Slashdot Mirror


The Lepsis Is a Terrarium For Growing Edible Insects At Home

An anonymous reader writes "A recent UN report suggested that people should be eating more insects, because they're much less harmful to the environment that traditional meat. In response, designer Mansour Ourasanah has created the Lepsis, a small insect breeder that could be used to grow and harvest grasshoppers in urban homes."

184 comments

  1. Shell fish might be better by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I wonder what it would take to raise shellfish indoors. Probably not worth it economically, but I can't imagine home insect rearing would be cheaper than buying them from a large producer.

    1. Re:Shell fish might be better by niado · · Score: 1

      Crayfish are commonly raised indoors. Depending on volume, you pretty much just need a tank.

    2. Re:Shell fish might be better by WillAdams · · Score: 2

      Why indoors? Why not commoditize it and automate it as a part of one's home?

      Imagine a replacement window, which is an aquarium, which plus into one's electric and has a small computer to monitor food levels &c., as well as a wireless connection to one's broadband to report on conditions inside the tank.

      One pays to have the window installed, plus a monthly fee to have the aquarium serviced and topped off from the outside through a locked access panel (there's a second set of locks on the inside panel, one for the home-owner, one for the company to lock the homeowner out for non-payment).

      Best of all, one could arrange to have a lobster or larger shellfish dropped into the tank if one has company visiting.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:Shell fish might be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if it breaks from the inside I don't want a crap load of water sitting inside my house....not to mention the face a bunch of sea critters wondering inside said house too...good grief...

    4. Re:Shell fish might be better by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Well dude, there you have your idea for a start-up. Get yourself some venture capital, and off you go !

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    5. Re:Shell fish might be better by AndyKron · · Score: 1

      but you and your cat would know that they were fresh from the terrarium!

    6. Re:Shell fish might be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Crawfish (crayfish) are raised in rice fields and sold in 20lb sacks. As someone who know many different crawfish farmers none of them raise them indoors. Crafish are harvested when it is not rice season from the same fields.

  2. I'm sorry, but... by Mr+Foobar · · Score: 1

    I will not be incorporating any insects aside from water crustaceans into my diet. They may be nutritious, may be tasty, but the "yuck" factor is simply too great to overcome.

    Maybe I could if they were processed, but surely someone will make a big deal about the loss of nutrition with processes insect products.

    --
    -> I dislike sigs...
    1. Re:I'm sorry, but... by lxs · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wouldn't mind, but if I get to raise them myself I couldn't bear to eat them. Look at those cute little mandibles. Look at them!

    2. Re:I'm sorry, but... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I will not be incorporating any insects aside from water crustaceans into my diet.

      You probably already have bugs in your diet. Did you ever eat cherry yogurt? Check he ingredients. It probably lists carmine, which is made from beetles.

    3. Re:I'm sorry, but... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You might not, but I am pretty interested in the idea. The only concern I have is taste vs price.

    4. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like he said, processed.

    5. Re:I'm sorry, but... by mspohr · · Score: 2

      I have started to think about the "yuck" factor also in regard to all animals. When you look at how cows, pigs, chickens, etc. are raised, fed and "processed" by food factories... and look at the blood and gore and what goes into what you end up eating... it's pretty disgusting.
      I've mostly become a vegan (with some fish).
      Also, animal fat (even from organic, free range, etc. animals) is just really bad for you... heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, cancer, etc.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    6. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Insects are only the source of carmine. Your own link shows that the insects are powdered, dissolved, filtered and then the solution is chemically treated! Your implication that eating carmine means gp has bugs in his diet is about as accurate as saying that consuming sea salt means that you have ancient whale shit in your diet.

    7. Re:I'm sorry, but... by slim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A proper meat eater isn't put off by blood and gore.

      I've eaten pig in the farmhouse next to which it was raised, and let me tell you, we enjoyed it all the more for knowing exactly where it had come from.

      Yes, it's cultural and conditioned, and if we'd been brought up eating insects we might find the idea of grasshopper mouth-watering. However, most of us were not.

    8. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually how I feel, not being an animal murderer and all.

    9. Re:I'm sorry, but... by KGIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am something of a "character" I guess. I'll eat anything on the menu. During AIT we also ate insects. I mention that because I want to tell you that I have eaten insects and, frankly, they're not that good. The only "good" one I have found was the chocolate covered ant, because I couldn't taste the ant.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:I'm sorry, but... by camperdave · · Score: 2

      I've mostly become a vegan (with some fish).

      Me too!... apart from hamburger, pork, chicken, steak, bacon, eggs, veal, etc. (It counts as vegan if the animals you eat are herbivores, right?)

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:I'm sorry, but... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      With a pig that good, you can't eat it all at once?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    12. Re:I'm sorry, but... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, you'll hear reports about people who can't bear to eat their precious grasshoppers, so they have been returning them to the wild.
      Then, you'll hear about the swarms of locusts devastating the countryside.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    13. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your implication that eating carmine means gp has bugs in his diet is about as accurate as saying that consuming sea salt means that you have ancient whale shit in your diet.

      He's technically correct. They very best kind of correct.

      P.S. There's a good chance you've got an atom of atmospheric gas in your lungs at this very moment that was in Hitler's lungs at one point. Couldn't resist the chance to Godwin the thread.

    14. Re:I'm sorry, but... by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      Oohh...you know, what, I didn't even think about the PETA factor.

      Any guesses as to how long it will be before Ingrid Newkirk gets her panties in a wad over this? I mean, after all, considering her love of lobster tails...

    15. Re:I'm sorry, but... by losfromla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, animal fat (even from organic, free range, etc. animals) is just really bad for you... heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, cancer, etc.

      Wrong bucko! Wheat is the killer causing those diseases, that and the low fat diet that has plagued this country since the USDA started telling us how to eat (lot of whole grains). Grains are sugars, that's why kids like bread. That way of eating profits agro-chemical companies to the detriment of our health and that of the environment.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    16. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My cousin's father-in-law was a wise farmer. He named his cows stuff like Steak, Sausages and similar. So his children never had "Oh no we can't eat Daisy" moments.

    17. Re:I'm sorry, but... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You probably already have bugs in your diet. Did you ever eat cherry yogurt? Check he ingredients. It probably lists carmine, which is made from beetles.

      There are trace amounts of virtually anything in our food. By your own logic, UN should recommend developing nations to practice cannibalism because we engage in autocannibalism every day by means of digestion of flakes of epithelial cells separated from the inner lining of our mouths.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Medievalist · · Score: 2

      Well, fresh raw tiger swallowtail butterflies taste sort of like watermelon (take the legs and wings off first) and live wood grubs are slightly sweet and actually kind of delicious (ground grubs, though, are gritty and taste muddy) but ants taste of formic acid, and they latch on to your tongue-bumps with their mandibles if you eat them live, so you end up scraping ant-heads off your tongue with your teeth.

      I hear big spiders are tasty, but haven't tried any.

    19. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably already have bugs in your diet. Did you ever eat cherry yogurt? Check he ingredients. It probably lists carmine, which is made from beetles.

      No it doesn't. Nice wikipedia link, but I've never seen carmine as an ingredient (or it's other names). Can you find a single list of ingredient online that does? I bet you can't. A coworker of mine is into telling everyone raspberry flavor has beaver ass in it, because the FDA allows it like carmine. You're spreading stupid urban legends.

    20. Re:I'm sorry, but... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      You didn't read his link, did you? The red coloring carmine, is ground up beetles.

      This isn't casual ingestion of a few incidental particles, this is an actual, listed ingredient. As in they already are intentionally using insects.

      This isn't trace amounts of stuff which you can't avoid. I suspect if most people knew that most foods which have been dyed red are that color due to the presence of insects, they'd be less enthusiastic.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    21. Re:I'm sorry, but... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with you there; I can only recall eating two forms of prepared insects, but they have both been great. Roasted Peruvian jungle grubs were juicer than most meats I've tried and Australian Lemon Ants tasted like sweet lemons (I don't know the proper names of either of those). I also have a few friends who've been brave enough to eat various forms of fried or roasted insects and liked them. Raw animal meats are kinda weird, so I think it is only appropriate that I compare the prepared forms.

