Slashdot Mirror


Google Recaps 2001

fm6 writes: "Google has suplemented their usual weekly Zeitgeist update with a lovely 2001 Timeline. Particularly interesting to see how the usual queries about celebrities and sports suddenly disappeared in favor of searches about recent event -- although people seem to put Nostradamus in the later category."

155 comments

  1. Interesting story by wsloand · · Score: 3, Funny

    And in other news Slashdot recaps recaps of 2001.

  2. CNN? by Adversive · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Why would you go to Google to look up CNN?
    Doesn't it seem more logical at just type in http://www.cnn.com ?

    Oh yeah. People are stupid.

    --
    Adversive
    My cat's breath smells like cat food.
    1. Re:CNN? by -=Izzy=- · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People most likely went to google looking for cached versions of the news reports. remember, cnn (and most other news sites) were swamped.

    2. Re:CNN? by mccalli · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why would you go to Google to look up CNN?

      Perhaps it records 'and' searches too? As in, "cnn impartial wonder source" and "cnn utterly biased coverage" both contribute to the tally for CNN?

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they were looking for other websites related to CNN, or just news in general. Since the September 11th attacks most people have been desperate for news from any source, and a google search for CNN might yield some nice diverse results than just typing in 'http://www.cnn.com '

    4. Re:CNN? by Samuel+Hughes · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Most people probably went looking for cached versions of the page.

      Of course, that doesn't explain the searches for Amazon, topping the top ten retailers list.

    5. Re:CNN? by Adversive · · Score: 5, Funny
      True. I didn't think about that. But I also think the average Google user doesn't know what cached webpages are anyway.

      In fact, on Sept 11 a co-worker took a screenshot of an MSN Search of "www.cnn.com" which returned no hits.
      And immediately underneath is asked if you wanted to visit similar sites, such as http://www.cnn.com.

      --
      Adversive
      My cat's breath smells like cat food.
    6. Re:CNN? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've noticed an odd proliferation of people who seem to associate google with "using the net". i.e. I walked up to the desk of a peer computer professional and told him about a great computer hardware site, to which he pops up google and punches in the URL, following the "uh...do you just want the website?" first link. The only reason he did this was that it's become a habit to him (meaning lots of extra ad impressions for Google).

    7. Re:CNN? by jmz · · Score: 0, Informative

      I've seen plenty of people who don't know how to use the address bar, or type in the url themselves :)

    8. Re:CNN? by qweqwe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's also another reason. The google query:
      slashdot site:cnn.com
      gives you different information than a simple CNN search for "slashdot". It tells you the most popular (i.e. most linked to) articles on CNN that refer to slashdot. Often times, this is more important since, as far as the world is concerned, these are the most memorable Slashdot articles.

    9. Re:CNN? by Big+Dogs+Cock · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe, but there are a lot of genuinely stupid people out there. I've seen people use search engines to find the websites of firms including IBM, Microsoft and all sorts.

      --
      "Under the iron bridge, we fist" - The Smiths, Still Ill
    10. Re:CNN? by LOTR+Troll · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Oh, the average google user is clearly too stupid to click the google cache link right next to the entry. Man are you diluded.

      --

    11. Re:CNN? by mike.richards · · Score: 1

      I used to occasionally read through logs of searches for (I believe it was) webcrawler .. and was rather surprised to see how many people searched for sites by their exact address (Which way did he go, George, which way did he go?)

    12. Re:CNN? by mike.richards · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll probably lose a favorite appendage for this .. but for future reference:
      robots.cnn.com is a wonderfully quick(er) mirror of the original www...

    13. Re:CNN? by mike.richards · · Score: 1
      How clever of you to have repeat the misspelling of a word you just learned from a passerby

      I'm pretty sure (ok, I guess I'm sure) the statement you're referring to was "the average Google user doesn't know what cached webpages are anyway" ... While the average user's ability to see and even click a link probably does remain, its their knowledge of exactly what they're doing that was ever even questioned...

      I don't think either are delusional, but maybe one of you is a bit dysfunctional... (down boy)

    14. Re:CNN? by nob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although it probably only makes up a small percentage of the searches, I know theres a lot of people (mostly webmasters) that will search for CNN over and over to see when the Google index updated. This is because the date is on CNN's page, so you can check the cache to see when the robot grabbed it. Of course, now Google is grabbing the more popular sites daily, so this doesn't work anymore.

      --
      daed si luap
    15. Re:CNN? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Well, compare this with what you find when you search for Slashdot on Amazon (that would be nothing).

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    16. Re:CNN? by KurdtX · · Score: 2

      I noticed that too, then again, almost all the news sites that have names the same as their titles are searched for. What I think is more funny is how many other sites that couldn't have been explained by people looking for cached versions of the site there are: nokia, sony, bmw... and Amazon for *'s sake! I guess it's good that people are using Google, but how stupid are they, really? And I didn't think bookmarks/shorcuts where that advanced of a concept.

      --

      Kurdt
      I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    17. Re:CNN? by joshjs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On 9/11, right after the attacks, cnn.com was virtually unreachable. Some people probably didn't understand why.

    18. Re:CNN? by ChadN · · Score: 1

      I often look up websites through Google because it lists the main site and often the most relevant sublink (ie. downloads, etc.) Also, I find it is QUICKER than just typing (for example) cnn.com into the URL bar and waiting for the browser to do a "smart search", or whatever other dumb feature is enabled on the various browsers I might have to use.

      In short, Google is awesome.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    19. Re:CNN? by LOTR+Troll · · Score: 0

      Easy there, you'll have your own share of my cornhole in due time.

      --

    20. Re:CNN? by boopus · · Score: 1

      This isn't actualy that odd, considering the minor variations in a URL. I often use this technique when I'm going to a web page that I'm not too familiar with. Plenty of sites use .orgs or .nets that you'd never guess the first try, so it's usualy easier to just type it in the name and hit the I'm feeling lucky link. One click, no add impressions at all.

