Slashdot Mirror


MPAA training Dogs to Sniff Out DVDs

LandownEyes writes "The dogs, Lucky and Flo, faced their first test at the FedEx UK hub at Stansted Airport. "FedEx was glad to assist in Lucky and Flo's first live test in a working situation. They were amazingly successful at identifying packages containing DVDs, which were opened and checked by HM Customs' representatives. While all were legitimate shipments on the day, our message to anyone thinking about shipping counterfeit DVDs through the FedEx network is simple: you're going to get caught." Kinda makes me thing twice about shipping anything through FedEX. Seriously, this is like training drug dogs to find plastic bags."

728 comments

  1. This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope so.

    1. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by One+of+the+abnormals · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it's an official MPAA thing... see the PDF linked from the bottom: http://mpaa.org/press_releases/2006_05_09.pdf

      --

      2b || !2b =?
    2. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      so they try to blame piracy on their 6.1 billion loss when in actuality it was frivilous stuff like training dogs to find DVD's...yeah to hell with them helping the blind or finding real drugs, let's just change all that to them finding DVD's!

    3. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by pyrote · · Score: 5, Insightful

      6.1 billion loss

      I knew my giganews subscription was going to a good cause :)

      honestly though... it's really because they are just whining about everyone else making money with Itunes and other digital delivery services. Working at a electronics store, I never have anyone come up to me and ask, "where do I find the cd-players?". to be honest, I can't remember a single sale where a cd-player was involved. BTW, I sell about 10 or more MP3 players each day.

      I should send a box of loose blank DVD's with 'Screw you MPAA' written on them for their next photo-op on finding dvd's.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    4. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what else they're looking for. Should I expect to be arrested if they accidentally discover my order of the German CD "lesbian chestpoopers #37?"

    5. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

      I work as an electronics associate aswell, and we don't even sell cd players.

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    6. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...my order of the German CD "lesbian chestpoopers #37

      link plz

    7. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Gawd that's funny! The thought of all those dogs being trained to sniff out copyright violations is just ... the ribs hurt ... is just...

      What?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    8. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      Should I expect to be arrested if they accidentally discover my order of the German CD "lesbian chestpoopers #37?"

      Everthing went downhill after #35, I don't even think they use real poop in #37.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, this brings up a good point...no, not that one you sick bastard.

      This is more time consuming and wasteful than it first seems. How would they know if anything was illegal unless they looked at the data on each DVD. Even then they cannot know for sure that it isn't someone moving data that they rightfully own, can they? I know if they uncover 500 copies of the same movie, that is likely piracy, but they still need to individually inspect the disks.

      These are amazing dogs if they can smell the difference between pirated data and fake data. And can they search these packages without any sort of warrent or anything?

    10. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Phreakiture · · Score: 2, Funny

      I should send a box of loose blank DVD's with 'Screw you MPAA' written on them for their next photo-op on finding dvd's.

      I have a better suggestion. Label them with the names of various movies. That way, when they are determined in court to be blanks, you will have made royal asses out of them.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    11. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by LiMikeTnux · · Score: 0

      as an emplyee in the airline industry, as per FAA (and europes equiv) regulations, all packages being shipped by air are subject to search and seizure....whether DVDs are dangerous to an aircraft has yet to be determined ;)

      --
      yap
    12. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by spamking · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Jack Bauer could find a way to hi-jack a plane with a copy of Brokeback Mountain on DVD.

    13. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by zotz · · Score: 1

      better burn fuzz on them first - don't leave them truly blank...

      wwnnsnmsnm

      all the best,

      drew
      -----
      http://www.ourmedia.org/node/187924
      Bahamian Nonsense

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    14. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by IAmTheDave · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And can they search these packages without any sort of warrent or anything?

      And here is the real question. At what point in time did FedEx get the OK to open my mail? Is my mail shipping something that can only be illegal? Last time I checked, shipping cocaine is ALWAYS illegal. But shipping DVDs - does this mean that every time I send a DVD as a birthday gift, FedEx suddenly has MPAA (new name for the US government) permission to open my package?

      If there was a line at rediculous with this **AA shit, this just blew the line away in it's dust.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    15. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'll start using old ground up DVDs as packing material.

    16. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      And get sued for having 4 consecutive bytes in the same order as 4 bytes from Mission Impossible III?

      No Way...

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    17. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suggest putting broken pieces of old AOL CDs into every packages...

    18. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by skarphace · · Score: 2, Informative
      At what point in time did FedEx get the OK to open my mail?
      FedEx isn't opening your packages, it's customs. This only pertains to overseas shipments.
      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    19. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by GmAz · · Score: 1

      Or, download the free public movie trailers to those movies, burn them and then send them.

      --
      Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
    20. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

      Well of course, he just breaks the disk and he has a sharp pointy edge that he could put an eye out with.

      Of course, if you want to get more creative example, (since nail clippers are "legal" again), Jack just takes his clippers and the DVD into the lavatory and files out a passable shiv.

      But since its Jack Bauer, its all good right?

      --

      You either believe in rational thought or you don't
    21. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "These are amazing dogs if they can smell the difference between pirated data and fake data. And can they search these packages without any sort of warrent or anything?"

      Ah, but 9-11, 9-11, 9-11, it's a different world now, nothing is the same, the constitution was okay in its time, but these are different days, privacy is dead, get over it, we must trust... blah blah blah...

    22. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      I ship DVD's all over the world. Would love it if the MPAA intercepted and tore apart one of those shipments. Lawyers would have a field day. Only thing on the DVD's are company proprietary data. Would love it if those dogs ended up causing the MPAA to tear open some classified DVD's shipments.

    23. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should do to the RIAA what we did to my school. They started doing random backpack checks in school for drugs, so we would bring plastic bags of every white powder we could find (baking soda, sugar, salt, dishwasher detergent, plain detergent) to waste their time.

      To combat this, on one day, everyone in America should FedEx someone a blank DVD. I think it would get rid of the DVD sniffing dogs...

    24. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously should have re-read what I said before posting...
      Take two...

      I think we should do to the MPAA what we did to my school. They started doing random backpack checks in school for drugs, so we would bring plastic bags of every white powder we could find (baking soda, sugar, salt, dishwasher detergent, plain detergent) to waste their time. They eventually got tired of it, and stopped, realizing they would never find anything.

      To combat this, on one day, everyone in America should FedEx someone a blank DVD. I think it would get rid of the DVD sniffing dogs, after having to open several million of these in one day, to find them all blank ;-)

    25. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by aclarke · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, if even 1% of the people reading this discussion sent a few DVDs like this to a friend somewhere, it would probably swamp the whole procedure and they'd have to stop or rethink.

      Someone with more free time on their hands than me should organize this :-)

    26. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It's also an illustration of one of the common laments of satirists: Writing satire is difficult, because the people that you're trying to mock satirize keep doing things far more outrageous than anything you've thought up.

      (And for those who make a distinction, the same thing is often said about writing parody. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    27. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Movie trailers arn't free, they're copyrighted and has exactly the same protection as the movies themselves. You could get sued for copyright infringment for burning trailers to a cd and distributing them.

    28. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by operagost · · Score: 1

      This would be happening in the U.K., not the U.S.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      And, (supposing this is not a TheOnion article) what happens if the new batch of counterfeit DVDs get made with unusually high levels of arsenic or cyanides in the plastic? (Setting up the dogs for death or early cancer... if they can GET cancer.) (I am not advocating cruelty to animals, but such as tactic MIGHT make the movie industry find new ways of distributing media, fix their lopsided global pricing schemes, and other onerous restrictions.)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    30. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by mpe · · Score: 1

      It's also an illustration of one of the common laments of satirists: Writing satire is difficult, because the people that you're trying to mock satirize keep doing things far more outrageous than anything you've thought up.

      Or they will treat any satire/parody as a goal. Indeed some people and groups are more or less immune to being made fun of because of this effect.

    31. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      It's Customs which means they have a right to search without a warrant. They've always searched at the border in order to stop the importation of illegal and dangerous goods. No searches means that you can't stop a force from crossing as civilians and mailing themselves their weapons prior to executing their mission.

    32. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by mpe · · Score: 1

      I have a better suggestion. Label them with the names of various movies. That way, when they are determined in court to be blanks, you will have made royal asses out of them.

      Even better find some movie titles which also have meanings in non-movie related contexts.

    33. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we've fundamentally screwed up our war legislation so that extreme things like price controls kick in automatically the day that Congress declares war. This is stupid and the reason we never declare formal war anymore.

      Compared to other wartime regimes, we're actually not doing so bad. For a war where you can't really trust the front lines, you'd have to go all the way back to the Civil War when we were shutting down newspapers, tossing copperheads into jail on the flimsiest of pretexts, and suspending habeas corpus in wide swathes of the US.

      We need to remain vigilant over the Constitution but we should also be realistic in that vigilance. The first order of business is to win, and thus end, the war.

    34. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      This is a UK story. The US doesn't have "HM Customs'" since we through out George III.

      Are you embarrassed even in the least at your reflexive, anti-american prejudice?

    35. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Well, he'd probably have to enter the plane through the exhaust orifice...

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    36. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Actually, you gave them permission when you gave it to them to deliver. Nearly all of the shipping companies now include a 'we can open your package to inspect it for saftey reasons' clause in their terms, even when shipping domesticly. As others have already mentioned, customs officials can open pretty much whatever international packages they feel like opening.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    37. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by zotz · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if you send them out blank, they magically might not be blank when introduced into evidence in court. That could pose a problem...

      all the best,

      drew
      -----
      http://www.ourmedia.org/node/145261
      copyleft song contest in the works.

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    38. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by cc_pirate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please tell me how we can "win" a war against an undeclared and unidentified enemy? How do you define an "end" to such a "war". Answer: You can't.

      Face it, the "War on Terror" will NEVER end, just like the "War on Drugs". It is the perfect political tool. Do whatever you want and justify it based on the "war". And since the "war" never ends, you can do this forever.

      --

      "There are laws that enslave men, and laws that set them free. " - Sean Connery as King Arthur

    39. Re:This is a TheOnion article, right? by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If I hadn't posted here, I would mod you up. You have just replaced Deuce Biggalo as my new hero.

  2. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There goes my plan to smuggle drugs by DVD.

    1. Re:Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to this, of course, is to put lots and lots of white powder in your DVD case!

    2. Re:Damn! by jsnipy · · Score: 1

      two words: scented dvds

      --
      -- if you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
    3. Re:Damn! by DerKlempner · · Score: 1

      But here comes my plan to smuggle DVDs by drugs!

      --
      UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
  3. In other news by ArTiCwInD · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Dogs have been trained to sniff out potential downloaders from airport custom queues, more news at 11"

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it would be quite easy to sniff out slashdot readers ... :)

  4. OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Entropy · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a tad late for april fools, or do DVDs have some odour that we humans just can't pick up on? I mean, WTF????

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
    1. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by bladesjester · · Score: 4, Informative

      CDs and DVDs do indeed have a distinct scent. I know this is going to sound weird, but take the cover off of your spindle of cdrs and sniff.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    2. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Entropy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right. So I did as you suggested. And I don't know whats weirder. That my DVD spindle _does_ have a scent. Or that it struck me as smelling like celery ..

      --
      The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
    3. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crappy movie = DVD that smells like crap

    4. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by jrmiller84 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, they smell like waffles. Someone please back me up on this...

      --
      I will forever be a student.
    5. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      This might sound strange...but I know the smell of DVDs quite well. It's a strong scent...

    6. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I noticed the smell the first time I opened a spindle of cds years ago. Books have a scent, cds have a scent, and so does pretty much everything else.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    7. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Funny

      aye... everything has a scent except iocane poison.

      I'd stake my life on it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by coleblak · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm off to disprove tha^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Operator lost.

      --
      77 HITS
      Really Long Off Topic Combo
    9. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by NoStrings · · Score: 1

      My latest spindle of CDs has a very odd scent. I recently moved, and the CDs got packed in the same box as my spices (don't ask). When I unpacked the box, all the CDs had (and still have) a very strong scent of curry and other assorted spices. It doesn't seem to have affected them in any other way. Maybe I'll have to use them all for storing collections of Indian recipes.

    10. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      Plastics have a way of absorbing traces of smells and tastes... try filling a water bottle you use a lot with water then mixing it with iced tea mix or something, and you'll be tasting it for a while

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    11. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by kakofb · · Score: 1

      Carbon Monoxide?

    12. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The chemical dyes in recordable DVDs do have a scent, but pressed DVDs are just plastic and aluminum. This may put a damper on small to medium size pirate operations that record cams onto DVD-Rs and friends trading with each other for free, but it won't stop the professional pirates with DVD pressing plants. This also means the dogs will hit on any package with recordable DVDs: legit data, blank media and pirated movies. You can easily DDoS the system by shipping a blank DVD in every FedEx package.

      from the MPAA press release:
      They were amazingly successful at identifying packages containing DVDs, which were opened and checked by HM Customs' representatives. While all were legitimate shipments on the day, our message to anyone thinking about shipping counterfeit DVDs through the FedEx network is simple: you're going to get caught.
    13. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's true.. I have experience with this iocane poison...

    14. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by guinsu · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I am not the only one to think a spindle of CD-rs smell like waffles.

    15. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my "promotional" material Spot. The titles written on the spindles is just some weird coincidence...

    16. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by shawb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While all were legitimate shipments on the day

      Translation: physical piracy really doesn't happen much.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    17. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Reverend528 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, fortunately, the MPAA can't actually train the dogs to recognise the scent of pirated DVDs without first posessing pirated DVDs. And if they had any pirated DVDs, they'd have to sue themselves for six billion dollars. Logically, these dogs can only recognise legitimate DVDs, so the MPAA just has to search every parcel that the dogs don't identify.

    18. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by surprise_audit · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You can easily DDoS the system by shipping a blank DVD in every FedEx package.

      It might even be possible to improve the liklihood of a 'hit' if you include a fragment of a DVD. I'm sure we've all burned our share of 'coasters' - save 'em up, snap each one into 3 or 4 pieces and drop a piece into each package. If the dogs are sniffing the chemicals in recordable DVDs, a broken one should smell *really* good...

    19. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by arose · · Score: 1

      How do they determine legitimaty? What if I ship an unlabled DVD-R?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    20. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Best loophole ever: send a disc that's a copy of something you own. When it's discovered, state that you send copies of discs to people you know so that you still have backups if your house burns down. It would totally work. (totally)

    21. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      They play it? Remember this is Customs, so they can search whatever they want.

    22. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      well heres some news about the uk, a family friend bought some videos legally in anouther country (singapore/hongkong i believe from either emi or virgin megastore) anyway, they were for a kiddie in england with a learning disability, this kiddie in england received a knock at the door and is now getting done for international copyright voilations!!

      fucking hell is all i can say, they only received the package! what a `special` birthday this kiddie had. so you can see why they dont have much credability with me, they are they type of people that would imprision a person in a coma because they are `withholding information`

      theres 3 type of jobs i believe are the similar, working for the mpaa/riaa, english teaching in asia and those cold calling salespeople.

    23. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm I post anon as it would appear *I* have broken international copyright. I recently bought a DVD in one of the nations you mention. I usually dont do this kind of thing but I was mainly curious as the DVDs, which were obviously pirated, cost about 20 pence. I bought one... all six star wars films on one DVD(I might mention that I actually already own all six star wars films... I just wanted to see what the quality was like). The resulting DVD had the first three movies OK but obviously ripped from an analog source. A phantom menance was film... ripped from a digital source. Attack of the clones was unwatchable. It was a rip from someone in the movies with some idiots head in the way for the whole thing. Sith was a great digital rip. However they had chosen the wrong audio track... the entire film had Gerge Lucas giving a commentary. Oh well... only 20p... I binned it.

    24. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Inconceivable!

      You should only know of iocane by hearsay - you were knocked out at top of the Cliffs of Insanity at the time the iocane came into play.

      (Only being pedantic because someone moderated your post as informative ....)

    25. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While all were legitimate shipments on the day

      Translation: physical piracy really doesn't happen much.


      Mod parent up. He hit the nail right on. MPAA picked a random day at FedEX, picked a bunch of packages with DVD's and found nothing.

      I'd have kept my mouth shut in their place until I found something. Would've made much better propaganda. This way it just sounds idiotic. "We have this new great way of detecting recordable DVD's in shipping. It turns out it's useless, but we have it." ...unless it's just a form of power-play. "See, you peons, we can stick our noses in your luggage and shipments just like the FBI can. We're all-powerful. Bow to us."

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    26. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Plastics have a way of absorbing traces of smells and tastes

      If we could only somehow saturate the CD plastics of all accordion and banjo albums with the smell of liverwurst...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    27. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      They play it, do they? In that case, I think we have just found a use for Sony rootkit CDs.

    28. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Zemran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am one of those evil English teachers in Asia that my grandparent talks of :) I prefer to buy the legit disks as the cheap copies are unwatchable. A legal copy of a film will cost 5 pounds which is a lot cheaper than back home and a copy will cost a fifth of that but as I will not enjoy watching it there is no real saving. As for the grandparents comment about arrest, if I send a legal copy to someone they get arrested??? Who would you like to get rid of next?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    29. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 1

      Nah, that'd never work. No one would buy a accordion or banjo album. Besides, it's insulting to the liverwurst.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    30. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Not in the UK. No fair use here.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    31. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll stop soon enough. I just have to FedEx enough DVDs of a slow zoom from my hairy man taint.

    32. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do not think those jokes mean what you think they mean.

    33. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you dolts. That's the smell of syrup. Not the waffles. bah.

    34. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by linkdead · · Score: 1

      God idea!

      From now on, I shall include a DVD-R in all of my shipped packages. In a paper sleeve, so it is therefore usable.

      Honestly, I find this search utterly retarded. Pretty much the MPAA is finding ways to waste money, and then claim that it was "lost" due to pirates.

      And I hate the word "lost" now....if you never had it, you never lost it, MPAA STFU and grow some testes. Piracy is NOT theft, it's a crime in a category of it's own. Pretty much their entire misleading campaign offends me, since it's got a good point, but there are so many falsifications.

    35. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't care of your fucking country, you slave of the Great America.

    36. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Actually according to the MPAA, they calculate that app $3Bn is lost through mass produced copies. The other $3Bn is in filesharing.
      Now I might just be a bit crazy, but if say 2000 shops in the world are turning out physical copies of your work and you are loosing just as much as to the 10 million people doing filesharing, doesn't it make more sense to go after the shops churning out the DVD's by the containerload? You get to use established laws, you don't piss off your potential customers, and an individual case actually makes a difference in the level of loss. Of course it doesn't make as good (for vaying definitions of good) publicity as suing some 14 year old or a 98 year old great grandmother.

    37. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      The bulk of physical piracy happens in Asia, not in the US or the UK. The only physical piracy I've ever even seen was small time stuff at flea markets.

      I'd be real interested in seeing the RIAA trying to pull the "DVD Sniffing Dogs" show on the Chinese government.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    38. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by jdoeii · · Score: 1
      Translation: physical piracy really doesn't happen much.

      That's an incorrect conclusion. Correct would be "Pirated DVDs are not shipped by FedEx". Really, FedEx is not a viable shipping option for a large-scale commercial operation - too expensive. FedEx shipping would add a substantial cost to the DVDs in exchange for saving maybe 1-2 days compare to a no-name cargo airshipment. And that's assuming DVDs have to be air-shipped and not hauled by trucks from Mexico or produced locally.

      The article should not be taken at face value. It seems to be pure BS targeted at scaring individuals: "Don't buy disks in other countries, or you will get in trouble". And it is succeeding - the completely kooked up news event gets a lot attention. They obviously have talanted and creative PR people.

    39. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, seriously. If i need to move a bunch of pirated dvd's across a border quickly, it seems to me that Fedex is the worst way and that's not even thinking about dvd sniffing dogs. pirated dvd's don't sell for much, where are they going to get back the loss of fedex charges? why bother? torrent is free and easy. this smacks of bizarre desperation on a large level. I can't wait to see the dvd seeking dolphins that limit the amount of pirated movies coming by nuclear submarine.

    40. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded the parent up paid no attention that his username is "Inigo Montoya" ...

    41. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Soruk · · Score: 1

      Depends on the definition of "own". What if the disc is a home-made DVD video of your grandfather's 85th birthday party, being sent out to (overseas) relatives who couldn't make it to the party.

      --
      -- Soruk
    42. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INCONCEIVABLE!

    43. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Is English your first language, tucker?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    44. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it was suggested that Inigo would become the next Dread Pirate Roberts, so I think it's safe to assume he'd learn about Iocane just as Wesley did.

    45. Re:OMG! Poniez!!!!1 by someone300 · · Score: 1

      Hey, when I said to my friends: "This DVD smells like celery", they just looked at me funny. I guess I wasn't imagining it then

  5. Dogs sniffing data? by hakr89 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder what would happen if I were to ship a burned DVD with Linux on it instead.

    1. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better - ship a dvd with "very valuable" data - say the roster for your breakfast book club, write an appropriate label (eg "breakfast club") and wait for them to destroy it! (and the $$ to roll in when you sue for destruction of your personal data)

      awesome!

    2. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or an autostart function the checks if it is in a PC, and if it is, deletes everything.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by ak-74 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In that case, my friend, they send you to a concentration camp in redmond where you debug the NT kernel 8 days of the week or they cut off your genitals.

    4. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by LocoMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Was wondering something like that, considering that we ship CDs and DVDs very frequently from where I work... Anytime we make a video and we need materials from other city (like a client that wants a specific voice narrating their videos) we receive a lower quality version trough email (MP3 in my example above) and then a high quality version on CD or DVD depending on what material it is, and then we send the finished version of the video on DVD. (either as a final format, or as a preview version to be aproved before sending it in a more professional and expensive format). Most of the times we're very pressed for time and need the stuff to be here or there the very next day, tops... so any post service that did something like this, possibly causing a delay while they get sure the content is legal, would loose lots of business from us.

    5. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, just put an ultrasonic whistle inside that goes off when the package is opened, so they have an angry and/or pained dog on their hands.

    6. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly you can only recover from them the declared value of the parcel...and there's usually a maximum amount on it, and it often doesn't cover the destruction of non-physical stuff like data, doesn't cover loss of business, etc.

      Otherwise, everyone who's ever had a contract or CD of data lost in the FedEx system would have sued the living shit out of them.

      The law surrounding freight shippers is pretty well hammered out, the most you'd be able to do is insure it for a lot of money, hope they destroyed it, then claim he full value of the insurance.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The law surrounding freight shippers is pretty well hammered out, the most you'd be able to do is insure it for a lot of money, hope they destroyed it, then claim he full value of the insurance."

      Perhaps a coalition of people could get together and do this and pay settlements to the RIAA on behalf of others using the profits.

    8. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bye guys, we've had some great times together.

    9. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I hear that. Seriously. This makes me want to ship several hundred such DVDs. They can't *possibly* intend to go through every DVD they ship?!?!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    10. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then installs Open BSD.

    11. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by modecx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or better yet, the DVD installs the Sony rootkit! If that's not poetic justice, nothing is!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    12. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Evilest+Doer · · Score: 1
      Well, that is one thing to explain to them. You need to send video data. I used to burn CD's and DVD's of my data results when I was in the research world. Apparently now they would root through all my burned DVDs of results to see if I am shipping movies. It is ridiculous in the extreme. I plan to write to them and tell them that they have just lost all business from me, and other people should do the same. Tell them that you are doing purely legitimate work that has to be sent by disc and you can't abide them peeking into your mail, so you will use a different carrier.

      It's one thing for me to hate your freedom. It's my job description. Apparently, FedEx and the MPAA hate your freedom as well.

      --
      I feel like death on a soda cracker.
    13. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by asretfroodle · · Score: 1

      Why do you want to support the RIAA?

      Wouldn't it be better to lobby for changes in the way they operate?

    14. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise, everyone who's ever had a contract or CD of data lost in the FedEx system would have sued the living shit out of them.

      there's a pretty big difference between "lost" and willfully destroyed....

    15. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by utlemming · · Score: 5, Funny

      Make sure that you and your clients put the words "CONTAINS CONFIDENTAL TRADE SECRETS," on both the DVD/CD and the box. Then put a seal on the case that would indicate tampering. If they tamper with it you can argue that they violated your trade secrets, which are protected by law, and then haul them into court.

      Another tactic would be putting "UNRELEASED COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL," or for a combination, put both.

      If you have illegal material, then it is your problem. But if the material actually contains legitimate material then you could have some serious fun in the courts.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    16. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      That's hard, when their lobbying has more cash behind it than yours.

    17. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I somehow doubt they'll be booting suspected pirated movies.

    18. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by shawb · · Score: 1

      And using this technique to pay the RIAA what they are demanding would somehow decrease their cashflow?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    19. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by truedfx · · Score: 1

      ...an autostart function the checks if it is in a PC...

      I think you can skip that part.

    20. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by 3.14159265 · · Score: 1

      Well, if all goes according to (their) plan, all that will soon be illegal too, so there's nothing to worry about!

    21. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 2

      But, FedEx isn't doing the destroying, the MPAA is. The laws in that area have yet to be truly put to any kind of test, given that nearly all of their suits settle out of court.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    22. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

      Don't you think they'll check it out still, and if there's nothing they can blame you for there, then... lose the package?

      --
      urd
    23. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by ihavnoid · · Score: 1

      However, in the real world, what I suspect is that this kind of search will be done with some kind of warrant - I don't think FedEx will allow MPAA to search their stuff without any warrant.

      Actually, this is exactly what happened in Korea. Proscecutors + BSA + warrants raiding offices (end users) searching for pirated software. The result? massive fines which made many small companies out of business.

    24. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would loose lots of business from us

      lose lots of business from you too no doubt

    25. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You're aware that you would try to sue against the company that buys the laws, yes?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      It's not the MPAA that confiscates (and potentially destroys) the
      DVDS, it's Customs. All the MPAA does is help Customs identify
      potential contraband.

      There's a big difference.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    27. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Since the searches are done by Customs, it doesn't matter whether
      you ship via FedEx, UPS, USPS, DHL, or anyone else. Customs has
      to clear every package before it's allowed to cross the border
      and if they decide this is something they want to check for (like
      they currently do for drugs), then the carrier has no choice in
      the matter.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    28. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it look like MPAA would care less about you than they care about their customers?

    29. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by jschrod · · Score: 1
      This is utter bullshit, get a clue.

      The check was done by customs. Custom officers are allowed to open and check all stuff that comes in or out a country, being it trade secret, unreleased copyright material, or not. If you try to bring custom officers to court for checking one of your packets that you received from abroad (or sent), you will be laughed at.

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    30. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by shystershep · · Score: 1

      That would be all fine and good, except for the fact that the fine print in the shipping documents gives the shipper the right to open your packages. All the big, bold disclaimers in the world won't help you if you expressly give them the permission.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    31. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Fedex packages are insured. They're not going to be "losing" a lot of packages that they have to pay to replace.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    32. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by Lugae · · Score: 1

      I realize that this was in the UK--this time--and that there may be legal precedent allowing this sort of thing to go on, but this tape from EFF is pretty cool.

    33. Re:Dogs sniffing data? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      I somehow doubt they'll be booting suspected pirated movies.

      No-one talked about booting (except for you). Autostart is not the same as booting.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  6. FUD? by foundme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this real or just MPAA making false press releases to scare people off?

    I wonder if FedEx will be so keen when this thing goes live and 80% of the packages have to be opened, inspected and sealed, and the number of phone calls from customers asking why.

    --
    Please stop entering code 2,2,7,6,6,4
    1. Re:FUD? by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just to be safe, I think I'll be slipping a blank DVD with something mean written on it with all future packages ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:FUD? by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt FedEx is going to let them open some little envelope from you to your grand-mother. I doubt MPAA is going to effort or cost of training dogs to catch you sending a pirated movie to her, either.

      FTFA: "These DVDs are often smuggled by criminal networks involved in large scale piracy operations from around the world."

      If there's some big shipment labelled as "computer monitors", and the dogs pick up a scent, they're probably going to want to know if it really is monitors, or thousands of pirated DVDs.

    3. Re:FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is FUD. Why? If I were MPAA and this were true, I'd keep quiet of the whole thing and start catching shipments of pirated DVDs and true to my character, start suing people for gazillion dollars.

      MPAA trumpetting this only notifies DVD pirates to use a competing service like DHL or something, or perhaps even find a different method of transferring data, or perhaps add covering smells to the shipments. IOW, they are telling pirates how to avoid getting caught.

    4. Re:FUD? by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why the MPAA actually ran the tests at UPS ;)

    5. Re:FUD? by Kaenneth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or the driver disc.

      (man Slashdot's software blows, can't type fast, or it deletes your message)

    6. Re:FUD? by Megane · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Just to be safe, I think I'll be slipping a blank DVD with something mean written on it with all future packages ...

      I think it would be more effective to write the name of a recently released movie on the DVD. Then they have to waste their time looking at it.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is real.

      They are also working on catfish to smell for pirated bits of movies flowing in transatlantic fiber.

    8. Re:FUD? by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 1

      Erm... Catfish don't go that deep.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    9. Re:FUD? by utlemming · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, for some real fun, ship a DVD to the mother of Dan Glickman...from Dan Glickman.

      Dan is the MPAA CEO.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    10. Re:FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why it's taking so long.

    11. Re:FUD? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      Actually, the MPAA blackmailed ALL the shipping companies and Fedex didn't pay up, so they're suffering the consequences.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  7. Privacy? by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what happens when they find that homemade video a friend is sending you from their trip overseas?

    Unless they decide to actually play every DVD, or open the packaging to see what inside a case, how are they going to know?

    All a pirate would have to do is ship them in unmarked cases, or ones marked "Vacation video" and mail them to the US, where their partner opens them up and puts them in the final packing material.

    Sounds like a giant waste of time to me. And for what? DVD's. We can't even be bothered to search all of the crates coming into our ports, but hell, the MPAA has enough time and money to look for fake fucking DVD's.