      Also, I'm dating a vegetarian who became a vegetarian because she hated the taste of meat and thinks I'm farting, or maybe something died every time the neighbors start a bbq.

      So what I'm trying to say: to each his own, let those who've never tried insects give them a chance. I for one, think they're pretty good.

    22. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, crap. I'm replying to myself, because Dannon and Yoplait both have carmine in strawberry yogurt.

    23. Re:I'm sorry, but... by bdwebb · · Score: 1

      I'm prefacing this by saying my intent is not to insult and I can respect what you are saying and your reasoning.

      I have been a hunter all of my life so part of the routine when I kill an animal is gutting and butchering it myself. For me and for anyone who works in an animal processing industry, the blood and gore associated with the meat is simply a step that has to be gone through in order to obtain the animal's meat for cooking and eating. Ultimately as slim has pointed out, this is a conditioned thing and it has actually been conditioned OUT of our day to day and our eating habits by things like large scale agriculture, transportation and shipping systems, grocery stores and the like. Because we no longer have to butcher our own meats to eat and survive, societies have become more sensitive to the bloody part of meat processing and ultimately, my personal opinion is that people have lost a critical amount of respect for the animals they eat because of it.

      Slim says below that he enjoyed the pork all the more knowing exactly where it came from - some may see this as some sort of sadistic behavior or something but I identify with this because you connect on some level with the animal you are eating and you have an appreciation for what it takes to get your food to your plate at the basest level. While you may be put off by things like blood and gore, for us it is simply part of a process that we have to go through to get our foods. I can imagine that in almost every living person's near past, raising or hunting and subsequently butchering animals and the associated blood and gore was what fed you and your family.

      Your grandparents probably considered this part of daily life and thought nothing of it...pretty interesting how quickly our cultural conditioning can change in my opinion. On the flip-side of the coin it would be interesting to see how quickly that conditioning would disappear if we went through a major agricultural shortage or something along those lines.

    24. Re:I'm sorry, but... by mspohr · · Score: 1

      My "yuck" factor was raised not so much by the blood and gore of slaughter (which I realize is part of the process) but by the practices of factory farms which include inhumane overcrowding, diseased animals (and antibiotics to treat them), antibiotic resistant bacterial contamination, unsanitary processing, mixing meats from animals of dubious origin and health together (most hamburger is a melange of meat from different countries with little knowledge of its provenance) and long time storage and shipping.
      I realize that if you raise your own animals and have control over their feed and health, you don't have many of these problems.
      However, we are still left with the growing mountain of evidence that animal fat is bad for you (primarily cancer and cardiovascular disease).

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    25. Re:I'm sorry, but... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      However, we are still left with the growing mountain of evidence that animal fat is bad for you (primarily cancer and cardiovascular disease).

      Untrue, there is not such mountain of evidence. Such studies never, ever isolate nutrients thus things like eating grains in vast quantities are part of the background and their nefarious effects are not accounted for. Eliminate the grains in your diet, eat fats from animals raised in a natural environment (pastured pork, chicken, beef, etc) and I guarantee your health will improve. I eat probably 15+ avocados a week as they're a great source of fat, also lots of butter, coconut oil and tree nuts. Look at all the fat people around you, they are not gorging on high fat foods, they're living on oatmeal, whole grain breads, cereals, pasta, margarine, low-fat yogurt, low-fat milk... They might be eating more meat than in the past but it is leaner and many more calories in the average USian's diet comes from grains than say, 50 years ago.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    26. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who cant eat daisy obviously didn't have to put in a days work raising daisy or go hungry for a week and get their asses handed to them for being dip shits.

    27. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Tom · · Score: 1

      That's the point. Even putting them into the fridge to kill them (as in this concept) is something lots of people wouldn't want to do.

      Then again, two hundred years ago, most people did kill their own farm animals prior to eating them, so it very much is a cultural thing.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    28. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no. It's a salt that is sometimes chemically extracted from ground up insects. There are other sources of carmine that don't involve insects at all.

    29. Re:I'm sorry, but... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You didn't read his link, did you? The red coloring carmine, is ground up beetles.

      You didn't read his link, did you? The red coloring carmine is a single chemical compound that is derived from another compound extracted from the beetles by means of extensive purification. There are no "ground up beetles" in the food any more than there were "ground up pigs" in porcine insulin when that was used (and nowadays, there's no Escherichia coli in the synthesised insulin that diabetic patients get injected with).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    30. Re:I'm sorry, but... by cusco · · Score: 1

      That's called Soylent Green, coming to a Walmart near you!

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    31. Re:I'm sorry, but... by cusco · · Score: 1

      I was going to say [citation needed], but there are no end of sources making these and even wilder claims. I'll amend that to [citation from actual scientists needed], people have been eating wheat for over 10,000 years and grains in general for far longer. Many peoples throughout history have survived very well on low fat diets made up of mostly starches, such as potatoes, rice, manioc, yucca, yams, taro, etc. Our modern problem seems to be the QUANTITIES we ingest.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    32. Re:I'm sorry, but... by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      I think the "yuck" factor comes mostly from insects being associated with rot, disease, and dead bodies. We don't have that sort of historical association with sea bugs as human sanitary threats, seen by a lot less people getting squicked out by those compared to land bugs.

    33. Re:I'm sorry, but... by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      (It counts as vegan if the animals you eat are herbivores, right?)

      Eat Healthy: Eat Vegetarians!

    34. Re:I'm sorry, but... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Absolutely and you're free to disagree with me. I have tried many things and think that, for the most part, failing to try something is just a loss on your part.

      The best thing about your disagreement, however, is that there is no possible way for you to be wrong. Your tastes are yours and yours alone. They are entirely subjective. You can say, for example, "Dog shit tastes like apple pie to me." The best thing about that statement, and probably the only good thing about that statement, is that you're 100% correct (assuming that you're telling the truth).

      Being subjective is important and was the primary reason for the use of the word "I" so much in my post. I don't expect, insist, or imagine that my tastes will mimic the tastes of the majority.

      You know, this reminds me of something and it's a "something" that I'll often point out to other people as it makes a good conversation and can even be used to open a conversation about the human psyche.

      Have you ever noticed that, when you're out dining with friend(s), they will find something that they don't like and the conversation goes something like this:

      "Eww! This is disgusting... This is the most horrific thing I have ever had the displeasure of putting into my mouth.... Here, you try it."

      And these are your friends! Imagine what they'll do to their enemies.

      Anyhow, taste really is one of those things that is subjective. It's good like that, both the sense of taste and the other definitions of the word such as one's taste in music or in interior styling. I like to point out to people that, yeah, they're unique - just like everybody else. What does seem to differentiate us, even if just a little, is our individual tastes. Those things that are subjective are those things which make us human.

      If you find the taste of insects to be good then, by all means, eat up. I have tried them numerous times in a variety of ways and been displeased with the results. I've tried them since my initial introduction and I'm quite likely to try them again in the future to see if my tastes have changed or if the preparation resulted in something that I consider more palatable. I suspect that I'm biased because my introduction to them was, as mentioned (though I should have been more clear) during AIT which is Advanced Infantry Training. AIT includes survival training, I'm a long-since inactive Marine in case you're curious as to why I'd have done such silly things, and a part of this was finding nutrition when there was no McDonald's, MRE, mess hall, or mom available. It involved eating grubs, someone scrounged up a snake as I recall, a variety of insects, and somehow, quite strangely, a poached deer. (I'm quite partial to venison though that's not really the topic.)