    21. Re:CNN? by Arlet · · Score: 2

      I just checked my web server logs from the last couple of weeks. Out of 252 request that came from a google search, only 3 came from the google cache (getting the images for the cached pages), and all three were from the same host. I'll admit that this is in no way representative, but it would appear that the most people don't use the cache feature. Since nearly all of my pages have in-line images, which google doesn't cache, I don't think there is a significant number of google cache requests that I didn't see here.

    22. Re:CNN? by MrWa · · Score: 1
      A better, and more likely, explanation is that people have Google set as their home page - that is the first thing I do when I get a new browser.

      It is a lot easier to type "cnn", hit enter, and click on the first link than it is to type "cnn.com" in the URL bar - I save four key strokes (though who is counting.)

      The caching on newsite pages didn't occur until later in the day.

    23. Re:CNN? by filtersweep · · Score: 1

      Just for giggles I did a search for the variations of CNN and came up with:

      "Read the Latest News
      See the day's top stories at MSNBC." (listed as an *actual* search result?- I will give them some credit- it came in #2 rather than #1)

      huh... those geniuses must have figured out that I was REALLY wanting to visit msnbc.com! Absolutely brilliant!

      --


      Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
    24. Re:CNN? by F452 · · Score: 1

      I only use the cached version if the "real" version is unavailable, which I'm guessing is what most people do. If the original pages are available that probably explains the lack of cache hits.

    25. Re:CNN? by F452 · · Score: 1

      This is just silly. You have to move your hand from the keyboard to work the mouse for your method. That hardly seems more efficient!

  3. Nostradamus by sinserve · · Score: 5, Funny

    How unamerican,

    Back in the day, when I was naturalized as a US
    citizen, people had an objective look towards life.

    But after years of CNN, reality TV and Sports entertainment shows;
    i guess they are starting to develop a sixth sense for bullshit.

    Voodoo will determine the outcome of the next election results,
    and maybe, maybe the IRS will take coconut for tax-payment.

    1. Re:Nostradamus by well_jung · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's worse is that Brittany Spears was one of the most looked up people. And I thought only cool people used Google...

      --
      Carl G. Jung
      --
      "With one breath, with one flow, You will know Synchronicity" -La Policia
  4. Top Combination by denzo · · Score: 4, Funny
    If the "people" are to be trusted, than perhaps a combination of their top picks may mean great commercial success.

    Consider a Harry Potter movie that starred Britney Spears and Nostradamus (hmm, he's dead, we'll have to go with the next choice, Osama Bin Laden as the male lead), with the two remaining Beatles composing the music (which will be simultaneously released on Morpheus), utilizing Windows XP as the OS for the animation effects with the CounterStrike rendering engine. Nokia and Amazon will be major sponsors, with their logos splashed on all attire and walls. CNN will be the primary media outlet for press releases regarding this movie, with tennis star Anna Kournikova doing the reporting.

    If any producers are interested in doing this, give me a call. It'll be just fab, baby!

    1. Re:Top Combination by agentZ · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just because somebody is dead doesn't mean they can't put him in a major motion picture.

    2. Re:Top Combination by denzo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Just because somebody is dead doesn't mean they can't put him in a major motion picture.
      Unfortunately, all prior footage and photo stills of Nostradamus in our archive vault has deteriorated too much to be useful for digital recreation.

      At least if Osama dies before the movie is made, he's given us plenty of footage to go on! And we still have five more live people left on the Top 10 list, so not to worry!

    3. Re:Top Combination by dolo666 · · Score: 1
      ...CounterStrike rendering engine


      Not to be a big prude but CounterStrike doesn't have it's own rendering engine. Contrary to popular belief, CS is not a game, but a modification to Half Life that happens to be more popular than most games -- including Half Life.

    4. Re:Top Combination by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      So put someone in the movie who you claim is Nostradamus.; It ain't like any of us know what the hell he looks like anyway..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:Top Combination by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Its a movie - its Osama Bin Laden playing Nostradamus, of course.

    6. Re:Top Combination by denzo · · Score: 2
      Perhaps this movie venture was doomed to fail, anyway. Upon further consideration, it looks like our researchers have run into the crux of the problem with our male lead role. They carefully analysed the name of Nostradamus to reveal that is sounds like:

      "No stars, damn us."

      Thank you for your interest in this venture. We hope to offer other options for "popularity" movies. In the meantime, have a happy new year.

      -- Faux Director of "Oops, I'm Harry Potter Again XP in Amazon/Nikon Studio for Release by CNN with Anna Kournikova".

      (maybe we should have gone with a shorter title, anyway)

    7. Re:Top Combination by spudnic · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's too tall.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    8. Re:Top Combination by Home�rew · · Score: 1

      "life is a state of mind" - bejamin rand

      --
      Pablo Piccaso was never called an asshole. Not like you.
  5. Google and online language shift by madmagic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Top Holiday Searches 2001:
    1. christmas
    2. navidad
    3. hanukkah
    4. weihnachtskarten
    5. adventskalender


    Interesting to see that only one of the above five words -- or perhaps two of five, depending on your opinions of hanukkah :) -- is a traditional English language word.

    It's beginning to look a lot more like an international net. Will Cantonese words top the list by '05? '10?

    -Patrick

    1. Re:Google and online language shift by JanneM · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's even more interesting that a Swedish word manages to get the fifth spot; Half the population must have been searching for it to get this high...

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Google and online language shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      interesting, but too bad it doesnt show the number of searches, instead of a ranking
      there's no way to tell if christmas got 85% of the searches, or 25%

    3. Re:Google and online language shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      'adventskalender' (fifth spot) is a word in Germany.

