AT LEAST 1/2 of the posts in this thread prove out the knead for recognition of the deceptive rhetoricystic practices employed by the kingdumb of FUD. what to do about I.T. is a hole nether kwesteeon.
It would seam that j. public is at least somewhat awear of the situation, and it would also seam that he/she IS very open to alternatives available to the MS decade of deceit marketeering plan.
1 of the problems is that FUDbillygates has built an udderly incredible cash cow with the windose meganopoly. his ONLY means to protect it are: MS BS PR FUD, and sum bogus contracts (institutions, OEMs) established through the use of bribery, coercion, and FUD. it's (FUD) kNoT working like it used to, butt it still has life.
sew, I.T.s likely going to take a similarly monumental effort to get the truth about I.T. owt to the masses. appears that effort is well underway, but subject to the same pollutants that made FUDley whatever he is today. a real dali llama. i guess evolution is still happening. my impressions are that open-source is going to knead some very impressive open/honest "marketing" in order to save the universe from a future of pure FUD, and that love eminates from the home desktop.
I can understand Mr. Perens' reaction, as I have suffered the same in regard to feeling the need to protect a concept.
One defense is that we are so innundated with corpirate BS, that we can be left suspicious of every action by any1 that is connected to megaslothism.
It is clear that Mr. Perens has worked VERY hard (understatement) to promote/protect the concepts of o-s. He should be able to feel proud of his efforts, and not be judged per incident. same goes for Mr. Stallman, & Mr. Raymond. Obviously, peoples' emotions/personalities, are exposed in their efforts to work towards goals. look at FUDbilLIEgates.
Experience that evokes my empathy:
Last year, sensing the rise in (commercial) popularity of linux/o-s/gnu, and the corresponding onslaught of MS BS PR trashing, of the concepts/community, I felt inspired to do some protectionary things.
I registered a whole bunch of linux/o-s related.coms/nets/orgs, with the main goal of keeping deceptive megasloth greedmongers from getting them. I then offered their use, for advertising/information to any/all in the community for free. I figured that I would at least break even on the expenses (enormous, and growing), and serve to promote the concepts that offer an alternative to megasloth greedmonger control of all that is PC.
Well, the results were/are less than stunning. However, i have managed to retain control of a whole bunch of urls, and HAVE NOT succumbed to the sizable offers of fortune from the deceptive marketeer community.
Anyway, the moral to the story, to me, is: all form of GOOD intention can be misconstrued, when negative judgement is applied, based on suspicious reaction due to preconceived notions, that are inaccurate.
doesn't mean I'm going to start trusting in the kingdumb of fud.
We haven't changed a bit in what we are attempting to accomplish, which is promotion of the concepts of gnu/linux/o-s. any positive input is appreciated. we've already heard ALL the reasons why knot.
I too worked for a decade developing database information systems for hospitals, clinics, etc...
What a quagmirish mess. In a typical larger facility, there would be dozens of seperate unconnected databases per patient. healthcare's recent answer to this, has been the development of data repositories (connecting the disparage of inf.), followed by efforts to merge reports from the relevant inf..
In my estimation, the medical/healthcare system would be served by coming to a standard interview format/health status screening, for this to happen, the medical/healthcare profession would need to approach the o-s community with the intention of same.
The result could be, a uniform patient assessment across an almost insolvent industry. part of the reason for the near insolvency, is the inability of the players to be able to agree on ANYTHING (therefore, scattering their info$ to the WINd), even though they ALL strive to obtain the same information.
The next part, that is also a shambles, is the notion of providing patients with a minimum amount of privacy concerning their medical records. recently, uncle s(h)am, at the behest of mr/ms megasloth, granted "business" a pretty much free access pass to the medical records of almost anybody who does "business" with a bank. can marketeers of everything else be far behind?
Since the net became a thing, I have found patient databases sitting on ftp sites, which speaks to the lax attitude of practitioners, as well as the lack of knowledge of webmasters re: the importance of keeping such records private.
We would be interested in discussion re: this situation with any/all interested, as it does not get any attention, in comparison to the gravity of the situation.
If a useable solution to the mess were to be developed, it would by it's very nature, be open-source.
