That sounds just like a levy on processes based on their carbon production - the exact kind of regulation that supports public good while enabling capitalism to work with it. In other words, exactly the kind of thing that everyone seems to hate.
In older areas, a "neighborhood" is usually a self-identified group of houses in a given geographical area, that might or might not share a common construction history, but have banded together to promote their common interests. The neighborhood I live in was constructed over some 25 years, with early 1940s houses in the south extending into the mid-to-late 1960s in the north, though there's now enough tear-down and rebuild that some places are brand new.
In contrast, for some older neighborhoods (usually in historical areas) and most newer neighborhoods, the term is mostly interchangeable with "subdivision": the area was planned and platted by a single developer, usually the houses were built at around the same time by a selected number of builders, and there's very often deed restrictions that set up a mandatory home owner's association, which has the ability to create and enforce rules over the appearance and use of properties in the area. Opinions about HOAs vary from loathing to appreciation, depending on the person. With common deed restrictions and a mandatory organization that owners must join, there's a pretty strict legal definition.
Part of my neighborhood - called Shoalmont Addition - was built at once, by a common set of builders, and have very limited deed restrictions (mostly illegal now, heh) but no HOA to enforce them. But the larger Allandale Neighborhood Association (an optional group with no enforcement powers of its own) claims the entire Shoalmont area, and residents of Shoalmont probably don't even know that's where they live. Legally, the ANA has enough clout that the city recognizes it and sends a representative to neighborhood meetings, and zoning correlates with neighborhood boundaries and wishes, but there's not really any legal definition when there's no deed restrictions or HOA involved. Indeed, a small area claimed by the Allandale Neighborhood Association in the south is also claimed by the Rosedale Neighborhood Association, and I think people in that area can join both.
Two definitions based on the evolving style of neighborhood construction. Hope that helps!
Why would you presume that a government investigation has documentation that exactly details the costs? More likely, the investigators were paid via salary, as is the original senator, and other overhead such as electricity and gas for travel are lumped into general budgets. Thus, while the investigation certainly had a cost, much of it is obfuscated.
After a decade in the suburbs, with a box similar to what you describe, one of the things I like best about moving into the city is that I have mail delivery to my porch. I say Hi to the postman or woman when my mail is delivered. It feels like a community. Like others here, I'd much rather get mail just MWF than lose that feeling.
That's not what he said. Dish Network is better for its customers that Direct TV, sure, but Dish Network is the worst company in America to its own employees. Which sucks, since otherwise I've been happy with them for 10 years, but I don't want to support a company that is that bad to its workers. I guess I'll switch to Google TV next year after all.
Your proposal becomes mob rule by abstention. Any majority that comes into power could, merely through inaction, undo any piece of legislation, whereas, in the converse, the item can still be repealed, but must be brought up for the scrutiny of debate and discussion and is subject to veto.
In your proposal, you get crazy shit where the fifteenth amendment expires because the country reverts to racism and segregation after the forward steps of reconstruction. Or did you intend Constitutional legislation to be immune to your review? Who decides which laws come up for review and which don't?
If they can't figure out how to make their lifestyle choices cost effective, then perhaps they need to learn how to be self reliant.
Farming is not cost effective. The self reliant method would be for them to stop farming and move into the cities with you, where you can buy all your food from Mexico and China while American fields sit fallow. And then, in the next famine brought about by climate change, you and your family starve to death because America is no longer self reliant for food.
I don't like the idea of subsidizing rich people who want to live in the country, but the idea of subsidizing farmers so that American food products are cost effective (without the troublesome alternative, tariffs on imported foods) makes perfect sense, and part of that includes ways to let farmers collaborate and communicate. How else are they going to access farmersonly.com?
From my reading experience, such excuses are rarely made, at least when the NTSB is involved in the accident investigation, as they will be for this crash as it occurred on US soil using a US-built aircraft. They're quite willing to lay blame on airlines' training, instrument design, warning systems, scheduling, as appropriate. This, at least, is based on my reading of NTSB report summaries from several dozen of the deadliest air crashes.
A few months ago, I spent my evening reading wikipedia's articles about air disasters that resulted in more than 50 fatalities, starting in the 1950s and working my way forward. It's not that hard to do using their navigation, and it was fascinating to read about the events that resulted, one by one, in the establishment of the processes (like Crew Resource Management or global use of English for air traffic communication or how to design a cargo door) that solved the identified problems.
