Yes a "new" mouse does cost money and I think that companies have the right to charge for their services but generally the biotech companies only do a cut and paste job with naturally occuring DNA sequences. As such they are not inventing anything new genetically.
It is my belief that you have no right to pattent a modification unless you have designed a new section of DNA from scratch.
We, as a collection of organisms here on earth, collectively own our genetic make up,not some thieving biotech company.
The problem with current CD's is that they are only sampled at 44.1 kHz. At this frequency you are only getting 2 samples of a 20 kHz wave cycle. Because of this you have no idea of the actual shape of the wave.
With a tip speed of 503 m/s this would be one noisy generator. I seem to recall that the speed of sound is about 350 m/s.
Nothing like a sonic shockwave to reduce turbine life span.
The laws of thermodynamics are obeyed. The energy is taken from a point in 3 space but is replenished from the time domain at the speed of light. I originally found out about this on the Department of Energy website. The inventors all hold Ph D Physics and the generator has prooven to be scientifically repeatable. As of 30 Oct 2001 the US Pattent office has granted 30 pattents for the generator. You may also be interested in reading MEGpaper.pdf (found on the site in my previous post) This document explains how the device works (If your Physics is up to it)
Help support
the research Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001
17:08:46 -0600
Dear
(correspondent):
To
give you an update:
We
already had the first action with the U.S. patent office on our first
patent for the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator.
Many of our claims were recognized.
We then entered a strong refutation of the stated reasons for declining the other claims. That refutation has been upheld, and now
we have received notification from the patent office that our first
MEG patent will be issued with all 30 claims recognized.
In addition, a second patent application has been filed, on
other aspects of the MEG device, which in the latest embodiment
variation is called the TGEN (transformer-generator).
Also,
we have now secured an agreement with the National Materials Science Laboratory of the National Academy of Science in a friendly foreign
country, to do the necessary advanced research to finish the MEG for
scale-up and commercial production. The first commercial units should
be rolling off the production lines in about one year, and we expect
them to be closed-loop self-powering systems of about 2.5 KW output,
but modular. So -- say --
four of them can be arrayed with a synchronization unit (under
development simultaneously) to produce a 10 KW output.
Two
papers on the MEG have been published in Foundations of Physics
Letter, after -- to put it mildly -- vigorous refereeing.
A high-ranking board member of the corporation owning that
series of journals personally objected to these papers on extracting
EM energy from the vacuum as "perpetual motion" nonsense.
I wrote a very strong rebuttal, also containing my solution to
the long-vexing source charge problem and its agreement with quantum
field theory and particle physics, so hung him on his own petard
unless he could explain why and how every charge and dipole in the
universe is already known to be continuously outpouring EM energy in
all directions at the speed of light, and has been doing so for some
14 billion years. Based
on that paper, the referees of the second paper rejected the formal
protest by the member of the board, and recommended publication of the
paper. Whereupon the
journal published it.
A
marvelous and very rigorous review by Myron W. Evans, who has some 600 papers in the hard literature, will be in the forthcoming second
edition of Modern Nonlinear Optics, Wiley, 2001.
I also have a paper on the MEG in one of the three volumes, and
a second paper on the principles for extracting EM energy from the
vacuum.
As
stated, in 2000 after about three years work I also solved what has
been called the most difficult problem in electrodynamics: the
association of the fields and potentials with their source charge.
This year I found very strong support for my solution in Mandl
and Shaw, Quantum Field Theory, Chapter five. The
solution is also strongly supported by the known broken symmetry of opposite charges -- such as the two ends of a dipole -- in particle
physics. Lee and Yang
received the Nobel Prize in 1957 for the prediction of broken symmetry, which was experimentally proven by Wu et al. in early 1957.
So revolutionary was broken equilibrium to all of physics, that
the Nobel Prize Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang the
same year, in Dec. 1957! So
it appears the solution is rock solid and will hold up.
It also is what really allows EM energy to be easily extracted
from the active vacuum.
Further,
at least three other inventors have working overunity systems as well.
Recently one of these inventors -- a close colleague of many
years -- and I solved another formidable problem: the problem of
close-looping an overunity electrical power system.
Contrary to prevailing opinion, this is not a trivial task at
all, but is a most formidable one involving some very novel physics
indeed. We have now filed
a patent application upon that process -- for stabilizing, locking,
and close-looping an overunity system into stable disequilibrium COP>1.0 operation.
I
also will have a book published by World Scientific, early 2002,
giving the complete concepts and principles of overunity electrical
power systems freely extracting their energy from the vacuum.