      To this end, I didn't mind the grubs, maggot-looking critters, or the likes. They weren't great but they weren't all that horrific. The insects, on the other hand, weren't very good. In fact, to me, they were quite awful. I wanted to spit them out and vomit but such was not an option. No, such behavior is not an option. I don't think it wasn't an option because there was any specific penalty attached to it. I just don't think it was an option because it was physically impossible to not complete the act in that mindset. One simply wasn't able to do anything less than chew, swallow, and repeat as required. It wasn't because it was needed (there were MREs available and a decent few hour hump would have had us back in civilization) for sustenance. It wasn't even done because the guy next to you was also doing it - he didn't want to do it either. I guess, if I have to try to think about it (and I'm not sure I want to try to figure it out) and really give you a reason then I'd say it was done mostly because the guy next to you MAY not want to do it and because he's depending on you to do it so that you give him courage to do it. It was because, well, he may need it. It was because he'd do that, and more (much more) for you. It isn't easy to explain, really. I guess th

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    35. Re:I'm sorry, but... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I haven't eaten a butterfly but I can confirm that spider isn't on my list of preferred foods either. I don't have an aversion to grubs, weevils, or worms - while they're not something I'm planning on ingesting regularly they're also not on my list of foods that I hold in contempt. The tiger swallowtail butterfly that you mentioned sounds interesting, I would like to try that.

      You mention formic acid... In my effort to respond to the people who replied to me I went from bottom to top so I have a reply below this and I'll quote myself here:

      To me they're just a crunch like a wayward egg-shell in a greasy diner with an acrid goo, sometimes with varied degrees of sour, that inevitably follows it.

      I wonder if it is the acid that makes it have the sour/acrid taste? I don't eat sour things. I enjoy using this as my response when people offer me something sour:

      "No, no thank you. I don't like sour thing. Sour is, by its very definition, unpalatable."

      I really don't like sour things, I actually have quite an aversion to them to the point where I avoid them for the most part. As I only have my own taste buds to compare with, and nothing for an honest reference point, I can only state that I *think* I'm more sensitive to "sour" taste than I am expecting "normal" people to be. I wonder if this may have something to do with the reasons I dislike the taste of insects in general?

      I have tried quite a few insects that have been prepared in a variety of ways and I've yet to find any that were pleasing to me. I haven't even found any that were neutral to me. They have all, except the chocolate covered ants (the real chocolate covered ants, not the fake one that contain no ants and are sold just to find a reason to get kids to eat their chocolate - the idea really boggles me at that level but that's a whole other conversation), been wholly unpleasant tasting.

      I'm pretty open-minded and I have a fairly large group (I think) of things that I enjoy eating. I find many flavors to be enjoyable. I have consumed many things that wouldn't even be remotely considered food in a Western diet. I've had everything from rattlesnake to alligator, from lamb's brain to cow-tongue hotdogs, from horse to tripe (which I didn't enjoy by the way), and more. I've eaten, and enjoyed, a large variety of things because I wanted to have those experiences. In all that, and with number of different insects with a number of different preparation techniques, I haven't found any (save the previously mentioned ants) that were palatable to me.

      Oh well... It is unimportant, really, but so isn't the entirety of this conversation and thread I suppose.

      If I may digress for a moment longer... When people hear about my experiences with food they often ask what alligator tastes like. I am not sure why but it seems to be the most frequent question I get regarding my strange food experiences. I make it a point to tell them how good it is and how flavorful it is, and it is, and I highly recommend trying it if you're ever given the chance. It isn't easy to describe taste usually but alligator is fairly simple... It tastes like chicken (really, I know - but it really does) but it's more than that. It taste like chicken mixed with fresh brook trout. It is absolutely delightful and should be tried at least once if you're ever given the opportunity to have some. Salt, pepper, a wee bit of lemon, lightly breaded, and deep-fat fried. It's like a combination of trout and chicken while still being a unique taste. I absolutely, highly, recommend it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    36. Re: I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some tasty bugs out there. Red ant pupae are going for 230 dollars a kilo.

      That said, most groups who eat bugs fry or BBQ them first. Which makes them taste like whatever you cooked them in. Which removes taste as an issue.

    37. Re: I'm sorry, but... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Taste is, of course, subjective (as I have mentioned). As such, and not for lack of trying or even willingness to try them again, they're just not for me. I've eaten them in a variety of ways and I haven't been pleased with the flavor or the mouth-feel yet. I am open to trying them again, and I'm quite certain that I will, but I doubt the result will be different. The reason I will try them again is because I'll try them prepared in a different way or from a different source so that, when I do, I will do so while hoping that the results will be different.

      By no means would I suggest not trying them for yourself to see if you like them. I'd scoff at such silliness. Absolutely, try them, see if you like them. More importantly, try them before saying you don't like them. If you're not going to try them then don't say that you don't like them, say that you won't try it because you're afraid. It is okay to be afraid, fear is a healthy thing to have. It is even acceptable for folks to admit they are afraid. However, refusing to try them while insisting that they're gross or "icky" is just a cop out for being too ashamed to admit that they're scared.

      So, by all means, try them. Try anything on the menu for that matter. If you don't like something then you don't like it but you don't know how you feel about it until you've actually tried it. You'll note that I didn't say that they were bad, I stated that they weren't that good. Very few foods are, in my opinion, bad. There is no food that I won't eat if I'm hungry enough but there are some that I'll avoid until that point. Insects are closer to the point of the starvation food than they are to the regular food-stuffs on that scale for me. But, to be clear, I'll be eating insects again long before I'm starving simply because I want to see if I find an insect and preparation method that is palatable for me and because the challenge of finding that combination is enjoyable.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    38. Re:I'm sorry, but... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      oh, you mean like a double blind controlled study which is sponsored by a major corporation such as Monsanto or ADM? Do you really think that "actual scientists" get paid to discover the truth when it is contrary to their sponsor's opinions? And if they do, do yo think they publish it?
      In the age of widespread information, we no longer have to rely on formally vetted "experts". If you won't believe the evidence that a cardiologist with case files for thousands of patients, then who would you believe?
      Please name these low-fat thriving peoples throughout history, because afaik there are no such. Most of them ate as much fat as they could find be it from grubs, milk, whales, fish, or game animals. So, I will ask for citation, please.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    39. Re:I'm sorry, but... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Any rural Andean population from prehistory to today. Japan from prehistory to the 1930s (except nobility). Polynesia before European arrival. Egypt from prehistory to the 1920s, except nobility. Medieval Europe, except nobility (recognizing a pattern yet?). India. Persia and Iraq prior to the Muslim conquest, except nobility. Large areas of China from prehistory to the present, except political/military classes. Sure, any of those people would eat high-fat foods if they were available, but they generally are/were not except on holidays (there's a reason they're called 'feast days' in many cultures). If you think that farming families in most of the world had meat to eat more than a couple times a month you've been watching too many Hollywood movies.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  3. Eating bugs is gross! by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now excuse me while I rip apart this lobster!

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Eating bugs is gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Biologically, crustaceans are quite distinct from insects.

    2. Re:Eating bugs is gross! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Actually, since our tastes evolved eating bugs, most flavors are probably the flavor of this or that bug.

      Mmmmmm...long chain hydrocarbons!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Eating bugs is gross! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I watched a documentary once about some scientists stranded in the jungle who'd been collecting giant bugs of some sort. They ended up eating their samples they were so hungry. One of them said that they tasted a lot like lobster.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    4. Re:Eating bugs is gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Intellectually, you're quite distinct from humans.

    5. Re:Eating bugs is gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your average grasshopper would be big enough to crack open and find a large meaty piece inside, I would eat it too.

      It's the many thin grating legs that disgust me. On lobsters too. And of course your average bug being perceived 90% inedible chitin hull.
      I even hate eating quails, because they're mostly bone which you're basically forced to eat.

      I'd like to try a 3 foot dragonfly.

    6. Re:Eating bugs is gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't crabs the proto versions of spiders? I think I heard that somewhere. Not sure where Lobsters stand in this but I bet there's some distant relation to later insect species.

  4. Great Potential by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    It could also be used to breed extra-noxious stink bugs for en-masse deployment at bachelor parties, graduations, and other prime prank targets.

    Or would the NSA brand me a terrorist?

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    1. Re:Great Potential by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Many years ago, after the bank forclosed on my moms house - she had been laid off - I purchased 400 cockroaches and let them go in the house.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Great Potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait so you put cockroaches in a house because your mother didn't pay her bills? Do you feel better about yourself? Does your mother know you did that too?

