Slashdot Mirror


First Looks at Linux DA PDA

e1en0r writes "My Linux DA PDA finally arrived yesterday. It's a great PDA for under $100. I put up a review of it here. It's very similar to the Palm OS, with a few more interesting features. The most notable being the file manager. You can see where everything is and view all the files in text and hexadecimal mode. It also appears that you can overclock the 16 MHz DragonBall CPU up to 25 MHz. There are some screenshots on their site, which include the CPU Speed application. Unfortunately that application is lacking in documentation." The review is a little thin, but its still cool seeing these in the wild.

160 comments

  1. Someone had to do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Palm IIIxe Hardware Compatible
    2 MB Flash Upgradeable
    8 MB RAM
    Motorola Dragonball CPU
    Battery Operated
    Color Available - GALAXY GREY
    15 Days Technical Support by Email
    6 Month Linux DA O/S Software Upgrade
    One Year Warranty
    DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform
    Includes: Carrying Case, 2 AAA Batteries, PC Sync Cable, CD with PC Sync Program, Quick-Start Manual, Handwriting Guide, Warranty Card, Registration Card

    1. Re:Someone had to do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cancelled my order when my Visa card was
      charged long before the devices were available
      to ship. Had I received something that could not
      be used in a Microsoft-free environment, that
      alone would be reason enough to return the junk.

      Is it true the marketing wizards at linuxda are
      planning to release a a stripped down version of
      Win CE that only syncs up with Linux 0.98 or earlier platforms?

  2. Irony: by Cheetah86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The irony here is while it promotes linux as a pda system, the datasync feature is available for windows only right now.

    1. Re:Irony: by irony+nazi · · Score: 1
      Please allow the irony nazi to correct the above post:

      It is not irony in the correct sense of the word since rsync is available to sync the Linux PDA with any *nix system.

      Nice try, however. Better luck in the future.

      --

      Bringing irony to the Slash-masses
    2. Re:Irony: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony Nazi! Just what Slashdot needs! You're my new hero.

    3. Re:Irony: by Corrado · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't even work! How sad is that?

      --
      KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    4. Re:Irony: by jonnystiph · · Score: 1
      The irony here is while it promotes linux as a pda system, the datasync feature is available for windows only right now.

      All of the Linux PDA's I have seen have only synced with winblows. This is very irritating. News flash for marketers. If people are buying a linux PDA (generally) they use linux, other wise most people would just use Palm. When someone gets there head out of thier arse and writes software that syncs thier linux PDA with...gasp...Linux, then I will buy one.

      Until then, it just seems to be fueling the stupidity of bad marketing.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  3. I'll buy one. by tcd004 · · Score: 1

    The palm m505 is so hopelessly overpriced that these things have to potential to sell well. I've been a plam user from the start but I'm looking for an alternative. Let's just hope the usual open source tilt towards completely ignoring any kind of marketing doesn't haunt DA.

    Shameless plugs:
    I hope it doesn't put off any harmful radiation like the pentium 4.

    tcd004

  4. DA/Linux isnt' a real (free) Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    although the OS of this PDA might be linux-based,
    the following line on their site:
    "6 Month Linux DA O/S Software Upgrade"
    shows that it lacks the main feature of linux, which
    is to be downloadable and free (beer&speech)

  5. I don't get it. by Karpe · · Score: 2

    The product page says " 6 Month Linux DA O/S Software Upgrade", but if it's based on free software, I should always be able to download the latest source and install on the handheld, at least for the kernel, which is obviously GPLd.

    1. Re:I don't get it. by GiMP · · Score: 2

      The gpl doesn't say you must be able to install it on the handheld.. although, they must provide source.. at least per-request.

    2. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're right, you don't get it. The GPL just says you're entitled to the source code of products you already have a binary for. If they don't give you a new binary after 6 months, tough cookies.

      Now the GPL also says that they can't keep anyone else from giving you the binary. But my guess is just the kernel is GPLed (since they have no way around this) but the actual PIM applets are proprietary, so nobody could give you anything besides an updated kernel, which probably wouldn't do you much good.

    3. Re:I don't get it. by Karpe · · Score: 2

      They provide it for the kernel, here, but they should always provide it. Not only for 6 months.

    4. Re:I don't get it. by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hey moderators, mod parent up. The AC said what I was gonna say.

    5. Re:I don't get it. by treke · · Score: 2

      They dont have to provide you perpetual upgrades. They only have to give you the Source for the version of the software they distributed. Any free upgrades are soley up to the discrestion of the distributor

    6. Re:I don't get it. by Karpe · · Score: 2

      Exactly. As long as they are distributing a new version, they should make the source available. If we reach the cold end of the universe, they do not need to provide further upgrades ;)

    7. Re:I don't get it. by GiMP · · Score: 2

      well, nothing lasts forever.. Many GPL'ed projects disappear completely.. the author disappears and nobody ever downloads or mirrors the project.. BTW, The gpl never says HOW the source should be made available.. just that it is. Many projects only have source available on CDROM.

    8. Re:I don't get it. by Sancho · · Score: 2

      I thought the GPL said that you had to deliver the source on the same type of medium as the binary is available?

      Sancho

    9. Re:I don't get it. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I thought the GPL said that you had to deliver the source on the same type of medium as the binary is available?

      Nope. Just "on a medium customarily used for software interchange".

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    10. Re:I don't get it. by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      No, machine readable. They could distribute it on punch cards if they wanted to.

      -- iCEBaLM

    11. Re:I don't get it. by treke · · Score: 2

      But they dont have to provide them to you. They just have to give you the source for the version of the software you were given. If they give you a newer binary though, they have to offer you that source also, but you have no right to the newer binaries under the GPL.

