackers part.

      If you buy an Xbox to hack into a PC the average slashdotter, unless you have unusually advanced technical abilities is paying $299 for an 8gb HDD and a DVD drive and pretty piece of black plastic.

    7. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      What do you expect? This is SlashDot - the land of pseudo-expert armchair 'hackers.'

      If it weren't a hardware hack, maybe someone could have written a script to do it and all the little SlashBots could have h4x0red their X-Boxes using their l33t script executing sk1llz.

      ./configure
      make
      make install

      Does that make you feel like a real programmer?

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    8. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      It will be a few years before your regular PC can do ten frames a second? o_O

      In both Halo and that Gotham Racing game, the reports I read said that framerates dropped to around 10 fps at some points.

    9. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by Malachi · · Score: 1
      Thats what I was thinking that there was a certain amount of 'blessing' the drive would need.

      Of course its early to see whats going to happen but I imagine by late christmas/early spring we'll see it spread wide open.


      -M

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    10. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by tealover · · Score: 0

      Oh, you mean the "reports" from Firing Squad? The "reports" they compiled using a dev box?

      I own both games and I can assure you they don't drop to 10 fps. That may make it difficult for you to promulgate your anti-Microsoft bias, but so be it.

      I can't wait to get home to play Halo tonight. Best gaming experience I've had in years.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    11. Re:Microsoft Mistake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now certainly that isn't true. There is no way that an underpowered Xbox could even compete with the graphical power of my Athlon 1.3GHz, GeForce 3, Audigy and 512MB of memory.

  21. PIII still more powerful than PPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted a list of PPC vs Pentium benchmarks a while back the last time this issue came up that shows the Pentium winning in almost every benchmark (SSE vs Altivec included).

    Here's the benchmarks

    As you can see, a 400-500 Mhz G4 is not "roughly equivalent" to a 700-800Mhz Pentium or Athlon. The G4 gets spanked in the majority of benchmarks and by large margins.

    The idea that the G4 blows away a Pentium is a Mac user fantasy, chalk it up to Steve Jobs.

    1. Re:PIII still more powerful than PPC by AssFace · · Score: 1

      this is classic slashdot - the parent to the post that I'm placing here states facts - and then because they are against the ideals of someone with moderation power at the time - what is a valid and good post gets modded down.

      now had he reversed it and talked about how apple is this and that - but backed it with no facts, it would have been modded up.

      hence why I visit slashdot less and less these days.
      (admittedly I will come back to see this get modded down b/c I dissent)

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    2. Re:PIII still more powerful than PPC by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      how tired - 2 years ago a 500Mhz G3 was 30% faster than a 500Mhz PIII (100Mhz RAM). As a general rule, we find a 733Mhz G4 to be approximate to a 1200Mhz Athlon. And approximate is the best you can ever do with this shit, although it is is probably true that the fastest x86 chip around is faster than the best G4 for most tasks. This situation MAY change with the G5 - the G4 has been a production nightmare. Doesn't make much of a difference to the fact that Apple make top-class computers for real world tasks. That's why people buy them you know...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:PIII still more powerful than PPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More classic slashdot. Someone posts a blatant offtopic troll, which (happily) gets modded down before it creates yet another x86 vs. the world flame war (which would then degenerate into CISC vs RISC, which would then degenerate into "x86 really is RISC", and so on ad nauseum), and someone complains about the freaking moderation. Jeez.

    4. Re:PIII still more powerful than PPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? The Xbox uses a Celeron, not a P3.

  22. Linux port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well in typical Slashdot fasion, I have to ask: How long until Linux runs on this thing?

    1. Re:Linux port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, in typical Slashdot fashion...

      "Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?"

    2. Re:Linux port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [insert something about Natalie Portman and a link to goatse.cx]

  23. Install windows on xBox by ihxo · · Score: 0

    can someone install windows on Xbox so everyone can now have a PC for 300 dollars :)

  24. Xbox should make a great little Linux box. by A+Commentor · · Score: 1

    Provided that the modifications required to run Linux, doesn't break the XBOX features, it would be great to have a dual Linux/Console for only $300...

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Xbox should make a great little Linux box. by pyros · · Score: 1

      It's called Playstation 2. Sony sells a kit that includes a 40 gig hd, a network adapter, and a linux distro. It's not availalble in the US yet though.

  25. Multi-sourced XBox HDs? by icemind · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or did the Hard OCP XBox use a Seagate HD? Yet this one is Western Digital. Following my experience with WD I'd wanna be damn sure my XBox has a Seagate in there if I buy one.

    Wonder what the file system is in there too? Unless it's a proprietary one it must be pretty damn easy to upgrade the things yourself (in which case I'd shove in a sizeable Maxtor pronto). Hmm, and for that matter, I wonder how hard it would be to backup the data on the HD somehow? :) Anyone got any insight on either of these things?

    - icemind

    1. Re:Multi-sourced XBox HDs? by icemind · · Score: 1

      Doh, shoulda read the article instead of staring at the pretty pictures. :) Looks like one is in fact a 10 gig and the other an 8 gig. Wonder if it's possible to tell which XBox has which without taking the case off and voiding all the waranties of the XBoxes at your local store. ;) Pity it's a proprietary FS too.

      - icemind

    2. Re:Multi-sourced XBox HDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do these get modded up? He is reduntantly stating something that was already in the article!

    3. Re:Multi-sourced XBox HDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF?

      dd if=/dev/hdxx /stuff/xbox_backup.img

      (:

      the "WTF?" is because i keep seeing people post how? to do this and no one has looked at dd yet?

  26. One major difference by Agarwaen+The+Tired · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All consoles mainly differ from the pc by their Unified Memory Architecture. This basically means that all of the hardware shares the same memory so the latency between the various parts is nearly zero. Basically your graphics card and cpu use the same memory as your sound card. Xbox just takes the top of the line graphics card and eliminates the bottle-neck of pushing numbers to it. Don't kid your selves the first genaration titles look better then PS2 and weren't designed to truly take advantage of all the xbox can do. Later games will look MUCH better. Of course, the true secret is in the sauce. If the games aren't fun what does it matter how much better they look. It's why nintendo is still alive. They make good games.

    1. Re:One major difference by CityZen · · Score: 5, Informative

      First off, the PS2 and GameCube don't use UMA. Both have embedded memories for framebuffer and textures. GameCube also has a separate audio memory (I don't know about PS2). For framebuffer and textures, UMA creates a big bottleneck. You have lots of high-bandwidth demands on memory, and only one memory to talk to. Having seperate framebuffer and texture memories reduces the bottleneck on main memory.

      Also, on the topic of latency, only the GameCube has truly low latency access to memory. Their "1T-SRAM" allows fast random access, low-latency memory access, whereas any system based upon DRAM only has low-latency for accesses within the same memory page. Page misses are relatively high latency.

    2. Re:One major difference by Robert1 · · Score: 1

      Suprising, that games that don't "take advantage of all the xbox can do" have severe slowdown issues when the action gets a little "rough". The games you see right now are as good as they're gonna get. If it starts dieing under a first-gen game like Halo, it just shows you how powerful the system really is doesn't it?

    3. Re:One major difference by slashdot2.2sucks · · Score: 1

      Counter Example:

      Virtual Hylide for the Sega Saturn
      1st Generation game
      more choppy than that raytraced Wolfenstein3D clone on the TI85

      but then 3rd gen games like Virtua Fighter 2 looked great and ran smooth in high res.

      I think the Xbox is a big piece of shit too, but your argument is bunk

    4. Re:One major difference by griffjon · · Score: 2

      I have noticed a total lack in game quality compared to some of the classics. I mean, Civ II is /still/ fun. As are things like Tetris, Metroid, Duck Hunt... even Centipede. Today's games seem to rely on pretty graphics. But seriously, there hasn't been that much change in FPSs since Wolf3d (OK, 3d maps and jumping) that hasn't been in more powerful graphics engines.

      I just want to be back in a maze composed of many small, twisting passages, all different.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    5. Re:One major difference by TheBigDinK · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that nintendo's "1T-SRAM" is a complete lie. It seems like a label intended to become a buzzword among cube fans.

      I've talked to professors and such about it, but the bottom line is that DRAM uses one transistor while SRAM uses 5-6 typically. Sram is much more expensive than DRAM because of this.

      I promise you that the main system memory in the $199 gamecube is not SRAM. The L1/2 cache on your CPU running at a gigahertz, THAT's real SRAM.

      It's probably still much lower latency than, say, the RAMBUS used in the PS2 though.

    6. Re:One major difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, UMA is implemented on all PCs that use the nVidia MB chipset.

    7. Re:One major difference by CityZen · · Score: 1

      The 1T-SRAM is indeed implemented using DRAM at the base level. However, the DRAM is broken down into a large number of small banks operating independently. The actual implementation details are complicated (there was an article about it at EETimes). The only result that matters is that it, for most practical purposes, behaves just like SRAM. Of course, the 1T-SRAM is more expensive than DRAM. It's also not as dense. I'm sure the reason for only 24MB (for the external RAM) on GameCube is due to this.

    8. Re:One major difference by TheBigDinK · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was pretty much how I understood it, as DRAM in a kind of wrapper. (might be a bad word, but hey)

      If the structure offers a performance boost then that's good. But the whole point is that since the implementation is in DRAM, you're still limited there.

      Too bad it can't be real SRAM though. =)

      Like if they made that 4MB embedded super-fast video RAM on the PS2 into 8 or even 16 megs, how sweet that would be.

    9. Re:One major difference by voronoi++ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually idiot,

      The xbox has plenty of bandwidth. UMA is in fact a huge advantage:

      1) When you stream in data from DVD / HD the cpu has almost no work to do to in order to use that data. On other consoles a memcpy() or an additional DMA will be needed.

      2) The cpu can play with anything and everything. This is great for special effects.

      3) Unlike the Gamecube all xbox memory runs the same speed (not all Gamecube ram is the 1t fast stuff).

      4) Segmented ram is a pain the in arse for many reasons, it's often very difficult to get at some ram (e.g. vu0 ram on ps2) this makes debugging seriously interesting...

      5) FYI: there is in practice enough bandwidth to keep a DVD, a HD and the audio DMAs going at the same time as the CPU doing heavy work and the GPU rendering close to max fillrate.

      BTW this is not to say that the Gamecube is crap in anyway. I've had a Japanese cube for a while now & I love Nintendo games (esp Myamoto stuff)! But for speed XBox is king.

    10. Re:One major difference by posmon · · Score: 1

      *cough*deus ex*cough*

      --

      update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

    11. Re:One major difference by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      1) When you stream in data from DVD / HD the cpu has almost no work to do to in order to use that data. On other consoles a memcpy() or an additional DMA will be needed.

      Huh? DVD and HDD hang off of an ATA-whatever interface. This interface is issued commands which are essentially "read this block to address x" or "write to this block from address x". The ATA controller uses the DMA engines in the PCI bridge to access the CPU's memory directly. In this sense, if your OS programs it that way, PCI has always been UMA, and is even on your PC. There should never be another DMA (The data is in memory already, and most machines don't have an independant DMA engine to do copies) and only poor implementations would do a copy. The CPU must still do a load on the data to get it into a register (There will be page faults and cache misses involved) before it can access the data either way.

      If anything an UMA will slow down this process, since the ATA controller will not have any local memory, and would have to use extremely high latency (through the PCI bridge, remember) system memory for performance optimizations that it might do like keeping read aheads or storing device parameters. More likely is that the ATA controller has some small amount of non globally accessable memory onboard or attached to it, and they convienently don't talk about it when they say UMA since it helps performance but they don't want to confuse the consumer.

    12. Re:One major difference by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      There is indeed a separate 2MB of sound RAM for the PS2's sound chip, SPU2 (literally, 2 SPU cores (original PSX sound chip) on the same bit of silicon).

      32MB attached to EE
      4MB embedded in the GS
      2MB attached to SPU2
      2MB attached to the IOP
      2x4KB embedded in VU0 (seperate program and data banks)
      2x16KB embedded in VU1 (ditto)

      Additionally the VU/GS registers, and the whole of VU memory are mapped into the EEs address space. This is primarily for debugging though, as you use really should be using DMA controller to move data around efficiently.

      Sounds complex, but it's not much worse than previous consoles, especially since the debugging support is pretty reliable now.

    13. Re:One major difference by arkanes · · Score: 1

      *more coughs*System shock2*cough*Thief*cough*

    14. Re:One major difference by voronoi++ · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should expand on my statement:

      On most consoles, the mass storage device, can usually only write to main ram. Often due to the hardware being cheap, this either steals bus cycles or worse requires frequent CPU intervention.

      Now in order to do anything with the data, it needs to be shunted to VRAM / Sound ram / etc..
      This burns up extra bus bandwidth, especially since you typically have to do multiple DMAs to multiple destinations, making trickle loading challenging.