    3. Re:Great Potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was a swap- His mom had to go live in his basement, so he moved the current inhabitants of his basement to her old place.

      As an aside, I've heard of much much worse things being done to foreclosed properties.

    4. Re:Great Potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Same thing happened to me, and I took a fucking shit in the living room floor. It stunk so bad.

  5. Eating insects? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with soy, tempeh and other alternatives? Don't tell me people need to eat meat to live, look at places like India.

    1. Re:Eating insects? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This might be competitive cost wise.
      Soy is fine, but tempeh is just inedible. People do not need a lot of things to live, but what is wrong with eating insects? It is not like they have the complex nervous systems that animals have. They can almost surely not even feel pain, they are practically simple biological machines.

    2. Re:Eating insects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with soy?

      Moobs. Man boobs.

      Moobs.

    3. Re:Eating insects? by slim · · Score: 1

      This might be competitive cost wise.
      Soy is fine, but tempeh is just inedible. People do not need a lot of things to live, but what is wrong with eating insects?

      I find it strange that you call tempeh (which is, by the way, made of soy) inedible, but you feel you could stomach insects.

      Of course it's subjective, but I find tempeh pretty easy to enjoy, whereas I can can see how tofu is an acquired taste.

      Whole insects - that turns my stomach. Something I know to be ground-up insects, also turns my stomach. I can handle small amounts of insect matter as an additive (e.g. cochineal) or a contaminant. Yeah, I'd give it a go - I've eaten all sorts of things to be macho - but I'd rather go vegetarian than make insects a staple.

    4. Re:Eating insects? by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with soy, tempeh and other alternatives?

      The taste.

      Don't tell me people need to eat meat to live, look at places like India.

      I don't need meat to live. Eating meat is among reasons I _enjoy_ living.

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    5. Re:Eating insects? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      If God didn't want us to eat meat, why did he make animals so tasty?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Eating insects? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It has a taste like peanuts, which I find to be horrible.

      I like tofu just fine. I find nothing disturbing about eating insects.

    7. Re:Eating insects? by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      Does that mean God wants us to eat longpig too?

    8. Re:Eating insects? by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      Soy is just as bad as corn when it comes to the agricultural genocide of our ecosystems. Otherwise I like fried soy chunks however they are flavored.

      The problem is when people fixate on any one solution. Steak is nice and everyone deserves an opportunity to try it. I would supplement my diet with algae and insects if it was cost effective and tasted fine (which I'm sure many do).

    9. Re:Eating insects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with soy, tempeh and other alternatives?

      Some people worry about the effects of soy phytoestrogens on men's health, particularly thyroid health and loss of memory function in old age. Personally, I avoid soy in refined products like protein drinks & milk alternatives.

    10. Re:Eating insects? by slim · · Score: 1

      Fine, but you must surely recognise that both of those things put you in a minority.

      Most people like peanuts. Most (in the "developed" world, at least), are grossed out by the idea of eating insects.

    11. Re:Eating insects? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Most Americans like peanuts.
      Ask europeans about peanuts or peanut butter and you will probably find most do not like peanuts.

      I am not sure I can agree with that latter part either, but it seems more believable.

  6. Insect bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can always feed the bugs to pigs: http://www.pereanu.com/comic/entomophagy/

    1. Re:Insect bacon by CayceeDee · · Score: 1

      Or use them to feed your tilapia or other aquaponically raised fish.

    2. Re:Insect bacon by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The worms and flies that my chickens eat are pretty damn tasty two days later, fried with some salsa.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  7. Why not learn from the 3rd world? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    They do it well.

    1. Re:Why not learn from the 3rd world? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Sure, or for that matter cave people.

      Some of us like the idea of progress, you know. Holding up the 3rd world [Also, Dude, 3rd world is not the preferred nomenclature. Undeveloped world, please] as some shining example of where we should be heading doesn't appeal to many people in our society.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    2. Re:Why not learn from the 3rd world? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      Why not if they are happier than the so called developed ones?"

      Is it prejudice, no?

    3. Re:Why not learn from the 3rd world? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Is it prejudice to say that it is not a good thing to simply throw up our hands in defeat and await the next mass extinction event?

      Or do you think that the colonization of space will be led by subsistence farmers from Paraguay?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  8. why not garden and have chickens instead? by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 3, Interesting
    many people have lawns. Lawns are mowed to look nice. Nice looking lawns are not useful for food production. Kill the grass and plant the whole yard with food for your family, and then maybe they won't have to eat bugs.

    also if you have a yard, you could parcel off a small bit of it for a chicken coop for not too much money and grow your own eggs / chickens

    I think I'll probably try things like that before I raise insects for food.

    1. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Chickens are vile creatures. They shit everywhere and are in general pretty much horrible. I have seen them peck giant gaping wounds into each other. So not only are they terrible to non-chickens, they are equally bad to other chickens.There is no way grasshoppers are that filthy or evil.

      Also many urban and suburban areas thankfully have zoning that does not allow the keeping of chickens. I would rather not be woken up at 4am because you don't want to go to the store to buy eggs.

      I would probably rather eat insects than chickens, assuming they taste ok.

    2. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a city slicker who has never

        - mucked out a stall
        - gotten up at o’dark thirty to feed and water the animals
        - been awoken on the one day one might be able to sleep in by the crowing of a rooster

      Above all, chicken manure stinks to high heaven --- when I spent a summer working in a friend's coop, my mother insisted on my hosing my clothes off when I came home, then undressing directly into the washer and going directly to the bath.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by niado · · Score: 3, Insightful

      many people have lawns. Lawns are mowed to look nice. Nice looking lawns are not useful for food production. Kill the grass and plant the whole yard with food for your family, and then maybe they won't have to eat bugs.

      also if you have a yard, you could parcel off a small bit of it for a chicken coop for not too much money and grow your own eggs / chickens

      In most municipalities, you can't really raise chickens. E.g where I live chickens cannot be kept within ~100 feet of a dwelling structure.

      Gardening is usually doable though! Unless you are under a super obnoxious HOA, you can usually get away with a food-garden.

    4. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 1
      funny how the negative replies come so quickly - I actually have a coop currently, so na-na you're wrong

      it's definitely better than eating bugs. previous reply person "h4rr4r" can have all of my share of bugs and I will keep the vile creatures

    5. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by operagost · · Score: 2

      So you're telling me that you only eat nice critters?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickens are illegal to own in Los Angeles county in a typical residence. (I'm sure there's exceptions for farms)

    7. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by orchardville · · Score: 1

      Keeping up to 4 laying hens responsibly in a decent-sized urban back yard is actually quite rewarding, and requires little work (average 5-10 minutes per day for up to 4 eggs per day). If you treat them like a factory then yes, you will get "vile creatures". Input=output. Chickens kept in poor living conditions can be expected to behave like prisoners.

      I am not aware of any large cities with ordinances that allow for roosters, but even so they are a hell of a lot quieter than the dogs and ambulances and drunk people that you deal with in the city.

      As to the smell: as long as you provide clean bedding materials, move their coop at least twice a year and compost the waste it should not be an issue. And you'll end up with ample quantities of the best fertilizer out there for your garden.

      All this depends on having a patch of land to work, which the system in the article is a clever alternative to if you have a desire to be connected to your protein source.

    8. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickens are vile creatures. I have seen them peck giant gaping wounds into each other.

      So they are basically no worse than you religious fanatics that worship the state then.

    9. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      These chickens had acres of room. They still insisting on pecking at each other and eating their own feces. I would rather not be involved at all with such foul fowl.

    10. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yeah, city slicker. That is why I know this about chickens.

      Listen redneck, I raised them and it sucked. None of those are fun things, but I have done them all. There is nothing good about doing any of them either. Anyone who thinks there is, is simply falling to the noble savage BS.

    11. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I never said that.
      I just would rather not be around the damn things.

      I would prefer to eat cleaner animals though.

    12. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These chickens had acres of room. They still insisting on pecking at each other and eating their own feces. I would rather not be involved at all with such foul fowl.

