Huh? No, the blog was a post from a new line of e-learning stuff for vmware, the feature was released back with the original vma and made more functional with the vsphere vma. I had never read the release notes but it was correctly returned as the most relevant result. Heck to check just launch a private browsing session and do the same search.
The biggest problem is the first widely used MS OS that support EUFI was Vista x64 SP1 so system builders had basically no incentive to switch (EUFI supports BIOS emulation but if 90% of systems sold will be running the emulation why not just ship a BIOS with fewer compatibility issues).
Have you looked for a fixed location WiFi based ISP often called WISP's? My buddy in the Texas hill country that can't even get a cellphone signal from any provider uses a WISP and T-Mobile with UMA for calls.
No, he bought a device on their broadband2go plan "the only internet you'll ever need" that has been and is still advertised as unlimited data for $40/month.
I just did a quick check to see if Bing had actually improved since I last used it, I type "vmware vma password saver" without the quotes into both bing and google since I had read a blog post today about a cool feature but couldn't remember the exact command, googles first result was the vma release notes that talk about the feature, bing had no relevant results in the entire first page. Doesn't look to me like googles in any danger of losing my eyeballs.
Actually until they switched to using Yahoo's engine I continued to use it for some searches because they had the near operator which Google has yet to implement.
I wonder, is it more expensive to put up a tower and transmitter capable of reaching an entire DOT area or to pay the private sector a small fee to rent time on their existing infrastructure?
So stop putting the people on top of the cargo stack, launch them separately and have them rendezvous with the deep space vehicle en route. It's a lot easier to make a safe affordable vehicle if it's small and we already have some grasp on how to make a big payload vehicle cheap so marry the two.
RS-68B has the cooling and is estimated at $18-20M per. Since it's useful for NASA, the air force, and commercial payloads the development cost is spread over the most possible launches.
Ok, so how many non-overlapping 40MHz channels are there in the 5GHz ISM band? I honestly don't know. I know there are 23 22MHz channels available for 802.11a/n but not all of those are non-overlapping.
Because we lost the pickup truck and now only have the possibility of little capsules that can dock with assembled modules. Though I guess in theory if 23,000kg is enough to launch a habitat module with airlock, maneuvering engines and something like Canda Arm you could assemble in space. I'm not sure you save anything over an Ares V launch though, that's why we have the *really* smart people looking at it and they seem to think that a super heavy launch system is the way to go.
Because Delta IV Heavy is 23MT to LEO vs 160MT for Ares V. The proposed Falcon 9 Heavy is 32MT to LEO. Ariane 5 ES is 21MT. No commercial launcher is anywhere near big enough for a moon shot let alone a shot to Mars.
Except it won't use the SSME, they are WAY too expensive for throw aways. The RS-68 with 80% fewer parts makes WAY more sense. The line item cost of the RS-68 is $13M vs $50M for the SSME and the production line for the RS-68 is still open and all suppliers are still current.
One or two, they basically use the entire 5Ghz USM band to achieve 1080p. Now with whitespace radios now legal in the US the next generation standard might get more interesting since in theory all they have to do is find enough slices of unused bandwidth for their throughput requirements.
Slashdot Mirror
Huh? No, the blog was a post from a new line of e-learning stuff for vmware, the feature was released back with the original vma and made more functional with the vsphere vma. I had never read the release notes but it was correctly returned as the most relevant result. Heck to check just launch a private browsing session and do the same search.
The biggest problem is the first widely used MS OS that support EUFI was Vista x64 SP1 so system builders had basically no incentive to switch (EUFI supports BIOS emulation but if 90% of systems sold will be running the emulation why not just ship a BIOS with fewer compatibility issues).
Have you looked for a fixed location WiFi based ISP often called WISP's? My buddy in the Texas hill country that can't even get a cellphone signal from any provider uses a WISP and T-Mobile with UMA for calls.
Most likely he's in a margin coverage area and is falling back to 1xrtt speeds instead of EVDO, though even then he should see 60-100kbps.
It's not a smartphone plan, it's for a MiFi or USB stick!
No, he bought a device on their broadband2go plan "the only internet you'll ever need" that has been and is still advertised as unlimited data for $40/month.
Except Virgin doesn't allow BYOD. If they did I would buy a decent unlocked Android phone for the wife, they only offer the awful Samsung Intercept.
I just did a quick check to see if Bing had actually improved since I last used it, I type "vmware vma password saver" without the quotes into both bing and google since I had read a blog post today about a cool feature but couldn't remember the exact command, googles first result was the vma release notes that talk about the feature, bing had no relevant results in the entire first page. Doesn't look to me like googles in any danger of losing my eyeballs.
It even indexed mbox files intelligently =)
Actually until they switched to using Yahoo's engine I continued to use it for some searches because they had the near operator which Google has yet to implement.
You're going to make me break out lynx just for the nostalgia =)
The local fire warden won't care about their secrecy if he gets alerted to a hazmat issue.
I wonder, is it more expensive to put up a tower and transmitter capable of reaching an entire DOT area or to pay the private sector a small fee to rent time on their existing infrastructure?
If so the ipad with a custom app would be the coolest multizone controller ever.
No, there is a pipedream called Falcon X with a proposed $1B budget just to design the engines.
So stop putting the people on top of the cargo stack, launch them separately and have them rendezvous with the deep space vehicle en route. It's a lot easier to make a safe affordable vehicle if it's small and we already have some grasp on how to make a big payload vehicle cheap so marry the two.
I thought the idea was you throw the people up with Falcon 9 and the big payload with Ares V, why does the heavy lifter need to be man rated?
RS-68B has the cooling and is estimated at $18-20M per. Since it's useful for NASA, the air force, and commercial payloads the development cost is spread over the most possible launches.
Ok, so how many non-overlapping 40MHz channels are there in the 5GHz ISM band? I honestly don't know. I know there are 23 22MHz channels available for 802.11a/n but not all of those are non-overlapping.
Because we lost the pickup truck and now only have the possibility of little capsules that can dock with assembled modules. Though I guess in theory if 23,000kg is enough to launch a habitat module with airlock, maneuvering engines and something like Canda Arm you could assemble in space. I'm not sure you save anything over an Ares V launch though, that's why we have the *really* smart people looking at it and they seem to think that a super heavy launch system is the way to go.
Because Delta IV Heavy is 23MT to LEO vs 160MT for Ares V. The proposed Falcon 9 Heavy is 32MT to LEO. Ariane 5 ES is 21MT. No commercial launcher is anywhere near big enough for a moon shot let alone a shot to Mars.
Except it won't use the SSME, they are WAY too expensive for throw aways. The RS-68 with 80% fewer parts makes WAY more sense. The line item cost of the RS-68 is $13M vs $50M for the SSME and the production line for the RS-68 is still open and all suppliers are still current.
That kind is either $0 or $Thousands, I'd rather pay $5-10.
Considering digital downloads typically cost about 75-50% of a CD I would say yes, the reduction in costs is being reflected in the price.
One or two, they basically use the entire 5Ghz USM band to achieve 1080p. Now with whitespace radios now legal in the US the next generation standard might get more interesting since in theory all they have to do is find enough slices of unused bandwidth for their throughput requirements.