As a previous poster pointed out, you're equating creationists with fundamentalist Christians. There ARE people (and religions) that believe in both evolution and creationism, or at least a form of it. So while the prevailing attitude may be to see these to beliefs as incompatible that is not necessarily the case.
Banning people from study based on religious beliefs? Are you serious, I see a serious issue here, there's no reason you can't study math if you don't believe 1+1 = 2, just don't expect to be graded well:-) The result being that fundamentalists unwilling to openly consider evidence against their beliefs would flunk out.
There sufficent reasons to questions Randi that no one needs to invent them. Even many hard core (CSICOPS types) sceptics will admit that Randi habitually makes logical errors and abuses his guests. This isn't to say that Randi hasn't exposed some outright quackery, but that he is only interested in promoting his agenda, not science.
Slashdot Mirror
Banning people from study based on religious beliefs? Are you serious, I see a serious issue here, there's no reason you can't study math if you don't believe 1+1 = 2, just don't expect to be graded well :-) The result being that fundamentalists unwilling to openly consider evidence against their beliefs would flunk out.
There sufficent reasons to questions Randi that no one needs to invent them. Even many hard core (CSICOPS types) sceptics will admit that Randi habitually makes logical errors and abuses his guests. This isn't to say that Randi hasn't exposed some outright quackery, but that he is only interested in promoting his agenda, not science.