    Morons.

    1. Re:Privacy? by ImaNihilist · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no. The dogs are only trained to smell burned DVDs that contain pirated movies. It's not that unreasonable. I can definitely smell the difference between my copy of LOTR and my original. The copy just doesn't smell as good.

    2. Re:Privacy? by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      Ironically, this article comes just days after the MPAA estimates loss. It would seem that they really want to stop piracy so badly that... well... they are desperate, and that could possibly be good for consumers as members of the MPAA might have to accept a lower profit margin, reducing end-user prices.

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    3. Re:Privacy? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to the article they are going after big piraters, so presumably they are looking for a suitcase with a thousand DVDs or something.

      I have to agree with you though, of all the things you could train a dog to look for, pirated DVDs is really a waste of a dog. Hope my tax dollars don't go to that. Of course, my tax dollars are wasted enough that it probably doesn't matter.

      --
      Qxe4
    4. Re:Privacy? by the+GeeT · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've got a shipment of 10,000 vacation videos coming in on FedEx. :)

      Nerds Gone Wild...on shelves soon.

      --
      "Prepare for a pride-obliterating bitch slap" - Ignignot
    5. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course if they WERE to play the dvd to confirm it wasn't the movie the label might suggest it contained, then certainly that would be a public performance, which only the copyright owner has the ability to authorise! woot - statutory damages here we come!

    6. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when they find that homemade video a friend is sending you from their trip overseas?
      Simple you go to the jail and then you explain that to the dog ;)

    7. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky they weren't in action a couple of years back when I brought back 400 or so ($1 each). Though the word on the street (myth?) was that if you only had a single copy of each, you'd be fine. Our problem was that we'd bought so many we'd forget what we'd bought and get dupes.

    8. Re:Privacy? by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      Ironically, this article comes just days after the MPAA estimates loss. It would seem that they really want to stop piracy so badly that... well... they are desperate, and that could possibly be good for consumers as members of the MPAA might have to accept a lower profit margin, reducing end-user prices.

      which of course would drive up piracy, Why pay $40 for that DVD when the kid down the block talks about how to download something one day.

    9. Re:Privacy? by NilObject · · Score: 1

      And if they play all the blank DVDs they find, goatse.cx is going to get a whole new lease on life.

    10. Re:Privacy? by melvin+xavier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, but if you think about it, it makes no sense whatsoever. Why pay 10 bucks to ship something FedEx when you can easily transmit content electronically? It's not so difficult or expensive to burn dvds. I somehow doubt that any DVD smuggling ring worth their salt is FedExing DVDs. But the real point of this story is that The Industry Is Noticing That You Americans Are Copying DVDs. And they don't like it and they're powerful so they can impose futile, invasive, and draconian attempts at controlling you hoi polloi. And that's just what you get for possibly engaging in activities The Industry just doesn't like.

    11. Re:Privacy? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "So what happens when they find that homemade video a friend is sending you from their trip overseas?"

      Simple; pack a bunch of goatse DVDs in as well. Like in The Ring, you watch the video and you die.

      "the MPAA has enough time and money to look for fake fucking DVD's."

      The government (under the MPAA's command) does have enough time and money to do this.

    12. Re:Privacy? by knowlton · · Score: 0, Troll

      They both stink?

    13. Re:Privacy? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to start a huge sneakerner-style burnt-DVD porn trading group, and see how many FedEx employees get fired the next month for watching...

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    14. Re:Privacy? by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got 50,000 pirate copies to sell of your vacation video already. Not sending by FedEx.... suggestions anyone?

    15. Re:Privacy? by NoStrings · · Score: 1

      The drawback that I see with this plan is that you would need to find (and presumably watch a clip) of all those goatse videos. Then, having seen the video yourself, you would die - or wish you could to get the memory out of your head.

    16. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually They don't. Your country is screwed. Spend your money while you can it won't be worth the paper it's printed on in a few years. Look up "Argentina Economic Crisis" on wikipedia to see where the US will be by the end of Bush's presidency.

    17. Re:Privacy? by Surt · · Score: 1

      If their final partner has to stuff videos in the US, the costs go way up because the minimum wage is at least 10x higher here. Presumably they'll also be looking for shipments of thousands of dvd's at a time, in which case it will probably look somewhat suspicious that you're shipping vacation videos a thousand or two to the box.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    18. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this obvious? I guess not.

      The goal is to move the DVD from the factories abroad into the country in order to sell them. People who download and burn DVDs don't buy pirate copies.

    19. Re:Privacy? by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      look. if they find an dvd, no worries. if they find 1000 DVDs, they'll probably look into it. pretty easy to tell. consider the size and weight of the package.

      seriously folks, get back to me when you find law enforcement spending millions of dollars to find and play every single DVD shipped through fedex, and get back to me when fedex accepts massive shipping delays and massive losses because of this. it ain't gonna happen.

      but yeah, i enjoy a good paranoid fantasy as much as the next guy.

    20. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't so strange. All pirated discs smell of grogg and sea water ;)

    21. Re:Privacy? by zecg · · Score: 1

      Here is a graphic answer: http://www.deviantart.com/view/9410862/

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    22. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nerds Gone Wild...on shelves soon.

      ...and staying there.

    23. Re:Privacy? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      o what happens if I decide to ship my entire DVD collection (legally purchased) to another family member or someone who has purchased it wholesale, or am donating it to a charity or something?
      Its not just going to be illegal DVDs.

      The biggest question is are they going after the sender or the recipient?

      Hopefully they will go after the recipient, and I'll post thousands off to Tony Blair or something.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    24. Re:Privacy? by davide+marney · · Score: 1

      The point of this graphic is to show that Federal expenditures are roughly evenly divided between military and non-military purposes. While the graphic is very good, I found the following explanatory text accompanying it to be incorrect:

      "...when the White House releases its budget pie graph it includes mandatory expenditures such as social security and medicare. This is misleading because Congress has no control over manditory expenditures."

      To say that Congress has "no control" over social security and Medicare is not correct. The graphic author is confusing the concept of "mandatory", meaning something must be done, with that of "non-discretionary", meaning something has already been decided how it will be done.

      Of course Congress controls the expenditures on Social Security. They just can't control them using the part of the budget reserved for short-term, discretionary spending.
      --
      "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    25. Re:Privacy? by General+Melchett · · Score: 1

      Come on, whilst this sucks, we all know that theyre not searching every individual DVD sized package, or playing private DVD's.

      Theyre looking for massive shipments of pirate DVD's, belonging to huge scale pirate operations.

      I have absolutely no problem with this.

    26. Re:Privacy? by ajs · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point, and for once, I think the MPAA is doing the right thing.

      They're not looking for the operation that could be replaced by a guy printing DVDs in his basement. They're looking for the operations that send MILLIONS of DVDs around the world via various shipping services. These folks are the real pirates, and if anyone is actually harming the movie industry through piracy, it is these folks, not the college kid that downloads a shakey hand-cam of MI3.

      Now, as for privacy concerns... if you had the illusion that there was privacy with respect to internationally shipped packages, then this bit of cold water to the face is JUST WHAT YOU NEEDED. Internationally shipped packaoges are checked for food items, dangerous materials, drugs, etc, etc. There is NOTHING private about shipping internationally, and has not been for decades.

    27. Re:Privacy? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      When in doubt, always follow your nose...

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    28. Re:Privacy? by shystershep · · Score: 1

      I think most people here are missing the point. This isn't about a disc here and a disc there. Nobody is going to be shipping 100+ copies of their vacation video.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    29. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. They are just trying to scare regular people. The large counterfeit pirate operations who would send hundreds or thousands of DVDs by private or public post use actual legitimate DVD pressing machines. The dogs, on the other hand, are trained to "sniff out" consumer-grade dye-based DVD+-R/RW discs. The vast majority of those discs sent by post are legitimate. Small pirate operations just download or copy the movie from a rented DVD and press and sell locally. No post involved. Since ISOs exist, copying to a hard drive and sending that way would be the method for seeding multiple titles to another location.

    30. Re:Privacy? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      So what happens when they find that homemade video a friend is sending you from their trip overseas?

      This is ridiculously easy to answer. Bootleggers deal in LARGE QUANTITIES folks. They don't ship DVDs one at a time. They ship them in quantities of hundreds at a time.

      I regularly buy DVDs and sometimes VCDs (Video CDs, an older, lesser quality video format on CD discs, for those who don't know) from foreign suppliers. Not all the time, but several times a year. I usually buy 2 or 3 discs at a time so the postage costs are worthwhile. I have NEVER, not once had a shipment held up in customs. Why? Simple. You are legally allowed in the USA to buy a single copy of any music CD, DVD or VCD that you want for personal use. If you buy in small quantities, say 3 or less, US Customs is not interested in your purchases at all. I have, however, read of idiots who bought over 100 VCDs or DVDs at a time from Asian suppliers. In some cases, the goods were legitimate. However, US Customs is very interested in large shipments of goods and those do get scrutinized. If you are dumb enough to buy more than one copy of anything at the same time, US Customs can argue that you are a dealer since the law allows for one copy for personal use. When you buy in large quantities, the odds are good that US Customs will be "interested" in your shipment and may seize it. If they seize it, in theory you can go to court to get it back, but in reality, it will cost so much time and so much money that it's not really worth it, considering that even if you go to court, you may lose. It's a valid argument that if you buy in large quantities that you are intending to re-sell them and may be avoiding paying duties on them. I've read more than once about a few guys who thought they could sell cheap DVDs or VCDs from Asia in a small mom and pop store and they get real surprised when US Customs seizes their shipment. The truth is that once US Customs decides it's counterfeit, whether it is or not in reality, you have lost the merchandise, most likely forever.

    31. Re:Privacy? by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      but yeah, i enjoy a good paranoid fantasy as much as the next guy.

      First one to find someone mention 1984 wins!

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    32. Re:Privacy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have dogs sniffing for pirate DVDs than for drugs. Not because I ship drugs (that would be stupid) but because the war on drugs is a farce anyway, and I don't think there's anything wrong with selling drugs to adults. I do think there's something wrong with making money off someone else's copyrighted material without their permission.

      On the other hand, I'm more worried about explosives than either...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Privacy? by dascandy · · Score: 0

      More like, FROM the US. Movies generally appear in the US 3 to 12 months before they appear in europe or elsewhere. By the time you're calling a movie old we are about to receive it in the cinema. Your christmas movies are our summer movies and vice versa (which does make for a cozy feeling, seeing Ice Age in the midst of the summer...).

    34. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man we totally need to vote these MPAA guys out of office! Because they are elected officials, right? I mean, how else would they have government level police power to seize and search private property on the mere possibility of a copyright infringement?

      I... I don't remember ever voting these guys into office, though... odd.

  8. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seriously, this is like training drug dogs to find plastic bags."

    Do you have a problem with that, too? I love the Slashdot mentality of how laws should be ignored if they inconvenience our petty whims.

    1. Re:Seriously by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it might be wiser to train the dogs to sniff for the bag's contents, good troll?

  9. Now I can sleep better at night by rolfwind · · Score: 1
    Knowing the MPAA won't get ripped off any longer.

    FTFA:

    "United Kingdom, Los Angeles - - The Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), express delivery company FedEx and HM Revenue & Customs, has joined forces to launch an exciting new initiative to help combat DVD piracy.


    Now people are stealing copyrights and not just infringing upon them?

    Morale of the Day boys: Don't ship with Fedex.
    1. Re:Now I can sleep better at night by kfg · · Score: 1

      Now people are stealing copyrights and not just infringing upon them?

      Yeah. We call them music industry "lawyers."

      KFG

    2. Re:Now I can sleep better at night by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Copyright infringement may not technically be theft in the sense that property of value is physically removed from one person's possession, but it still is, whether we like it or not, legally still considered to be a particular type of theft in most countries.

      Try arguing with a judge about it sometime. See where you end up. It's not worth fighting over.

    3. Re:Now I can sleep better at night by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, to some degree, I do agree with you but I was being literal with the name of the organization, which is "Federation Against Copyright Theft".

      Snort - FACT - yeah. Anyway, if you look up "Copyright Theft" on google (with quotes), it has very few hits (1500). I'm just remarking that it's an odd and ironic term, as no actual "copyrights" are being stolen.

      Actual "copyright theft" is what you can argue the RIAA does against some unsuspecting artists (with their contracts in a way) or what faceless unscrupulous organizations do to others:

      http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=14 495&Page=1&pagePos=2

      That's why when people copy, share, pirate - I prefer copyright infringement - it's more technical and says exactly what one did, not a confused term like "copyright theft." Unless you are telling me that someone stole sony's copyrights and are now legally licensing the content in their own name?

    4. Re:Now I can sleep better at night by dthree · · Score: 1

      I think the parent's point was not that it isn't theft, but its NOT theft of copyright. You infringe someone's copyright when you steal a copy of their work. Yeah, I know its semantics but when they just haphazardly shove words around just to make a clever acronym, we have the right to riducule the language.

      And I thought it was just here in the US where they make up stupid acronyms for acts of legislature.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    5. Re:Now I can sleep better at night by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You know, to some degree, I do agree with you but I was being literal with the name of the organization, which is "Federation Against Copyright Theft"."

      Reminds me of a comment somebody made here a few years ago:

      "I downloaded an MP3 once, and Metallica was no longer able to perform that song!"

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Now I can sleep better at night by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, you can choose what's sillier. Stealing copyrights or an acronym that goes FACI.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Only Criminals Use The Mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's say I want to burn a DVD full of my graduation pictures to mail to Grandma, who lives out of state, and doesn't get out much. Does that mean the package won't get there? Or that I will be arrested and charged with piracy?

    Will the DVD sniffing dogs cause my shipments from Amazon.com to be confiscated?

  11. Wrong idea! by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Given that the MPAA has been sued under racketeering statutes, shouldn't we be training dogs to sniff out any MPAA (or RIAA) executives who travel? Clearly their traveling would be a strong indication of collusion with their fellow racketeers, otherwise known as conspiracy. Given the way my nose wrinkles at even thinking about them, I'd think it would be easy to train some dogs to recognize their stench.

    Of course, if the dogs were trained to attack when they found this particular illegal substance...

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    1. Re:Wrong idea! by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of that April Fools announcement "The film and music associations announced today they are going to merge. The new organisations will be known as the Music And Film Industry Association".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Wrong idea! by eosp · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that dogs smelled other dogs' scent well. Too bad they don't piss on other dogs.

  12. Insanity by reldruH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it any wonder that of all the illegal products that can be shipped through the mail, the ones with the largest number of political lobbyists are getting special measures to ensure they're legitimate? This is really a case of money being used to influence politics. This is a huge invasion of privacy, and a nonsensical one at that. There's no way for these dogs to differentiate between legitimate and copied DVD's, and illegal DVD copies and legal DVD copies. Another case of the RIAA treating customers as the enemy. Makes me have no pity for them when they complain about being stolen from. Maybe if they gave their customers (you know, the people paying them) a little respect they might be able to get some sympathy and work with people to solve this problem. As it is, I think they're just contributing to it.

    --
    I've always pictured the color of OS zealotry as a sort of bright flamingo pinkish hue
    1. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another case of the RIAA treating customers as the enemy.
      Not that I disagree with you, but I think you meant, "MPAA." It seems like your knee-jerk reaction is more from conditioning than an understanding of the situation.

    2. Re:Insanity by geobeck · · Score: 2, Funny
      There's no way for these dogs to differentiate between legitimate and copied DVD's, and illegal DVD copies and legal DVD copies.

      Well, they could probably sniff out pr0n because of--

      The rest of this comment has been removed at the request of the TMI police.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    3. Re:Insanity by twistedsymphony · · Score: 5, Insightful

      more so then their bullying of their actual customers is their crippling of the user experience. My favorites include:

      -Buying a CD and finding the Security tag glued to the paper insert such that if I were to remove it it would ruin the picture
      -Buying a DVD, popping it in and watching the mandatory "you wouldn't steal a car" anti-piracy add. You know the one that gets stripped out when they make pirate releases so the only person who sees it are the paying customers.
      -Paying $30-$50 for a special edition DVD or box set and being forced to sit through 15minutes of advertisements before I can watch the film
      -Paying $25 for an SACD because of it's "higher quality" and hearing a constant hum in the background caused intentionally by their anti-piracy measures (because people who rip MP3s really care about the higher bit-rate version of the disc, and doesn't intentionally ruining the quality defeat the purpose of a higher quality format? They wonder why more people aren' adopting it)

      I can't wait to pay $600-$800 for an HD-DVD player, and $30 per disc only to have my resolution crippled because the HDTV I bought last year doesn't feature the latest Anti-Piracy tech... I can't wait for my Windows OS to do the same thing because I don't want to upgrade my expensive and recently bought hardware either.

      When will they realize that pirates will get the content no matter what measures are in place. there are well documented ways to easily thwart everything I've mentioned above. In the end all it does is cripple the end user experience.

      The MPAA and RIAA have plenty of numbers that show how much they think they're loosing to piracy but do they have any numbers that show these ridiculous measures actually helping?

    4. Re:Insanity by Marsmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's no way for these dogs to differentiate between legitimate and copied DVD's, and illegal DVD copies and legal DVD copies.

      Yes there is. If a dog finds a DVD (s)he watches it and checks the label to see if it's an original, before writing a report on the findings, and, if necessary, testifying in court.

      --
      Slashdot: news from nerds.
    5. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me want to enclose a blank DVD in everything I mail/ship out.

        I wonder if the dogs can tell the difference in a CD-R vs a DVD-R. Since CD's are cheap (I can probably still come up with free AOL installation CD's), would they be enough to confuse the dogs?

    6. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he couldn't just understand the situation AND have been conditioned?

      Go fuck off, elitist prick. If you understand the situation so well, either enlighten us or STFU.

    7. Re:Insanity by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      The really good stuff is on computer games with cardboard boxes....

      Trying to take of a security peel without pulling up any color is like trying to escape from a prison. Not that I'd know or anything...

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    8. Re:Insanity by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      -Paying $25 for an SACD because of it's "higher quality" and hearing a constant hum in the background caused intentionally by their anti-piracy measures (because people who rip MP3s really care about the higher bit-rate version of the disc, and doesn't intentionally ruining the quality defeat the purpose of a higher quality format? They wonder why more people aren' adopting it)

      So that's what a watermark sounds like. A constant hum. Interesting. I'll have to listen to it sometime. Is the watermark also present on the redbook layer?

    9. Re:Insanity by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just a note, if you are hearing a sound low enough in frequency that you'd liken it to a hum, I would guess it's probably not actually the SACD watermarking, but rather a fault in your system. A ground loop would be my first guess, as 60Hz power and it's harmonic are probably the most common hum you hear in any system.

      I've listened to SACD on my system, and I couldn't hear any audible artifacts. Admittedly, it's not a stellar system, high end consumer geat only, but I think i'd probably notice a constant hum.

      It'd be worth your while to do a check of your setup, and if you've a friend with an SACD player, swap your source. The problem may be something electrical you can clear up.

    10. Re:Insanity by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 1

      Logically, wouldn't that mean that the low hum sound would play at all times, or at least at all times when there was sound instead of just when watching a SACD? I installed a few car stereos and home theater systems and when there is feedback, there is always feedback. At least in my cases.

      If it happened always for the OP, regardless of what's in the drive, then he probably wouldn't have mentioned it. If it only happened only when playing SACD, to me it would't matter what was causing it, only that the stupid thing doesn't work.

      I probably don't know as much about it as you, so maybe I am missing something.

    11. Re:Insanity by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      In general yes, a ground loop is always there. One of the first things I'd check is listening to the system with no inputs at a moderatly high volume, see if there's any hum. However there are two ways that immediatly come to mind that could cause a grounding hum in SACD, but not otherwise:

      1) SACD only outputs over an analogue link for multiple reasons (because DSD isn't S/PDIF compatible and because of copyright parinoia). However people almost always hook everything else up digitally. So DVDs, CDs, cable boxes, etc all have digital inputs to the reciever (often optical) and the SACD is 6-channels of analogue over coax. Well, if one of those wires is damaged and there's some leagage on the ground, or if the SACD player is plugged in to a different ground than the reciever, hum could result. Wouldn't happen for other devices though espically on an optical hookup. No electical connection, no problems with ground differences.

      2) There's a fault internal to the SACD player, hence why I recommended changing the source (SACD player) is possible. Maybe a circut board layer has cracked and there's some leakage from the power going on or something, who knows? However internal damage can cause things like that.

      Basically, if you hear a low-frequency hum in a system, the first thing to always check is grounding problems since that is so often the cause. Pro studios often go to great lengths to ensure a common audio ground and seperate common electrical ground throughout the whole facility to avoid hum problems.

    12. Re:Insanity by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The "you wouldn't steal a car" thing makes me really mad. I've rented/bought the film, idiots. You don't need to tell me.

      How about something at the start with the cast and crew saying "Thank you for paying for this film. We appreciate it". Real customers feel better, and those who ripped it might feel some guilt if they see it.

    13. Re:Insanity by pcgabe · · Score: 1
      by twistedsymphony (956982) -Buying a DVD, popping it in and watching the mandatory "you wouldn't steal a car" anti-piracy add. You know the one that gets stripped out when they make pirate releases so the only person who sees it are the paying customers.
      Actually, I wouldn't know the one you're talking about. ...perhaps I've said too much...
      by 16K Ram Pack (690082) How about something at the start with the cast and crew saying "Thank you for paying for this film. We appreciate it". Real customers feel better, and those who ripped it might feel some guilt if they see it.
      Brilliant!

      Although, I'd still prefer to start with the ACTUAL MOVIE I PAID FOR.
      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    14. Re:Insanity by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Wait 'til the first HDDVD/BluRay players get hacked and their keys published. Then the corresponding players with that key get invalidated and are no longer "legal" playing devices for new releases.

      In other words, you buy a HDDVD-player for about 500$, a month later it stops playing high rez. You carry it back to the store, get a new one for it (hopefully? I'm not too sure on this matter, but let's say you do. What happens if the key gets hacked after the warranty is down is another matter...). There, the player gets scrapped. No, not refitted. I MUST NOT be refitably by fiat of the *AAs. So the player manufacturer has to build a player for you that only COSTS him money but doesn't GET him any.

      In other words, if you're a manufacturer of high-rez players and want to get rid of a competitor, hire some nerds and have them hack his keys. He'll be gone in a flash.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Insanity by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      I wish I had some mod points for you. That's a hell of a lot better than the "You've just purchased our DVD and we believe you're probably criminal scum."

    16. Re:Insanity by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      If it were an artifact of noise in my system... I'd know it, I'm familiar with what that sounds like and this isn't it. Perhaps "hum" isn't the right were, it's more high pitched then that, like a step below a dog whistle but "shaped" like a hum. As for my setup. I've got well over $3K into it including a Acoustic Research Power Cleaner. None of my other media make this noise, just 4 out of my 5 SACDs... that is before I sold all of them and the player because of it (the 5th disc that didn't make the noise was the one that let me know it was the media and not the player, researching similar people had the same experience and found it was the watermark).

      Tests have shown that 50% of listeners can detect the watermark while listening. Considering the type of people who buy this kind of tech I guarantee most of them are in the range that can detect it. At this point I prefer DVD-A because I don't hear any artifacts from the "protection"

    17. Re:Insanity by thebdj · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to pay $600-$800 for an HD-DVD player, and $30 per disc only to have my resolution crippled because the HDTV I bought last year doesn't feature the latest Anti-Piracy tech

      So, on the off chance that you actually bought an HDTV in the last year that does not have HDMI, which pretty much guarantees HDCP support, or DVI with HDCP support, read the last paragraph here. Now, I know how trustworthy those studios can be (that was sarcasm folks), but if we listen to them your HD-DVD would not be crippled. Everyone seems to ignore the fact that this is an option of the media, not a requirement.

      Still, if you bought an HDTV in the last year it should probably support HDCP.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    18. Re:Insanity by zornorph · · Score: 1

      Is it any wonder that of all the illegal products that can be shipped through the mail, the ones with the largest number of political lobbyists are getting special measures to ensure they're legitimate? This is really a case of money being used to influence politics. This is a huge invasion of privacy, and a nonsensical one at that. There's no way for these dogs to differentiate between legitimate and copied DVD's, and illegal DVD copies and legal DVD copies. Another case of the RIAA treating customers as the enemy. Makes me have no pity for them when they complain about being stolen from. Maybe if they gave their customers (you know, the people paying them) a little respect they might be able to get some sympathy and work with people to solve this problem. As it is, I think they're just contributing to it.

      Another interesting point is that FedEx (and most likely other shipping companies) were only too happy to oblige the MPAA in the invasion of your privacy. If FedEx had told the MPAA to get stuffed in the first place, this story would never have happened.

      --
      http://bike.stu.ph/rides - free GPS routes available for Garmin, Magellan, GPX and Google Earth
    19. Re:Insanity by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      The display I bought about 18 months ago doesn't offer any digital inputs. Just VGA and component video. At the time I didn't think about it seeing as all of my devices only supported component and I wasn't expecting HDCP to be such an important part of future compatibility (the model with digital inputs was a few hudred more). I'd LIKE for this display to last at least 5 years, regardless of HDCP being optional or not I guarantee they'll start implementing it long before the end of my display's life.

    20. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Tests have shown that 50% of listeners can detect the watermark while >listening.

      You misinterpret the results. The results are indistinguishable from two choice guessing - thus it appears that (on average) no-one can actually hear the difference. If individual participants scored significantly over 50% then they may be able to hear something, (or if particular samples were correctly identified in a significant number of cases) but this is not shown by the results presented.

      Tony Faulkner achieved "75% on certain portions of the test". He could hear something on some types of music - but since the results were not skewed probably no-one else could.

      Lies, damn lies, and statistics

    21. Re:Insanity by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      How about something at the start with the cast and crew saying "Thank you for paying for this film. We appreciate it". Real customers feel better, and those who ripped it might feel some guilt if they see it.

      Fantastic idea! A genuinely good idea in a Slashdot comment, nice :)

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    22. Re:Insanity by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1
      ... if necessary, testifying in court.

      "What's that Lassie? You say you found these pirated DVDs in a shipment from overseas?"

      "Woof!"

      "And all those DVDs contained copyrighted material stolen from my clients?"

      "Woof!"

      "And you say one of crates contained 500 copies of 'Bio-Dome' starring Pauly Shore? How would you describe his performance?"

      "Woof!"

      "Your Honor, I rest my case."

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  13. Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They trained a dog to smell polycarbonate. Great.

  14. It gets held up in customs by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that's about it. Kinda sucks if it's not a homemade video, but say, business docs on a dvd instead.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It gets held up in customs by Firehed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or even moreso if it's a homemade video of a certain "business" that you'd rather not show to the entire terminal.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  15. sniffs pirate DVDs only by kbob88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently it's easy for the dogs to sniff out *only* the pirate DVDs because those are the ones that haven't washed in months and smell like salt-tack and grog.

    Unfortunately they haven't figured out how to train the dogs to avoid catching their noses on the hooks when they open the package...

    1. Re:sniffs pirate DVDs only by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1
      Apparently it's easy for the dogs to sniff out *only* the pirate DVDs because those are the ones that haven't washed in months and smell like salt-tack and grog.

      You mean there are actually Pastafarian DVDs? No need for any more research into artificial intelligence, eh matey? Aaargh!

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    2. Re:sniffs pirate DVDs only by The-Bobmeister · · Score: 1

      I say, this is wonderful news for major drug traffickers:

      * Buy two suitcases.
      * Stuff the first suitcase full of whatever drug has the highest street value these days.
      * Buy three spindles of blank DVDs --- +R, -R, +RW (to cover all the bases)
      * Open each spindle and rub the DVDs all over the inside the second suitace, and maybe on the outside too, just for good measure.
      * Replace DVDs on spindle, and keep them inside the second suitcase.
      * Walk through airport security in complete confidence!

    3. Re:sniffs pirate DVDs only by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I heard the dogs were only able to detect movies such as Hulk and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen as these had particularly strong odors. Indeed, I would not be surprised to discover if many of the movies released today have been specifically engineered for this attribute just to make it easier for dogs to detect them.

    4. Re:sniffs pirate DVDs only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pirate DVDs... are the ones that... smell like salt-tack and grog.

      The pirate DVD's should smell like Pasta.

      All praise Our Noodly Master!

    5. Re:sniffs pirate DVDs only by dpiven · · Score: 1
      Apparently it's easy for the dogs to sniff out *only* the pirate DVDs because those are the ones that haven't washed in months and smell like salt-tack and grog.


      And they're all rated ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR................
    6. Re:sniffs pirate DVDs only by dpiven · · Score: 1

      Dogs are already alerting to "Poseidon" by rolling over and whining.

  16. This just means.... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This just means you'll need some better airtight packaging.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:This just means.... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, that really worked for drug dealers. Of course, the fact that drugs are either shipped in humans, dogs, or packed with other high odor eminating items would indicate that the idea will not work.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:This just means.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Nah, before you send it, dip the package in cocaine and you will be good to go.

    3. Re:This just means.... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, that really worked for drug dealers. Of course, the fact that drugs are either shipped in humans, dogs, or packed with other high odor eminating items would indicate that the idea will not work.

      Of the things I know... this is one subject I know nothing about. I "imagine" it's really a bad idea to ship such things via mail, and even more stupid to ship them cross boarders. But I honestly don't know what the hit to miss ratio is to smuggling drugs or anything with a distinctive odor. This is one of those things that you tend to not try.

      The funny thing is, I don't think anyone on /. knows anything about it either... and those who do won't talk.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:This just means.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of people (who are not me) sending various drugs through the postal service in CD and DVD cases, empty or with burned CDs inside as well. Kinda ironic, eh?

    5. Re:This just means.... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Well, if some villain wanted to send a small quantity of dope and they really had no option save to do it by some form of postal service, there would be worse ways to send it than inside a hollowed-out scented candle.