      The XBOX on the other hand has UMA, so once you have loaded in resources you can use them in situ.

      Don't forget the XBOX has a rather impressive memory controller (4 banks of quite fast ram / full cross bar / clever internal buffering prioritisation) that has plenty of bandwidth.
      The HD going at maximum transfer rate is really quite a low bandwidth device in comparison with
      the CPU or the GPU. In comparison with the CPU it's quite latency tolerant too (though not as tolerant as the GPU). FYI you can load 40mb off the xbox hd in 2 - 3 seconds in a very fillrate (i.e. memory bandwidth) limited situation with seemingly no adverse affects on the CPU or GPU performance.

    15. Re:One major difference by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      PCI has an UMA. The BARs in PCI config space are used to map the devices into the systems physical address space. This is not anything special about the XBOX. Your 486 DX2 did it. You can always send data directly from one PCI device to another... Say from the hard drive to the sound chip or the DVD decoder. The reason that it is not done this way in a typical PC is not because of special hardware requirements, but because of how the operating system works. There is no simple API in most OSs that makes it easy to say "send this data directly to the sound blaster" because that would require driver cooperation, and typically the drivers are written by different companies.

      I'm not saying that there aren't other components in the xbox that aren't improved by being in the UMA, just I/O isn't one of them. (It's questionable wether the video frame buffer being globally mapped is any advantage since the GPU will be modifying the frame buffer, the CPU would have to modify it asyncronously and hope that it's changes weren't either overwritten, or appeared in the right frame. Also, how much additional rendering can the CPU possibly aid such a powerful GPU with, especially when it's busy with other processing. Come back in six months and we'll find out if this UMA stuff is totally hype or not.)

  27. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And over HailStorm too, for some reason...

  28. One major mistatement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and weren't designed to truly take advantage of all the xbox can do

    Yes, I'm sure MS intended to enter the market with a fully crippled system. That explains everything. This was their plan all along.

    This is a load o' grief.

    1. Re:One major mistatement by newbiescum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the original poster meant that the launch developers were "rushed" to get their titles out, so they weren't able to make all the tweaks that later developers can do. Usually the difference between "generations" of games is fairly vast. Look at the PS1 (yes PSOne) launch titles and look at the ones being released now. The developers have learned in the ins and outs of the system, what it is good at, what it is not good at. They have developed libraries of code to reuse. This is what developers can do with a machine that remains constant for over 5 years.

      On the other hand, since X-Box is basically a PC, I don't know if the differences will be that great after the second generation games. From what I hear, PS2 was hard to program for because of its multiprocessor design, so the differences between the launch titles and today's games are fairly vast since the developers have gotten a handle of things now.

    2. Re:One major mistatement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was trying to make a weak point about the video performance...the rendering. I refuse to believe that the xbox was released with a weak showing of it's video capabilities. That would be suicide.

      Or it would reaffirm the claims that the demos up to the release were rigged. Either way, the statement is a load of E X C U S E for a level of performance that does not exist.

      "The new Corvette will be much faster, once GM's Engineers learn how to wring more out of the great new engine they built but don't yet fully understand!"

      Yeah, right...GM would love that kind of publicity, I'm sure.

    3. Re:One major mistatement by DaveSchool · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ummm.... That's kinda why the 2001 Z06 has 385HP and the 2002 Z06 has 405HP. The engineers had a brand new engine in 2001, the LS6 (based on the LS1, but different intake, and some other stuff), and after playing with it for a year, they made some modifications, slightly different cam profile, hollow valves, and other stuff. They were aiming for 400HP in 2002, but kinda overshot and got 405HP.

    4. Re:One major mistatement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just my opinion, but when I got my xbox home
      and started playing halo I was both impressed and unimpressed with different graphics features.

      I saw some really cool lighting effects, and then I came to "water" in halo. I am positive they could have done better on the "water" and I'm sure they will in the future.

      I do get the feeling that halo was rushed to release, but the game dead or alive 3 appeared to be more polished/finished.

      halo is still pretty fun though.

    5. Re:One major mistatement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for making my point. After playing with it for a year....you think they pulled 20hp out their collective ass's? No, they tweaked the design. Meaning they had a revised engine to work with...they didn't just magically find additional hp hanging out under the hood. They took off the 2000 exhaust system they were forced to use to make the budget for the 2001 rollout and flowed the air box...then they matched the cylinder heads. This means it is no longer a 2001 engine...can't you see?

      The 2001 Xbox is crap. We have to wait for the 2002 Xbox to see if it's more or less crap. In any case, it's no longer a 2001 Xbox. You think MS will tell anyone that buys one they can bring it back next year for the new model? No, just like any chump that buys a new model 'vette...sorry charlie. Thanks for helping us get into the market with a dud.

  29. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...slashdot sure seems to have blown its collective load several times over since the XBox's release.

    And why not? I think MS is irrelevant to the fact that it is indeed a cheap alternative to the PC once we get the internal workings figured out. In these hard economic times, who wouldn't want a cheap PC?

    And what would make us blow our load harder (and Bill Gates top higher) than an article on /. saying that we've figured out how to get linux, a X11 server, and SDL ported onto the Xbox. It would be like shoving a million needles in microsoft's eye when it happens.

    Of course, there is the argument that we're just throwing money back into the devils pocket. Actually though, we're not. MS is taking about $100's loss per unit. With Linux running on it, it would give game developers an alternative to MS licensing on the XBox. You see, every game company that want's to make a game for any console system has to pay the console maker a royaltee on every game they make. So if we get the Xbox figured out, we could really start fucking with MS's head.

    One last reason to blow a load on the Xbox, it's just PC hardware, which I myself really understand well myself. Sure I could be taking apart a SunE250 server, but who has the money or the access to one? Even if you had access, my boss would certainly look at me strangely if I had a screwdriver near anything Non-PC in the enterprise class of hardware.

    Hope you enjoyed that, please aim your load away from me now.

  30. Xbox is just a PC...and that's all it will ever be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of one thing... Sony.

    Sony Entertainment
    Sony Electronics
    Sony PlayStation
    Sony Online Games
    Sony Movies & TV
    Sony Music

    ...MS isn't a pimple on that collective butt.
    S O N Y ] [

  31. No, here's the irony: by Kasreyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Irony # 1: Paying M$ money (buying XBox) in order to run Linux on it. They'll be laughing all the way to the bank. I guess techies will find any excuse to conveniently forget why they hate MS - just offer them tech candy and they submit.

    Irony # 2: Doing #1, then thinking somehow you've won a victory for Open Source. And then, posting on /. about how ironic aforesaid misunderstood course of action is. Joke's on you, my friend.

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
    1. Re:No, here's the irony: by agotneja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 - Not a bad idea, really;
      You get a (presumably) decent piece of kit for less than it cost to buy the individual bits, and, MS actually subsidised it. It actually cost them money for you to get that kit. Could make a superfast fileserver / firewall or whatever, at a remarkably low cost :)

      2 - Bragging about making MS loose money? Sad, yes, but if you can do that and have fun with the goods, I think it's damn good! :)

    2. Re:No, here's the irony: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, joke's on you. If MS sells an X-Box at a loss (in order to make money on the games), and I buy one and install Linux on it, then I win, open source wins, and MS loses. And you loose to, it seems.

    3. Re:No, here's the irony: by manyoso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Irony # 1: Paying M$ money (buying XBox) in order to run Linux on it. They will be crying all the way to the bank! They sell the XBox at a $100 loss so they can (hopefully) recoup there loss from game software which comes in at a nice $50 a pop.

      Irony # 2: The joke is actually on you.

    4. Re:No, here's the irony: by bubba+dick · · Score: 1

      Spelling is good. Lose has one 'o', Loose has two. Spell it out with me now kids! L-O-S-E! Good work!

    5. Re:No, here's the irony: by antic · · Score: 1

      then consider the increase in sales MS will be able to report (sale to linux user == sale to customer). kids see reported increase (and eventual lead over ps2/gamecube), decide that game houses will start targetting xbox, and buy one themselves.

      don't think that microsoft can't afford to lose $100 to a few linux users.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    6. Re:No, here's the irony: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best policy is,....
      don't buy Microsoft Anything
      even as a joke.

      Its just not funny

    7. Re:No, here's the irony: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell the XBox at a $100 loss so they can (hopefully) recoup there loss from game software which comes in at a nice $50 a pop.

      90% of the Linuxboys who buy an XBox to 'hack' on it will also end up buying (or having his parents buy) a half-dozen of those games.

      You see - it's all about the bragging. And this crowd won't be able to resist bragging to both Slashdot and their gamer pals. Bill Gates wins again. The irony is that you're eating his shit.

    8. Re:No, here's the irony: by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      This loser is too loose. Save your breath, Bubba.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  32. heres a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are going crazy over it on the ign boards..

    http://boards.ign.com/message.asp?topic=14363049 &r eplies=30

    1. Re:heres a link by anotherone · · Score: 2

      That's just a discussion... not any sort of proof.
      I still don't believe it.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
  33. Here is a near-future prediction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The XBox will be overclocked.

  34. Ummm....Short memory, people? by PoiBoy · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've now read a total of 73 comments, the vast majority of which have talked about various hacks that people would like to see done. Sure, I agree, being able to hack this XBox into a $300 Linux box would be nice.

    BUT.........

    Just a few days ago there was another discussion at this fabulous web site about hacking the XBox, and several people pointed out that M$ uses various encription techniques in this machine which makes hacking incredibly difficult.

    Perhaps before people start spanking their monkeys for a second time thinking about hacking an XBox, they should recall the discussion following the first article.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:Ummm....Short memory, people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The benefits of hacking the XBox are so great that I'm pretty sure the encryption will be broken shortly, whatever it is. There will be thousands of skilled hackers trying their hands at this. If there's one thing I've learned about corporate pseudo-encryption schemes meant to screw over consumers, it's that they're always broken.

    2. Re:Ummm....Short memory, people? by m2 · · Score: 2
      Just a few days ago there was another discussion at this fabulous web site about hacking the XBox, and several people pointed out that M$ uses various encription techniques in this machine which makes hacking incredibly difficult.

      The harder, the better. It's more fun that way.

    3. Re:Ummm....Short memory, people? by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      There used to be a skiller hacker at my school. He installed NetBus on all the computers in the library. He was only fourteen but he was the coolest guy I ever knew.

      Unfortunately, the principal found out about his l33t NetBus skillz and expelled him.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    4. Re:Ummm....Short memory, people? by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....Product Activation, Digital Rights Management....Yeah, they're hard to crack, but once they're out in circulation it generally doesn't take long for them to be broken. The best people in the field aren't working for Microsoft - they're hacking these things for the sheer hell of it.

      --
      Why?
  35. Port Linux! by krogoth · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm just waiting for someone to port Linux to the X-Box. That would be, without question, the greated console hack ever, difficulty of porting nonwithstanding.

    --

    They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    1. Re:Port Linux! by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      (Net?)BSD was ported to the dreamcast, which used a RISC processor, not x86. Porting linux to the Xbox shouldnt be that hard. Just a bit of hacking to see how all the hardware interacts.

    2. Re:Port Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Porting linux to the Xbox shouldnt be that hard." We eagerly await your ultra-fast developed port. If you *really* have the skills to do this and you reckon it's not hard, why are you telling us?? Get on with it and make it publicly available, then boast about it. That's the problem with /. - too many people who rate themselves as l33t after reading "C for Dummies".

    3. Re:Port Linux! by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      thats not the case at all, i'm just saying that for the gods-who-be, it shouldn't be nearly as difficult as writing for an entirely new architecture.

  36. Leave MS Alone by Megatron12 · · Score: 0

    Leave MS alone, it may be the only thing standing between AOL and complete world domination.

    1. Re:Leave MS Alone by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      AOL, M$, what's the difference?

    2. Re:Leave MS Alone by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      AOL gave us blithering idiots who use teeny-bopper acronyms like LOL and ROFL. Microsoft made computing cool and accessible to the public (note: also a bad thing). Choosing the lesser of two evils is left as an exercise to the reader.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    3. Re:Leave MS Alone by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1
      AOL gave us blithering idiots who use teeny-bopper acronyms like LOL and ROFL.

      Actually, these acronyms, along with BRB, GTG, "smileys" and most of the rest, originated on TDDs. And saying "Microsoft made computing cool and accessible" makes you sound like one of those blithering idiots.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    4. Re:Leave MS Alone by smackmonkey · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for Microsoft, we wouldn't be living in a world where there are more [Western] people with computers than without. Computers would still be too confusing for the unwashed masses, and that would be a good thing.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  37. Talk about fantasy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do nothing but show why the 'speed' argument is dead.

    Your benchmarks have as much to do with performance as the box the computer's are shipped in.

    1. Re:Talk about fantasy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the box as a performance benchmark is pretty much what Mac buyers do do.

    2. Re:Talk about fantasy. by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      Because it's fair to benchmark a G4 against a P3 chip, which only has a fraction of the cache of a G4?

