And I've got daily blowjobs from Kirsten Dunst on the drawing board. Say hi to the Russians, Indians, Europeans and Chinese for me if you ever actually get there. Unless, of course, you're just hitching a ride with them.
You don't and couldn't grow enough cane sugar for your own consumption, even counting the more plentiful sugar beet.
You have to end-of-life old versions at some point. Yes, it's good to support old versions if there's a valid reason to be doing so (Apache 1.3, maybe. Firefox 2.0, no.), but there is a limit.
It's all rather moot with free software anyway. If you really think something should still be maintained, then just do it. (Or pay someone else to.)
Continuing to support old versions is a heavy burden, and has to end at some point. It's not a question of if people will have to make that decision, but when.
Wouldn't standard solutions be cheaper and easier?
on
Using Outlook From Orbit
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Why not just run a normal mailserver with a simple script to deliver any messages in the files uploaded? No need for the astronauts to mess with weird outlook files, just hit "check mail" on whatever client they prefer.
Even though (I think) they no longer take them. I gave them $10 some time in the early naughties, and they still provide what they said they would then. It's hard to complain about that.
Regardless, the price of coal generated power needs to be pegged at a higher rate than the alternatives. "Punishing" the consumers who are "stuck" with coal is the only way to get them to switch to something more responsible.
Nuclear electricity is only more expensive than coal because coal burners are allowed to externalize a great deal of their costs. Bring the cost of coal power up above nuclear through taxation, and this will resolve itself.
He's just as arrogantly claiming that he's right and they're wrong. Now, he may very well in fact be right, but he's taking the same obstinate position the people he criticizes do.
It's important to know when your input is not desired. Even if you think it should be.
Slashdot Mirror
Your funny little missile program hasn't actually managed to shoot anything down on it's own. Which is why you cancelled it.
Did the surge find Bin Laden? I hadn't heard that.
You do know the Ford isn't actually fusion powered, I hope.
Unobtanium is also fiction, just so you know.
And I've got daily blowjobs from Kirsten Dunst on the drawing board. Say hi to the Russians, Indians, Europeans and Chinese for me if you ever actually get there. Unless, of course, you're just hitching a ride with them.
You don't and couldn't grow enough cane sugar for your own consumption, even counting the more plentiful sugar beet.
In fact, all answers really have an implicit "I believe" prepended. Unknown unknowns, and all that.
If you really have to check facebook before the traffic lights, well, it's not facebook's fault.
That'd be one of the proximate things people do pay attention to. If you don't, well, it's not the iPod's fault.
You can also answer "I believe I am not ignoring any" honestly.
Forgotten that you're cancelling your manned space program this year?
I'm not terribly fond of corn fructose. You can keep it.
Have fun running your economy on that, even without the extra demand restarting manufacturing would impose.
Also, manufacturing requires imports other than oil. Remember why you invaded the Philippines? Where do you intend to get rare earth metals?
You need the world. The world doesn't really need you.
If you wilfully ignore them, as the vast majority does.
Do you lot make anything anymore? You don't have any oil.
Have fun with that.
Pianos don't really fall from windows, and it's exceedingly rare for cars to leave the road.
People pay attention to what they need to. Do you notice every homeless person?
You seem to be under the impression that the world in general wants the US to continue. Interesting.
If those factory workers were just a drawing in a computer, sure.
You have to end-of-life old versions at some point. Yes, it's good to support old versions if there's a valid reason to be doing so (Apache 1.3, maybe. Firefox 2.0, no.), but there is a limit.
It's all rather moot with free software anyway. If you really think something should still be maintained, then just do it. (Or pay someone else to.)
Continuing to support old versions is a heavy burden, and has to end at some point. It's not a question of if people will have to make that decision, but when.
Why not just run a normal mailserver with a simple script to deliver any messages in the files uploaded? No need for the astronauts to mess with weird outlook files, just hit "check mail" on whatever client they prefer.
Except 1/8th the size?
Even though (I think) they no longer take them. I gave them $10 some time in the early naughties, and they still provide what they said they would then. It's hard to complain about that.
Regardless, the price of coal generated power needs to be pegged at a higher rate than the alternatives. "Punishing" the consumers who are "stuck" with coal is the only way to get them to switch to something more responsible.
Nuclear electricity is only more expensive than coal because coal burners are allowed to externalize a great deal of their costs. Bring the cost of coal power up above nuclear through taxation, and this will resolve itself.
So they don't need liberating.
They're not rejecting statistics as a field, they're rejecting his claimed expertise in it.
He's just as arrogantly claiming that he's right and they're wrong. Now, he may very well in fact be right, but he's taking the same obstinate position the people he criticizes do.
It's important to know when your input is not desired. Even if you think it should be.
They only need a good plan so long as it effects them. Long term planning from corporations can only ever be an aberration.