  6. Linux at the wrong end! by ghostlibrary · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Alas, this PDA makes the same mistake as all the others. From the sales page:

    "DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform"

    It'd be nice to have a PDA running Linux, but if it can't talk to my other computers, it's pointless.

    Rats.

    --
    A.
    1. Re:Linux at the wrong end! by crimoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pointless to you (as a Linux user), yes. Pointless to them (as a company), no way. One of the great things about Linux (and Open Source in general) is that everyone now has this awesome repository of code that they can pull from. No longer do people need to start at ground zero in their development cycle, rather they can plunk in code from the Open Source community and get a real jump start.

      Now, to get Linux "at the right end" companies just need to be convinced that there is a large enough paying population to justify putting out a product. My bet would be that this is less likely to happen. Even if a company put out a great product that ran on Linux it would likely be cloned, forked, warez or simply not purchased. Typical Linux users don't want to pay for code; if its not Free (as in beer) they don't want it. Now there are some that will plunk down some $$ for a project they like or an application that they need, but overall there is no large market for commercial Linux desktop applications.

    2. Re:Linux at the wrong end! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only people who will be brave/stupid enough to buy one of these machines (at least initially) will be Linux users. I see no reason why anyone who is a windows user only would buy this instead of a similarily (or cheaper) priced Palm.


      Really, aside from the nerd/Linux market, they don't have much of a chance in hell of succeeding. This makes their lack of Linux software on the client side pretty bad. For example, I wont be getting one. And I was waiting for it...

    3. Re:Linux at the wrong end! by bee-yotch · · Score: 1

      yeah, but in this case they aren't trying to sell software. they're trying to sell PDA's. You can't 'warez' a PDA. If it was easy to use with a linux system i can assure you that they would sell at least one more PDA.

  7. Funny.. by Malbosia · · Score: 0
    DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform

    Does anyone else find this funny?

  8. from the review ... he'd recommend it if it worked by evil_roy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like a Palm , only chunkier.

    It runs very little software and won't sync.

    A linux PDA that doesn't even attempt to sync with anything other than Windows and then fails anyway ?

    Seems like a pointless device. Why try to emulate a palm anyway ? If you're going to take them on try to be BETTER.

    Seems like a joke device. I wonder if the reviewer would be favourable at all if it wasn't a linux based device ?

  9. Screenshots by spellcheckur · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A nice, inexpensive piece of equipment running an OS that looks like PalmOS but doesn't actually run Palm apps...

    I'm a big fan of Linux, but why would I want this instead of kicking a few bucks extra and actually getting a Palm device?

    I'm serious here; my Visor does what I want it to, does this solve some problem that existing PDAs don't? It seems like sort of a tough sell, especially when the device has only 15 apps.

    1. Re:Screenshots by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Not only that. But when is tries to look slightly differnt, so they don't look exactly like palmOS. They do a bad job.
      Go to the screenshots page, and look at all the wasted space on the display. Unessesary borders/icons, colums not set out to the full width of the screen etc.
      These may seem like weak points. But not when you consider that the screen is only 160x160, it's important.

      If they had improved the interface (and belive me, there are 100's of things that could be added/fixed to out of the box PalmOS), then the fact that there aren't as many apps out at the moment, woudn't bother me so much, since half the apps installed on my Vx are extentions/enchantments anyway.

    2. Re:Screenshots by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      I'm a big fan of Linux, but why would I want this instead of kicking a few bucks extra and actually getting a Palm device?

      More? Wow, I heard on my car radio that I can get a Palm M100 for $99.99 plus tax - $CDN too. That seems cheaper than $100 US for this thing, and the Palm is far better supported.

      Besides, what do I need 8 megs of memory for? I don't know 8 megs worth of people or send 8 megs worth of e-mail.

      --Dan

    3. Re:Screenshots by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      Besides, what do I need 8 megs of memory for? I don't know 8 megs worth of people or send 8 megs worth of e-mail.

      Eight megs of applications beyond the system-standard set, eight megs of reference materials and data stores ... you'd be surprised how skimpy two (or four) megs actually are when trying to get thorough use out of palm[-like].
    4. Re:Screenshots by jwsmith00 · · Score: 1

      I got past my 2MB limit in less than 2 hours of owning my Handspring Visor Deluxe. When you get a PDA, make sure you add www.avantgo.com to your list of must-haves. Then you can sync your Handspring and read Slashdot on the road.

  10. Linux DA or Agenda VR3? by harpotheclown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which would be a better buy? The Linux DA goes for $99 and you can get an Agenda VR3 for $119 at Tigerdirect. You have to wait 6-8 weeks for the DA though. The Agenda, right now, has more applications, a faster processor (66Mhz compared to 16-25 for the DA), and more memory but support could be dwindling. As far as pure hacking pleasure goes I'm still tempted to go with the Agenda VR3. Any opinions?

    --
    Thank you, drive through.
  11. hmm does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean if i could maintain a copy i could use it on my palm IIIXe?

  12. Windohs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unfortunately the software that this comes with only works on Windohs"

    How clever.

  13. Article at LinuxDevices.com by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    Here's a related article at LinuxDevices.com. It's not a review, but it has links to more information.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  14. The Bird by rbeattie · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Is anyone using the latest Mozilla and noticed the icon in the URL flicking you the bird on elenor.net? That's a nice way to greet your readers.

    Yeah, well fu2.

    -Russ

    --
    Me
    1. Re:The Bird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, somebody call 911. His feelings are hurt.

  15. "LinuxDA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Isn't Linux a trademark by Linus Torvalds? Looks like he might have to file a lawsuit of his own there to prevent the Linux trademark from being "diluted".