    4. Re:Google and online language shift by timefactor · · Score: 2

      'Adventskalender' is also German, Danish, and Norwegian. The first 11 pages returned by Google are in German.

    5. Re:Google and online language shift by einer · · Score: 1

      I like how a television show I've never heard of -- 'Loft Story' -- was the number 1 search in its category... Apparently it's a French version of 'Big Brother.' Or, I suppose, 'Big Brother' is the American version of 'Loft Story'...

    6. Re:Google and online language shift by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      It's also Dutch.

    7. Re:Google and online language shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the second one, navidad, its spanish, we managed to get second!! Spanish its the third most spoken language (first chinese, second english) in the world, but on the net it isnt that popular (there are even more webpages in french and italian than in spanish).

      So, come on people, write in spanish!!

      Hasta luego chavalotes!

    8. Re:Google and online language shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Will Cantonese words top the list by '05? '10?

      Only if Google's East Asian langauge support improves. In my limited experience, Asian-only search engines perform better than Google.

    9. Re:Google and online language shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In China, Mandarin is much more common than Cantonese, which is primarily spoken in Hong Kong.

      So you should be asking if Mandarin will be in the top spot in five years, not Cantonese.

  6. Seattle Earthquake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone needs to remind their graph-maker how many days there are in February...

  7. Big Brother by dolo666 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Google timeline... Hey I guess they really do pay attention to the search querries at these engines. Now that they know what we're thinking, will they be forced to act on piracy searches? I wonder if they send the ips out to the government of people looking for stuff they shouldn't be.

    I have a site that gets a lot of traffic from Google because of articles and such, but even writing about warez gets me hits from people looking to get pirated software. What are the ethics here? Does Google or any search engine have to publish the IPs to the government of people looking for stuff they shouldn't be?

    Side note.. I can actually remember searching for a desktop image on Google that they have in this Zeitgeist. Creepy.

    1. Re:Big Brother by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 1

      At this point, "looking" for warez is not illegal; using them is, just like looking for information on narcotics is illegal.

    2. Re:Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah I'm sure the government is very intrested to know that 56.77.123.57 made a search for "Tetris warez".

      What do you think dumbass? How many times have you heard of the feds busting a individual for using warez'ed Windows? They don't give a damn if serious money is not involved.

    3. Re:Big Brother by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Does Google or any search engine have to publish the IPs to the government of people looking for stuff they shouldn't be?

      You do realize that if this happened to be true, the search engine would have to submit thousands -- maybe even millions -- of IP addresses per day, don't you? A task like this is far too much work to be worth it. This is what Carnivore is for.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  8. Windows XP popularity by qweqwe · · Score: 5, Funny

    This part of the "Top 20 Gaining Queries" caught my eye:
    5. anthrax
    6. windows xp
    7. osama bin laden

    So Windows XP is more popular than osama bin laden but not nearly as popular as anthrax.

    Wait 'til the Microsoft Marketing Department gets a hold of this.;-)

    1. Re:Windows XP popularity by "Zow" · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wait 'til the Microsoft Marketing Department gets a hold of this.

      Anthrax or Osama bin Laden? I think it's a safe bet they already have Windows XP.

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

  9. Tragedies by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it sad to see how much tragedies shape our lives. Putting September 11 aside for a moment, the Intimidator was the most often searched for object/person in one month. It was a horrible terrible thing to have happened and it seems everyone became fascinated with it to an extent and began searching google for it.

    Add to that September 11th. People again began searching for something that was gone only after it had been destroyed.

    Why can't we as Americans.... as people, appreciated the wonderful things we have before they're gone?

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Tragedies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be right but it's hard to conclude from Google's top query list, because while people may appreciate the World Trade Center (I certainly did when I last visited it), they do over a spread out period of time, while the tragedy gets searched for all at once, so it shows up as a bigger blip on the radar.

    2. Re:Tragedies by _ECC_ · · Score: 1

      It's just that tragedy tends to focus everyone's attention. Most of the time people are using google to search for their varied interests. I think it'd be a greater tragedy if noone had searched for "the Intimidator" when he died. Atleast this shows that they care.

      --
      ecc

    3. Re:Tragedies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm just agreeing with the other member who responded.. but:
      - I'd hope that an attack on the US / WTC buildings would provoke an interest in discovering the surrounding facts of the incident
      - I'd also hope that, just like you said, people can enjoy some of the wonderful things we already have .. but something tells me you're not going to find a surge on 9/11 8:30am of people looking for information on art or history

  10. What I'd like to see... by eaddict · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is a list of everything I searched for all year. It would be neat to for google to allow you to sign-in and record what you are looking for. You need not sign-in if you are looking for something that you don't want recorded.

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
    1. Re:What I'd like to see... by rednuhter · · Score: 1

      sounds cool but I doubt they would impliment such a data heavy feature, but why not write your own and only search google via your gateway ?

      --
      ERR 411[Max number of witty sigs reached]
    2. Re:What I'd like to see... by mike.richards · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you just bookmark the query ?

  11. What about other Search Engines? by DocStoner · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda curious about the other search engines. I don't really think they would be too different because I also believe most people aren't aware of the cache option on google. I know I really didn't notice it till I became a slashdot regular. (BTW, thanks to all who do point out these goodies to us)

    1. Re:What about other Search Engines? by sconest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking of other search engines, I wonder how they still are in business with Google's current position.

      I don't many more search engines that offer what Google offers e.g. :

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
  12. Top 10 Sports Queries by Quizme2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. anna kournikova

    I wonder how many were in the new image search engine
    --
    "Get them before they get....
    1. Re:Top 10 Sports Queries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Top 10 Sports Queries by withak · · Score: 1

      They have her listed as #1 under the "sports" catagory. I don't think most of those people were looking for any sports information.