As you point out, accidents due to faulty equipment were early and often, then rarer, appearing more often in crashes in foreign countries still flying the older planes. Lately they've been very rare, with crashes due to crew error the only remaining consistent factor.
If anyone else is similarly interested, I recommend it as good reading to see how an industry evolved and matured into one as safe as it is today.
If the first one was so bad, why did you buy a second?
By the way, I've been pretty happy with my Roku XD. It's significantly smaller than any media PC I could have bought and serves all of my needs, and hasn't in my experience had the problems you've had with Boxee.
US law requires anything being sold as a "television" to have a built-in digital tuner". This was intended to prevent potential fraud situations where a customer thought they were buying a television (that can receive OTA) but were actually being sold a monitor (that can't).
But, if someone is selling a big screen as a monitor, it's 1024 x 768 resolution makes it sound horrible, even if that's fine for HDTV viewing. So I don't think there are many of these on the market.
I'm not bothered by any of this. There are distinct words for devices with and without OTA tuners, and it's the government place to regulate commercial speech to prevent fraudulent advertizing, by forcing vendors to use the correct terms to describe their products.
Oh, and since you made some sort of Snowden remark referring to me, I think you might not understand how the law works. You know the Guardian reporter who's been printing all of this classified information? Yeah, he's an American citizen. Notice how no one is trying to arrest him, because he hasn't done anything wrong. Every once and a while the first amendment shows how powerful it can be. That same freedom protects me when I post, anonymously, that in 1999 my college professor mentioned the existence of (but no details of) a previous project he worked on, one that later resulted in a classified patent.
Now, did he break the law in mentioning it? Maybe. Apparently he was a little loose with the law, given that he was later arrested and convicted of sharing military secrets with the Chinese. But I've certainly done nothing wrong.
Ahh, maybe, good point. I ended up not taking my professor's offer to go to grad school and work for his company, which turned out to be a good idea when it was shut down and he was later arrested for sharing military secrets with the Chinese or something. Thus, I really never got that deep into any of the plasma sciences studies.
My professor at the time, J. Reese Roth, is currently serving a prison sentence for mishandling military secrets. So, yeah. I'm right and you're a troll.
The guns are made out of ABS. While, to my knowledge, 3D printer machines use small ABS pellets, I assume they could be made from shavings of other shapes, and there's enough LEGO in the market that rogue gun makers could buy second-hand parts to melt down for decades.
No it wasn't. "Depart" is what happens when the plane pulls away from the gate, and is about to take off. "Deplane" is what happens when the plane pulls into the gate at its destination, and people exit. They are two completely different words for two completely different circumstances, when used in the context as he did.
(Sure you could say "depart the aircraft" to mean the latter circumstance, but "deplane" says the same thing with the eloquence of using the proper term.)
My college professor in plasma sciences told us - 13 years ago - that he invented and patented the deflector shields, using this method. He was working under an Air Force contract, and they immediately classified his patent.
I suspect that is more likely the reason it wasn't being done (publicly) previously. I've assumed every Air Force satellite has had this for a decade.
Here it's 50 feet from a dwelling on an adjacent property, but you can keep them near your own dwelling no problem. That's enough space for many houses, even in suburban areas - provided there's no HOA of course.
Chickens don't have AM feeding requirements. And chicken manure is only a problem if you are keeping too many of them in cramped space with insufficient litter - probably because you're thinking about a farm with a coop big enough to work in, which is 0% like a backyard coop with deep litter for a half dozen chickens who can also roam the yard during the day.
But the three dozen eggs a week taste better, and no, I couldn't buy eggs that taste this good from any store. I can buy chicken from the store that tastes, well, like chicken, so I buy the chicken meat and grow the eggs.
The behavior you describe is abnormal. They are establishing dominance over each other - something that should have been sorted out quickly years ago. And healthy chickens certainly have no interest in eating feces.
Austin's ordinances allow for roosters under the caveat of the noise ordinance, which means that they are okay unless someone complains about the noise. Even in the center of town, we only have one neighbor, and they like our chickens, and we have a Serama rooster, who fully-sized is about nine inches tall, and who is quieter than the hens or the wild birds or the neighborhood dogs and cats.
Slashdot Mirror
That sounds just like a levy on processes based on their carbon production - the exact kind of regulation that supports public good while enabling capitalism to work with it. In other words, exactly the kind of thing that everyone seems to hate.