  16. License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by mj6798 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The AgendaVR, Yopy, and Sharp PDAs are "Linux PDAs". This is a proprietary PDA that happens to use a Linux kernel. Other than that, you'll have an easier time writing applications using open source tools for the Palm than for this thing.

    What bugs me about this is not that some company is using the Linux kernel to build a proprietary PDA, but the fact that they so prominently use the Linux name. This is not a "Linux" PDA in any useful sense: it doesn't run Linux utilities, it thumbs its nose at the open source process, and even its kernel software development appears to take part outside the Linux community.

    I also wonder whether the company even still has the right to use the Linux kernel. They failed to make source code available for months (I requested it), even though they were distributing binaries. That was a violation of the GPL, and once you violate it, you lose the right to use the code. Also, the source code that they did finally distribute is a mess, and I have my doubts that it even corresponds to the kernel that they ship, which would constitute another GPL violation.

    1. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The AgendaVR, Yopy, and Sharp PDAs are "Linux PDAs". This is a proprietary PDA that happens to use a Linux kernel.

      So what's a non-proprietary PDA?

      This is not a "Linux" PDA in any useful sense: it doesn't run Linux utilities, it thumbs its nose at the open source process, and even its kernel software development appears to take part outside the Linux community.

      And the opposite is true of the VR3. It runs desktop-style Linux utilities, complete and Open Source is available for everything on the box, and the kernel is a relatively standard linuxvr/linuxmips kernel.

      I think the only way you could claim the VR3 is a "proprietary PDA" is that the schematics and license for the hardware are not freely available. But by that standard, the hardware you're using right now is proprietary. (OK, there are probably a few slashdot readers on homebrew/reference/open hardware right now; feel free to hit reply...)

      The VR3 isn't perfect. It has many things wrong with it. But it's the flag carrier for development of PDA systems Linux-style. Well, handhelds.org wins for repurposing the iPaq hardware, but Compaq isn't corporately dedicated to supporting Linux on that PDA.

      (Insert rant about what "Linux" really means here. Imagine I claimed that glibc+kernel was the most useful definition right now.)

    2. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LinuxDA doesn't use glibc. They use their own libc cobbled together from many different sources.

      They're still violating the GPL, tho, by distributing gcc without sources or offer to provide same, and by having a EULA on the SDK (which includes GPL'd stuff).

      Anyone notice how they're from Redmond, WA?

    3. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by mj6798 · · Score: 2
      Not having read the GPL but does it say how long a company has to release the source?

      If the binary is available for download, the source must be available for download from the same location at the same time.

      Also who knows...that source you got could actually be the kernel in your system...a mess or not..sometimes shitty code actually works.

      The GPL is pretty explicit that they need to include the source in the form they are using for making the executable. My impression is that this is not the case.

    4. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1


      I raised the GPL concern with LinuxDA earlier in the year. I was informed that until the GPL was upheld under a court challenge, they didn't think it carried much weight. Curiously, they felt they were justified in cutting the GPL corner with a statement like "how else can anyone make money with Linux?"




      God's honest truth.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    5. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by doob · · Score: 1

      If the binary is available for download, the source must be available for download from the same location at the same time.

      Isn't it a lot more general than that, it's more along the lines of "if a binary is available then source must be available", no distribution methods specified. So if they provide binaries to download they don't have to make the source available on the same site, just give it out when asked.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
    6. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by Cheese+Metal+Rulez!! · · Score: 1

      1)All the PDAs you mention are 'proprietary'.

      2)"useful sense"!?! I don't think you're a human in any useful sense in that if I were to mince you and turn you into sausages they would contain only a very low percentage of meat.
      What was your point again?

      3)This is not a violation of the GPL, try reading it sometime.
      Your doubts are worth nothing.
      You wouldn't know a GPL violation if it deflowered you.

    7. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by mj6798 · · Score: 2
      So if they provide binaries to download they don't have to make the source available on the same site, just give it out when asked.

      Well, I asked, and they didn't make it available in any form for several months.

    8. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by FallLine · · Score: 2
      Well, I asked, and they didn't make it available in any form for several months.
      Well besides the fact that I think this product and this company are destined for nothing but absolute failure, lighten up.

      Who really cares if they release it or not? Sure, it's technically part of the GPL and it's within the right of the public, but it still seems to me that some people are just out to whine. Their value added, insofar as the kernel and hardware goes, is probably almost zip (judging by what i've seen). It's the applications that they actually "did" something with, but even there.... looks downright mediocre.

      Furthermore, this company JUST released this product, did they not? According to the GPL a company is not obliged to release their sourcecode, unless they DISTRIBUTE it. In other words, if they just started distributing this past week, it's still reasonable for them to take awhile longer to reply.
    9. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by mj6798 · · Score: 2
      Furthermore, this company JUST released this product, did they not? According to the GPL a company is not obliged to release their sourcecode, unless they DISTRIBUTE it. In other words, if they just started distributing this past week, it's still reasonable for them to take awhile longer to reply.

      They released the software in binary form months ago. They refused to make the source available at the time (probably while they were trying to get licensees). Months later the source appeared on their web site. They licensed the software to a hardware manufacturer and the hardware manufacturer apparently released a hardware product recently.

    10. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      So what's a non-proprietary PDA?

      Maybe one that allows you to use non-prprietary software to interact with it?

      DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform

      I don't think these will sell very well at all.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    11. Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? by Taurine · · Score: 1

      The GPL doesn't say they have to make the source available to _everyone_ if they distribute the binary, just that they have to make it available to anyone who they supplied a binary to. If you haven't in some way acquired a binary _from_them_ they don't have to give you the source but the person you got it from does. If you don't have a binary you don't have a _right_ to the source.