    3. Re:Top 10 Sports Queries by zonker · · Score: 0

      i think the search they are looking for is more likely to be this one...

  13. Loft Story by ^BR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interesting that Loft Story is the more popular TV request. For those who don't know Loft Story was the French version of Big Brother, with only a few variation.

    The funny thing is that we actually got a couple fucking (there was a hottie stripper among the candidate, she eventually won, search for Loana), and if it was not shown on TV, the whole thing eventually leaked as MPEGs on the Internet (filmed in infrared :-)), so all those Loft Story request where really people looking for pr0n...

    1. Re:Loft Story by mike.richards · · Score: 2, Interesting
      january 2002's number one gaining query:
      "loft story" and loana

      ;)

  14. Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 4, Offtopic



    This year has been one of the worst years I can remember in my entire life. Good riddance, this year sucked a big one and kept on sucking. Lets have a look at my timeline:

    January: I go into debt.

    February: Work stress piles up, I go further into debt.

    March: The dickhead who was managing PROPAGANDA's SQL database decides to "upgrade" the box and torches damn near a thousand articles. I rebuild from scratch in my spare time with the help of some friends.

    April: A girl gets butchered and raped in the apartment across the walkway from me. I stay until 10:30 or so to see what the news crews have learned, and decide to stay the night over at Ginger's place because I'm too creeped out about the whole thing. I give a taped statement to the police about what I may have heard or seen the night before. I leave, and just as I head out, I see them bringing the body bag out, and see the outline of the girl's head in the bag and damn near throw up. I spend the next week or so living with Ginger until I can get a chance to arrange to move to a new complex.

    May: I move to a new, secure, gated apartment complex. The apartment manager at my old apartment complex refuses to break anyone's lease, and refuses let anyone out. He also refuses to allow anyone to pay off the remainder of their lease. I'm screwed for $3000, and spend the next 6 months paying off two apartments. Hired a lawyer in preparation to sue my former apartment complex to get out of the lease. It doesn't work. I talk to a news crew and light a fire under their ass, that still doesnt work. Ultimately, i'm screwed for three grand, and now carry $1100 a month in rent expenses. Thank god I work at IBM.

    June: I find out my new neighbor at the new apartment complex wears a monitoring bracelet around his ankle. Wonderful. He also wears a two foot long tattoo across his midsection. This kid is 19 years old. Work stress continues as rumors circulate through IBM that contractors are about to get the axe..Myself included.

    July: Laid off. IBM cuts 40% of their workforce here in town. Everyone I know is out of work. The economy tanks hard as the dot-com loser bubble bursts. My convicted-felon neighbor has a screaming argument outside on his balcony. His girlfriend jumps off the third story balcony and ends up being carried out on a stretcher. The police take another statement from me about what I might have heard or seen. They chuckle at my bad luck after I tell them where I lived a few months ago. I figure a piano is going to fall through the ceiling and kill me one of these days.
    August: Mad rush to take shelter in classes at the local college to wait out the storm. Just barely get onboard in time. Word trickles out of IBM that nobody expects to be re-hired until early 2002. Great. Now I have to ask my parents for financial help, and will continue to rely on them for the next 4 months.

    September: Mr. Roger's retires, the world explodes, and Ginger calls me up at 7 in the morning and tells me the World Trade Center is on fire. I watch as another plane hits, and what we thought at the time to be 30 to 40,000 people fall to their deaths on fire and pulverized by concrete. The entire country goes to hell in a handbasket. I can count the number of UNIX-related job openings on one hand. I prepare Ginger for the idea that I may have to move to Colorado to find work. Theres one company up there still hiring.

    October: My car dies...A broken crank shaft that would cost more to repair than the entire vehicle was worth. Now I need to get a new car while paying off two apartments. Thankfully, this is the last month I'll have to pay rent in two different places. The new car costs $5K, and automatically dumps my head in the debt bucket and holds it under the water for the next few months. I start making the rounds of people I may have unjustly skewered over the past year or two with little success.. Whatever jobs were open have all now dried up as the industry tightens its belt and locks the door for the long run. Anthrax, anthrax, anthrax, anthrax, anthrax.

    November: A glimmer of hope. I run into a former coworker at a car wash, and beg her to bring word back that I've been holding out for months waiting to get back on the boat at IBM. More debt, more stress. Thank god I've got Ginger.

    December: Cant go home for Christmas and be with my family because of Osama. Parents don't want me on a plane. Things start to settle down, i'm getting used to the idea of being unemployed. Just as I do, I get a call from a contractor firm that Big Blue as opened its doors. I do backflips and cartwheels and have my name on the dotted line within 45 minutes. The light at the end of the tunnel appears and Dick Clark looks like he's aged alot in the past year.

    Good fucking riddance, 2001. I hope I forget you quickly.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you knew about Ginger before everyone else did...

    2. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      Bowie, wow.. im glad im not the only one who has a 2001 horror story.. So much has gone wrong this year both in the world and my personal life.. I too got let go this year, I fell head over feet into debt, lost my roommate, most of my family has fallen ill, had several personal revelations of a most unsettling nature, had to take a job for $6K less than what i was making before, stay miserable, and unfortunately, there still is no end in sight. UNIX jobs in Nashville? There aren't any. My company has me bent over a barrel and they know it.

    3. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      My sympathies, Bowie. Sounds like you've had it pretty rough.