      I want you to give Steve Jobs his crack-pipe back.

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  38. Why do I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...that if MS publicly said, "Sure, knocks yourselves out reverse engineering the X-Box. We don't care." that 90% of the interest in doing this would instantly evaporate?

    Honestly, I don't mean this as a troll, but with the ridiculously low hardware prices right now, not to mention all the PC's /. readers already own, why bother to void your warranty on a brand new X-Box and spend all that time messing around? Wouldn't you be better off watching ESPN, meeting girls, teaching a neighborhood kid how to program, or doing something else fun and/or useful?

    1. Re:Why do I get the feeling... by scorcherer · · Score: 1
      with the ridiculously low hardware prices right now, not to mention all the PC's /. readers already own, why bother to void your warranty on a brand new X-Box and spend all that time messing around?

      Because we can.

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    2. Re:Why do I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because we can.

      Perfect reply! In three words this captures the immature, short-sighted and arrogant mentality of the /. crowd.

    3. Re:Why do I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but hacking the xbox would be learning, you'd gain skill and you'd leave the project with new info. Maybe the better question is, if MS opened up everything would 90% of the people still care to sit down and start working on getting linux running?

      anyhow, you seem to think rotting my brain in front of espn is a better idea.

  39. Why? Because they make money on the games... by Boba001 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft (and all other console makers) sell the actual hardware at a loss and make it up via the software/games. Do they care if someone creates an emulator for the PC that will run X-box titles? Nope... well, they probably would... because people will figure out a way to pirate games and play them on the computer. That's a whole other issue though.

    1. Re:Why? Because they make money on the games... by DefKon999 · · Score: 1

      Not that they actually program the games themselves. They find a game that looks half decent and just buy it off the people who actually know what they're doing. This is reminiscent of the whole deal with Norton. Norton made something good, MS ripped it off, Norton sued, MS bought them out. Hey, I'm not suggesting that this is the wrong way to go about it. If I had copious squillions of bucks I'd probably do the same. However it just makes me wonder whether or not they'll start bringing out games that they're slaved over themselves. Seems unlikely. At the same time, I daresay Sony didn't have much to do with development of their games either.

  40. BOXHACK.COM coming soon... by dedicke · · Score: 0

    Hey - just a note...I am putting together a site to be a one stop shop type deal for hacking the Xbox...I have already added a 40gb drive to a system and got it running - story/pics/etc... coming soon...

    http://www.boxhack.com

    --
    raretshirts.com - cool vintage t-shirts
    1. Re:BOXHACK.COM coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.

  41. so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does overclocking the proc have to do with game play?

    ...n o t h i n g.

    1. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But i'm sure it will sound cool on slashdot

    2. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you overclock LUNIX?
      Or imagine a Beowulf cluster of overclocks?

    3. Re:so? by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      If Gates meant you to overclock that thing he would have given you a Turbo button.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  42. A Microsoft subsidized Linux server. by vscjoe · · Score: 1
    According to estimates published in the press, Microsoft is probably not making any profit on the Xbox itself, and may be subsidizing it by as much as $120/unit, in the hope of making up for it in games sales.

    Wouldn't it be great if people figured out how to port Linux to the Xbox? It would end up being a Microsoft-subsidized Linux server appliance and server farm component. What more can we ask for?

    1. Re:A Microsoft subsidized Linux server. by dakoda · · Score: 1

      really?

      try this fun experiment:
      go to the local super market
      buy a gallon of milk for two dollars
      sell the milk in half gallon quantites, a 75 cents each.
      repeat

      after selling several hundred gallons, look at how rich you are

    2. Re:A Microsoft subsidized Linux server. by dakoda · · Score: 1

      doh, that was quite a mistake on my part, forgetting to throw in the starting capital. my bad, you win =) (note to self: closed mouth gathers no foot)

    3. Re:A Microsoft subsidized Linux server. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every store in my city will not sell an X-Box without purchase of 2 games to go with it. Is that a Microsoft mandate?

    4. Re:A Microsoft subsidized Linux server. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from a hardware OEM background, I think you are being too optimistic here... the guy who is going to lose $100 every set is not going to be MS, but the desperate offshore manufacturing contractors who need the contract to keep his factory running, and the components distributor who need a big customer account to retain his buying leverage.

      These are the poor suckers who absorb the price difference. MS probably sells the units at cost -- no skin off its back!

  43. XBox is a PC is an XBox? by 0-9a-f · · Score: 1

    Why would MS go to all the trouble of building a console which is almost a PC, and then "extend" Windows XP to allow those games to run on a PC?

    Then they have to support two separate streams of game APIs - one into the XBox OS, and another into XP.

    Why not, instead, use the XBox as the games platform, and slowly wean the gaming APIs out of XP (or just plain not develop them any further).

    That way, MS get the gamers using a console (fewer of those nasty CD cracks and copies floating around), while only the "serious" computer user uses the "serious" PC running XP.

    Even if the XBox is hardware hackable to turn it into a PC, how many home gamers are going to turn to hardware hacking and risk losing the use of their console?

    --
    With each breath in, a flower somewhere opens; with each breath out, a flower withers away. In between lies beauty.
    1. Re:XBox is a PC is an XBox? by anothy · · Score: 1

      first of all, if M$ is worried about supporting two different APIs, why not just support one game API... and then supply it on both the Xbox and XP? you guys totally forget about code portability? not suprising, when GNU's answer to portable code is 'configure'. bah. also, there's arguably several other good reasons for M$ to support games on both... like the fact that lots of people will have PCs, or Xboxes, but not both? and it's much more attractive to a game producer to be able to say "look, write to this API, and you can run on XP or Xbox". nobody else can say that today.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    2. Re:XBox is a PC is an XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or how about one api on both pcs and consoles.

      it reminds me of the multimedia computer standards that existed when we all wanted to watch cheetah's run on video clips from our encyclopedia cds.

      ms has in one box a programming api they've spent years tuning and a standard set of hardware... we all know how annoying pc hardware can be as users.. think about it from a game producer's point of view.. mostly they just program for the latest high end pc and smeg everyone else.

      i know i'd feel less sad just popping a game into an xbox than installing the latest kewl game and then spending a half hour of depressing testing with game quality levels.. slowly inching them down until the game plays well and i get no cool graphical features..

    3. Re:XBox is a PC is an XBox? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about the XBOX, but I would assume that the Game API is DirectX or a close relative to it. How can you NOT capitalize on a successful technology like DirextX? (I hate saying it, but I really like the performance of DirectX > 7.1). I think the XBOX is close to DirectX.

      -4 AM - Too late.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    4. Re:XBox is a PC is an XBox? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      Um I for one cannot stand the thought of gaming on something using a crappy low res TV (& even the highest end HDTV running at 720p is less than what I run my crystal clear monitor at for gaming). So your thought about killing gaming on the PC (as frankly billy knows most PC gamers don't run Linux for gaming... & no don't try to say you do, those 50 or so games that run on linux won't satisfy a serious PC gamer), would be the worst possibel thing he could ever think up... & he knows very well it would be that sorta idea, so it's never gonna happen...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  44. The way to get in... by PRickard · · Score: 1

    XBox is looking more and more like a PC because it is a damned PC, with a few tweaks and a TV instead of a monitor. XBox is just a trojan horse to get Microsoft inside the homes of people who don't want PCs. XBox, UltimateTV/WebTV, and the short-lived MSN appliances are/were all trojan horses to get Microsoft through the door and closer to the drawers where PC non-users keep their checkbooks.

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

    1. Re:The way to get in... by sjonke · · Score: 1

      Somebody please mod this guy's post up. After that, go out, buy an Xbox and rather than mod'ing it, take a blow torch to it, thus ensuring a loss for MS. Hurry up, though, before the blow torch is made by MS too.

      --
      --- What?
  45. It's the cheap hardware. by Technician · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot loves hardware that somebody is helping pay for.. It includes everything from hackable bar code scanners (thanks Digital Convergance), pre programmed internet terminals (thanks I-Opener) and now hackable PC hardware (thanks Bill).

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  46. Blah, blah, blah... by bytes256 · · Score: 1
    Duh, um...I know let's port Linux to it!...duh that's brilliant..bet nobody's thought of that yet...especially not on slashdot...and then we could port FreeBSD, and OpenBSD, and of course NetBSD...duh, that'd be really cool...wow, I'd be king of the geeks...that's so far out...

    GET A LIFE!

    Wow slashdot's gone downhill

    --

    Slashdot, the site where everything's made up and the points don't matter
    1. Re:Blah, blah, blah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That assumes there was a hill in the first place.

    2. Re:Blah, blah, blah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the hill. that resides along side the swam.p where all this gas keeps coming from.

    3. Re:Blah, blah, blah... by cdalemx · · Score: 1

      I can't help but laugh at people that POST ON SLASHDOT .. telling people to get a life. . you should get a life . . etc etc . . hehe come on now, deep down you must appreciate the irony at some level? :)

    4. Re:Blah, blah, blah... by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      I think you should have mentioned Beowulf clusters in some way, or at least linked to goatse.cx. You're letting the team down, 256!

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  47. peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. What happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you turn off the Xbox during a write to the HD? Can you corrupt your FS. How does MS get around this? As far as the file system. They are probably using their encrypted NTFS that you can get for 2000 server. So basically without the built in "unlock code" you will have a hard time cracking it. xboxdecrypt@home anyone?
    I'm not sure what encryption standard the 2000 encrypted file system uses that would help at least. As far as the debug points on the motherboard, maybe its a serial output of what is going on?

    1. Re:What happens when by kawaichan · · Score: 1

      What would happen if you turn your PS2 off while it is writing stuff off to the memory card? probalby the same thing would apply to the HD while the system gets shut down.

      --

      kawai
    2. Re:What happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can hear it now: "Daddy, why does my xbox keep running this scandisk thing?"

    3. Re:What happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows users actually have a journaling file system.

  49. BOXHACK.COM coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi - just a note... I too am putting together a site to be a one stop shop type deal thing for jacking the Xbox...

    I have already added a 600gb drive to a system and got it to be running - story/pics/adverts/etc... coming soon...really...I promise.

    HackBox! We take the X out of Xbox!

    [If you can't get in, it's most likely due to the /. effect. This site is the bomb!]

  50. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "With Linux running on it, it would give game developers an alternative to MS licensing on the XBox."

    Actually, it would make no impact whatsoever. But you would have succeeded in wasting countless hours that could be used for a better purpose.

  51. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by newbiescum · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Of course, there is the argument that we're just throwing money back into the devils pocket. Actually though, we're not. MS is taking about $100's loss per unit. With Linux running on it, it would give game developers an alternative to MS licensing on the XBox. You see, every game company that want's to make a game for any console system has to pay the console maker a royaltee on every game they make. So if we get the Xbox figured out, we could really start fucking with MS's head.
    First, not only are you throwing money back into the "devil"'s pocket, you're also creating publicity and support for it. I don't care if MS is taking a $100 loss, but imagine this. Their first console into the market beats out the PS2 and GameCube (incumbant console makers). Wouldn't that be the best thing in the world for them? Think about the advertising, consumer mindshare, etc. And who do you think would own the next generation then and control the next console and set prices accordingly? They certainly are not betting on sweeping out the console market by just using the X-Box. They would be stupid to think so, and much as a few people think, not everyone in MS is a dummy;. They're thinking in the long term when they can add more functions to X-Box 2, 3, 4, and they can control the living room, content side, and everything else.

    Second, do you honestly believe an established multimillion dollar game publisher is going to risk MS's wrath by publishing games that run on the X-Box but are unlicensed? Not to mention the legal ramifications if a publisher decides to skip on the royalties. Sure, I expect the X-Box to be hacked, and yes, we might get PC games to run on it and all of our other software, but I seriously doubt any of the big publishers (e.g. EA, THQ) has the balls to stand up to MS and release unlicensed games designed for the X-Box but not anywhere else and just release it as is. I'm sure that the publishers have some competent developers around that could reverse engineer the consoles, but there's a reason they just don't release unlicensed games.

    Anyway, just some thoughts. I'm not saying that MS's move into consoles is necesarily bad, but this is just a broader strategy to increase their goals of dominating new areas and increase their growth. I also personally do not believe MS has a chance against Sony, and from the looks of things, maybe not even GameCube. Their hardware does look very nice, but I don't know if they can hold out for the long haul without itching to build a new device too quickly.
  52. This story is spam by qslack · · Score: 2, Troll

    OK, put your mouse over the submitter's name (Keith). The link is to Icrontic.com. But that's also the site he points us to in his post.

    I wish the Slashdot editors would check to see that the story isn't just spam, promoting the poster's site.

    1. Re:This story is spam by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      And a lot of good that did... His server's slashdotted to hell!