      "Mr Big" would first have carefully to remove the safety warning sticker from the bottom of the candle -- but not the cellophane wrapping around the sides of the candle -- and slowly, methodically, patiently carve out a hollow in the base, big enough comfortably to accept a sealed container {such as a 35mm. film can -- anybody remember 35mm. film?} holding the merchandise. He would of course save up all the wax he was removing. The Evil Drugs Baron would then melt a small quantity of wax in a specially-made bain-marie ordered from a drug dealers' supply house -- he would not need to improvise using a Pyrex basin over a pan of boiling water on the stove -- and use this to "cement" the container in place within the cavity. From reading his drug dealer training manuals, he would know never to microwave the paraffin wax, which is a poor absorber of microwaves; nor to heat it directly, which would evaporate away the perfume. He would then fill the space around the stash container with more molten wax. Now, when this had cooled, it would contract, leaving a slight depression; so the Assassin of Youth would have to perform one final melt to level off this cavity. Standing the candle just briefly on a heated ceramic tile would give it a completely flat base to which the warning label could be re-attached. Thus giving the appearance of a perfectly normal scented candle in store-fresh condition.

      Now, why anybody would be sending a cheap scented candle, ostensibly worth less than the postage cost, through the post is another question. But not one that occurs to the minds of the postal service, who after all are there to make money and probably would love to offer special, discreet and secure premium-rate services to drug dealers, if this could be done without making them look as though they were taking bribes or aiding and abetting criminals.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  17. By what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By what authority does the MPAA have to even do this? They are a PRESSURE GROUP, not government. They are NOT THE COPS, they are NOT federal agents.

    Or is this just another example of the corporations saying "JUMP!" and the government saying "how high?"

    1. Re:By what authority? by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      Fed Ex is ALSO a corporation, not the government.

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    2. Re:By what authority? by anagama · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA. But let's put this in the context of an international shipment. Customs has the right to open anything and look at it. When you ship internationally, you have to declare every single item in the package. Personally, I've received obviously opened internationaly shipped packages. If it crosses the US border, inbound or out, it can be searched.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:By what authority? by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      And being a corporation, can easily be forced out of business by pissed-off customers going to UPS and DHL.

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    4. Re:By what authority? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Shipping any illegal product violates many federal and international laws. Basically, what the MPAA has done is provide funding and support to research new ways of cracking down on offenders, thus steering (with money) the priorities of agencies that SHOULD be looking out for things a Hell of a lot more dangerous than counterfeit DVDs! Don't ask me what the heck the dogs are using as a trigger. Might be the smell of the polymer substrate material, because if it was the dye used the dogs wouldn't get false positives from manufactured DVDs. If it is the substrate, then they can probably sniff out the CDs as well, and the RIAA will be happy for that.

      Legally, they have grounds to search given "probable cause", i.e., the reaction of the dogs to a package, but morally and ethically (morals and ethics being the foundations of law) they may be on shaky ground. This whole deal with the RIAA and MPAA is purely, and unquestionably driven by greed and an unwillingness to adapt business models to changes in consumer needs/wants. This is still going to be a long battle.

    5. Re:By what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FedEx is private company. When you send a package through them you have NO RIGHTS beyond what you have agreed to in your contract with them. They can open your package for any reason or no reason. All you can do about it is not ship through FedEx.

    6. Re:By what authority? by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      >> The dogs, Lucky and Flo, faced their first test at the FedEx UK hub at Stansted Airport.

      They are NOT THE COPS, they are NOT federal agents.

      And, even if they were federal agents, they can still kiss everyone's lillywhite English asses as their jurisdiction ended about three and a half thousand miles to the left.

      Not to, you know, shatter the apparent misconception the U.S. labours under that they are the world's police force and their laws apply everywhere.

      Then again, if the CIA and their charming torture flights can't recognize the sovereignty of European nations, I guess it's unfair to expect other representatives of the U.S. government to do so.

    7. Re:By what authority? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The OP stated that all packages searched were legal, so the dogs are not clued to anything special about "pirated" DVD's.

      Everyone keeps mentioning burned DVD's, but they're going after piracy rings. That means a large shipment of manufactured DVD's, not some burned DVD's with the title written by a Sharpie.

    8. Re:By what authority? by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      So send your DVDs through the USPS then. That is a government agency and unless the government bends over backwards to help the MPAA (or RIAA) they won't be able to search packages there.

    9. Re:By what authority? by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I own a private company. I have employees sign agreements that state what is acceptable behavior at the office. They have NO RIGHTS beyond what is on that paper. I can bug their cell phones and search their personal belongings for any reason or no reason. The paper said nothing about my right to capture them into my secret underground private company lair to tie them up and torture them while they press plastic bags for 2.5 cents per 1000.

      I can violate all their Constitutional rights because thay are not enumerated on that paper they signed. All they can do about it is work somewhere else.

    10. Re:By what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the coercive power of government is exploited by private groups, then government is to blame 100%. Government holds the keys, not the private groups.

      Another way to put it -- it is not the attempt to exploit power that allows corruption; it is the existence of power in the first place. Until that power is eliminated, it will continue to be exploited.

    11. Re:By what authority? by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      From TA, it's HM Customs and Excise in the UK - who can legally look through any stuff coming into the UK. They're well within their rights - there's no 4th ammendment here.

      It's an initutive together with FACT, which is our slightly more polite version of the RIAA. Again, it's not the first time companies have helped the government against illegal activity, and there's nothing suspicious about it.

      Actually there's quite a lot of legit region 1 dvds coming into this country, as our dvds are even more expenseive than yours! Madness.

    12. Re:By what authority? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The MPAA aren't doing anything (hint: the AA means Association of America, and this is happening in the UK, so it'll be the UK counterpart). OK, so that was splitting hairs.

      However, it's not even the UK counterpart doing it. Customs and Excise is ALREADY chartered with the job of detecting and prosecuting the shippers of illegal goods being shipped via UK ports and airports. Customs and Excise are merely doing their job - they are probably trying to detect the people who send large parcels of couterfeit DVDs through the mail. Customs and Excise already have the lawful power to inspect any item of international mail. In this respect, they are doing the same job under the law as detecting the smuggling of anything else that's illegal in the UK.

    13. Re:By what authority? by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

      They have NO RIGHTS beyond what is on that paper.

      Good luck with that defense when you get hauled into court for sexual harassment. Whether your holiness wants to admit it or not, people have legally protected rights.

    14. Re:By what authority? by tehcyder · · Score: 0
      I didn't know my boss posted on slashdot...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:By what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. The sarcasm sure was lost on you, wasn't it?

    16. Re:By what authority? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Are you saying the government runs FedEx now?

      Or, more likely, that you didn't read the article, didn't spend more than about 10 seconds thinking about the issue at hand, and just posted the first knee-jerk reaction you thought up... then all the Slashdot readers who did the same modded you to +5, even though your post isn't "insightful" in any way.

    17. Re:By what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey you stupid kike, next time you think about posting, inhale some Zyklon-B first.

      Sincerely,
      the Aryan race.

    18. Re:By what authority? by PMuse · · Score: 1

      MPAA ... are a PRESSURE GROUP, not government.

      Too right. And they plan to pressure the government and/or private shippers to conduct the searches they want conducted.

      Step 1: Develop a tool that can do the searches.
      Step 2: Demo said tool in live tests.
      Step 3: Apply pressure to make all shippers use tool on regular basis.
      Step 4: Profit.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    19. Re:By what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They got the money.Think of all licensed stuff that goes through them.

  18. The False Positive? by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would be interested to know how the dog distinguishes between a DVD and any other mailed product which contains plastic wrapping. Perhaps they are operating on the assumption that plastic wrapping materials of the type used to shrink wrap DVDs are not common in other types of mail. One also wonders how much of a dent this will actually make in the amount counterfeit DVDs and movie piracy in general. It was my understanding that bootleggers generally sell on the street, at swap meets, and other spontaneous social gatherings where the counterfeit goods are priced as impulse purchases at 1-2 dollars apiece. The rest are probably file sharing downloads of DVD rips to divx and such so how many bootleg DVDs, not orders from Amazon.com or NetFlix, are actually making their way through the mail system? It is probably insignificant.

    1. Re:The False Positive? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      One also wonders how much of a dent this will actually make in the amount counterfeit DVDs and movie piracy in general.

      Not much. But what it will make a dent in is my use of FedEx for my mail-order business. I'm paying Fed Ex a lot to ship packages, and what I ship is none of their damn business (it's all legit). But knowing that FedEd treats its customers this way, makes me say: "Bye Bye FedEx. Hello UPS!"

    2. Re:The False Positive? by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I didn't RTFA, but I would guess that the dogs are being trained to sniff for DVD-Rs. Writeable CD and DVD media have a rather strong odor, and I imagine the dogs could be trained to sniff it out as easily as they can sniff out cannabis.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    3. Re:The False Positive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like I'll be getting some Fourth Amendment Shipping Tape soon.

    4. Re:The False Positive? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they are putting distinctive scent markers in the packaging?

      Just a ( probably stupid ) thought.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    5. Re:The False Positive? by jelle · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps they are putting distinctive scent markers in the packaging?"

      Since they are trying to find counterfeit DVD's, wouldn't they first need to find the counterfeit DVD's before they could add "distinctive scent markers in the packaging".

      Chicken/egg...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    6. Re:The False Positive? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Er ah, um, ach.

      I mean "they are making movies that stink so much you
      can smell them on the counterfeit dvd's".

      Yeah, thats the ticket. Yeah.

      How is that for pulling it out? :-)

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    7. Re:The False Positive? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dogs really do have remarkably good noses, particularly the ones that are bred and trained for scent work. I'm not in the least surprised that they could be trained to find CDs or DVDs amongst other kinds of scents, including plastic.

      Consider that dogs can follow ground trails left by humans that are several hours old. They can discover human corpses that are buried under tens of feet of earth, even if there are corpses of other animals buried in the same place. Some can smell the presence of cancer tumours within the bodies of patients. Some have been trained to alert epilepsy patients 30 minutes or more before they have a seizure.

      Without a doubt, scent is the most dominant sense for dogs. Contrast this with humans, where sight tends to be dominant, followed by hearing.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    8. Re:The False Positive? by jelle · · Score: 1

      "How is that for pulling it out? :-)"

      Worth fifty bonus points. You made it to the next round ;-)

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    9. Re:The False Positive? by Frescard · · Score: 1

      I'm sure neither the MPAA nor the dogs are interested a single disc that is being shipped. It would grind customs processing to a halt, and not be very efficient in finding anything anyway.

      The dogs will be able to distinguish whether a package contains just one DVD or a few hundred. And only those large shipments will be the ones MPAA or customs will be interested in.

      Once they compare the dog's signals with the shipping declarations, and find a big mismatch, that's when the warning light will go off.

      So yeah, MPAA bad and all that, but this seems to me like a rare occasion where trying to fight large-scale commercial pirace does make sense...

  19. So... by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who else suddenly has an urge to go buy a spindle of DVDs and slip a blank ( convienently labeled, "MI-III" ) with everything they ship?

    Seriously, if you do a cost analysis, you'll find that the 10-20 bucks wasted on the spindle buys you the option to ship a real backup copy in the future.

    And speaking of backups, isn't it still fair use to make backups?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, most of us are pretty sure David Hasselhoff sucks. He just happens to be *slightly* more popular here than the US of A. But I wouldn't brag if I were you - Britney Spears, Justin Timberlake, "reality" television, Jerry Springer, Geraldo.....

    2. Re:So... by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't the Canadians have to pay a "piracy" tax on every blank dvd they buy? So doesn't that entitle them to import pirated copies?

    3. Re:So... by blibbler · · Score: 1

      Even assuming it is legal to make backups (and it might not be in the US thanks to the DMCA) it wouldn't be legal to make a backup and send it to your 100 closest friends. While I can imagine there might be a legitimate reason to mail backups, it isn't that much of a strech to say that the majority of burnt DVDs of copyrighted movies that are shipped through the mail would not be legitimate backups.

      I remember back in the day hotline servers insisted that they were just "backup" servers. They weren't.

      That said, this is ludicrous. I can't imagine that many people would be sending DVDs through the post.

    4. Re:So... by marktoml · · Score: 1

      >And speaking of backups, isn't it still fair use to make backups?

      Not in the UK.

    5. Re:So... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The urge, yes. But the history of the war on drugs has shown the legal system to not find those kind of pranks as funny as we do.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    6. Re:So... by Jardine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't the Canadians have to pay a "piracy" tax on every blank dvd they buy? So doesn't that entitle them to import pirated copies?

      Nope. The "Private Copying Levy" isn't on DVDs. It's only on media used primarily for music such as cassettes and CDRs (that's the intention at least). Private copying also only applies to music.

    7. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to Jardine's comment, no, if you're caught pirating, you still have to pay the price, even if you have paid the levy.

      Which makes me wonder, why the levy?

    8. Re:So... by temojen · · Score: 1

      No, only to make the copy yourself.

    9. Re:So... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Over here (Europe) you have to pay the tax, but that doesn't give you any right to import a copy. It allows you to make a copy. Provided you don't circumvent any anti-protection schemes.

      Yes, it makes as much sense as it makes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:So... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this; but to the best of my knowledge, nobody has ever been busted in the UK for making a backup {by all means correct me if I'm wrong, I'd love a few more miscarriages of justice to cite}. And nor are they ever likely to be.

      What does or does not constitute "fair dealing" {which is a defence to a charge of copyright infringement} is to be determined by the courts. The Crown Prosecution Service are never going to allow the courts to rule on whether or not e.g. taping an album to listen in the car is legal {and it should be, since it's a necessary step in persuading the car's analogue cassette deck to reproduce the sounds represented by the zeros and ones on the CD; which was sold subject to fitness for purpose, and that purpose is to be listened to} because whichever decision they reach would be disastrous. It doesn't take a genius to see that: one way they piss off the powerful music industry, the other way they piss off the entire music-loving public {and in all probability end up doing a massive U-turn and pissing off the powerful music industry anyway}.

      So "fair dealing" is kept well and truly in a legal grey area. Anything that isn't obvious, for-profit piracy {like offloading dodgy discs at a car boot sale} gets conveniently ignored. And the fact of it not being strictly legal means it can be used for leverage. The presence of one or two dodgy C-90s in a suspect's vehicle might conceivably be used by officers to obtain a search warrant without it sounding too much like a fishing trip.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  20. Spooky... er... Spot by BrynM · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I found another article from ABC News that is (slightly) more specific. In it, they mention that "Customs officials in the U.K. hope one day the dogs will only signal when there are large collections of discs, which would more likely include illegally copied movies." This made me feel better - they were looking for bulk shipments. But then my hopes were dashed: "Trainers say the dogs have been notifying customs agents of packages with discs in them. The packages have been opened but so far no pirated movies have been found."

    Now wait a second. This is a test and they are opening real people's packages. WTF? (FTW?) I didn't know that shipping plastic optical media was a crime anywhere. Sure it's "customs" that's actually opening the packages, but the fact that it's plastic optical media is not probable cause. How many false positives have they had? Is it worth pissing off that many FedEx customers for the occasional actually pirated media (of which they've found zero)?

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probable cause is not required when inspecting packages at customs. They can inspect anything they like, for any reason.

    2. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also assumed they'd only be looking at bulk/large packages, but if they're even checking small quantities of discs in people's packages, that's bull. The choices are great... a) Send media via FedEx and the whole world sees your pictures and videos b) Send media via UPS and you get a nice envelope full of shards Seriously though, it's pretty scary that people are allowed to randomly go through your stuff because there's a 1% chance it might contain a rogue copy of such fine Hollywood films as Dr. DoLittle 3...such a threat to the world by evil criminal masterminds. I wonder if/where the small print is buried in the shipping agreement(s)?

    3. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

      You seem to be under the misapprehension that Customs agents need an excuse to open & inspect bulk or personal mail.

      They don't. If it goes through Customs, they can open & inspect it.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Babbster · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it goes through Customs, they can open & inspect it.

      And, in a seldom-utilized provision of international law, they can then urinate on it.

    5. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Customs are completly within their rights to open any baggage they want to, thats their job. Technically they don't even need "probable cause", it could just be a "check". Also, an individuals right to make a purely personal back-up copy has yet to be specifically tested in the courts.

    6. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by batkiwi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probable cause and customs have nothing to do with eachother, and have never. Bags of anyone passing through customs can be searched without any reason at all. Typically if you declare nothing, they xray your bags, and if you declare something, they take a glance through to make sure you've not conveniently forgotten something.

      I guess you've never traveled internationally? You basically have no rights (and this isn't a "bush change," it's always been like this) while you're between countries, which is legally where the customs checkpoint is.

    7. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, great, whatever. And then they can spend my tax dollars on watching some person's wedding videos.

      Can't we get back on track for fighting crime and terrorism or something? Right now, this is a waste of time and money. Tell the MPAA to keep trying, and when they can actually identify shipments of what might actually have a chance of being bootleg dvds, come back and we'll take a look at it.

    8. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Killshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I ship any package to another country or recieve a package from another country. I fully expect that customs will open and inspect the contents.

      They usually don't but the expectation is there.

      Now if this was being done to domestic shipments then I would be more concerned.

      Overall, it is still a waste of resources that could be put elsewhere.. especially since the pirate dvd problem is bigger in Asia.

    9. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a crime? Customs can only any damned thing they want. Don't blame Bush on it either, because it's been that way since forever.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    10. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you commit a crime "between countries," what happens?

    11. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Can't we get back on track for fighting crime and terrorism or something? Right now, this is a waste of time and money. Tell the MPAA to keep trying, and when they can actually identify shipments of what might actually have a chance of being bootleg dvds, come back and we'll take a look at it.

      The funny thing is, they are spending money training dogs to combat crime, the crime of commercial bootleging... or at least that's my guess. I see alot of anti MPAA and RIAA posts here but like it or not... it's the job of Customs to protect a given country from harm, whether it be biological as in the case of food and animals, or ecconimical as is the case of counterfeit Beanie Babies. The fact of the matter is there are a ton of overseas companies who's business it is to make bootleg DVDs and ship them anywhere.

      Like it or not, checking for bootleg dvds is pretty much within their mandate. You may think it's nutty... and you may think their money would be better spent on other things, but the truth of the matter is unlike piracy we are talking about a physical product, one which not only infringes on someone's copyright, but the existance of which causes tangible ecconomic harm esp in cases where the bootleg is sold as the "real deal".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    12. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by arodland · · Score: 1

      Interpol makes you disappear.

    13. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Remember, customs isn't really interested in much more than ensuring that items aren't being declared below value or otherwise trying to avoid taxes. I've had my arguments with German customs agents when bringing home souvenirs that I had purchased in Mexico for a pittance, but the overeager agent would argue that it must cost more than what I had declared.

      I've also paid VAT on stuff shipped from the USA, but that's no big deal. Only once when I purchased a refurbished computer did I have to go to the customs office to prove that the PowerBook wasn't in new condition, and still ended up paying a fine.

    14. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by swillden · · Score: 1

      And, in a seldom-utilized provision of international law, they can then urinate on it.

      Now you're just making stuff up.

      That law is used *constantly*.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    15. Re:Spooky... er... Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame Bush on it either, because it's been that way since forever.

      A little defensive, aren't we? He never said squat about our dear president, so go back to your Bush Butt Buddy Defenders club and stfu.

  21. Sniffing all day long by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    Those two dogs are going to suffer tremendously long days as servents of the MPAA. Really, are these organizations totally crazy? The failure rate is going to be extremely high because people send dvds of sorts as well as CDs all over the place, and it's not illegal. I can only laugh at this. Imagine them getting an army of dogs at this hub to ID packages that contain DVDs only to hold up the shipment of mom and dad sending Juniorette a dvd of her sister's birthday party. This is excessive paranoia on the part of the MPAA. I find it incredible that FedEx is even cooperating with these fools.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    1. Re:Sniffing all day long by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Imagine when teh overnight shipments(which FedEx built it's name) are late because they needed to open the package and review the material.

      Next time I have to use fedex I'm going to toss a dvd in the box for the hell of it. Ot maybe fill the box with broken DvDs and popcorn.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Sniffing all day long by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Now we have a good use for all of those AOL cd's!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    3. Re:Sniffing all day long by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      So far everyone is assuming FedEx is going along with this. We are talking about customs searches here, so the most likely scenario is that someone decided on a particular facility to test, and FedEx get fingered and is just shit out of luck. This will happen at all the international shipping companies and I highly doubt any of them are too happy.

  22. During the this exercise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Drugs, high-explosives, weapons, decaptitated heads, those bowling ball type bombs with the wicks sticking out, a map of Afghanistan with Osama's hidden location clearly marked with an X, Sadamm's WMD and a 1.44 floppy with future plans on blowing up the Capital Building all went through undetected.

    1. Re:During the this exercise... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Ah, so I may expect to receive the stuff I bought on Ebay any day now.

    2. Re:During the this exercise... by fixinah · · Score: 1

      those bowling ball type bombs with the wicks sticking out Watching Maher are we? =)

  23. Home movies by michaelmalak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What if you're FedEx'ing a home movie of your child's birth (including states of undress of the mother) to your mother-in-law who couldn't be there? Would the FedEx personnel be gawking at that?

    It's analogous to the P2P crackdowns where the assumption is that consumers are incapable of authoring content and only Big Media can.

    And, yes, I'm a bit surprised and quite alarmed that the tampering laws that apply to U.S. mail do not apply to FedEx.

    1. Re:Home movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you would be arrested for distributing child porn.

    2. Re:Home movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's analogous to the P2P crackdowns where the assumption is that consumers are incapable of authoring content and only Big Media can.

      Sure, because Napster's business model was all about sharing home made recordings of underground musicians.

    3. Re: Home movies by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > What if you're FedEx'ing a home movie of your child's birth (including states of undress of the mother) to your mother-in-law who couldn't be there?

      Yeah, unless they can teach the dogs to smell the difference between a bootleg DVD and other kinds, all they're doing is setting themselves up for a big pile of lawsuits.

      OTOH, our who-gives-a-flying-f*ck-about-the-citizens-anymore government will probably make it legal for them to snoop "in the interests of national security", or else the MPAA will just work a secret deal with FedEx where they open and re-seal your packages, in the naive hope that no one will ever find out it's going on.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Home movies by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the part of TFA that informs you this is being done by Customs Agents.

      You should not be "a bit surprised and quite alarmed that the tampering laws that apply to U.S. mail do not apply to" anything that goes through Customs.

      If you're sending mail into or out of the country, it is fair game.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Home movies by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Just as TubeSteak said, Customs is allowed to search packages, and it is considered official business to make certain of compliance, packages are randomly searched, as well as some more suspicious ones are flagged as well.

      I don't know why you'd want to record the childbirth with the mother in a state of undress. Even for family members, I think it is a bit much to record it.

      At any rate, this is really stupid. Shipping legally purchased DVDs across the pond isn't illegal on either end.

    6. Re:Home movies by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      What if you're FedEx'ing a home movie of your child's birth (including states of undress of the mother)...

      No one wants to see that!

    7. Re:Home movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I plan to start FedEx'ing DVDs of meatspin.com to people in the UK, labelled with the titles of popular Hollywood movies. The movies will each also ship with one (1) Milkbone. Just because I plan cruelty to the MPAA doesn't mean the dog can't get something out of it.

    8. Re:Home movies by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yes, but watching them is, sort of, in a roundabout way, as we are in different regions. To do so would require a device which circumvents the encryption in a way that is not allowed by the licenseholder (generally). While it may not be illegal, explicitly, for you to do so, you most likely have obtained a circumvention device you did not build from scratch, which means you were involved in trafficing of circumventing devices. Which might not be illegal yet, but our hardworking Congress should "correct" that soon enough.

      (excuse me while I go vomit)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Home movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .And, yes, I'm a bit surprised and quite alarmed that the tampering laws that apply to U.S. mail do not apply to FedEx. if you bothered to RTFA this was conducted in the UK. at that point its not the US's jurisdiction.

    10. Re:Home movies by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "What if you're FedEx'ing a home movie of your child's birth (including states of undress of the mother) to your mother-in-law who couldn't be there? Would the FedEx personnel be gawking at that?"

      Not for very long, I imagine. Blech.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:Home movies by dcam · · Score: 1

      What if you're FedEx'ing a home movie of your child's birth (including states of undress of the mother) to your mother-in-law who couldn't be there? Would the FedEx personnel be gawking at that?

      In that case you are a strange an unnatural person. Who in their right mind takes a video of their children being born? Who in their right mind wants to see such a video?

      --
      meh
    12. Re:Home movies by Moqui · · Score: 1
      I can assure you that there is at least one Usenet group dedicated to this type of video.

      alt.binaries.coming.out

      If you can think it up, it exists on the dark-side of the Web.

    13. Re:Home movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, lots of people *do* tape the delivery. It's become so popular that many hospitals are banning camcorders in the delivery room altogether. Not for the privacy of the mother, but in case the video happens to show the medical staff making a mistake... Wouldn't want *that* to be shown at the malpractice trial - they're prefer it was your word against theirs.

    14. Re:Home movies by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a TV program on Belgian national TV that is about pregnancy and they do show the whole thing.

    15. Re:Home movies by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Not for very long, I imagine. Blech.

      A bootleg software CD I bought in Malaysia had a bunch of Carpenters songs in the root directory. Same principle?

    16. Re:Home movies by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      Not that I particularly care for this happenening or think it can't happen here - but why would US mail tampering laws be enforced in the UK? I'm assuming you just missed the "UK" part and don't want the US to enforce it's laws onto other countries.

      Unfortunatly in this case it's also not fedex doing it but customs officials so your whole point (fedex violating what should be law) is moot anyway. I'm betting FedEx doesn't much care for this either (cuts thier profits to increase another companies profits, I can't imagine any business liking that too much).

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    17. Re:Home movies by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Well, since it contains images of an undressed minor, it would be child pornography plain and simple. You, the intended recipient, and everyone who had seen the recording would be deemed to be nonces.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    18. Re:Home movies by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Multi-region DVD players are legal on the European mainland, and so probably in the UK too. It has been ruled by one of the European Courts that region-locking is anti-competitive behaviour.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    19. Re:Home movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the moment the baby's head shows, it becomes child porn. Prepare for jail.

  24. Sniffing region codes by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now when they train the dogs to sniff things out based on region code, that will be news.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    1. Re:Sniffing region codes by Megane · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering when they'll be trained to sniff out a video nasty.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  25. Fortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I hear the RIAA hasn't had much luck in getting dogs to sniff out counterfeit MP3s.

  26. Send a DVD in every FEDEX package. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they tell the difference between an AOL CD and a DVD? I still have piles of the former that could be used as filler in FEDEX shipments.

  27. Re:ESR sniffs too... by fishbowl · · Score: 0

    Assuming this isn't fraud, it seems to me your problem is Eric can ask for this sort of rider and expect people to deliver, while you can't.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  28. you keep checking those envelopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    while the real pirates are filling shipping containers with millions of them

    this is nothing more than a childish bit of MPAA bullshit humor , i would expect funnier jokes or even lies from primary school kids, perhaps the MPAA dont realise they have lost!

    keep grabbing sand

  29. Any hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My list of 'bad' companies is getting very long. Is there still a 'safe' country I can move to and still have internet accesst?

    Is there an open source program out there that when I tell it something I'm going to buy it will say: "Wait, product A is made by O who does E, U, and I. Try company D, H, or T instead."

    1. Re:Any hope? by diablomonic · · Score: 2
      or even better, a pda program that uses a camera to scan the barcode when your at a store/supermarket, lets you scan in the price (ocr) as well, tells you if the company is "ethically responsible" and more importantly why (sometimes we may not agree that a companies actions were deserving of a blackmark).

      it also uses OCR to scan your bill at the checkout, to check for overpriced items, double charges and items you didnt purchase by comparing against those items you scanned in as a purchase(according to "A current affair" , who obvoiusly has an interest in stirring up controversy, but yet may still be correct, pretty much everytime you go shopping you get ripped of by checkouts scanning things at a higher price. there is a guy who goes round and somehow knows which items are likely to be overcharged, and ends up getting almost everything free (if it overscans at a supermarket here in australia, you get it free (if you notice))

      end result: huge power (which has to be carefully controlled: dont want company a putting in false ethics violations for competitor company b in the system or similar) to influence companies actions through virtual boycotts, cheaper stuff at the supermarket cos they stop ripping you off.

      --
      watch "the money masters" on google video
    2. Re:Any hope? by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      "A Current Affair" ONLY has an interest in stirring up controversy. Why do people still think that this is journalism at all?

    3. Re:Any hope? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      No. Perhaps it is time to give the moon a try.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  30. Dogs sniffing bits and bytes by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Funny

    The dogs have been specially trained by Scotland Yard to be able to not only sniff for the existence of DVDs in a package, but to sniff the bits and bytes embedded on the DVD. The 0s have a different smell from the 1s, so the dogs have been trained to interpret the bit patterns to know whether the DVD is pirated or legitimate.

    Still, the dogs have trouble in determining the legitimacy of 10% of the DVDs. For those where the dogs have doubt, the Customs agents have been instructed by the MPAA to classify them as pirated copies. It will then be up to the sender to show up in court to prove it was not pirated.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    1. Re:Dogs sniffing bits and bytes by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Ah, the good old "guilty until proven innocent" ploy. Happening more and more in our country, I dare say.

    2. Re:Dogs sniffing bits and bytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually I'm pretty sure that DVD's don't store data as 1s and 0s (eg pit=0, raised area=1). They read a one or a zero based on whether there is a change in the surface of the disk. So if a change (from flat to bump, or from bump to flat) might = 0, and a non-change (from flat to flat or from bump to bump) might = 1. The following example (imagine it is a DVD track viewed from the side) illustrates this:
      Disk view: _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ -

      Data read*: 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1
      *Unimportant Note: the asterisk was only put there because the double space I used to align the two lines keeps getting collapsed into a single space
    3. Re:Dogs sniffing bits and bytes by Babbster · · Score: 2, Funny

      The 0s have a different smell from the 1s, so the dogs have been trained to interpret the bit patterns to know whether the DVD is pirated or legitimate.