With
Evans' magnificent paper, we shall have put EM energy from the vacuum very solidly into the scientific literature.
The
energy crisis can be completely solved and self-powering (powered by
the vacuum) generators and power systems quickly developed, whenever
the scientific community will allow the work to be funded.
It can also be solved in a way that will make the environmental
community very happy, because nuclear power plants, burning of
hydrocarbons in power plants, a great variety of hydrocarbon-burning
small engines, etc. can be replaced eventually by energy from the
vacuum-powered systems. In
one year or so, we ourselves will be introducing our first commercial
power plant on the world market, as stated.
For
your personal information, there are several Japanese COP>1.0
systems that have been removed from the market by the Yakuza.
One -- the Kawai system, can be built directly according to the
patent if one starts with a high efficiency Hitachi magnetic motor of
0.7 or 0.8 efficiency. Kawai,
his company, and his system were taken over in 1996 by the Yakuza,
right here in Huntsville Alabama, in my physical presence, and in the
presence of the members of my Board of Directors.
The
broken symmetry of opposite charges -- such as on the ends of a source dipole, e.g., -- has been well-known in particle physics for nearly a
half-century, as we stated. Simply
see why Lee and Yang was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Also, please check out what "broken symmetry" means
in particle physics, and what it rigorously says about a dipole or
dipolarity. It means that
the dipole continuously absorbs unusable virtual photons from the
seething vacuum (actually from the time domain; see my Giant
Negentropy paper and Mandl and Shaw's book), transduces that energy
into real observable energy, and re-emits it in all directions as
real, observable energy in 3-space, flowing away in all directions
continuously at the speed of light.
A charge does the same thing (I simply treated the isolated
observable charge with its concomitant clustering virtual charges as a
set of composite dipoles). If
you suddenly make a little dipole, and wait one year, the energy
pouring out from that dipole will have changed the energy density of
space in a sphere of one lightyear in radius.
And it will still be pouring out the energy at the speed of
light. The dipoles (and charges) in the original matter in the universe have been doing this
for some 14 billion years. This
is a true giant negentropy process, and hopefully it will initiate the
engineering of negentropy instead of always negentropy, using stabilized disequilibrium COP>1.0 systems.
Yet
heartbreakingly, the vacuum interaction has not even been added into
the 137-year-old classical EM model used to design and build our
electrical power systems. Needless
to say, neither is a broken symmetry in that interaction present in
the model. Check this
with a particle physicist skilled in broken symmetry, not with a
classical electrodynamicist. Or
read T.D. Lee's work, to establish the broken symmetry of two opposite
charges (the dipole).
Every
charge and dipole in matter, has been pouring out energy from the vacuum (it actually comes from the time domain, and is time-energy
converted to 3-spatial energy) for some 14 or so billion years.
In
other words, it is extraordinarily simple and trivial to provide "electromagnetic winds" of gushing EM energy from the
vacuum, at will, anywhere in the universe.
Just produce some charge or make a simple dipole, then leave it
alone. It will pour out
energy indefinitely and freely, so long as the charge or dipole
exists.
It
follows that it is simply a technical problem to (1) intercept some of
that freely outpouring energy flow once we make the dipole and pay for
that, (2) dissipate the collected energy in a load to do useful work,
and (3) do this without using half the collected energy to destroy the
dipole and stop the free flow of energy from the vacuum.
The
present ubiquitous closed-current loop circuit, containing the source
dipole itself, as used in electrical power engineering guarantees that
half the EM energy collected in the external circuit is used to
forcibly ram the spent electrons in the ground return line back
through the back emf of the source dipole, knocking the charges apart
and destroying the dipole. That
process self-enforces the re-institution of the Lorentz symmetrical
regauging condition, and the equilibrium condition.
It absolutely guarantees that such a self-killing circuit
cannot produce COP>1.0. That
is not nature's prohibition nor the prohibition of physics and
thermodynamics. It is
merely the prohibition in the classical Lorentz-regauged model and the
foolishness of the manner in which we build all our circuits to be
equilibrium circuits vis a vis any exchange with the active vacuum.
In
other words, our engineers universally "put the windmill in a
closed barn", so to speak, so that no
net winds can get to it to turn it freely.
In that case, it is not surprising that we ourselves have to
input the energy to keep the darn thing turning and powering its load!