      --
      I'm a minister!
    2. Re:This story is spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell, more than spam, its not even good spam.

      why can't the va layoffs hit some of these shitty story posters... come on, they took us on a tour of the motherboard and demonstrated they could use a camera and a screwdriver.

      hello? are you that smeggin hard up for a story? we've already seen the inside of an xbox on slashdot and this article had _nothing_ new.

      i would have thought that slashdot could have located some true geeks to hire, but it looks like instead they hired all their friends. maybe va crashing and burning is what va deserves for plain bad business.

    3. Re:This story is spam by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

      If we can get every person who wasted 15 minutes of his* life reading this crap to go and hammer Icrontic.com we could cause considerable damage to Keith's bandwidth bill.

      (* I use the male pronoun because girls can't use computers. Obviously.)

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
    4. Re:This story is spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not interesting.

      Who cares? It's better than the one we saw early on...

      This is why i'm beginning to hate linux and slashdot...trolls who have nothing better to do with their lives than fight everybody about everything.

    5. Re:This story is spam by starfoxmac · · Score: 1

      But if the submission had come from John at XYZ.com, timothy would have posted it exactly the same, and all the readers would have read it exactly the same and posted followups exactly the same. If it walks like a duck... Just because these bits came from their creator rather than a 3rd party reviewer doesn't make them any less valuable, in my opinion. timothy and slashdot in general still comprise a third party that this content had to get through before reaching the public.

  53. "Watch this space" by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    watch this space, because it won't be long until Xbox surgery is commonplace.

    I'm also keeping a close eye on the preferences page for an "XBox" section I can uncheck so I don't have to see these useless stories anymore.

    -Legion

  54. X-BOX/Linux by DigiBoi · · Score: 1

    only a matter of hours before someone has linux hacked onto it.

    "Its not GNU, its X-BOX!"

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat.
    1. Re:X-BOX/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you working on it? Is your port ready? Are we all going to be amazed at how incredible your programming skills are?

      No, you'll leave it to the real techies and then following every FAQ you can find until you get it installed and then brag about how clever and l33t you are.

      God damn. What is it with people on this site? Every other post is "Oooh, it's so easy to port linux to it!" and "wow, isn't it a great toy to hack". For fuck's sake. Most people wouldn't have the first idea of what to do.

  55. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, there is the argument that we're just throwing money back into the devils pocket. Actually though, we're not. MS is taking about $100's loss per unit. With Linux running on it, it would give game developers an alternative to MS licensing on the XBox. You see, every game company that want's to make a game for any console system has to pay the console maker a royaltee on every game they make. So if we get the Xbox figured out, we could really start fucking with MS's head.

    Now this is naive talk. No bunch of linux kids are gonna fuck with MS' head here...

    Microsoft is going to make a profit on XBoxes sooner or later, they just need to produce enough volume and it will become profitable. They're basically commodity PC components -- of course they're gonna be dirt cheap in a few years. The more XBox's you Linux people buy, the closer they'll scale up to profitability.

    Secondly, there's no way it's going to give game developers "an alternative to Microsoft licensing" on the Xbox. Writing a game that actually runs on a non-hacked XBox will require including MS copyrighted signatures with your title (at least if it's anything like earlier consoles), and anyone who publishes a title that hacks around that will see some serious wrath come down on them.

    Finally, game developers are in business, as is Microsoft, and so far they're enjoying working with MS... it's a very attractive platform to work with.

    So fine, see that XBox might be a cheap PC-like box for now, but in a few years it'll be cheaper to buy an equivalent PC. And don't get any delusions of fucking with MS. They'll fuck back harder.

  56. The Fans... by bluephone · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the PS2, and I don't believe the GameCube has fans, but the XBox having 2 fans isn't totally a good thing. We all know that fans are very unreliable in the long run, so unless MS sprang for some very nice (and expensive) all-ball-bearing sealed fans (which I doubt considering how much per box they're losing) I can see more than a few fans failing in a year and some nasty warranty issues. Dust and fans don't mix, and with no filters, and open vents to the outside, I wonder...

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    1. Re:The Fans... by ihxo · · Score: 0

      I don't know about xbox, but nintendo and Playstation have alot of fans :P (not the kind you are talking about though...)

      btw: I think PS2 don't have a fan, coz seems to me that it's not blowing air out anywhere ...

    2. Re:The Fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ps2 has a fan in the back. The GameCube has one on the side.

    3. Re:The Fans... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      Actually the gamecube has a fan on the left side (when it's facing you), It also has venting on both left & right sides... The PS2 is more like a laptop in that it's casing just gets hot...

      No modern system is very cool running & their aren't many alternatives to using fans...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  57. Any EULA with the hardware? by omega9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any X-Box owners out there that can testify to the existance or absence of any sort of EULA for the hardware? Microsoft is somewhat famous for their software EULAs, would it be so supricing to find one on the X-Box?

    I've looked at the boxes they come in, but short of buying one I haven't been able to check out the included liturature. Perhaps one of you can stop gaming/hacking for a moment and actually read the paper waste that came with the box.

    Not that it will make a difference one way or the other. But you figure they have to know there's a hacker community out here just waiting to rip this thing apart. If not, I'm sure it will be a real i-opening experience!

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:Any EULA with the hardware? by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

      hell, there is an EULA for some MS Optical Mice....

  58. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    "In these hard economic times, who wouldn't want a cheap PC? "

    1. Xbox are in high demand. It doesn't matter how cheap its going to be, good luck in getting one.
    2. If you have to do major changes to the hardware, then you have enough skills to build a computer for about the same as a Xbox. Its not all that powerfull inside, Celeron 733/8 gig hd/dvd.
    3. It would be much better to work on the Gamecube or PS2. Make another system better.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  59. Different hard drive sizes by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    The buzz over the newsgroups about the two different hard drive sizes has been pretty intense the past few days (8 vs. 10 gigs). I'm not quite sure what kind of cost differential we're talking about at this point for two gigs, so you'd have a hard time saying some of the consoles should be cheaper.

    One interesting thing, though, is that it seems like all of the consoles have the standard "50,000 blocks" of memory to save games and music on the XBox. Where are the additional blocks for the 10 gig system? (Or less blocks for the 8 gig?)

    1. Re:Different hard drive sizes by bparrish · · Score: 1

      The XBox lists on the memory screen that it has 50,000+ blocks.

      Someone on alt.games.video.xbox tested theirs by loading as much music as they could onto the system. They were able to fit about 312,000 blocks worth.

    2. Re:Different hard drive sizes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess that they made all XBoxes appear functionally equivalent by not using all of the space on the 10Gig drive. Consumers could not then claim that they received an inferior unit compared to others.

      If the units perform identically, then it doesn't matter if one HD happens to have some extra unusable space in it. Electronics manufacturers swap internal components all the time (chips, memory, resistors, etc.). Sometimes a better quality part might be used, even if that difference is not evident to the consumer.

    3. Re:Different hard drive sizes by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      It's possible that they are merely partitioning the 10GB drive to 8GB, viola, no difference in size (though I did see the post saying the maximum it reports as free is 50,000+)

  60. could we by cdalemx · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else but I am getting tired of the comments without reason, don't get the wrong Idea I once ran windows 3.1, 95, and even the horrid "me"/"98" and faced the most odd program crashes (well computer crashes) that made acid trips seem boring. . But really I feel that people are misinformed and uneducated when they say windows crashes all the time now days, because it simply does not crash much at all with windows 2k and XP . . it is pretty dam stable. And when people say .. "blab blab bla>> blue screen of death. . bla bla bloated software buggy. . etc . ." I just feel out of touch with that relativity. Microsoft should be criticized for releasing such shity software in the past but now can only be criticized because of their anticompetitive practices. Let me know if you agree with this. If so could people please bash Microsoft without sounding stupid, there are so many evil things that Microsoft can be criticized for, why get stuck up on something that is no longer true.

    1. Re:could we by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I fear for the parent topic if I reply to this, but what the hell, everyone seems to agree it was not that newsworthy (you know you're in trouble when the title of the article begins with "Another") and this will turn into a flamewar anyway ;)

      As someone who has used and maintained Macs and Wintel boxes since Windows 3.1, and *nix boxes since 98, I can genuinely say that there is a lot to the anti-MS argument besides their monopoly power abuses. I do not hold that against them as much as the average /.er either; I have Office v.X and IE for X on my system (although I tend to use other apps instead of them most of the time).

      Now your argument seems to be that MS's problems are gone. First, stability is improving, but it is still playing catch-up with the other OSes. A complaint that is still valid in Win 2000 and beyond, however, is that Windows is much more prone to having problems for seemingly random reasons, as opposed to other OSes where I may still have complicated problems, but at least i will find a reason for them. Anyone else know what I am talking about?

      Secondly, you argue that bloatware is no longer a problem in Redmond. How did you come to this conclusion? I see no trend towards more compact software in their latest products. As MS said, it is very hard to take features out, and as most of us know it is hard to consolidate and reengineer with such large development teams.

      And the monopoly power does have an effect on the product they make; it inspires it to be mediocre and overpriced. Consider Office v.X vs AppleWorks (I know most of you son't have direct experience with both, but it's a good example). Yes, Office does a little more, but I would say 95% of the features are in AppleWorks, and AppleWorks is a beautiful example of how not to overbloat a program and is therefore more efficent for me to do most of my work in. Why is this? MS made some progress in Office 2001, then got complacent because they know they need only do a mediocre job. Same with IE for Mac, back in version 4.0 chief evangelist Guy Kawasaki himself endorsed it for freeing us from the weak Mac version of Netscape, and the development has slowed to a crawl and resulted in a mediocre product that has been surpassed by OmniWeb. Now consider that AppleWorks is $99 and Office is $499 (full version prices for both).

      Anyways, I think the quote in my signiture sums it up best; who would know better than the man who figured out how a computer should be designed to work with people in the first place. Consider how many good products have buckled under the competitive pressure of mediocre MS software, and hopefully now you understand why so many people want to buy an XBox and turn it into a cheap Linux system just to make MS lose money:)

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    2. Re:could we by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agree. 40% of the /. crowd are mindless linuix droids living an the ideal 16 year olds world of everything should be free.

    3. Re:could we by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes we are, and you know something? It's pretty damn nice in this here ideal world.

      Btw - why can't I just hate MS indiscriminantly and be taken at my word? Why do people think that I need to somehow justify to them my relationship (or lack thereof) with a company?

      I hate their guts. I don't use their software - case closed.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:could we by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...simply does not crash much at all..."

      If it crashes at all, its unstable/buggy. An operating system should _never_ crash. Hell, I've seen Netware and BSD servers that've run for years without any problems. Until MS can accomplish something like that, I will continue to regard their OS as an unstable POS.

  61. In other news: Coming from your kitchen sink... by pjbass · · Score: 1

    OpenBSD has now been ported from your kitchen sink to the XBox. Yet in much astonishment to the BSD team, the kitchen sink *still* crunches more RC5-64 keys per minute than the XBox.

  62. Not merely for the thrill of it by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2
    For the anti-M$ crowd, the concept of rogue Linux Xboxes is its own reward, but there are real world reasons for others to take an interest in this "research"...
    1. The Xbox is still cheaper than even the cheapest PC. This makes a difference at the low end of the market.
    2. Unless you buy a bunch of parts, it's not all that easy to buy a PC without M$ getting paid for a pre-loaded OS.
    Let's think about the state of the world, 6 months from now. The Xbox is completely hacked, and loading Linux takes about an hour per box. If I'm running a business that needs low-cost desktops (or even low-cost servers), I might be tempted to deploy Linux Xboxes.

    I'm not saying this is the universal answer for everyone, but we are looking at the latest attempt at subsidized hardware in pursuit of a captive software market. I see nothing wrong with taking advantage of subsidized hardware if I can escape from software captivity. If M$ doesn't like it, then they can price the console at a level that reflects its cost.

    IMHO: Of all the companies that might attempt to market unhackable devices, M$ would be dead last in their ability to pull it off. The only time-tested method of making unhackable devices requires the use of non-standard (expensive) components. This drives up the per unit cost, which is unacceptable in a subsidized hardware environment.

    1. Re:Not merely for the thrill of it by frizz · · Score: 1

      The X-Box is not really that cheap compared to a comparably fast (if not faster) pc.

      Prices taken from newegg:
      Enlight case w/300watt power supply: $47
      750MHz duron: $38
      CPU Fan: $6
      ECS K7SEM Mobo: $59
      20GB Seagate hard drive: $71
      128MB DDR Ram: $20
      Ethernet Card: $10
      ATI Video card: $22
      DVD-ROM: $50

      Total: $323

      I'd take the above configuration any day over an X-Box.

    2. Re:Not merely for the thrill of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how does that 22$ video card stack up to the xbox nvidia graphics.. hehe.

      great, you'd take a new pc over an xbox. thats nice, but you dont seem to care about playing games on that pc... sheesh...

      i hope you wasted a lot of time looking up the prices for this crappy argument.