I must be missing some things. FUDbillygates is willing to become so tactical as to risk the possibility of ending up sharing a cell with john gotti, to widose the browser "market". but no 1 in the o-s community can whip together a gui browser to meet/debunk the onslaught of FUDulistic invasionofprivacy virusfriendly blight that IEaaaggghhh is?
seems important enough to me. does look like noescape is dropping the ball, through little fault of theirs, i'd say. maybe it's kNoT important, even though it seams that the gui based www is expecting to run most, if not all their apps, in a browser. is it that difficult?
seems like, with the recently acquired billyuns of several o-s? companies? that might be a priority?
letting billygates coupdeville this, seems like surrendering after you've won.
reminds me of the time i spoke out on a NYT forum about what i consider to be the crimewave of disinformation and gottiesque control of the PC/software industry that is exhibited by FUDbillygates.
soon (within a couple of months) 1 of my non-profit websites started disappearing from several of the "major" search engines. first, from MSNasty.con, which was okeydokey by me, butt then from hotbot etc.., where it had been the #1 answer for searches on the topic for over a year. the site is still the #1 visited for its topic (small audience) on the web. butt there is an immoral to the story.
eventually (hopefully), these types of deception will be resolved, butt knot b4 millions more folks are MiSled.
hay FUDbillygates, can you tell us how many professional rhetoricyst talknicians you have working the web, filling up public forums & such with volumes of MSBS, not counting the # of "journalists" in your employ, & how much all that costs your customers/victims/stock holders?
Is all that lying really helpful to anyone?
Is there any study underway to assess the cost of lost time/productivity due to the shoddily engineered MSbugware, and/or the pathetic vulnerability of same to all form of virulent code.
Do you really think it's too late for you to get honest with the world? i do.
I'm still a little miffed with you for deleting my non-profit website from all those search engines, as you may have noticed. see you in the funny papers.
I've written several times before. first to moderate flameage, then to 0 response. what i'm saying makes sense. 41thing, penguin needs a slightly more friendly gui user interface. developers (IBM) are writing ok stuff. too bad it takes out part of your system if you reject it. if stuff using the tools already available in most distributions were maid easier, there would be less need for use of overkill systems to manage small jobe. i don't know, it seems as though it was easier to make a small biz dbase system using lotus, or even foxpro.
the off-topic part is: we still have several 10's of linux/o-s related.coms/.orgs to be used. we have heard from many re: advertising stuff, butt we feel it's less than high value. please do feel free to contact us re: use of linux/o-s related.coms, as they require genuinely long term value offerings/availabilities.
It sure looks like the OS is free now. so is the interface for dummys. give us some colabradornation at linuxville.com.
we've got some other nifty.coms that SHOULD NOT be absorbed by the borg. we have linus-torvalds.org. what are we supposed to do with that? thegreatestgood.org is earmarked 4sum nones in WI (Sisters of the Dominican Mother House). knot that thaid no watt 2 doo. they WILL when i'm dumb. i'll write to them tomorrow.
i have no problem with lairy & bob being billionaires, they work hard.
problem is, what about the several million folks who are responsible for the vehicle they used to be vaulted to their high station?
me, i'm just a fool, whose tired as hell of seeing a handful of megasloths, or any minority, profiting excessively from the efforts of the majority.
i'm also tired of beggin y'all to look past the BS, and get with the program.
by now, there SHOULD be 100's of linux/opensource.coms/orgs up to let the WORLD know what the penguin can do for business, with free? ads from at least 10,000 of y'all.
instead, there's 5-10, that are news, and 5-20 that offer pretty much proprietary products for sale.
we (that's me) STILL have around 100 o-s/linux related.coms/orgs intended (from the start) for use by the o-s/linux community (no bosses) to spread the message, and draw in the functional PC starved public.
there are some really cool commercial names in the lot, and some were gotten solely with the intent of promoting community. anyway, they are pretty much unused, other than a penguin picture, and/or ads for stuff we do that doesn't need to be there.
i was led to think that some of y'all's "leaders" were going to help me with disposition. butt it looks like their agendas DO NOT include empowering majorities.
my motives are about seeing that there's more than a few powers near the top. should be more like 1000's. perhaps arranged geographically. some of us have already lived through 1 dictatorship, NEVER again.
if you wait for commerce to trickle down to y'all from bob & lairy, your potential for world domination (in the most generous sense) will evaporate. don't you think pudbillygates is also going to cash in on/co-opt the penguin? gawd, geezeus, y'all seem so anti-inertial.
if you have interest, please contact us, harryjo@imcnet.net. as i've said before, and probably will keep trying to say, we want to help, we need YOUR help.
sorry for any excessive emotional attachment. i'm sick & tired of seeing joe public, or joe penguin, or any joe, getting the sh*t end of the stick.
if the.com is already paid for, it can be used for any good idea, if it isn't paid for yet, cough up a few bucks and become a co-conspirator. i say, flood the net with honest to business penguin/o-s power. we've had the opportunity to sell some to megasloths, but have been able to avoid having to do so. we registered them with the intention of preventing megsloth greedmongers (you know who they are) from getting them. and maybe for collecting some advertising income. many of them are not paid for yet, but we are working to pay for all. if we weren't shoestringing, they'd be free4all forever. save the penguin from being cornered, and get work for yourself. i'm sure y'all have some great ideas, i know i do. can't do it without you.
