Slashdot Mirror


User: rworne

rworne's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,031
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,031

  1. Re:I don't speak lawyer..... on CA Appeals Court Upholds Spam Law · · Score: 1

    Funny how that ADV:ADLT works.

    The whole purpose of that is to delete the offending spam without having to open the actual message, but if you want to be removed, you are greeted with a removal notice along with an ad for HOT TEEN P*SSIES

    Wonderful

    Robert W.

  2. Re:The cost alone.. on Maine buys 38,600 ibooks for Public Schools · · Score: 1
    The simplest answer to that problem is that if you didn't pay for it, you'll care less about caring for it. Just like people treat rental cars.

    I'm sure once one or two of those instructors had to shell out dough to replace those computers, a newfound respect for these things will occur.

    iBooks are pretty darn tough in the way they are built, and remarkably cheap for an Apple offering. I can't think of a better choice.

    Robert

  3. Re:Is it really extinct? on Coming Back Soon... The Tasmanian Tiger? · · Score: 1

    The article you mention states that they collected "hair and faecal samples."

    Well, if that's the case, it should be quite easy to determine if the animal isn't extinct by seeing if the DNA contained in the sample they are attempting to clone matches the DNA they can find in these samples collected in the wild.

    There, now where can I pick up my Nobel prize?

  4. Re:Beyond Here Lies Paranoia on McAfee Will Ignore FBI Spyware · · Score: 1

    Slashdot munged my last post!

    To put out various conspiracy theories, we can always assume that the DOJ and M$ have gotten together to allow a "hand-slap" judgement/settlement in return for expressly putting such a back door into XP and it's ilk. Something along the lines of the "NSA Key" that made the rumor rounds a year or two ago.

  5. Re:Beyond Here Lies Paranoia on McAfee Will Ignore FBI Spyware · · Score: 1

    If we want to put out various conspiracy theories, we can always assume that the DOJ and M$ have gotten together to allow.

  6. Re:Using OS/2 on Mplayer Charges License Violation · · Score: 1

    For shame!

    OS/2 was one of MS's biggest competitors back in the early-mid 90's. Yes, there actually were competing commercial operating systems to MS offerings once!

    IBM dumped a ton of money into convincing users that OS/2 was good for the home, and better than the Windows 3.11 (and later Win95) alternative. They eventually gave up a short while after Windows 95 was released. Apparently people who said OS/2 sucks for having a 20MB disk install and a 16MB memory requirement were more than happy to supply the bucks to update their hardware for Win95.

    Too many people apparently forgot the big OS/2 vs. Win 95/Windows NT battle and all the dirty tricks and FUD that was spread. One classic example was a Ziff-Davis publication's "10 best-selling software products list" being put on hiatus when OS/2 Warp 3.0 landed in the #1 position for several weeks, beating out MS's offerings, only to return after OS/2 dropped off the chart.

    OS/2 is a casualty of MS's monopolistic practices, and should be at least championed as a fallen hero in the MS monopoly battles rather than beat upon because it is an IBM (and ex-MS) product.

    Robert Worne (Former Team OS/2 member)