MS is taking a small step in the right direction and all you have to say is "sue them!!!".
Predictable and pathetic.
Even if they don't (which is uncertain) disclose the so called "underlying XML dialect", XML is still much better and open then their old.doc (persistent storage) format, plus they would probably publish software packages for data manipulation.
So it's not totally GPL, so what?! Grow up.
MS is taking a small step in the right direction and all you have to say is "sue them!!!". Predictable and pathetic. Even if they don't (which is uncertain) disclose the so called "underlying XML dialect", XML is still much better and open then their old .doc (persistent storage) format, plus they would probably publish software packages for data manipulation.
So it's not totally GPL, so what?! Grow up.
How do you explain the plethora of X's and Z's in OSS titles? Is it a Unix related thing?