      But as for mine, I really can't complain: I started out the year homeless, jobless, car-less, broke, and sick at heart. After a spell of doing temp work, I actually found a Webdev job where I made a decent salary and got to improve my skills as well. Got laid off from said job 6 months later, but that's proved to be a blessing in disguise, as I'd managed to get myself published twice during the interim and now I'm actually in demand as a freelance developer, consultant, reviewer, and writer. My former employer even continues to provide me with free office space -- complete with a decent workstation, high bandwidth, and even a few referrals to potential clients -- because he feels it's to his advantage to have me associated with his business, so even though he can't actually pay me anything, it's a pretty good deal. I have a decent apartment now. I have a used car that's still quite serviceable and is 2/3 paid off. I've gone through a divorce and emerged as something resembling a halfway-balanced individual again (my ex was and remains a certifiable nutjob). I've met a gal IRL from halfway round the planet with whom I'd been corresponding for about a year, and not only is she not a psycho, she's actually saner and more stable than I am, the meeting's gone well, and she's even agreed to stay with me here in the States for the next couple months -- and she's turning out to be a valuable asset in my consulting business as well.

      All-in-all, '01 has been a pretty damned good year for me and I have a lot to be grateful for. And I am.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      life is tough. get hard.

    5. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by NerdSlayer · · Score: 0, Troll

      You sound a little meek. You need to take the bull by the horns and stop letting your shitty attitude get in the way of your life

      April: A girl gets butchered and raped in the apartment across the walkway from me.I leave, and just as I head out, I see them bringing the body bag out, and see the outline of the girl's head in the bag and damn near throw up. I spend the next week or so living with Ginger until I can get a chance to arrange to move to a new complex.

      Obviously this is a sad story, but when I was in high school I was in a car accident and woke up to my best friends head split open. That wasn't pleasant either, but did I never ride in a car again? Of course not.

      If this was a one time incident, that sucks. But it is really necessary to move? Crimes happen everyday everywhere. If you really did live in that bad of an apartment complex, then you had a case to move.

      The apartment manager at my old apartment complex refuses to break anyone's lease, and refuses let anyone out. He also refuses to allow anyone to pay off the remainder of their lease. I'm screwed for $3000, and spend the next 6 months paying off two apartments

      Did you ever try to sublet? It seems like your legal fees would have been well spent taking out some ads in the local paper.

      I find out my new neighbor at the new apartment complex wears a monitoring bracelet around his ankle. Wonderful.

      So what? If he was a 3rd time offending axe murderer, he wouldn't be under house arrest, he be in a maximum security prison. Maybe he was a non-voilet marijuana offender? Why do you just jump to conclusions here? Can't people make mistakes?

      Cant go home for Christmas and be with my family because of Osama. Parents don't want me on a plane.

      Are you 17? How can your parents still dictate everything you do? Are you not an adult?

      Frankly, I could go on and on, but I won't. The point of my post is not insult you or make fun of you, but to point out that your life isn't that bad. Perhaps some of these problems are even your own fault. Why didn't you get a temporary job when you were laid off? Bartending for 15 bucks an hour will keep a roof over your head and food on your table.

      You need to learn from your mistakes and take some direct accountability for your own fate instead of being a hapless bystander.

    6. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by dimator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank god I've got Ginger.

      When the only thing good in your life is a two-wheeled scooter, you know you're miserable.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    7. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2

      (Yeesh, to whoever modded this guy don't to a Troll....He doesn't deserve it, he raises some valid questions/points.)

      "Obviously this is a sad story, but when I was in high school I was in a car accident and woke up to my best friends head split open. That wasn't pleasant either, but did I never ride in a car again? Of course not. "

      I should have also mentioned I have an enormous taboo against Death. When this happened, I realized it could have been a totally arbitrary choice on behalf of the murderer who's stairwell he ran up. Could have been mine. Since I was working at IBM at the time, I figured I had enough financial security to get the hell out and move somewhere else. My bed also faces the crime scene. I cant exactly sleep in my own bed or look out my living room window without seeing the place where a 19 year old girl got butchered. I had way too much going on at that point in my life to get saddled with that sort of brainweight, so I bailed. And it was a bad complex -- One of my friends wouldnt come over unless he brought his gun to protect his car incase someone tried to break into it. Relax, he's responsible with it.

      "Did you ever try to sublet? It seems like your legal fees would have been well spent taking out some ads in the local paper."

      I couldn't in good conscience sublet my apartment to a friend without telling them what happened there, or without telling them how unsafe it was. That place had gone downhill in a hurry in the past year. The people cross the way smoked pot in front of their kids, and oh, by the way, the guy who butchered the chick lived across the way, too, next door to the victim. Nice neighborhood, eh?

      "Are you 17? How can your parents still dictate everything you do? Are you not an adult?"

      Of course I am, but my mom & dad are 62 and 68 years old, respectively. They tend to get a little overanxious about what they watch on the news, and i'd be giving them a heart attack by getting on a plane around a Christian holiday. Plus, there was no guarantee back then that air travel would be safe. I'm considerate of my folks, thats all.

      "You need to learn from your mistakes and take some direct accountability for your own fate instead of being a hapless bystander."

      I agree with you. But you can only jump out of the frying pan and into the fire when you can find a way not to get burned.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    8. Re:Goodbye 2001? Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gee Bowie, sounds like all those pissy statements you made about everyone came back to you in spades -- karmic payback is a bitch isnt it King Tubby?


      Never have I seen someone as able to delegate blame and spew vapid baseless commentary/indictments as you (with the possible exceptions of RMS and Sharpton)


      May you gain some mass above your brainstem in 2k2.

  15. What you WOULDN'T like to see... by Tsar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is a list of everything you searched for all year, available to anyone (spouse, employer, neighbors...). So you'd have to make sure that Google kept your information absolutely secure. Good thing Internet sites have such a stellar reputation for that.

    "In other news, Joe Blow of 327 Maple Street was charged with last year's rape and murder of Jane Doe of Alta Vista. Officials said that the big break in the case came when a subpoena of Google search records for area residents turned up evidence that the terms "rape", "weapons", and "attack" had been used in searches from Blow's home computer. Mr. Blow is being held without bond while police search for additional damning evidence against this psychopathic killer..."