That's because you have to pay to live in Silicon Valley.
For the same salary he'll have a significantly higher standard of living in, say, Austin, assuming he's willing to live in Austin.
In older areas, a "neighborhood" is usually a self-identified group of houses in a given geographical area, that might or might not share a common construction history, but have banded together to promote their common interests. The neighborhood I live in was constructed over some 25 years, with early 1940s houses in the south extending into the mid-to-late 1960s in the north, though there's now enough tear-down and rebuild that some places are brand new.
In contrast, for some older neighborhoods (usually in historical areas) and most newer neighborhoods, the term is mostly interchangeable with "subdivision": the area was planned and platted by a single developer, usually the houses were built at around the same time by a selected number of builders, and there's very often deed restrictions that set up a mandatory home owner's association, which has the ability to create and enforce rules over the appearance and use of properties in the area. Opinions about HOAs vary from loathing to appreciation, depending on the person. With common deed restrictions and a mandatory organization that owners must join, there's a pretty strict legal definition.
Part of my neighborhood - called Shoalmont Addition - was built at once, by a common set of builders, and have very limited deed restrictions (mostly illegal now, heh) but no HOA to enforce them. But the larger Allandale Neighborhood Association (an optional group with no enforcement powers of its own) claims the entire Shoalmont area, and residents of Shoalmont probably don't even know that's where they live. Legally, the ANA has enough clout that the city recognizes it and sends a representative to neighborhood meetings, and zoning correlates with neighborhood boundaries and wishes, but there's not really any legal definition when there's no deed restrictions or HOA involved. Indeed, a small area claimed by the Allandale Neighborhood Association in the south is also claimed by the Rosedale Neighborhood Association, and I think people in that area can join both.
Two definitions based on the evolving style of neighborhood construction. Hope that helps!
I think video of themselves is their good, and they'll trade it to us in exchange for the other things they need.
Why would you presume that a government investigation has documentation that exactly details the costs? More likely, the investigators were paid via salary, as is the original senator, and other overhead such as electricity and gas for travel are lumped into general budgets. Thus, while the investigation certainly had a cost, much of it is obfuscated.
I dunno about you, but I live somewhere safe.
After a decade in the suburbs, with a box similar to what you describe, one of the things I like best about moving into the city is that I have mail delivery to my porch. I say Hi to the postman or woman when my mail is delivered. It feels like a community. Like others here, I'd much rather get mail just MWF than lose that feeling.
That's not what he said. Dish Network is better for its customers that Direct TV, sure, but Dish Network is the worst company in America to its own employees. Which sucks, since otherwise I've been happy with them for 10 years, but I don't want to support a company that is that bad to its workers. I guess I'll switch to Google TV next year after all.
Your proposal becomes mob rule by abstention. Any majority that comes into power could, merely through inaction, undo any piece of legislation, whereas, in the converse, the item can still be repealed, but must be brought up for the scrutiny of debate and discussion and is subject to veto.
In your proposal, you get crazy shit where the fifteenth amendment expires because the country reverts to racism and segregation after the forward steps of reconstruction. Or did you intend Constitutional legislation to be immune to your review? Who decides which laws come up for review and which don't?
If they can't figure out how to make their lifestyle choices cost effective, then perhaps they need to learn how to be self reliant.
Farming is not cost effective. The self reliant method would be for them to stop farming and move into the cities with you, where you can buy all your food from Mexico and China while American fields sit fallow. And then, in the next famine brought about by climate change, you and your family starve to death because America is no longer self reliant for food.
I don't like the idea of subsidizing rich people who want to live in the country, but the idea of subsidizing farmers so that American food products are cost effective (without the troublesome alternative, tariffs on imported foods) makes perfect sense, and part of that includes ways to let farmers collaborate and communicate. How else are they going to access farmersonly.com?
From my reading experience, such excuses are rarely made, at least when the NTSB is involved in the accident investigation, as they will be for this crash as it occurred on US soil using a US-built aircraft. They're quite willing to lay blame on airlines' training, instrument design, warning systems, scheduling, as appropriate. This, at least, is based on my reading of NTSB report summaries from several dozen of the deadliest air crashes.
A few months ago, I spent my evening reading wikipedia's articles about air disasters that resulted in more than 50 fatalities, starting in the 1950s and working my way forward. It's not that hard to do using their navigation, and it was fascinating to read about the events that resulted, one by one, in the establishment of the processes (like Crew Resource Management or global use of English for air traffic communication or how to design a cargo door) that solved the identified problems.