Generators
do not power their external circuits by any energy transduced from the
shaft energy input. The
mechanical shaft energy furnished to the generator is transduced into
internal magnetic energy inside the generator, which in turn is
totally dissipated on the generator's own internal charges to
continuously reform the source dipole -- that the engineers
diabolically design the circuit to destroy faster than the load can be
powered. That is the
reason and the only reason that present power systems are COP1.0.
All the Poynting energy to power the external circuit -- and
all the Heaviside nondiverged extra energy flow missing the circuit
and wasted -- is extracted from the vacuum via the broken symmetry of
the source dipole. Every
system we ever built is vacuum-energy powered, not powered by
hydrocarbon combustion, spillways on dams, windmills, solar cells,
etc. No university in the
Western world even teaches -- or knows -- what actually powers the
electrical circuits they so confidently teach and utilize.
Frankly,
the environmentalists have been "had" now for quite some
time. It would be most
desirable if they actually did some foundations work and examination
of electrodynamics, and particularly of the broken symmetry of the dipole. For that, they
will have to go to the appropriate particle physicists, not the
electrical engineers or the classical electrodynamicists.
All
the hydrocarbons ever burned, hydroturbine generators ever tapping
water from a dam, windmills using the wind energy, and nuclear power
plants heating water to make steam to run the steam turbine turning
the generator, have accomplished one thing and one thing only: they
have continuously restored the dipole that the diabolically designed
external power line and closed current loop circuits continuously
destroy faster than they power their loads.
All that horrendous destruction and contamination of the
biosphere has never added a single watt to the power line.
It has only remade and remade and remade the needlessly-destroyed dipoles countless times.
Needless
to say, in my opinion that horrible mangling of the biosphere, destruction of species, pollution of the planet, and insane way of
designing electrical power systems is -- to borrow a phrase from
Nikola Tesla -- the most inexplicable aberration of the scientific
mind ever recorded in history.
It
would be wonderful if the environmental community would in fact hire
some leading particle physicists skilled in symmetry and broken
symmetry, to prove to them the truth of the above statement.
The shaft horsepower delivered to the shaft of the generator
does not power the external power line.
It only remakes the source dipole.
The dipole, once made, freely extracts the energy from the vacuum and sends it out of the terminals and through space outside the conductors. A small
component of that energy flow in space is diverted into the conductors
to power the electrons. All
the rest of the energy flow just misses the circuit entirely and is
wasted. The existence of
the Lorentz-discarded Heaviside nondiverged flow component is
demonstrated decisively by the Bohren
experiment.
The
Bohren experiment, e.g., simply resonates the intercepting charges instead of leaving them static. The
definition of the "magnitude" (actually, the local point
intensity and NOT the magnitude!) of a potential or field is defined purely as its reaction cross section presented in its interaction with
an assumed unit point static charge at any point.
By resonating the charge, it sweeps out a greater geometrical
area, thus simply increasing the reaction cross section by the charge
also penetrating outside the Poynting static reaction cross section
and into the usually nondiverged Heaviside energy flow component.
Thus the resonant charge simply intercepts some 18 times as much energy as is in the Poynting static cross section region of
interception, by increasing the region of interception.
So it intercepts more energy from that component not normally
intercepted by a nonresonant charge, thereby proving that the extra
(usually nondiverged) Heaviside component is physically present.
The
Bohren experiment outputs some 18 times as much energy as the experimenter inputs, since the input calculation ignores that
"nondiverged" component discovered by Heaviside in the
1880s, and discarded very shortly thereafter by Lorentz.
Poynting never considered anything except the energy component
that actually enters the circuit.
Heaviside considered it all, both that component that is
intercepted and the huge remaining component that lies outside the
Poynting flow component. Simply
check the original papers cited below.
I
also urge you to check the AIAS paper in Physica Scripta, cited below.
It gives more than a dozen mechanisms to explore for the design
and development of overunity systems that extract EM energy from the
vacuum.
Very
best wishes,
Tom
Bearden, Ph.D.
Since the early 1900's inventors have been designing and building free energy (greater than 100% efficiency) generators for mechanical and electrical power generation, yet these alternative energy machines lay unused.
This is one of the joys of living in a capatalist society. If the general population knew that they don't need oil or power companies for their power requirements the biggest sources of financial and political influence would cease to exist.
If you want an example of this technology try http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm
This motionless electromagnetic generator relies on the 4d theories of space/time and currently operates at an efficiency of 500%.
If you want more info try a google on free energy machines.
Spread the word.