go ahead, just shoot me. i'm definitely inferno bait.
pudbillygates is the john gotti of the digital era. so what? his own MSBS PR/marketing depts. seem to be doing a bang up job of diminishing his influence.
what should be even more alarming to y'all, is the megasloth attempts to monotize the penguin. again, i have no problem with folks making money, but for a handful (chosen by who?), to profit excessively (with a capitalistic E), is way too much like the same old shit.
read (past tense) a couple quotes from VAlairy Allgutsteen this week. he says, and i quote: "who needs.coms, when you've got linux?" can't say he's all wrong there, but try to follow the thread.
next, he says: "there's only room enough in the market for 4-5 major linux distributions."
this is where y'all can torch me some more, butt i think this type of HYPEnosis is Krap. whois gonna be major? i'm guessing lairy is right up there. that only leaves room for who few?
sounds way too close to the flippers turning into claws syndrome to me. at least don't try to tell me it never happens. i KNOW better.
y'all need to pay close attention. makes what Mr. Stallman says, sound like A LOT of sense, again.
as i've stated before, we have A LOT of o-s/linux related web resources, and we're thinking there ought to be MANY major FREE distributions and/or, cheap PC sites.
letting the penguin be cornered, could prove disasterous to the majority, in the long haul. not to mention the potential for scandalizing the penguin's thus far high integrity rating. i'm guessing the penguin's got some long coattails, unless they're cropped by "business" interests.
no, i'm just saying it did not work for me. y'all are absolutely positive that there is no politiking going on in the race for the billions, right? i have 0 favorite in the race. my spelling is atroseeus, so what.
why would a pkg. (oh excuse me DISTRO) be product of the year, if it doesn't work?
netscape came with the SuSE pkg.. sorry if my terminology isn't up to snuff.
there was no support, other than e-mail, that was not answered.
y'all is mighty touchy. i'm about as groan as i want to be. i expressed an experience, and an opinion, pardon me all to haites.
In a time pronounced by the BSmediaHYPE machine as the height of economic prosperity, we will stand by as our REAL accomplishments are declared irrelevant so megaslothgreedmongers can avoid paying taxes on their ill-gotten gains.
also noteworthy, recent legislation (already passed in NY) makes it ok for banks to peruse your medical records to determine your bankworthiness. another crime against us all, in order to feed the machine.
It's EASY to blame, WE are responsible. WE have put our well being in the hands of megamaniacal greedmongers. WE appear to be too busy running for our options, to even complain as our rights are discarded.
there WILL be reprocussions. fortunately, some dogooders are STILL able to influence the tide of the infowars.
y'all STILL don't get it. do you think nsi sqeezing the low budget netrepreneur out is going to allow joe/josephine blow to get the "right".com for his/her purposes.
wrong, it just allows megaslothgreedmongersmongers more ability to monopolize. maybe you would just as soon see pudbillygates felonious farce lighting up most of the urls on the web. some are amiable to greed up to just such a happenstance. get real. pay attention. that doesn't cost much.
i'm reposting my comments from previous negative article re: "domain hogs", 'cause it's important to TRY to get the WHOLE picture.
i'm harry brown, the.com f'in idiot (Score:1) by harenet on Sunday July 11, @06:42AM EDT (#216) (User Info) as the "king" inferred, "selling".coms IS a misnomer.
obviously,.comming would be MOSTLY about developing a VARIETY of COMMERCIAL web endeavors.
however, the reasons to do so are just as varied.
what MOST of y'all are missing, i suspect through pre-commercial web etiquette, or something, is that you're GIVING away the farm.
which is not to say that that's a bad thing, except, there's gottis out here (you didn't know) who would take the farm.
MANY MANY of the.coms,.orgs etc... that we have, we cannot ethically, or morally, "sell", to just anybody (although we've certainly been tempted). and MANY of our.coms, ARE NOT available for "sale". it is a huge responsibility.
MANY of the domains we have registered/paid for, are intended to promote/protect, things far beyond the value system of the currently burgeoning IPO generation. which is not to say getting money is bad.