As you point out, accidents due to faulty equipment were early and often, then rarer, appearing more often in crashes in foreign countries still flying the older planes. Lately they've been very rare, with crashes due to crew error the only remaining consistent factor.
If anyone else is similarly interested, I recommend it as good reading to see how an industry evolved and matured into one as safe as it is today.
If the first one was so bad, why did you buy a second?
By the way, I've been pretty happy with my Roku XD. It's significantly smaller than any media PC I could have bought and serves all of my needs, and hasn't in my experience had the problems you've had with Boxee.
US law requires anything being sold as a "television" to have a built-in digital tuner". This was intended to prevent potential fraud situations where a customer thought they were buying a television (that can receive OTA) but were actually being sold a monitor (that can't).
But, if someone is selling a big screen as a monitor, it's 1024 x 768 resolution makes it sound horrible, even if that's fine for HDTV viewing. So I don't think there are many of these on the market.
I'm not bothered by any of this. There are distinct words for devices with and without OTA tuners, and it's the government place to regulate commercial speech to prevent fraudulent advertizing, by forcing vendors to use the correct terms to describe their products.
Oh, and since you made some sort of Snowden remark referring to me, I think you might not understand how the law works. You know the Guardian reporter who's been printing all of this classified information? Yeah, he's an American citizen. Notice how no one is trying to arrest him, because he hasn't done anything wrong. Every once and a while the first amendment shows how powerful it can be. That same freedom protects me when I post, anonymously, that in 1999 my college professor mentioned the existence of (but no details of) a previous project he worked on, one that later resulted in a classified patent.
Now, did he break the law in mentioning it? Maybe. Apparently he was a little loose with the law, given that he was later arrested and convicted of sharing military secrets with the Chinese. But I've certainly done nothing wrong.
Ahh, maybe, good point. I ended up not taking my professor's offer to go to grad school and work for his company, which turned out to be a good idea when it was shut down and he was later arrested for sharing military secrets with the Chinese or something. Thus, I really never got that deep into any of the plasma sciences studies.
My professor at the time, J. Reese Roth, is currently serving a prison sentence for mishandling military secrets. So, yeah. I'm right and you're a troll.
The guns are made out of ABS. While, to my knowledge, 3D printer machines use small ABS pellets, I assume they could be made from shavings of other shapes, and there's enough LEGO in the market that rogue gun makers could buy second-hand parts to melt down for decades.
No it wasn't. "Depart" is what happens when the plane pulls away from the gate, and is about to take off. "Deplane" is what happens when the plane pulls into the gate at its destination, and people exit. They are two completely different words for two completely different circumstances, when used in the context as he did.
(Sure you could say "depart the aircraft" to mean the latter circumstance, but "deplane" says the same thing with the eloquence of using the proper term.)
My college professor in plasma sciences told us - 13 years ago - that he invented and patented the deflector shields, using this method. He was working under an Air Force contract, and they immediately classified his patent.
I suspect that is more likely the reason it wasn't being done (publicly) previously. I've assumed every Air Force satellite has had this for a decade.
The embassy has a balcony he can step out onto, so he can technically be outside the building in a limited sense.
Here it's 50 feet from a dwelling on an adjacent property, but you can keep them near your own dwelling no problem. That's enough space for many houses, even in suburban areas - provided there's no HOA of course.
Chickens don't have AM feeding requirements. And chicken manure is only a problem if you are keeping too many of them in cramped space with insufficient litter - probably because you're thinking about a farm with a coop big enough to work in, which is 0% like a backyard coop with deep litter for a half dozen chickens who can also roam the yard during the day.
But the three dozen eggs a week taste better, and no, I couldn't buy eggs that taste this good from any store. I can buy chicken from the store that tastes, well, like chicken, so I buy the chicken meat and grow the eggs.
The behavior you describe is abnormal. They are establishing dominance over each other - something that should have been sorted out quickly years ago. And healthy chickens certainly have no interest in eating feces.
Austin's ordinances allow for roosters under the caveat of the noise ordinance, which means that they are okay unless someone complains about the noise. Even in the center of town, we only have one neighbor, and they like our chickens, and we have a Serama rooster, who fully-sized is about nine inches tall, and who is quieter than the hens or the wild birds or the neighborhood dogs and cats.