  17. So it's a PalmOS Clone??? by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    With a few extra apps that noone needs?

  18. Powerplay 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually acording to an email I just got back from them.. they are actually porting the sync program over to linux. I got now timetable on this but atleast a linux verion is on its way. They also gave me two options when I expressed my disatisfaction with a windows only sync program. They said that I could either wait for the linux version or return it for a full refund. :)

  19. Rip off of Palm UI by hattig · · Score: 1
    If there ever was a rip-off of a GUI, this device has to get the award for most blatant.

    Good points: The price - this is in the price range of many people. However, would the Palm m100 be a better deal because of the wealth of applications available?

    Also, that website has a way too small font, and it is a fixed size so I couldn't scale it up in the browser (konqueror). Mozilla will probably fare better as its font resizing even works on sites there the stylesheet has been rude enough to specify a fixed font size instead of a relative font size.

    1. Re:Rip off of Palm UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever see KDE? Put it beside a Windows box and you'll fool 9 out of 10 people.

  20. ueber geek! by jazzman45 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Promotional Photo? A) Why would any self-respecting company use this photo? and B) I feel sorry for whoever this is.

    1. Re:ueber geek! by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      HEY!
      I even tried to suck my gut in!! :-)

      Well, I thought the same thing but then realized that it was a very true to life model, they had choosen. The only one who would be seen wearing a belt like this.

    2. Re:ueber geek! by Vanbo · · Score: 1

      Tips for the Fashion dead geek:

      1) Never wear white pants with a white shirt. You wear dark pants light shirt or the opposite. In otherwords, you are trying to avoid being in SPY VS SPY. (Hint: dark pants also mean dark socks!)

      2) NEVER (that means ever) do the "Batbelt" in any visable public place. One phone or pager is normal. Pager, phone, PDA, wireless email, leatherman, etc = BATMAN

      Got it? Good, now get out of the house and meet people, you can't do that in front of your computer.

      --
      VANBO
    3. Re:ueber geek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell is wrong with wearing white pants and shirt?

    4. Re:ueber geek! by Corrado · · Score: 1

      (Hint: dark pants also mean dark socks!)

      Nah, white tennis socks are good for all colors of pants. Besides, they are much more comfortable and cheaper than "dress" socks.

      --
      KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
  21. In case it gets slashdotted.. by benmhall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I ordered a Linux DA PDA on Sept. 22 and it finally arrived today (Nov 15). Their website gave me errors when trying to have it shipped to a different address than the billing address, so I had to put the shipping address in the special instructions field. Needless to say it was delivered to my old apartment. Thankfully I thought to go over there and check for it. Aside from the shipping annoyances, I really like this PDA, especially considering that it was under $100.

    It's about twice as thick as my Palm Vx and comes with batteries, a data sync cable and a pretty decent case. It looks pretty nice too. There was a lame Linux DA sticker on the case that I peeled off right away, thinking it was just protecting the logo like the cover I peeled off the screen. Heh. Oops. The packaging was nice and it arrived in one piece.

    But on to the important details - the PDA itself. I'm very happy with it. It's got a DragonBall EZ 16 MHz processor that you can apparently overclock up to 25 MHz, 8 MB RAM and 2 MB Flash Rom. The physical buttons are pretty much the same as a Palm and there's a backlight and contrast control. It comes with 7 games, 10 applications, and 4 system utilites. A lot of the features are similar to the Palm OS, but it has some cool differences. For one, you can change the keyboard to QWERTY or natural. I also like that you can choose whether or not you want small or large icons. I'm having a little trouble with the handwriting recognition because it's a little different than Palm's. One cool feature is that when you write something it pops up a box showing what you're writing.

    My favorite application is the File Manager. It's cool to see where things are, and you can view the files in text and hexadecimal mode. I'm trying to figure out if you can actually do anything with the htdocs directory. It seems strange to have it but with no purpose. I also like the paint application. It's a basic application that lets you draw crude pictures and save them, but it's so fun coloring things in. The games are your basic free games - snake, mine, tetris, etc. Plus there's the standard applications like an Address Book, Expense, Email, Memo, Schedule, Clock, etc. There are some screenshots here.

    Unfortunately the software that this comes with only works on Windohs. And it even seems to have problems with that. I'm using Win2k and I'm getting various sync connection errors (COM2 is using by the other program!, Communication error). The strange thing is when I press the sync button, the PC pops up an error and the PDA shows the sync screen but times out. So they're both recognizing the sync request but not connecting. I've tried both serial ports but have had no luck. There is a nice feature that lets me import my Palm addresses and memos. Hopefully I can actually sync them eventually.

    Overall I'd say the Palm is easier to use, but if you're looking for a cheap PDA I'd highly recommend this one, assuming that the sync utility will eventually work. It definitely holds its own against the others that I've played with. The lack of software is an issue, however. I haven't found any other applications for it. You can download their development kit, complete with core dump, and try making your own though.

    Here are the specs from the official site:

    * Manufactured by Linux DA O/S Licensee
    * Embedded with Linux DA O/S for PowerPlay III
    * Palm IIIxe Hardware Compatible
    * 2 MB Flash Upgradeable
    * 8 MB RAM
    * Motorola Dragonball CPU
    * Battery Operated
    * Color Available - GALAXY GREY
    * 15 Days Technical Support by Email
    * 6 Month Linux DA O/S Software Upgrade
    * One Year Warranty
    * DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform
    * Includes: Carrying Case, 2 AAA Batteries, PC Sync Cable, CD with PC Sync Program, Quick-Start Manual, Handwriting Guide, Warranty Card, Registration Card

    Pictures coming soon. Although the pictures on their site are accurate.