Andrew.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes a "new" mouse does cost money and I think that companies have the right to charge for their services but generally the biotech companies only do a cut and paste job with naturally occuring DNA sequences. As such they are not inventing anything new genetically. It is my belief that you have no right to pattent a modification unless you have designed a new section of DNA from scratch. We, as a collection of organisms here on earth, collectively own our genetic make up,not some thieving biotech company.
The problem with current CD's is that they are only sampled at 44.1 kHz. At this frequency you are only getting 2 samples of a 20 kHz wave cycle. Because of this you have no idea of the actual shape of the wave.
With a tip speed of 503 m/s this would be one noisy generator. I seem to recall that the speed of sound is about 350 m/s. Nothing like a sonic shockwave to reduce turbine life span.
There is NO UNIVERSAL FRAME OF REFERENCE.
I would have assumed that the epicenter of the Big Bang would be the only place in the universe with a zero velocity.
Now all we need is for the scientists to come up with an artificial uterus. Never shall we be nagged again ;)
The laws of thermodynamics are obeyed. The energy is taken from a point in 3 space but is replenished from the time domain at the speed of light. I originally found out about this on the Department of Energy website. The inventors all hold Ph D Physics and the generator has prooven to be scientifically repeatable. As of 30 Oct 2001 the US Pattent office has granted 30 pattents for the generator. You may also be interested in reading MEGpaper.pdf (found on the site in my previous post) This document explains how the device works (If your Physics is up to it)
Help support
the research Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001
17:08:46 -0600
Dear
(correspondent):
To
give you an update:
We
already had the first action with the U.S. patent office on our first
patent for the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator.
Many of our claims were recognized.
We then entered a strong refutation of the stated reasons for declining the other claims. That refutation has been upheld, and now
we have received notification from the patent office that our first
MEG patent will be issued with all 30 claims recognized.
In addition, a second patent application has been filed, on
other aspects of the MEG device, which in the latest embodiment
variation is called the TGEN (transformer-generator).
Also,
we have now secured an agreement with the National Materials Science Laboratory of the National Academy of Science in a friendly foreign
country, to do the necessary advanced research to finish the MEG for
scale-up and commercial production. The first commercial units should
be rolling off the production lines in about one year, and we expect
them to be closed-loop self-powering systems of about 2.5 KW output,
but modular. So -- say --
four of them can be arrayed with a synchronization unit (under
development simultaneously) to produce a 10 KW output.
Two
papers on the MEG have been published in Foundations of Physics
Letter, after -- to put it mildly -- vigorous refereeing.
A high-ranking board member of the corporation owning that
series of journals personally objected to these papers on extracting
EM energy from the vacuum as "perpetual motion" nonsense.
I wrote a very strong rebuttal, also containing my solution to
the long-vexing source charge problem and its agreement with quantum
field theory and particle physics, so hung him on his own petard
unless he could explain why and how every charge and dipole in the
universe is already known to be continuously outpouring EM energy in
all directions at the speed of light, and has been doing so for some
14 billion years. Based
on that paper, the referees of the second paper rejected the formal
protest by the member of the board, and recommended publication of the
paper. Whereupon the
journal published it.
A
marvelous and very rigorous review by Myron W. Evans, who has some 600 papers in the hard literature, will be in the forthcoming second
edition of Modern Nonlinear Optics, Wiley, 2001.
I also have a paper on the MEG in one of the three volumes, and
a second paper on the principles for extracting EM energy from the
vacuum.
As
stated, in 2000 after about three years work I also solved what has
been called the most difficult problem in electrodynamics: the
association of the fields and potentials with their source charge.
This year I found very strong support for my solution in Mandl
and Shaw, Quantum Field Theory, Chapter five. The
solution is also strongly supported by the known broken symmetry of opposite charges -- such as the two ends of a dipole -- in particle
physics. Lee and Yang
received the Nobel Prize in 1957 for the prediction of broken symmetry, which was experimentally proven by Wu et al. in early 1957.
So revolutionary was broken equilibrium to all of physics, that
the Nobel Prize Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang the
same year, in Dec. 1957! So
it appears the solution is rock solid and will hold up.
It also is what really allows EM energy to be easily extracted
from the active vacuum.
Further,
at least three other inventors have working overunity systems as well.
Recently one of these inventors -- a close colleague of many
years -- and I solved another formidable problem: the problem of
close-looping an overunity electrical power system.
Contrary to prevailing opinion, this is not a trivial task at
all, but is a most formidable one involving some very novel physics
indeed. We have now filed
a patent application upon that process -- for stabilizing, locking,
and close-looping an overunity system into stable disequilibrium COP>1.0 operation.