I have offered FREE.com space to MANY so called promoters of the EXTREMELY valid concepts of open-source, and/or the miracle to modern technology that linux is, only to be shunned and disdained, as some bearer of subterfuge. the 1's who have have expressed interest, i find to be honest, open, and insightful (as advertised). we have also been approached/punished by some who are interested in only the greedmonger aspects of the web. it's scary.
i wrote to mr. malda several times regarding helping to stock a few of my open-source/linux related.coms/orgs with relevant content, and to promote my non-profit site, kombucha.org. he did not see fit to respond until i called him on taking MSmoney, by allowing MSBS banner ads on his site. that's 1 thing I will NEVER do. he NEVER addressed my efforts to volunteer, months ago, ONLY my dissention last week. by the by, my efforts to illuminate/increase awareness re: the crimewave that IS MSBlight, has caused my non-profit, good4all website, to be deleted from about 1/2 of the major search engines. not very funny to me.
get real. pay attention. you can down a few servers, flame all you want. you NEED to promote/protect on a LARGE scale, as your naysayers/"leaders" do. you just need to be able to do it for less money. how many.coms do you think pudbillygates has? does it matter? yes!! 1 word can say A LOT. 1 of my favorites is msbs.org, not that i'll ever use it. HA HA HA.
contact us, we want to help, we need help. harryjo@imcnet.net (and @300 other places)
as the "king" inferred, "selling".coms IS a misnomer.
obviously,.comming would be MOSTLY about developing a VARIETY of COMMERCIAL web endeavors.
however, the reasons to do so are just as varied.
what MOST of y'all are missing, i suspect through pre-commercial web etiquette, or something, is that you're GIVING away the farm.
which is not to say that that's a bad thing, except, there's gottis out here (you didn't know) who would take the farm.
MANY MANY of the.coms,.orgs etc... that we have, we cannot ethically, or morally, "sell", to just anybody (although we've certainly been tempted). and MANY of our.coms, ARE NOT available for "sale". it is a huge responsibility.
MANY of the domains we have registered/paid for, are intended to promote/protect, things far beyond the value system of the currently burgeoning IPO generation. which is not to say getting money is bad.
I have offered FREE.com space to MANY so called promoters of the EXTREMELY valid concepts of open-source, and/or the miracle to modern technology that linux is, only to be shunned and disdained, as some bearer of subterfuge. the 1's who have have expressed interest, i find to be honest, open, and insightful (as advertised). we have also been approached/punished by some who are interested in only the greedmonger aspects of the web. it's scary.
i wrote to mr. malda several times regarding helping to stock a few of my open-source/linux related.coms/orgs with relevant content, and to promote my non-profit site, kombucha.org. he did not see fit to respond until i called him on taking MSmoney, by allowing MSBS banner ads on his site. that's 1 thing I will NEVER do. he NEVER addressed my efforts to volunteer, months ago, ONLY my dissention last week. by the by, my efforts to illuminate/increase awareness re: the crimewave that IS MSBlight, has caused my non-profit, good4all website, to be deleted from about 1/2 of the major search engines. not very funny to me.
get real. pay attention. you can down a few servers, flame all you want. you NEED to promote/protect on a LARGE scale, as your naysayers/"leaders" do. you just need to be able to do it for less money. how many.coms do you think pudbillygates has? does it matter? yes!! 1 word can say A LOT. 1 of my favorites is msbs.org, not that i'll ever use it. HA HA HA.
contact us, we want to help, we need help. harryjo@imcnet.net (and @300 other places)
having a bunch of.coms, org. etc... may be about money gouging for some.
for others, it's about protecting and extending some freedoms, and maintaining the ability to publish the truth/facts. not to mention seeing that everyman can build a webpire.
like, whose going to have a place to put REAL information, or conduct HONEST commerce, after ALL the "LEGENDARY".rags have sold out to megaslothgreedmongers.
pay attention. if acquiring numerous domain names is outlawed, mostly outlaws will control the medium.
getting the facts out is MUCH MORE important than sucking hit sites to posture for BIG SELLOUT.
sure looks like the old guard is confused/afraid about what to do re: the "new" software/business paradigm.
some evidence is the volitility in the DivertOurWealth markets.
also, quite interesting to note: when the market index drops below a certain level (usually around 100 pts.), they forums at the NYT shut down until the index "stabilizes". usually from 1-2 hrs. what a pathetic sham the bulk of the BSmediaHYPE deceitmachine is.
Slashdot Mirror
AT LEAST 1/2 of the posts in this thread prove out the knead for recognition of the deceptive rhetoricystic practices employed by the kingdumb of FUD. what to do about I.T. is a hole nether kwesteeon.
It would seam that j. public is at least somewhat awear of the situation, and it would also seam that he/she IS very open to alternatives available to the MS decade of deceit marketeering plan.