    "Update: Jailed rapist and killer Joe Blow appears to have escaped conviction for his 2000 rape and murder of Alta Vista resident Jane Doe, as after three months of searching, officials have failed to uncover additional evidence from his well-covered trail. The DA's office has sworn that this vicious criminal will not go unpunished, however, since they'e sure they can find something in his Google search records that will indicate some felony involvement in something or other."

    1. Re:What you WOULDN'T like to see... by ymgve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting thing is, that here in Norway, some of the 'evidence' in a poison murder case was that his web history (Gathered from his OWN computer, thankfully) showed up searches for 'murder', 'Thallium' (a strong poison), 'identify', 'traceability' and 'tissue'.

      The article can be found here (Norwegian only)

  16. Hrumph. by LOTR+Troll · · Score: 1, Funny

    I saw LOTR on the gigantic IMAX screen at the Montreal Famous Player's theatre. Wasn't "Holy Fucking Shit" good (as exclaimed by some /. lusers), but decent. Anyhow, if you're posting here during the New Year's countdown, I pity you.

    --

  17. Top Retailers... by thilmony · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How many people know how to type www.google.com into their browser, but then have to search to find amazon.com and never even think to type www.amazon.com?

    dumbshits I guess?

    --
    YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
    1. Re:Top Retailers... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Actually many offices have their employees home pages to either google or yahoo. I have mine goto yahoo, considering google, but they would probably freak. I know most of them panic, when yahoo is down, and they don't bother trying any other sites, or don't know how to, I'm not quite sure I want to know.

  18. same situation with yahoo by jiminim · · Score: 1, Informative

    Set yahoo.com as someones homepage and they think that the only way to get anywhere is the search bar.

  19. Re:Interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a lead filled snow shoe!

  20. Arg! No preview. by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 2, Informative

    That last bit should have been "...looking for information on narcotics is _not_ illegal

    1. Re:Arg! No preview. by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      So I'll be ok if i search google for 'local drug dealers contact info price lists' ?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Arg! No preview. by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but that alone would not be sufficient for probable cause. If you were arrested, that information could possibly be used for determining intent, perhaps, but you generally still have to have committed the crime in order to be arrested.

  21. election results and voodoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you forgot, voodoo determined the LAST presidental outcome!

  22. Cinco de Mayo by xee · · Score: 1

    Yes, the 5th of may, but what the hell is "Cindo de Mayo"???

    --
    Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
    1. Re:Cinco de Mayo by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      The day Mexicans celebrate kicking Napoleon III's ass out of their country.

      Y'know, all you had to do was click the link...

    2. Re:Cinco de Mayo by xee · · Score: 1

      Duh! In the graphic the caption on the Cinco De Mayo bar was labeled "Cindo De Mayo" not "Cinco De Mayo". Cindo!!! oh well. never mind.

      --
      Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
    3. Re:Cinco de Mayo by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      doh! My eye skipped right over the 'd' both times. Apologies.

  23. What I'd like in Google ;) by sconest · · Score: 1

    A killer feature would be to be able to upload a sample of you hummin or singing a song and have Google make a search for the title of that song :)

    --
    Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    1. Re:What I'd like in Google ;) by sconest · · Score: 1

      On a further note, it seems someone is already working on something similar.

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
  24. Strange search hits by invenustus · · Score: 2

    I think every web site owner who reads their logs faithfully can relate a story of users' being referred to the site through a Google search on something completely unrelated. I remember a while back when an entry I had on Diaryland which said something like "Then my drunk girlfriend and her three drunk apartmentmates stopped by" reached Google, I started getting hits literally DAILY referred by a search on "drunk girls."

    Diarylanders find the phenomenon so amusing that there's now a site dedicated to it: OddGoogle.

    --
    grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    1. Re:Strange search hits by marnanel · · Score: 2

      Nice. There's also the rather similar Disturbing Search Requests. There are some odd people out there.

      --
      GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  25. Women by rasactive · · Score: 1

    Why is Britney Spears most searched for?

    Real men look at REAL porn.

  26. What everybody was really looking for... by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

    Pr0n. It would have spanned the entire timeline and really put everything in perspective. Instead, i'll do it.

    Number 1 search on new years day. Pr0n. Valentines day. Pr0n. Mothers day. Pr0n. Fathers day. Pr0n. Fourth of July. Pr0n. All summer. Pr0n. Haloween. Pr0n. Thanksgiving. Pr0n. Every holiday. Pr0n. That's only the important dates too!

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  27. Searches in July by KC+Swan · · Score: 1, Funny

    With all those July searches for Chandra Levy, don't you think SOMEBODY would have found her?

  28. Re:pathetic by mike.richards · · Score: 1
    The ability to shut up and read on is amazingly simple

    Happy NEW year Bowie, and good luck with it .. (btw, does anyone else find it interesting that the original post was marked Funny? hehe..)

  29. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did this get rejected for me a couple of weeks ago:
    * 2001-12-20 22:49:07 Year-End Google Zeitgeist (articles,internet) (rejected)

    but now they are posting it? It also took them 5 days to reject the story.

    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hey.. pssst... it's December 31. Maybe the /. editors noticed the google zeitgeist article a longish time ago, and were holding off on posting it until new years eve. You notice there's a lot of year-end-retrospective-related articles today? Yeah, well maybe they've been planning that.

      Note you don't know when fm6 submitted their blurb-- it could have been on the ninteenth. You also don't know how many people besides you and fm6 submitted that story. Maybe LOTS of people submited the google zeitgeist thing, and they just liked fm6's comment.

      I think about 90% of the problems with slashdot have to do with idiots who think things are some kind of race-- you have to be the first one to post a comment that seems insightful at a glance so you show up on the first pageload and people 'notice' you, and so you pick up on the early wash of moderators who just look at anything that looks remotely good (including comments that are just quotes pasted from the article), even if doing so means you don't read the extant comments.. You have to find stuff and submit it before anybody else and if slashdot doesn't immediately post this new great thing, then you somehow got gypped becuase you won the race and it was your right. Right?