    3. Re:Not merely for the thrill of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, i'd take Mandrake Gaming Edition over your selection.

    4. Re:Not merely for the thrill of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22$ video card does not equal GeForce 3 performance.

      The defense rests.

    5. Re:Not merely for the thrill of it by frizz · · Score: 1

      The original message did not state anything about using the PC to play games (in fact, I get the impression that the topic is obtaining a box that runs linux, not games). Since the topic of this message is hacking the X-box to be PC (not a gaming machine), I stand by my original argument. Also, I'm sure by this time next year a geforce 3 will be about $22 also (well, maybe two years). In any case, if the X-box is going to last for any respectable amount of time, its fancy pants, non-upgradeable geforce3 won't be worth a dime eventually.

    6. Re:Not merely for the thrill of it by titaniafq · · Score: 1

      Over here in the good old UK (well maybe not good, just old) you are not going to get a good video card for 15 pounds. About 100 UKP is the *minimum* that you'd have to pay to get good performance. And some GF3Ti cards cost 400 UKP over here - I'd rather spend that money on something a bit more worthwhile!

      Also, that things gonna be a big butt ugly case and look nothing like a console (OK maybe not what you want it for, but I wouldnt want a big beige case in my living room. They belong in the computer room - and the PS2 belongs under my TV)

      Don't get me wrong, I ain't a fan of the XBox, mostly because its just ugly and I have a PS2 and will be getting a GC - do I need any more consoles.

      Oh, well.
      If it ain't raining...

      --
      -- Do not bite the bait of pleasure till you know there is no hook beneath it.
  63. This is as good a spot as any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the morons posting about how MS will lose money if you buy an X-Box because they're planning on selling them at a loss of $100 per need to get a clue.

    Do you really think that every time you buy an X-Box, MS loses $100 (or whatever the figure is)? No, and you are a moron if you think so.

    The bulk of the cost to MS on each X-Box has already been spent: R&D, initial marketing, hardware acquisition, manufacuturing process wtup, etc etc. They are what is called "sunk cost" - that refers to the fact that the money is already gone and is not affected by however many future units are made and/or sold. Incremental costs are the ones incurred every time one more X-Box is made - and they sure as shit aren't in the $400 (again, whatever the exact figure is - I'm just guessing, but the principles are the same)range.

    Sure, if you do this:

    [sunk costs + (incremental costs * number of units expected to be manufactured)]/number of units expected to be sold

    you will probably get $400 which leads your dumbass to believe that buy spending "only" $300, you're costing MS $100. But that's an accounting trick. What you're really doing is paying for the manufacture of the box and helping MS to recoup the sunk costs - which were already written off.

    In conclusion, anyone who says that they're hurting MS by buying an X-Box should tell me what company they work for and whether or not they make financial decisions for said company to help me avoid unwise stock purchases.

    1. Re:This is as good a spot as any by kawaichan · · Score: 1

      Plus the fact that you can't do anything without the games, and they make money off the games. and controllers, memory cards too. And that's why the quality of games are so important.

      --

      kawai
    2. Re:This is as good a spot as any by xbrownx · · Score: 1

      Very very true.

      Microsoft has already spent the $400 on the manufacture of the X-Box (if said figures are true/accurate).

      You would be hurting Microsoft even more if you never bought a system in the first place.

  64. please by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    it's not like you were bitching about people with good old file://con/con trick to crash win9x.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  65. Unlikely, becauseTaco is is impotent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it hard to reconcile your
    taco-snotting experience with
    my experience. First, you need
    to know that I went on an
    intimate date with cmdrTaco
    last night in rock creek park.
    Let me share a few observations:

    -- The good news is that cmdr Taco
    is indeed a caring and thoughtful
    lover. He graciously sucked his
    own shit clumps off my cock each
    time after I throttled his hairy
    arse.

    -- Unfortunately, he whined like an
    annoying bitch. Something about
    getting leaves and mud all stuck
    up in his hair.

    -- His tiny cock was too limp to be
    of any use, in fact he's completely
    impotent.

    -- He won't stop calling me, he's left
    15 messages on my machine today!
    He's droning on about not wanting
    to grow old all alone(very unattractive).

    He is so unaggressive, and docile, as well
    as impotent, that I dont thing that your
    taco-snotting story adds up.

    So what gives? Are we talking about the
    same commander, maybe there are two?
    Was he just in a really laid back,
    non-taco-snotting mood last night?
    Perhaps the taco I had was an imposter!

    P.S. I really hope you can address
    these points in revision $1.9x$

    Thanks!
    --NASA Troll

  66. WD or Seagate? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    Hard OCP's disection of the unit has a seagate hdd - but the other site's xbox had a wd hdd. Does anyone know why?

    1. Re:WD or Seagate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WD is the 8 gb one, seagate put a 10 gb disk in it

  67. Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by bani · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft will most certainly bust out the DMCA on you and have you arrested.

    You have been warned.

    M$ shareholders would most certainly demand prosecution under the DMCA. M$ will be forced to act.

    1. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless, of course, it's developed outside the united states.

    2. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by talonyx · · Score: 2

      To prosecute exactly WHAT?

      You own the fucking box. Hack it and you void your warranty. It's not licensed like software, you own the physical unit.

      Feel free to reverse engineer and hack to your heart's content. You don't break any copyrights by doing so.

      Hacking MS's proprietary encrypted FS is a different issue.

    3. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i'm getting pretty sick of the fud over this. most of the world doesn't give a sh*t about US laws.

    4. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by bani · · Score: 2

      Here's how it would be argued:

      1) The xbox employs copyright control mechanisms which only allow specially protected/authorized/licensed software to run on it. This could be the BIOS, the encrypted FS, you name it. Almost anything can be an excuse.
      2) Hacking the xbox to allow "unprotected/unauthorized/unlicensed software" (eg Linux) to run on it implicitly requires circumvention of these "copyright control" mechanisms. This is prohibited by the DMCA.

      I also bet that the shrinkwrap license for xbox is written as a "rental" or similar, and that you really don't own the box or the software.

    5. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as you *NEVER RELEASE THE HACK*, it's fine. if you release it, you're fucked.

    6. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      Hacking the xbox to allow "unprotected/unauthorized/unlicensed software" (eg Linux) to run on it implicitly requires circumvention of these "copyright control" mechanisms. This is prohibited by the DMCA.

      If and only if that Linux port somehow allowed users to gain access to copyrighted data (e.g. XBox games). If the CD/DVD driver just allowed normal access to normal media w/out automatically decrypting XBox games, then MS' lawyers would be hard-pressed to find a section of DMCA that applies.

      I'm not saying they wouldn't try it, and that they wouldn't be able to harrass and intimidate someone. But once it got to a judgement, Microsoft would face a serious risk of losing.

      I suspect that the safest thing for Microsoft to do, would be to buy a new law that protects give-away-the-razor-and-sell-blades business models.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Warning to those thinking of porting Linux... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      You mean like DeCSS was?

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  68. Turn a XBox into a XBox? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Aeh.

    1. Re:Turn a XBox into a XBox? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      No, it's XBox into a LBox...

  69. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by jokell82 · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this argument is that no matter how many XBox's MS sells, it will NEVER make any money unless it sells games. If everyone had an xbox just to use it as an X11 server, MS would have to leave the console business. MS's problem isn't selling the consoles; they need the games. The console that has the best games will win this "war." The consoles don't sell the games, the games sell the consoles. How many people bought PS2 because of GT3? Or bought it because MGS2 was coming out for it? How many excellent games does the xbox have for it right now? I know it's just the launch titles...but MS has a lot of catching up to do.

    --
    I dunno who it is
    but it prolly is fhqwhgads.
  70. It never fails! by F34RL3SS+L34D3R · · Score: 1

    I can't www.icrontic.com for the life of me.

    And once again the /. effect continues.

  71. Thanks for living up to your name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dolt.

  72. Halo. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    Hands down the killer title.

    And they will come out with more. By that time, if people do buy a Xbox for other reasons, then you can be sure that they will pickup one title. There wouldn't be a reason not to.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Halo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definately. 12 hours nonstop marathon a day after getting it. Intense stuff.

  73. just a PC? by zephc · · Score: 2

    733 MHz Celeron? ATA33 cable (and drive I assume)? 10 GB drive? as a friend said, its an eMachines computer in a black box, sold by MS. :-P

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  74. cookies by mobets · · Score: 0

    Did any one else notice how many cookies for ads this site tried to set? I counted about 5, and each from a different place. That is just offensive.

    --

    It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    1. Re:cookies by Inside_Joke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Cookies? Where? Chocolate chip? Ooh, I hope so. You know how long it's been since I had a good chocolate chip cookie?

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that you're an idiot!
  75. wrong!!! by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    The XBox uses a X86 chip (Cu'mine Celeron, ie a P3 core) & a NVidia unified memory multimedia/graphics I/O chipset.

    Right now Taiwan's motherboard makers are in the process of bringing out Athlon boards based on the EV6 bus version of NVidia's unified memory 'NForce' multimedia/graphics chipset.

    That means that there will be X86 Linux chipset drivers for NVidia's unified memory multimedia/graphics chipset. & the next kernal revision will most probably have them pre-integrated.

    This means one should, with little work (once the HDD is re-partitioned/formated, so it no longer has MS's propietry XBos filesystem on it), be able to load a standard X86 distibution on it - such as the Madrake 8/1 gaming installation.

    Then any X86 Linux games should hopefully work.

    1. Re:wrong!!! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Then any X86 Linux games should hopefully work.

      Kewl! A cheap Mame box. (http://www.mame.net)

      I might even purchase one if someone can get that going.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:wrong!!! by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I can count the number of native Linux games that I would rather play on an X-Box than on my PC on one hand, or maybe that's one finger. =)

      Again, my point is not that it is not feasible to play games on the X-Box or port software to it. Heck, we have people porting stuff to PS2 Linux and its doing well considering the differences between x86 hardware and PS2. However, I'm talking about, who would develop a game commercially for X-Box and release it so that it works "best on X-Box" without getting a license? I'm not talking about freeware or pre-existing software that is ported, but those that would develop a game like the original poster said and release it commercially without MS's license. No one is going to mess around with MS and release an unlicensed game that sells for money. That would be a disaster for MS, and MS will fight back.

    3. Re:wrong!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would develop a game commercially for X-Box and release it so that it works "best on X-Box" without getting a license?

      On one hand you've got the DMCA.

      On the other you've got a publisher culture that's accustomed to the Japanese (weak anti-trust) way of sucking up and paying the licence fee.

      And on the third hand you've got a non-redistributable Nvidia driver.

      For those reason you are right. But it wasn't always that way. Activision took Atari to court and won the right to sell games without a licence using good old fashioned reverse engineering.

    4. Re:wrong!!! by m2 · · Score: 2
      That means that there will be X86 Linux chipset drivers for NVidia's unified memory multimedia/graphics chipset

      Truly interesting. What makes you say that? I'd love to see Linux and OpenGL running on the Xbox, it sounds like a great machine to run demos on, and I even think getting Linux on it is feasible. But the NVIDIA drivers? I doubt that, at least I won't hold by breath until it happens, I've kind of got used to life. NVIDIA doesn't seem to like the idea of documenting their hardware in an open way (old dogs don't learn new tricks, and that sounds specially valid in the case of ex-SGI engineers), and there's way too many people playing along (buying their stuff because there "are" Linux drivers), so the company doesn't even see the need to change its ways. Even if you assume you can use the already released stuff to drive the GPU, what about the nForce? NVIDIA has its own AGP drivers, they haven't released source for them, and they don't seem to plan on doing it. NVIDIA will probably gets a sizeable ammount of money out of Xbox sales, and they'll will do anything to increase sales by any ridiculous percent (even if that means providing Linux drivers for it), but daddy Microsoft won't like the idea, will he? That's a big but.

  76. I am sick of people saying XBox is a PC by kawaichan · · Score: 1

    What about your PS2??? Sony calls it a "Computer Enteriament system", so you can call PS2 a PC too then right? The fact is XBox is a stripped down verison of PC and so is gamecube and PS2 the biggest difference is that XBox is x86, Gamecube is PPC and god konws what PS2 is running off. And that leaves me to this conclusion, is it also safe to say that Gamecube would make a really cheap ass mac too if someone can stick a HD in? People are bitching at the fact that XBox has a HD built in, what's so bad about a HD, for once you don't actually have to buy those expensive ass memory cards so that you can safe you games. I am not saying Xbox is going to rock, but don't bitch at things that is simply not true.

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:I am sick of people saying XBox is a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE DRUNK.

      (yes, lame /. filter, I AM SHOUTING)

    2. Re:I am sick of people saying XBox is a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS2 uses a Mips processor. And a Linux version (plus a harddrive) is already out...

      The problem with a harddrive is that it's prone to failure. So are the (many =) fans. I'm expecting it to fail far more than the PS2 and the GameCube simply because there are too many complex components.