      Seriously, that is abnormal behavior for chickens. Yes, it does happen, but it is abnormal.

      You should do some research and uncover the reason why they act like that and fix it.

      Seriously, there's no reason why healthy chickens should act like that.

    13. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The reason is because they are broccoli on legs.

      The fix is to kill and eat the bastards and not replace them.

    14. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Austin's ordinances allow for roosters under the caveat of the noise ordinance, which means that they are okay unless someone complains about the noise. Even in the center of town, we only have one neighbor, and they like our chickens, and we have a Serama rooster, who fully-sized is about nine inches tall, and who is quieter than the hens or the wild birds or the neighborhood dogs and cats.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    15. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The behavior you describe is abnormal. They are establishing dominance over each other - something that should have been sorted out quickly years ago. And healthy chickens certainly have no interest in eating feces.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    16. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      But the three dozen eggs a week taste better, and no, I couldn't buy eggs that taste this good from any store. I can buy chicken from the store that tastes, well, like chicken, so I buy the chicken meat and grow the eggs.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    17. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Chickens don't have AM feeding requirements. And chicken manure is only a problem if you are keeping too many of them in cramped space with insufficient litter - probably because you're thinking about a farm with a coop big enough to work in, which is 0% like a backyard coop with deep litter for a half dozen chickens who can also roam the yard during the day.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    18. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Here it's 50 feet from a dwelling on an adjacent property, but you can keep them near your own dwelling no problem. That's enough space for many houses, even in suburban areas - provided there's no HOA of course.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    19. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

      And if you have a neighborhood association or even just neighbors, they'll shut you down in a second. And then there's the zoning laws, any number of animal rights groups, Monsanto, etc.

      Now, I'm with you on the garden part, where allowed, and fight for it where it's not. Chickens are loud and stinky, though, and unless you have a bunch of neighbors who are in on it, then it won't go so well.

    20. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fix is to kill and eat the bastards and not replace them.

      I know you're being sarcastic, but in your case I think that's a good solution.

      Nothing personal, but you sound like you don't have the temperament to raise chickens.

      Good luck with your grasshopper diet.

      Personally, I rather have the chickens eat the grasshoppers and turn them into eggs and nuggets.

    21. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am not being sarcastic.
      They are filthy animals and I have no need for them. At least a pig given a chance will keep itself clean.

      That solution is actually the one we used.

    22. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are filthy animals and I have no need for them.

      Congratulations on repeating that point 4 times and adding very little to the conversation. Your 1 instance of working with chickens is hardly a large enough sampling to make a broad correlation across the entire population of chickens in the world.

    23. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Please show me these clean and nice chickens. I have seen them in other locations. They shit everywhere, eating feces is commonly reported online as well.

    24. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by JThundley · · Score: 1

      The whole reason people have lawns is to show off that they own land and that they're so rich they don't have to farm on it. Let me also remind you that this whole eating bugs idea is for poor countries that don't have enough food to go around, not us Americans. We have too much food.

    25. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad that's working out for you. I honestly did not see that coming.

      I would have thought pigs take at least twice the effort to raise than chickens and they don't give free eggs while you're raising them either.

      But my philosophy is "Whatever Works" and if raising pigs works for you, more power to you.

    26. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Even a coop big enough to work in, and a flock of around 30 chickens isn't too bad. But they need to have enough space, or things DO get bet.

      Actually, if you've got enough space, you almost don't need to care for them. Separate the losers of fights until they recover, a bit of food (though with enough space they'll mainly find their own. Still, you want them to accept you, and to lock them in the coop at night, so you don't lose a bunch to raccoons or skunks. And you need to have fresh water available. (Open pans won't work, as chickens have no idea of sanitary habits. Either flowing water or a water dispenser...the dispenser is usually easier.)

      It also matters just what breed of chickens you have. Some breeds like to make a nest for their eggs and hide out in it. Others are quite happy with nest that you make in the coop. Especially if you put a glass egg in it. My grandfather (or perhaps grandmother) preferred Rhode Island Reds. Some prefer Plymouth Rocks, but they like to build their own nests. And, of course, commercial places tend to perfer Leghorns. They lay larger eggs.

      Still, if you have chickens, you can't go away on vacation, not even for a weekend. You need to ensure that they are safely locked up every night, and let them out in the morning. (Unless, that is, you have a much larger secure area. If you lock them up in a small area too long, you get fights, and the loser can't flee...which generally means one dead chicken.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    27. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have done better if you were less of a bitch about the whole thing.

    28. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by losfromla · · Score: 1

      From what little I know, they peck in the feces looking for the grubs of insects which may have laid eggs there. This is why in integrated farming/ranching 3-4 days (as I recall) after cows have mowed a field, the chickens are released into it, so the grubs have have had a chance to hatch and grow a bit but not turn into flies yet. I think the chickens aren't too smart so they search any poop for insects.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    29. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You needed blinders. A little piece of plastic stapled to their upper beak that prevents them from seeing directly in front of them. This cuts down on fighting.

    30. Re:why not garden and have chickens instead? by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      also if you have a yard, you could parcel off a small bit of it for a chicken coop for not too much money and grow your own eggs / chickens

      Giving the chickens a free run of the vegetable garden will help in the control of slugs, crickets, and other insects that like to munch on your food, their scratching will control weeds to some extent, while depositing their fertilizer right where it's needed. This will also improve the color, omega3/omega6 balance, and general nutrient profile of the eggs (see, I do eat my insects). However, look out for your leafy veggies. My chickens discovered that they just LOVE brassica (cabbage, broccoli, etc.) leaves, and would leave only the leaf skeletons on the plants. Lettuce plants weren't that safe either. I haven't tried it yet, but some wire cage around the plant or bed with the favourite plants would probably help a lot.

      A moveable/portable chicken coop (open-bottomed wire cage with nesting/roosting space) helps a lot in making the effects less random and more controllable :-) Simply put it over the bed where services are required for the day or few days, or leave the hatch open for completely free roaming. Requires less material (money) than a bigger coop too.

      I have observed my rather tame chickens (bantam size) catching mice and frogs... seems there's still some dinosaur in them. Makes me glad they're'nt ostrich size, because then the neighbor's Doberman would not be safe either. But in general they are loveable animals to which one can get quite attached, and can make good pets for kids. The fact that mine have open outdoor space helps a lot with the smell and turning their droppings into harmless dry pellets. While it is not likely that they will come up with the Unified Theory, I am amazed in what they can learn and figure out (applicable to their environment and interest, of course).

      Speaking of omega-3 essential fatty acids. Ruminants grazing the traditional way on green pasture have no way of avoiding the usual insect population and eggs in their diet. Traditional vegetarian societies (e.g. India) have before the advent of produce rinse and other ways of trying to rinse off pesticides, also ingested some insect matter with their vegetation. Omega-3 imbalance seems to be brought about in part by modern agricultural practices and feedlot feeding.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  9. Effective? by dlleigh · · Score: 1

    I'm sure my HOA won't mind at all if I set one of these up and create a personal plague of winged insects to fill my belly and do my bidding.

    "Fly, grasshoppers! Vanquish my enemies and bring back all the yummy meat from their refrigerators!"

    Hmmm... This Lepsis thing might actually work.

  10. Well, great. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    More meat for everyone else.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  11. this is a ridiculous recommendation by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and because 'eat some bugs' gets clicks, slashdot cant stop peddling it.

    full disclosure: im vegetarian

    most bugs dont contain anything more than protein and a bit of fat, and the ones that do are hands-down unapproachable by a consumer whos traditionally a meat and potatoes person.
    http://www.ent.iastate.edu/misc/insectnutrition.html
    if you want some calcium, it would mean getting used to this guy in your mouth:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belostomatidae

    Its absurd, but hey so is the chicken nugget/finger/ring and its violent extrusion the KFC "double down."
    Are we seriously so opposed to broccoli and other vegetables much loathed as children that we're going to eat bugs instead? we already have alternatives to meat that are cheaper, more nutritious, and widely available. The issue at hand is that we put meat in absolutely everything whether it needs it or not. Speaking for the midwest, even salads have cold-cuts liberally interspersed between the nutritionally devoid iceburg lettuce trucked in from new mexico and california. "lets eat bugs" is not a solution to the "meat is expensive" issue because it ignores the underlying problems of factory farming, monocultural foods, and a population of nutritionally ignorant and chronically obese adults and children. until we solve that shitstorm then no matter what we select as our meat methodone its just going to go down the same route.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Danathar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have incisors, which means I was designed for meat. I also have molars which means I can grind pulp and veggies.