1 of the problems is that FUDbillygates has built an udderly incredible cash cow with the windose meganopoly. his ONLY means to protect it are: MS BS PR FUD, and sum bogus contracts (institutions, OEMs) established through the use of bribery, coercion, and FUD. it's (FUD) kNoT working like it used to, butt it still has life.
sew, I.T.s likely going to take a similarly monumental effort to get the truth about I.T. owt to the masses. appears that effort is well underway, but subject to the same pollutants that made FUDley whatever he is today. a real dali llama. i guess evolution is still happening. my impressions are that open-source is going to knead some very impressive open/honest "marketing" in order to save the universe from a future of pure FUD, and that love eminates from the home desktop.
I can understand Mr. Perens' reaction, as I have suffered the same in regard to feeling the need to protect a concept.
.coms/nets/orgs, with the main goal of keeping deceptive megasloth greedmongers from getting them. I then offered their use, for advertising/information to any/all in the community for free. I figured that I would at least break even on the expenses (enormous, and growing), and serve to promote the concepts that offer an alternative to megasloth greedmonger control of all that is PC.
One defense is that we are so innundated with corpirate BS, that we can be left suspicious of every action by any1 that is connected to megaslothism.
It is clear that Mr. Perens has worked VERY hard (understatement) to promote/protect the concepts of o-s. He should be able to feel proud of his efforts, and not be judged per incident. same goes for Mr. Stallman, & Mr. Raymond. Obviously, peoples' emotions/personalities, are exposed in their efforts to work towards goals. look at FUDbilLIEgates.
Experience that evokes my empathy:
Last year, sensing the rise in (commercial) popularity of linux/o-s/gnu, and the corresponding onslaught of MS BS PR trashing, of the concepts/community, I felt inspired to do some protectionary things.
I registered a whole bunch of linux/o-s related
Well, the results were/are less than stunning. However, i have managed to retain control of a whole bunch of urls, and HAVE NOT succumbed to the sizable offers of fortune from the deceptive marketeer community.
Anyway, the moral to the story, to me, is: all form of GOOD intention can be misconstrued, when negative judgement is applied, based on suspicious reaction due to preconceived notions, that are inaccurate.
doesn't mean I'm going to start trusting in the kingdumb of fud.
We haven't changed a bit in what we are attempting to accomplish, which is promotion of the concepts of gnu/linux/o-s. any positive input is appreciated. we've already heard ALL the reasons why knot.
I too worked for a decade developing database information systems for hospitals, clinics, etc...
What a quagmirish mess. In a typical larger facility, there would be dozens of seperate unconnected databases per patient. healthcare's recent answer to this, has been the development of data repositories (connecting the disparage of inf.), followed by efforts to merge reports from the relevant inf..
In my estimation, the medical/healthcare system would be served by coming to a standard interview format/health status screening, for this to happen, the medical/healthcare profession would need to approach the o-s community with the intention of same.
The result could be, a uniform patient assessment across an almost insolvent industry. part of the reason for the near insolvency, is the inability of the players to be able to agree on ANYTHING (therefore, scattering their info$ to the WINd), even though they ALL strive to obtain the same information.
The next part, that is also a shambles, is the notion of providing patients with a minimum amount of privacy concerning their medical records. recently, uncle s(h)am, at the behest of mr/ms megasloth, granted "business" a pretty much free access pass to the medical records of almost anybody who does "business" with a bank. can marketeers of everything else be far behind?
Since the net became a thing, I have found patient databases sitting on ftp sites, which speaks to the lax attitude of practitioners, as well as the lack of knowledge of webmasters re: the importance of keeping such records private.
We would be interested in discussion re: this situation with any/all interested, as it does not get any attention, in comparison to the gravity of the situation.
If a useable solution to the mess were to be developed, it would by it's very nature, be open-source.
harryjo@imcnet.net
I must be missing some things. FUDbillygates is willing to become so tactical as to risk the possibility of ending up sharing a cell with john gotti, to widose the browser "market". but no 1 in the o-s community can whip together a gui browser to meet/debunk the onslaught of FUDulistic invasionofprivacy virusfriendly blight that IEaaaggghhh is?
seems important enough to me. does look like noescape is dropping the ball, through little fault of theirs, i'd say. maybe it's kNoT important, even though it seams that the gui based www is expecting to run most, if not all their apps, in a browser. is it that difficult?
seems like, with the recently acquired billyuns of several o-s? companies? that might be a priority?
letting billygates coupdeville this, seems like surrendering after you've won.
flaime on.