I
also will have a book published by World Scientific, early 2002,
giving the complete concepts and principles of overunity electrical
power systems freely extracting their energy from the vacuum.
With
Evans' magnificent paper, we shall have put EM energy from the vacuum very solidly into the scientific literature.
The
energy crisis can be completely solved and self-powering (powered by
the vacuum) generators and power systems quickly developed, whenever
the scientific community will allow the work to be funded.
It can also be solved in a way that will make the environmental
community very happy, because nuclear power plants, burning of
hydrocarbons in power plants, a great variety of hydrocarbon-burning
small engines, etc. can be replaced eventually by energy from the
vacuum-powered systems. In
one year or so, we ourselves will be introducing our first commercial
power plant on the world market, as stated.
For
your personal information, there are several Japanese COP>1.0
systems that have been removed from the market by the Yakuza.
One -- the Kawai system, can be built directly according to the
patent if one starts with a high efficiency Hitachi magnetic motor of
0.7 or 0.8 efficiency. Kawai,
his company, and his system were taken over in 1996 by the Yakuza,
right here in Huntsville Alabama, in my physical presence, and in the
presence of the members of my Board of Directors.
The
broken symmetry of opposite charges -- such as on the ends of a source dipole, e.g., -- has been well-known in particle physics for nearly a
half-century, as we stated. Simply
see why Lee and Yang was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Also, please check out what "broken symmetry" means
in particle physics, and what it rigorously says about a dipole or
dipolarity. It means that
the dipole continuously absorbs unusable virtual photons from the
seething vacuum (actually from the time domain; see my Giant
Negentropy paper and Mandl and Shaw's book), transduces that energy
into real observable energy, and re-emits it in all directions as
real, observable energy in 3-space, flowing away in all directions
continuously at the speed of light.
A charge does the same thing (I simply treated the isolated
observable charge with its concomitant clustering virtual charges as a
set of composite dipoles). If
you suddenly make a little dipole, and wait one year, the energy
pouring out from that dipole will have changed the energy density of
space in a sphere of one lightyear in radius.
And it will still be pouring out the energy at the speed of
light. The dipoles (and charges) in the original matter in the universe have been doing this
for some 14 billion years. This
is a true giant negentropy process, and hopefully it will initiate the
engineering of negentropy instead of always negentropy, using stabilized disequilibrium COP>1.0 systems.
Yet
heartbreakingly, the vacuum interaction has not even been added into
the 137-year-old classical EM model used to design and build our
electrical power systems. Needless
to say, neither is a broken symmetry in that interaction present in
the model. Check this
with a particle physicist skilled in broken symmetry, not with a
classical electrodynamicist. Or
read T.D. Lee's work, to establish the broken symmetry of two opposite
charges (the dipole).
Every
charge and dipole in matter, has been pouring out energy from the vacuum (it actually comes from the time domain, and is time-energy
converted to 3-spatial energy) for some 14 or so billion years.
In
other words, it is extraordinarily simple and trivial to provide "electromagnetic winds" of gushing EM energy from the
vacuum, at will, anywhere in the universe.
Just produce some charge or make a simple dipole, then leave it
alone. It will pour out
energy indefinitely and freely, so long as the charge or dipole
exists.
It
follows that it is simply a technical problem to (1) intercept some of
that freely outpouring energy flow once we make the dipole and pay for
that, (2) dissipate the collected energy in a load to do useful work,
and (3) do this without using half the collected energy to destroy the
dipole and stop the free flow of energy from the vacuum.
The
present ubiquitous closed-current loop circuit, containing the source
dipole itself, as used in electrical power engineering guarantees that
half the EM energy collected in the external circuit is used to
forcibly ram the spent electrons in the ground return line back
through the back emf of the source dipole, knocking the charges apart
and destroying the dipole. That
process self-enforces the re-institution of the Lorentz symmetrical
regauging condition, and the equilibrium condition.
It absolutely guarantees that such a self-killing circuit
cannot produce COP>1.0. That
is not nature's prohibition nor the prohibition of physics and
thermodynamics. It is
merely the prohibition in the classical Lorentz-regauged model and the
foolishness of the manner in which we build all our circuits to be
equilibrium circuits vis a vis any exchange with the active vacuum.
In
other words, our engineers universally "put the windmill in a
closed barn", so to speak, so that no
net winds can get to it to turn it freely.
In that case, it is not surprising that we ourselves have to
input the energy to keep the darn thing turning and powering its load!