      Just go away. Go to kuro5hin. It will be be better for all of us; you can get instant recognition for submitting something early, and other people won't have to read your crud becuase k5 deletes trolls.

      Blah.

  30. Anybody else find it ironic? by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Funny

    The number 1 man sought for on the Internet was Nostradamus (an alchemist with a reputation of being a prophet, though his predictions are so obscure that hindsight even doesn't help), and the second most sought man on the internet was Osama bin Ladin.

    With all those people searching for Osama bin Ladin, do you think we will find him> ;)

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Anybody else find it ironic? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Silly, you can not find Osama by searching on Google (or anywhere else), you have to bomb Afghanistan for that.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  31. The URL Elite by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Oh yeah. People are stupid.
    Ignorance of URL synatx == stupidity? Perhaps you think the world would be a better place if it were ruled by people who'd won the Obfuscated C contest. Scary thought that.
  32. The Year From Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here. Layoffs, lawsuits, old people's scary and potentially deadly diseases striking our young workforce, friends and relatives dying, more layoffs, more lawsuits, insurance companies not coming across, key developers leaving, parents suddenly showing old age, divorces, more deaths, creditors on every side; not to mention national tragedy & being a citizen of a country that doesn't know when to quit bombing... heck one of us even got snakebit & nearly lost a leg. 2001, you weren't what you were supposed to be. Some details slightly changed to mislead the bad luck demons because there are still 11.5 hours left in this doomladen year and I for one want to spend them under the bed.

  33. Chandra by xant · · Score: 1

    With all that searching America did for Chandra Levy, it's amazing that nobody found her. Doesn't reflect well on the quality of Google as a search engine.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  34. You have to give it to google. by tcc · · Score: 2

    What I love about them is they gained popularity, the service held like it was before, and heck, look at the start page, do you see load of useless stuff? do you see loads of banner adds, buttons, "options that you never go thru", images, etc? no. They kept it clean, simple, fast to load, and they've managed even to make it cute (noticed how many times the google logo changed since 2 weeks)

    I just hope it will stay that way because THAT'S the way it should be for people like us that wants to get something fast and to the point without having to code an SQL query form in the input search :)

    Kudos to Google.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  35. Mmm AC-130 by krangomatik · · Score: 1

    I'm suprised to see the AC-130 in the Top Searches related to the war on terrorism. Its not the most common aircraft and it seems like many people haven't heard of them. It kinda suprised me that they haven't been using any A-10s in the war. I guess that range to target would have cut down a bit on their loiter time since we didn't exactly have any close airfields. Hrmmm...maybe they could make an AC-130 with a GAU-8/A Avenger cannon...heheheh...what impractical fun that could be! :)

    1. Re:Mmm AC-130 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't A10 anti-armour?

      Do you think the Taliban uses lots of tanks?

    2. Re:Mmm AC-130 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti armour, yes. Anti other stuff, yes too. IIRC T-50's(actually upgraded T-50s) are not uncommon among the various fighting forces in Afghanistan, including the Taliban. I believe that they may also have had a small number of T-72s. The A-10 is also an effective weapon against columns of just about any type vehicles. Its GAU-8/A Avenger cannon can tear up just about anything and the A-10 also has something like 8 wing and 3 fuselage hardpoints that can be used for dumb and cluster bombs, mavericks, and rocket pods. Given a close enough airfield it could have probably done a good job providing the close air support for the anti-taliban fighters. It can carry enough ordinance to take out quite a bit of hardware as well as make a few strafing runs with its 30mm cannon. It would have scared the shit out of me if I was a Taliban dude and saw a few A-10's show up while I was heading down the road. Plus they could probably survive a stinger missile hit as well or better than anything else we have, but they're also one of the most likely to get tagged by one.

  36. Re:pathetic by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    Yah, really. :) At first I was sort of insulted that someone thought my miserable year was "funny", but, I did too. More than once this year, I remember looking at my situation and just laughing hysterically at how miserably bad everything had turned so quickly. So bad its comical.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  37. No way by _ganja_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, I think this is just made up and not based on seaches at all. I think we all know that if this was based on search engine queries it would look something like this:

    January to December: porn & warez.

    Yet neither school girl wet slut lesbians or crack whore dick suckers gets a look in for the whole year.

    --

    A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

    1. Re:No way by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      You'll notice that no section of the Zeitgeist actually describes which things were searched for the most overall - only the top gaining and declining, and the top in each section. That's probably why.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    2. Re:No way by _ganja_ · · Score: 2

      Or maybe they just don't count my searches :-)

      --

      A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

  38. Google NOT the most Popular Search engine by vikool · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Google NOT the most Popular Search engine by Figz · · Score: 1

      Even if Google is not the most popular it is still by far the best. Eventually people will realize this. Yahoo and MSN's top five most popular queries in 2001 were probably:

      1. need a better search engine
      2. can't find what I need
      3. I wish I didn't have to use Micro$oft
      4. Yahoo! I couldn't find anything!
      5. Google

      --
      [figz@figz figz]$ kill -9 `ps -ef | awk '$1=="figz" { print $2 }'`
    2. Re:Google NOT the most Popular Search engine by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

      Yahoo USE google as their search engine in a lot of languages (e.g. the German version uses Google).

      So a lot of that Yahoo bar is actually Google!

      Happy new currency.

    3. Re:Google NOT the most Popular Search engine by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      I am stuck in a non-tech job in the military and when I mentioned google once, everyone looked at me funny... and at first I thought, "Are you guys stupid...", but after thinking about it... if you don't use the net much... it could pass you by, whereas you really have to have your head stuck in the mud not to have heard of Yahoo, whether you have access to the net or not.