  22. Dial a phone with one? by Overcoat · · Score: 1

    There's been a lot of talk aobut how you can't use a Plam to reilably dial a phone. I've read that it was both a speaker limitation and a shortcoming of the dragonball CPU's ability to generate tones. Has anyone had any luck using a dragonball-based PDA for phone-dialing?

    1. Re:Dial a phone with one? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      My Palm device can dial just fine. IMHO, it's just too redundant to have a PDA and a separate phone.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:Dial a phone with one? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, barring a headset plugged into the pda phone, i imagine it would be annoying to have to stop talking at times so as to look something up, or write something down on the pda. Provided you can even switch out of the phone mode w/o hanging up.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:Dial a phone with one? by Phork · · Score: 1

      The reason a palm cannot produce DTMF tones is because of the speaker they use, it is a piezo. The CPU is totally capable of producing DTMF tones, there is a whole section is the data sheet for the CPU about using it to produce DTMF tones.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    4. Re:Dial a phone with one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad your phone is fucking huge!

    5. Re:Dial a phone with one? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Yes, you can plug a headset in; no, plugging it in will not disconnect a call; yes, you can be on the phone and doing stuff with the Palm-part.

      In short: Kyocera did a nice integration job.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  23. Rsync?!? by GlitchZ · · Score: 1

    1) The compnay does not ofically support rsync. It does NOT appear the the cradle is using TCP/IP for communication.

    1. Re:Rsync?!? by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

      Then set a slip connection through serial...what's the prob?

  24. other linux PDAs by glwtta · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haven't tried this thing yet, but do remember getting my paws on an Agenda a while back - it was pretty neat, especially watching it boot up - made you feel right at home. Ate batteries like it was it's job though (which I guess it kinda was)

    Anyway, I don't use PDAs since I took my Visor sailing with me - doh! (WON the sucker from Handspring too, easy come, easy go I guess)

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  25. DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Plat by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    I was about to order when I saw that. No sale.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  26. My God... by trilucid · · Score: 1, Redundant


    Even in my darkest days of true geekdom I was never this bad. :)

    I mean, I know it runs Linux, and it looks nice and all, but how much digital crud do we really want to strap on our bodies anyhow? A certain borg analogy comes to mind...

    NOTE: grep -r "humour" > your ;)

    1. Re:My God... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      In a former life, I was involved with emergency services and disaster coordination.

      I carried a cell phone (big, clunky thing - this was a while back), a walkie-talkie, a keyring with about 40 keys on it, a mag-lite, and sometimes a handcuff case. All on my belt, and not a geek-toy among the lot.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  27. but we already have handsprings by rebug · · Score: 1

    It sure seems like the only appeal of this device is that it runs linux. It adds no signifigant breadth of functionality to the handheld genre. The apps they have screenshots of look like standard (and a few substandard) palm os facilities.

    I'm not an embedded systems sort of person, so there may be something terribly cool about mushing linux down into little devices, but why not use NetBSD? NetBSD is very portable, and I'd bet my socks there's one that runs on the dragonball. Linux (as far as I know [let's be honest, that isn't very far]) was designed to run on i386, wasn't it?

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
    1. Re:but we already have handsprings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A friend of mine is an engineer with them. I asked him why use Linux vs. NetBSD (which has a more proprietary-friendly license), QNX, etc.

      Apparrently, it was a management decision from the top, and most people agree it was only used so it could get "Linux" buzz. Maybe they'll be as successful as VA Linux...

  28. Re:Irony. {part 2} by GISboy · · Score: 1

    Not to try to out irony the irony_nazi, but I think what is being said is the only way to get the PDA " 'N Sync" is to use windows.

    Misery loves mediocraty, perhaps?

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  29. Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor by crimoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if the reviewer would be favourable at all if it wasn't a linux based device

    Nope. The product wouldn't even get to market. Inferrior products don't go anywhere unless they've got some reason to survive. In this case the company hopes that Linux users will buy it (over Palm, etc.) simply because it runs Linux, not because it has better features.

  30. Weird Webpage by ajuda · · Score: 1

    I did a view source on their webpage...
    <meta name="generator" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">

    I find it interesting that a company that thinks it is important enough to put linux on a PDA still can't make a web page without Frontpage for Microsoft Windows...

    1. Re:Weird Webpage by trilucid · · Score: 2

      I think it's time we revisit the key details surrounding this story:

      • It runs Linux, but only syncs with Windows.
      • Their site is made with FrontPage, version 4.0 no less. Ewww.
      • That dude taking up half his waist with yon 15-app-cap device just isn't cool.

      It would seem this is actually a convoluted plot to reduce consumer faith in the Linux family of operating systems in favor of Borg alternatives. The viscious Microsoft PR machine has struck again! :)

  31. Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

    That it's cheap is about the only reason I can see to get this thing. I'll stick with my Palm.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  32. erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it uses linux guts instead of palm os guts!"

    Wow. Is there _any_ benefit to these things?

    I mean sure, linux on the pc instead of windows, it gives you unix stuff - but when your are abstracting the kernel so far from the user by placing a super-friendly pda interface in top of it, who cares what the kernel is?

    1. Re:erm by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      hehe,

      macosx follows the same strategy and is generally considered ubercool...

      meneer de koekepeer

    2. Re:erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree, tardface.

      OS X is useful. I can run IE, Word, and tcsh right next to each other, and it's all sitting on top of a BSD system that I know and trust.

      Nothing else provides this feature set.

      This linux pda turd doesn't provide anything you can't get from every other pda on earth. It just uses the word "linux" to gain the attention of the dweebs that sit on web sites like slashtrash all day.