      I'm not saying the GameCube won't ever crash (In fact, it already has) but because of the beautiful, simple design, it probably won't happen as often.

      The GameCube has clearly been designed from the ground up to be a game system, _not_ a computer.
      I won't speak for the PS2 since I'm not really a fan, and don't know too much about it.

      AC - Anonymous 'till some of my posts get modded up.

    3. Re:I am sick of people saying XBox is a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you can't go out and just buy the parts used in the Gamecube or PlayStation 2. For Xbox parts its just a trip down to the computer show or CompUSA.

  77. Other way arround. I think by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    8GB WD, 10GB S'gate

  78. Re:On Taco-Snotting 1.9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was funny the first 100 times. Now it is getting boring!

  79. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by newbiescum · · Score: 1

    Actually consoles sell at a loss in the beginning, and then they make money up in the end if the price cuts weren't too big. Imagine this, if MS keeps the X-Box for 4-5 years (considering that's the normal pace of the industry to release the next generation), how much will that GeForce 3/motherboard/hard drive/CPU be worth? I'm thinking a heck of a lot less than $299.

    And as for MS never making money, the thing is that they will. Probably not on the X-Box, but like I said, they're thinking long term here as well as what Sony thought in the beginning. This is a great growth area, and literally, it is the last few places that PCs themselves grow too for the average user (multimedia/games are one of the few reasons left for your average person to buy a new computer or new parts anymore). MS can't control the licensing on PCs, so why not just make consoles and control it there?

    And consoles are going to be much more than just gaming machines in the future. I think people like the idea of specialized devices that still do lots of things very well (DVD player + console is a great idea IMO and the number of people who bought the PS2 for its DVD functionality without buying games shows). Those PCs in your living room deal are starting to take form in consoles and Tivo units.

    Also, I want to point out again, that I think MS has a lot of work cut out for them if they wish to dominant, but thinking that "Oh, I'm going to hurt MS by buying a console that MS is losing money on", isn't exactly hurting them either even if they are losing money. Remember, they can take a hit and keep on running (with billions in the bank and in stocks). It's not like Nintendo where this is their core business.

    One last thing, I do think that MS entering the arena has got Sony and Nintendo thinking more aggressively and are starting to beef up their offerings in the future which is good. Whether or not splitting the consoles into 3 very fractured markets with quicker hardware releases (you have to assume that Sony is thinking about releasing the PS3 earlier due to the latest reports, plus that could cause MS/Nintendo to also release earlier), I don't think is such a good idea for gamers.

  80. Why hacking the XBox might not be worthwhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So I've been thinking about all this interest in hacking the XBox, and I've decided to take part in the fray. Bold statement: Hacking the XBox to do other stuff would be cool, mainly because it would earn one bragging rights, but it would be useless.

    The technology in the XBox is more expensive than a comparable PC. A $300 PC has much higher resolution video, more/expandable memory, standard expansion slots, a faster/larger HD, compatability with productivity software, and some even have TV output. The one thing that it doesn't necessarily have is the DVD-ROM.

    THAT'S IT.

    In the time it takes you to hack this device, the hardware gap will only increase. The only advantage to owning an XBox over a PC is in its entertainment value. Porting Linux to the XBox is an absolute joke. Since when has Linux been a platform for playing video games? Porting Windows would be far more interesting, but in all seriousness, Microsoft did that for you with DirectX (hence the X in the name XBox).

    Microsoft designed the XBox knowing that you're going to try, so if picking all the Microsoft protections satisfies your personal vendetta, go for it. You won't be able to market anything you come up with without a team of lawyers larger than Microsoft's, and if you're looking for render-farms, I hear that people waste CPU cycles all day long on the internet. If you convince a whole bunch of people to donate their unused CPU cycles, you benefit far faster than you do spending $300 a pop for a Box that's likely to be sold out at your local toy store for months.

    Don't listen to me. I just work here.
    -Mike

    1. Re:Why hacking the XBox might not be worthwhile. by bunnie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The flip side is that if you can figure out enough about the XBOX internals, you could potentially write an XBOX emulator, and all those great XBOX titles can run on your home PC :-)

      If they are using a relatively standard PC-style API, it might not be infeasible...the trick is probably figuring out what tweaks are in that nvidia gfx and sound chip.

    2. Re:Why hacking the XBox might not be worthwhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      bunnie wrote:

      The flip side is that if you can figure out enough about the XBOX internals, you could potentially write an XBOX emulator, and all those great XBOX titles can run on your home PC :-)

      If they are using a relatively standard PC-style API, it might not be infeasible...the trick is probably figuring out what tweaks are in that nvidia gfx and sound chip.

      And my response:

      There is a lot more required to port an XBox game to the PC.

      But at the same time, the companies that wrote the software to begin with can release their software on Windows with minimal changes. The difference between their games on the PC and their games on the XBox is the amount of testing that needs to go on to ensure that their games work on different kinds of hardware that are found on the PC, vs one kind of hardware on the XBox.

      Also, it's a lot harder to pick the code for the game out from the XBox OS, as Microsoft statically binds, optimizes, and encrypts the code together. Imagine what kind of performance gains there are in the fact that the OS and the game are all that's run on the computer. There's one main memory, and DirectX is compiled against and statically linked in with the code.

      Not only would it be incredably difficult to separate out the DirectX/XBox OS bits from the code, but you'd have to do it on a per game basis, as Microsoft isn't garunteed to bind the same amount of XBox OS into each game! Why? Well, if your game never uses the Ethernet, you don't need code to use it. Also, XBox OS versions might change. The discs have the XBox OS built-in, so the version it was built against determines what revision of the code the game uses.

      People who wrote the games for the XBox in the first place can port their games to the PC far faster than someone could reverse engineer a single game. This is an advantage for the XBox and Microsoft Windows/DirectX API.

      Don't take my word on all of the above, but I have sources inside Microsoft that have talked with me about the XBox architecture, and I don't think anyone's going to have a fun time emulating the XBox, encryption or not, it's all a huge proprietary system with no tools for hacking. Microsoft holds all the tools, and I bet that they gaurd those tools better than people gaurd their most prized possesion.

      -Mike (same AC as above)

  81. arent you all m issing the point?? by doktorjayd · · Score: 1

    isnt the x-box just a vehicle on which some flavour of DirextX can be implemented in hardware???

    sheesh.

    al you gamers out there... yes, all you /. gamers.. youre more'n likely ruuning windows something and more 'n likely crunching dirextX through your cpu/gpu.....

    this xbox has that covered, and i'm sure the api for developers will call up directx on its own chip...

    so the concept of porting it for linux/linux for it is really a matter of porting directX for linux/linux for directx

    any takers??

    1. Re:arent you all m issing the point?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      random thought but,

      is anyone hoping that the xbox takes off and that pc games are widely available on xbox? think about it, that windows pc you maintain and upgrade all the time to play the newest games wouldnt be necessary anymore.

  82. Different Hard Drive **SIZE** by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

    Not only are the hard drives different brands, they are different sizes. The WD drive is 8GB while the SeaGate one is 10GB. Wonder what other differences we can expect to find...

  83. Nvidea UM PC chipsets already exist. by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    They've already release a EV6 bus (Athlon) version of their NForce unified memory graphics/multimedia i/o chipsets.

    This means that X86 Linux NForce chipset drivers are probably already out.

    Here's a preview of the referance board

    Here's a pic of the board

    PC unified memory chipsets in the past (SIS, VIA/Trident Blade, VIA/Savage, Intel 810/815), never really had the memory bandwidth for fast gaming graphics, but with a combination of twin bank & DDR its no longer a problem.

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
    MS is taking about $100's loss per unit.


    MS takes a bigger loss when you don't buy a unit, though.

  86. Re:UMA is a performance issue by X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tradtionally, UMA is a huge performance issue because all the components are accessing memory over the same, narrow bus. However, Xbox uses AMD's HyperTransport bus, which effectively provides a dedicated channel for each device on the bus (in the Xbox's case I believe just the CPU and GPU are on the bus).

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
  87. VGA adapter please! by darekana · · Score: 1

    What I would like to see most is a VGA adapter...

  88. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how much will that GeForce 3/motherboard/hard drive/CPU be worth? I'm thinking a heck of a lot less than $299

    Of course -- but then why would you buy an XBox two years down the road?

    Only reasons I can think of is that:
    1) MS uses their game licencing agreements to ensure XBox 'exclusive' titles, forcing publishers to choose between XBox and Windows.

    2) MS uses their Windows contracts to ensure that OEMs don't enter the settop box market.

    Either way it's got shit written all over it.

  89. YOU ARE WINNER by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

    Crackhead moderators: this is +5, Hilarious material.

    --

    --
    CNN declares War on Islam!
    Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  90. Re:(n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree whole-fartedly!

  91. Re:Cheap Sluts? by smackmonkey · · Score: 1

    Face it, moderator.
    You only hate him because he's right.

    --

    --
    CNN declares War on Islam!
    Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  92. A funny cartoon on X-Box by antdude · · Score: 1
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  93. Re:On Taco-Snotting 1.9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice how GWB never masturbates here on Saturdays? His parents must stay home that nite.

  94. Re:damn 20 sec crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what? is that how long it takes for you to cum from sticking you pathetically small penis in your pre-teen sister's ass?

  95. XBox - LinuXBox ? by mailuefterl · · Score: 1

    I just wonder how long it will take until the first Linux Haxk of an XBox will be around?
    Any bets? 2 weeks, 3 weeks?

    1. Re:XBox - LinuXBox ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has already been asked by 3 newbies already. Please fuck off until you learn to read the material already here. Someone mod this toss-piece down.

  96. GW, please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GW...you know we love every hair on your 27 acre ass... and I, for one, would never do anything untowards your graceful demeanor. And you probably have several friends that would love to help you do the bear dance all over my face if I so much as spelled your name wrong. And you know I'd defend your Constitutional right to defame God in heaven. I'd even help fund your education, should you ever decide to take that route. Hell, I'd buy you a tall tepid bear-whiz beer if you were here with me, right now!

    But. ...if you can't find another topic, I'm gonna step over your dead mother's grave and kick your assuredly anesthetitized butt clear across the playground.

    Now go stick your shaved head back down inside the woman's toilet, and just to show there's no hard feelings, I'll jump in the tow-truck and drive right over to help you pull it right out...ok?

    thanks

  97. Is it just me... by nyet · · Score: 2

    .. or has the quality of newbies gone down?

    1. Re:Is it just me... by bytes256 · · Score: 1
      .. or has the quality of newbies gone down?

      No just the quality of the moderators

      --

      Slashdot, the site where everything's made up and the points don't matter
  98. Looks like a lot of fun by Lewisham · · Score: 1

    I reckon that cracking open a console, and being able to hack it's arse off looks like a lot of fun indeed. It may well be a PC, but it's cheap (compared to building your own), and does the job of running games better than my home brew beast, which is only a year old. The thought of squeezing out extra FPS on Halo makes me go all shivery.

  99. XBox API Support. by GLevangelist · · Score: 1

    Does the XBox have OpenGL support? I would assume by default that it doesn't, but a while ago I heard a rumour that Nvidia may provide support.

    Can any XBox developers (or anyone in the know) please fill me in?

    1. Re:XBox API Support. by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine any reason why MS would allow OpenGL to run on a box thats essentially a hardware implementation of DirectX.

  100. Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft though. by DeepFyre · · Score: 0

    Some people have said about not supporting Microsoft, but buying the XBox wouldn't support them, as they make a loss on it. As long as you didn't buy any software for it, you would actually be contributing to Microsofts downfall. :)

  101. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And indeed, EVERYBODY - every man, woman and child - on this planet WANTS and NEEDS and X11 server. And indeed, EVERYBODY WILL buy XBOX for it. And ofcourse NONE of those "everyone" will want ANY games for their new XBOX.

    Following this logic the PS2 Linux would be a deathblow to Sony because no-one would buy the console for games.

  102. Way to get (Linux/Other operating systems) on Xbox by MrDoh! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Firstly, don't think your going to be able to put RedHat bootdisks in and fire it up.
    MS will have pretty good security here to stop this working (I know, Dreamcast's protection got hacked eventually, but we need a simpler way of doing this).
    What I suggest is the Trojan way in. We need to get a boot disc that has the capability of loading something like VMware/Bochs, and is certified by MS (The tricky bit). Once that is done, we're in. We use that as a bootloader, swap discs, and carry on as usual.
    Not the perfect solution, but it's a start to get a development system onto the machine.
    And it would show Linux running on a XBox onto a TV, this fact alone would be an achievement, no?
    So, who's up for a bit of social engineering into talking someone at MS to let us use a CDR with emulating boot code?
    As an aside, does anyone know if the XBox is region locked? I'm visiting the US tomorrow and would like to know if it's worth me bring a machine back to the UK. Ta!