      To deny either denies what my body was made for.

    2. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think you have a clue how bugs will be consumed if/when they are. The won't be raised on small farms and sold/eaten whole. They'll be produced in huge industrial plants where the process can be mostly automated. They'll then be processed and ground up in to a paste and sold as a protein product to be made in to other food. Gross? Yeah, but that's pretty much how the meat packing industry works now anyway. Meat is often an industrial processed product, thus the "pink goo".

      The only thing that separates a beef burger and a bug burger is the source of the ground-up protein.

    3. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      I thought the whole point of the bugs was a bit of protein and animal fat. isn't that the point of steak? just make it taste good and look like a burger. it's not like broccoli would fill that role ever... maybe if you genetically engineer the broccoli to consist of animal proteins and fat.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Hatta · · Score: 1, Informative

      most bugs dont contain anything more than protein and a bit of fat,

      Neither do most animals. If you want vitamins, that's what vegetables are for.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by dubdays · · Score: 1

      ... maybe if you genetically engineer the broccoli to consist of animal proteins and fat.

      If I could make bacon out of broccoli, well, you'd see quite the garden in my yard!

    6. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sometimes wonder if ADD is just a subset of survival traits tuned for eating bugs and other various little critters. Ooh shiny nom, nom, nom!

    7. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on, brother! I'm physically dominant to many females, therefore to not rape them denies what my body was made for!

      Or, just maybe, it's time we started taking a longer view than your short-sighted one.

    8. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      You also have canines to keep your squirming, live prey from breaking the vice-like grip of your jaws. I get your point, though.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    9. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      It isn't that we are "designed" to eat meat but that we are adapted such that our bodies are capable of gaining nutrition from meat sources. Nature puts no labels or restrictions on what we should / shouldn't eat beyond what our bodies are capable of processing and what spectrum of nutrients our bodies require to operate. We are the ones making declarations of what we and others should and shouldn't be eating.

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    10. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by avajcovec · · Score: 1

      To deny either denies what my body was made for.

      Actually, it denies what your body was made from. What it's made for is up to you.

    11. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gagh is best when served live.

    12. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by kraut · · Score: 2

      That's an easy process.

      1. Buy a pig
      2. Feed it broccoli (& other stuff)
      3. Slaughter pig
      4. Salt & cure bacon.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    13. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      It's also best eaten whole. If you're going to chew your gagh you might as well just go the whole hog and cook it.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    14. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

      THIS! I grew up in the Midwest and had no idea what an actual fulfilling dinner salad could look like until I left. I thought it was all either a tiny bit of iceberg lettuce and limp looking veggies or a "chef's salad", which is more meat, eggs, dressing, cheese, and general crap than anything else, with just enough iceberg to make it "healthy".

      That said, maybe it will work. Where I'm from, wild game is popular due to hunting culture, and in more rural areas there's still people eating even the small mammals. Bugs isn't THAT weird of an extension compared to those elitist, Left Coast hippy veggies like arugula. And you can deep fry them.

    15. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Vegetarianism is not consistently correlated with a lower obesity level - high fructose corn syrup, corn syrup, cane sugar, white flour, and agave nectar are vegan foods. Honey is a vegetarian food. French fries are vegetarian, and can be vegan depending upon what you use to fry them (most fast food restaurants mix some animal fat in their fryers). Cake is vegetarian. Donuts are vegetarian. Hash browns are vegetarian. Soda, apple juice, grapefruit juice, Budweiser, Miller Genuine Draft, Heineken, and Guinness are all vegetarian. Frappuccinos and Milkshakes and triple espresso caramel lattes with whipped cream are vegetarian.

      Most studies establishing the health of vegetarianism use the Seventh Day Adventists, who live relatively ascetic lifestyles and don't eat meat but also don't smoke, don't drink alcohol, don't consume caffeinated beverages. Who can say whether avoiding steak does more for their longevity than avoiding Dunkin Donuts?

      Aside from eggs and soy flour, most vegetarian foods with high amounts of protein have a lot of carbohydrates or fats along with the protein. You need to eat 600 calories of almonds to get 22 grams of protein. You need an entire pound of vegetarian chili, most legumes, quinoa, or TVP (textured vegetable protein) to get 20-25 grams of protein. That makes it a reasonable task to hit your 50 gram daily recommended allowance from the US government, but 90+% of the fitness guides on the net recommend 1 gram of protein per kilogram of lean body mass or more. Some recommend dramatically more. That's hard to hit as a vegetarian and incredibly difficult for vegans.

    16. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Are we seriously so opposed to broccoli and other vegetables much loathed as children that we're going to eat bugs instead?

      No, I'm going to have a hamburger or a steak. I have no idea why "UN says people should eat bugs to have less impact on the environment" would lead to anybody actually eating bugs.

    17. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Agreed. "Design" is more of a theological/religious viewpoint. Not my intention.

    18. Re:this is a ridiculous recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to pay attention, if you can garden 365 day a year without the need to run the industrial machinery, tractors, crop dusters, the processing plants, the trucking to deliver the food, (I could go on). The whole point behind this is it doesn't take all that which equals less carbon and pollutants, (pesticides ect).

      Would I eat bugs NO, ans grasshoppers are notorious for carrying parasites, even if you cook them "properly". Even veggies carry parasites anymore, and yes so does meat products..

  12. MMMM BUGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's next sewer rats?

  13. Can they overcome the smell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to grow crickets to feed a pet leopard gecko. They smell. I wonder how they will handle this issue, especially as it is designed to be, and I paraphrase, "Attractive enough to sit on your kitchen counter".

    Other than that, insects are not a bad snack. If you bake them first, all their little parts fall right off with some shaking. They are nice and crunchy with a bit of a nutty flavor. I have sampled some smaller ones, and I could easily see myself throwing them on a salad. What gets me are meal worms, grubs and the like. The sensation of biting through the skin and having the guts squirt into your mouth was enough to make me instant vomit.

  14. What? by edrobinson · · Score: 1

    I spend hours getting the bugs out and you want me to GROW more?

  15. terrorarium by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    The Lepsis Is a Terrarium For Growing Edible Insects At Home

    No. No no no. I assure you. It isn't.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  16. Well the UN by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Well the UN and the ones who wrote the report can eat all the bugs they like. I'm going to stick to my Steak,Fish,Turkey,chicken diet thank you very much. I dont care what they taste like smell like or how nutritious they are i aint eating no stink-in bugs.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:Well the UN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You eat bugs all the time. Pounds of them each year. There are the ones used to make red coloring. There are the ones that just get caught up in the processing of food. Hell, you're likely to eat a couple tonight, while you're sleeping.

  17. No. Just.... no. by Dakiraun · · Score: 1

    Enough said.

  18. Bait farm by chuckinator · · Score: 1

    Insane UN recommendation spawns insane product recommendation. I'm not eating bugs, and I don't see anyone rushing out to start changing their diet to incorporate more insects. I have seen people farm insects at home. They do it to cultivate a steady supply of fishing bait and pet reptile food. They always wouldn't bother with this over-designed piece of junk; you can make something like this out of fine mesh, a few wooden posts, and some cardboard egg crates.

  19. We should eat bugs by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    So they can eat steak

    We should use a donkey cart

    So they can go first class in their private jumbos...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  20. Did they actually try it out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if authors of this kitchen invention have ever actually grown amount of grasshoppers that's suitable even for occasional light snacks. If they have, they should know in swarms of any mentionable size - hundreds or thousands - those critters cause intolerable noise. If not to you, to your urban neighbours. It's nice to be green, but please be realistic. It won't take long before you really get tired of that noise.

