It's been chistened with that wonderfully ugly name because it's a processor they'd rather not have to produce.
I bet the Engineers hate their x86-64 assignments too, miserably following someone else's spec, the same way AMD did, maybe 10 years ago in their 286/386 days.
...dressed in Linux. Anyone with the displeasure of having worked with PC-Chips motherboards cringe at the thought of a PC-Chips PDA. Palm Computing legal is gonna take a fit unless LinuxDA's version isn't PalmOS flashable/hackable . This URL to The Register has the relevant links http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/20102.html
I'll bet Palm Computing's Legal team will go after this one. It's a PC-Chips _hardware_ clone of a PalmIII. Flashable too. The pictures seem to imply this device is what the LinuxDA actually is..
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/20102.html
Slashdot Mirror
It's been chistened with that wonderfully ugly name because it's a processor they'd rather not have to produce.
I bet the Engineers hate their x86-64 assignments too, miserably following someone else's spec, the same way AMD did, maybe 10 years ago in their 286/386 days.
...dressed in Linux. Anyone with the displeasure of having worked with PC-Chips motherboards cringe at the thought of a PC-Chips PDA. Palm Computing legal is gonna take a fit unless LinuxDA's version isn't PalmOS flashable/hackable . This URL to The Register has the relevant links http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/20102.html
I'll bet Palm Computing's Legal team will go after this one. It's a PC-Chips _hardware_ clone of a PalmIII. Flashable too. The pictures seem to imply this device is what the LinuxDA actually is.. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/20102.html