Generators
do not power their external circuits by any energy transduced from the
shaft energy input. The
mechanical shaft energy furnished to the generator is transduced into
internal magnetic energy inside the generator, which in turn is
totally dissipated on the generator's own internal charges to
continuously reform the source dipole -- that the engineers
diabolically design the circuit to destroy faster than the load can be
powered. That is the
reason and the only reason that present power systems are COP1.0.
All the Poynting energy to power the external circuit -- and
all the Heaviside nondiverged extra energy flow missing the circuit
and wasted -- is extracted from the vacuum via the broken symmetry of
the source dipole. Every
system we ever built is vacuum-energy powered, not powered by
hydrocarbon combustion, spillways on dams, windmills, solar cells,
etc. No university in the
Western world even teaches -- or knows -- what actually powers the
electrical circuits they so confidently teach and utilize.
Frankly,
the environmentalists have been "had" now for quite some
time. It would be most
desirable if they actually did some foundations work and examination
of electrodynamics, and particularly of the broken symmetry of the dipole. For that, they
will have to go to the appropriate particle physicists, not the
electrical engineers or the classical electrodynamicists.
All
the hydrocarbons ever burned, hydroturbine generators ever tapping
water from a dam, windmills using the wind energy, and nuclear power
plants heating water to make steam to run the steam turbine turning
the generator, have accomplished one thing and one thing only: they
have continuously restored the dipole that the diabolically designed
external power line and closed current loop circuits continuously
destroy faster than they power their loads.
All that horrendous destruction and contamination of the
biosphere has never added a single watt to the power line.
It has only remade and remade and remade the needlessly-destroyed dipoles countless times.
Needless
to say, in my opinion that horrible mangling of the biosphere, destruction of species, pollution of the planet, and insane way of
designing electrical power systems is -- to borrow a phrase from
Nikola Tesla -- the most inexplicable aberration of the scientific
mind ever recorded in history.
It
would be wonderful if the environmental community would in fact hire
some leading particle physicists skilled in symmetry and broken
symmetry, to prove to them the truth of the above statement.
The shaft horsepower delivered to the shaft of the generator
does not power the external power line.
It only remakes the source dipole.
The dipole, once made, freely extracts the energy from the vacuum and sends it out of the terminals and through space outside the conductors. A small
component of that energy flow in space is diverted into the conductors
to power the electrons. All
the rest of the energy flow just misses the circuit entirely and is
wasted. The existence of
the Lorentz-discarded Heaviside nondiverged flow component is
demonstrated decisively by the Bohren
experiment.
The
Bohren experiment, e.g., simply resonates the intercepting charges instead of leaving them static. The
definition of the "magnitude" (actually, the local point
intensity and NOT the magnitude!) of a potential or field is defined purely as its reaction cross section presented in its interaction with
an assumed unit point static charge at any point.
By resonating the charge, it sweeps out a greater geometrical
area, thus simply increasing the reaction cross section by the charge
also penetrating outside the Poynting static reaction cross section
and into the usually nondiverged Heaviside energy flow component.
Thus the resonant charge simply intercepts some 18 times as much energy as is in the Poynting static cross section region of
interception, by increasing the region of interception.
So it intercepts more energy from that component not normally
intercepted by a nonresonant charge, thereby proving that the extra
(usually nondiverged) Heaviside component is physically present.
The
Bohren experiment outputs some 18 times as much energy as the experimenter inputs, since the input calculation ignores that
"nondiverged" component discovered by Heaviside in the
1880s, and discarded very shortly thereafter by Lorentz.
Poynting never considered anything except the energy component
that actually enters the circuit.
Heaviside considered it all, both that component that is
intercepted and the huge remaining component that lies outside the
Poynting flow component. Simply
check the original papers cited below.
I
also urge you to check the AIAS paper in Physica Scripta, cited below.
It gives more than a dozen mechanisms to explore for the design
and development of overunity systems that extract EM energy from the
vacuum.
Very
best wishes,
Tom
Bearden, Ph.D.
Since the early 1900's inventors have been designing and building free energy (greater than 100% efficiency) generators for mechanical and electrical power generation, yet these alternative energy machines lay unused. This is one of the joys of living in a capatalist society. If the general population knew that they don't need oil or power companies for their power requirements the biggest sources of financial and political influence would cease to exist. If you want an example of this technology try http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm This motionless electromagnetic generator relies on the 4d theories of space/time and currently operates at an efficiency of 500%. If you want more info try a google on free energy machines. Spread the word. Andrew.