    Just go to your neighbourhood Chinese food shop and buy your insect snacks there. Grasshoppers are nice, but it's quite a massacre having even a small snack, and you should know how much noise even a single critter at your home can cause.

  21. Re: illegal chickens by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 1
    a good reminder why I don't want to live inside any city's jurisdiction - laws telling you what you can't do with your own land etc... fines for not mowing your yard etc

    I'm looking for a new home now, so it's good to keep the cancerous liability of city ordinances in mind.

  22. Not bad for the open-minded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Food is food. I couldn't care less about how many legs it has or used to have.

    I like the idea of growing my own protein sources at home, and I don't much mind what it looks like as long as it tastes fine and keeps me goin'. Y'all can stick to your revulsion, but really this is just a proposal for the people with open enough minds to try new things instead of saying "Ew, this looks so gross I'll never try it."

  23. Rhymes with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are already squeamish (right or wrong) about chomping on bugs. Does it make sense to produce a product that rhymes with Sepsis?

  24. People will be okay with this by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Just mash them and make them look like a hamburger. It's not like we need to process these bugs in a way that they still look like bugs.

    1. Re:People will be okay with this by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. How about using the bugs (properly prepared and ground) as an additive to ground animal meats?

      The result would be a higher protein/lower fat meat that, with the animal meat would look and probably taste similar to pure animal meat.

      I'd be fine with something like that (labelled accurately of course), but I've eaten grasshoppers in the past (combining them with animal meat would go a long way to making it a more pleasant experience, but that's just my cultural bias...).

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    2. Re:People will be okay with this by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Or feed them to your fish and chickens.

  25. Re: illegal chickens by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    You live next to a guy who decides to turn is backyard into a giant chicken coop and I'm sure you'd change your mind about that. Those zoning laws are about expectation for home buyers. It's one thing if you're rural, totally another if you go "hog wild" in your suburban back yard.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  26. Let the UN eat bugs by Freddybear · · Score: 1

    I tell you what, when the UN converts all its restaurants and cafeterias to raise and serve insects then get back to us.

  27. It's really not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been raising B. dubias as a food source for a couple years. I fry them (after killing them in the freeze and removing wings/legs) with a bit a soy sauce and some spices. They taste kinda like shrimp and go great with salad. I feed them entirely with my table scraps.

    Honestly, western culture is so bizarre. We're fine with eating bottom feeders and drinking bovine lactation mixed with pus, but insects are gross? We need to get our shit together.

  28. The only way is a slow, cultural change by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    The only people who are going to go out an eat a bug are the very daring Fear Factor types. Heck, I know rural kids who won't touch seafood because they never grew up w/ it and the smells/sights are off-putting. But, in a country were there's nothing close to a food shortage, good luck promoting a new, very small, very gross alternative!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:The only way is a slow, cultural change by similar_name · · Score: 1

      It just needs a little marketing. For a first world country, you just need to charge a ridiculous amount for them and call them something fancy. Works for snails anyway.

  29. Guess it depends on how hungry you get... by Kaitiff · · Score: 1

    When McBurgers are readily and cheaply available I doubt you'll see a huge increase in insects in our diet. The parts of the world where bugs are common in the diet are also places that can't afford to raise cattle and pigs etc. As contrary and diverse as our Western culture has become it might be possible to introduce this as a 'cool' alternative, at least in part. Personally I've eaten grasshopper and ants. Both were presented as delicacies, the ants as chocolates and I don't even recall how I ate the grasshopper, but I didn't just catch it flying by and pop it in my mouth. I did watch a special on I believe African food and they showed them peeling open a very large beetle to eat, which almost caused me to lose my lunch. It's all in the presentation I suppose.

    --
    If I sound stupid, it's not me talking....
  30. Re: illegal chickens by KGIII · · Score: 1

    See, you don't get it. We live far enough away so that if the guy turns his backyard into a giant chicken coop we don't even notice.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  31. PETI by CoderFool · · Score: 1

    Enough is enough! How dare they suggest we cage those happy go lucky free range cute little buggers and raise them for our FOOD! What's wrong with them? I am hereby announcing the formation of PETI, People for the Ethical Treatment of Insects. We need to treat the insects humanely and not cage them. It's bad enough that we poison them, zap them, or otherwise murder these helpless little creatures when all they are doing is trying to survive in this cruel world. We need to show our support for our little friends by letting the termites eat our houses, the cockroaches raid our pantries, and treat those mosquitoes, leeches, and ticks to a fine blood meal. This is how we can show them thanks for all they do for us.

  32. it's all about.. by houbou · · Score: 1

    perception and packaging. We aren't use to eating insects and as such we don't find it appetizing, even though in many parts of the world, they have found them to be delicacies. But, say for example someone makes a chocolate flavor protein shake where the protein comes from insects, that will be palatable. I would have a hard time trusting myself to eating insects, especially considering the amount of pesticides these creatures are subject too.

  33. this is more work than they think by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    Sure it looks nice next to your kitchen aid blender right now, but these bugs will make it look like crap in a few days.

    I spent a good many years of my life taking care of reptiles. Part of this involved growing all kinds of food items from fruit flies to cockroaches. Most of these things turn their housings into a shit encrusted shell relatively quickly. it's not the kind of thing you want in the kitchen. It also quickly turns into a ton of work. You'd have to be feeding your bugs every day, cleaning up the shit, removing dead bugs.

    It was a ton of work to raise crickets and mealworms to keep a few lizards alive. It would be even harder if i was raising them to feed me. I've got no issues with eating bugs. I've done it a lot actually. I'd prefer to just pay someone to raise them for me though.

  34. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Aquaponics. Grow vegetables and fish symbiotically.

  35. grasshoppers actually taste really good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up nearby a field in the country side and used to go catch grasshoppers and pan fried them. They're the best tasting food ever.

  36. Blatant misinformation by moerre · · Score: 2

    The OPPOSITE is true: Vegetarians have to look out to get all nutrients. (Disclaimer: I'm talking about real meat. I won't even touch the TOPIC of what's sold as "meat" in US supermarkets, even less that stuff itself) Google "vitamins meat vs vegetables", don't take my word for it. Also, common sense.

  37. Please have a look at the headline - says AT HOME by moerre · · Score: 1

    "The Lepsis Is a Terrarium For Growing Edible Insects AT HOME" So you may be right but YOU are offtopic, not the others :)

  38. Problems by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    1) This is much too small to grow enough bugs to make anything but a light snack once every few weeks/months.
    2) Bugs stink. Any kind of bug- try raising them in any quantity and you'll quickly be turned off by the smell.

  39. Next up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent Green!

  40. Spirulina by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    Why would you eat something as repulsive as insects when you can eat spirulina? It's a perfect food. You could eat nothing but spirulina for the rest of your life and have all your nutritional needs satisfied. It's an easy additive to smoothies, puddings, soups, and anything else. It doesn't taste like much on its own, so it blends well with other ingredients. So it's a much lower bar than eating a worm, grasshopper, or any other insect.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  41. Snails by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

    A lot of people around the world enjoy eating snails (l'escargot). And, apparently they are quite easy to grow for yourself! Don't bother going to an expensive French restaurant and paying tens of dollars for six or twelve snails. Spend that cash on a terrarium, put some various stuff in it, put snails in, and feed them regularly on a diet of fresh greens. Soon they'll be big enough to chow down on.

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
  42. Can I save $$ eating bugs? by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 1

    Let's say I'm gungho for incorporating bugs into my diet. Seriously, let's just make this assumption to consider things a bit here. Next, let's assume I'm completely selfish and care not at all about "the environment". That is, let's just even the playing field and evaluate "bugs" just on the merits regarding two factors: nutritional benefit; cost (to me).

    Now... why would I want to eat bugs again? For protein? Let's assume so. These days, it seems protein goes from about 4 cents a gram (dairy, etc.) up to 9 cents (high quality meat). If I buy freeze-dried mealworms of the quality you feed birds, it seems to work out to about 6 to 8 cents/gram of protein. And some seem to suggest if you want such for human consumption, you may need to pay more for higher quality. I cannot easily find where to purchase grasshoppers in bulk, but it seems grasshoppers would be more expensive. Crickets may be cheaper though.

