There's one painfully obvious truth that so far has seemed to go unnoticed: It's illegal!
The "hacking" antics of these clowns are based on the purported manipulation of copyrighted softwares by some incredibly rich companies with more lawyers than there are posts on this topic...
Why would anyone publicly announce something like this?
How clever of you to have repeat the misspelling of a word you just learned from a passerby
I'm pretty sure (ok, I guess I'm sure) the statement you're referring to was "the average Google user doesn't know what cached webpages are anyway"... While the average user's ability to see and even click a link probably does remain, its their knowledge of exactly what they're doing that was ever even questioned...
I don't think either are delusional, but maybe one of you is a bit dysfunctional... (down boy)
I used to occasionally read through logs of searches for (I believe it was) webcrawler.. and was rather surprised to see how many people searched for sites by their exact address
(Which way did he go, George, which way did he go?)
Re:How come old technology keeps making headlines?
on
P2P in 2001
·
· Score: 1
The reason this type of application is news worthy is because it is the absolute fastest, easiest, and most reliable way for me to access content on the net that I can't find via other channels. These apps make big news because it fell into the laps of every day citizens, and opened u[ a whole new world for them.
Amen... Surprised anybody missed that ?
Slashdot Mirror
The "hacking" antics of these clowns are based on the purported manipulation of copyrighted softwares by some incredibly rich companies with more lawyers than there are posts on this topic...
Why would anyone publicly announce something like this?
Why would the RIAA let him?
Happy NEW year Bowie, and good luck with it .. (btw, does anyone else find it interesting that the original post was marked Funny? hehe..)
"loft story" and loana
Couldn't you just bookmark the query ?
I'm pretty sure (ok, I guess I'm sure) the statement you're referring to was "the average Google user doesn't know what cached webpages are anyway" ... While the average user's ability to see and even click a link probably does remain, its their knowledge of exactly what they're doing that was ever even questioned...
I don't think either are delusional, but maybe one of you is a bit dysfunctional... (down boy)
I'll probably lose a favorite appendage for this .. but for future reference:
robots.cnn.com is a wonderfully quick(er) mirror of the original www...
I used to occasionally read through logs of searches for (I believe it was) webcrawler .. and was rather surprised to see how many people searched for sites by their exact address
(Which way did he go, George, which way did he go?)
The reason this type of application is news worthy is because it is the absolute fastest, easiest, and most reliable way for me to access content on the net that I can't find via other channels. These apps make big news because it fell into the laps of every day citizens, and opened u[ a whole new world for them. Amen... Surprised anybody missed that ?
Speaking as a brand new user to slashdot (wow, my first ever post) .... beats the hell outta me