That's THE MOST hysterical POSTERior i've ever red.
reminds me of the time i spoke out on a NYT forum about what i consider to be the crimewave of disinformation and gottiesque control of the PC/software industry that is exhibited by FUDbillygates.
soon (within a couple of months) 1 of my non-profit websites started disappearing from several of the "major" search engines. first, from MSNasty.con, which was okeydokey by me, butt then from hotbot etc.., where it had been the #1 answer for searches on the topic for over a year. the site is still the #1 visited for its topic (small audience) on the web. butt there is an immoral to the story.
eventually (hopefully), these types of deception will be resolved, butt knot b4 millions more folks are MiSled.
plays well into the M$=BSmediaHYPE theory. the old guard IS rattled.
hay FUDbillygates, can you tell us how many professional rhetoricyst talknicians you have working the web, filling up public forums & such with volumes of MSBS, not counting the # of "journalists" in your employ, & how much all that costs your customers/victims/stock holders?
Is all that lying really helpful to anyone?
Is there any study underway to assess the cost of lost time/productivity due to the shoddily engineered MSbugware, and/or the pathetic vulnerability of same to all form of virulent code.
Do you really think it's too late for you to get honest with the world? i do.
I'm still a little miffed with you for deleting my non-profit website from all those search engines, as you may have noticed. see you in the funny papers.
I've written several times before. first to moderate flameage, then to 0 response. what i'm saying makes sense. 41thing, penguin needs a slightly more friendly gui user interface. developers (IBM) are writing ok stuff. too bad it takes out part of your system if you reject it. if stuff using the tools already available in most distributions were maid easier, there would be less need for use of overkill systems to manage small jobe. i don't know, it seems as though it was easier to make a small biz dbase system using lotus, or even foxpro.
.coms/.orgs to be used. we have heard from many re: advertising stuff, butt we feel it's less than high value. please do feel free to contact us re: use of linux/o-s related .coms, as they require genuinely long term value offerings/availabilities.
.coms that SHOULD NOT be absorbed by the borg. we have linus-torvalds.org. what are we supposed to do with that? thegreatestgood.org is earmarked 4sum nones in WI (Sisters of the Dominican Mother House). knot that thaid no watt 2 doo. they WILL when i'm dumb. i'll write to them tomorrow.
the off-topic part is: we still have several 10's of linux/o-s related
It sure looks like the OS is free now. so is the interface for dummys. give us some colabradornation at linuxville.com.
we've got some other nifty
flame on.
hareball
must be working, 'cause how else could some nobody like myself, communicate (albeit ineffectively) with so many, for almost free. congratulations net.
i have no problem with lairy & bob being billionaires, they work hard.
.coms/orgs up to let the WORLD know what the penguin can do for business, with free? ads from at least 10,000 of y'all.
.coms/orgs intended (from the start) for use by the o-s/linux community (no bosses) to spread the message, and draw in the functional PC starved public.
.com is already paid for, it can be used for any good idea, if it isn't paid for yet, cough up a few bucks and become a co-conspirator. i say, flood the net with honest to business penguin/o-s power. we've had the opportunity to sell some to megasloths, but have been able to avoid having to do so. we registered them with the intention of preventing megsloth greedmongers (you know who they are) from getting them. and maybe for collecting some advertising income. many of them are not paid for yet, but we are working to pay for all. if we weren't shoestringing, they'd be free4all forever. save the penguin from being cornered, and get work for yourself. i'm sure y'all have some great ideas, i know i do. can't do it without you.
problem is, what about the several million folks who are responsible for the vehicle they used to be vaulted to their high station?
me, i'm just a fool, whose tired as hell of seeing a handful of megasloths, or any minority, profiting excessively from the efforts of the majority.
i'm also tired of beggin y'all to look past the BS, and get with the program.
by now, there SHOULD be 100's of linux/opensource
instead, there's 5-10, that are news, and 5-20 that offer pretty much proprietary products for sale.
we (that's me) STILL have around 100 o-s/linux related
there are some really cool commercial names in the lot, and some were gotten solely with the intent of promoting community. anyway, they are pretty much unused, other than a penguin picture, and/or ads for stuff we do that doesn't need to be there.
i was led to think that some of y'all's "leaders" were going to help me with disposition. butt it looks like their agendas DO NOT include empowering majorities.
my motives are about seeing that there's more than a few powers near the top. should be more like 1000's. perhaps arranged geographically. some of us have already lived through 1 dictatorship, NEVER again.
if you wait for commerce to trickle down to y'all from bob & lairy, your potential for world domination (in the most generous sense) will evaporate. don't you think pudbillygates is also going to cash in on/co-opt the penguin? gawd, geezeus, y'all seem so anti-inertial.
if you have interest, please contact us, harryjo@imcnet.net. as i've said before, and probably will keep trying to say, we want to help, we need YOUR help.
sorry for any excessive emotional attachment. i'm sick & tired of seeing joe public, or joe penguin, or any joe, getting the sh*t end of the stick.
if the
go ahead, just shoot me. i'm definitely inferno bait.
harryjo@imcnet.net
pudbillygates is the john gotti of the digital era. so what? his own MSBS PR/marketing depts. seem to be doing a bang up job of diminishing his influence.
