Slashdot Mirror


User: SK-null

SK-null's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
28
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 28

  1. Re:Importance of 64-bit architectures on Intel's Big Chip · · Score: 1
    A real problem this time around is that the C language and its relatives really do like 32-bit integers, and many of the Unix system calls also assume 32 bits. If you make the native int/pointer sizes 64 bits, there's a lot of stuff that will probably break. What kind of experience have people had running code on DEC Alphas and other real-64-bit chips?

    How much do you have in writing *nix code?
    Unix programmers should know better than to assume about the size of types except the fixed size types as int32_t that are avaliable in any *nix system. Unless we screw up of course.

  2. Re: This can be fixed on Why 'rm -R star' Isn't Enough · · Score: 1

    The manual refers to the journaling feature.
    In a journaling file system, structures/data are journaled instead of immediately overwritten. If the systems crashes during while writing, its likely you can at least revert to a previous, coehrent, state of the filesystem, instead of being stuck with a corrupted filesystem.
    Though the effect of this behavior is more or less limited, it should be enough to worry anyone who thinks about using shred.

  3. Re:And that's not all... on Intel Northwood CPU Review · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure but I think DDR-SDRAM should have half the latency as tradicional SDRAM.
    They have more or less the same architecture but DDR-SDRAM tranfers two bits per cycle while SDRAM only tranfers one.
    RDRAM also transfers two bits per cycle but has a completly diferent architecture.