Absolutely right, with the paper voting system, each vote is scrutinized by a representative of each party. So, you need to have opponents to be part of the same conspiracy to elect only one of them.
No contradiction. The first sentence emphasize the fact they are using readily available LEDs without any modification to them. Making sure the reader doesn't think they are using a new type of LEDs. The second sentence state beside the LEDs themselves, you need something to modulate the signal and link to the wired network and/or computer. The second sentence would have been sufficient to explain that entirely, but I guess they were so often asked it they were using new, special, specific purpose LEDs they decided to emphasize they weren't.
And I suppose the redundancy LED lights is simply to emphasize this could be the office lights if they are LED based.
Provided the stupid guys are using IE.
Provided they are aware the smart guys are using Opera.
Provided they are stupid.
Provided stupids are the mass.
Then, the stupid guys will switch to Opera over the next years in the hope to become smart or at least look smart.
The next study will then show us stupid peoples are using Opera.
Are you telling me all these nice butterflies and cockroaches used to run all these high-tech scientific experiments in microgravity will die?
Seriously, the author is ending TFA saying serious exploration cannot be done without manned flights. About all we know about space and solar system is from probes and satellites. The science done in the ISS summarizes to toy experiments and work to maintain itself. No surprise there is no immediate plans to replace the ISS, its value is about null from a scientific point of view. And the future of man in space summarize to going to the moon for an honeymoon if you are a billionaire or die during a journey to mars.
AI is not about finding an algorithm to beat the machine, it should be about an algorithm that can learn while playing an improving itself until it can beat the machine. This is AI. Finding and programming an algorithm beating the machine isn't AI, it is real intelligence since the programmer has done all the work until his/her algorithm effectively beat the machine.
Much longer, since Opportunity has already do it while manned mission is still impossible. By the time a manned mission to Mars would be possible, we could have done much more with many Opportunity(ies). And at least, one way mission doesn't pose any ethic problem and we can go much more farther than any manned mission could dream, like interstellar space where Voyager 1 and 2 are now still sending scientific data after 30 years and will continue to do it for another 10 years or so before the energy source will exhaust.
You just cannot dream doing the same with a manned mission. And sustaining life has an energy cost along the path.
You missed the point. The problem is not gestures themselves, it is the lack of standards. The same gesture doesn't trigger the same kind of action across applications creating confusion in users' minds.
Well, you should distinguish between manned and unmanned space exploration. While unmanned space exploration has proven itself very useful on both scientific and industrial returns on investment, it is a complete other story about manned space exploration. Most of the work done by sending people in space could have been done with unmanned vehicules as well. It is much more costly to send humans in space, we should expect a significant higher return on investment. This is not the case. And to prove that point, space exploration has become a kind of tourism and space agencies are lurking at this market to value the space program. Instead of wasting money and resources in manned space exploration, we should rather than put these resources into unmanned space exploration.
I think the whole point from the author is to value all these pixels on his screen. That is the rational behind his article. Personnally, I just don't care wasting pixels on my screen as long as the job is done efficiently, what the command line most often does just fine with great flexibility and many options for those with enough knowledge of the Unix shell and all the powertools coming with it.
So, my recommendation to this guy would be to buy himself a cheap dumb ASCII terminal and stop whining about wasting pixels on his screen.
find a never ending source of energy to sustain life on the vessel described at point four for at least the number of millenium it will take to head it somewhere across the interstellar space. I should remind everyone the Voyager 1 and 2 probes are now at the very limit of the solar system after a 30 years journey and still emitting a radio signal sending scientific data relying on a Pu238 nuclear energy source which will be at end in about 10 years. At this time, the Voyager 1 and 2 will navigate silently forever the interstellar space at the fastest speed possible using the slingshot effect, but still 40 thousands years away from any other star in this galaxy. So, the question is: How would you sustain life into a vessel travelling interstellar space? Hence, number third and half, which has for corollary if we are to discover any mean of doing this, our energy problem here, on earth, is resolved forever.
In conclusion, when Obama approved the operation, he didn't tell anyone OBL should be captured alive if possible or he simply asked specifically he wants him dead? That makes a lot of difference about the White-House rethoric around this operation. There is good reasons to want him dead, but asking him dead is really different from asking to capture him from the presidential point of view. Asking him dead, is denying him any rights to a trial and judging him a priori.
So, the official version rebuilt using images from recording cameras sticked on the helmets of the commando is: OBL quit the first floor to hide in his spouses room at the second floor where the commando finds him. He was shot in the thorax and then, a second commando member shoot him in the head. He was disarmed and seems not to resist in anyway.
The conclusion seems obvious to me, they never try to get him alive, the orders were to kill him.
Why not just sending probes and f... robots? And, btw, I am asking you the same question I asked to icebraining below: Where do you plan to get the energy to sustain life in the middle of no where without a star at proximity and having exhausted you plutonium 238 reserves?
So, why not just send probes and robots? How do you plan to sustain life, I mean were do you plan to get energy to sustain it while in the middle of nowhere without a star at proximity and having exhausted your plutonium 238 reserves? Let me think, you plan to do a big fire camp with everything that can be burn at hand.
IIRC, the Apollo astronauts were selected because they were good pilots, not scientists or mathematicians.
Nope! They were selected because they can talk while the chimps cannot. At that time, submariners, F1 pilots, miners and other peoples acustomed to live in a confined environments were potential candidates. However, since the rocket was expected to fly, the airforce pilots argues the candidates should be selected among them. But, basically, talking was barely enough.