      Actually, I heard that there is a cable coming out of the dog's rectum which is connected to a small monitor, allowing officials to actually watch the pirated content the dog is smelling.

      In other news, portable DVD players made in Korea can actually be powered by Kibbles'n'Bits...

    4. Re:Dogs sniffing bits and bytes by locofungus · · Score: 1

      True

      It's the transitions that are detected.

      But when thinking about then encoding on the disk it can make sense to consider it as pits and flats as there are certain clever features that are lost if you just think of it at the EFM level. (see for example http://www.laesieworks.com/digicom/Storage_CD_8to1 4.html)

      It gets more complicated because the signal is (approximately) DC free - there are three merge bits between every 14bit code word that can be chosen at random (provided the other requirements of the encoding are met[1]) and _should_ (not always are) be chosen so that the DC content of the signal is kept as close to zero as possible. This doesn't make sense when thinking about transitions as being a 1 and non transitions being a 0 because because of [1] there must be at least 2x as many non transitions as transitions

      [1] A pit (or flat) must be at least 3 bits long and no more than (I think) 14 bits long. (this means the data can be self clocking)

      The encoding on the disk involves converting 192 bits of data to 588 bits of pit/flat. Because there are always at least 3 bits (pit/flat) the same together, the final bandwidth of the signal recorded on the disk is only 2% higher than the bandwidth required to transmit the original data despite the fact that there is masses of error correction on the disk. (This is a rather beautiful application of a theorem of Shannon that states that you can add as much error correction as you like to a signal with an arbitrarily small increase in bandwidth required to transmit it - [for various limitations like infinitely long data stream etc which a CD only approximates])

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  31. How? by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 1

    How is this even legal? They're not law enforcement AFAIK so how can they have the same powers of law enforcement? If this was the case, any citizen would be allowed just to randomly search packages at your local airport. Please someone explain all of this to someone who apparently is confused.

    --


    My sig of choice is Marlboro
    1. Re:How? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      FedEX is not the USPS. I don't know if the same rules for the material shipped apply.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:How? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      RTFA!
      CUSTOMS, not FedEx or MPAA is doing the opening of the packages.
      Try another cup of coffee, you will wake up and be able to understand then...maybe.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    3. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet if you read the fine print of a fedex shipping contract you give them the right to open your package for any reason.

  32. Who pays for this? by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

    I am not supporting piracy in terms of the mass distribution of movies, but i'd really rather not have all discs that i post / courier opened or examined for content. I don't send any objectionable material, or possess any. Like anyone, there are times when the material i send may be copyright (academic journals or the like), but i don't expect my paper mail to be opened without a warrant, and would expect that i'd not get unreasonable searches of my other mail.

    Big brother, anyone?

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
  33. It's like gum-sniffing, animal cruelty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bad enough to subject the dogs to sniffing for drugs, now we have 'em sniffing for polycarbonate plastics. There's no telling what long term effect gonna be on those canines sniffing for polycarbonate plastics day in, day out. I'm imagining to the magnitude of gum-sniffing..

    Don't get me wrong, polycarbonate may be safe, nose-wise. But freshly baked CDs and DVDs do emanates a somewhat quite strong chemical odour. It's even worse when you have a cake of them.

    Animal Cruelty activists!, now's your chance to show your stuff! See that Fed-Ex (Fed-Up?) logo? Go get 'em boy!

    De u N

  34. Stroke of genious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing that the only true way to see if the DVD is pirated is to actually watch it. Will that mean that my privacy will be impinged upon if I want to send, video, open source software... whatever I damn well like through FedEx?

    1> Make Home Movie
    2> Copyright it
    3> Mail it through FedEx enough times till they open it and watch it
    4> Sue their arses for copyright infringement
    5> Profit!

  35. Frickin Lasers! by TuoTeg · · Score: 1

    What would be cool is if they could give the dogs frickin laser beams that could open the shrinkwrap on a typical DVD!

    --
    "I have set my life upon a cast, and I will stand the hazard of the die!" -- Shakespeare, Richard III
  36. Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This owuld pretty much stop my company from using FedEx for any shipments if they do this in the USA. We ship burned CDs/DVDs all the time, and I don't want the shipments delayed or damaged because they're constantly being pulled out and opened up for inspection.

    Even assuming they have 100% identification of illegal DVD copies vs false positives once they open them up, they're still providing nothing useful to customers, with serious potential for loss or damage of customers' materials, solely for the benefit of a third party. If the MPAA wants to pay for my Fedex shipping, then we can talk, but if I'm paying for it, you can bet your ass I'll be making life miserable for fedex employees when my shipment is delayed or damaged because of this crap.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Did you not RTFA? Did you even read the summary?

      This happened in the UK.

      The packages were opened by Customs.

      This is not "solely for the benefit of a third party" (I assume you mean the MPAA). This program is testing the feasibility of catching DVD counterfeiters. Do you think those guys pay the appropriate Customs Duties?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      This is not "solely for the benefit of a third party" (I assume you mean the MPAA). This program is testing the feasibility of catching DVD counterfeiters. Do you think those guys pay the appropriate Customs Duties?

      Gift... 20 bucks. I'm sure they do pay the approperate duty... which is well zero.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by DrifterX79 · · Score: 2, Informative
      As an employee at a package and delivery business, I can tell you that packages get inspected for quite a few reasons, but less than 1% even get considered for inspection. I work in quality control, and as such inspect packages, of which most are damaged packages, and very rarely are they ever opened for any other reason.

      Further more, these inspections are carried out by Her Majesty's Customs, not FedEx. All international packages are subject to customs, and customs can open any and all packages they desire, and it matters not if its sent UPS, DHL or FedEx.

      A further consideration is that all major couriers comply with government regulations, and if the MPAA can get a goverment agency to write off on it (e.g. British customs) then they can carry out inspections at any courier, with or without permission. Most courier companies just willingly comply to do business in said country.

      But if changing shippers makes you feel better, go for it. But your package may still be opened and inspected. Especially with USPS.

      In short, FedEx, UPS, DHL, work to make money. So they comply with government requests.

      Please note, read your terms of shipping from any courier. They will give the carrier permission to inspect if desired.

    4. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Errr, yes?

      "From the MPAA press release....

      The Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), express delivery company FedEx and HM Revenue & Customs, has joined forces to launch an exciting new initiative to help combat DVD piracy....

      As part of a project promoted by the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA)....."

      This is, exactly and once again, a corporate initiative to milk the proles and control markets. There was no huge public outcry, no rampant and violent crime spree. Or are you suggesting Customs wants to collect duties on copyright violations?

    5. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you not RTFA?

      Uh, yes, that's why I specifically had to note what my response would be if they implimented such a program IN THE USA.

      I realize you want to rise to their defense, and that's fine, but please don't misrepresent my statements in order to make your own seem reasonable. If FedEx begins using RIAA-funded dogs to inspect packages in the USA, I will find that highly objectionable. Right now they are only doing it with UK customs in the UK.

      And yes, this is solely for the benefit of a third party. You can wave your hands all you like, but customs duties for pirated merchandise benefit neither FedEx nor FedEx customers.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    6. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Of course customs can open and inspect any package, nobody is suggesting otherwise.

      What concerns me is the possibility that one particular shipper will cooperate with an unrelated private company in such a way that packages with particular materials in them will be singled out for inspection far out of proportion, even though there is no reason to believe those items are any more likely to be breaking the law than another, randomly selected package. If that were the case, then I certainly WOULD switch shippers, to one that does not follow such a ludicrous policy, as we ship those perfectly legal materials on a regular basis and don't want our shipments to be repeatedly "profiled" because of it.

      Obviously if the dogs were being used or mandated by the customs service itself, then choosing shippers would make no difference, but the article seems to indicate rather strongly that it is FedEx's activity at this stage that is selecting packages for further inspection.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    7. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by DrifterX79 · · Score: 1

      I would tend to think that is it was FedEx attempting to appease the MPAA, then it would be done in America.

    8. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the one hand, you're saying that shippers always comply with the law w.r.t. inspecting packages. On the other hand, you're saying that they can legally inspect any package they choose for any reason. That second point would seem to make the first moot. Anyway, it wasn't USPS or DHL or UPS that participated in this "test"; it was FedEx. FedEx's customers have to wonder why FedEx would be so eager to aid in these fanatical (and potentially very intrusive) inspections.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    9. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you fail to realize is that in international shipping, when customs asks for assistance you comply because if you don't customs can make your life a living hell if they want to. You don't PO customs agents especially when you are a company trying to transport many thousands of packages across an intenational border in a short amount of time. Did I mention shipping companies are liable to be fined for illegal or undeclared goods that a package contains, even if the shipper lied on the shipping papers.

    10. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Good point. Back in the '80s the government actually allowed shipment of classified material via FedEx. I suspect that this sort of thing might prevent that, and such materials will now have to be couriered.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    11. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you didn't read the parent post. Im sure there are European EU regulations against this invasion of privacy.

    12. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is a bulk import to be sold on, then it cannot be a gift.

    13. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if it's under £18 per package, then there's no VAT payable, and if the customs duty would be under £7 then it's not collected. (I'm not sure if they get agitated if ten of these packages are sent from the same company to the same address on the same day, although I have ordered two or three at a time without being billed for duty and VAT.)

      That's how a lot of online DVD and CD retailers avoid charging VAT and sell DVDs for £8.99 including postage. This is welcome for those of limited means, but not of course for high street retailers (although, to be fair, it would only be £10.56 with the VAT, so bricks-and-mortar retailers would probably be in trouble even if the "small imports" rule were abolished).

      The gift limit, in case anyone is interested, is £36.

    14. Re:Who does fedex work for, customers or the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you carry something across an international border there is no such thing as privacy. Ever travel to another country? If you have you'd probably remember the big tables with customs agents picking thru the luggage of happy travelers.

      Again when you bring something into another country you have no privacy.

  37. Contact Information by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Press Release instructs you to contact the following people for more information. I invite anyone concerned about this to do so as soon as possible.

    For further information:

    Eddy Leviten, FACT Head of Communications: 020 8568 6646/ 07768 057464
    eddy.leviten@fact-uk.org.uk

    LA: Kori Bernards or Elizabeth Kaltman: (818) 995-6600
    DC: John Feehery or Gayle Osterberg: (202) 293-1966

    1. Re:Contact Information by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

      Here is a direct link to the Press Release (PDF) http://mpaa.org/press_releases/2006_05_09.pdf

  38. media mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always ship my bootleg dvds via media mail it's soooooo damn cheap!

  39. Ingestion Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I'll have to start wrapping the DVDs up in condoms and ingesting them.

  40. Let's hear it for sending the wrong message by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1
    So, all the packages they opened were in fact legal. The message to take away from this is that purchasing legal DVDs can get your packages searched, and cause possible legal trouble. You're better off just downloading a copy.

    I'm joking... sort of. Honestly, what good is this going to do, besides pissing off legitimate customers, thereby contributing to the further decline of the MPAA... ahm... oh. Keep up the good work!

    --

    I am the man with no sig!

  41. Who let the dogs out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVD sniffing dogs? Gee I have a bunch of DVD for my Mac that I always carry for emergencies what are they going to do about those?
    Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't this like in old Nazi Germany where the German Shepards where trained to sniff out Jews and the other people?

  42. Why stop at FedEx? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Why stop at FedEx? Why not have these CD sniffing dogs patrolling highschools and sniffing lockers.....ripe ground for people to stash the CDs their friends just gave them.

    Or why not have them patrol college dorms? I mean...technically the students don't have property rights aside from those the school grants them.

    Oh, thats right....because IT IS MORALLY FUCKING WRONG!

    I'm REALLY curious if there's any way to tell if your package has been tampered with due to one of these cd-sniffers, and if so is there any legal recourse? I'm assuming since its a corporation the answer is just to take my money elsewhere.

    Note to self...."misplace" all company FedEx materials and make them use UPS or DHL.

    In response to the MPAA actually doing this? Well...can any of you honestly say that while you might not have expected just this scenario....you're not at all surprised that something like this seriously is happening?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Why stop at FedEx? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Use an old wax seal on an internal envelope.
      Sometimes history gives us the most important lessons.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  43. And I was blaming Netflix by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    No wonder delivery of my Netfix discs has been slow with a couple that never arrived.

  44. Finally a use for those AOL cds! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Don't donate them to that company that wants to dump the CDs on AOL's doorstep! Save all those CD/DVDs, and send then VIA FedEx to the MPAA AND the RIAA, saying "Here's where you lose 95% of your profit! There's your pirate ring! They've been at it, helping millions of users download illegal stuff every day! And they've been delivering the piracy software FOR FREE!!!!"

    Sorry, I hate AOL and this was just too good to pass up.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  45. Meanwhile... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...a bunch of religious fanatics from the middle of an arbitrarily designated direction are packing a dirty bomb into a crate that they plan to ship to DC via FedEx which will slide by the dogs undetected.... ...OK fine. I admit it I have been drinking. Alot.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by circa1979 · · Score: 1

      ...OK fine. I admit it I have been drinking. Alot.

      Why do you feel the need to tell us this? I have no problem with people drinking, but I always found it irksome when the person feels the need to proclaim that they have been drinking. Drinking is something that should be done in the confines of a somewhat personal setting such as a home or bar/restaurant. It tells me a lot about the person when simply drinking isn't enough and they need to tell everyone they've been drinking. I don't care if you drink yourself into a stupor tonight; but please do not tell everyone about it tommorrow. Go ahead and mod this off-topic (hell, I admit it is) but I hope you look at yourself and think, "Why did I tell them that?"

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Uh... "drinking one self into a stupor" usually is a sign of not everything being right in someone's life. Maybe that was GPs cry for help?

      I don't know.

      Certainly, if my life had issues that would culminate in me picking up a drinking problem, I'd be sure to tell.

    3. Re:Meanwhile... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I suppose you missed the part about how I had been drinking.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  46. Just hide the DVDs in a drug shipment by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    We know most of those make it through to keep a thriving market alive.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  47. Include a DVD with every Fed-Ex shipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you send. Make sure you write "FUCK YOU MPAA" on them.

  48. You mean... by jsse · · Score: 1

    retrain their vast array of lawyers on their area they should excel?

  49. Since when... by Ecko7889 · · Score: 1

    Since when did the MPAA become a "enforcement body"? We already have the FBI. The MPAA should not have th authority to open up my PRIVATE mail to see whats inside. I do not know the legality of the rights of users of mail carriers, but I suspect that they should need a WARRENT to inspect my baggage. My baggage, if it did contain illegal DVDs, would not cause any threat to the carrier or its surroundings, so their is no just cause to inspect my baggage because of how a dog smells it. This is the MPAA trying to go past its privileges as a copyright holder, and not an inspecting or enforcement body. Leave it to the FBI to handle mass piracy issues, since theirs a FBI warning on the DVDs. And we all know that the FBIs top priority is the piracy of $10 DVDs, and not anti terrorism, or homeland security.

    --
    $sig$
    1. Re:Since when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in the UK buddy. Stop making us Americans lok bad with the fud and poor reading skills.

    2. Re:Since when... by joe90 · · Score: 1
      Since when did the MPAA become a "enforcement body"? We already have the FBI. The MPAA should not have th authority to open up my PRIVATE mail to see whats inside. I do not know the legality of the rights of users of mail carriers, but I suspect that they should need a WARRENT to inspect my baggage. My baggage, if it did contain illegal DVDs, would not cause any threat to the carrier or its surroundings, so their is no just cause to inspect my baggage because of how a dog smells it. This is the MPAA trying to go past its privileges as a copyright holder, and not an inspecting or enforcement body. Leave it to the FBI to handle mass piracy issues, since theirs a FBI warning on the DVDs. And we all know that the FBIs top priority is the piracy of $10 DVDs, and not anti terrorism, or homeland security.


      Fedex is not "mail". But in any case, it's HM Customs who are actually opening the packages (mail, freight, courier, luggage, whatever) - and under UK law, they don't require any reason or warrant to open or inspect packages. The MPAA are merely providing the tool.

      Customs agencies are often tasked with enforcing laws regarding the importation of illegal intellectual property/copyrighted material/censored material (typically pornography).

      Almost every other country's Customs agencies are also able to open/inspect any package without cause as well. Additionally, Customs agencies often have more "power" than the police, tax departments (IRS, etc.) and other domestic law enforcement agencies.

      --

      Fast, cheap & reliable. Pick two.
  50. Solution by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    Many businesses probably can't stop using FedEx entirely, but imagine if everyone stuck in a CD or three in every package they had to send :D

    1. Re:Solution by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Yes, "doping" or should I say "duping" (?), an ass load of packages with CDs and DVDs would certainly be an interesting DDoS attack on these dogs. That would be some funny stuff!

      I can see it now, "Hey, everybody who has a friend in the UK, send them a FedEx package with two to three blank DVDs or CDs in it on May XX." Would be hi-larious!

  51. Just one more reason not to use Fed Ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I ever ship to the UK, I think I'm going to include a few unmarked coasters just for grins.

  52. Got to love it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    They can't stop illegal drugs, people, weapons, animals (and their remains) from being smuggled but "Hey, those DVD's you burned are our first priority!".

    Geez. The war on drugs has gone so well that the price of drugs is at an alltime low (for you capatalist that would either mean no demand (yeah right) or that supply is plenty). Trafficing in human beings is making sure that slavery is with us more then 100 years after it was outlawed. Gun trafficing needs no explenation and some sources suggest that trafficing in illegal animals is just as good a business as drugs.

    But lets start checking for copied dvd's. It only fails on just few tiny details only a bastard would point out.

    • Commercial piracy doesn't bother with burners. They press them just like the real thing. In fact often even in the same factories because machine operators don't earn shit and letting the machine run an extra 10.000 copies is a nice way to save up for your kids education.
    • Casual pirates download their stuff. Sending it via snailmail would make absolutly no sense.
    • There are plenty of other uses for recordable discs like backups, demos and such. Yes it is odd that casual downloaders can afford to download a full DVD yet companies still insist on sending demos via snailmail but thats the way it is.
    • This detects only the discs. Not the contents. Reading them would be similar to reading peoples mail. Surely even post 9/11 that is still not allowed on such a scale?

    Nah this is a stupid idea. With drugs dogs you at least know that if they smell any drugs that you got a very high chance it is illegal but here they just smell the container. To actually check them to see if the disc contains illegal information is like opening a letter and read the contents. Lots of loss of privacy.

    So any real copyright infringement will be unaffected, it is just another way for people to snoop on you. Do you really want some RIAA goon to check your kids birthday that you send to your parents?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  53. Early setbacks in the program by VinB · · Score: 0

    The canine DVD sniffing program would have been launched earlier, but the first few batches of doggy recruits kept getting expelled from the program for playing too much Diablo and Warcraft.

  54. Netflix by Foerstner · · Score: 1

    So long as Netflix still uses the US Postal Service, the mail will be a safe method for shipping pirated DVDs.

    Can you imagine the stink the Netflix lawyers would raise if every one of their shipments started being intercepted?

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
    1. Re:Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine the stink the Netflix lawyers would raise if every one of their shipments started being intercepted?

      Can you imagine the size of the ass Netflix can kiss if the MPAA pulls industry muscle to shut down their entire business?

      Seriously, this line of thinking that a certain company will stop it has never, ever, worked in any other situation in the past, why would you think it would now?

    2. Re:Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Netflix would thank them, because Netflix could blame the post office for the throttling of Netflix accounts.

  55. If DVDs are like drugs.... by Trelane · · Score: 1

    Then so much of the latest stuff has been a bad batch....

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  56. MPAA Dogs by fh8510 · · Score: 1

    Those MPAA Dogs!!

  57. and DRM 'em while yer at it... by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shipping them in unmarked cases is a start, but to really guarantee the items against confiscation, they'd just need to add a holographic "This is a DRM Anti-Piracy Copyright Protection Seal" label on the seam of each case. At that point, the mere discussion of how to circumvent said label & gain unauthorized access to the contents would be a class C felony.

    1. Re:and DRM 'em while yer at it... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      I think a Sony style rootkit on the DVD would also be funny, along with a good collection of some of the nastiest malware available to *help* the rootkit along.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:and DRM 'em while yer at it... by muridae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be very interesting, putting a backdoor trojan on a dvd and adding an autorun.inf. Reminds me of a post someone made about the CEH 312-50 study disc on a pirate website.

      Then again, would shipping a DVD loaded with trojans and backdoor programs count as transporting a weapon of mass (data) destruction?

    3. Re:and DRM 'em while yer at it... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      they'd just need to add a holographic "This is a DRM Anti-Piracy Copyright Protection Seal" label on the seam of each case.

      Paid with OUR taxes, of course! :-(

      *Puts on asbesto suit*
      Correction: With YOUR taxes, I live outside the US! :D

    4. Re:and DRM 'em while yer at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Put a tiny label somewhere on the CD saying "Malware and virus samples for antivirus research purposes" in a 1.5 point font, virtually hidden by the big 16-point one with "Lesbian Schoolgirls" on it. Then it becomes their fault for putting it into the drive, because as any lawyer will tell you, you should always read the small print.

    5. Re:and DRM 'em while yer at it... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Now we just need home versions of those "disposable" dvd's that become unreadable 24 hours after they're first played. They open and play my vacation DVD, and by the time it makes it to my house it's degraded due to the access at Fedex.

      Frivilous litigation here I come!! ;)

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:and DRM 'em while yer at it... by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... and who needs to watch the DVD anyway? If they make lots of cool smoke when they self destruct, that's entertainment enough right there.

  58. Read the terms of service... by rev_media · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't ever ship with fedex, but I'm pretty sure the form you sign when you send a package states that your package may be inspected for ANY reason. I ship to Canada quite a bit and have had several packages delayed because of customs inspections. It's interesting that the MPAA can just walk into an airport and open up packages. Just shows you how much control they have on an international scale...

    --
    http://www.revmediaphotography.com
    1. Re:Read the terms of service... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      UK customs agents actually opened the packages, not MPAA goons. The MPAA provided/trained the dogs. Customs agents can open any damn thing they like, for no given reason. The package just has to be present in the customs hall to qualify for opening.

  59. New product oppurtunity ;) by rts008 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After the initial WTF?!?!, the first thought that popped into my head was of an incident that occured in W. Germany, 1979 while I was stationed there (US Army).
    We (us hash smokers) had a contact in the MP detatchment that would alert us when they were going to bring the dogs in the barracks for *surprise* drug sniffing ops. Usually we would just consume all substances before they got there. One time my team mate got an idea....
    We used Johnson's Paste Wax (tm) on our barracks floors (as required) to keep it nice and shiny, the barracks used steam radiators for heat, which we would set the can of wax on to soften it for easier application. ..."what if we melt the wax, crumble up oh, say about 10 grams of hash into the melted wax, then heavily wax the floors?"

    Well, overkill being one of my team's trademarks, it ended up we mixed 30 grams of some really good "bubblegum black" hash into the wax, used the whole can on the entryway floor, and buffed.

    The MP's and two dogs showed up about half an hour later- the dogs went NUTS!
    They both went running around in little circles howling and whining for about 30 seconds, then bolted for the door trying to exit the barracks, the MP's could not gain control and had to let them out of the building.

    Several of the remaining MP's made a search, but could not find anything. :)

    Later on our contact told us that whatever we did totally burnt out the two dogs- they were worthless as "sniffing" dogs after that and were put on patrol duty. We never did tell him what we had done. (I use the term contact because he was one of our suppliers- we got most of our hash from such MP's!)

    Now, off to my lab to synth some "Pirated DVD Smell" to spray on ALL of my mail/packages! Muuhahhaahhaaahhaa ;)

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  60. Change of Media? by monopole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do I smell a transition to DivX/XviD based CDs. Or just a lot of flash media which happens to have DivX/XviD content encoded on a one time pad?

    Seriously, if they make possesion of a DVD tantamount to piracy, force people to show all of their DVDs including the naughty ones, they will simply force a transition to other less controllable physical media. Couple that with the nascent clusterfsck which HD-DVD and BluRay is becoming and you have a total loss of control over media and distribution which is the ony justification for the MPAA!

  61. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious stealth acronym

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the kind of person who needs jokes explained to him, aren't you?

  62. I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As the title says, I honestly doubt this is legal in the US. The mere existance of a DVD doesn't constitute probable cause.

    I don't recall signing any contract with FedEx that says they can search my goods, but even if I did the Constitution trumps that. I haven't got a problem with them opening it for technical reasons (repacking a mangled package, perhaps, which I'd accept gladly), but opening them for the purposes of determing if you've broken some law probably won't pass 4th Amendment muster.

    As a positive example, while I'm not a fan of the drug war, a trained drug dog identifying a package as containing an illegal drug would probably be probable cause, because whatever small quantity of legal cocaine in the country (for research), if any, is unlikely to be sent through FedEx. But the mere existance of a DVD is nowhere near probable cause by any reasonable standard; I can't imagine that anything but the vast majority of optical media going through Fedex is perfectly legal.

    However, my guess is the MPAA knows this, and this is a publicity stunt only.

    (Finally, I'm not a dog, but I wouldn't be surprised they're not smelling DVDs so much as the packaging they usually come in, which has that New Plastic smell so strongly a human might be able to do this. If so, this is almost funny, because they'll never come up with the illegal DVDs that way. It'd depend on the training, and we don't have enough data to be sure either way.)

    1. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't recall signing any contract with FedEx that says they can search my goods, but even if I did the Constitution trumps that. I haven't got a problem with them opening it for technical reasons (repacking a mangled package, perhaps, which I'd accept gladly), but opening them for the purposes of determing if you've broken some law probably won't pass 4th Amendment muster.

      The Constitution is, of course, a document limiting the power of the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment applied those same provisions to the states.

      You do not, however, have a Constitutional right for me, as a private citizen, not to go through your desk drawers. Might other laws apply? Yes, but it's not a Constitutional issue.*

      What does that mean? It means if FedEx--a private company--and the MPAA--also a private group**--decide to open your packages, your only recourses are to find another carrier or try your hand at a civil suit. I'm not sure one would fly, but it's your Consitutional right to try.

      It gets hairy about what they do if they find something. I am not a lawyer, and I am not sure if the police (or FBI or DEA or what have you) could use evidence obtained in this manner if it were illegal. I still do not think it is, however.

      This would be vastly different if it were the MPAA and the USPO, which is a government entity. Then all of your Constitutional protections would unequivically apply.

      * Interestingly, some courts seem to be extending privacy concepts, such as reasonable expectation of privacy, to personal situations--business in particular. I would support such laws or amendments, but I don't think they're there right now and I think extending the Fourth Amendment to private entities is a bit of a stretch.

      ** Since the movie industry seems to have special legal protections (what other form of copyright infringement is a federal crime enforcable by the FBI?), I would be curious to see it go to court as to whether or not they are truly a private entity.

    2. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Bringing up the constitution in a civil matter is nonsense. That's like saying the NDA you signed is invalid because of the first amendment. The Constitution is a set of rules (and limits) to our government. Fedex, not being part of the legislative, judicial or executive branches is not subject to that. Basically, Fedex has to sign a contract or make some statement that they WONT search your goods or turn them over to the feds before you can even claim to be harmed by the action.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't recall signing any contract with FedEx that says they can search my goods

      Sigh. By handing your goods over to them, you agreed to exactly such a contract. See http://www.fedex.com/us/services/intl/ground.html and follow the link for FedEx Ground Tariff. Buried deep in the Customs area is this:

      "Inspection of Shipments. FedEx Ground, or its agents or brokers, may open and inspect any or all packages in a shipment at any time. This action may be initiated by FedEx Ground or at the request of government authorities."

      It's put there so people think it only applies to stuff going through customs, but the description doesn't restrict it like that so anything goes. You can be sure there are similar statements in all the other shipping services. The fact that people believe they have government mandated privacy rights when handing things over to a commerical 3rd party amuses me. FedEx can do whatever the hell they want with your package, and the worst you can do to them is try to get back your declared value by following their claim procedure. You have no guarantee of privacy whatsoever when sending things through them.

    4. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by Jerf · · Score: 1

      But they're not just "going through my desk drawers" with my permission. They are searching for the purpose of determining if a crime has been committed. Unlike the First, the Fourth has nothing nothing about it only applying to the government.

    5. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't recall signing any contract with FedEx that says they can search my goods

      Sigh. By handing your goods over to them, you agreed to exactly such a contract.

      But, by receiving my goods, they agreed to a contract to pay me a million dollars. Oh, I get it. Only big corporations are allowed to do crap like that.

    6. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by Hatta · · Score: 1

      FedEx can do whatever the hell they want with your package, and the worst you can do to them is try to get back your declared value by following their claim procedure. You have no guarantee of privacy whatsoever when sending things through them.

      Ironically, you're safer from government intrusion if you use the government's postal service. They can't open USPS packages without probable cause and a warrant.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:I honestly doubt this is legal in the US by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      The entire document is about limiting (and defining, which imposes other limits) the federal government. Even when they leave powers to the states (10th) or people (9th), it's a limit on federal power. Defining job criteria is just about the only thing that comes to mind that is a stretch to fit to that idea. It was not even intended to apply to the states--and if memory serves, was specifically NOT applied to the states--for a long time (until after the 14th).

  63. tampered with / hair on package by bob122989 · · Score: 1

    i'm allergic to dogs, so i can't have packages be handled by a bunch of blo.. i mean, DVD sniffing K-9's and go on with business like usual. i'd start sneezing everytime i get a package in the mail.

  64. Dogg Rights Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Snoop Dogg has got an copyright/patent infringement case here. RIAA vs MPAA death match.

  65. Here is what you do by AnyThingButWindows · · Score: 1

    Find a friend in another state that will be in on it. (This is Slashdot, I know its hard.) And print a bunch of fake plastic movie labels and slide them in on the outside of the plastic DVD boxes. Make the labels say stuff like. "Scary Movie 4", and "Big Momma's House". Insert burned DVD with a obscene Anti-MPAA video message on it that encourages piracy. Put a movie label on the DVD, then insert into plastic box. Close box and put clear plastic tape on the outside of the DVD container making it a complete bitch to open them. Insert a binding license agreement on the back of the box that says. "By opening this container, you agree to the licensing terms herein". Licence each DVD box at $800.