.coms, when you've got linux?" can't say he's all wrong there, but try to follow the thread.
what should be even more alarming to y'all, is the megasloth attempts to monotize the penguin. again, i have no problem with folks making money, but for a handful (chosen by who?), to profit excessively (with a capitalistic E), is way too much like the same old shit.
read (past tense) a couple quotes from VAlairy Allgutsteen this week. he says, and i quote: "who needs
next, he says: "there's only room enough in the market for 4-5 major linux distributions."
this is where y'all can torch me some more, butt i think this type of HYPEnosis is Krap. whois gonna be major? i'm guessing lairy is right up there. that only leaves room for who few?
sounds way too close to the flippers turning into claws syndrome to me. at least don't try to tell me it never happens. i KNOW better.
y'all need to pay close attention. makes what Mr. Stallman says, sound like A LOT of sense, again.
as i've stated before, we have A LOT of o-s/linux related web resources, and we're thinking there ought to be MANY major FREE distributions and/or, cheap PC sites.
letting the penguin be cornered, could prove disasterous to the majority, in the long haul. not to mention the potential for scandalizing the penguin's thus far high integrity rating. i'm guessing the penguin's got some long coattails, unless they're cropped by "business" interests.
go ahead, just shoot me.
no, i'm just saying it did not work for me. y'all are absolutely positive that there is no politiking going on in the race for the billions, right? i have 0 favorite in the race. my spelling is atroseeus, so what.
why would a pkg. (oh excuse me DISTRO) be product of the year, if it doesn't work?
netscape came with the SuSE pkg.. sorry if my terminology isn't up to snuff.
there was no support, other than e-mail, that was not answered.
y'all is mighty touchy. i'm about as groan as i want to be. i expressed an experience, and an opinion, pardon me all to haites.
fixed race?
being a novite, i bought mandrake pkg.. wouldn't even boot kernel on my PC after install. ntm frigging up my old dos files.
then, i bought SuSE pkg.. works fine. netscape for kde being the lamest app incl., as ALL others work WELL.
far as i'm concerned, mr drake owes me 25$.
undoubtedly, A LOT of wallstreetofdeceit polticking to be experienced fromnowon. read about VAlarry's claims to be bigger than the net now. oh well.
yeah, right. this guy is the anti-fact as a rule. maybe his MSBSrhetoricyst talknician check is late.
In a time pronounced by the BSmediaHYPE machine as the height of economic prosperity, we will stand by as our REAL accomplishments are declared irrelevant so megaslothgreedmongers can avoid paying taxes on their ill-gotten gains.
also noteworthy, recent legislation (already passed in NY) makes it ok for banks to peruse your medical records to determine your bankworthiness. another crime against us all, in order to feed the machine.
It's EASY to blame, WE are responsible. WE have put our well being in the hands of megamaniacal greedmongers. WE appear to be too busy running for our options, to even complain as our rights are discarded.
there WILL be reprocussions. fortunately, some dogooders are STILL able to influence the tide of the infowars.
y'all STILL don't get it. do you think nsi sqeezing the low budget netrepreneur out is going to allow joe/josephine blow to get the "right" .com for his/her purposes.
.com f'in idiot (Score:1) .coms IS a misnomer.
.comming would be MOSTLY about developing a VARIETY of COMMERCIAL web endeavors.
.coms, .orgs etc... that we have, we cannot ethically, or morally, "sell", to just anybody (although we've .coms, ARE NOT available for "sale". it is a huge responsibility.
.com space to MANY so called promoters of the EXTREMELY valid concepts of open-source, and/or the
.coms/orgs with relevant content,
.coms do you think pudbillygates has? does it
wrong, it just allows megaslothgreedmongersmongers more ability to monopolize. maybe you would just as soon see pudbillygates felonious farce lighting up most of the urls on the web. some are amiable to greed up to just such a happenstance. get real. pay attention. that doesn't cost much.
i'm reposting my comments from previous negative article re: "domain hogs", 'cause it's important to TRY to get the WHOLE picture.
i'm harry brown, the
by harenet on Sunday July 11, @06:42AM EDT (#216)
(User Info)
as the "king" inferred, "selling"
obviously,
however, the reasons to do so are just as varied.
what MOST of y'all are missing, i suspect through pre-commercial web etiquette, or something, is that you're GIVING away the
farm.
which is not to say that that's a bad thing, except, there's gottis out here (you didn't know) who would take the farm.
MANY MANY of the
certainly been tempted). and MANY of our
MANY of the domains we have registered/paid for, are intended to promote/protect, things far beyond the value system of the
currently burgeoning IPO generation. which is not to say getting money is bad.