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
  103. Wrong by humantraffic · · Score: 1

    Microsoft loses money on the X Box hardware and hopes to recoup it on consumers buying licensed software. If you're only going to use it as an X terminal and not buy any games then you *are* hurting Microsoft....

    1. Re:Wrong by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are costing them $100 that they can afford to lose, but you're also helping their sales figures. If 1200 geeks bought X-Boxen and turned them into X terminals, that's $120,000 they already budgeted to lose, and can afford to lose, and it's 1200 more sales than they would have made.

      Also, one could point out that if no one buys the X-Box, they lose even more money than just $100 each, but since people are likely to buy them anyway, it doesn't really matter.

      --Dan

  104. You can play on your Indrema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that what it was called?

  105. not really a cheap PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pricewatch.com reports 700mhz duron systems for $238, and 850 mhz athlon systems for $258. At $299, the X-Box, requiring as-yet-to-be-determined hacks, doesn't seem like that much of a bargain for a "cheap" pc.

    1. Re:not really a cheap PC by irishmikev · · Score: 1

      Find me a PC for 300 bucks with a GeForce4 in it, and you've got a point there.

  106. Well that could add to the value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rented one right on the day it came out (wasn't planning on it, but they happened to have one in). Anyways here's what I found.

    X-Box IS huge hehe. This is really not that relevant for a game system I suppose.

    The controllers are just plain awful! I think the worst part are the buttons- they are like little stones or something- you start hammering on those and you'll be crippled by the time you finish DOA3.

    Load times are good, internal HDD is nice. Perhaps the most damning thing here is the lack of good software. DOA3 was pretty slick, but really it was DOA2 (extra points for having a drunken boxer!)- heh playing this game the controller's weaknesses were highlighted. Button position not so bad...it's the damn hardness of the buttons! (oh and only two shoulder buttons...)

    Halo, now Halo was a huge disappointment for me. It just wasn't that good! Seriously I was bored by it! Had some nice graphics I guess (though not as good as they were made out to be), but there wasn't anything there that impressed me too much. This is their flagship title?

    Anyways X-Box has some potential buried down in there somewhere...maybe in a year it'll have some decent software, though I think i'll have to buy aftermarket controllers!! Gamecube will have it's market almost for sure. I think PS2 is still the horse to bet on for this year...there's so many titles out (good ones) that I can't keep up at the moment. (GTA3, Ace Combat 4, Half Life, 007 Agent Under Fire, SSX Tricky, GT3, the list goes on)

  107. Not enough memory by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    64Mb is a bit on the slim side for rendering nowadays. I work in the digital effects industry, and our render farm boxes all have at least a gig of RAM. Really, I think you'd be better off buying rack systems - they won't end up that more expensive, they'll do the job properly, and you won't have to mod them yourself. And of course, they'll actually have a warranty after you've set them up... ;)

  108. not suitable for console by staeci · · Score: 1

    It has to be able to withstand being pulled off the TV by a drunken/stoned 20-something tripping over the controller cords. How long do you think the harddrive will last?

    --
    'Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson...'
    1. Re:not suitable for console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting thought, but the cables snap apart long before they would budge the weight of the main unit. So unless you are actually hugging the unit, you are not going to drag it down with you.

  109. linux anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me know when ya get linux to run on it

    1. Re:linux anyone?? by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      "XBox SUCKS because it's just a PC"

      "Let's run LINUX on it"

      Uh, could you all make up your minds? That's what I love about SlashDot, the hypocracy!!

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    2. Re:linux anyone?? by Derleth · · Score: 1

      "XBox SUCKS because it's just a PC"

      "Let's run LINUX on it"

      Uh, could you all make up your minds? That's what I love about SlashDot, the hypocracy!!

      I'm sorry we're not all mindless drones. It might make it easier for your eight-bit brain to process slashdot if it was a hivemind collective, but the borg add-ons would ruin my boyish good looks. :-)

      Oh, and learn to spell hypocrisy.

      --
      How can you use my intestines as a gift? -Actual Hong Kong subtitle.
  110. backwards hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hack I want is to be able to turn my PC into an xbox on the fly. Anybody working on reverse engineering the filesystem and drive?

  111. Error in article. That's not a DVD decoder. by TBBle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's the TV-Out chip.
    http://www.conexant.com/default.sph/SaServletEng in e.class/Web/products/products.jsp?Type=Prod&ProdFa mId=10&ProdCatId=0&ProdSubCatId=94&PartId=278&clrT rail=yes
    If it was doing the DVD playback it'd be marked 'Video Decoder'
    and I don't think Conexant actually makes an MPEG-2 decoder chip.
    HardOCP made the same mistake... Hmm...

    --
    Paul "TBBle" Hampson
    Paul.Hampson@Pobox.Com
    1. Re:Error in article. That's not a DVD decoder. by CoolVibe · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well duh...

      There actually is no reason why DVD decoding should be done in hardware. The specs of the x-box make it suitable enough to do DVD decoding in software easily. Maybe the video decoding hardware is for TV output or input. Maybe one could convert the X-box into some tivo-like appliance?

      If digital video playback is done in software (I'm talking MPEG here folks), it might be possible to get this thing to decode DiVX ;-) or other digital video formats as well.

      Or am I too far off base here?

    2. Re:Error in article. That's not a DVD decoder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is likely that the onboard Nvidia chipset performs all the DVD decoding functions.
      Most graphic chip suppliers include on-chip DVD support to reduce costs.

  112. Is hacking the X-Box worth it? by prototype · · Score: 1

    Really now. Think about it. Is it really worth the time and effort in hacking the X-Box?

    We know that MS has put in all kinds of encryption/protection schemes. The hardware isn't exactly your typical PC (no USB, etc.). Ethernet won't be availble for another year. Linear memory. All of these add up to one nut that's going to be tough to crack. I'm not saying it's going to be impossible, I'm sure it'll be done at some point but is it worth it?

    After all this trouble in hacking through some MS hardware, they'll issue a firmware update and *poof*, all those efforts down the tubes. We return to the assembly debugger bench and begin anew. Months later another hack comes out and we rejoice and launch MAME, Linux and whatever else we want on our game consoles only to have another update that blows away our efforts.

    And for what? To have MAME or Linux run on a game console? My suggestion would be to take all that time and skill you're thinking about investing into hacking the X-Box and make Linux that much better. Write those much needed office suites, 3D apps and sound editors that we need instead of playing around with a silly game console. Let MS keep plodding away and let them battle it out with Sony and Nintentdo. Fight the battles worth fighting.

    liB

    1. Re:Is hacking the X-Box worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a truly inspired comment. Probably the most insightful that has yet been posted on this subject. Mod parent up.

    2. Re:Is hacking the X-Box worth it? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      You're kidding right? Linux has been ported to every freakin piece of hardware that has come down the pike. I've asked myself that same question at least 10 times in the past two years when I hear that someone has taken a perfectly working machine and hacked Linux on it just to stare at a command line. Why start questioning it now? Especially since, of all the latest ports, this one comes closest to being actually useful!

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    3. Re:Is hacking the X-Box worth it? by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Linux has been ported to every freakin piece of hardware that has come down the pike

      But it hasn't been ported to every box without the cooperation of the manufacturer. Notice that no one is doing their own port to the PS2, but they're on their knees waiting for Sony to get around to it.

      The i-opener was pretty easy because the manufacturer didn't take measures to keep unauthorized software off it. The only "difficult" port I can think of was NetBSD (not Linux!) to the Dreamcast.

  113. database error... by deander2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Database error: connect(localhost,mortin,PASSWORD) failed.

    real secure there buddy...
    my password is PASSWORD.

    off-topic/flamebait my ass. fuck you mod bitches. IT'S FUNNY.

    1. Re:database error... by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

      At least the password isn't something really obscure, like 'myvoice'.

  114. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  115. load times by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    How are the load times for the Xbox?
    I have a PS2 and the load times suck a$$.
    Curious as to how they compare...

    Magius_AR

    1. Re:load times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have both, xbox is lots faster. Especially considering the complexity of halo, never has any pauses, and 3-4 hours of play on a single 15 second load, where as spy hunter is 5 minutes of play and a 30 second load.

      Brian

  116. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    If we don't buy any, they lose even more money. Instead of losing ~$125, they lose ~$424.

  117. Re:Way to get (Linux/Other operating systems) on X by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's worth bringing back, since its output will be NTSC and you'll need a multiformat TV or some other piece of hardware that converts the NTSC signal to PAL.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
  118. CDR support by gabebear · · Score: 1

    According to This Site the xbox doesn't support CD-R disks but does support CD-RW. I would really like to see one of these take-apart articles see if the DVD drive is standard and see where MS tried to put in this no CDR policy

    1. Re:CDR support by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      It would be fairly easy to do this in software. The cdrecord program can determine the type, laser power required, size, manufacturer, and serial number of a blank cdr/cdrw. This information is stored at the beginning of a blank CD -- it's also how burners tell the difference between the "computer data" cdr and the "RIAA tax paid music" cdr. Of course, it would be pretty easiy for ms to do this check in its software - using standard hardware keeps prices down.

      (of course, the drive could still be non-standard!)

      I think the cdrecord option is -atip:

      -atip Retrieve and print out the ATIP (absolute Time in Pregroove) info of a CD recordable or CD rewritable media. With this option, cdrecord will try to retrieve the ATIP info. If the actual drive does not support to read the ATIP info, it may be that only a reduced set of information records or even nothing is displayed. Only a limited number of MMC compliant drives support to read the ATIP info.

    2. Re:CDR support by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      The simplest explanation for why the Xbox doesn't support CD-R is that it only has a red laser. CD's use infrared lasers. Stamped CDs and some CD-RWs and very few CD-Rs can be read by DVD drives.

      Some DVD transports (I guess all DVD-ROM PC drives) have dual pickups with both lasers (and phototransistors sensitive to each wavelength). They're more expensive, though.

      DVD-Rs should work if you're trying to backup or steal games. You'd probably need to make a bit-for-bit copy (if the DVD-R's firmware lets you) so your keys are preserved. It's possible that the more complicated scenario of reading the run-in groove would prevent that, though. On the gripping hand, I'd expect that DVD-R-Video of home movies would work.

  119. No way, it's not feasible by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure the XBox is for sale at "regular" retail stores. There is no way that retail stores are going to go to the trouble of getting signed contracts from each person who buys an XBox. It would just be too much of a hassle, and they would have to refuse to sell the product to the most obvious market: minors. Therefore, regardless of whatever claims Microsoft (or pieces of paper inside the box) may make, there can't reasonably be any EULA for this product.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:No way, it's not feasible by fiftyfly · · Score: 1

      Ummm, just like every no retail store could possibly make you sign a contract for, say, that nice shiny copy of XP? That's the whole problem with M$ (and many other's) EULA's - they liscence _everything_ and, by the agreement, have to agree to it just to open the box so you can read the agreement. makes me wonder why we haven't seen a class action bad faith suit....

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  120. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    Of course, there is the argument that we're just throwing money back into the devils pocket. Actually though, we're not. MS is taking about $100's loss per unit.

    Yeah, so buying an XBox is like stealing $100 from MS. I urge you all to go buy one now!!! It's your duty as a slashdot reader!!!

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  121. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

    I seems you don't understand the concept of selling something at a loss.
    They lose MORE money if you buy it. Try to follow the logic here: Costs them $X, they sell it for $X-$100. Result: you buy one, their balance sheet is $-100. You don't buy one and their balance sheet is $0.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  122. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not an accountant, but haven't they already paid for the completed units? So they'd already be down the $X? Say they have Y units. If they sold none, they'd be down Y x $X. If they sold all Y units, they'd be down Y x $100.

    So solve for Y, I guess.

  123. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

    I'm am making the (correct...wait and see) asumption that all of the boxes will be sold to sombody. It's a safe bet.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  124. Only 8Gb hd? Insane! by WyldOne · · Score: 2

    I have some maps for UT that are 4mg is size alone. Surely they jest with us.

    I'm surprised they did not put in a 40gb drive. It about where the lower end price/size break is. (eg cost per meg)

    By my estimates its about 40gb on the low end and 80gb on the high end. Any bigger or smaller than that, and you start paying through the nose for little extra bang.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
    1. Re:Only 8Gb hd? Insane! by Armand28 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I agree! Those Microsoft devils should use larger harddrives, like what's in the GameCube and PS2!!... uh.... nevermind....

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  125. Boot ROM is 1 megabyte by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

    It's an 8 bit wide, 8 megabit (1 megabyte) part in a TSOP 40 pin package.

    The closeups the chips on the "we took one apart" pages always seem to leave this part out. It's being multiply-sourced: I've seen Hyundai, Intel and ST Micro in the various pictures, but the part number I could read was the Hyndai (now Hynix) HY29F080T-50 (pdf datasheet). I'm not sure about that -50. It was blurry and the standard part only comes in speeds up to 70ns (flash is slow, by the way).