  39. *REAL* source of the hack. by kwj8fty1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not sure that I follow the reference to the canidian wireless group at the headers, but the folks at seattlewireless have been talking about this for over a month.

    http://www.seattlewireless.net/index.cgi/Wap11Ha ck

  40. why on god's green earth... by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...are people searching for CNN?

    http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist/9-11-searc h. html

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:why on god's green earth... by Rendus · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine a good portion of it were people trying to get to the Google cache of CNN, hoping they were updating it more often (which they did start doing)

  41. Metaspy by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    In case you didn't know, you can go to Metaspy to view searches that are underway on Metafind. I saw a similar link for Google once, but I don't remember where it is. Metafind isn't Google, but its searches show pretty much the same trends this story shows.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  42. That's not what I'm seeing. by jslag · · Score: 1

    Great for media metrix. The stats reports I see, for a number of sites with 1 million+ hits / month, indicate that Google is more popular than all other search engines put together. These sites don't appeal to a particuarly tech-savvy audience either.

  43. Better idea by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

    I don't want Google keeping lists of everything I personally have searched for. I'd be less likely to use it. Plus, what's the point? That's something I would expect from a shady .NET operation like MSN, but not Google.
    A better idea would be: I type in a search term, and at at the top of the search results page, I get one of those little graphs showing me the history of the search term I typed in over the past several weeks/months/years. I bet they could do this, or at least provide it as an option, and I think it would have some real usefulness.

  44. A bit depressing by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

    My faith in the intellect of fellow net users was challenged by the finding that 6,200 people couldn't figure out what CNN's URL was on September 11th.

    Though, I like to think the fact their servers ground to a halt (along with every other news agencies) had something to do with it. Maybe people assumed they got the address wrong when nothing came up.

    Or so I hope.

  45. Noodle Recipes 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noodle Recipes 2001

  46. Observations from 1stTime Poster, Long Time Reader by drelig · · Score: 1

    Observations from 50,000 feet: I'm glad to see that Regis and His Millions are likely to get the plug pulled. Freeing up Google so my images.google.com searces work, um, faster. "eagle" is #3 most searched image after the attack. I wonder how many people then found out that they wanted a bald eagle. I want to know how many people queried "Where is Chandra Levy?". The Internet Knows All. Proof that address bars are not the navigation of choice: Top 9/11 Query: "CNN". Google Knows All. Powerball. Google searchers do not find magic numbers before drawing. Google Does Not Know All. Proof Brick and Mortar=Peace of Mind on the Web: Amazon not in top searches for retailers. Or maybe someone discovered address bar. Whoah, Nicole Kidman is free! No one searched for X10! However will I find such a product? Most Importantly, All Your Base...

  47. the last year in the millenium :) by LM741N · · Score: 1

    So where are all the millenium parties? Oops, I forgot that the media invented last new years day as the start of the new millenium. (remember, there was no year 0 AD)

    1. Re:the last year in the millenium :) by damiam · · Score: 2

      Ummmmm, sorry, but no. January 1st, 2001 was the start of the new millenium (just as January 1st, 0001 was the start of the first millenium). The media invented January 1st, 2000 as the millenium.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  48. my website by spike+hay · · Score: 1

    My website has a URL. I decided to replace the URL with a uniform resource locator. It's better.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  49. Most browsers can do that for you by marnanel · · Score: 2

    You could use a browser that remembered form entries and prompted you with their values last time-- it would have much the same effect.

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  50. Real-time results by marnanel · · Score: 2

    Don't know about overall term ranking, but quite a few search engines allow you to view what people are searching for right now. Try metacrawler's "metaspy" for one example.

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  51. The Seattle(?) Earthquake by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2

    It's not the Seattle earthquake, it's the Olympia Earthquake :) They were looking for the one broken window in Seattle when Olympia had real damage. Bleh, get it right =P

  52. Nostradamus explanation by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

    The spike in Nostradamus searches could be people checking to see if he predicted the WTC disaster. Or, maybe it was the phony prediction that the village idiot (George Bush) becomes the leader in new millennium.

  53. "top" retailers ? by rnd() · · Score: 2

    Shouldn't the "top retailers" section actually be called "retailers with the hardest-to-remember URL's"?

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  54. holiday graphics by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

    My favorite part is how they customize their graphic depending on the holiday that's coming up :)

    Take a look today and see their New Years graphics. I know that Thanksgiving had one too, and probably other holidays.

  55. Sports?! by metlin · · Score: 2

    Top 10 Sports Queries

    2001

    1. anna kournikova


    Ofcourse. I'm very sure those searches were for the sporting capabilities of Anna Kournikova. The question is, which sport? ;-)

    1. Re:Sports?! by jo42 · · Score: 1

      What is a "anna kournikova"?

  56. The stupidity is more than just "CNN" by Flannan · · Score: 1
    Another argument against the "Oh, they're actually smart people looking for cached CNN pages" theory: Searches on the phrase "World Trade Center" shot up from zero to ~2000 per minute just after 9 am ET. For some reason, I have trouble believing hundreds of thousands of people all suddenly felt the urge to leisurely browse scholarly critiques of the WTC's architecture the moment they saw the second plane plow in. They were looking for immediate breaking news, and didn't have a clue where to go or how. (Yes, they have their news headlines page now, but they didn't then. And it doesn't show up on a search results page anyway; there's just a generic "news and resources" button stuck on the bottom bar of every Google page.)

    And let's not even get started on the pathetic explosion of "Nostradamus" searches. Oh, whoops, too late.

  57. Cool... by DennyK · · Score: 2

    America searches for "ellis island" and its roots as the archive of immigration records goes online.

    Awesome...my company hosts that site... ;)

    DennyK

  58. Dutch show by harmonica · · Score: 2

    Actually, the original show was also called Big Brother and was developed and first produced in the Netherlands.