According to Wikipedia, research on the Integral Fast Reactor was cancelled due to non-proliferation. Could the work continue now? To me, it seems quite an achievement, that the waste elements produced by the reactor had half lives of only a few decades.
From the cc man page:
-fobjc-gc
Enable garbage collection (GC) for Objective-C objects. The
resulting binary can only be used on Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and
later systems, due to additional functionality needed in the (NeXT)
Objective-C runtime.
One could still make a dialog box that would mimic the system authentication dialog and report that the installer run by the user made the request. After the user has given the password, the malware could run some setuid program that asks for the password.
on the inside, Classic MacOS became quite possibly the most tangled kludge of an operating system ever produced in its last few incarnations, and I do get the impression that Apple is starting to take OS X down that path, too.
What makes you say that? Mac OS 9 seemed kludgy even for the user, but what suggests that Apple would develop OS X in a less disciplined manner than NeXT did?
Slashdot Mirror
Aunt Tillie won't have Application Enhancer installed.
According to Wikipedia, research on the Integral Fast Reactor was cancelled due to non-proliferation. Could the work continue now? To me, it seems quite an achievement, that the waste elements produced by the reactor had half lives of only a few decades.
From the cc man page:
-fobjc-gc
Enable garbage collection (GC) for Objective-C objects. The resulting binary can only be used on Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and later systems, due to additional functionality needed in the (NeXT) Objective-C runtime.
I actually started to feel better...
One could still make a dialog box that would mimic the system authentication dialog and report that the installer run by the user made the request. After the user has given the password, the malware could run some setuid program that asks for the password.
on the inside, Classic MacOS became quite possibly the most tangled kludge of an operating system ever produced in its last few incarnations, and I do get the impression that Apple is starting to take OS X down that path, too.
What makes you say that? Mac OS 9 seemed kludgy even for the user, but what suggests that Apple would develop OS X in a less disciplined manner than NeXT did?
At least it wasn't on the front page anymore :-)
There is, however, a port of GTK for OS X at http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/
See the homepage of The Iraqi Presidency and especially the HTML source:
meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage Express 2.0"