  33. host os by DigitalGlass · · Score: 1

    A linux handheld that can only be synced on windows.... well.. so far.

    1. Re:host os by mselmeci · · Score: 1

      I've heard this complaint a number of times, and I just want to ask: What other PDAs can be synced on Linux? I know the Palm can, and the Visor (if you buy the seperate serial cable), but can you sync the iPaq or the Yopy?

    2. Re:host os by Squash · · Score: 1

      My wife has an Agenda VR3, and it comes with Linux sync software. However, it is crap. Fortunately, there is ADesktop which is a *much* better alternative.

      However, battery life on this unit is absolutely horrible.

      --
      Squash
    3. Re:host os by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

      My Visor sync's just fine with the included USB connection. I have an older HP Jornada 680 that has limited sync ability (files only) using plain old PPP over serial and SAMBA. Presumptively, if you are running Linux on your iPaq (and you should, it's tres cool) then rsync would be your friend. Yopy doesn't really exist outside of a developer version, and if you're a developer, write your own damn sync software.

    4. Re:host os by DigitalGlass · · Score: 1

      well, since the ipaq runs a microsoft os by default, i would bet that no one will be taking the time to port it to linux. On the other hand, handhelds that run the palm OS *seem* to be more widley used by the linux community than a handheld powered by MS, so I would expect that demanding for linux syncing software would be higher.

  34. Can you make it a real palm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Palm offering the Palm OS 4.1 upgrade for $29.95. I've been thinking about buying one of these and just flashing it with the latest palm os. I'm a fan of the old Palm III form factor.

    I was wondering also is it compatiable with Palm III accessories. If so this might be a decent way for people with a big investment in old style palm accessories to be able to get a new pda.

    Any thoughts.

  35. Get real by FallLine · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The palm m505 is so hopelessly overpriced that these things have to potential to sell well. I've been a plam user from the start but I'm looking for an alternative. Let's just hope the usual open source tilt towards completely ignoring any kind of marketing doesn't haunt DA.
    Yes, the Palm m505 is expensive. However, you're comparing Apples and Oranges. You can buy a PalmIIIxe or Palm105 for less than 150 and these are very much equivelanet to what this Linux DA company is offering. What's more, these come with very well designed software products for both the Handheld, PC, and the Conduit (the layer that syncs). Not to mention a zillion 3rd party software applications and hardware addons.

    This is just the current state too. We know that Palm is doing all this in an economically viable way, whereas Linux DA may not be and probably is not. In other words, with Palm the continued support and development is pretty much a sure thing...Linux DA on the other hand.....will likely be forced to fold very shortly.
  36. Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nice, inexpensive piece of equipment running an OS that looks like PalmOS but doesn't actually run Palm apps...
    I'm a big fan of Linux, but why would I want this instead of kicking a few bucks extra and actually getting a Palm device?

    I'm serious here; my Visor does what I want it to, does this solve some problem that existing PDAs don't? It seems like sort of a tough sell, especially when the device has only 15 apps.

  37. The only available color is... by CyberDruid · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Galaxy grey"!? Since when are galaxies grey? I suppose if you are the sort of guy that wears PDAs and mobile phones in their belt (a bit of the galaxy-coloring is visible around the buttons), things like fashion and colors tend to become a blur.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  38. Not very useful, not even very linux by not_cub · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Hopefully this will get modded down as redundant as hundreds of people read the link. (Or not). From the article:

    DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform

    Um, so this "linux pda" requires me to use windows on my real machine. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of having linux on a pda in the first place (ie cater to us geeks on slashdot)? What is the company thinking to release a product with such a benefit-destroying feature. Reminds me of a dilbert strip where Dilbert is asked to add a standby light to a battery operated product.


    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
  39. Looks like a piece of junk.... by starslab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't say i'm terribly impressed with this thing. Only syncs with Windows, no third-party apps (that'll be fixed in time), and even the Windows sync program is broken.

    Not to mention, Palm could probably sue them for ripping off their UI... Other than that the fonts are ugly as fuck and not positioned onscreen properly, it looks exactly like PalmOS.

    The one thing i'm curious about though : They claim "Hardware compatibility with Palm IIIxe". Does that mean I could buy one of these devices, get a ROM image of PalmOS 3.5 somewhere and throw it onto this $100 handheld? (Slightly illegal, I know, but I'm just wondering if it's possible)

    1. Re:Looks like a piece of junk.... by Cow4263 · · Score: 1

      If I had to guess, I'd say that they are refering to the numberous accessories and stuff already made for the IIIxe. Just a guess though

    2. Re:Looks like a piece of junk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no, the expansion/sync port on it is the only non-palm compatable hardware on it :P

  40. Mmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am at this moment, alone in my dark, dark room, the only light coming from the monitor screen, I am leaning back in my ergonometric leather chair that I bought at a dot com garage sale for $2.98, and now, my friends, I am imagining a beowulf cluster of these.

  41. Hrm... just think of it... by ppetru · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, there's a new PDA out! Let's hack it and put Linux on it!

    ... oh, wait, it already runs Linux. Move on geeks, nothing to hack here :)

    --

    Petru
  42. Why bother with a Linux PDA? by Felinoid · · Score: 1, Troll

    Making Linux run on a PDA was pritty cool.
    It showed how flexable Linux really is AND has the additional benifit of producing improved code for the desktop/server Linux code.

    It says if needed an imbeded Linux CAN exist. Linux CAN be stuffed ANYPLACE.

    I like my Visor Neo...
    Can I get a wireless modem for the Linux PDA? Unlikely... But I can plug a wireless into my Neo..
    Mom has a wireless built in her Palm IIV

    Can I get a camra for the Linux PDA?
    Unlikely... But I can plug one into my Neo
    Mom has a Kodak she uses on hers...

