It seems to me that the solid-state physicists theory that "Fundamental Laws" are only emergent rules that in most cases accurately portray the actual reality of the universe, would do away with the need to have the inelegant, unimaginative and feeble "Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics".
IMHO any theory that would do away with "Many Worlds" is a big step in the right direction. My biggest problem with "Many Worlds" is that those who embrace this interpretation gladly accept unnecessary infinities in the results of their calculations where most scientists recognize that their theory is in serious trouble when they start seeing infinities in their solutions.
The universe is big enough for randomness, I'm just not sure it's big enough for infinity.
-~-~-~-~-~
"I have set my life upon a cast, and I will stand the hazard of the die!"
-- Shakespeare, Richard III
What would be cool is if they could give the dogs frickin laser beams that could open the shrinkwrap on a typical DVD!
It seems to me that the solid-state physicists theory that "Fundamental Laws" are only emergent rules that in most cases accurately portray the actual reality of the universe, would do away with the need to have the inelegant, unimaginative and feeble "Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics".
IMHO any theory that would do away with "Many Worlds" is a big step in the right direction. My biggest problem with "Many Worlds" is that those who embrace this interpretation gladly accept unnecessary infinities in the results of their calculations where most scientists recognize that their theory is in serious trouble when they start seeing infinities in their solutions.
The universe is big enough for randomness, I'm just not sure it's big enough for infinity.
-~-~-~-~-~
"I have set my life upon a cast, and I will stand the hazard of the die!" -- Shakespeare, Richard III
-~-~-~-~-~