    Ship.
    ???
    Profit !!!

    --
    When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. - Jefferson
  66. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > slip a blank ( convienently labeled, "MI-III" ) with everything they ship

    Instead of sending a blank, why not just burn 9.4GB of /dev/urandom onto the disk. They'll probably end up spending over $10,000 per package by calling in the MPAA, the RIAA, the NSA, the CIA, and the DHS. After a few dozen false alarms, maybe they'll learn to stop invading customer privacy.

  67. trojan horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just drop a dvd with a virus on it in the mail along with your packages.

  68. No way this is happening. by nsmike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FedEx was glad to help out on the test, I'm sure, but there's no way FedEx is going to let these dogs sniff every package.

    I worked at a FedEx sort facility as a package handler for a few months, and I'll tell you right now, those packages sit still for a total of 5 seconds once those trailers are opened. They go from the trailer to the belt, to the package handler, to the drivers, in the truck and out the door. No drivers are going to stand there and let a dog sniff out every package for a potential DVDs, especially if they have an appointment delivery to keep.

    I can remember mornings when trailers were late in getting to the terminal by five minutes and those drivers were whining so much it wasn't even funny. Now, I suppose they could be sniffed at some other point, but any delay will smear FedEx's "The World on Time" image. They're not going to be willing to do that, nor any other shipping company.

    Besides, if they do cooperate, just ship it through the mail, or UPS, or DHL.

    Not that I condone in any way the illegal distribution of copied movies.

    Not that I condone the invasion of privacy either.

    It's just a lose-lose situation all around.

    1. Re:No way this is happening. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Well said. There's a reason companies like FedEx have "special relationships" with the worlds custom agents. For example, FedEx will automatically pay customs duty (here in the UK) and bill the customer directly. This enables them to get their shipments through customs quickly and on to your doorstep.

      When I used to import DVDs (for personal viewing, not trade), I avoided companies like FedEx because of this. You were guaranteed getting hit with import taxes every time.

      The idea that they would work together to slow down shipments is a bit unlikely, though perhaps they would only use it with packages coming from monitored sources as opposed to random checks.

  69. Monty Python?? by raftpeople · · Score: 1

    I can just see "Inspector Leopard of Scotland Yard, Special Fraud Film Director Squad" focusing on the clearly fraudulent shipment of DVD's that the dog has identified, while the crate marked "Warning: Illegal Terrorist Shipment" slides slowly down the conveyor completely unnoticed.

  70. Stupid dogs by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't even know the difference between a CD and a DVD.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  71. Solution by 42Penguins · · Score: 1

    In other news, a recent trend is appearing amongst FedExers to insert a doggie treat into each package they ship. The cause is unknown.

  72. This makes me wonder... by Compuser · · Score: 1

    are DVDs chemically stable? I mean if even factory-burned discs give off
    enough fumes to be detected by dogs then there is no way I would trust
    this medium for my archival purposes. I want something that is inert
    and stable.

  73. Think Brown by Hobbes897 · · Score: 1

    UPS, on the other hand, remains friendly to software pirates worldwide.

    --
    Normality is now: overrated.
  74. one bluetooth per dog keeps bluray's away by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 1

    or was ot an apple a day keeps the dog's away... ? :)

  75. TCP for dogs by Sathias · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know they will be sending their dogs on TCP/IP courses so they can packet-sniff ISPs for illegal torrent data.

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  76. P2P by slashflood · · Score: 1

    By the way: here is the MPAA sniffing dog for P2P networks.

  77. even I can smell a DVD by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    it's a strong, distinctive smell. Of course dogs can pick it up.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  78. Legality by udjet · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be agaist the law if they open a package that does not contain anything illegal? It is after all a federal offense to tamper with someones mail. Not sure if this is extended to Fed Ex, UPS, et al. In the US at least...

  79. I'm glad I'm not British... by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny
    FTFA: packages containing DVDs, which were opened and checked by HM Customs' representatives


    If I were paying Her Majesty's taxes I would be really pissed off if my public servants were wasting their time in the service of the MPAA...

  80. Quick someone send a few hundred.... by 3seas · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...ubuntu live cds thru fedex.

    Either they will claim it's piracy or better, use them to replace their windows systems.

    This only proves that distribution doesn't cost so much after all.

    1. Re:Quick someone send a few hundred.... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Nahhh, add an AOL CD to every package you send out.

  81. Contact FedEx! by paulzeye · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sent a comment to FedEx at from this page
    https://www.fedex.com/cgi-bin/qrf2.cgi?link=4&firs t=y&formpage=general
    on their website. This is an important topic, and people should let them know how they feel about it. Please take some time to leave an intelligent comment about this issue.

  82. How we can fight back... by ImaNihilist · · Score: 1

    You know, if this ever started really being practiced, everyone on Slashdot should burn pirated movies and spam them to all the MPAA executives via USPS. Then each executive can have a massive pile of at least 100,000 pirated DVDs at their door. That would be awesome. Maybe mix it up with some Ubuntu DVDs.

  83. Looks like I need more diplomatic pouches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they won't be able to open those, and the consulate can distribute my wares like they've been doing in the past. Now, where's that Post Anonymously box...

  84. In some countries... by Marsmensch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... you have to pay customs to watch your media.

    In Chile it used to be so that if the customs people at the airport found a video tape or DVD in your luggage, it was retained for a couple of days so they could check it for illegal porn, or forbidden movies (like the last temptation of Christ). To recover your material you had to go pick it up at the customs office (which was a major pain in the ass if you planned on leaving the city where you entered the country in your first few days here), and pay a "viewing fee". In other words, they passed the cost of someone viewing your stuff onto you.

    I don't know what the situation is now,though. I haven't heard of this being applied in the last few years.

    --
    Slashdot: news from nerds.
    1. Re:In some countries... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Canadian customs is good like that.
      I ordered a T-shirt from the states. I was charged $2 in GST on import, plus $5 "handling fee" for them to charge me $2.

    2. Re:In some countries... by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      at least they aren't charging you for the popcorn too.

    3. Re:In some countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shiiiit. I wonder what would happen if I pointed out that my 300 gig laptop drive could have some "illegal porn" on it... they'd have to watch about 200 gigabytes of low-resolution porno vids/jpgs to see if any of it's illegal. :)
      It'd paralyse their entire countries immigration process!

  85. More importantly by edwardpickman · · Score: 0

    Can they sniff out bad movies? A lot of sequels and Adam Sandler films are sneaking past customs. If they can train them to sniff out copies of Basic Instinct II a lot of needless suffering could be avoided. As bad as some of these stinkers smell a dog with a headcold should be able to sniff them out from across the street.

  86. Training cost of next generation dogs by alexandrecc · · Score: 1

    The training cost for the next generation of dogs should be higher. They'll need to train them both for the HD-DVD and the Blu-Ray disc if they want to be effective until we get a new standard. But as a reference to a recent subject, maybe these dogs will promote the new standard instead of the game consoles. The one standard who smells the worst should win the battle because it will limit optimally the piracy. Then I now understand why HD-DVD should win.

    --
    For(k;;)(Fork();)
  87. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see loads of potential for amusement in NSW. They use sniffer dogs here to detect people who might be carrying drugs in public.

    I'm sure some enterprising janitor could use some interesting additives in whatever they use to clean the railway station concourse and then watch the fun...

    C'mon, I'm not proposing anything here, it's just too obvious.

  88. Re:ESR sniffs too... by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

    Incorrect. That's like saying your problem with O.J. Simpson is that he can get away with murder and you can't. Your problem is really that he shouldn't (commit murder in O.J.'s case, be a grandstanding ass in Raymond's); you don't want to in the first place.

  89. In other news, the Catholic church has also traine by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    In other news, the Catholic church has also trained dogs for inspecting bags, not for DVDs but for condoms.

    A church official said that they want to make sure that sinners do not attend church.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  90. What about pepper??? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Really, even I can smell an awful ammonia smell whenever I open up my spindle of CDR's but I know if you put cayenne pepper where a dog has to smell, that kills them quite quickly when done regularly. My grandparents dog came up their porch and pee-ed all over it all the time. They used cayenne pepper and after about a week the dog had his 4 paws in the air.

    Go to the bulk barn and get black pepper (still in tact, not ground up already) and an assortment of chillie peppers, cayanne peppers, and anything else that makes your eyes water when you open the big bulk lids! When you get home, grind up the black peppers as you use them (they will be fresher and more effective). Mix the black and various other peppers together in a sandwich bag, and then spread it in your garden wherever the dogs/cat go. They always sniff first, and they will get a nose full of pepper and go away unhappy. You will have to repaet every few days for about two week. The dogs remember not to go to your lawn because of the peppers after a few times. You will end up spending as little as $5.00 or less. A little goes a long way.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  91. Re: Better than sending a blank... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    Would be to send a slideshow of The Best Of Goatse Add a Sony Rootkit for extra fun.

  92. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the most effective strategy would be to burn actual movies whose copyright has expired from archive.org and labeling them something like btlegmovrip3241.avi. Imagine how much fun they would have trying to determine the copyright status of all these movies.

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  93. Oh, that's precious by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    What brain dead market droid at FedEx thought it would be a good idea to stage a public event with the MPAA? What win is going to come out of that for FedEx?

    FedEx: We let everyone with an issue and their dog sniff your packages! And we open them up and look inside if the dog thinks it smells something!

    FedEx: We definitely didn't think this one through!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  94. this will bust my balls... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    I send DVD-Rs with Knoppix Linux on them to public schools. I will not be able to use Fed Ed.

    This is the equivalent of an organized crime family that sells magazines bribing the US Mail to confiscate their competitors magazines from the Mail.

    I am sending a certified mail letter to Fed Ex explaining why neither I, nor the university I teach at will EVER use Fed Ex to send our research results again.

    It's more and more clear that Fed Ex wants to stop all university research, and all FOSS.

    Andy Out!

  95. Probable Cause? by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So if I ship my DVDs in a netflix enevelope wil they opne them. If they play them to see what they contain are they violating thr DRM? Do they he probable cause to perform this search?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Probable Cause? by Zordak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know what the law is in Great Britain, but in the United States, you do not need probable cause for a dog to sniff a bag (at least for drugs--I'm not aware of any court that has tested DVD sniffs). Also, this is not a government search. At best, this is a private tort, and presumably FedEx gets your permission to search your packages when you sign that little shipping form full of small print.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:Probable Cause? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm from Memphis, where the Fedex world hub is located. I have several friends that work at the hub and often report the Feds (FBI, DEA, etc) letting dogs randomly sniff through lots of packages. These are drug dogs searching for contraband, not bomb dogs, which would kind of be understandable considering these packages are air freight. Why is a company like Fedex, letting it's customers privacy rights be trampled on by government and third party PRIVATE organizations? What do they have to gain? I just don't understand.

    3. Re:Probable Cause? by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      Just sticking with the Empire.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    4. Re:Probable Cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. The search was done by HM Revenue and Customs. FedEx cannot stop them searching the packages. Yes, the dogs were trsined and owned by FACT (the Federation Against Copyright Theft), as part of a project promoted by the MPAA, who were working with HM Revenue and Customs. What do you expect them to do when it is a government organisation performing the search?

    5. Re:Probable Cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have several friends that work at the hub and often report the Feds (FBI, DEA, etc) letting dogs randomly sniff through lots of packages. These are drug dogs searching for contraband,

      Same thing happens at UPS. And the Feds don't need a warrent to open the package, UPS will open it for them.

      I'd be interested to know if the same thing happens at the US Postal Service. I'd wager that USPS wouldn't allow the MPAA to walk their dogs thru sniffing packages. I'm inclined to think the Feds would need a warrent to search/open USPS packages, no idea about sniffing packages.

      Why is a company like Fedex, letting it's customers privacy rights be trampled on by government and third party PRIVATE organizations? What do they have to gain?

      People don't generally care, so the major shippers aren't really risking anything by allowing it. By allowing Federal agencies to walk their dogs thru they gain goodwill and by allowing private third parties to walk their dogs thru they probably get paid.

    6. Re:Probable Cause? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      All non-domestic packages can be subject to dogs
      searching for contraband (it's the law. FedEx can't fly a
      plane out of the country without getting customs to sign off
      on EVERY package in the plane). FedEx, UPS, USPS, DHL all
      have customs personnel with dogs at their facilities. They
      have to if they want to get packages cleared by customs
      efficiently (in hours, not days).

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    7. Re:Probable Cause? by shystershep · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You handed your package off to a third-party: you don't have any privacy right in it. Especially when you consider that (in the fine print) you expressly gave FedEx, UPS, etc., permission to open that package. The only things you have any privacy right in are those that you keep under your control. Once you put those things out where the public can get to them, or even worse, give control of it to a third-party, you might as well take a out full-page ad in the NY Times for all the good it's going to do you to gripe about someone looking in your package.

      The problem isn't that these companies are 'trampling' over anyone's privacy rights. The problem is that most people have no idea what their rights really are, and just assume that anything they don't like violates those rights.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    8. Re:Probable Cause? by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Search and seizure is the law, not matter what silly crap is in a contract it cannot ever over rule a law. At no stage ever will a private security guard ever have more power than the lowliest law enforement officer regardles of the silly nonsence some shyster corporate lawyer comes up with or tries to claim.

      Sure they bluff and try to get away with all sorts of illegal crap but as often happens when people stand up to them and fight for their rights they corporations gets what it deserve, well at least they settle out of court for some huge undisclosed sum.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Probable Cause? by Benzido · · Score: 1

      Actually, the MPAA officers are not cops. They are the representatives of a private trade federation. That's why they have to bring a civil lawsuit against you for 'stealing' dvds.

      So no matter how much probable cause they have, it would still be illegal for them to search your mail. And it would be completely illegal for fedex to allow them to do so.

    10. Re:Probable Cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that this is taking place at Customs. The government has the right to open and inspect ANYTHING physically coming across its borders; probable cause is not needed. Dogs, x-rays, and so on are just ways of increasing the probability of finding 'contraband', since physically inspecting everything is not efficient, let alone possible. We cross the border from Canada all the time; they will do a detailed search of your car based soley on whether they've done 'enough' random seaches that hour; in the immediate post 9/11 time they did try 100% inspection, and the line at the Detroit-Windsor bridge and tunnel stretched 20 miles.

    11. Re:Probable Cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in the US, anything you send overseas is subject to customs enforcement and that has been set in law for a pretty long time and supported by the courts.

      In the case of FedEx, I'm sure they have clauses in their shipping agreeements to allow for opening of packages you ship thru them. FedEx is a corporation, not the government. You are not protected by the bill of rights in this instance.

    12. Re:Probable Cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the dogs may be officers. If you attack a police dog (why in the world would you want to, Angel Dust aside), it's considered assault on an officer. I wonder if they're retired.

      Of course, how a dog could file for a search warrant is beyond me...

    13. Re:Probable Cause? by Jerim · · Score: 1

      The thing with that is that I don't think anyone has a problem with FedEx, UPS or any other company having that clause in their policies. Every company needs to protect themselves. I won't deny a company the right to use a policy in rare cases.

      However, what I do fault them for is abusing that policy. Putting it right up in your face and saying "Look at the power we have!" is not the best way to win over customers. Why do they need to come out in such a manner and make a public statement about going through packages. Just search them when you need to and take appropriate action. Don't wag the finger at everyone.

      There are all kinds of things in pretty much every contract you ever sign that basically says that you have no rights and the company has all the rights. However, companies very rarely excercise that right for fear of driving customers away.

      The problem here is the trust between the two parties. I understand any company needs to protect itself from legal action and thus they include all kinds of crazy off the wall clauses. At the same time, I trust the company to be very diligent in using that right. FedEx is basically not exercising any restraint.

      FedEx should be more concerned about respecting customer privacy and less about scaring people.

    14. Re:Probable Cause? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Fedex did not do the search. Fedex, not wanting its packages to be put in the slow lane at Customs, cooperated with HM Customs and Excise in testing a proposed innovation brought to their attention by the MPAA. It is thus a government search but no different than warrantless government searches done by customs men for millenia. Border guards have been inspecting goods at the border for longer than than there have been guaranteed rights.

    15. Re:Probable Cause? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      However, what I do fault them for is abusing that policy. Putting it right up in your face and saying "Look at the power we have!"

      I don't think they're abusing their policy, they're using it proactively. If they let the DEA's dogs sniff out the packages there will never be reason for a DEA agent with probabale cause and a warrant to come in and shut down their hub for a few hours... Which would probably happen pretty frequently.

      FedEx should be worried about covering their ass, not about covering your ass. I'm sure they don't want the customers that are shipping illegal items anyway. Why should they incur the risk? They probably want to scare off those people.

    16. Re:Probable Cause? by jackl420 · · Score: 1

      A number of common carriers, including UPS, FedEx, Amtrak and Trailways have been reported to have "bounty" deals with the US drug enforcement agencies (DEA, ICE) where the companies get a ~10- 15% bounty on the value of a seizure of drugs or the "laundered" money used to purchase them.

      Whether the employees are incentivized to narc out the shipping customers is unknown, but it would be reasonable to suspect that if the companies receive a bounty for being government agents, the employees are encouraged to help out.

      You are correct about drug dogs being used in package shipping hubs. There have been a number of reported instances of FedEx deliveries being converted into "sting" operation busts, often with the claim that the package "broke open" during shipping which was how the employees were alerted.

      I don't have the time to do the research on this now to provide links and support for what I'm saying, but if you go over to the Media Awareness Program site, www.mapinc.org/find and search back for stories involving Federal Express, UPS or Greyhound, you will find the stories.

      Interestingly, many ppl have been caught by erroneously assuming private carriers such as UPS will guard the customers' privacy rights more than the "government-controlled" Postal Service. Actually, this is wrong. While postal inspectors have no fondness for mailing contraband items, there is no economic bounty incentive as with the private carriers, and the privacy laws and expectations governing mail privacy are generally stricter than the private carriers.

  96. show them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a fan of content piracy, but the MPAA is dumb and aggrivating, so I'm going to suggest that everyone should start enclosing some completely legal (and really cheap -- like a bad movie or a coaster) with every package that they send that might go through a location that has these dogs.
    When the MPAA quits acting like they are special (and bullies at the same time) and start trying stuff that makes sense many people will respect them. They are just so retarded right now.

  97. What a load of crap by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    Its all fear, they train one or two show pony sniffer dogs and get into the News... Planting the seeds of doubt... "Oh NOES!! I can't send Pirate DVDs! the doggies will catch me!"

    What a load of ass, the number of dogs, the number of false positives,.. Its just not viable on a wide scale ...

    What are the dogs sniffing out? Inks? plastics? Will they train them to detect every brand of media? Will they retrain when a new format comes out?

    This is a joke.

  98. Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The media companies are in cahoots with the celery people to rule the world!

    But seriously, I too had the same odd realization that my discs smelled strongly of celery...

  99. Sniff proofing? by olenikm · · Score: 1

    Can it really be hard to get your hands on a few sheets of a non-permeable plastic sheet and a plastic welder? Bam, hermetically sealed cargo - dogs got nothin'. Save for residual odors, but if you're careful, it's not a problem.

  100. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by wes33 · · Score: 0
    Instead of sending a blank, why not just burn 9.4GB of /dev/urandom onto the disk. They'll probably end up spending over $10,000 per package by calling in the MPAA, the RIAA, the NSA, the CIA, and the DHS. After a few dozen false alarms, maybe they'll learn to stop invading customer privacy.

    Why do you think it is legal to attempt to interfere with and impede the operations of the US Customs? Do you think it is that easy to slip away from your Government's power over you?
  101. MPAA needs by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    MPAA needs dogs that can detect the smell of crappy movies.

    1. Re:MPAA needs by klang · · Score: 1

      They do. RTFA. .. the dog find's DVDs, nuff said.

  102. Ummm tempting as it is by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As tempting as it is to send DVDs that have firmware upgrades for players, etc. or just random noise there is a downside. The false positive insures an opened package and as I learned this Christmas sending a stuffed suitcase through customs, not all inside made it back in afer inspection, curiously the canned crab went missing, and they are not real smart. They opened the sealed package of dog treats in one bag. In another they punched a hole through the bag of coffee (coffee is often used to mask drugs, now the dogs sniff out coffee too) instead of just unfolding the top like a normal person who has seen a store ground coffee bag. And when they repacked the cases they didn't bother to pad the Christmas ornaments (small ones for a small tree) they packed a now unwrapped bottle of wine next to the now unpadded glass ornaments. Needless to say Christmas carnage ensued. So maybe think twice about just what packages you ship with a blank CD inside. Oh, and if you do, think about using hot melt glue to bond the disc to the box. "But you really shouldn't do that!"(TM)

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  103. Let me get this straight... by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're planning on opening fedex packages up which they believe to contain DVDs without any other reason to suspect that illegal copies of a DVD is being mailed? I feel that's kind of wrong, for someone to go through my mail or packages just because I ordered some DVDs online (maybe even foreign DVDs I can't get in the states).

    Doesn't the law require them to actually have a high probability of some offence before they're allowed to open packages to check its contents.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is these companies regularly open up all packages and even steal their contents from time to time!

    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by repvik · · Score: 1

      "Doesn't the law require them to actually have a high probability of some offence before they're allowed to open packages to check its contents."

      No. To quote the fedex site: "Inspection of Shipments. FedEx Ground, or its agents or brokers, may open and inspect any or all packages in a shipment at any time. This action may be initiated by FedEx Ground or at the request of government authorities."
      They just don't check each and every package, because that'd take way too much resources.

  104. Smell Test by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Seriously, this is like training drug dogs to find plastic bags."

    Excellent analogy that punches through the clouds that the "Terror War" have cast on our sense of personal violation by the state.

    Corporate globalism, with no basis in justice or recognition of any rights beyond corporate property, means everyone is guilty until proven not liable by a corporate lawyer. Accusation = proof, just like medieval faith governments.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Smell Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read less Chompsky.

    2. Re:Smell Test by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      personal violation by the state

      So MPAA belongs to that state now?

      That is what I'm worried about.

      That an organization fighting for a noble goal suddenly is a body functioning a bit like the FBI in their abilities to search packages without police warrants or suspicions of crime.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Smell Test by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Get outside into the world more sometime, Anonymous Coward. BTW, that's "Chomsky" - you can't even bash intelligently. Betcha you're planning to vote for Bush again in November.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Smell Test by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Our sense of personal violation by the state, as in airport/border searches without probable cause, reasonable suspicion, or any evidence, has been clouded by insecurity rationalizations without actual justification. We had that sense - now it's clouded by relentless propaganda and fearmongering. FedEx is exploiting that clouded sense to invade our privacy on behalf of the MPAA.

      FWIW, under fascism - the merger of corporate and government power - the state and the corporation are indistinguishable.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Smell Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, anyone who doesn't share your paranoid ravings MUST be a corporate lackey bush voter. Grow up.

    6. Re:Smell Test by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I win again. Now the Anonymous jerk Cowards who argue the excluded middle are running from Bush at top speed. Revenge is sweet.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Smell Test by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
          100% Flamebait

      Another victory: Anonymous TrollMod Cowards prove where the opposition lies: in the gutter.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  105. in soviet russia . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVD's sniff you

  106. There's an easy counter-measure to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Every time you ship something by FedEx, drop in an old AOL CD or a CD that you burned that you don't need anymore, etc. I throw away a dozen burnable CDs every month. Save them for FedEx! Even better, burn a DVD of your favorite Open Source software, like OpenOffice, Firefox, etc, and give a free gift to everyone you send FedEx to.

    On a related note, it would be a good idea for people to make up a "tincture of cannabis" type spray and use it on baggage, around customs areas, on packages, in mail boxes, on FedEx envelopes, etc. You would need to get some pot leaves (stuff that's not smokable would be fine), use it to infuse alcohol, and then dilute the alcohol with water, and you have a spray. It would not contain any active ingredient so it would be legal, and it's not a weapon, so there's really no problem with giving things a little "eau de pot".

    Ha ha, my Captcha image for this post is "copied".

    1. Re:There's an easy counter-measure to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Liek I just happen to have a bag of cabbage laying around. only premium bud for me, and I ain't wasting it um, what did you say, I can't be bothered. FUCK OFF!

  107. Send your love to the MPAA (email in PDF) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know that if you follow the link to the article on spacegrinder, you can download a PDF from the MPAA.org site (in case anyone still thinks it's a joke), and it contains the email address of the contact person at FACT? If I were this person, I should be living in terrible fear of having my emailbox slashdotted right about now.

    1. Re:Send your love to the MPAA (email in PDF) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's all just do that.

      His address is eddy.leviten@fact-uk.org.uk

      He's the FACT Head of Communications. Also can be reached via telephone @ 020 8568 6646 / 07768 057464

      You brits have an odd way of listing your telephone numbers..

  108. Time to gather up all those AOL CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just imagine - give everyone at the airport an AOL CD so they can
    put in their suite-case.

  109. or.... by jefu · · Score: 1

    How about installing a pirated, spyware ridden, bug infested, registry hacked, keystroke logging version of Windows?

    1. Re:or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that not the default Windows configuration?

    2. Re:or.... by wixardy · · Score: 1

      you mean what my grandmothers is like if i leave her alone for more than 5 mins?

    3. Re:or.... by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 1

      Well no. They're not pirated by default, but you can turn on pirate mode by pressing and holding f10 for 10 seconds when the CD boots up.

    4. Re:or.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I thought you had to hold down "R".

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  110. I switched to magnatune, where's magnamovie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched to listen to open music from magnatune.
    Now, where can I find an open content movie site, with stuff like documentaries, political comentaries, science shows, history, ...

    Since it seems like the MPAA is all about using strong arm tactics to get potentential customers to buy their stuff.

    PS, Is there any way we can reduce the copyright term from "life plus infinity" to something that makes sense?

  111. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A younger friend told me of a similar monkeywrenching episode at his HS. When word got out that the drug dogs were coming through, a few of the more politically aware stoners got together and sprayed the hallways, lockers, and other areas with dirty bongwater. Special attention was paid to the teacher's lounge and the administrative offices. :)

    When the dogs came through, they went absolutely apeshit and had to be removed, with no actual drugs being found. :)

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  112. Re:ESR sniffs too... by fishbowl · · Score: 0

    >Incorrect. That's like saying your problem with O.J. Simpson is that he can get away with murder and you can't.

    Asking for a prima donna rider for appearances is not murder.

    >you don't want to in the first place.

    Oh come now. EVERYBODY would like first class vip treatment.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  113. What about DVD detector vans? by andrewagill · · Score: 1

    Didn't the MPAA consider using detector vans, like when the BSA rolled out its pirate software detector vans? I hear you can get them real cheap from the Ministry of Housinge.

  114. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by JAFSlashdotter · · Score: 1

    Instead of sending a blank, why not just burn 9.4GB of /dev/urandom onto the disk. They'll probably end up spending over $10,000 per package by calling in the MPAA, the RIAA, the NSA, the CIA, and the DHS. After a few dozen false alarms, maybe they'll learn to stop invading customer privacy.

    Why do I have the depressing feeling that shipping 9.4GB of /dev/urandom out of the country to the UK qualifies as sending a one-time-crypto-pad out of the country, thus making you an arms dealer or terrorism suspect?
    --
    We apologize for the preceding message. All those responsible have been sacked.
  115. New training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you know it, they'll be training dogs to sniff out ass smells. We already know that they excel in this area already so it'll be a winning scenario for all!

  116. X-Ray by GumphMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Surely a bulk shipment of DVD/CD media will show up on X-ray machinery already in use? The X-ray machine doesn't need food or shelter, won't crap on the floor, and you already have trained operators. What have they gained here?

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    1. Re:X-Ray by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      What have they gained here?

      Probably a smug sense of satisfaction.

  117. mail hard drives, then by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    dvd's are SO low density.

    hard drives hold much much more data, anyway. plus, they don't have the sentiness* that the dogs look for in the dvds. I think I'll ship my pirated movies, from now on, in hard drive format. yeah, good idea.

    *stephen colbert can bite me!

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:mail hard drives, then by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Too big. Just get a decent sized flash drive and you're set :P

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  118. Re:ESR sniffs too... by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but not by being a jackass. Just like everyone wants vengeance, but not necessarily by murder.

  119. dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this from...a trainer, we'll leave it at that. They have ways to make dogs indicate a "hit", using body language or subtle hand movements, etc., that part varies. They use that "technique" all the time when they want to search a car for instance even when the dog doesn't have a legit "hit". Just one of the many ways they circumvent the real laws. Here's another, carrying a "throw away". They will have access to a confiscated firearm, if involved in "an unfortunate shooting when the perp made a threatening movement" they can stick the gun in his dead hands.

    They do stuff like that all the time.

    Anyway, I don't have a big problem with them finding legitimate counterfeit disks, indications of mass piracy for profit. There's an easier solution, a few nations specialise in that trade, the authorities know who they are. Stop trade with them, cut it off.

      The US and UK have borked their manufacturing base so much now through "globalism and wonderful 'free' trade" that they can't do that very effectively.

    The movie industry could cut "piracy" off overnight, they choose not to. Retail sell disks for a few dollars, which they could do. They would rather bitch, get new laws, and insist on a hugely jacked up artificial price that in no way reflects costs and a reasonable profit margin. They still want as much for a new release on disk as they charged for a new release on tape 10-15 years ago. I mean, c'mon now, it is MUCH cheaper to duplicate movies now, and the transportation/warehouse, etc costs are much lower, and cost of movie production has only gone up a little, nothing like what these prices represent compared to their past cost of actual physical production.

    In short, they have brainwashed themselves into believing their own bullshit. They honestly believe that 20 or 25 bucks for a quarter disk is a deal to the drooling masses. At three bucks they would sell BILLIONS of freaking disks. 3$ is an impulse item charge, people would be grabbing handfuls of them, not even bothering with most file trading or looking up "CD Leroy" at the flea market.