    In essence, however, if you're willing to eat what you feed your pets the cost seems to be in the same realm as "normal" protein sources. If you want "better", you'd be paying in the range of high quality meats. So, no... bugs aren't persuading me on cost alone.

    What about nutrition overall? Some tout the protein/fat ratio of some insects. Let's be honest. This doesn't matter at all unless you're willing and able to replace most or all of your protein intake with insects. Until then, you can manage your daily fat/carb/protein mix at a higher level. But that brings me to the next point...

    It would seem you could reduce this cost to next to nothing by growing these critters yourself, as in the Lepsis. But that's silly. You still have to feed the critters. So your cost isn't zero. But more important for consumption purposes... what RATE can an eager bug-eater produce these things? I can see nothing here that states the expected rate of production here. I would imagine if I wished to incorporate this into my diet, I would start with at least 1oz/day. If I wanted full protein replacement, I'd need about 20oz/day. It would seem difficult to imagine home production of such.

    As far as I can tell, this product is a cute novelty with no real practical purpose.

    1. Re:Can I save $$ eating bugs? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      It would seem you could reduce this cost to next to nothing by growing these critters yourself, as in the Lepsis. But that's silly. You still have to feed the critters.

      They're insects. Do you think you have to go out and buy quality, expensive feed? I presume they'd feed on plant life and leftovers you've got lying around.

  43. No ants please! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Please don't eat the ants especially covered with chocolate, honey pot species, etc. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  44. What a great name ... not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: come up with a better name than Lepsis. Shh! - as if eating insects wasn't a marketing challenge already!

  45. Qu'ils mangent de la brioche. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them eat cake.

  46. Read your own link... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Like the production part.

    The carminic acid used to produce the pigment can also be extracted from various microbes engineered for the purpose. Microbes are dissolved in a containment structure separate from their cultivation vats, and then allowed to settle out. The liquid and suspended carminic acid is then siphoned off, and metal salts are then added to give a lake pigment in a procedure that is mostly identical to the procedure for acid extracted from insects.

    Also, the European Union bit:

    As of January, 2012, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has changed the way they manufacture Carmine E120 for pharmaceutical products. The EFSA had raised concerns, over the increasing number of allergic reactions to Carmine derived from insects (E120.360), when used within the British pharmacopeia. Pharmaceutical products which had previously contained insect-derived carmine, have been replaced with a synthesised version of the food colorant.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  47. Bullshit. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmine#Production

    The carminic acid used to produce the pigment can also be extracted from various microbes engineered for the purpose. Microbes are dissolved in a containment structure separate from their cultivation vats, and then allowed to settle out. The liquid and suspended carminic acid is then siphoned off, and metal salts are then added to give a lake pigment in a procedure that is mostly identical to the procedure for acid extracted from insects.

    Aslo, it has been synthesized since the '90s.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Bullshit. by snadrus · · Score: 0

      Since the '90s the US has eaten this synthetic & has also gained a massive obesity spike. Its synthetic nature benefits no one. We don't need fake color to confuse minds into thinking they're seeing fruit.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
  48. Did they have sand available to them? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Or small sharp stones?

    Chickens don't have teeth.
    Instead, they ingest small stones, sand, and other coarse material and they keep it in their gizzard to grind the food with.

    If you were keeping them on a concrete or grassy surface they were very likely forced to eat their own poop just to fill their gizzards with anything coarse.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  49. Excellent! You have solved the obesity problem! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Since the '90s the US has eaten this synthetic & has also gained a massive obesity spike. Its synthetic nature benefits no one. We don't need fake color to confuse minds into thinking they're seeing fruit.

    Would love to see the studies you're basing that claim on.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Excellent! You have solved the obesity problem! by snadrus · · Score: 1

      Sure, which fact bothers you:
      - More dies eaten per American after 1990 than before.
      - No claims of health benefits in dies
      - Dies are mostly used with artificial fruit flavor
      - Died candies, sodas, etc have more calories than fruit &/or water they're simulating, especially when considering the absorption effects of fruit fiber.
      - Weight gain (thus, obesity) is based on excessive caloric intake.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    2. Re:Excellent! You have solved the obesity problem! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      - More dies eaten per American after 1990 than before.
      - No claims of health benefits in dies
      - Dies are mostly used with artificial fruit flavor
      - Died candies, sodas, etc have more calories than fruit &/or water they're simulating,* especially when considering the absorption effects of fruit fiber.
      - Weight gain (thus, obesity) is based on excessive caloric intake.

      Since you seem to have trouble reading let me make it easier for you.

      WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE STUDIES YOU'RE BASING THOSE CLAIMS ON.

       

       
      *WTF? Chocolate and Coca Cola are simulating fruit? Which one? I want me some of that fruit.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:Excellent! You have solved the obesity problem! by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I bow to your vast knowledge. Do share the health benefits of color, the died yet unsweetened food you eat, and what natural foods with bright colors that are not fruit you eat.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
  50. Fire Marketing by caspy7 · · Score: 1

    I have an idea, let's name it like a horrible medical condition!
    That'll get consumers to accept it!

  51. getting the meat off of the... bones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you could clip the leg at the joints, then push the meat out with a stiff wire. Each grasshopper will yield two specs of meat for a burger. This will take a very long time.

    Or were you expecting me to eat them whole, including the poop? That's not how I eat a chicken. You're asking for way more that just "eat bugs". You're telling me to eat shit.

  52. Don't look now but... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ... your onus is showing.

    But as I am good sport... I'll give you not one but TWO examples.

    And to think that George Carlin died without (probably) learning about that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  53. Goals by snadrus · · Score: 1

    The goals of dies & flavors (as a concept) is to confuse bad for good. A confused population is less free to make self-interested choices.
    What is your goal in encouraging this?

    My goal in this response chain is to denounce dies. If any one is a medicine, it should be just that.

    --
    Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
  54. Aquaponics and other advanced horticulture by guinea+pig+C · · Score: 1

    I can see this doing well for those that have a small aquaponics home set up. A few bugs every now and then would be a great treat for your tilapia or pike. Insects generally form a very important part of the food chain, so why not culture them and then transfer that protein up into a more palatable form. Here is a useful excerpt from permaculture guru Bill Mollison. Bill Mollison: "Yes, well sometimes you walk on the land and you have the crop. People say, “I’ve just bought some land I want to develop a crop.” I’ll give you and example. I had a young bulldozer operator in Australia. He’d just bought some really run-down cattle land. He had a bulldozer and he put some dams in. Then he said, “Will you come onto my farm and tell me what I ought to do here?” He had nice dams there which he had stocked with trout. ”How are they going?,” I asked him. ”Fine,” he said. ”I got some eight pounders out of them.” ”When did you put them in?,” I inquired. ”Last year,” he replied. And the place was swarming with grasshoppers; it was overgrazed. I said, “You’ve got your crop; your crop is grasshoppers!” On a 1.8 to 1 conversion ratio you can get a pound of trout for every pound and a bit of grasshoppers. You can trawl those grasshoppers just like you trawl fish. So, the other thing is, grasshoppers go for yellow, so if you float yellow balloons on the dams, you get a rain of grasshoppers into the water. So that’s what he did, and he had his crop. The land might already have its crop on it, and yet you might want to change that crop, and you will come out worse off. For instance, we have a pasture grub that runs at 20 ton to the acre living in the first four inches of the soil. If you covert it into turkey, you’re talking 5 ton of turkey to the acre, just for a small soil-skimming operation daily. But they’re still trying to get rid of the pasture grub! And yet that land can barely sustain a sheep on four or five acres. So where’s the trade off between a 120 tons of protein and 40 pounds of protein as sheep? So, wherever we see that the crop is already there we’ve come out on top. And we have nothing to do." I also heard him say that anacondas have the highest protein conversion rate in the world, if you are looking for a more exciting crop.