Slashdot Mirror
Absolutely right, with the paper voting system, each vote is scrutinized by a representative of each party. So, you need to have opponents to be part of the same conspiracy to elect only one of them.
Randi Zuckerburg thinks you should provide your fingerprints to enter the Internet.
No contradiction. The first sentence emphasize the fact they are using readily available LEDs without any modification to them. Making sure the reader doesn't think they are using a new type of LEDs. The second sentence state beside the LEDs themselves, you need something to modulate the signal and link to the wired network and/or computer. The second sentence would have been sufficient to explain that entirely, but I guess they were so often asked it they were using new, special, specific purpose LEDs they decided to emphasize they weren't.
And I suppose the redundancy LED lights is simply to emphasize this could be the office lights if they are LED based.
Provided they are aware the smart guys are using Opera.
Provided they are stupid.
Provided stupids are the mass.
Then, the stupid guys will switch to Opera over the next years in the hope to become smart or at least look smart.
The next study will then show us stupid peoples are using Opera.
Shut up stupid!
Antisemitism was rather than heavily influenced by a fraudulent document entitled: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
The document is still distributed today as a genuine document.
"the 'ability to work under pressure when the traders are screaming at you' is a must-have skill." So, being deaf is a plus on your CV.
Are you telling me all these nice butterflies and cockroaches used to run all these high-tech scientific experiments in microgravity will die? Seriously, the author is ending TFA saying serious exploration cannot be done without manned flights. About all we know about space and solar system is from probes and satellites. The science done in the ISS summarizes to toy experiments and work to maintain itself. No surprise there is no immediate plans to replace the ISS, its value is about null from a scientific point of view. And the future of man in space summarize to going to the moon for an honeymoon if you are a billionaire or die during a journey to mars.
And if you absolutely need internet access, you can consult porn sites by smoke signals provided you find a skilled tribe member to send them for you.
AI is not about finding an algorithm to beat the machine, it should be about an algorithm that can learn while playing an improving itself until it can beat the machine. This is AI. Finding and programming an algorithm beating the machine isn't AI, it is real intelligence since the programmer has done all the work until his/her algorithm effectively beat the machine.
Appearance of Forrest Gump is undoubtely a plus.
You just cannot dream doing the same with a manned mission. And sustaining life has an energy cost along the path.
You missed the point. The problem is not gestures themselves, it is the lack of standards. The same gesture doesn't trigger the same kind of action across applications creating confusion in users' minds.
Well, you should distinguish between manned and unmanned space exploration. While unmanned space exploration has proven itself very useful on both scientific and industrial returns on investment, it is a complete other story about manned space exploration. Most of the work done by sending people in space could have been done with unmanned vehicules as well. It is much more costly to send humans in space, we should expect a significant higher return on investment. This is not the case. And to prove that point, space exploration has become a kind of tourism and space agencies are lurking at this market to value the space program. Instead of wasting money and resources in manned space exploration, we should rather than put these resources into unmanned space exploration.
So, my recommendation to this guy would be to buy himself a cheap dumb ASCII terminal and stop whining about wasting pixels on his screen.
find a never ending source of energy to sustain life on the vessel described at point four for at least the number of millenium it will take to head it somewhere across the interstellar space. I should remind everyone the Voyager 1 and 2 probes are now at the very limit of the solar system after a 30 years journey and still emitting a radio signal sending scientific data relying on a Pu238 nuclear energy source which will be at end in about 10 years. At this time, the Voyager 1 and 2 will navigate silently forever the interstellar space at the fastest speed possible using the slingshot effect, but still 40 thousands years away from any other star in this galaxy. So, the question is: How would you sustain life into a vessel travelling interstellar space? Hence, number third and half, which has for corollary if we are to discover any mean of doing this, our energy problem here, on earth, is resolved forever.
So, maybe it should be number 1 in the list.
In conclusion, when Obama approved the operation, he didn't tell anyone OBL should be captured alive if possible or he simply asked specifically he wants him dead? That makes a lot of difference about the White-House rethoric around this operation. There is good reasons to want him dead, but asking him dead is really different from asking to capture him from the presidential point of view. Asking him dead, is denying him any rights to a trial and judging him a priori.
Steganography and pornography are the two breasts of lactating nerds.
The conclusion seems obvious to me, they never try to get him alive, the orders were to kill him.
It may involves steganography, don't you think it is cool enough for nerds?
You are thinking like an occidentalist, don't forget about the rights of spouses and women in general in the Taliban's culture.
Why not just sending probes and f... robots? And, btw, I am asking you the same question I asked to icebraining below: Where do you plan to get the energy to sustain life in the middle of no where without a star at proximity and having exhausted you plutonium 238 reserves?
So, why not just send probes and robots? How do you plan to sustain life, I mean were do you plan to get energy to sustain it while in the middle of nowhere without a star at proximity and having exhausted your plutonium 238 reserves? Let me think, you plan to do a big fire camp with everything that can be burn at hand.
Nope! They were selected because they can talk while the chimps cannot. At that time, submariners, F1 pilots, miners and other peoples acustomed to live in a confined environments were potential candidates. However, since the rocket was expected to fly, the airforce pilots argues the candidates should be selected among them. But, basically, talking was barely enough.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/industrial-robots/humanoid-robot-justin-learning-to-fix-satellites