    People are just not that stupid or naieve about costs anymore, not when EVERYONE knows how cheap it is to make dupes. Cost of movie production today-not a lot different from ten years ago. It has gone up some, but not that much. They refuse to drop prices on their offerings though, flat out refuse. All they want is lock on advanced tech for themselves, they want you to keep paying like it's 1990 or something. THAT is what wrong with their current business model and why piracy and file sharing is so common now. People have little moral qualms over shafting the mafia if it looks like they can get away with it, and that's all the **AAs are, mafia goons masquerading as businessmen. The **AAs-the companies they represent-screw the talent, screw the customer, and screw each other, it is one of the most shameless corrupt and bogus industries out there.

    It's a cartel,and if that NY prosecutor always in the news wants to investigate price fixing,collusion, etc, he could start there with the DVD movie selling industry.

    Someone needs to smack the Hollywood dweebs with the reality cluestick and introduce them to the concept of "volume sales" and how "net" is more important than 'gross" and how "serve your customer" is a better idea than "gouge-shaft-screw and prosecute" your customer.

    They are so used to being in a scumbag industry and dealing with fellow scumbags and being around scumbags all day long they just ass-ume everyone is like that. And they wonder why people have so little respect for them or could give a care about their profits now.

    1. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by ClamIAm · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I know this from...a trainer, we'll leave it at that. They have ways to make dogs indicate a "hit", using body language or subtle hand movements, etc., that part varies. They use that "technique" all the time when they want to search a car for instance even when the dog doesn't have a legit "hit". Just one of the many ways they circumvent the real laws. Here's another, carrying a "throw away". They will have access to a confiscated firearm, if involved in "an unfortunate shooting when the perp made a threatening movement" they can stick the gun in his dead hands.

      Why not link to some credible sources, Mr. Anonymous? Sure, everybody has a friend who was fucked over because the cops bent or broke some law, but unless you can come up with some hard, documented evidence, your assertions here are baseless.

    2. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, I don't have a big problem with them finding legitimate counterfeit disks, indications of mass piracy for profit. There's an easier solution, a few nations specialise in that trade, the authorities know who they are. Stop trade with them, cut it off.

      Great idea. You would only have to cut off trade with two countries to eliminate 30% of world movie piracy.

      From the link:
      "The U.S. currently leads with about $1.311 billion lost to piracy. Despite all the hype about piracy in China, Russia and several other of the world's most notorious pirate markets, Mexico actually turns out the 2nd worst with $483 million lost to piracy."

      I agree with the rest of your post however and I think that the quote above shows some of the consequences of trying to force people to trade scotch for dirt.

    3. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Madre de dios...
      Por lo menos le partimos su madre a esos pinches chinos en algo.

      Y a rusia tambien.

    4. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not the OP

      You must not have dogs - it's really easy to do this kind of thing. I can make my dogs go crazy and think there is some one is at the door, just by closing the microwave a certain slow way, or go look for a 'treat' that I've 'thrown'. There's a million other things that dogs can be taught, some in mere minutes. I've taught one of my dogs to herd one of my cats inside, and I've taught my cat to come when I whistle.

      Now consider a well funded, motivated trainer, and a department, police or otherwise that would profit from seizures...

      Too many are only concerned with a 'bust', or harassing a perceived threat to their community, business, or political power - even when a 'threat' needs to be manufactured. I'm sure you can think of some examples of this... I raq my brain, and thought of a couple.

      http://rexcurry.net/drugdogsframe.html

      I'm sure if you look you can find some more.

    5. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Ours · · Score: 1

      Totally agreed.
      Except they aren't brainwashed by their own crap. It's just that they do it because they can. In the contries where industrial piracy is really big (say East Asia), the legit stuff is really cheap and at "impulsive" prices (well, for tourists, not necesserally the average Joe). At 12 euros for the latest PC game (original, legal copy) and less for a DVD movie, why bother downloading it? Heck, at those prices I'd take too, maybe three instead of having to make a choice. And I'd risk buying something that I'm 100% not sure I'll like.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    6. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Hey, nice flame!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      There's a number of TV series that I would gladly buy on DVD at the right price.

      But I'm just not going to spend £45 ($65) for a DVD box set of Dr Who Series 1. Get real. You put it on TV for free. Make it something like £10-15 and I'll pay it. I'm not pirating it, I'm just not watching it. I'm doing something else with my money instead.

      If the TV series were less than £10, I'd be filling my shelves with them. I'd have S1 of Lost, S1+S2 of Nip/Tuck, 4 series of The Sopranos, Jeeves and Wooster, all of South Park, some Futurama, and some Simpsons. I'd put down something like £200 down for that lot. stuff that's costing the production companies something like £10-20 to produce in total. Instead, I consider it a bad bargain and go and spend my money elsewhere.

    8. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by john83 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...At three bucks they would sell BILLIONS of freaking disks. 3$ is an impulse item charge, people would be grabbing handfuls of them, not even bothering with most file trading or looking up "CD Leroy" at the flea market.

      People are just not that stupid or naieve about costs anymore, not when EVERYONE knows how cheap it is to make dupes...
      They wouldn't sell billions. In fact, I doubt they'd increase sales enough to even come close to making what they do now. That would be okay though for most movies, but it's hard to convince people that cutting their profit margin is sensible (even if it'll help revitalise the industry). The blockbusters, the ones they spend more than $100,000,000 on making, they'd find it tougher to pay for those. Still, if it was $3 for a decent small film, and $10 for Tom Cruise's latest heap of shit, they'd probably start recognising that there's value in making a good small-budget movie. I wish I could see it happening.
      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    9. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Couldnt agree more, thats why the only TV series I own is Stargate as they sell for around £22 on amazon.co.uk, I find that to be a fair price. I would never pay above £30 for a season, no matter how good it is.

    10. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fact: Sniffer dogs can't work 8 hour days, figure two hours per dog max. To them, sniffing is a game, and they get bored, well, it the game gets boring, performance drops.
      They may smell a type of plastic, but they sure dont know whats on on it.

      Go figure how they will react to magazine giveaways, or a Sunday newspaper insert.

      There is nothing in it for shareholders - dogs are an expense, that don't add to the bottom line, unless to satisfy token regulative requirements. So the article is blustering. Plus overworked dogs will fake 'hits' to get a reward. Yes, the dogs are as intelligent as the gorillas on the x-ray machines - all show and NNNN for brains.

    11. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Is it down to 12 euros? When I was in France in december of 2001 I saw Quake (3?) going for about 45 euros (though it was in francs - the exchange was frozen at that point).

      Heck, I buy games (used, mostly) at that price point all the time from Game Crazy, Game Stop, etc. I hardly ever go over $30 for a game. iTunes hit it right at $9.99 for me - I went from buying a CD every few weeks to an "album" from iTunes at least once a week. Sometimes 2 or 3 a week. I burn them to CD, print the nice covers, and I'm good to go.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    12. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      It's worse in the States as far as retail goes. They'll sell a single disk of, say Brain of Morbius for $25. Whereas if they sold them by season at a reasonable price, I'd have at least the Pertwee, Tom Baker and McCoy stuff.

    13. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      After you figure in printing those covers (ink ain't cheap, and if you use proper jewel case inserts the paper has some expense too), the blank CD, a label to over the front, AND the album from iTunes, you've well above the $12-14 that the real thing would have costed (or even less if you buy used), and you can pop that CD into your computer, fire up CDex and then have the songs on your computer in a better forma, sans DRM. Heck you can even use iTunes to rip your CD's directly into your iTunes library.

      The only time I use iTunes anymore is for those one-hit wonder songs I hear on the radio and like. For anything I actually want the album for (mainly soundtracks), I buy the real CD (and stick it on a shelf never to be touched again after ripping it :)).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    14. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by jdoeii · · Score: 1
      So the article is blustering.

      That's only if you take it at a face value. The real goal of the article is to reduce out-of-country DVD purchases by scaring some people. And it looks to me the article is working beautifully. Even here everyone discusses the dogs.

    15. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      3$ is an impulse item charge, people would be grabbing handfuls of them, not even bothering with most file trading or looking up "CD Leroy" at the flea market.

      Of course, that would have the unfortunate side effect of putting every rental company in the country out of business.

    16. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by WinterSolstice · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ummm - no. I print it on plain old normal paper ($4 per 500 sheets, so $0.008) with ink that only costs about $13 per 100+ sheets ($0.13). It goes into a media folder that holds 400 CDs (so 200 with art) and cost $30 ($0.15 per CD with media). I cut it out with a pair of scissors. I burn on fairly normal Fry's media at about $15 per 100 ($0.15). That brings my total cost (obviously not factoring in my computer or printer, which I would need anyway) to a grand total of $10.428. We'll call it $10.43.

      So - let's compare that, for a new release that I just bought last night when I had an urge to hear Death Cab for Cutie (Transatlanticism) to a trip to my closest store (which is about 5 miles - it being a Target).
      The album on iTunes cost me $9.99 ($10.43 adjusted) and about 5 minutes of time while I was playing WoW.

      According to the Target website it is currently $12.96. Assuming I drive, it will take me at least 10 minutes to drive there. I could conceivably be home with it in hand within 30 minutes - assuming they have it. It would cost me fuel (20 mpg/$3.35/g so $1.675)

      The album now cost me $13.932 with tax. With gas, we're looking at an adjusted price of $15.607 ($15.61). That, and I would have had to stop playing WoW, get dressed, go to Target at 22:35 last night... and oops. They close at 21:00.

      So - basically, to make a long story short - you're just plain wrong. The only point you have is DRM, and honestly I could care less. It's not like I can't pull the music back in with only minor signal loss (AAC -> AIF) and have DRM-free tunes.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    17. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by JeTmAn81 · · Score: 1

      You're right as far as the costs go, however I still prefer CD's given their uncompressed audio quality and perfectly printed liner notes and jewel case backing. My optimal solution is a subscription to Yahoo Music where I can listen to anything I want and identify the stuff I REALLY want to buy and have forever as opposed to the stuff I'd just like to listen to at the moment. This lets me listen to all the new albums that come out as well. And for seven bucks a month, it's the same as foregoing half a CD each month to have unlimited listening access to hundreds of thousands of other CD's. Then when I really want to own something forever (through the Yahoo subscription I've identified the entire discographies of Simon & Garfunkel, Steely Dan and Dire Straits as well as the first six albums from Van Halen as being worth owning) I can just order the CD's and not worry about when they get to my house.

      --
      "Me? Lady, I'm your worst nightmare -- a pumpkin with a gun."
    18. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I generally make my purchases on the way home from work, which means the gas is free (I was in the area anyways).

      You're not getting the same thing though. You're not getting a jewel case. Ok, fair enough, but I certainly want one for my CD's. A jewel case it going to add at least $0.25. I also don't just want album artwork, but also the CD "artwork", so any CD that I burn is going to get a printed label. To get decent inserts you pretty much need proper inserts (copier paper just doesn't work well). Going with the low cost stuff it's going to be $0.70 for the insert and another $0.15 for the label. I'll use your estimates on printing & media costs. In almost every state you're also required to pay a use tax on things like iTunes purchases, but we'll ignore that ammount.

      $0.25 Case
      $0.15 Label
      $0.70 Insert
      $0.13 Printing
      $0.15 CD
      $9.99 iTunes
      Total: $11.37

      Your total CD price, $13.93 (again, I'm not going to include gas since very few people make a trip specifically for such an item)

      Difference is $2.56, for which you're getting audio of inferior quality, DRM-protected sources, with more easily damaged media, & home printer generated artwork. Technically it is cheaper comparing the brand new CD, but I'd still classify the CD as a better value.

      OR, I could just go to Half.com, where your stated CD is available used for $7.00 + $2.69 shipping, coming up to $9.69, which is cheaper shipped than even the iTunes album costs. I make my rip, have better quality, no DRM, an original CD, and spent less money on it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    19. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      See? And that is a reasonable argument. It's the same reason I buy Santana and a few others on CD. If it sounds like crap on iTunes (and some stuff *really* sucks on there) then it is worth the money. Same reason they make the high-def CDs and records... some stuff is really important.

      Or, if I know it will be part of a collection of some sort. (Rush, for example - I own them all).

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    20. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by MBGMorden · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm not going to include gas as I certainly wouldn't make a trip specifically to buy a CD (such purchases are generally made on the way home from work for me, or when I'm in town shopping anyways).

      With that, for less than a $3 difference versus a new CD, you're getting a homeburnt CD, with home printer artwork, felt markered "label", DRM'd sources, no jewel case, and inferior quality audio (that will deteriorate even further if you rerip to remove the DRM).

      OR, you can go over to Half.com where the CD is available used for $7 + $2.69 shipping. For $9.69 (cheaper than even the raw data on iTunes, let alone the extra cost of physicall making your "album") you've got your CD with none of the above disadvantages.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    21. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Double post on this one. Didn't think the earlier one made it through and quickly retyped the jist of it here.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    22. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only is it easy to teach a dog to do this, it is easy to accidentally teach her to do it.

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    23. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but unless you can come up with some hard, documented evidence, your assertions here are baseless.

      You must be new here.
    24. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a cop. How do I know? He always sides with the cops. here's one, Where's your evidence? I personally proved a cop lying in court. Want proof dickhead.

    25. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I'll reply to this one, instead of your other one if you don't mind -

      I totally see your point - but I don't think you see mine. The point of the original parent was that if they reduced the cost of CDs and Movies, they would become more "impulse" driven.

      What I did was refute your argument that it was the same cost - if a person is willing to accept an "improper" insert (I certainly am - I could care less about most of that junk), then there is not only a difference in "user experience", but in cost. Target/Sam Goody/etc suck. You are limited to what they have on hand for one, and for two they tend to require large time investments. iTunes is fast and easy. Online stores are fast and easy, but there is a long delay before the media arrives.

      DRM is pointless - nobody outside of the /. community even really cares. Media decay is similarly pointless - if I think I'll be listening to something in 5+ years (the shelf life of a CD-R), I probably would want the nice foldouts and info. If I cared about the cover art, I'd buy a record. I can barely even see the art on the little CDs. Therefore, with few exceptions, iTunes/Napster/Yahoo et al are a perfect choice for the common impulse purchase.
      Quality? If you care about quality you probably would buy a hi-def CD in the first place - even regular CDs are only so-so. Most downloadable music is certainly worthy of listening to on any system that costs less than $200. If you care enough to use a power conditioner or high-end audio cables you certainly care enough to get good media.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    26. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1
      I know this from...a trainer, we'll leave it at that. They have ways to make dogs indicate a "hit", using body language or subtle hand movements, etc., that part varies. They use that "technique" all the time when they want to search a car for instance even when the dog doesn't have a legit "hit".
      Actually, no - a real trainer does not teach them anything that way. Rather...they basically get the dogs addicted to the various substances they want them to look for, or related substances (.e.g cocaine, lsd, gunpowder, etc.). I know this from a trainer that is a friend of my family who has trained a number of police dogs for various purposes for years.

      Now if a dog's human partner gives them additional "training" to do so - then that cop is looking for trouble and will eventually end up with all kinds of legal matters of his/her own.

      Point is - unless the trainer is corrupt (possible), it's not the trainer training them to do that - it's the corrupt officer.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    27. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by RiddleofSteel · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't have any family in law enforcement, they do it all the time. My uncle Kenny is my credible source. :P

    28. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure, everybody has a friend who was fucked over because the cops bent or broke some law, but unless you can come up with some hard, documented evidence, your assertions here are baseless.

      Are you asserting that unless you see names, SS numbers, home addresses of some crooked cops, the dates and locations of their transgressions, and witnesses that will testify against them, that you won't believe that there is such a thing as crooked cops?

    29. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by instarx · · Score: 1

      Why not link to some credible sources, Mr. Anonymous? Sure, everybody has a friend who was fucked over because the cops bent or broke some law, but unless you can come up with some hard, documented evidence, your assertions here are baseless.

      "Baseless" and "not verifiable" are two very different things. His assertions are anecdotal and non-specific, and therefore not verifiable, but let's face it - an assertion that the police sometimes skirt the law to get arrests they would not otherwise get is probably not baseless.

    30. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by name*censored* · · Score: 1

      yeah, thats because its slashdot....we post comments in reply/rebuttal/our-two-cents to articles..and this one was about dogs! anyways, this thread has veered WAY off topic from dogs :) (ps: not a troll)

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    31. Re:dirty little secret about pig dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  120. Au contrair... by Garridan · · Score: 1

    Money is bound by no jurisdiction.

  121. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

    Because this is the MPAA and FedEx, not Customs?

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  122. Forget the discs, what about the content? by jamrock · · Score: 1

    I'll be impressed when they can train the dogs to sniff out shitty movies.

    1. Re:Forget the discs, what about the content? by klang · · Score: 1

      The dog is only 99% correct .. it simply finds all DVD's

  123. MPAA Trains dogs to sniff d33z!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuts, the MPAA and RIAA are simply nazi's.

  124. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you think it is legal to attempt to interfere with and impede the operations of the US Customs?

    Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Why do they think it's legal to treat me as guilty until I prove myself innocent?

  125. labels aren't digital rights management by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "This is a DRM Anti-Piracy Copyright Protection Seal" label on the seam of each case. At that point, the mere discussion of how to circumvent said label & gain unauthorized access to the contents would be a class C felony.

    A label isn't "digital rights management"...

    1. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Why not, the lable is on a DVD, which contains Digital data and it's a form of Rights Management in that it is being used to ensure that only the intended recipient recieves and views the data.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      Okay, what if it included some sort of RFID-esque identifier? ...or if it was printed digitally?

      C'mon, don't make me hack a musical Hallmark card to press its chip into service as a digital combination lock for DVD cases. Though quite vulnerable to "brute force" attacks, it would still handily satisfy the definition of DRM. But sheez, it's Glenfiddich time & I really prefer not to need that kind of coordination any more tonight. Can't we just call the label "good enough" and share a toast to our good comrades at FedEX?

    3. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps if the label contained a 30 digit hex unlock code that is the encryption key for the disc. The fedex folks in a hurry wouldn't write down that number and cut right through it- which would of course be on that metal film that disintegrates easily and would thus be unreadable after the fact.

    4. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but most DRM schemes amount to about as much...

    5. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A label isn't "digital rights management"...

      [DMCA Sec 1202](b) REMOVAL OR ALTERATION OF COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION- No person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner or the law--
            (1) intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information

      That said, it appears that in this case it is customs (British customs no less) that have been recruited to fight the War On People. As far as I know they can open any package, break everything inside and there isn't boo you can do about it.

    6. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure ? Americans still seem to think that you are bound by a EULA *inside* a sealed CD-case when you break the seal (and had *no way* to access that EULA). Why than should a same kind of seal not be a "protection" in DRM sense ?

      Now I think of it : Replacing that "digital *restrictions* management" sticker with your own EULA : "the person, persons or company who opened this package agrees to pay the legitimate owner a sum of no less than 1,000 dollars, or 5 percent of their annual gain, whichever is more".

      Hey, if a company can do that legitimatily (state the rules *after* the fact (purchace of the item/opening of the case) ), than it should be legitimate for a *real* person too. :-)

    7. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by egarland · · Score: 1

      Clever. But destroying access isn't voilating DRM.

      I'm pretty sure you have to allow customs to inspect cargo traveling internationally so pretty much if they want to see if they are pirated DVD's they can.

      This is the correct way to fight piracy, not CSS, TCPA, and encrypted TV hookups.

      --
      set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
    8. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, and I agree with you here. This topic provided a good attack vector on the more draconian & infringing nti-piracy schemes, but yeah, shippers public & private have the right to pretty much set whatever policy they choose WRT restricting & inspecting the cargo they carry, and that's as it should be.

    9. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if it includes a picture of your finger.

    10. Re:labels aren't digital rights management by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      even better would be the label looks blank but is printed in UV ink!

  126. Lunch by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    "Seriously, this is like training drug dogs to find plastic bags."

    What, you mean I can't ship sandwiches with FedEx anymore?

  127. Is this a joke? It's so inanely absurd. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    This is so inanely absurd. Just because it's a DVD, doesn't mean it's illegal. Just because someone has a baggie full of white powder, doesn't mean it's illegal either.

    Imagine bringing a baggie full of baking soda and salt through airport security for example, trying to explain to them that you use that as an alternative to brush one's teeth due to the harmful chemicals they put in toothpaste.

    Imagine having a case of syringes you bring with you to college because you like infecting your burritos full of hot sauce.

  128. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't as stupid as it may seem at first inspection.

    Send a 9.4 GB of /dev/urandom and use it to encrypt the "real" content as a one time pad.
    Send both via different routes or at different times and unless you know which two match
    all you get is random numbers. If a one time pad is good enough for the Secret Squirrel
    spy guys, it should be good enough here.

  129. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by pintomp3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    you got rid of the dogs, but what about all the bums licking your floor?

  130. Its really simple, bury them. by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    Put those aol discs to use, grab a few 'free' discs, grab a fedex flat rate mailer and donate the postage amount to the cause, if we all
    do this they're going to need a whole bunch of dogs and a whole lot of customs inspectors.

    If the MPAA/RIAA had its way they would be checking data at the airport, much like a currency needs to be declared now if your carrying a lot of it.

    I travel quite a bit via Airplane with are a relatively large amount of data (a little over a TB) the majority of which is legitimate
    but would certainly appear to be bootleg (OS disc images, multiple virtual machines, music and video that I have transcoded from media that I have purchased, etc.)

    Its already a lot of fun with TSA looking, looking and looking some more but imagine having to have your data examined; encrypt it and your a crook, leave it unprotected and your a fool, either way you know they would love to see it. Paranoid? maybe but this is really getting out of hand.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  131. Dogs sniff DVDs; MPAA ups the ante by cnerd2025 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, who came up with this idea. This goes to show what a crackpot organization the MPAA is. What for profit company has the cash to train animals to sniff out "pirates"? MPAA does. I can think of one prime example: the De Beers diamond cartel in Africa. Like MPAA, De Beers has also received prejudicial treatment from the current administration. It also holds nearly 80% of the global diamond market, and is the sole reason that diamonds are indeed so valuable. By stockpiling diamonds via its monopoly, De Beers inflates the price while simultaneously using its marketing (A Diamond is Forever) to drive up demand. Feel free to read how wonderful a citizen this company is and has been throughout its history. De Beers would kill and does kill to ensure its diamond monopoly is unhindered. De Beers diamond mines would rival the security at the prison Zacharias Mousaoui was sentenced to last week. To me there seems to be a clear parallel between De Beers and the MPAA (or RIAA). Inflate prices through monopoly, buy off the government, drown any possible competition in paperwork, and prevent legitimate competition from freely working (DRM for indie artists, anyone?). I'll choose to vote with my wallet. Of course, it is also quite easy to complain to the FTC about antitrust violations.

    1. Re:Dogs sniff DVDs; MPAA ups the ante by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      You forgot that if they can corrupt the gubment they can corrupt the FTC as well

    2. Re:Dogs sniff DVDs; MPAA ups the ante by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      That thought went through my head actually before I wrote that. However, if enough people complained, the FTC would have to take notice. Also, if the FTC did absolutely nothing (which is quite likely), that strengthens any sort of civil action and/or criminal charges against them. Remember, the Federal government is being bought out this time; the state governments are actually standing much more in line with consumers. Just check out New York state's Attorney General, Elliot Spitzer. Thanks for the comments, though.

  132. I Don't Know About You All... by Quantam · · Score: 1

    But I suddenly have a tremendous urge to go mailing crates of blank DVDs to random people around the world.

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  133. Opposite of Intended Effect by zaliph · · Score: 1

    Lets say, for the sake of argument, I'm a US police official specializing in using bomb-sniffing (and now DVD-sniffing) dogs. My best friend goes ballistic over a package marked for [insert media outlet here] and, upon opening the package, I find a screener copy of [insert over-hyped film, three weeks before release]. WWJD?

    It doesn't matter who is overseeing sensitive media; a party with interests other than that of the industry will be there to snag a copy. On a side, the money spent on this project alone is probably not even close to the salary of a well-known celebrity for a three-week role, so it's probably in the best interest of the MPAA and, eventually, the RIAA (who will be opening all your mail from Amazon.com and the like) to start this project country-wide immediately. And to the comforted, who believe this is only for bulk-mail shipments, please think slightly harder.

  134. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by Quantam · · Score: 1

    You deserve a Nobel prize for that

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  135. UP with hope... and DOWN with dope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'll divulge what I know...

    First, coffee beans. Supposedly, if your cannabis, hard drugs or DVDs are wrapped in coffee, dogs can't distinguish it.

    Second, airtight packaging seems a little impractical; at 35,000 AGL you're likely to pop whatever airtight container you're shipping. Tupperware I suppose? Human-occupied cabins are pressurized; I don't know about cargo compartments on FedEx planes. Even so, unless you can vacuum seal it, it's not worth risking a change in elevation (more a concern for drugs than your DVDs, but whatever).

    You could ship it ground, but only from Mexico and Canada (not large purveyors of pirated content; I'm thinking China and the Middle East). You could ship it by boat, but it takes a long time (and it's hard to do if you don't have something ginormous like a car or the Statue of Liberty or something).

    Lastly, even if you could seal it such that it was air tight and practical, you have to get the scent off the outside of the package. With drugs, this is huge, because most drugs are not cohesive like a DVD (they're either liquid, granular, or in the case of pot, 'crystally' and 'sticky' hehe). For a DVD... who knows what particles make up their scent or how 'sticky' they are.

    If you actually found a way to do all of this airproofing on an economical scale, you're in business. Think of the stinkiest thing ever - a French person (no j/k) a can of garlic, vinegar, ammonia, chlorine (for pools/spas), a fart/turd, whatever. If you seal it well, you can't smell it, right? Now seal it 40x better, because dog's noses are that much more sensitive... and you're sniffing-dog-proof. I've never tried it; but it's not that complicated, really. Dog's don't have ESP; they have sensitive nostrils. The inside of a truly airtight container cannot be detected by scent alone.

    Me, I'd go with the coffee bean idea, and no return address (they can't prosecute you because some guy in China sent you a bunch of DVDs, right? Especially if you're smart and don't have evidence at your house).

    1. Re:UP with hope... and DOWN with dope! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      First, disregard the economical item. Sadly, Drugs are always economical.

      But you have it right. There is almost always a scent on the outside. It is very difficult to ship anything without a scent being transfered to the outside.

      If you ship a joint, they will probably look the other way. If you ship a pound or more, then the end desitination WILL be watched for whoever picks it up (or even delivered to).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:UP with hope... and DOWN with dope! by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      First, coffee beans. Supposedly, if your cannabis, hard drugs or DVDs are wrapped in coffee, dogs can't distinguish it.

      I've heard of this, but I don't have a dog nor cannabis. I have coffee and DVDs, and though coffee does have this rep. I have not yet had an issue crossing the boarder with Coffee, even bulk ground coffee.

      The only issue I have had was ordering a hammick from Mexico where it seemed FedEx asked me if my package had anything to do with chemical or nuclear weapons.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  136. Hide coffee with your computer. :-P by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    Drug trafficers sometimes pack coffee with their contraban to throw off the dogs at the airport. If that is the case, put a small bag of Millstone in your computer satchel.

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  137. Hermetically seal it by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Can the dogs smell through a sealed-glass container?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  138. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by rts008 · · Score: 1

    LOL!!!
    Wouldn't surprise me if some moron tried scraping some up and trying to smoke it! Ughhhh!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  139. So may thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are so many thoughts on this silly idea... So the dogs sniff WHAT? DVD-R discs? Will the dogs sniff the data, DRM and region codes too? Just to totally throw them off I would be happy to mail 1000 DVD-Rs, each inkjet printed with a movie title. But they're blank. Then I would get on their case for opening and delaying my delivery of blank DVD-Rs.

    Another thought, however, is that this is a pure publicity stunt. Those dogs will NOT be around all the FedEx parcels. It would take WAY too long. In Japan, where I live, FedEx packages practically make it through customes without any checks. They move too fast. If the inspectors insist that each package be checked, FedEx will just flex some administrative connection muscle and get them to stop. One guy that works at FedEx told me that if I wanted to smuggle drugs, forget about taking a package by hand, just mail it FedEx and it will most likely make it. (No guarantees though, since ONCE IN A WHILE, the dogs are there, and would sniff suspicious looking parcels.) As for drugs, it makes some sense. With DVDs, it won't work, because you can't tell the difference between legit and non-legit, and I'm willing to bet that it was't just that particular day that most packages contained false positives.

  140. decoration by nephridium · · Score: 1

    You could even further reduce cost by breaking single DVDs into pieces and 'decorating' your packages and envelopes with it. It's a bit more work I guess, but DVD sprinkles actually look nice ;)

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  141. Ship UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck a dog.

    1. Re:Ship UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would do both, if UPS left the motherfucking package at my goddam fucking door instead of requiring a signature every time (I could sign that stupid piece of paper until there was not a square nanometer left uncovered, and they still won't fucking leave it. So it takes me about another week to get the time off work to get to the fucking shipping depot and pick it up just because they're cum guzzling gutter sluts.)

      At least FedEx is somewhat sane about leaving packages on my completely safe door stoop.

  142. Are DVDs detectable on X-Ray? by gameforge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know those X-Ray things that your laptop has to go through at airport security?

    Have you ever seen a CD/DVD in the microwave? I realize it's a different energy... but I'll bet that a case of 1000s of DVDs is going to look suspcious enough on X-Ray to give them a perfectly legit reason to open the case; that is, if they can't immediately tell that they're DVDs.

    Sorry, I don't know any facts here... they do use X-Ray on international FedEx packages, don't they? Wouldn't a DVD show up on it?

    To be perfectly honest, I've never heard of these giant pirating rings in the US. That doesn't mean they're not there, but... it seems like the MPAA is trying to get the public to associate pirating with the same subcutlure as drugs. Everyone's nailed the coffin shut on the practicality with this. Why else would they resort to being so eccentric? Desperate, even.