    The code in this part is probably what needs to be hacked/replaced with something that doesn't care about signatures on boot drives if we're to load "unauthorized" software.

    You need the right equipment to get this puppy off intact (to read it in a ROM burner) and to avoid damaging the PCB, but it isn't rocket science. The trick is to heat all the pins on one side at once. A low-power microscope (when I worked in a bio lab we called 'em dissecting scopes) is a good idea too 'cause I don't think the warranty will apply if you screw it up.

    There are sockets available for this part so multiple attempts at an "open" BIOS can be made without repeated soldering.

    1. Re:Boot ROM is 1 megabyte by bunnie · · Score: 1

      Have you read out the ROM contents? I have the ROM removed and a socket installed, and I'm reading the contents out but I'm puzzled by some of the stuff I'm seeing.

  126. Fun with numbers... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2
    "I'm sure by this time next year a geforce 3 will be about $22 also (well, maybe two years)."

    Everything will be cheaper next year -- the video cards as well as the Xbox. An honest comparison would be this year's commodity hardware vs. this year's Xbox.

    BTW, the bargain-basement PC costs far more than $323 if assembly labor is factored in. I could be wrong on this, but hacking an Xbox is probably quicker than building a PC. The last time I tried to build a cheapie PC for someone, I discovered the ribbon cable on the front-panel switches and LEDs was too short to reach the motherboard (it was a hefty-sized case). I had to cut the cable and manufacture a sleazy "extension cord" out of cat.5 cable. Thirty-two stripped wires and sixteen solder connections later, it worked, but what a pain! Anyone who has built PCs knows the typical hazards: DOA parts, ill-fitting cases or cards, short-cable syndrome. These things don't happen every time, but unless you are running a PC factory where you repeatedly assemble the same configuration over and over again, you have to factor in at least a few hours to build the PC.

    1. Re:Fun with numbers... by frizz · · Score: 1

      cost of labor = (loss of 15 minutes life) * (random wage = $20/hour) = $5.
      Ok, I guess that makes it $328.

      My original intent was to point out that the X-box's video card most likely can't be upgraded.

      Anyway, the original estimate wasn't supposed to be an EXACT replacement for the X-box (20 gig drive vs. 8 gig drive, etc.). It was only meant to show that the X-box is NOT cheaper than the cheapest PC.

    2. Re:Fun with numbers... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      Does this mean you assemble PCs for $5? Do you take MC and Visa?

    3. Re:Fun with numbers... by frizz · · Score: 1

      Yes, I assemble PCs for $5. Show up at my door with the parts and I'll do it. Sorry, no credit cards, only cash.

  127. Why bother? by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing comments talking about hacking this thing into a $300 linux box.

    What's wrong with you?

    A quick visit to pricewatch.com will show you can build a higher spec'ed system yourself:
    1GHz CPU: $60
    Mobo: $60 or less
    256MB RAM: $30
    20GB HD: $70 or less
    DVD: $40 or less
    GeForce2 MX200: $40 or less
    SoundBlaster Live! Value: $20
    Total: ~$300

    You can pick up a keyboard, mouse, controller, and modem/NIC for under $30 total if you have decent computer store near you.

    If you want a console that plays its games and is also linux ready, check out the Dreamcast. It's been said many times on this forum before. $70 gets you the base system, and for $30 more you can have the keyboard and mouse too.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  128. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by cgadd · · Score: 1

    > Of course, there is the argument that we're just throwing money back into the devils pocket. Actually though, we're not. MS is taking about $100's loss per unit.

    The success of a game console is directly tied to the number of games released for it. Game developers are more willing to sign on if the console shows high sales figures. You are inflating the xbox sales figures, and so more developers will jump onboard (and even abandon other consoles). So in the end, you are helping microsoft succeed in this new market.

  129. DEBUG silkscreen by quincy_MD · · Score: 1

    The connector labeled "DEBUG" appears to be an ITP connection. Good news: Anybody with an American Arium should be able to populate the connector and do low-level software debugging. Bad News: You gotta have an American Arium (or equiv) to use it. (Ariums are around USD $17,000 if memory serves).
    The author of the article is smoking crack if he thinks "jumpering" anything in that connector is going to get him into BIOS.
    -Q (waiting to do his own X-Box Autopsy)

  130. Re:MY STUDY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true.

  131. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    Actually, I work in retail. The accounting is weird, but basically, they have paid for the boxen already. Simplisticly: ux + y + gz = d.

    where, at time=1 (launch day)
    u=number of units (XBox) made
    x=cost per XBox
    y=advertising costs
    g=number of accessories made
    z=avg. cost per accessory

    d=debt

    As time goes on, it becomes cheaper to make boxes, games, etc. This is due to the system being in place, and for the kinks to have been resolved (manufacturing, delivery, as well as service).

    Advertising costs go down as word of mouth increases also.

    If they are operating the XBox as a seperate business (remember, tax breaks for business' that report a loss), then they only make back money spent when we buy something.

    It is true that the console is their loss leader (ie the object sold purposefully at a loss to increase sales of profitable items, noted by others as games, controllers, mem cards etc), but without it, they have no continuing source of revenue.

    Don't buy the XBox, and you don't buy the games and other periferals, causing the XBox business to stay in debt for a longer period of time.

  132. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by Omerna · · Score: 2

    Of course, there is the argument that we're just throwing money back into the devils pocket. Actually though, we're not. MS is taking about $100's loss per unit.

    Keep in mind that I might buy this but...

    You do realize that if you DO NOT BUY it they'll have a MUCH GREATER loss per unit? Let's do the math. Buy one is -100 dollars for MS. Don't buy one is -400 (they cost 300 right?) for MS.

    Of course they'll get bought by somebody anyway, so buying it (with MS losing money) and then putting Linux on it is a lot more spit in MS's eye then just losing money... They have so much is just ridiculous. They could make money probably just from interest if they only charged a nominal fee for their software. (NB: Just a wild guess, I have no idea if that's true or not.)

    --


    No sig for you.
  133. like bleem but better . . . by levin · · Score: 1

    Screw ease of portability, since it is basically an nForce based PC, what is preventing people from writing an execution environment/mini os for plain old PC's that allow XBox games to be executed _natively_?

    --

    `which fortune`
  134. Re:For a site that's so virulently anti-Microsoft. by newbiescum · · Score: 1

    Think of how many of the great games came out two year later for most of the consoles. When did Gran Turismo 2, Donkey Kong, Zelda, Final Fantasy, etc. come out? Usually over a year and half past the launch. This might have to do with the fact the games are epic and need further development time, an agreement with the console maker (so that you keep up sales), or just the fact that they want to release a game with better special effects and don't want to ruin the other games.

    Do you know what was the number one selling console up till last year (even when the PS2 was out for around a year)? Yup, you guessed it, the PSOne. Oh yeah, all those PS2 games that are being raved about (GT3, GTA3, THPS3, MGS2, DMC, Ico)? It's over a year from the official launch that they're finally appearing and some of the bigger ones have yet to appear (FFX, FFXI, Jak and Daxter)...

    Also, when 2 years have passed, I bet the "winner(s)" of the console wars for this generation will have been decided, so all those that waited will play catch up. Furthermore, those waiting for price cuts, more availability, more titles, or just those that waited before buying into the hype will buy it at the later date. Not everyone gets into a frenzy over launch days.

  135. No hackers here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is spam for a wannabe. "Oh look its a hard drive"
    "Oh read the silk screen" Who cares, we can all see this for ourseleves. Give us something good. Stick your HS paste to your arse coz its getting pretty red with all that hot gas comin outta there not because theres any Oclockin goin on over there. The Dreamcast hacks from the last year or so are awesome, this is a waste of space and lots of very cheap pcs being sold by MS.

    Cheers.

  136. Rush is deaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!

    uhh...seems to me that it's dubya and his minions that want to read our email, tap our phones, have backdoors to our encryption and prosecute folks using secret military courts.

    dumbass dittohead bitch...........

    1. Re:Rush is deaf by smackmonkey · · Score: 0

      Dubya declares War For Oil In Caspian Sea Region!
      Left-wing America re-declares War On Spiderman Movie Trailer!

      --

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!
  137. Isn't it ironic.... by castlan · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you don't see the painfully delicious irony in your post. So let me spell it out for you.

    Bungee, the developer of Halo (before they were assimilated by Microsoft) was previously known for their sci-fi Doom-era superior shoot-em-up game, Marathon.

    Intense stuff.

    For a further, slightly aged dose of Irony, note that Marathon was a Macintosh based game. There was only a piddling port to Microsoft OSes much later.

  138. xbox roms & stuff by bunnie · · Score: 1

    I have a page I made that shares some of my experiences with the xbox and gamecube hardware. Of interest to those reading this thread is the XBOX rom extraction. I have the ROM binaries...but holding off on posting them on a large forum due to worries over legal ramifications...

  139. All you geeks who want Linux on XBOX are sad! by MS-Rules!!! · · Score: 1

    So you'd by an MS product, which is probably against your geeky principals, just so you could install Linux on it, after you've installed Linux a million times in your life and still have found no use for it. Just buy WindowsXP, and install all your games and apps on it. And then put that slow PS2 on the shelf and get yourself a console with a bit of power! You're life will be easier and happier in the end! Or you could just grep yourself all night, while viewing porn with Netscape on a Linux machine, all while piping yourselves up the buffer! LOSERS!

  140. Re: Salshdot loosers is called "Game Q" and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was designed and distributed by MATSUSHITA one of Nintendos strongest partners. So, its not piracy, its Matsushitas version of Gamecube.

    Slashdot is so spoiled lately.

  141. You guys will believe anything, won't you by cka · · Score: 1

    Was there this much hooplah over the phony XBOX isos, too?

    1. Re:You guys will believe anything, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well all you people bitching about people not paying are rediculas, you actually pay for the shit, why when you can get it free, they make enough money of the rest of the stupid fucks like you that they will still make the games but the differance is we will get it all for free cause we can and we will and you will pay top dollar for the sam efukcing thing, not to mention the overpriced media, so think about it you silly fucks, and save some money,along the way weeken these multi million/billion dollar companys that are making a killing and still will be when half the population of the world uses pirated media you fucks..

    2. Re:You guys will believe anything, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dood, you don't pay = game companies don't make games = no games for anyone. For all of you that don't pay, fuck you.

    3. Re:You guys will believe anything, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing that piracy only accounts to about 8% of the game players. It's like someone coming up to you, and taking 80 cents out of your pocket when you have $10. Are you REALLY gonna care that much about the 80 cents when you have $9.20 left??? Cuz if you do, then i truly feel sorry for you. On another topic, you say that piracy will lead to game companies not making games anymore??? Well, look at the PSX. One of THE best selling consoles EVER (just try to think of some people that don't have one, or had one). Now, piracy was a little too easy for that thing after about a year or so. But it still beta Saturn (no contest), and finally N64. Now, for a system that was released in ~1994 (if my math is correct) a 7 year old system is still doing pretty damn good. If you even thing of bringing up the DC for a counter, don't bother. Piracy didn't kill the DC (for the most part), but the PS2's hype did. If PS2 never came out, it would be competing with Xbox and GameCube right now (would be slowly dying, but would have had another year or so to gasp for air). I'm just trying to say basically that life is sorta like a game...if you find a weakness in your foe(this case, the spending of money) you have to take it, and you it to your advantage. *NOTE* I do NOT condone any sort of illgal piracy of any sorts. I ONLY condone the "backing-up" of video game media that you legally own.

      Just had to add that. Peace, and good luck with GC and Xbox (have a feeling the GC will be easier to back-up, but that's just a hunch :) ).

    4. Re:You guys will believe anything, won't you by CrasH3k · · Score: 1

      LOL, no it doesn't mean that, have u ever heard of Open-Source ? lotsa companies make free games, so no, the world wouldn't be "gameless" fucking idiot, go back to your registered windows 95

    5. Re:You guys will believe anything, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about flawed logic...

      "Only 8% do it." What kind of excuse is that? As each person says that the number keeps on growing. 8% becomes 20% and so on...

      The guy is right. If game companies don't make enough money, they'll find something else to sell that makes a profit. So, he's correct in saying that there will be fewer games.

      Now, have you ever played the FREE 'open source' games. I'd just like to point out that they SUCK!

      And my last rant:
      If you can't make a post w/o using vulgar language, then you really are an idiot. Who's going to be convinced by some trash talking retard who can't think of anything more intelligent to say than swearing?
      "Oh no, you called me names.. I guess I'll have to agree with you now."

      Come on guys, post some intelligent comments here.

  142. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    truth :-(

  143. Re:Buying the box wouldn't support Microsoft thoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Microsoft actually expect to lose £68-£102 on each box sold.

    Gotta remember they are gonna make some money off every piece of software produced for it though.

    Off Topic: Sony expect to lose £57 off each PS2 and Nintendo predict losses of £17-£20 of each Gamecube sold. Gotta wonder if they make these figures up though...