It seemed to me, as a Trillian user, as if it wasn't that AOL was trying to break trillian as much as Trillan broke when AOL applied their security patch about gaming...and it was just the Secure IM part of Trillian.71+ that was breaking;
the.70 and lower versions never broke.
Seems to me either AOL wasn't trying very hard, or it was all just coincidence.
I sent myself a shipment cross country once. The first bad thing was that UPS dropped it off without even knocking on the door. One of the boxes seemed strange...it had my shipping label, but it wasn't the box I sent. What I shipped was mostly clothing, with an small inner box that had some CD's. What I received was some of my clothing, along with some other persons oil stained work clothes, gloves, and an employee of the month plaque from the Worchester, MA shipping hub. Luckily, I insured it, and after a month or two of wrangling (the plaque was a pretty hard piece of evidence to deny) I did get some money.
Slashdot Mirror
It seemed to me, as a Trillian user, as if it wasn't that AOL was trying to break trillian as much as Trillan broke when AOL applied their security patch about gaming...and it was just the Secure IM part of Trillian .71+ that was breaking;
.70 and lower versions never broke.
the
Seems to me either AOL wasn't trying very hard, or it was all just coincidence.
I sent myself a shipment cross country once. The first bad thing was that UPS dropped it off without even knocking on the door. One of the boxes seemed strange...it had my shipping label, but it wasn't the box I sent. What I shipped was mostly clothing, with an small inner box that had some CD's. What I received was some of my clothing, along with some other persons oil stained work clothes, gloves, and an employee of the month plaque from the Worchester, MA shipping hub. Luckily, I insured it, and after a month or two of wrangling (the plaque was a pretty hard piece of evidence to deny) I did get some money.