    How about a GPS? Yeah just about every PDA ever made has a GPS. The ill fated Zoomer had a GPS.. My Neo.. moms Palm... but this? Unlikely..

    This comes off like a toy.. and hurts the Linux credability...

    I'll stick with my Visor thank you..

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  43. For a few bucks more, consider a mono iPaq... by Fourier · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had my eye on the iPaq H3135. 200MHz StrongARM, 16MB RAM + 16MB ROM. Those specs put the VR3 to shame, and handhelds.org should have all the info on flashing the OS to Linux. Amazon.com is offering them for $150 after rebate.

    Note: the status of Linux on the mono iPaq seems to be a little behind the color version, so be sure to check the relevant info on the development site before jumping on the idea.

    1. Re:For a few bucks more, consider a mono iPaq... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      I just purchased a H3150 + CF sleeve (same as the H3135) off of eBay for $165. Saw that Amazon deal, but it's been out of stock for a while- should've waited a little longer! Seems like a great deal- especially compared to the color models. I'm working on spe.sf.net - not sure if I'll run it on top of WinCE or Linux. Really doesn't matter.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:For a few bucks more, consider a mono iPaq... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few bucks more? My 3135 cost $99 brand-spanking-new at Staples.

  44. It does run PalmOS you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It baffles me why all these people are saying go buy a palm instead. newsflash: This IS a palm, just one that's not shipped running the PalmOS.

    Well, at least that's the theory. I'll be flashing mine when it gets delivered in a week, then I'll let you know for sure..

    So for those of you saying buy a palm instead: learn to read.

  45. What _are_ you talking about? by mj6798 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think the only way you could claim the VR3 is a "proprietary PDA"

    Well, I didn't make that claim. In fact, I gave the VR3 as an example of what I would consider a true Linux PDA, as opposed to to the "Linux DA".

    In fact, I like my VR3 a lot. The only thing it really needs is an MMC expansion slot.

    Forgot to turn on the brain again?

  46. battery life? by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

    One thing I didn't see on the page or any of the follow up comments is about battery life. For such a slow CPU (at least by today's standards), I'd expect a pretty good lifetime. The old Casio Zoomer (c. 1992), a product done with Geoworks and Palm before they started doing their own hardware was slow. Way too slow -- otherwise it probably would have done much better even though it was expensive. But it had a great battery life, something like 100+ hours. Some other products recharge through their sync cradles. What is this one like in that regard?

    1. Re:battery life? by Squash · · Score: 1

      The manual claims about a month given average usage.. What they definae as average, I don't know. Also, it comes with the overclock utility, which strangely seems to increase power to the screen (display gets brighter at higher mhz, dimmer at lower). I'm sure that the speed you set it to has a lot to do with the battery life.
      It takes 2 AAA batteries, and warns against using rechargables.

      --
      Squash
  47. Hexadecimal display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    You can see where everything is and view all the files in text and hexadecimal mode.


    Finally a PDA with good sense. How else to view core dumps than in hexadecimal? :-b

  48. don't forget the development tools by m@ltese · · Score: 1


    Nobody seems to mention that their sdk is freely available, including a cross-compiler, all under linux right
    here.

    Seems like the ideal pda for the linux hacker who want to develop custom apps on a Free platform.

    --
    to mail me, first remove the evil spam.
    1. Re:don't forget the development tools by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Nobody seems to mention that their sdk is freely available, including a cross-compiler, all under linux

      Uh, the PalmOS SDK is also freely available and there is a gcc cross-compiler and development environment. It's been this way since the early days of Palm.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  49. DragonBall CPU???? by Nickovsky · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I collect all 7, do I get super ultra powers and fly around and fight 5 episode long fight scenes!!!!!! That would be so cool....

  50. So can you just reflash with PalmOS? by conway · · Score: 1

    Do you think that since its Palm IIIxe compatible you could just flash it with the PalmOS?
    If so, it can be a cheap memory upgrade for my 2MB Palm III while keeping the old one for someone..
    'Cause the only thing that makes a Palm great is all the software and SDKs for it.

  51. nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    % cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch
    % ls
    alpha/ cris/ ia64/ mips/ parisc/ s390/ sh/ sparc64/
    arm/ i386/ m68k/ mips64/ ppc/ s390x/ sparc/

  52. I bought one too... by bferrell · · Score: 1

    I placed the order one day later than the author and didn't get an acknowlegement until the next week. I'm still waiting for mine :(

    The day I recieved the acknowlegement, I also downloaded the all of the developer stuff.

    I figure that if the code DA runs on a Palm III or Palm V, at least SOME of the code that is used with those will be of use with a LinuxDA. As a rough template if nothing else.

    And, yes, I am a linux user. The argument the it will only me of interest to linux users is, I think, facicous.

  53. Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only available in the US anyway, so they'll be bust before we find out.

    Byeeeee!

  54. Download Palm OS & load it on by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    It's basically a Palm computer (its probably made in the same factury, on the same line in Taiwan or something), with the Linux OS loaded on instead of Palm OS to save on licensing costs. So they can flog it for under $100.

    Some pundits think a good proportion of buyers will just load Palm OS on it (if this as the same one mentioned in an article I read a month ago that was to be released in about a month at a RRP of US$97).

    All the hardware is fully Palm OS compatible

  55. Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't see why simply Linux over Palm is a win, you haven't been reading Slashdot properly - go and do it again, and keep quiet until you've done it.

    'Course, this is a loser product for other reasons, explained elsewhere.

  56. Recognition slow and not grafitti. by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    They finally sent mine also.