I have offered FREE
miracle to modern technology that linux is, only to be shunned and disdained, as some bearer of subterfuge. the 1's who have have
expressed interest, i find to be honest, open, and insightful (as advertised). we have also been approached/punished by some who are
interested in only the greedmonger aspects of the web. it's scary.
i wrote to mr. malda several times regarding helping to stock a few of my open-source/linux related
and to promote my non-profit site, kombucha.org. he did not see fit to respond until i called him on taking MSmoney, by allowing
MSBS banner ads on his site. that's 1 thing I will NEVER do. he NEVER addressed my efforts to volunteer, months ago, ONLY my
dissention last week. by the by, my efforts to illuminate/increase awareness re: the crimewave that IS MSBlight, has caused my
non-profit, good4all website, to be deleted from about 1/2 of the major search engines. not very funny to me.
get real. pay attention. you can down a few servers, flame all you want. you NEED to promote/protect on a LARGE scale, as your
naysayers/"leaders" do. you just need to be able to do it for less money. how many
matter? yes!! 1 word can say A LOT. 1 of my favorites is msbs.org, not that i'll ever use it. HA HA HA.
contact us, we want to help, we need help.
harryjo@imcnet.net (and @300 other places)
as the "king" inferred, "selling" .coms IS a misnomer.
.comming would be MOSTLY about developing a VARIETY of COMMERCIAL web endeavors.
.coms, .orgs etc... that we have, we cannot ethically, or morally, "sell", to just anybody (although we've certainly been tempted). and MANY of our .coms, ARE NOT available for "sale". it is a huge responsibility.
.com space to MANY so called promoters of the EXTREMELY valid concepts of open-source, and/or the miracle to modern technology that linux is, only to be shunned and disdained, as some bearer of subterfuge. the 1's who have have expressed interest, i find to be honest, open, and insightful (as advertised). we have also been approached/punished by some who are interested in only the greedmonger aspects of the web. it's scary.
.coms/orgs with relevant content, and to promote my non-profit site, kombucha.org. he did not see fit to respond until i called him on taking MSmoney, by allowing MSBS banner ads on his site. that's 1 thing I will NEVER do. he NEVER addressed my efforts to volunteer, months ago, ONLY my dissention last week. by the by, my efforts to illuminate/increase awareness re: the crimewave that IS MSBlight, has caused my non-profit, good4all website, to be deleted from about 1/2 of the major search engines. not very funny to me.
.coms do you think pudbillygates has? does it matter? yes!! 1 word can say A LOT. 1 of my favorites is msbs.org, not that i'll ever use it. HA HA HA.
obviously,
however, the reasons to do so are just as varied.
what MOST of y'all are missing, i suspect through pre-commercial web etiquette, or something, is that you're GIVING away the farm.
which is not to say that that's a bad thing, except, there's gottis out here (you didn't know) who would take the farm.
MANY MANY of the
MANY of the domains we have registered/paid for, are intended to promote/protect, things far beyond the value system of the currently burgeoning IPO generation. which is not to say getting money is bad.
I have offered FREE
i wrote to mr. malda several times regarding helping to stock a few of my open-source/linux related
get real. pay attention. you can down a few servers, flame all you want. you NEED to promote/protect on a LARGE scale, as your naysayers/"leaders" do. you just need to be able to do it for less money. how many
contact us, we want to help, we need help.
harryjo@imcnet.net (and @300 other places)
restricting webspace based on narrow opinions implanted by "old" thinking, would be similar to restricting each author to writing just 1 book.
"well ernest, if you can't make a go of it with that fishing book, you may as well forget this whole author thing"
perhaps y'all are a little opinionated.
.coms, org. etc... may be about money gouging for some.
.rags have sold out to megaslothgreedmongers.
having a bunch of
for others, it's about protecting and extending some freedoms, and maintaining the ability to publish the truth/facts. not to mention seeing that everyman can build a webpire.
like, whose going to have a place to put REAL information, or conduct HONEST commerce, after ALL the "LEGENDARY"
pay attention. if acquiring numerous domain names is outlawed, mostly outlaws will control the medium.
getting the facts out is MUCH MORE important than sucking hit sites to posture for BIG SELLOUT.
sure looks like the old guard is confused/afraid about what to do re: the "new" software/business paradigm.
some evidence is the volitility in the DivertOurWealth markets.
also, quite interesting to note: when the market index drops below a certain level (usually around 100 pts.), they forums at the NYT shut down until the index "stabilizes". usually from 1-2 hrs. what a pathetic sham the bulk of the BSmediaHYPE deceitmachine is.