    And think of the poor dogs! Instead of enjoying the good life being someone's pet, or saving peoples' lives, or being attack hounds, they catch... movie bootleggers. What a life! Hehe.

  143. They have priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Current Dept Justice Priorities:

    1. Counterfit crapola
    2. Sex toys (in Alabama, Georgia, Texas)
    3. Nail clippers on planes
    4. Murderers, bombers, thieves, etc

  144. Just what the Doctor ordered .. by Memnos · · Score: 1

    ... for any Unabomber types who get pissed off at Fed EX

    --
    I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
  145. Well... there's a way around this I'd think. by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

    No matter what's on the DVD (if it's a burn), just label it "Home movies - July 2005" or something. It can always be re-labeled upon arrival if that even matters. If they view it, I'm sure that's got to be infringing on privacy somehow or another.

    --
    Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  146. Let's clog up the system by chembro84 · · Score: 1

    I say we all send blank DVD-Rs with movie titles written on them, let them waste their time until it's not worth it anymore.

    1. Re:Let's clog up the system by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Better still, if it's just the scent of a DVD they're going on, just take that annoying completely clear "DVD" that's always the top disk in a spool of DVD's and send that. It should smell the same, and you don't lose the usable disks :P

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  147. Your tax dollars? What tax dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We pay almost NO taxes for all the shit that we have. It's called "debt" and we are up to our armpits in it. Luckily, we all probably wont live long enough to have to worry about paying it off. Thanks kids and grandkids!

  148. Yes there message is clear by blanks · · Score: 1

    "While all were legitimate shipments on the day, our message to anyone thinking about shipping counterfeit DVDs through the FedEx network is simple: you're going to get caught."

    No there message should be, any and all packages containing any type of cd media will be opened and searched/viewed, (including company backups and other secure information).  How this can be legal and why fedex would agreee to this in any way is beyond my understanding.

  149. Shipping marijuana in baby jars by linzeal · · Score: 1

    You can ship marijuana in 2 baby jars put inside a wide mouth mason jar and than filled with a heavy cooking oil. Impossible for any significant amount of odor to get through that much oil. Some people wrap the marijuana inside the baby jars, I do not think it is neccesary. You have to reseal the baby jars though.

    1. Re:Shipping marijuana in baby jars by ampathee · · Score: 1

      Shyah, now that wouldn't look suspicious on an X-ray..

  150. And they do. Often. by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I bought a Hafler amp on eBay and Customs decided they wanted a look at it. Not supprised, on an X-ray it's a thing with big, spikey looking fins (heat sinks). They opened it, decided it was ok, carefully rewrapped it, sealed it with green US Customs tape to let me know they'd looked at it, and sent it on it's way.

    Now I personally have no problem with this if (and only if) they are inspecting bulk shipments. First, only in a bulk shipment woudl you find enough movies to make it worth while (stopping them 1 and 2 at a time is not cost effective) and second the people doing bulk are usually aren't just commiting copyright infringement, they are commiting fraud. They are often trying to pass off their movies as orignals for profit. That I think you have to object to, regardless of you stances on copyright. Copying a movie for no profit online is one thing, trying to pass counterfit copies off as legit is another.

    So if they are going after the bulk movies, and I'd assume they are, then I say good. THAT is a part of the "piracy" war we want to see. The fraudsters do not deserve money, consumers do not deserve to be ripped off with counterfit goods. However if they are looking for some guy sending 2 burned DVDs to his buddy, then they need to quit wasting the time of customes agents.

  151. sniffing magnetic media by pintomp3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when i travel, i don't bring dvds with me. i rip them to .iso and mount them on my laptop for viewing. good luck sniffing my sectors.

  152. See you in Singsing, errr I mean Sony Prison. by gd23ka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually they're not at all interested in "cutting off piracy" (instead they're all interested in cutting off privacy which is what I just accidentally mistyped). They're happy to have another way to criminalize you and send you to jail for a couple of years right along with the kid next door smoking pot because you "pirated" one of their movies or songs. Since prisons have been privatized in the US you could even be sent to Sony Prison.

    1. Re:See you in Singsing, errr I mean Sony Prison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since prisons have been privatized in the US you could even be sent to Sony Prison.

      If it works as well as most of my Sony products, I'll be getting back out soon!

    2. Re:See you in Singsing, errr I mean Sony Prison. by Wooloomooloo · · Score: 0
      Since prisons have been privatized in the US you could even be sent to Sony Prison.
      Don't worry, they have rootkits there. Get one and you'll be able to simply walk out through the front door.
    3. Re:See you in Singsing, errr I mean Sony Prison. by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's got to be better than Federal PoundMeInTheAss Prison.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  153. You're a pack of morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear, slashdotters don't even read the summary anymore. It says right there that this is a customs thing, but half the comments are whiny crap talking about domestic US shipments.

    This is stupid, but it's not a violation of privacy. Read before you post, people!

  154. WhoA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KILL THE DOGS! before they evolve

  155. Arrr matey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you commit a crime "between countries," what happens?

    Don't you know? Software and media companies name an action that doesn't have anything in common after it. And you probably get away with the crime.

  156. Privacy does not exist when sending a package by Gorthax · · Score: 3, Informative

    Being a customs broker, i am amazed at the volume of reply's citing privacy rights. With packages entering the US each and every one is subject to customs search, which is not payed by taxes but paid by the consignee or ultimate recieving party. Also when you send a package internationally or domestically you agree that it may and probably will be inspected by either mechanical or human means. Read the fine print.... If you dont want to open yourself to a 4th party inspection, dont use a 3rd party courier.... Also, every container entering our ports IS inspected, by means of an x-ray machine "VICAS". Customs officers are employed to inspect shipments, they are not wasting time inspecting shipments personally. They are doing their job THOUROUGHLY. I bet you wouldnt complain if the same could be said for the DMV.

  157. How can this even be legal? by Nonillion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can this even be legal? What bone head brainless piece of shit at FedEx allowed the MPAA to do this? If I ship a DVD to some one I expect it to only be opened by one person, the recipient. This would be like the RIAA going to the post office and opening everyones mail looking for lyrics. Un fucking believable! Well, the MPAA has pushed me into buying even FEWER DVDs this year.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:How can this even be legal? by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Um, it's Her Majesty's CUSTOMS. They can open any or all packages that come into the UK looking for contraband, which includes pirated DVDs. This isn't domestic mail we're talking about. Do they probably have better things to be doing? Yup. Are they completely within the law to do this? Yup.

  158. Finally, we have an answer to the question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The MPAA let the dogs out.

    Now for the good of all humanity, please NEVER play that "song" again.

    1. Re:Finally, we have an answer to the question. by flewp · · Score: 1

      Now there's a good use for these dogs... Train them to smell out the piles of shit that is known as pop music.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  159. Nah by woolio · · Score: 2, Informative

    After a few dozen false alarms, maybe they'll learn to stop invading customer privacy.

    After a few dozen false alarms, **YOU** would be deemed a threat to national security (after all, you're DOSing the justice system) and the corresponding consequences would follow.

    The only difference is we're not talking about sniffing powdered sugar in front of a police station.... We're talking about a legal item (dvd) being used in a common & legal way (transporting through mail).

    1. Re:Nah by crumshot · · Score: 1

      MPAA != national security

  160. Follow Up Story: by Antarius · · Score: 1

    "Following the success of their DVD Sniffer Dogs, the MPAA is trialling processes to stamp out on-line piracy.

    Employing virtual Dogs, supplied by NintenDogs, the MPAA is now sniffing out all packets on the Internet.

    Packets containing torrents or other P2P data are immediately 'sniffed' looking for potential copyright violations.

    There are hopes that similar methods can be used to combat mail packets containing Spam."

    Actually, it means that I might have to re-think my "Coaster-labelling policy." Whenever I burn a coaster, I've historically labelled it something like "The Only Bug Free Copy of Windows in Existance," or "Elvis Presley/Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits," etc.

    But then, maybe they'd think they were "super encrypted" disks and then spend weeks trying to decrypt them.

  161. They were *all* false positives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the article, you will find out that EVERY shipment they opened was a false positive! That's right, they didn't even catch *ANY* pirates!

    Which just goes to show you that this is a complete and utter waste of time for the customs inspectors.

  162. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do you think it is legal to attempt to interfere with and impede the operations of the US Customs?

    Clearly you've missed a step in your logic - the step which assumes it is somehow illegal to ship a DVD full of random and meaningless data. There should be no problem with this.

    If doing such a harmless and legal thing would somehow "interfere with" the US Customs, then the US Customs should put themselves onto the right side of the law. If there is any problem, it is a problem on the part of Customs.

    The thing with "rights" is that if you don't use them, you lose them.

  163. Send Fred Smith a DVD! by Sucellus · · Score: 1

    I have an idea. How about everyone send their complaints and concerns via a file copied onto a DVD and send it to FedEx to the attention of Fred Smith.

  164. Airport Xray too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently flew between two major cities in Aus. They didn't pick up the umbrella in my case. I didn't know about it since I didn't pack the case. So much for their millions spent on security.

  165. Why? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do so few question how MPAA can have these legal powers to train dogs to find DVD discs and get them to open them to check if they were pirated? When there's apparently no good legal ground for it (the DVD's were all legal). How much of a police *are* these guys anyway?

    In USA, can anyone basically gain police powers if there's a suspicion for crime? Wait, scratch that. Can anyone basically gain police powers when ther's NO suspicion for crime?

    MPAA isn't even a government body. It seems to surely be an organization that unifies the government, police, and media industry though. I just wonder how the heck they do it and have so few complain. This is obviously not just a concern for the pirates, but for anyone who wonders what a basic organization can and can not do even without suspicions of crime.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Why? by LionOfMacedon · · Score: 1

      for the very same reason many other privacy violations go unnoticed.people dont care,/. does,but not many are americans,out of the 300million mayne some thousands or more visit here,out of the rest another 100000 may care,but the absoloute majority do not.you know,its like if anyone objects,the mpaa shouts in a big voice "everyone,this man supports piracy!.tie em to the stake".to most its not even an issue,and very few actually understand what piracy means and what their rights are,most are too obsessed with themselves or some other junk to actually consider about *boring* things like rights and stuff.

    2. Re:Why? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1


      In USA, can anyone basically gain police powers if there's a suspicion for crime? Wait, scratch that. Can anyone basically gain police powers when ther's NO suspicion for crime?

      This is happening in the United Kingdom. I know it may be too much to assk you to RTFA, but would it be too much trouble to RTF FIRST LINE of the SUBMISSION?

  166. Maybe they... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    ...were too busy looking at a test image that makes sure they're paying attention? :)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  167. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by flonker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can say you're shipping a one time pad for future communications.

  168. Re:Windows 95 beta CD's smelled like.... celery! by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1

    Active Windows 95 beta testers were well-accustomed to the bi-weekly Airborne envelopes whose contents smelled like celery, back in the day. It was a running joke.

  169. Re:HD-DVD BluRay by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Are they trained for HD-DVDs and BluRay? Maybe they're just trying to get us to jump the new tech so they don't have to worry about the patent expiration so much...

    Hmm, I wonder if Netflix has plans to start lining their envelopes with coffee...?

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  170. Not how it works at all! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The dogs have been specially trained by Scotland Yard to be able to not only sniff for the existence of DVDs in a package, but to sniff the bits and bytes embedded on the DVD.

    Well that's just crazy! Obviously the dogs have frickin' lasers attached to thier heads.

    They read the discs directly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  171. Wait a minute...... by DK_LA · · Score: 1

    Why is the Motion Picture Association of AMERICA doing a test in a UK FedEx Hub?!?!?!?

    1. Re:Wait a minute...... by DK_LA · · Score: 1

      Also... is the MPAA even a law-enforcement agency? Are they allowed to conduct searches in the first place??

    2. Re:Wait a minute...... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      In this case, yes because they didn't open the packages. All they did was suggest to HM Customs and Excise which packages may contain DVDs (Which if they're coming from abroad are fair game for a customs check) and then Customs and Excise opened them.

      I don't agree with it, but it's not illegal.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  172. Hmmm....what next.... by PCeye · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's been great concern and priority put to training dogs to sniff out drugs, bombs, weapons and illegal immigrants. I've heard CNN doom and gloom reports over the years concerning efficiency of the above activities being detected. In light of such "concerns" that would threaten a shipping network, FedEx train dogs to detect DVD's.

    The "press release" pointed out the DVD's found were all in legal packaging. Message is clear alright, FedEx could have invested in x-ray equipment instead. So FedEx are going to tear apart every package sniffed out to contain DVD's and hold up these shipments to figure out which are MPAA approved? Must have taken many snausages to get Flo & Lucky to additionally detect region codes.

    Next, I wonder how long it would take and how much money FedEx can additionally waste to train Flo and Lucky to sniff out counterfeit Rolex watches?

    1. Re:Hmmm....what next.... by Popcorn+Dave · · Score: 1

      Better yet, maybe they can train these dogs to sniff out the bad bits of my code. Then you'd have something worth paying for.

    2. Re:Hmmm....what next.... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Also what if I wrap a DVD for a gift for someone, put it in a fedex package and send it out? Is fedex going to rewrap my gift for me? Is it going to get there the way I intended it? It's not a -huge- point, but it'd be important to me. If this is true there's no way I'll ever use UPS again... Hell, I'm a major DVD collector and I'm questioning whether I want to continue that... I've always hated the RIAA's bitching and whining, but that wasn't a big deal, I was never a big CD collector (To the RIAA: No, that doesn't mean all I do is pirate music, it means I listen to the radio you bastards.) This almost puts the MPAA to the same level as the RIAA IMO, not that they were worlds apart before, but damn, that's intrusive on a lot of levels. Can't wait to see them try this with the USPS.

  173. Nobody reads TFA anymore .. by klang · · Score: 1

    "The dogs, Lucky and Flo, faced their first test at the FedEx UK hub at Stansted Airport" (and that's from the totally unread teaser!)

    Not RIAA
    Not MPAA
    Not USA

    Just a test, in another country.

  174. hmm, watching MY dvd's would be illegal by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work at a film production place. We send out about 150 screening DVDs a year. None of which are counterfeit, ALL of which are protected by copyright / licensing.

    So an agent of our courier opening and viewing them would be illegal or at least a civil offense on their part. The person sending them doesn't have the power to sign a piece of paper giving our courier or their agent permission to watch the DVDs.

    Finding a burned DVD inside a sealed envelope is not reasonable cause.

    At least I know who not to recommend as a courier.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:hmm, watching MY dvd's would be illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wait a moment, isn't the film (and music) production industry always the first to legitimate unreasonable measures to guarantee them their income in the presence of piracy?
      I don't understand why you are worried. You should be grateful, and you should not mind your 150 packages are opened to find possible pirated content in other packages being shipped.

      When you don't agree with that, then why do I have to agree to paying a tax on blank CD and DVD media that I only use to burn free software and my own documents (for backup)? That money goes to musicians and film producers that have no right to it whatsoever.
      I find it illegal to extort money from people that way, but producers don't mind.

    2. Re:hmm, watching MY dvd's would be illegal by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's not FedEx inspecting them - it's Customs inspecting packages being sent internationally. Customs have had this legal power for decades; they can open and inspect any package they want.

    3. Re:hmm, watching MY dvd's would be illegal by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      > I don't understand why you are worried.

      I don't understand why you think I'm worried.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  175. How about the other way around... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Now if there were dogs that could sniff out the MPAA and their lawyers, there might be something worth the effort to train.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  176. "Throw-down" guns by StupidKatz · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... carrying a "throw away". They will have access to a confiscated firearm, if involved in "an unfortunate shooting when the perp made a threatening movement" they can stick the gun in his dead hands.

    I don't have a lot of information on the rest of your claims, but I do know this one to be utter BS, at least where there is at least one honest forensic investigator.
    A "throw-down" gun will generally only have prints on the grip and trigger. A gun owned by a human will have prints all over the place: internal parts (put there when cleaning), magazine/cylinder, even each individual round of ammunition. It would be extremely obvious to investigators if a "throw-down" gun was used.

    1. Re:"Throw-down" guns by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the owner was careful to use gloves while cleaning or otherwise handling the gun. You then may ask, "If he was so careful with the gun normally, why was he not wearing the gloves when he shot at the officers?" Because he was afraid it would look suspicious.

      Anyway, a scenario, even a tenuous one, can be established to support the lack of fingerprints on the gun.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    2. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do know this one to be utter BS, at least where there is at least one honest forensic investigator.

      That's a big "if".

      I'm not saying there are none, but some aren't honest. Too many, in fact. Try not to forget that.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most places don't have forensic investigators. I was just reading about how many juries are throwing cases because the police didn't use all the latest stuff as seen on CSI and Law & Order. The prosecuter in the interview seemed to think this was a bad thing. If I were on a jury, I'd want as much information as possible.

      Many people are convicted on eyewitness testimony alone. If that eyewitness is a cop, well... Most small towns in American might as well have the judge, jury and executioner be the same person, because they think alike anyway.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    4. Re:"Throw-down" guns by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I don't have a lot of information on the rest of your claims, but I do know this one to be utter BS, at least where there is at least one honest forensic investigator.

      There was a corrupt Seattle-area police officer who used a variation on this. I can't find the article at the moment, but he told someone he had such a throw-away gun in his trunk, and if they didn't cooperate with him he'd use it to shoot them, leaving no way to trace it back to himself.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "throw-down" gun will generally only have prints on the grip and trigger. A gun owned by a human will have prints all over the place: internal parts (put there when cleaning), magazine/cylinder, even each individual round of ammunition.

      You're assuming that the gun user loads/unloads/maintains/cleans the firearm. Lots of criminals don't do that. Many licensed owners don't either.

    6. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do know this one to be utter BS, at least where there is at least one honest forensic investigator.

      That's a big "if".


      Honest? What about competent?

      See http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/presents/index.rea sonable.doubt.html

      Reasonable Doubt
      Can Crime Labs be Trusted?

      A joint investigation by CNN and the Center for Investigative Reporting examines the lack of standards, quality controls and training at many of the nation's forensic laboratories and raises serious doubts about some forensic scientists.

    7. Re:"Throw-down" guns by operagost · · Score: 1
      Anyway, a scenario, even a tenuous one
      Therefore, being unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, the verdict is NOT GUILTY.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Jerim · · Score: 1

      That lends credibility to "The Shield." In the first episode where they killed their partne, they used the criminals own gun. Obviously knowing that it would have the fingerprints all over it.

    9. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just google for LAPD amd Rampart Scandal

    10. Re:"Throw-down" guns by painehope · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding me? I have to call bullshit on you there, as everyone I know wipes down their entire pistol, inside and out, any time they come in contact with it.


      Every time I clean any of my firearms, I wipe all prints off it. Any time I touch someone else's gun, I wipe all of my prints from it, as you never know what that person will do with it later. It's best to always have a clean firearm, anyways. You never know what will happen. Hell, if someone raped your wife, and you had a chance to kill him, wouldn't you? Of course, you say that's justifiable. Okay, what happens if you do it, and find out the motherfucker is a cop? Do you want to try your luck with the justice system in that case? And before you say it doesn't happen, I know someone who did 27 years for that exact same scenario. If it happened today, he would get the death penalty, but laws were a lot more lenient 30+ years ago ( at least when it came to things like that, if not for drug cases, especially since his wife was beat within an inch of her life by that cop, and it was provable in court, but he still did time since it was a cop ( they decided to prosecute because he used excessive force - meaning he emptied the clip into the bastard - but you know as well as I do that they wouldn't have prosecuted if it wasn't a cop ) ).


      So it's entirely probable to have a pistol with no prints any where other than the grip. Shit, if they wanted to, they could put gloves on the suspect as well. Most DA don't give a shit about processing crooked cops, not does anyone in the public, who go around thinking that everyone the cops arrest must be the bad guys, that cops never lie, falsely arrest, etc. I've seen enough dirty cops ( hell, I've even sold dope to cops before, in my misspent youth ) to know that they're worse than 99% of the "criminals" they arrest ( most of whom are just dopefiends, make stupid mistakes, etc. ).


      Hell, try getting arrested in Harris County, Texas, and then scratch your nose while the Sheriffs are strip-searching you at the county jail. I've seen a guy get half his face smashed in with a baton by a Sheriff for scratching his fucking nose!

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    11. Re:"Throw-down" guns by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      everyone I know wipes down their entire pistol, inside and out, any time they come in contact with it.
      Generally speaking, the only time the dozen or so shooters I personally know, including myself, "wipe down" a firearm is to clean it. Even then, the "wipe down" isn't intended to remove fingerprints, it is to remove residue left from burnt powder and such. So, yes, it is possible to have a print-less firearm, but it is also very unusual.

      Every time I clean any of my firearms, I wipe all prints off it.
      Did you buy any of those from any source other than a private individual who doesn't know your name, with cash? If not, then the gov't already knows who they belong to, or can find out in very short order (call manufacturer, call distributor, call dealer, read dealer's paperwork). No, I don't believe this is proper, but that is the situation at present.

      Hell, if someone raped your wife, and you had a chance to kill him, wouldn't you?
      There are very few instances where someone (a civilian) can use lethal force against another: to stop a felony in progress, to prevent a felon from leaving the scene where he just committed a felony, and when the shooter or another "innocent" near the shooter is in danger of losing their life and/or suffering great bodily harm. There is no legal allowance for after-the-fact vengeance of any sort - you cannot legally hunt someone down and kill them no matter the crime. So, to answer your question, no - that's the police/jury/executioner's job.

      I do not operate under the assumption that the entire local gov't is corrupt. I would hope that in areas where such may be the case that the matter is already known to the local populace and they are actively working to resolve the matter quickly and with appropriate measures. I am well aware that such corruption has happened in the past (and is likely to happen again in the future), but, as you can see, the populace worked it out.
      Therefore, I go about my business as a typical law-abiding citizen, who sees the police and associated gov't as generally and mostly honest, just as I assume most normal people I meet on the street to be. If given cause to think otherwise, I deal with that appropriately, and on a case-by-case basis.

    12. Re:"Throw-down" guns by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Additionally, I don't live in California. I have little information on the local gov't there, but my opinion of what little I know if the state gov't is so low, I won't consider living there for any reason.
      -
      SK

    13. Re:"Throw-down" guns by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the majority of the LAPD is like, but certain members have been caught doing crap often enough that I don't think many folks still hold them in high regard. If you want to live in L.A., work with the system to get the folks in charge to purge the LAPD and come up with an oversight system, maybe even a civilian one, to ensure they've changed their ways. "Better to let ten guilty men go free than to wrongly convict one innocent."

    14. Re:"Throw-down" guns by painehope · · Score: 1
      Well, I obsessively wipe down any pistol I come into contact with, as does everyone I know. Especially if the firearm doesn't belong to me. And when I'm putting a firearm back together after cleaning, I take care to wear gloves of a material that isn't lilely to leave fibers in the gun ( generally disposable latex gloves ).

      As for the federal records, let's just say that if I need a firearm that can't be traced to me, I can get one quite easily. I don't make it a policy of keeping illegal firearms in my possession, but were I to be in the situation that I described to you in my previous post that got my friend serious time, you can bet your ass that that piece would be in pieces, with the barrel filed down, buried in several spots way out in the country. And that dirtbag's body would never be found. I've learned to never trust police, the courts, or the society around me, because even if something isn't your fault, if they can stick it to you, you can bet your ass off they will.

      Now, for justifications of using lethal force, the situation I mentioned was definitely one of those ( I don't know if I made it clear in my previous statement, but basically what happened was that he came home and some guy had beat the hell out of his wife and was still raping her when he walked in, and he put a full clip of bullets into the sick fucker, and then he called the police to report it. When the cops showed up, they realized the guy he had shot was a cop, and they arrested him. I'm not sure how the guy ended up there, he might have been an undercover that they knew ( this guy was an old biker ), or maybe just an acquaintance, but he didn't break into the house ) ). I'm not sure where you got the hunting people down thing from. Though I can promise you that if someone ever seriously hurt a member of my family, I would hunt them and theirs down without a second thought. Hell, I've beat the crap out of people before for bumping into my wife and being rude about it, so imagine my reaction if someone raped her. And, no, I don't think it's wrong. If everyone respects everyone else, the world would be a lot better place, and as far as I'm concerned, some people need their asses kicked.

      As for assuming that the government is corrupt, I live in Houston, Texas, whose legal system and police could give a shit less about things like justice, human rights, and all those other inconvenient liberal ideas that stop them from making money right and left off arresting people too poor, desperate, or stupid to weasel their way out of things. Hell, I went to jail last year because I rented a hotel room for someone and they stole a lamp ( I think it was actually broken and they threw it away, hoping the staff wouldn't notice ). I was charged with felony theft ( a 3rd degree felony ) because the hotel owners claimed that everything was stolen out of the hotel ( fridge, TV, furniture, etc. ). Note that the DA had to know they were lying, because they told the officer who took the report that there was 170 bucks of stuff missing ( no details of what ), then called back days later and said it was 1700 dollars worth of stuff ( conveniently over the 1500 dollar limit necessary to be a felony ), then later on recanted and said that it was about 70 dollars of stuff. The DA still took the case, issued a warrant, I was arrested at the site of a traffic accident ( I had no idea why I was being arrested, and the cop couldn't tell me, except that I had a felony theft warrant ), and I was thrown in jail, with no bond. It took my lawyer a week to get a 40k bond set ( that's right, 40 fucking thousand dollars ), she actually had to threaten to file a writ of habeaus corpus ( that means that you can prove they are unlawfully denying you bail for no good reason ) with the Texas State Supreme Court in order to get this dipshit judge to issue me a bond. I lost my consulting job since I couldn't be at work, and when I finally got out of jail and started fighting the case, the district attorney wouldn't provide the evidence t

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    15. Re:"Throw-down" guns by painehope · · Score: 1
      BTW, I forgot to thank you for the link you provided, it was an interesting read. However, if you think that could happen in America today, you're crazy. These citizens would be labeled as violent ( probably rascist, as that seems to be of the standard media whipping boys ) militia and probably slaughtered wholesale. Hell, the federal government slaughters people who might even be thinking about armed insurrection ( I seem to recall a certain town about 150 miles down the road from me, where they burned a compound to the ground with Bradley tanks - go watch footage from non-American news teams that show the truth, while American news stations said the Waco compound was burned by the occupants ). Another fine example would be Ruby Ridge. I know those are overused examples, but I'm too tired to go dig any more up ( gotta get back to work... ).

      As much as it saddens me to say this, but I think America is too far gone down the road of madness and self-delusion for anything short of a violent revolution to fix this country. The right-wingers are happy to let corporations destroy the economy, the earth, and everything else as long as their fat cat buddies get rich, and the left-wingers are so wacko that they want to give my entire fucking paycheck to immigrants that can't even learn the language, let alone contribute to the society, or to gun-toting gangster wanna-bes with a bunch of gold teeth and crack babies. My children will probably have the dubious pleasure of watching this country disintegrate, a la Roman empire, or burn out in an orgiastic frenzy of fascist warfare, ala Germany.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    16. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree there is a lot of wrong here in the USA. A lot of it is allowed because the media doesn't seem to care about anything approaching objectivity: I watched the Waco fiasco on the TV as I was growing up, and nothing heard then made me realize anything was amiss... I'd always assumed it was just a pack of crazies who were raping children and otherwise being naughty. The truth is a wee bit more complicated, I've learned, no thanks to the mainstream media, whom I've stopped paying attention to in the more recent years.

      There *are* oases of society where the "old values" still exist. Sadly, they are not vast in number. Still, my personal goal is to devise a way to become financially self-sufficient enough to move to one of the two "free states" I have in mind, and work together with like-minded people to keep the system as close to the way the founders of the USA envisioned. The goal being to keep control of at least a few places in the hands of good people who understand how this country should be, according to the Constitution. Start local, and work from there.

      If you're stuck in a place where you sincerely believe the law is scorned by authority, move. Get out while you still can. I'm looking at New Hampshire and/or Wyoming.
      -
      SK

    17. Re:"Throw-down" guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't say I'm suprised. Thankfully, I've never been subject to the attention of the authorities for any reasons, and I intend to keep it that way. I don't have a whole lot of faith in the court, largely for many reasons you cite (especially the $40,000 bond over a matter of, at most, $1700?!, which smacks directly into the rear-end of the Eighth Amendment), but if I do get caught up in such, I plan to fight tooth and nail for the "right" outcome, even if it means persecution and jail time. Similar stories are being told around the 'net, and awareness is slowly growing.

      I guess only time will tell.
      -
      SK

  177. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by Zemran · · Score: 1

    Hey, didn't I see you down at Walmart rubbing blank DVDs all over the stock of jiffy bags?

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  178. Write to Fedex by Benzido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suggest everyone does as I did, and writes to Fedex via the website to protest.

    If they are in fact allowing a private commercial interest to open up the packages of unconsenting customers, they deserve a full boycott.

    There are other good alternatives to Fedex.

    1. Re:Write to Fedex by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      For anyone too lazy to want to find the link, here's the form :

      Email FedEx

      This is the link for the US.

      The rest of you will have to go to Fedex.com, click Customer Support, under Fedex Express / Fedex Ground use the drop-down for email.

      Yeah, I'm karma whoring. But at least the information is useful.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:Write to Fedex by TitsNbeer · · Score: 0

      http://www.fedex.com/us/customersupport/express/co ntactus.html?link=4 they got bunches of email addresses at that URL. bombard the shit out of em y'all I've already sent a couple dozen. inquiry@fedex.com, ukmaster@fedex.com, eumaster@fedex.com

  179. dumb economics to fedex anyway by steve_l · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would you fedex pirate dvds? its a premium service and now you know they even sniff your luggage. Go use the mainstream postal service instead.

    This new program will help defend small homegrown uk and eu DVD printing presses from the competition of those evil third-world pirates who dont treat their employees with the same respect or salaries.

  180. If they had any sense by PurPaBOO · · Score: 1

    They'd train the dogs to detect only pirated DVDs.