    The handwriting recognition has a box that shows the letter as your write it. That's cool, but it's disappearance is timed, so you can easily write too fast and write two lettes at once.
    Also, I havn't opened th book yet, but the alphabet seems lowercasish, not grafitti. I think some single stroke alphabet like grafiti will work better and get rid of the need for a timed input window. Does someone know if the source is available in their handwriting?

    Also, I need a simple serial terminal for this. It doesn't run Palm or Java apps, so I'm limited to writing my own right now.

  57. Did some digging... a Palm clone from PC-Chips by danm73 · · Score: 1

    I'll bet Palm Computing's Legal team will go after this one. It's a PC-Chips _hardware_ clone of a PalmIII. Flashable too. The pictures seem to imply this device is what the LinuxDA actually is.. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/20102.html

  58. co-pilots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks to me that they just got linux to run as co-pilot. Reminds me of the Jayz Song

    "Got this Chinese chick, had to leave her quick'
    Cause she kept bootleggin my shit - man"

    if he only knew about linux

    "Got this Linux chick, had to leave her quick'
    Cause she kept copying my shit - man"

  59. wow its not vaporware! by Kewlhand`tek · · Score: 0

    I was sowndering about if the thing even existed, since i ordered one 2 months ago! I thought they took my 89 bux and ran

    --
    The Arkie Libertarian
  60. This is the Palm III Clone from PC-Chips... by danm73 · · Score: 1

    ...dressed in Linux. Anyone with the displeasure of having worked with PC-Chips motherboards cringe at the thought of a PC-Chips PDA. Palm Computing legal is gonna take a fit unless LinuxDA's version isn't PalmOS flashable/hackable . This URL to The Register has the relevant links http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/20102.html

  61. Re: runthe PALM EMU then by cb0y · · Score: 1

    Woudlnt the palm emu run on a linux on dragonball?

  62. Is it hackable? by Linux+Freak · · Score: 2

    Anybody know if you can get to a shell? I'm always looking for another device to run SETI on (hey, I'm a stats whore). ;-)

  63. how much crack did they smoke? by small_dick · · Score: 2

    Why on earth anyone would release such a thing, with the name "Linux" on it, without disclosing all the technical and programming info, as well as the in-house development stuff is beyond me.

    The SDK download wants you to agree to a fairly restrictive license, the tar files have cores in them, the docs are almost useless, and there is no way to backup or restore the unit from linux.

    Someone at empowered technologies is a very confused person. Without more hacking info, that is easy to get, this thing is doomed.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  64. New Linux PDA by Samsing by mupi · · Score: 0

    Samsing just released their newest Linux PDA... I just read about it on their site and it looks awesome. It has a DragonBallZ 133Mhz processor and 128M ram and 2 USB ports on the side.

  65. Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor by PopStar · · Score: 1
    That it's cheap is about the only reason I can see to get this thing. I'll stick with my Palm.

    Wow. That looks pretty funny out of context.

  66. Originality and Linux? by MattyG · · Score: 1

    This comes from a former Linux 'fanatic'. Why is it that Linux always seems to be about duplicating other OS's/tools? It seems like there's never any creativity...

    * Checkbook programs that try to duplicate MS Money/Quicken
    * Linux trying to duplicate UNIX
    * KDE trying to look like Windows
    * this handheld copying Palm OS as closely as possible

    Is there ever any originality in Linux development?

    1. Re:Originality and Linux? by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      (Score -1, offtopic -- but I just had to respond to this jab)

      Actually, KDE has done some pretty innovative stuff over the past year or so -- things that can't really be directly attributable to either Windows of MasOS (OS X, whatever).

      I was rather startled the first time I saw someone boot up XP, though -- it looked a whole lot more like the typical KDE desktop I see around than anything else I'd seen so far -- right down to using the Mandrake star as one of the Explorer buttons and assigning personal login icons to each of the machine's users.

      Actually, as I consider myself a member of the free software community, I take this as a high compliment. While fearing our impact, MS has also apparently chosen to copy the few areas in which we have begun to lead them in innovation.

    2. Re:Originality and Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called borrowing the best parts of everything, and putting them all together in one place.

      You know, I'd really like a machine with all the power of the Unix command line, but with a modern GUI and the ability to run on commodity hardware. And I don't want to pay any money for it. I want it all for free.

      Sounds like a fairy tale, huh?

      Ah, the magic of Linux :-)

    3. Re:Originality and Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "assigning personal login icons to each of the machine's users"

      sorry, but that was in MacOS a long time ago

    4. Re:Originality and Linux? by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      be quite children, you're both wrong anyway.

      using logo's/foto's in the login manager was in sgi-irix a long time before it even appeared in mac-os. actually, mac-os introduced this together with the multi-user capabilities of OS9, which is not *a long time ago*.

      i'm probably not the one with the best historical knowledge on this, so someone can probably correct me on this and claim someone else has done this before sgi.

      although i like the way they made it look in the XP login screen (shoot me, i don't care), this just goes to show that there's hardly any *real* innovation in interface-design land.

      this is anyway *way* off-topic...so let's stop this thread.

      meneer de koekepeer

  67. Network? by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Until they support wireless with these things it is just like buying another expensive watch. I have a agenda but until it does wireless it just sits on my desk lifeless.

    --


    Got Code?
  68. it doesn't really run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It runs a hacked version of uclinux with apparently none of the userland utilities. That means it's less open than Palm.

    If it actually ran Linux, you could easily port software to it, and that is a big plus for many people.

  69. pcmcia by peepo · · Score: 1

    any commercial linux pda with a pcmcia slot?

  70. Let's hack it to run Pocket PC !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just had to say it.