    --
    If it weren't for the rocks in its bed, the stream would have no songs.
    1. Re:If they had any sense by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Considering the breed of animal they're using, I think they'd have better luck with this than the RIAA at training its "breed" to detect only pirated music on the internet.

      Maybe if the RIAA used Snausages in their training too, they'd have better luck.

  181. QUICK! by crache · · Score: 1

    someone make a video simulation of goatse!

    (no thumnails please)

  182. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by iogan · · Score: 1

    I think the most effective strategy would be to burn actual movies whose copyright has expired from archive.org and labeling them something like btlegmovrip3241.avi. Imagine how much fun they would have trying to determine the copyright status of all these movies.

    I have a few expired copyright and (cc) movies up @ http://widescopes.net/ if you can't be bothered to wait for the download from archive.org (which can be slow). The site is a project I never got round to finishing.

  183. International packages only by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure they're only sniffing International packages (hence HM Customs being involved), because those are pulled to the side for customs to deal with anyways. Or at least thats what happened when I worked for UPS. You're right on one thing though, there is NO way this would apply to domestic packages. They move WAY too fast, and there is just WAY too much content to sift through. Even a "small" center like where I worked at would do several thousand packages a night (usually two 36 foot trailers full, sometimes three). And major hubs tend to be automated, with no room for people much less dogs. They're going after big international shipments, and honestly i'd be suprised if they found much.

    PS: You're insane to ship anything softer than a cast-iron safe through UPS. Seriously.

    1. Re:International packages only by nsmike · · Score: 1

      PS: You're insane to ship anything softer than a cast-iron safe through UPS. Seriously.

      Oh, believe me, the same is true of FedEx. I've seen more than one Alienware tower dropped from a height of several feet on to the concrete floor of our terminal.

  184. Pepper and itching powder by min0r_threat · · Score: 1

    I'm going to cover future DVDs with pepper and itching powder, so when those pesky sniffer dogs stick their moist snout in my private property they'll get a lesson in how olfactory senses can rebel.

    --
    ~~~~~~~~~ "I must create my own system, or be enslav'd by another man's." William Blake, Jerusalem.
  185. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this seemingly also happened on the ferry crossing from Vancouver Island in Canada.. Since VI is where a lot of the pot in Canada is grown, it tends to come over on the ferry, so the cops are on the boat with dogs. However, Canadian law doesn't let them detain and search your car solely on the say-so of a dog, so they radio ahead for a warrant to be prepared, and then search the car when it comes off the ferry.

    Some enterprising islanders struck on the idea of strolling around the car-deck on the boat with plant-misters full of dilute cannabis solution, casually spraying the whole deck. Since everything now reeks of weed, the dogs were no use at all..

  186. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll probably end up spending over $10,000 per package by calling in the MPAA, the RIAA, the NSA, the CIA, and the DHS. After a few dozen false alarms, maybe they'll learn to stop invading customer privacy.

    No, they'll also force through legislation that requires that YOU reimburse them for the money wasted searching your non-copyright-infringing burned DVD.
    Damned if you do...etc.

    1. Get your pet Congress-critter to make laws enforcing and extending your copyright
    2. Let it be known on Slashdot so all the geeks try to find ways around it
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!!!

  187. Wide bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a suitcase with a thousand DVDs

    There was a quote like "Don't understimate the bandwidth of a 747 loaded with tapes".

  188. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Bigos · · Score: 1

    It's more likely that after few dozens of false alarms they will start suing people for wasting RIAA time :-D

  189. Re:Meanwhile... (OT here but whatev's) by nugneant · · Score: 1

    IANAnAlcoholic... but from my limited experience, it has to do with a fear people have of saying or doing things that don't make any sense. Basically "knowledge is power" and all that - ie "if I were to suddenly stand up and scream 'RAUNCHY COWBOYSH GO AMERICAN ELEPHANTSHHHHohgodiatehamagain', then vomit all over myself normally, people might call the cops and get me put under 72 hour observation. If I tell them I'm drunk/stoned/tripping balls/whatever beforehand, tho, then they'll at least understand it's just the whiskey/marijuana/acid/week-old-foot-fungus causing a chemical reaction in my brain".

    FWIW, I used to feel the same way as you - but now (uh, thanks to a friend's word-of-mouth (cough)) I see from both sides of the fence.

  190. Re:New product oppurtunity ;) by z0idberg · · Score: 1

    Now, off to my lab to synth some "Pirated DVD Smell" to spray on ALL of my mail/packages!

    Even better, you just need a contact in Fedex to spray all the fedex address labels with it before they are even sent out to the regional offices and used on the packages. Then not only yours, but everyones packages get the speical treatment.

  191. They didn't think this through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to start a business and train dogs to sniff out peer-to-peer ip packets.

  192. Dogs to sniff content data for child pornography by rawwa.venoise · · Score: 1

    So if this goes into work FedEx will start to be responsible by all the content transmited by them. In my point of view this is similar to the Internet carrier. You're not responsible by the transmitted content since you're not allowed to check what's inside of it. If they really start this way they must be held responsible by all nasty contents like child pornography and so on.

    next:
    Dogs to sniff content data for child pornography

  193. Send Backup Tape by SurfSlade · · Score: 1

    Why send DVD when you can send a Ultrium LTO 3 Back up tape containing 80+ ripped movies (with menu and everything).

    Add password to your back-up and name it Weekly back-up of 05/08/2006

    You will never get caught.....

    Plus you will save on Shipping cost

    1. Re:Send Backup Tape by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You know, there are some serious evil geniuses here on /.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  194. Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when some corp worker sends a DVD to his collige with FedEx there will be about half dosen guys who will see that top secret DVD. I wonder when it lead to some espionage charges.

  195. Musings by Stanislav_J · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When I saw the headline, I thought sure this HAD to be a hose. Is it any wonder April 1st isn't as big a deal as it used to be -- what with reality becoming more and more absurd, satire just can't compete any more.

    I wonder, do the dogs give a stronger reaction to movies like Gigli, Waterworld, or The Postman? Hell, you don't need dogs -- I could smell those stinkers a mile away.

    Just goes to show to how great a degree private industry and big corporations have this administration in their back pocket. I mean, think of the cost and expense of training these dogs, the man-hours involved, the delay of legitimate shipments, the questionable nature of the searches, and all at the behest of a PRIVATE industry trade group. It boggles the mind.

    All the more imperative that the master geeks get cracking on that Star Trek Transporter techonology, so you can beam your contraband directly to the recipient.

    --
    "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
  196. I feel like doing something I planned for a while by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll package some fleas with some CDs.

    Hey, did I ASK you to open my private mail?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  197. UK Importing by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Informative
    The problem with this is that the signal/noise ratio is really low.

    Drugs are illegal, which means that a dog can sniff it. Simply, it's illegal.

    Importing DVDs of many sorts into the UK is legal. We also have a huge amount of importing going on because of certain restrictions on sales of DVDs.

    To sell a DVD of a movie in the UK, you need a license from the BBFC that costs a load of cash (like thousands of pounds per movie). R1 discs are not submitted for license, and so cannot be sold here (by retail or mail order). But the law allows for a workaround, that customers can import any movie from abroad, as long as it isn't in certain banned categories.

    So, companies exist who provide cheaper, or earlier release discs, and mail out from other countries. All completely legitimate.

    Finding a pirate DVD amongst this lot is like looking for a needle in a haystack. If it's too successful, the pirates will just start manufacturing here instead.

  198. Sniffing your sectors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That just sounds filthy.

  199. Smell? by zaguar · · Score: 1

    Do they smell the sea water?

    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
  200. well, the dog and the throwaway gun things by alizard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    seem reasonable enough. I've seen references to the throwaway gun for years and years, and with respect to the dogs, all one has to know is that any system that can be easily abused WILL be abused.

    With respect to DVD pricing and piracy... if you can find a double-sided DVD-R at a reasonable price, I'd like to know where, the pricing I've seen is in the >$5 range. It's either that or pick and choose tracks using DVD-shrink... while the disk may be 25 cents, my time is worth something.

    While you may not like DVD pricing, DVD piracy is NOT a serious problem in the USA because DVD movies, unlike music CDs just aren't all that expensive if you don't insist on movies newly released on DVD.

    The hysteria about piracy is mainly so the movie industry can plug all Internet distribution channels they don't control, in order to freeze independents out.

    They know as well as we do that we're only a few years away from making movies technically equivalent to current Hollywood product (NO, I DON'T MEAN LOTR, that's another few years) on conventional desktop PCs.

    It's about control. They want to be able to say to people who want to sell movies to the public "Do it our way or not at all."

    Any resemblance between this and the record industry, of course, is purely coincidental.

    1. Re:well, the dog and the throwaway gun things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we are close. A good semi-pro camera is only $4000.

    2. Re:well, the dog and the throwaway gun things by dbrutus · · Score: 1
      Not $4k, under $3k and dropping...

      From the Apple store:

      Canon GL2 Mini DV Camcorder
      Incorporating precision optics, superior digital processing, and a sleek innovative design, the Canon GL2 offers reliable professional performance. The GL2 gives you the ability to take your videos to new levels, whether you're a video professional or simply a highly discerning hobbyist.

      Price: $2,799.95

  201. Please DO recommend them by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I wanna see them writhe when you slap a multi-million dollar suit on them for illegaly opening. Or at least the press info that FedEx arbitrarily opens and searches their customer's shipments.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  202. Legality only matters when someone complains by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Let's face the facts here. "Legal" is one thing, but nobody gives a rat's behind about legality as long as nobody complains and actually takes action against illegal activities. If a store owner would not take action against thieves, he'd be sitting alone in his store without any goods to sell pretty soon.

    It's the same here. Nobody complains that they're opening the mail, so it doesn't really matter if it's legal. So pick up the news, tell your friends. Tell your employer what FedEx allows some random interest group to do with your mail, and ask him whether he'd enjoy using a courier that doesn't care about its client's rights.

    Companies don't care about the law any more than the average Joe does. Probably, they care less. They only start to care as soon as it starts to get into the way of profit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  203. The keyword is CUSTOMS by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    When you send mail to a foreign country, the GOVERNMENT there (and yours) is allowed to check the mail. This is all right. The government, which is at least in theory working in my interest, makes sure that duties are paid and that nothing "Illegal" is shipped into the country. That's the government's biz. It's their job.

    Now, when did this right to inspect incoming and outgoing commodities get extended to companies and special interest groups?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The keyword is CUSTOMS by Gorthax · · Score: 1

      federal express is in bed with customs, the distro centers handeling international shipments occupy the same sites that handle domestics. Customs authorits goes far beyond, or rather much farther in than the border

  204. One Step Later : by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Placement of resident "observers" in family houses to ensure people do not lend cds to each other and no more than 5 people listen to the same music at a time in a party.

  205. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Good ciphertext looks like random data. Random data looks like good ciphertext. You may never be able to prove that it's not ciphertext. Then they tell the jury that you used "weapons-grade encryption" to facilitate your evil schemes.

  206. MOD PARENT UP by alizard · · Score: 1

    just remember that the dogs will only pick up on recordable C/DVDs.

  207. WTF? What about my home movies? by Builder · · Score: 1

    I regularly ship DVD's from the UK back to South Africa. My folks and some of my friends are still on dialup, so downloading 80MB .mov files of my vacation or skydiving movies just isn't an option for them.

    I own the copyright on those movies. What right does someone else have to watch that without my permission? And if they don't watch it, how do they know if it is legit content or pirate ?

  208. Why doesn't the MPAA just go after the cartels? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

    Or would that do too much to jeapordize US trade with the countries that allow it? Instead they go after the little guys and probably the little people who can't recognize a counterfeit DVD.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  209. I've heard of this happening by accident by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rumor warning: I don't have a cite for this.

    Supposedly, the dogs get a treat when they make a bust.

    A coke-sniffing dog found a deeply buried shipment of cocaine. The dog got a treat. The contraband was inside a large shipment of coffee.

    The dog got a treat the next time it alerted. It found another coke shipment. Unfortunately, this one was in another coffee shipment.

    The poor dog, ever after, would alert on anything that smelled like coffee and would wait eagerly for a treat.

  210. There could be a use for this by sjonke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dogs like to sniff dog butts. Perhaps, then, they can detect all the crappy movies the MPAA is making and put them into the "lost pile", along with my luggage.

    --
    --- What?
  211. uhh... no by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Where'd you get this? Why would an illegally owned firearm necessarily have been given so much attention? The "perp" could have picked it up just recently, all the prints could be nothing but smudges, etc. Any firearm, for that matter.

    Besides, if no prints are found on the ammo, or on the rest of the gun, then... Then someone was careful about getting prints on their illegal firearm, that doesn't at all indicate the officer did it.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:uhh... no by kryptx · · Score: 1

      Guns aren't like most weapons (bats, knives, IEDs, etc.) in that they are registered. Every gun has a history. If these cops do use throw away weapons, it must have a history that's been manufactured in some way or another (to make it reasonable for the jury to believe that the victim had it in his possession at the time), which means it must be official department policy to do so, which should be easy enough to find out and publically reveal.

      --
      Mods: Do you disagree with me? Go ahead and mod me down. Meta-mods will sort it out. Good luck!
  212. MPAA need a geography lesson.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "United Kingdom, Los Angeles - - The Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT)....."

    Since when did the UK become a district of Los Angeles? And they say standards are declining in Amercian skools. Better get the students focusing on useful things like Intelligent Design.

  213. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put a female dog in the package, too. Or a cat.

  214. Thanks MPAA by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

    Thanks to you, I promise to rip even more DVDs this year. I will expand into movies I do not even like. There is no way in hell this is even legal. Notice they did it in the UK and not the US. Screwing with the mail in US is a jailable felony. Since when did the MPAA become a law enforcement agency? MPAA are a pack of fucktards.

  215. Trade just a little bit of your privacy for...... by magisterx · · Score: 1

    This is insane. I expect FedEx to have a much better reason before they invade my privacy by opening a package I sent.

    Our society is trading its privacy a little bit at a time, and this time we can't even pretend we are getting security out from it.

  216. Dogs by certel · · Score: 1

    Sniff out DVD's? What on a DVD makes it leave a trail of smell that a dog can detect?

  217. Just the facts, maam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "United Kingdom, Los Angeles - - The Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), express delivery company FedEx and HM Revenue & Customs, has joined forces to launch an exciting new initiative to help combat DVD piracy.

    Thieft? Do they mean that I can somehow take their copyright away and sue THEM?

    When you have to base your arguments on verbal trickery, you've already lost any intellectual argument. Calling copyright infringement "thieft" shows anyone with an IQ over 70 that they're grasping at straws. Poor fools.

    The bigger fools are FexEx. I'll no longer use FedEx for anything whatever - except, perhaps, buying blank DVDs and CDs. And when they open the package, there's going to be a lawsuit, all right - I'll be the plaintiff.

    Retirement, here I come!

    -mcgrew

  218. typical morons by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Yeah right. I can see the dogs sniffing 2000000000 dvds

    People will import till theres no tommorow, and if the 'sniffing' gets too much, they will download.

    Get a clue, you cannot fight the will of the people. Your job as a 'enforcement agent' with stupid K9s is a farce
    Its not a real job, you do not contribute to the GDP and anything meaningfull. Did you code a game ? did you
    make music, or do graphics, or drive a fork lift? no.

    Time to wrap dvds in beef jerky sense.

    Get a clue enforcement people. Its all 'perceptions' and we know it. If X person loses a box of dvds due to confiscation
    then that said person will just try again or download the copies, you cannot win against the populace, no govt ever has, eventually
    the people power wins.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  219. Self destruction DVD by leabre · · Score: 1

    Just wait until self-destructing DVD's become mainstream, by the time you get the DVD you won't be able to view it anymore, all this because they sniffed a legitimate DVD. I wonder if lawsuits will ensue.

    Thanks,
    Leabre

  220. the world is dumb by Good+Gravy · · Score: 1

    Counterfeit clothing is just as much a problem as counterfeit DVDs. Someone should really start training sniffer dogs to sniff out people hiding clothes in their luggage.

    Is it just me or is the world getting dumber by the minute?

  221. wtf is wrong with my Dog... by Siberwulf · · Score: 1

    So, they can teach a dog to sniff out DVDs, drugs, people, and anything else under the sun.

    I can't get my dog to stop crapping on the floor when it wants to eat, even with the back door wide open.

  222. DDOS drug meuls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how big drug cartels import cocain on planes, though its better to do it on barges labeled, "toxic waste"

    1. have a looser transport 2kg cocain thats totally insecure, have it be the decoy
    2. have a businessman/fake military guy transport 70kg of cocain in a fake body bag/coffin for the army.
    3. profit, no searches, decoy gets busted, $50k cost nothing compared to the $30m profit.

    Btw the CIA makes most deals in cocaine, only decoys get caught the rest are oppertunists.

    1. Re:DDOS drug meuls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've seen "Blow" one too many times.

  223. The world on time... by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

    So that's why my replacement power module has been sitting in the St. Louis Fedex facility since Monday. Who knew?

    --
    --Insert catchy .sig line here--
  224. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My choice would be "Rreefer Madness," the film that got pot outlawed and caused your grandpa to lose a right you never had. But I have a strange sense of humor.

  225. thing twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you beast

  226. Tell FedEx what you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send them feedback at https://www.fedex.com/cgi-bin/qrf2.cgi?first=y&for mpage=general

    Tell 'em you're using UPS from now on unless they tell the MPAA to go screw.

  227. Just encrypt the contents by Falcon611 · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Obtain DVD+-R
    Step 2: Encrypt mi3.mpg/bumFights.avi/midgetPorn.avi or ISO with GnuPG or TrueCrypt, as data[x].gpg
    Step 3: Label DVD `Data'
    Step 4: Profit.

    It's the first thing I thought before I even opened the thread. A disc through the mail is what we call an *insecure interface*. /In Aus here, so it's Somebody Else's Problem

  228. Damage to legit purchases by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

    A while back, I ordered an indie movie on DVD from the States (I live in Canada), as this was the only way that I could get a legit copy. The DVD cost me $20 USD, plus delivery, plus customs, so it came to something like $45 CAD. It also took 8 weeks to arrive. After going through all that, when I finally opened the package, I discovered that Customs had opened it first with an x-acto knife or some such and had sliced through part of the DVD cover and packaging. Needless to say, after having gone through this whole rigamarole to get the bloody DVD and spending a fair chunk of change, I was pissed that it had arrived damaged.

    What will happen in the States when a large number of packages containing DVDs (most of which I would guess are totally legit) are opened in order to check for pirated content? When X number of packages are opened every day by bored employees doing extremely repetitive work, I would guess that the amount of damage will increase significantly. I don't know about everyone else, but to me the mail is already too prone to damaging the stuff you send out. Do we really need yet another step in which our packages can be damaged?

  229. The war on DVDs by mdboyd · · Score: 1

    I guess it's time to smuggle those DVDs in coffee grounds...

    Seriously though, this has to be a publicity stunt to scare those pirating DVDs. The article doesn't say how many dogs are being trained to do this. It only says that two has been trained.

    There is no way the dogs can tell what is on the DVDs that they're sniffing out (whether it's family home movies or a rip of Mission Impossible 3) unless they have frickin' laser beams attached to their heads. Is this a flat out attack on our rights by the MPAA? What right do they have to go through our mail? What if every software company starts going through mail looking for pirated software. That's kind of ridiculous.

  230. Still trying to wrap my mind around this by DesertWolf0132 · · Score: 1

    So, lets pretend for a moment the MPAA actually gets carriers like FedEX to do this here in the USA. Pretend further they buy a judge or two and have this listed as constitutional. I burn a DVD of my kid's school talent show and to be witty title it similarly to a current movie. I send it to my family and MPAA thugs find it. Would they actually watch it to verify it was a pirated film or simply confiscate it and send their lawyers to sue me for copyright violation?

    Every day I see more and more why the founding fathers of this nation rose up and revolted. Boston DVD Party anyone?

    --
    No animals were harmed in the making of this sig.
    Well, there was that one puppy, but he is all better now.
  231. inquiry@fedex.com, ukmaster@fedex.com by TitsNbeer · · Score: 0

    inquiry@fedex.com, ukmaster@fedex.com, eumaster@fedex.com
    Instead of just complaining here lets let them know

  232. The MPAA did something useful?! by egarland · · Score: 1

    It's about a day too late for anyone to moderate anything up and nobody will ever read this so I won't be diplomatic.

    What the hell is wrong with you all!

    This is the CORRECT way to fight DVD piracy.

    Here are INCORRECT ways: Throwing people in jail for making it so you can play DVD's on Linux. Cramming DRM and TCPA down our throats. Screwing up 80 years of open standards by forcing encrypion on every device that is capable of displaying a movie.

    For once these guys got it right!

    Congratulations MPAA, for the first time in modern memory you've actually done something of value to your member companies that doesn't screw us, their customers. Well done! Keep it up.

    --
    set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
  233. My Rights ONLINE? by Illbay · · Score: 1
    So this is about detection of DVDs etc. that are being physically transported (e.g. airline luggage).

    WTF does this have to do with "my rights online"?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  234. Best DVD-R brand to buy according to illegal site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not detected
    - CristalX
    - GoldPlusSerie
    - Another temporary DVD-R brand

    50% detected
    - genuine DVD movies

    100% detected
    - sony
    - phillips
    - maxwell

  235. The results are amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny how these two statements contradict.

    "this is the first time dogs have been used anywhere in the world to search for counterfeit DVDs and the results were amazing."

    yet,

    "so far no discs with pirated movies have been found."

    I mean, what's up with that? they haven't even found any discs, all they've done so far is snoop through some personal mail that contained completely legit material.

  236. Why ship the DVD? by octopus72 · · Score: 1

    If it can be downloaded.
    And btw. how they can have right to strip the envelope and check the content of the disc? It can contain freeware or even private data (photos, home videos, amateur porn...)

  237. Why the hell was the parent modded FUNNY?!? by redmond_herring · · Score: 1

    I would have thought insightful would have been more accurate...

    --
    Stephen Colbert on race: "While skin and race are often synonymous, skin cleansing is good, race cleansing is bad."
  238. Probable Cause to seach whose property? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This mirrors the Common Carrier argument on Internet. If telcos want to control who uses their bandwidth, then (./ says) they are responsible for the crimes, like kiddie porn.

    So, why should UPS guard illegal drugs or copyright infingements for their customers? Wouldn't UPS become liable for the activities then?

  239. crazy ideas by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

    You can easily DDoS the system by shipping a blank DVD in every FedEx package.

    If the dogs are sniffing the chemicals in recordable DVDs, a broken one should smell *really* good...

    No. No reasonable person would willingly do this to themselves.

    Why would I want to increase the likelihood of Customs tearing apart my parcel? Have fun shipping static-sensitive, sealed or fragile material. When Customs cuts the packing tape, they can easily manhandle the contents.

    I've seen some impressive damage: like a thick solid metal rod broken in half. I assume they just dropped it from a decent height. If they can stuff it all back into the box, broken or not, what do they care? It's all part of the inspection process to them.

    Either way, using your example you're advertising that a disc is in there somewhere, and they'll want to find it. I assume that your gripe is with the MPAA/RIAA but this action only inconveniences you and Customs, not the MPAA/RIAA.

    Oh I get it, your /. UID is "surprise_audit".

    --
    This is not my sig.
  240. High-Def Dogs by Smilodon · · Score: 1

    Will they have to have special "high-definition" dogs to sniff out the HD-DVD or Blueray discs?

    Better yet, can they develop a dog that can smell which format is going to win out in the end?

    Actually, I belive the dogs were actually "triggering" on idiocy. They were either getting false triggers on the dingbats who thought this whole thing up, or were using exclusively Adam Sandler movies as a test article...

  241. Wow, another tax write-off for "the war on piracy" by vprasad · · Score: 1

    How much is this going to cost them, so then they can claim financial losses (despite consistently rising sales figures) on piracy?

  242. Jack Bauer doesn't need DVD's... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    He just tortures an MPAA executive until he tells him how the movie ends.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  243. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by Wolfger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Imagine how much fun they would have trying to determine the copyright status of all these movies.
    I'm trying to imagine that, but I just can't. Instead, I keep imagining that they will waste my time and money right along with their own by filing a lawsuit against me. Even a groundless lawsuit can be expensive to the defendant, and the MPAA has more than enough money and lawyers to just sue everybody in sight, and see what pans out. You know... the RIAA business model!
  244. As a former FedEx employee... by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

    I say "AAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!" They're using 2 dogs for how many tonnes of freight? How many thousands of locations around the world? I seriously doubt there's enough police dogs in the world to search a sizeable amount of the frieght that FDX handles. The only time a handler is going to care about your contraband is when you're dumb enough to pack it in something flimsy and they have to clean it up/report it.

    --
    We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
  245. Fight Back! by WizADSL · · Score: 1

    In case anyone else starts doing this too, I'm putting a blank DVD (maybe a CD will work too) in EVERYTHING I ship, if enough people do the same, it won't be worth their time. I feel sorry for the dogs!

  246. Sony Prison slogan by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    Sony Prison: face the music.

  247. Carnival Booth? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
    You can easily DDoS the system by shipping a blank DVD in every FedEx package.

    Even better, while giving the adversary some additional workout, by using tamper-evident packaging you can easily discern if the given package was opened or not. By statistical processing of a large number of such shipment, and cross-correlating with the age (important for outgassing of the volatile components in the plastics), type, and packaging style of the disc, we may be able to find points of low efficiency in their system. Essentially a reapplication of the Carnival Booth algorithm.

  248. My DVD Experiences in the Philippines. by eBayDoug · · Score: 0

    I am wondering how much "questionably illegal" DVD's cost in the states? In the Philippines they are 75 pesos when you buy 10. That's $1.50 each. They work always because if they don't they will let you return them for exchange. The fun part is when you go DVD shopping, you end up in a room about 100'X 100' with 15 individual DVD sellers. Every second they yell, DVD sir, DVD, DVD, DVD, sir, dvd, dvd. It's like dude, I know that! I am surrounded by 10,000 friggin DVD's! FYI a beer is 60 cents and a pack of Marlboro smokes is 64 cents! Do they sell DVD's on the streets of Manhattan?

    --
    Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
    1. Re:My DVD Experiences in the Philippines. by vpalexander · · Score: 1

      Aye, mate, it's a vicious war of entrepetude. Society has collapsed in upon itself, like a black hole garnering its pretties. We are all in a socio-economical wash of self-pity and pereulism; soon it will get down to guns and ammo (nobody even thought to freeze the butter).

  249. Your problem may be bigger than you think by alizard · · Score: 1
    Is any information you gather in video preparation or that you send to clients confidential?

    If your shipping vendor is inspecting material at random on any other basis, you CAN NOT guarantee confidentiality. Period. Not having drugs in your shipments no longer guarantees even a reasonable probability of the data on shipped disks being confidential.

    While telling FedEx you aren't doing business anymore and telling them why would be a good thing, I think your solution is going to have to be encryption. Password protected zipfiles is probably adequate, or look into other crypto solutions like PGP/GPG.

  250. Definitely funny. This guy deserves 2b modded up! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    I would do it myself and I even have mod points but for obvious reasons I can't. Sony Prison: Face the Music :-)

  251. Re: Blank? Why not 9.4GB of /dev/urandom? :) by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

    > slip a blank ( convienently labeled, "MI-III" ) with everything they ship

    Instead of sending a blank, why not just burn 9.4GB of /dev/urandom onto the disk. They'll probably end up spending over $10,000 per package by calling in the MPAA, the RIAA, the NSA, the CIA, and the DHS. After a few dozen false alarms, maybe they'll learn to stop invading customer privacy.


    Dear AC,

    What a great idea! We would really like to discuss this further. We will get back to you as soon as we hear from your ISP.

    The NSA

    --
    Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
  252. bullshit by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    That's bullshit. A gun has no "history" unless it is legally registered. There are millions of unregistered firearms in the U.S. alone. Any cop is going to be able to get his hands on an unregistered firearm, as that is what a lot of perps deal in.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:bullshit by kryptx · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the ambiguous response; it wasn't my intention to elicit such a vehemently explicit objection. Let me be more clear and hopefully we (read: you) can be a little more civil about it, eh?

      There are a number of reasons why we can be reasonably certain that it is not commonplace for cops to carry throwaways and plant them when they accidentally shoot someone. I'm not saying none of them do, but I am saying it's not acceptable behavior in any precinct.

      * Every gun does have a history, which is searchable by its serial number. When there is no serial number they use a detailed description of the weapon. Even if it has never been registered, the cops can find out from where it was originally purchased or stolen. If the gun was subsequently recovered by police in an official manner, that event is also tied to the serial number. So a cop carrying a gun either A) has confiscated a weapon and failed to note it (which could very well lead to his termination), or B) has taken it after completion of a prior investigation, in which case the gun's record is inextricably tied to police work. If it was a "throwaway", a simple investigation into the history of the gun would necessarily fail to lead back to the victim (and if it was confiscated properly, it would lead to the police).

      * Most (no, not all) guns are registered or have been registered at some point, which enhances the information acquired from the history when searched.

      * Particularly if the victim has no violent history, his family and friends will be outraged by the story and bring charges against the cop, testifying in that the victim did not own a gun. If it's made clear by prosecuting attorneys that they believe the weapon was a throwaway, the defense must specifically address that possibility and show that the gun was tied to the victim some other way. Of course with a jury you still have to cope with reasonable doubts and the fact that the defendant is a cop will help his case, but what I'm suggesting is that the possibility of life imprisonment under such circumstances should discourage this behavior. Cops are not superhuman and they are interested in continuing their careers just like you and I.

      * Carrying an unregistered firearm is a misdemeanor and could end their career if it was brought to light. Carrying a firearm whose serial number has been tampered with is an additional offense. Are we to believe that it is commonplace for police to put their careers in jeopardy so that they can cover up a mistake that should never even happen?

      --
      Mods: Do you disagree with me? Go ahead and mod me down. Meta-mods will sort it out. Good luck!